Long-Term Survival of Patients With Cancer, Sepsis, and Vasopressor Requirements Based on Lactate Levels

A prospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the 1-year survival of cancer patients with sepsis and vasopressor requirements. Eligible patients were admitted a Comprehensive Cancer Center's ICU and were compared based on their admission lactate levels. Of the 132 included patients, 87 (66%) had high lactate (HL; > 2.0 mmol/L), and 45 (34%) had normal lactate (NL; ≤ 2.0 mmol/L). The 1-year survival rates of the two groups were similar (HL 16% vs. NL 18%; p = 0.0921). After adjustment for ICU baseline characteristics, HL was not significantly associated with a 1-year survival (Hazards ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.94-2.05). Critically ill cancer patients with sepsis and vasopressor requirements, regardless of the lactate level, had 1-year survival of less than 20%. Large multicenter cancer registries would enable to confirm our findings and better understand the long-term trajectories of sepsis in this vulnerable population.

Management of respiratory failure in immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced overlap syndrome: a case series and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Checkpoint inhibitor-induced overlap syndrome ([OS] myocarditis, and myositis with or without myasthenia gravis) is rare but life-threatening.

CASES PRESENTATION

Here we present a case series of four cancer patients that developed OS. High troponinemia raised the concern for myocarditis in all the cases. However, the predominant clinical feature differed among the cases. Two patients showed marked myocarditis with a shorter hospital stay. The other two patients had a prolonged ICU stay due to severe neuromuscular involvement secondary to myositis and myasthenia gravis. Treatment was based on steroids, plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and immunosuppressive biological agents.

CONCLUSION

The management of respiratory failure is challenging, particularly in those patients with predominant MG. Along with intensive clinical monitoring, bedside respiratory mechanics can guide the decision-making process of selecting a respiratory support method, the timing of elective intubation and extubation.

Sepsis-Related Outcomes of Patients with Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to study the sepsis-related outcomes in patients with Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). A total of 82,087 patients were included, most had essential thrombocytosis (83.7%), followed by polycythemia vera (13.7%), and primary myelofibrosis (2.6%). Sepsis was diagnosed in 15,789 (19.2%) patients and their mortality rate was higher than nonseptic patients (7.5% vs 1.8%; p < .001). Sepsis was the most significant risk factor of mortality (aOR, 3.84; 95% CI, 3.51-4.21), others included liver disease (aOR, 2.42; 95% CI, 2.11-2.78), pulmonary embolism (aOR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.83-2.80), cerebrovascular disease (aOR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.81-2.33), and myocardial infarction (aOR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.52-1.96).

Sepsis-related outcomes of patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms

We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to study the sepsis-related outcomes in patients with Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). A total of 82,087 patients were included, most had essential thrombocytosis (83.7%), followed by polycythemia vera (13.7%), and primary myelofibrosis (2.6%). Sepsis was diagnosed in 15,789 (19.2%) patients and their mortality rate was higher than non-septic patients (7.5% vs 1.8%; P<.001). Sepsis was the most significant risk factor of mortality (aOR, 3.84; 95% CI, 3.51-4.21), others included liver disease (aOR, 2.42; 95% CI, 2.11-2.78), pulmonary embolism (aOR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.83-2.80), cerebrovascular disease (aOR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.81-2.33), and myocardial infarction (aOR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.52-1.96).

Clinical Characteristics and Cause of Death Among Hospitalized Decedents With Cancer and COVID-19

There is scant information on the clinical progression, end-of-life decisions, and cause of death of patients with cancer diagnosed with COVID-19. Therefore, we conducted a case series of patients admitted to a comprehensive cancer center who did not survive their hospitalization. To determine the cause of death, 3 board-certified intensivists reviewed the electronic medical records. Concordance regarding cause of death was calculated. Discrepancies were resolved through a joint case-by-case review and discussion among the 3 reviewers. During the study period, 551 patients with cancer and COVID-19 were admitted to a dedicated specialty unit; among them, 61 (11.6%) were nonsurvivors. Among nonsurvivors, 31 (51%) patients had hematologic cancers, and 29 (48%) had undergone cancer-directed chemotherapy within 3 months before admission. The median time to death was 15 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.8 to 18.2). There were no differences in time to death by cancer category or cancer treatment intent. The majority of decedents (84%) had full code status at admission; however, 53 (87%) had do-not-resuscitate orders at the time of death. Most deaths were deemed to be COVID-19 related (88.5%). The concordance between the reviewers for the cause of death was 78.7%. In contrast to the belief that COVID-19 decedents die because of their comorbidities, in our study only 1 of every 10 patients died of cancer-related causes. Full-scale interventions were offered to all patients irrespective of oncologic treatment intent. However, most decedents in this population preferred care with nonresuscitative measures rather than full support at the end of life.

