1
|
Steyn PS, Boydell V, Contractor S, Cordero JP, Ruano AL. Social accountability and sexual and reproductive health-implications for research and practice. Int J Equity Health 2024; 21:205. [PMID: 38191465 PMCID: PMC10773071 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-02081-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Petrus S Steyn
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development of Sexual and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Victoria Boydell
- Institute of Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sana Contractor
- Centre for International Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, University of Bergen Norway, Antwerp, Belgium
- COPASAH, New Delhi, India
- The George Institute for Global Health New Delhi, New Delhi, India
| | - Joanna Paula Cordero
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development of Sexual and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ana Lorena Ruano
- Center for International Health, Department of Global Public Health & Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kriel Y, Milford C, Cordero JP, Suleman F, Steyn PS, Smit JA. A continuum of individual-level factors that influence modern contraceptive uptake and use: perspectives from community members and healthcare providers in Durban, South Africa. Contracept Reprod Med 2023; 8:47. [PMID: 37789390 PMCID: PMC10548747 DOI: 10.1186/s40834-023-00247-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND South Africa faces numerous sexual and reproductive health challenges that can be mitigated with contraceptive use. Contraceptive use is defined and measured as use, non-use, or discontinued use. Research has shown that there are expanded definitions of use beyond these categories. Identifying such categories may assist in a better understanding of factors that influence contraceptive use. SETTING AND METHODOLOGY This qualitative study was conducted in the eThekwini Municipality in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. The aim was to explore the factors influencing the uptake and use of modern contraception. One hundred and twenty-seven participants were enrolled in this study. One hundred and three of those were community members, and twenty-five were healthcare providers. Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews were conducted to gather the data. Data analysis was facilitated using NVivo 10 software. RESULTS The data show that numerous factors influence contraceptive uptake and use. From these factors, a continuum of use that captures a variety of states of use emerged. Five different states of use were uncovered: no-use, vulnerable use, compelled use, conditional use, and autonomous use. The development of the model illustrates the complexity of contraceptive needs and that it extends beyond definitions found in policies and large-scale surveys. Expanding conceptions of use can aid in developing counselling and information support tools that can improve the uptake and continued use of modern contraception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolandie Kriel
- WWMRU (Wits MatCH Research Unit), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa.
- School of Public Health and Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
| | - Cecilia Milford
- WWMRU (Wits MatCH Research Unit), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa
| | - Joanna Paula Cordero
- UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Fatima Suleman
- Discipline of Pharmaceutical Science, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville, South Africa
| | - Petrus S Steyn
- UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jennifer Ann Smit
- WWMRU (Wits MatCH Research Unit), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boydell V, Steyn PS, Cordero JP, Habib N, Nguyen MH, Nai D, Shamba D, Fuseini K, Mrema S, Kiarie J. The role of social accountability in changing service users' values, attitudes, and interactions with the health services: a pre-post study. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:957. [PMID: 37674164 PMCID: PMC10481471 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09971-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of community engagement through social accountability on service users' values, attitudes and interactions. We conducted a pre-post study of the community and provider driven social accountability intervention (CaPSAI) over a 12-month period among 1,500 service users in 8 health facilites in Ghana and in Tanzania (n = 3,000).In both countries, there were significant improvements in women's participation in household decision-making and in how service users' perceive their treatment by health workers. In both settings, however, there was a decline in women's knowledge of rights, perception of service quality, awareness of accountability mechanisms and collective efficacy in the community. Though CaPSAI intervention set out to change the values, attitudes, and interactions between community members and those providing contraceptive services, there were changes in different directions that require closer examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Boydell
- Institute of Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Petrus S Steyn
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| | - Joanna Paula Cordero
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| | - Ndema Habib
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| | - My Huong Nguyen
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| | - Dela Nai
- Population Council, 204 Yiyiwa Drive, Abelemkpe, Accra, Ghana
| | - Donat Shamba
- Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O.BOX 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Kamil Fuseini
- Population Council, 204 Yiyiwa Drive, Abelemkpe, Accra, Ghana
| | - Sigilbert Mrema
- Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O.BOX 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - James Kiarie
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Steyn PS, Cordero JP, Nai D, Shamba D, Fuseini K, Mrema S, Habib N, Nguyen MH, Kiarie J. The impact of community and provider-driven social accountability interventions on contraceptive use: findings from a cohort study of new users in Ghana and Tanzania. Int J Equity Health 2023; 22:167. [PMID: 37641059 PMCID: PMC10464246 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-01928-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although contraceptive use has increased over 15 years, discontinuation rates remain high. Contraceptive use is becoming more important when addressing unmet need for family planning. Social accountability, defined here as collective processes for holding duty bearers to account for their actions, is a rights-based participatory process that supports service provision and person-centred care, as well as, informed decision-making among community members regarding their health. A study implemented in Ghana and Tanzania was designed to understand and evaluate how social accountability and participatory processes influences quality of care and client satisfaction and whether this results in increased contraceptive uptake and use. We report here on the relationship between social accountability and the use of modern contraceptives, i.e., contraceptive method discontinuation, contraceptive method switching, and contraceptive discontinuation. METHODS As part of Community and Provider driven Social Accountability Intervention (CaPSAI) Project, a cohort of women aged 15 to 49 years who were new users of contraception and accessing family planning and contraceptives services at the study facilities across both intervention and control groups were followed-up over a 12-month period to measure changes contraceptive use. RESULTS In this cohort study over a one-year duration, we did not find a statistically significant difference in Ghana and Tanzania in overall method discontinuation, switching, and contraceptive discontinuation after exposure to a social accountability intervention. In Ghana but not in Tanzania, when stratified by the type of facility (district level vs. health centre), there were significantly less method and contraceptive discontinuation in the district level facility and significantly more method and contraceptive discontinuation in the health centres in the intervention group. In Ghana, the most important reasons reported for stopping a method were fear of side-effects, health concerns and wanting to become pregnant in the control group and fear of side-effects wanting a more effective method and infrequent sex in the intervention group. In Tanzania, the most important reasons reported for stopping a method were fear of side-effects, wanting a more effective method, and method not available in the control group compared to wanting a more effective method, fear of side-effects and health concerns in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS We did not demonstrate a statistically significant impact of a six-month CaPSAI intervention on contraceptives use among new users in Tanzania and Ghana. However, since social accountability have important impacts beyond contraceptive use it is important consider results of the intermediate outcomes, cases of change, and process evaluation to fully understand the impact of this intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION The CaPSAI Project has been registered at Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619000378123, 11/03/2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petrus S Steyn
- Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Avenue Appia 20, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Joanna Paula Cordero
- Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Avenue Appia 20, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Dela Nai
- Population Council, 204 Yiyiwa Drive, Abelemkpe, Accra, Ghana
| | - Donat Shamba
- Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O.BOX 78373, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Kamil Fuseini
- Population Council, 204 Yiyiwa Drive, Abelemkpe, Accra, Ghana
| | - Sigilbert Mrema
- Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O.BOX 78373, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Ndema Habib
- Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Avenue Appia 20, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - My Huong Nguyen
- Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Avenue Appia 20, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - James Kiarie
- Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Avenue Appia 20, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kriel Y, Milford C, Cordero JP, Suleman F, Steyn PS, Smit JA. Access to public sector family planning services and modern contraceptive methods in South Africa: A qualitative evaluation from community and health care provider perspectives. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0282996. [PMID: 36930610 PMCID: PMC10022780 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Progress has been made to improve access to family planning services and contraceptive methods, yet many women still struggle to access contraception, increasing their risk for unintended pregnancy. This is also true for South Africa, where over fifty per cent of pregnancies are reported as unintended, even though contraception is freely available. There is also stagnation in the fertility rate indicators and contraceptive use data, indicating that there may be challenges to accessing contraception. This paper explores the evaluation of access to contraception from community and health care provider perspectives. This qualitative study explored factors affecting the uptake and use of contraception through focus group discussions (n = 14), in-depth interviews (n = 8), and drawings. Participants included male and female community members (n = 103) between 15 and 49 years of age, health care providers (n = 16), and key stakeholder informants (n = 8), with a total number of 127 participants. Thematic content analysis was used to explore the data using NVivo 10. Emergent themes were elucidated and thematically categorised. The results were categorised according to a priori access components. Overall, the results showed that the greatest obstacle to accessing contraception was the accommodation component. This included the effects of integrated care, long waiting times, and limited operational hours-all of which contributed to the discontinuation of contraception. Community members reported being satisfied with the accessibility and affordability components but less satisfied with the availability of trained providers and a variety of contraceptive methods. The accessibility and affordability themes also revealed the important role that individual agency and choice in service provider plays in accessing contraception. Data from the illustrations showed that adolescent males experienced the most geographic barriers. This study illustrated the importance of examining access as a holistic concept and to assess each component's influence on contraceptive uptake and use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolandie Kriel
- MRU (MatCH Research Unit), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa
- School of Public Health and Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- * E-mail:
| | - Cecilia Milford
- MRU (MatCH Research Unit), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa
| | - Joanna Paula Cordero
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Fatima Suleman
- Discipline of Pharmaceutical Science, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville, South Africa
| | - Petrus S. Steyn
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jennifer Ann Smit
- MRU (MatCH Research Unit), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cordero JP, Mochache V, Boydell V, Addah MA, McMullen H, Monyo A, Mrema S, Nai D, Shamba D, Steyn PS. Research and implementation interactions in a social accountability study: utilizing guidance for conducting process evaluations of complex interventions. Int J Equity Health 2022; 21:153. [PMID: 36329485 PMCID: PMC9632007 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-022-01718-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, researchers and evaluators have made efforts to identify and use appropriate and innovative research designs that account for the complexity in studying social accountability. The relationship between the researchers and those implementing the activities and how this impacts the study have received little attention. In this paper, we reflect on how we managed the relationship between researchers and implementers using the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance on process evaluation of a complex intervention. MAIN BODY The MRC guidance focuses on three areas of interaction between researchers and stakeholders involved in developing and delivering the intervention: (i) working with program developers and implementers; (ii) communication of emerging findings between researchers/evaluators and implementers; and (iii) overlapping roles of the intervention and research/evaluation. We summarize how the recommendations for each of the three areas were operationalized in the Community and Provider driven Social Accountability Intervention (CaPSAI) Project and provide reflections based on experience. We co-developed various tools, including standard operating procedures, contact lists, and manuals. Activities such as training sessions, regular calls, and meetings were also conducted to enable a good working relationship between the different partners. CONCLUSIONS Studying social accountability requires the collaboration of multiple partners that need to be planned to ensure a good working relationship while safeguarding both the research and intervention implementation. The MRC guidance is a useful tool for making interaction issues explicit and establishing procedures. Planning procedures for dealing with research and implementers' interactions could be more comprehensive and better adapted to social accountability interventions if both researchers and implementers are involved. There is a need for social accountability research to include clear statements explaining the nature and types of relationships between researchers and implementers involved in the intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Paula Cordero
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development of Sexual and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Vernon Mochache
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development of Sexual and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Victoria Boydell
- School of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Heather McMullen
- Global Health Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Sigilbert Mrema
- Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Dela Nai
- Population Council Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | - Donat Shamba
- Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Petrus S Steyn
