1
|
Faller J, Perez JK, Mihalopoulos C, Chatterton ML, Engel L, Lee YY, Le PH, Le LKD. Economic evidence for prevention and treatment of eating disorders: An updated systematic review. Int J Eat Disord 2024; 57:265-285. [PMID: 38111296 DOI: 10.1002/eat.24113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review updates an existing review examining the cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent and treat eating disorders (EDs). METHOD Literature search was conducted in Academic Search Complete, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EconLit, Global Health, ERIC, Health Business Elite, and Health Policy Reference Center electronic databases, capturing studies published between March 2017 to April 2023. Hand-searching was conducted as supplementary including gray literature search. Included articles were (1) full economic evaluations or return-on-investment studies, (2) in English and (3) aimed at prevention and treatment of any ED. Included studies were added and synthesized with previously reviewed studies. Screening and extraction followed PRISMA guidelines. Quality assessment was conducted using the Drummond checklist. PROSPERO registration CRD42021287464. RESULTS A total of 28 studies were identified, including 15 published after the previous review. There were nine prevention, seven anorexia nervosa (AN) treatment, five bulimia nervosa (BN) treatment, four binge-eating disorder (BED), and three non-specific ED treatment studies. Findings indicate value-for-money evidence supporting all interventions. Quality assessment showed studies were fair-to-good quality. DISCUSSION There has been significant growth in cost-effectiveness studies over the last 5 years. Findings suggest that interventions to prevent and treat ED offer value for money. Interventions such as Featback (ED prevention and non-specific ED treatment); focal psychodynamic therapy, enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy, and high-calorie refeeding (AN treatment); stepped-care with assisted self-help and internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (BN treatment); and cognitive behavioral therapy guided self-help intervention (BED treatment) have good quality economic evidence. Further research in implementation of interventions is required. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The increasing prevalence of ED globally has significant impact on healthcare systems, families, and society. This review is showcasing the value for money of interventions of eating disorders prevention and treatment. This review found that existing interventions offers positive economic benefit for the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Faller
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joahna Kevin Perez
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mary Lou Chatterton
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lidia Engel
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yong Yi Lee
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Wacol, Queensland, Australia
| | - Phuong Hong Le
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Long Khanh-Dao Le
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Higginbotham B, Perez JK, Louie E, Haber PS, Lubman D, Arunogiri S, Chatterton ML, Morley KC. Economic evaluations of alcohol pharmacotherapy: Systematic review of economic evaluations of pharmacotherapy for the treatment of alcohol use disorder. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2024; 58:117-133. [PMID: 37822267 PMCID: PMC10838482 DOI: 10.1177/00048674231201541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Alcohol use disorders confer a significant burden of disease and economic cost worldwide. However, the utilisation of pharmacotherapies to manage alcohol use disorder is poor. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of economic evaluation studies of alcohol use disorder pharmacotherapies. METHODS A search was conducted in Embase, Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO and EconLit (August 2019, updated September 2022). Full economic evaluations using pharmacotherapy to treat alcohol use disorders were included. Included studies were stratified by medication and summarised descriptively. The Consensus on Health Economic Criteria list was used to assess the methodological quality. RESULTS A total of 1139 studies were retrieved, of which 15 met the inclusion criteria. All studies were conducted in high-income countries. Four studies analysed nalmefene, four studies assessed acamprosate, three for naltrexone and four for stand-alone and/or combinations of naltrexone and acamprosate. There were 21 interventions synthesised from 15 studies as some studies evaluated multiple interventions and comparators. More than half of the included studies (73%) reported pharmacotherapy as dominant (less costly and more effective than comparators). From healthcare payer perspectives, five studies found that pharmacotherapy added to psychosocial support was dominant or cost-effective, accruing additional benefits at a higher cost but under accepted willingness to pay thresholds. Three analyses from a societal perspective found pharmacotherapy added to psychosocial support was a dominant or cost-effective strategy. Quality scores ranged from 63% to 95%. CONCLUSION Pharmacotherapy added to psychosocial support was cost-effective from both healthcare and societal perspectives, emphasising an increased role for pharmacotherapy to reduce the burden of alcohol use disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Higginbotham
- Specialty of Addiction Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Joahna Kevin Perez
- Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Eva Louie
- Specialty of Addiction Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul S Haber
- Specialty of Addiction Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Dan Lubman
- Monash Addiction Research Centre and Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Shalini Arunogiri
- Monash Addiction Research Centre and Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Mary Lou Chatterton
- Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Kirsten C Morley
- Specialty of Addiction Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thai TTH, Engel L, Perez JK, Tan EJ, Eades S, Sanci L, Mihalopoulos C. A systematic review of health state utility values and psychometric performance of generic preference-based instruments for children and adolescents with mental health problems. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:3005-3026. [PMID: 37237136 PMCID: PMC10522744 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03441-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
