A phase 3, randomized study of ofatumumab combined with bendamustine in rituximab-refractory iNHL (COMPLEMENT A + B study)

The standard of care for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) is rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, with/without chemotherapy. However, multiple relapses are common in these patients. This phase 3, randomized study compared outcomes of a combination of ofatumumab (a second-generation anti-CD20 antibody) and bendamustine, with bendamustine alone in patients unresponsive to prior rituximab-based treatment. Overall, 346 patients were randomized to receive either the combination or bendamustine alone. Bendamustine was given for ≤8 cycles and ofatumumab for ≤12 cycles. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS) after 215 protocol-defined events assessed by independent review committee (IRC). Median IRC-assessed PFS was 16·7 and 13·8 months in the combination and monotherapy arms respectively [hazard ratio (HR) = 0·82; P = 0·1390]. Median overall survival (OS) was 58·2 and 51·8 months in the combination and monotherapy arms respectively (HR = 0·89, P = 0·4968). The safety profile was consistent with previous reports. Overall, 73% and 80% of patients in the combination and monotherapy arms, respectively, experienced a ≥grade 3 adverse event. The study did not meet its primary end-point. No significant improvement in PFS and OS was seen with the combination of ofatumumab and bendamustine as compared with bendamustine alone in rituximab-refractory iNHL (NCT01077518).

Pharmacokinetics and safety of subcutaneous pasireotide and intramuscular pasireotide long-acting release in Chinese male healthy volunteers: a phase I, single-center, open-label, randomized study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and safety of single and multiple doses of subcutaneous (SC) pasireotide and a single-dose intramuscular (IM) long-acting release (LAR) formulation of pasireotide in Chinese healthy volunteers (HVs) versus the PK properties in Western HVs (pooled from previous PK studies).

METHODS

In this phase I, single-center, open-label study, 45 Chinese male HVs were evenly randomized to 1 to 9 treatment sequences: each volunteer received a single dose of 300, 600, or 900 μg of pasireotide SC on day 1, followed by administration of the same dose BID from day 15 to the morning of day 19, and then a single IM dose of 20, 40, or 60 mg of pasireotide LAR on day 33. The PK parameters were assessed with noncompartmental analysis. Statistical comparison of PK parameters, including AUC, Cmax, and CL/F from both formulations, was made for Chinese versus Western male HVs. The safety profile was also assessed. Metabolic parameters, including blood glucose, insulin, and glucagon, and measures that reflect the effects of pasireotide LAR on relatively long-term glucose control, lipid metabolism, and systemic concentrations of pancreatic enzymes and thyrotropin were evaluated.

FINDINGS

Of the 45 randomized HVs, 42 completed the study per protocol, 1 withdrew his informed consent for personal reasons, and 2 prematurely discontinued the study because of adverse events (AEs). Concentration-time and safety profiles of both formulations were similar to those reported in Western HVs. Mean geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Chinese versus Western HVs ranged from 0.79 to 1.42. For most primary PK parameters, 90% CIs for GMRs were within a predefined ethnic insensitivity interval (90% CI, 0.70-1.43). After considering age and weight as covariates in the statistical model, the GMRs and 90% CIs for other PK parameters were within the predefined interval (Cmax in single-dose SC administration) or significantly decreased (Cmin,ss in multiple BID SC doses and first peak Cmax in the single-dose LAR formulation). No serious AEs were reported. Both formulations were well tolerated; pasireotide SC caused transient changes in glucose metabolism. Owing to the differential binding affinity to the somatostatin receptor subtypes, pasireotide LAR elicited a concentration-dependent increase of fasting blood glucose, substantial reduction in triglyceride, and a mild decrease in cholesterol. The most frequently reported AEs after single-dose and multiple-dose pasireotide SC were injection site reaction, nausea, dizziness, and diarrhea; most HVs developed diarrhea with single-dose pasireotide LAR.

IMPLICATIONS

The pasireotide formulations had similar PK and safety profiles between Chinese and Western male HVs. Thus, no ethnic sensitivity was found for pasireotide SC or LAR.

Long-term follow-up of renal function after peptide receptor radiation therapy with (90)Y-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)-octreotide and (177)Lu-DOTA(0), Tyr(3)-octreotate

The kidneys are critical organs in peptide receptor radiation therapy (PRRT). Renal function loss may become apparent many years after PRRT. We analyzed the time course of decline in creatinine clearance (CLR) in patients during a follow-up of at least 18 mo after the start of PRRT with (90)Y-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid (DOTA),Tyr(3)-octreotide ((90)Y-DOTATOC) or (177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)-octreotate ((177)Lu-DOTATATE).

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with metastasized neuroendocrine tumors received 1-5 cycles of (90)Y-DOTATOC, leading to renal radiation doses of 5.9-26.9 Gy per cycle and a total of 18.3-38.7 Gy. Median follow-up was 2.9 y (range, 1.5-5.4 y), with a median of 16 measurements (range, 5-53) per patient. Thirty-seven patients with metastasized neuroendocrine tumors received 3-7 cycles of (177)Lu-DOTATATE, leading to renal radiation doses of 1.8-7.8 Gy per cycle and a total of 7.3-26.7 Gy. Median follow-up was 2.4 y (range, 1.7-4.0 y), with a median of 10 (range, 6-27) measurements per patient. All renal dose estimates were calculated with the MIRDOSE3 model. All patients were infused with renoprotective amino acids during the administration of the radioactive peptides. The time trend of CLR was determined by fitting a monoexponential function through the data of individual patients, yielding the decline in CLR in terms of percentage change per year.

RESULTS

The median decline in CLR was 7.3% per y in patients treated with (90)Y-DOTATOC and 3.8% per y in patients treated with (177)Lu-DOTATATE (P = 0.06). The time trend of decline in CLR was sustained during the follow-up period. Eleven patients had a >15% per y decline in CLR. Cumulative renal radiation dose, per-cycle renal radiation dose, age, hypertension, and diabetes are probable contributing factors to the rate of decline in CLR after PRRT.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the time course of CLR after PRRT was compatible with the pattern of sustained CLR loss in progressive chronic kidney disease.

Brief courses of palliative radiotherapy for metastatic bone pain: a pilot cost-minimization comparison with narcotic analgesics

The use of radiotherapy to treat metastatic bone pain is being challenged by claims of high cost and by more readily available, noninvasive treatment approaches. The authors assessed the effectiveness of brief courses of radiotherapy in reducing pain and estimated cost data for a pilot comparison between radiotherapy and narcotic analgesics in patients with cancer. A representative group of outpatients undergoing brief courses of radiotherapy with Karnofsky scores above 70 and without serious comorbidities were recruited from 1995 through 1996. Patients indicated their pain at rest and with movement on a scale of from 1 to 10 both before and up to 12 months after radiotherapy. Radiotherapy costs were estimated from Medicare-allowable charges. Narcotic analgesia costs were estimated from published values. In 66 patients with 131 individually treated sites, median at rest pain score decreased by about 4 points after treatment (5.58 [-/+3.28] before treatment vs. 1.55 [-/+1.8] after treatment; p < 0.05). Median with movement pain score was about 5 points lower after treatment (7.32 [-/+2.72] before treatment vs. 1.94 [-/+2.07] after treatment; p < 0.05). No differences were found when stratifying by type of pain, tumor histologic type, or skeletal site. The estimated cost per patient ranged from $1,200 to $2,500 for radiotherapy. This compares with an estimated cost of $9,000 to $36,000 for 9 months of narcotics. In this pilot study, a brief course of radiotherapy significantly reduced pain and appeared to be cost effective when compared with narcotic analgesia. A full economic evaluation is warranted.