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development of Sexual and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McMullen H, Boydell V, Cordero JP, Steyn PS, Kiarie J, Kinemo P, Monyo A, Addah MA, Ahuno JT, Gyamfi OB. Accounting for complexity - Intervention design in the context of studying social accountability for reproductive health. Gates Open Res 2022; 5:107. [PMID: 35967957 PMCID: PMC9352917 DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13260.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Social accountability interventions aim to propel change by raising community voices and holding duty bearers accountable for delivering on rights and entitlements. Evidence on the role of such interventions for improving community health outcomes is steadily emerging, including for sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR). However, these interventions are complex social processes with numerous actors, multiple components, and a highly influential local context. Unsurprisingly, determining the mechanisms of change and what outcomes may be transferable to other similar settings can be a challenge. We report our methodological considerations to account for complexity in a social accountability intervention exploring contraceptive uptake and use in Ghana and Tanzania. Main Body: The Community and Provider driven Social Accountability Intervention (CaPSAI) study explores the relationship between a health facility-focused social accountability intervention and contraceptive service provision in two countries. This 24-month mixed-method quasi-experimental study, using an interrupted time series with a parallel control group, is being undertaken in 16 sites across Ghana and Tanzania in collaboration with local research and implementation partners. The primary outcomes include changes in contraceptive uptake and use. We also measure outcomes related to current social accountability theories of change and undertake a process evaluation. We present three design components: aspects of co-design, 'conceptual' fidelity, and how we aim to track the intervention as 'intended vs. implemented' to explore how the intervention could be responsive to the embedded routines, local contextual realities, and the processual nature of the social accountability intervention. Conclusions: Through a discussion of these design components and their rationale, we conclude by suggesting approaches to intervention design that may go some way in responding to recent challenges in accounting for social accountability interventions, bearing relevance for evaluating health system interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather McMullen
- Centre for Global Health, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK
| | - Victoria Boydell
- Global Health Centre, Geneva Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
- Global Public Health, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, UK
| | - Joanna Paula Cordero
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| | - Petrus S. Steyn
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| | - James Kiarie
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
McMullen H, Boydell V, Cordero JP, Steyn PS, Kiarie J, Kinemo P, Monyo A, Addah MA, Ahuno JT, Gyamfi OB. Accounting for complexity – Intervention design in the context of studying social accountability for reproductive health. Gates Open Res 2022; 5:107. [PMID: 35967957 PMCID: PMC9352917 DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13260.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Social accountability interventions aim to propel change by raising community voices and holding duty bearers accountable for delivering on rights and entitlements. Evidence on the role of such interventions for improving community health outcomes is steadily emerging, including for sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR). However, these interventions are complex social processes with numerous actors, multiple components, and a highly influential local context. Unsurprisingly, determining the mechanisms of change and what outcomes may be transferable to other similar settings can be a challenge. We report our methodological considerations to account for complexity in a social accountability intervention exploring contraceptive uptake and use in Ghana and Tanzania. Main Body: The Community and Provider driven Social Accountability Intervention (CaPSAI) study explores the relationship between a health facility-focused social accountability intervention and contraceptive service provision in two countries. This 24-month mixed-method quasi-experimental study, using an interrupted time series with a parallel control group, is being undertaken in 16 sites across Ghana and Tanzania in collaboration with local research and implementation partners. The primary outcomes include changes in contraceptive uptake and use. We also measure outcomes related to current social accountability theories of change and undertake a process evaluation. We present three design components: aspects of co-design, ‘conceptual’ fidelity, and how we aim to track the intervention as ‘intended vs. implemented’ to explore how the intervention could be responsive to the embedded routines, local contextual realities, and the processual nature of the social accountability intervention. Conclusions: Through a discussion of these design components and their rationale, we conclude by suggesting approaches to intervention design that may go some way in responding to recent challenges in accounting for social accountability interventions, bearing relevance for evaluating health system interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather McMullen
- Centre for Global Health, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK
| | - Victoria Boydell
- Global Health Centre, Geneva Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
- Global Public Health, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, UK
| | - Joanna Paula Cordero
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| | - Petrus S. Steyn
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| | - James Kiarie
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kriel Y, Milford C, Cordero JP, Suleman F, Steyn PS, Smit JA. Quality of care in public sector family planning services in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: a qualitative evaluation from community and health care provider perspectives. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1246. [PMID: 34789232 PMCID: PMC8600736 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07247-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality of care is a multidimensional concept that forms an integral part of the uptake and use of modern contraceptive methods. Satisfaction with services is a significant factor in the continued use of services. While much is known about quality of care in the general public health care service, little is known about family planning specific quality of care in South Africa. This paper aims to fill the gap in the research by using the Bruce-Jain family planning quality of care framework. METHODS This formative qualitative study was conducted in South Africa, Zambia, and Kenya to explore the uptake of family planning and contraception. The results presented in this paper are from the South African data. Fourteen focus group discussions, twelve with community members and two with health care providers, were conducted along with eight in-depth interviews with key informants. Thematic content analysis using the Bruce-Jain Quality of Care framework was conducted to analyse this data using NVIVO 10. RESULTS Family planning quality of care was defined by participants as the quality of contraceptive methods, attitudes of health care providers, and outcomes of contraceptive use. The data showed that women have limited autonomy in their choice to either use contraception or the method that they might prefer. Important elements that relate to quality of care were identified and described by participants and grouped according to the structural or process components of the framework. Structure-related sub-themes identified included the lack of technically trained providers; integration of services that contributed to long waiting times and mixing of a variety of clients; and poor infrastructure. Sub-themes raised under the process category included poor interpersonal relations; lack of counselling/information exchange, fear; and time constraints. Neither providers nor users discussed follow up mechanisms which is a key aspect to ensure continuity of contraceptive use. CONCLUSION Using a qualitative methodology and applying the Bruce-Jain Quality of Care framework provided key insights into perceptions and challenges about family planning quality of care. Identifying which components are specific to family planning is important for improving contraceptive outcomes. In particular, autonomy in user choice of contraceptive method, integration of services, and the acceptability of overall family planning care was raised as areas of concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolandie Kriel
- MRU (MatCH Research Unit), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa.