AIMS This paper aims to systematically identify reported health state utility values (HSUVs) in children and adolescents with mental health problems (MHPs) aged less than 25 years; to summarise the techniques used to elicit HSUVs; and to examine the psychometric performance of the identified multi-attribute utility instruments (MAUIs) used in this space. METHODS A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Peer-reviewed studies published in English, reporting HSUVs for children and adolescents with MHPs using direct or indirect valuation methods were searched in six databases. RESULTS We found 38 studies reporting HSUVs for 12 types of MHPs across 12 countries between 2005 and October 2021. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and depression are the most explored MHPs. Disruptive Behaviour Disorder was associated with the lowest reported HSUVs of 0.06 while cannabis use disorder was associated with the highest HSUVs of 0.88. Indirect valuation method through the use of MAUIs (95% of included studies) was the most frequently used approach, while direct valuation methods (Standard Gamble, Time Trade-Off) were only used to derive HSUVs in ADHD. This review found limited evidence of the psychometric performance of MAUIs used in children and adolescents with MHPs. CONCLUSION This review provides an overview of HSUVs of various MHPs, the current practice to generate HSUVs, and the psychometric performance of MAUIs used in children and adolescents with MHPs. It highlights the need for more rigorous and extensive psychometric assessments to produce evidence on the suitability of MAUIs used in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thao T H Thai
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 4, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
| | - Lidia Engel
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 4, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Joahna Kevin Perez
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 4, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Eng Joo Tan
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 4, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Sandra Eades
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, 780 Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Lena Sanci
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, 780 Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 4, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Faller J, Le LKD, Chatterton ML, Perez JK, Chiotelis O, Tran HNQ, Sultana M, Hall N, Lee YY, Chapman C, Newton N, Slade T, Sunderland M, Teesson M, Mihalopoulos C. A systematic review of economic evaluations for opioid misuse, cannabis and illicit drug use prevention. BJPsych Open 2023; 9:e149. [PMID: 37551098 PMCID: PMC10594094 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2023.515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Substance use disorders negatively affect global disease burden. Effective preventive interventions are available, but whether they provide value for money is unclear. AIMS This review looks at the cost-effectiveness evidence of preventive interventions for cannabis use, opioid misuse and illicit drug use. METHOD Literature search was undertaken in Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EconLit through EBSCOhost and EMBASE, up to May 2021. Grey literature search was conducted as supplement. Studies included were full economic evaluations or return-on-investment (ROI) analyses for preventing opioid misuse, cannabis and illicit drug use. English-language restriction was used. Outcomes extracted were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) or ROI ratios, with costs presented in 2019 United States dollars. Quality was assessed with the Drummond checklist. RESULTS Eleven full economic evaluation studies were identified from 5674 citations, with all studies conducted in high-income countries. Most aimed to prevent opioid misuse (n = 4), cannabis (n = 3) or illicit drug use (n = 5). Modelling was the predominant methodology (n = 7). Five evaluated school-based universal interventions targeting children and adolescents (aged <18 years). Five cost-benefit studies reported cost-savings. One cost-effectiveness and two cost-utility analysis studies supported the cost-effectiveness of interventions, as ICERs fell under prespecified value-for-money thresholds. CONCLUSIONS There are limited economic evaluations of preventive interventions for opioid misuse, cannabis and illicit drug use. Family-based intervention (ParentCorps), school-based interventions (Social and Emotional Training and Project ALERT) and a doctor's programme to assess patient risk of misusing narcotics ('the Network System to Prevent Doctor-Shopping for Narcotics') show promising cost-effectiveness and warrant consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Faller
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia
| | - Long Khanh-Dao Le
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia
| | - Mary Lou Chatterton
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia
| | - Joahna Kevin Perez
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia
| | - Oxana Chiotelis
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Australia
| | - Huong Ngoc Quynh Tran
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Australia
| | - Marufa Sultana
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Australia
| | - Natasha Hall
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Australia
| | - Yong Yi Lee
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia; School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Australia; and Policy and Epidemiology Group, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Wacol, Queensland, Australia
| | - Cath Chapman
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Nicola Newton
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Tim Slade
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Matt Sunderland
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Maree Teesson
