1
|
Sasson J, Moreau GB, Petri WA. The role of interleukin 13 and the type 2 immune pathway in COVID-19: A review. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2023; 130:727-732. [PMID: 36924937 PMCID: PMC10014128 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
Although much has been learned about severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 since December 2019, uneven global vaccine distribution, rapid viral spread, and variant evasion of preventative measures have led to its persistence in the population for the foreseeable future. Additional therapies are needed to support patients through their acute, immune-mediated disease process that continues to lead to considerable morbidity and mortality. Data revealing the involvement of type 2 immune pathway in acute coronavirus disease 2019 and post-recovery conditions represent a potential additional area for intervention. Herein, we review the current understanding of interleukin 13 in acute severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, the clinical outcomes associated with type 2 immune processes, and the impact of type 2 blockade on acute and long-term coronavirus disease 2019 conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Sasson
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - G Brett Moreau
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - William A Petri
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia; Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Cancer Biology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia; Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sasson J, Donlan AN, Ma JZ, Haughey HM, Coleman R, Nayak U, Mathers AJ, Laverdure S, Dewar R, Jackson PEH, Heysell SK, Sturek JM, Petri WA. Safety and Efficacy of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients With Moderate to Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Phase 2a Trial. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022; 9:ofac343. [PMID: 35959207 PMCID: PMC9361171 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Based on studies implicating the type 2 cytokine interleukin 13 (IL-13) as a potential contributor to critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), this trial was designed as an early phase 2 study to assess dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks IL-13 and interleukin 4 signaling, for treatment of inpatients with COVID-19. Methods We conducted a phase 2a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT04920916) to assess the safety and efficacy of dupilumab plus standard of care vs placebo plus standard of care in mitigating respiratory failure and death in those hospitalized with COVID-19. Results Forty eligible subjects were enrolled from June to November of 2021. There was no statistically significant difference in adverse events nor in the primary endpoint of ventilator-free survival at day 28 between study arms. However, for the secondary endpoint of mortality at day 60, there were 2 deaths in the dupilumab group compared with 5 deaths in the placebo group (60-day survival: 89.5% vs 76.2%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.05 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .004-.72]; P = .03). Among subjects who were not in the intensive care unit (ICU) at randomization, 3 subjects in the dupilumab arm were admitted to the ICU compared to 6 in the placebo arm (17.7% vs 37.5%; adjusted HR, 0.44 [95% CI, .09-2.09]; P = .30). Last, we found evidence of type 2 signaling blockade in the dupilumab group through analysis of immune biomarkers over time. Conclusions Although the primary outcome of day 28 ventilator-free survival was not reached, adverse events were not observed and survival was higher in the dupilumab group by day 60. Clinical Trials Registration NCT04920916.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Sasson
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Alexandra N Donlan
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Cancer Biology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Jennie Z Ma
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Heather M Haughey
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Rachael Coleman
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Uma Nayak
- Center for Public Health Genomics and Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Amy J Mathers
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Sylvain Laverdure
- Laboratory of Human Retrovirology and Immunoinformatics, Frederick National Laboratory, Frederick, Maryland, USA
| | - Robin Dewar
- Virus Isolation and Serology Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory, Frederick, Maryland, USA
| | - Patrick E H Jackson
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Scott K Heysell
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Sturek
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - William A Petri
- Correspondence: William A. Petri Jr., MD, PhD, University of Virginia, 345 Crispell Drive, Charlottesville, VA 22908-1340, USA ()
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Young MK, Kornmeier C, Carpenter R, Natale N, Sasson J, Solga M, Mathers A, Poulter M, Qiang X, Petri WA. IgG Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Correlate with Days from Symptom Onset, Viral Load and IL-10. The Journal of Immunology 2021. [DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.206.supp.114.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has resulted in a pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Antibody testing is essential to identify persons exposed to the virus and potentially predicting immunity. 183 COVID-19 patients (68 mechanically ventilated) and 41 controls were tested for plasma IgG, IgA and IgM against the SARS-CoV-2 S1, S2, receptor binding domain (RBD) and N proteins using the MILLIPLEX® SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Panels. COVID-19 positive patients had high levels of IgG, IgA and IgM anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies against viral proteins. Sensitivity of anti-S1 IgG increased from 60% to 93% one week after symptom onset. S1-IgG and S1-IgA had specificities of 98%. Ventilated COVID-19 patients had higher antibody levels than the COVID-19 patients who were not ventilated. IgG antibody levels against S1 protein had the strongest correlation to days from symptom onset. We found that patients with the highest IgG levels had the lowest viral load. Finally, there was a correlation of high plasma IL-10 with low anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG.
Collapse
|