- School of Public Health and Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
| | - Cecilia Milford
- MRU (MatCH Research Unit), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa
| | - Joanna Paula Cordero
- UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Fatima Suleman
- Discipline of Pharmaceutical Science, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville, Durban, South Africa
| | - Petrus S Steyn
- UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jennifer Ann Smit
- MRU (MatCH Research Unit), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nkole T, Silumbwe A, Munakampe MN, Cordero JP, Milford C, Zulu JM, Steyn PS. Community and health provider perspectives on the quality of family planning and contraceptive services in Kabwe District, Zambia. Sex Reprod Health Matters 2021; 29:1985945. [PMID: 34747352 PMCID: PMC8583990 DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1985945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Quality family planning and contraceptive (FP/C) services result in positive outcomes such as client satisfaction and sustained use of contraceptives. While most assessments of quality in FP/C services are based on measurable reproductive health outcomes, there is limited consideration of the perspectives and experiences of health providers and community members. This study aimed to address this knowledge gap, by exploring health providers’ and community perspectives on the elements of quality FP/C services in Kabwe district, Zambia. Fourteen focus group discussions and 10 in-depth interviews were conducted in October–December 2016, involving community members, key community stakeholders such as religious and political leaders, health committee members and frontline and managerial healthcare providers. Data were analysed using a thematic approach. According to study participants, quality FP/C services would include provision by skilled personnel with positive attitudes towards clients, availability of preferred methods and affordable products. Additional factors included appropriate infrastructure, especially counselling services spaces and adequate consultation time. Participants stressed the need for reduced waiting time and opportunity for self-expression. The efficiency and effectiveness of service delivery factors, such as information dissemination and community engagement, were also considered important elements of quality FP/C. This study underscores the value of considering both community and health provider perspectives in efforts to improve the quality of FP/C services, with the overall aim of increasing client satisfaction and sustained utilisation. However, service delivery processes must also be addressed in addition to providing for community participation, if quality is to be achieved in FP/C services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Nkole
- UPTAKE Local Principal Investigator, Gynaecologist, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Levy Mwanawasa Medical University (LMMU), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Adam Silumbwe
- UPTAKE Data Associate, Lecturer/Researcher, Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, P.O Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia. Correspondence:
| | - Margarate N Munakampe
- UPTAKE Data Associate, Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, P.O Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Joanna Paula Cordero
- UPTAKE Coordinator, Researcher, UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research (SRH), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Cecilia Milford
- UPTAKE Qualitative Lead, Researcher, MRU (MatCH Research Unit), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa
| | - Joseph Mumba Zulu
- UPTAKE Data Associate, Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, P.O Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Petrus S Steyn
- UPTAKE Coordinator, Researcher, UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research (SRH), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Habib N, Steyn PS, Boydell V, Cordero JP, Nguyen MH, Thwin SS, Nai D, Shamba D, Kiarie J. The use of segmented regression for evaluation of an interrupted time series study involving complex intervention: the CaPSAI project experience. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol 2021; 21:188-205. [PMID: 34720688 PMCID: PMC8550724 DOI: 10.1007/s10742-020-00221-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
An interrupted time series with a parallel control group (ITS-CG) design is a powerful quasi-experimental design commonly used to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention, on accelerating uptake of useful public health products, and can be used in the presence of regularly collected data. This paper illustrates how a segmented Poisson model that utilizes general estimating equations (GEE) can be used for the ITS-CG study design to evaluate the effectiveness of a complex social accountability intervention on the level and rate of uptake of modern contraception. The intervention was gradually rolled-out over time to targeted intervention communities in Ghana and Tanzania, with control communities receiving standard of care, as per national guidelines. Two ITS GEE segmented regression models are proposed for evaluating of the uptake. The first, a two-segmented model, fits the data collected during pre-intervention and post-intervention excluding that collected during intervention roll-out. The second, a three-segmented model, fits all data including that collected during the roll-out. A much simpler difference-in-difference (DID) GEE Poisson regression model is also illustrated. Mathematical formulation of both ITS-segmented Poisson models and that of the DID Poisson model, interpretation and significance of resulting regression parameters, and accounting for different sources of variation and lags in intervention effect are respectively discussed. Strengths and limitations of these models are highlighted. Segmented ITS modelling remains valuable for studying the effect of intervention interruptions whether gradual changes, over time, in the level or trend in uptake of public health practices are attributed by the introduced intervention. Trial Registration: The Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials registry. Trial registration number: ACTRN12619000378123. Trial Registration date: 11-March-2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ndema Habib
- The UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Petrus S. Steyn
- The UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Victoria Boydell
- Global Health Centre, Geneva Graduate Institute, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Joanna Paula Cordero
- The UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - My Huong Nguyen
- The UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Soe Soe Thwin
- The UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Dela Nai
- Population Council, Abelemkpe, Accra, Ghana
| | - Donat Shamba
- Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - James Kiarie
- The UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), Geneva, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Steyn PS, Boydell V, Cordero JP, McMullen H, Habib N, Nguyen TMH, Nai D, Shamba D, Kiarie J. Rationale and design of a complex intervention measuring the impact and processes of social accountability applied to contraceptive programming: CaPSAI Project. Gates Open Res 2020; 4:26. [PMID: 33134856 PMCID: PMC7541905 DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13075.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: There are numerous barriers leading to a high unmet need for family planning and contraceptives (FP/C). These include limited knowledge and information, poor access to quality services, structural inefficiencies in service provision and inadequately trained and supervised health professionals. Recently, social accountability programs have shown promising results in addressing barriers to accessing sexual and reproductive health services. As a highly complex participatory process with multiple and interrelated components, steps and actors, studying social accountability poses methodological challenges. The Community and Provider driven Social Accountability Intervention (CaPSAI) Project study protocol was developed to measure the impact of a social accountability intervention on contraceptive uptake and use and to understand the mechanisms and contextual factors that influence and generate these effects (with emphasis on health services actors and community members). Methods: CaPSAI Project is implementing a social accountability intervention where service users and providers assess the quality of local FP/C services and jointly identify ways to improve the delivery and quality of such services. In the project, a quasi-experimental study utilizing an interrupted time series design with a control group is conducted in eight intervention and eight control facilities in each study country, which are Ghana and Tanzania. A cross-sectional survey of service users and health care providers is used to measure social accountability outcomes, and a cohort of women who are new users of FP/C is followed up after the completion of the intervention to measure contraceptive use and continuation. The process evaluation utilizes a range of methods and data sources to enable a fuller description of how the findings were produced. Conclusion: This complex study design could provide researchers and implementers with the means to better measure and understand the mechanisms and contextual factors that influence social accountability processes in reproductive health, adding important findings to the evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petrus S Steyn