Humanizing the intensive care unit experience in a comprehensive cancer center: A patient- and family-centered improvement study

OBJECTIVES

Improving family-centered outcomes is a priority in oncologic critical care. As part of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Collaborative, we implemented patient- and family-centered initiatives in a comprehensive cancer center.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team was created to implement the initiatives. We instituted an open visitation policy (OVP) that revamped the use of the two-way communication boards and enhanced the waiting room experience by hosting ICU family-centered events. To assess the initiatives' effects, we carried out pre-intervention (PRE) and post-intervention (POST) family/caregiver and ICU practitioner surveys.

RESULTS

A total of 159 (PRE = 79, POST = 80) family members and 147 (PRE = 95, POST = 52) ICU practitioners participated. Regarding the decision-making process, family members felt more included (40.5% vs. 68.8%, p < 0.001) and more supported (29.1% vs. 48.8%, p = 0.011) after the implementation of the initiatives. The caregivers also felt more control over the decision-making process in the POST survey (34.2% vs. 56.3%, p = 0.005). Although 33% of the ICU staff considered OVP was beneficial for the ICU, 41% disagreed and 26% were neutral. Only half of them responded that OVP was beneficial for patients and 63% agreed that OVP was beneficial for families. Half of the practitioners agreed that OVP resulted in additional work for staff.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

Our project effectively promoted patient- and family-centered care. The families expressed satisfaction with the communication of information and the decision-making process. However, the ICU staff felt that the initiatives increased their work load. Further research is needed to understand whether making this project universal or introducing additional novel practices would significantly benefit patients admitted to the ICU and their family.

Outcomes and Predictors of 28-Day Mortality in Patients With Solid Tumors and Septic Shock Defined by Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock Criteria

BACKGROUND

Data assessing outcomes of patients with solid tumors demonstrating septic shock using the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock are scarce.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the independent predictors of 28-day mortality in critically ill adults with solid tumors and septic shock?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Cohort of solid tumor patients admitted to the ICU with septic shock. Demographic and clinical characteristics were gathered from the electronic health records. We developed a reduced multivariate logistics regression model to identify independent predictors of 28-day mortality and used Kaplan-Meier plots to assess survival.

RESULTS

A total of 271 patients were included. The median age was 62 years (range, 19-94 years); 57.2% were men and 53.5% were White. The most common underlying malignancies were lung (19.2%), breast (7.7%), pancreatic (7.7%), and colorectal (7.4%) cancers. Most patients (84.5%) harbored metastatic disease. Twenty-eight days after ICU admission, 188 patients (69.4%) had died. Nonsurvivors showed a higher rate of advanced cancer, longer hospital stays before ICU admission, and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores at admission and throughout the ICU stay (P < .001 for all). The multivariate analysis identified metastatic disease (OR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.43-7.03), respiratory failure (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.15-4.74), elevated lactate levels (OR, 3.19; 95% CI, 1.90-5.36), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance scores of 3 or 4 (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.33-5.57) as independent predictors of 28-day mortality. Only 38 patients (14%) were discharged home without medical assistance.

INTERPRETATION

The 28-day mortality rate of patients with solid tumors and septic shock was considerably high. Factors associated with worse survival included advanced oncologic disease, poor performance status, high lactate level, and concomitant acute respiratory failure. Early goals-of-care discussions should be considered for frail patients with septic shock and advanced metastatic disease without denying access to the appropriate level of care.

All-cause mortality in cancer patients treated for sepsis in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Sepsis is a common complication in patients with cancer, but studies evaluating the outcomes of critically ill cancer patients with sepsis on a global scale are limited. We aimed to summarize the existing evidence on mortality rates in this patient population.

Methods

Prospective and retrospective observational studies evaluating critically ill adult cancer patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, and/or septic shock were included. Studies published from January 2010 to September 2021 that reported at least one mortality outcome were retrieved from MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane databases. Study selection, bias assessment, and data collection were performed independently by two reviewers, and any discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. We calculated pooled intensive care unit (ICU), hospital, and 28/30-day mortality rates. The heterogeneity of the data was tested using the chi-square test, with a P value < 0.10 indicating significant heterogeneity.