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia; and Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Le LKD, Faller J, Chatterton ML, Perez JK, Chiotelis O, Tran HNQ, Sultana M, Hall N, Lee YY, Chapman C, Newton N, Slade T, Sunderland M, Teesson M, Mihalopoulos C. Interventions to prevent alcohol use: systematic review of economic evaluations. BJPsych Open 2023; 9:e117. [PMID: 37365798 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2023.81] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alcohol use is a leading risk factor for death and disability worldwide. AIMS We conducted a systematic review on the cost-effectiveness evidence for interventions to prevent alcohol use across the lifespan. METHOD Electronic databases (EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EconLit) were searched for full economic evaluations and return-on-investment studies of alcohol prevention interventions published up to May 2021. The methods and results of included studies were evaluated with narrative synthesis, and study quality was assessed by the Drummond ten-point checklist. RESULTS A total of 69 studies met the inclusion criteria for a full economic evaluation or return-on-investment study. Most studies targeted adults or a combination of age groups, seven studies comprised children/adolescents and one involved older adults. Half of the studies found that alcohol prevention interventions are cost-saving (i.e. more effective and less costly than the comparator). This was especially true for universal prevention interventions designed to restrict exposure to alcohol through taxation or advertising bans; and selective/indicated prevention interventions, which involve screening with or without brief intervention for at-risk adults. School-based interventions combined with parent/carer interventions were cost-effective in preventing alcohol use among those aged under 18 years. No interventions were cost-effective for preventing alcohol use in older adults. CONCLUSIONS Alcohol prevention interventions show promising evidence of cost-effectiveness. Further economic analyses are needed to facilitate policy-making in low- and middle-income countries, and among child, adolescent and older adult populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long Khanh-Dao Le
- PhD, Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia
| | - Jan Faller
- MHE, Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia
| | - Mary Lou Chatterton
- PharmD, Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia
| | - Joahna Kevin Perez
- MHE, Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia
| | - Oxana Chiotelis
- MHE, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Australia
| | - Huong Ngoc Quynh Tran
- MHE, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Australia
| | - Marufa Sultana
- PhD, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Australia
| | - Natasha Hall
- MHE, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Australia
| | - Yong Yi Lee
- PhD, Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia; School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Australia; and Policy and Epidemiology Group, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Australia
| | - Cath Chapman
- PhD, Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Nicola Newton
- PhD, Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Tim Slade
- PhD, Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Matt Sunderland
- PhD, Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Maree Teesson
- PhD, Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- PhD, Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Le LKD, Tan EJ, Perez JK, Chiotelis O, Hay P, Ananthapavan J, Lee YY, Mihalopoulos C. Prevention of high body mass index and eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eat Weight Disord 2022; 27:2989-3003. [PMID: 36029370 PMCID: PMC9803760 DOI: 10.1007/s40519-022-01458-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eating disorders (EDs) and high body mass index (BMI) are two important public health issues with significant health and cost impacts. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to establish whether interventions are effective in preventing both issues. METHODS Electronic databases were searched up to 10 May 2021. Studies were included if they were randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that evaluated a preventive intervention (regardless of its aim to prevent ED, high BMI or both) and reported both EDs and BMI-related outcomes. Both narrative synthesis and meta-analysis were used to synthesise the results. Publication bias was also investigated. RESULTS Fifty-four studies were included for analysis. The primary aim of the studies was ED prevention (n = 23), high BMI prevention (n = 21) and both ED and high BMI prevention (n = 10). Meta-analysis results indicated that preventive interventions had a significant effect on several ED outcomes including dieting, shape and weight concerns, body dissatisfaction, negative affect, eating disorder symptoms and internalization, with effect sizes ranging from - 0.16 (95% CI - 0.27, - 0.06) to - 0.61 (95% CI - 0.29, - 0.04). Despite several studies that demonstrated positive impacts on BMI, there was no significant effect on BMI-related measures in the meta-analysis. The risk of publication bias was low for the majority of the pooled effect results. CONCLUSION Preventive interventions were effective for either high BMI or EDs. However, there is limited evidence to show that current preventive interventions were effective in reducing both outcomes. Further research is necessary to explore the risk factors that are shared by these weight-related disorders as well as effective prevention interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level I: systematic review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long Khanh-Dao Le
- Health Economics Division, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Eng Joo Tan
- Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia
| | - Joahna Kevin Perez
- Health Economics Division, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Oxana Chiotelis
- Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia
| | - Phillipa Hay
- School of Medicine, Translational Health Research Institute (THRI), Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia
- Camden and Campbelltown Hospital, SWSLHD, Campbelltown, NSW, 2560, Australia
| | - Jaithri Ananthapavan
- Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia
- Global Obesity Centre, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia
| | - Yong Yi Lee
- Health Economics Division, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia
- Policy and Epidemiology Group, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Wacol, QLD, 4076, Australia
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- Health Economics Division, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|