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| | - Victoria Boydell
- Global Health Centre, Geneva Graduate Institute, Maison de la Paix, Chemin Eugène-Rigot 2A, Case Postale 1672, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
| | - Joanna Paula Cordero
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| | - Heather McMullen
- Centre for Global Public Health, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK
| | - Ndema Habib
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| | - Thi My Huong Nguyen
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| | - Dela Nai
- Population Council, 204 Yiyiwa Drive, Abelemkpe, Accra, Ghana
| | - Donat Shamba
- Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O.BOX 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - James Kiarie
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| | - CaPSAI Project
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
- Global Health Centre, Geneva Graduate Institute, Maison de la Paix, Chemin Eugène-Rigot 2A, Case Postale 1672, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
- Centre for Global Public Health, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK
- Population Council, 204 Yiyiwa Drive, Abelemkpe, Accra, Ghana
- Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O.BOX 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Steyn PS, Boydell V, Cordero JP, McMullen H, Habib N, Nguyen TMH, Nai D, Shamba D, Kiarie J. Rationale and design of a complex intervention measuring the impact and processes of social accountability applied to contraceptive programming: CaPSAI Project. Gates Open Res 2020; 4:26. [PMID: 33134856 PMCID: PMC7541905 DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13075.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: There are numerous barriers leading to a high unmet need for family planning and contraceptives (FP/C). These include limited knowledge and information, poor access to quality services, structural inefficiencies in service provision and inadequately trained and supervised health professionals. Recently, social accountability programs have shown promising results in addressing barriers to accessing sexual and reproductive health services. As a highly complex participatory process with multiple and interrelated components, steps and actors, studying social accountability poses methodological challenges. The Community and Provider driven Social Accountability Intervention (CaPSAI) Project study protocol was developed to measure the impact of a social accountability intervention on contraceptive uptake and use and to understand the mechanisms and contextual factors that influence and generate these effects (with emphasis on health services actors and community members). Methods: CaPSAI Project is implementing a social accountability intervention where service users and providers assess the quality of local FP/C services and jointly identify ways to improve the delivery and quality of such services. In the project, a quasi-experimental study utilizing an interrupted time series design with a control group is conducted in eight intervention and eight control facilities in each study country, which are Ghana and Tanzania. A cross-sectional survey of service users and health care providers is used to measure social accountability outcomes, and a cohort of women who are new users of FP/C is followed up after the completion of the intervention to measure contraceptive use and continuation. The process evaluation utilizes a range of methods and data sources to enable a fuller description of how the findings were produced. Conclusion: This complex study design could provide researchers and implementers with the means to better measure and understand the mechanisms and contextual factors that influence social accountability processes in reproductive health, adding important findings to the evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petrus S Steyn
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| | - Victoria Boydell
- Global Health Centre, Geneva Graduate Institute, Maison de la Paix, Chemin Eugène-Rigot 2A, Case Postale 1672, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
| | - Joanna Paula Cordero
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| | - Heather McMullen
- Centre for Global Public Health, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK
| | - Ndema Habib
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| | - Thi My Huong Nguyen
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| | - Dela Nai
- Population Council, 204 Yiyiwa Drive, Abelemkpe, Accra, Ghana
| | - Donat Shamba
- Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O.BOX 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - James Kiarie
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Boydell V, Steyn PS, Cordero JP, Habib N, Nguyen MH, Nai D, Shamba D. Adaptation and validation of social accountability measures in the context of contraceptive services in Ghana and Tanzania. Int J Equity Health 2020; 19:183. [PMID: 33059681 PMCID: PMC7565324 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-020-01286-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Changes in the values, attitudes, and interactions of both service users and health care providers are central to social accountability processes in reproductive health. However, there is little consensus on how best to measure these latent changes. This paper reports on the adaptation and validation of measures that capture these changes in Tanzania and Ghana. METHODS The CaPSAI theory of change determined the dimensions of the measure, and we adapted existing items for the survey items. Trained data collectors used a survey to collect data from 752 women in Tanzania and 750 women in Ghana attending contraceptive services. We used reliability analysis, exploratory, and confirmatory factor analysis to assess the validity and reliability of these measures in each country. RESULTS The measure has high construct validity and reliability in both countries. We identified several subscales in both countries, 10 subscales in Tanzania, and 11 subscales in Ghana. Many of the domains and items were shared across both settings. CONCLUSION The study suggests that the multi-dimensional scales have high construct validity and reliability in both countries. Though there were differences in the two country contexts and in items and scales, there was convergence in the analysis that suggests that this measure may be relevant in different settings and should be validated in new settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION ACTRN12619000378123 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Boydell
- Global Health Institute, Geneva Graduate Institute, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Petrus S Steyn
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Joanna Paula Cordero
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ndema Habib
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - My Huong Nguyen
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Dela Nai
- Population Council, Accra, Ghana
| | - Donat Shamba
- Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Squires F, Martin Hilber A, Cordero JP, Boydell V, Portela A, Lewis Sabin M, Steyn P. Social accountability for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health: A review of reviews. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0238776. [PMID: 33035242 PMCID: PMC7546481 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Globally, increasing efforts have been made to hold duty-bearers to account for their commitments to improve reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (RMNCAH) over the past two decades, including via social accountability approaches: citizen-led, collective processes for holding duty-bearers to account. There have been many individual studies and several reviews of social accountability approaches but the implications of their findings to inform future accountability efforts are not clear. We addressed this gap by conducting a review of reviews in order to summarise the current evidence on social accountability for RMNCAH, identify factors contributing to intermediary outcomes and health impacts, and identify future research and implementation priorities. The review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO CRD42019134340). We searched eight databases and systematic review repositories and sought expert recommendations for published and unpublished reviews, with no date or language restrictions. Six reviews were analysed using narrative synthesis: four on accountability or social accountability approaches for RMNCAH, and two specifically examining perinatal mortality audits, from which we extracted information relating to community involvement in audits. Our findings confirmed that there is extensive and growing evidence for social accountability approaches, particularly community monitoring interventions. Few documented social accountability approaches to RMNCAH achieve transformational change by going beyond information-gathering and awareness-raising, and attention to marginalised and vulnerable groups, including adolescents, has not been well documented. Drawing generalisable conclusions about results was difficult, due to inconsistent nomenclature and gaps in reporting, particularly regarding objectives, contexts, and health impacts. Promising approaches for successful social accountability initiatives include careful tailoring to the social and political context, strategic planning, and multi-sectoral/multi-stakeholder approaches. Future primary research could advance the evidence by describing interventions and their results in detail and in their contexts, focusing on factors and processes affecting acceptability, adoption, and effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adriane Martin Hilber
- Novametrics, Duffield, Derbyshire, United Kingdom
- Swiss Centre for International Health, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Joanna Paula Cordero
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Victoria Boydell
- Global Health Centre, The Graduate Institute Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Anayda Portela
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Miriam Lewis Sabin
- The Partnership for Maternal, Newborn, Child & Adolescent Health, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Petrus Steyn
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Silumbwe A, Nkole T, Munakampe MN, Cordero JP, Milford C, Zulu JM, Steyn PS. Facilitating community participation in family planning and contraceptive services provision and uptake: community and health provider perspectives. Reprod Health 2020; 17:119. [PMID: 32771028 PMCID: PMC7414747 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-020-00968-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although community participation has been identified as being important for improved and sustained health outcomes, designing and successfully implementing it in large scale public health programmes, including family planning and contraceptive (FP/C) service provision, remains challenging. Zambian participants in a multi-country project (the UPTAKE project) took part in the development of an intervention involving community and healthcare provider participation in FP/C services provision and uptake. This study reports key thematic areas identified by the study participants as critical to facilitating community participation in this intervention. METHODS This was an exploratory qualitative research study, conducted in Kabwe District, Central Province, in 2017. Twelve focus group discussions were conducted with community members (n = 114), two with healthcare providers (n = 19), and ten in-depth interviews with key community and health sector stakeholders. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS Four thematic categories were identified by the participants as critical to facilitating community participation in FP/C services. Firstly, accountability in the recruitment of community participants and incorporation of community feedback in FP/C. programming. Secondly, engagement of existing community resources and structures in FP/C services provision. Thirdly, building trust in FP/C methods/services through credible community-based distributors and promotion of appropriate FP/C methods/services. Fourthly, promoting strategies that address structural failures, such as the feminisation of FP/C services and the lack FP/C services that are responsive to adolescent needs. CONCLUSIONS Understanding and considering community members' and healthcare providers' views regarding contextualized and locally relevant participatory approaches, facilitators and challenges to participation, could improve the design, implementation and success of participatory public health programmes, including FP/C.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Silumbwe
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, P.O Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Theresa Nkole
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Margarate N. Munakampe
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, P.O Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Joanna Paula Cordero
- UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP) and Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research (SRH), Geneva, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Cecilia Milford
- MRU (MatCH Research Unit), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa
| | - Joseph Mumba Zulu
- Department of Health Promotion, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Petrus S. Steyn
- UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP) and Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research (SRH), Geneva, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Munakampe MN, Nkole T, Silumbwe A, Zulu JM, Cordero JP, Steyn PS. Feasibility testing of a community dialogue approach for promoting the uptake of family planning and contraceptive services in Zambia. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:728. [PMID: 32771022 PMCID: PMC7414985 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05589-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community dialogues have been used in participatory approaches in various health prevention and awareness programs, including family planning interventions, to increase understanding and alignment of particular issues from different peoples' perspectives. The main objective of this paper is to document the feasibility of a community dialogue approach, which aimed to promote dialogue between healthcare providers and community members. The feasibility testing was part of formative-phase research needed to design an intervention, with the ultimate goal of increasing the uptake of family planning and contraception. The community dialogue intervention generated discussions on key approaches to improve family planning and contraception provision and uptake. METHODS Key stages of the community dialogue were undertaken, with representation from healthcare providers and community members. Participants included frontline and managerial health care providers, community health workers, family planning and contraception users, the youth, other stakeholders from the education sector, and civil society. How the dialogue was implemented (operational feasibility) as well as the cultural feasibility of the community dialogue content was evaluated through participant observations during the dialogue, using a standardised feasibility testing tick-list, and through focus group discussions with the stakeholders who participated in the community dialogue. RESULTS Overall, 21 of the 30 invited participants attended the meeting- 70% attendance. The approach facilitated discussions on how quality care could be achieved in family planning and contraception provision, guided by the ground rules that were agreed upon by the different stakeholders. A need for more time for the discussion was noted. Participants also noted the need for more balanced representation from adolescents as well as other family planning stakeholders, such as community members, especially in comparison to healthcare providers. Some participants were not comfortable with the language used. Young people felt older participants used complicated terminologies while community members felt the health care providers outnumbered them, in terms of representation. CONCLUSION Generally, the community dialogue was well received by the community members and the healthcare providers, as was observed from the sentiments expressed by both categories. Some key considerations for refining the approach included soliciting maximum participation from otherwise marginalized groups like the youth would provide stronger representation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margarate Nzala Munakampe
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Zambia, School of Public Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