Results

A total of 5464 citations were reviewed, of which 10 studies met the inclusion criteria; these studies included 6605 patients. All studies had a Newcastle–Ottawa scale score of 7 or higher. The mean patient age ranged from 51.4 to 64.9 years. The pooled ICU, hospital, and 28/30 day mortality rates were 48% (95% CI, 43– 53%; I² = 80.6%), 62% (95% CI, 58–67%; I² = 0%), and 50% (95% CI, 38– 62%; I² = 98%), respectively. Substantial between-study heterogeneity was observed.

Conclusion

Critically ill cancer patients with sepsis had poor survival, with a hospital mortality rate of about two-thirds. The substantial observed heterogeneity among studies could be attributed to variability in the criteria used to define sepsis as well as variability in treatment, the severity of illness, and care across settings. Our results are a call to action to identify strategies that improve outcomes for cancer patients with sepsis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-07392-w.

Outcomes and Predictors of 28-Day Mortality in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies and Septic Shock Defined by Sepsis-3 Criteria

BACKGROUND

To describe short-term outcomes and independent predictors of 28-dayx mortality in adult patients with hematologic malignancies and septic shock defined by the new Third International Consensus Definitions (Sepsis-3) criteria.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the medical ICU with septic shock from April 2016 to March 2019. Demographic and clinical features and short-term outcomes were collected. We used descriptive statistics to summarize patient characteristics, logistic regression to identify predictors of 28-day mortality, and Kaplan-Meier plots to assess survival.

RESULTS

Among the 459 hematologic patients with septic shock admitted to the ICU, 109 (23.7%) had received hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The median age was 63 years (range, 18-89 years), and 179 (39%) were women. Nonsurvivors had a higher Charlson comorbidity index (P=.007), longer length of stay before ICU admission (P=.01), and greater illness severity at diagnosis and throughout the hospital course (P<.001). The mortality rate at 28 days was 67.8% and increased with increasing sequential organ failure assessment score on admission (odds ratio [OR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.20), respiratory failure (OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.49-6.51), and maximum lactate level (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.22). Aminoglycosides administration (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.26-0.69), serum albumin (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31-0.86), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.24-0.65) were associated with lower 28-day mortality. Life support limitations were present in 81.6% of patients at death. At 90 days, 19.4% of the patients were alive.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite efforts to enhance survival, septic shock in patients with hematologic malignancies is still associated with high mortality rates and poor 90-day survival. These results demonstrate the need for an urgent call to action with higher awareness, including the further evaluation of interventions such as earlier ICU admission, aminoglycosides administration, and G-CSF treatment.

Outcomes and predictors of hospital mortality of patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms and sepsis: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database analysis

e19038

Background: Sepsis is associated with increased mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies, especially in those receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. The development of new therapies also increases the risk of infections in Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). However, the clinical implications and costs of sepsis in patients with polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocytosis (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) have not been reported at a national level. Therefore, we aimed to determine the outcomes, hospitalization costs, and predictors of mortality in patients with MPN and sepsis. Methods: We retrieved adult patients with MPN from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2016-2018. We used the ICD-10 codes to identify and compare patients with and without sepsis. The main outcomes were hospital mortality and predictors of mortality. We computed the chi-squared test and the Mann-Whitney U-test. Mortality predictors are estimated using multivariate logistic regression and logistic fixed-effect methods to control for admission cohort and hospital time invariant characteristics. All analyses were performed using Stata Statistical Software version 14 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). Results: A total of 86,723 patients with MPN were identified. The majority of them were white (66.9%), female (54.3%), with a median age of 62 (IQR 47-76). The most common MPN was ET (84.3%), followed by PV (14.2%). Sepsis was diagnosed in 16,146 (18.6%) of the MPN patients. There was a significantly higher mortality in the sepsis group vs. the non-sepsis group (7.4% vs. 1.8%; p < 0.001), longer LOS (8 vs. 4 days; p < 0.001), and higher median hospitalization cost (US$74,128 vs. US$39,987; p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, sepsis was associated with higher mortality (OR: 4.74; CI 95%: 4.33-5.18; p < 0.001). Among the MPN, those with PMF and sepsis had a higher risk of death (OR: 2.21; CI 95%: 1.72-2.82; p < 0.001). Other significant variables associated with mortality were age > 65 (OR: 2.51; CI 95%: 2.14-2.95; p < 0.001), concomitant chronic heart failure (CHF) (OR: 1.57; CI 95%: 1.39-1.77; p < 0.001), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (OR: 1.22; CI 95%: 1.10-1.35; p < 0.001), and weight loss (OR: 2.12; CI 95%: 1.79-2.51; p < 0.001). There was no significant association with sex and race/ethinicity. Conclusions: On patients with MPN, sepsis was associated with higher mortality, hospitalization costs, and LOS. Additionally, those with increased age, CHF, CKD, weight loss, and PMF were also at increased risk of death. There should be more emphasis on assessing the risk of sepsis on MPN to prevent worse outcomes and higher costs. Further studies should focus on identifying the specific causes of sepsis in MPN and promoting early recognition.