- Strategic Centre for Health Systems Metrics & Evaluations (SCHEME), School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
| | - Theresa Nkole
- Levy Mwanawasa Medical University (LMMU), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Adam Silumbwe
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Zambia, School of Public Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Joseph Mumba Zulu
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Zambia, School of Public Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Joanna Paula Cordero
- UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Petrus S Steyn
- UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cordero JP, Steyn PS, Gichangi P, Kriel Y, Milford C, Munakampe M, Njau I, Nkole T, Silumbwe A, Smit J, Kiarie J. Community and Provider Perspectives on Addressing Unmet Need for Contraception: Key Findings from a Formative Phase Research in Kenya, South Africa and Zambia (2015-2016). Afr J Reprod Health 2019; 23:106-119. [PMID: 31782636 DOI: 10.29063/ajrh2019/v23i3.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Unmet need for contraception remains a challenge especially in low and middle-income countries. Community participation or the -active involvement of affected populations in all stages of decision-making and implementation of policies, programs, and services‖ is a precondition for attaining the highest standard of health. Participation as a key component of rights and quality of care frameworks could increase met needs. However, it has been inadequately addressed in contraceptive programs. A qualitative, exploratory methodology that included focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with community members, healthcare providers, and other stakeholders were conducted to identify domains or key thematic areas of action through which stakeholders could be engaged. The study conducted in Kenya, South Africa, and Zambia explored knowledge and use of contraceptives, barriers and enablers to access, quality of care, and participatory practices. Thematic analysis was used, facilitated by NVivo (version 10 QSR International) with a single master codebook. Comparing the thematic areas that emerged from the county data, four domains were selected: quality of care, informed decision-making, acceptability, and accountability. These domains informed the theory of change of a participatory programme aiming to meet unmet needs. Identifying possible generalizable domains establishes measurable and comparable intermediate outcomes for participatory programs despite diverse African contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Paula Cordero
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Petrus S Steyn
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Peter Gichangi
- International Centre for Reproductive Health - Kenya (ICRH-K), P.O.Box 91109 - 80103, Mombasa, Kenya.,Technical University of Mombasa, Tudor, Tom Mboya Street, P.O. Box 90420 - 80100, Mombasa Kenya
| | - Yolandie Kriel
- MatCH Research Unit (MRU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 40 Dr AB Xuma Street, 11th Floor, Suite 1137, Commercial City Building, Durban, 4000, South Africa
| | - Cecilia Milford
- MatCH Research Unit (MRU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 40 Dr AB Xuma Street, 11th Floor, Suite 1137, Commercial City Building, Durban, 4000, South Africa
| | - Margarate Munakampe
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Zambia Nationalist Road, P.O Box 50110, Lusaka.,Strategic Centre for Health Systems, Metrics and Evaluations (SCHEME), Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Zambia Nationalist Road, P.O Box 50110, Lusaka
| | - Irene Njau
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, CGMRC, PO Box 230-80108, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Theresa Nkole
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Levy Mwanawasa University Teaching Hospital, Lot 1222, Great East Road, Chainama Area, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Adam Silumbwe
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Zambia Nationalist Road, P.O Box 50110, Lusaka
| | - Jennifer Smit
- MatCH Research Unit (MRU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 40 Dr AB Xuma Street, 11th Floor, Suite 1137, Commercial City Building, Durban, 4000, South Africa
| | - James Kiarie
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ali M, Cordero JP, Khan F, Folz R. 'Leaving no one behind': a scoping review on the provision of sexual and reproductive health care to nomadic populations. BMC Womens Health 2019; 19:161. [PMID: 31842838 PMCID: PMC6916058 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-019-0849-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGRUND Marginalized groups, such as nomadic populations across the world, have perhaps the least access to modern reproductive health (RH) services. This scoping review aims to identify barriers to access to RH services faced by nomadic populations from the existing literature and to highlight possible opportunities to address them. METHODS Key databases, including PubMed, Popline, Google Scholar, and Google Advanced were searched for relevant articles published between 2002 and 2019. A total 344 articles were identified through database online searches, and 31 were included in the review. RESULTS Nomadic people face complex barriers to healthcare access that can be broadly categorized as external (geographic isolation, socio-cultural dynamics, logistical and political factors) and internal (lifestyle, norms and practices, perceptions) factors. To effectively address the needs of nomadic populations, RH services must be available, accessible and acceptable through tailored and culturally sensitive approaches. A combination of fixed and mobile services has proven effective among mobile populations. Low awareness of modern RH services and their benefits is a major barrier to utilization. Partnership with communities through leveraging existing structures, networks and decision-making patterns can ensure that the programmes are effectively implemented. CONCLUSION Further research is needed to better understand and address the RH needs of nomadic populations. Though existing evidence is limited, opportunities do exist and should be explored. Raising awareness and sensitization training among health providers about the specific needs of nomads is important. Improved education and access to information about the benefits of modern RH care among nomadic communities is needed. Ensuring community participation through involvement of nomadic women and girls, community leaders, male partners, and trained traditional birth attendants are key facilitators in reaching nomads. However, participatory programmes also need to be recognized and supported by governments and existing health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moazzam Ali
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Joanna Paula Cordero
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Faria Khan
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Rachel Folz
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Crankshaw TL, Kriel Y, Milford C, Cordero JP, Mosery N, Steyn PS, Smit J. "As we have gathered with a common problem, so we seek a solution": exploring the dynamics of a community dialogue process to encourage community participation in family planning/contraceptive programmes. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:710. [PMID: 31623612 PMCID: PMC6798361 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4490-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Community dialogues have been widely used as a method for community engagement and participation to cover a broad range of areas. However, there has been limited documentation and evaluation of the process, particularly as a method towards achieving family planning and contraception (FP/C) programme goals. As part of the development of an intervention package aimed at increasing community and health care provider (HCP) participation in the provision of FP/C, feasibility testing of the intervention approach (a community dialogue between communities and health facilities) was carried out. Our findings offer a systematic description and evaluation of the community dialogue process, with key recommendations towards future implementation. Methods The dialogue was evaluated in three ways: 1) through participant observation during the community dialogue, 2) via a standardised feasibility testing tick-list for all observers of the dialogue, and 3) through three focus group discussions (FGDs) consisting of different groups of stakeholders who participated in the community dialogue. In total, 28 community members, HCPs, and key stakeholders attended the community dialogue (22 females, 6 males). Twenty-seven of the community dialogue participants participated in one of 3 FGDs held after the dialogue. Six evaluators assessed feasibility of the dialogue process. Results There was good attendance, representation and participation amongst community and provider sectors based on the participant observations using the standardized feasibility check-list. The community dialogue process received positive feedback in the FGDs and was demonstrated to be feasible and acceptable. Key factors contributing to the success of the community dialogue included a skilled facilitator, good representation of participants, establishing ground rules, good timekeeping, and using a Theory of Change to facilitate goal identification and dialogue. Issues to consider are the underlying power differentials related to age, profession and gender which caused initial feelings of anxiety amongst some participants. Conclusions Our formative findings offer a systematic description and evaluation of a community dialogue process with key recommendations that may be considered when constituting similar community dialogues in the future. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4490-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamaryn L Crankshaw
- Health Economics and HIV and AIDS Research Division (HEARD), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
| | - Yolandie Kriel
- MatCH Research Unit (MRU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa
| | - Cecilia Milford
- MatCH Research Unit (MRU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa
| | - Joanna Paula Cordero
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nzwakie Mosery
- MatCH Research Unit (MRU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa
| | - Petrus S Steyn
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training Human Reproduction, Avenue Appia 20, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jennifer Smit
- MatCH Research Unit (MRU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Silumbwe A, Nkole T, Munakampe MN, Milford C, Cordero JP, Kriel Y, Zulu JM, Steyn PS. Community and health systems barriers and enablers to family planning and contraceptive services provision and use in Kabwe District, Zambia. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:390. [PMID: 29855292 PMCID: PMC5984360 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3136-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2017] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unmet need for contraception results in several health challenges such as unintended pregnancies, unwanted births and unsafe abortions. Most interventions have been unable to successfully address this unmet need due to various community and health system level factors. Identifying these inhibiting and enabling factors prior to implementation of interventions forms the basis for planning efforts to increase met needs. This qualitative study was part of the formative phase of a larger research project that aimed to develop an intervention to increase met needs for contraception through community and health system participation. The specific study component reported here explores barriers and enablers to family planning and contraceptive services provision and utilisation at community and health systems levels. METHODS Twelve focus group discussions were conducted with community members (n = 114) and two with healthcare providers (n = 19). Ten in-depth interviews were held with key stakeholders. The study was conducted in Kabwe district, Zambia. Interviews/discussions were translated and transcribed verbatim. Data were coded and organised using NVivo 10 (QSR international), and were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Health systems barriers include long distances to healthcare facilities, stock-outs of preferred methods, lack of policies facilitating contraceptive provision in schools, and undesirable provider attitudes. Community level barriers comprise women's experience with contraceptive side effects, myths, rumours and misconceptions, societal stigma, and negative traditional and religious beliefs. On the other hand, health systems enablers consist of political will from government to expand contraceptive services access, integration of contraceptive services, provision of couples counselling, and availability of personnel to offer basic methods mix. Functional community health system structures, community desire to delay pregnancy, and knowledge of contraceptive services are enablers at a community level. CONCLUSIONS These study findings highlight key community and health systems factors that should be considered by policy, program planners and implementers in the design and implementation of family planning and contraceptive services programmes, to ensure sustained uptake and increased met needs for contraceptive methods and services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Silumbwe
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, P.O Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Theresa Nkole
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Margarate Nzala Munakampe
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, P.O Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Cecilia Milford
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MatCH Research Unit (MRU), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa
| | - Joanna Paula Cordero
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Yolandie Kriel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MatCH Research Unit (MRU), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa
| | - Joseph Mumba Zulu
- Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, P.O Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Petrus S. Steyn
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Steyn PS, Cordero JP, Gichangi P, Smit JA, Nkole T, Kiarie J, Temmerman M. Participatory approaches involving community and healthcare providers in family planning/contraceptive information and service provision: a scoping review. Reprod Health 2016; 13:88. [PMID: 27449128 PMCID: PMC4957852 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-016-0198-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2015] [Accepted: 06/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
As efforts to address unmet need for family planning and contraception (FP/C) accelerate, voluntary use, informed choice and quality must remain at the fore. Active involvement of affected populations has been recognized as one of the key principles in ensuring human rights in the provision of FP/C and in improving quality of care. However, community participation continues to be inadequately addressed in large-scale FP/C programmes. Community and healthcare providers' unequal relationship can be a barrier to successful participation. This scoping review identifies participatory approaches involving both community and healthcare providers for FP/C services and analyzes relevant evidence. The detailed analysis of 25 articles provided information on 28 specific programmes and identified three types of approaches for community and healthcare provider participation in FP/C programmes. The three approaches were: (i) establishment of new groups either health committees to link the health service providers and users or implementation teams to conduct specific activities to improve or extend available health services, (ii) identification of and collaboration with existing community structures to optimise use of health services and (iii) operationalization of tools to facilitate community and healthcare provider collaboration for quality improvement. Integration of community and healthcare provider participation in FP/C provision were conducted through FP/C-only programmes, FP/C-focused programmes and/or as part of a health service package. The rationales behind the interventions varied and may be multiple. Examples include researcher-, NGO- or health service-initiated programmes with clear objectives of improving FP/C service provision or increasing demand for services; facilitating the involvement of community members or service users and, in some cases, may combine socio-economic development and increasing self-reliance or control over sexual and reproductive health. Although a number of studies reported increase in FP/C knowledge and uptake, the lack of robust monitoring and evaluation mechanisms and quantitative and comparable data resulted in difficulties in generating clear recommendations. It is imperative that programmes are systematically designed, evaluated and reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petrus S Steyn
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Joanna Paula Cordero
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Peter Gichangi
- International Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Nairobi and Ghent, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Jennifer A Smit
- Maternal, Adolescent and Child Health Research Unit, Durban, South Africa
| | | | - James Kiarie
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Marleen Temmerman
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|