Clinical and financial implications of central venous catheters bloodstream infections in patients with multiple myeloma in the United States

e20033

Background: Multiple Myeloma(MM) has an increased exposure to intravascular catheters due to the increased risk of severe infections and due to the route of treatment administration. Central Venous Catheter Bloodstream Infections(CVCBI) have significant mortality, imply a delay in treatment and increased cost as well. There is no prior report on the risk factors for poor outcome in MM patients that develop this complication. We aim to describe the predictors of mortality as well as the changes in cost that CVCBI implies. Methods: We retrieved adult patients with MM from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2016-2018. We used the ICD-10 codes to identify and compare patients who developed CVCBI with those that did not developed it. The main outcomes were hospital mortality and predictors of mortality. We computed the chi-squared test and the Mann-Whitney U-test. Mortality predictors are estimated using multivariate logistic regression and logistic fixed-effect methods to control for admission cohort and hospital time invariant characteristics. All analyses were performed using Stata Statistical Software version 14 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). Results: A total of 58,838 patients with MM were identified. The majority were white (63.5%), male (55.3%), with a median age of 70 (IQR 62-78). Most MM were not in remission (99.1%), followed by those in remission (1.3%) and relapse (0.3%). CVCBI was diagnosed in 264 (0.4%) of the MM patients. There was significantly higher mortality in the CVCBI group vs. the non-CVCBI group (8.7% vs. 5%; p < 0.01), longer LOS (10 vs. 5 days; p < 0.001), and higher median hospitalization cost (US$86,168 vs. US$43,511; p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, CVCBI was associated with higher mortality (OR: 1.69; CI 95%: 1.14-2.52; p < 0.001). Among patients with MM and CVCBI those that had achieved remission had a higher risk of death (OR: 2.87; CI 95%: 2.17-3.8; p < 0.001). Other variables associated with mortality were age > 65 (OR: 1.84; CI 95%: 1.59-2.15; p < 0.001), concomitant chronic heart failure (CHF) (OR: 1.46; CI 95%: 1.29-1.65; p < 0.001), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (OR: 1.43; CI 95%: 1.32-1.56; p < 0.001), and weight loss (OR: 2.31; CI 95%: 1.91-2.8; p < 0.001). When compared to medicare patients with higher mortality were more likely to be under medicaid(OR: 1.25; CI 95%: 1.02-1.55; p < 0.05) and private insurances(OR: 1.31; CI 95%: 1.15-1.49; p < 0.001). There was no significant association with sex, race/ethinicity or household income. Conclusions: In patients with Multiple Myeloma the development of Central Venous Catheter Bloodstream Infections was associated with a higher overall mortality, length of stay and cost of hospitalization. Age, CHF, CKD and weight loss were independent risk factors for poor outcome in this patient population. Further studies are required on developing strategies for the prevention of this complication.

Pain management during the withholding and withdrawal of life support in critically ill patients at the end-of-life: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

To review and summarize the most frequent medications and dosages used during withholding and withdrawal of life-prolonging measures in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Virtual Health Library from inception through March 2019. We considered any study evaluating pharmaceutical interventions for pain management during the withholding or withdrawing of life support in adult critically ill patients at the end-of-life. Two independent investigators performed the screening and data extraction. We pooled data on utilization rate of analgesic and sedative drugs and summarized the dosing between the moment prior to withholding or withdrawal of life support and the moment before death.

Results

Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were conducted in the United States (38%), Canada (31%), and the Netherlands (31%). Eleven studies were single-cohort and twelve had a Newcastle–Ottawa Scale score of less than 7. The mean age of the patients ranged from 59 to 71 years, 59–100% were mechanically ventilated, and 47–100% of the patients underwent life support withdrawal. The most commonly used opioid and sedative were morphine [utilization rate 60% (95% CI 48–71%)] and midazolam [utilization rate 28% (95% CI 23–32%)], respectively. Doses increased during the end-of-life process (pooled mean increase in the dose of morphine: 2.6 mg/h, 95% CI 1.2–4).

Conclusions

Pain control is centered on opioids and adjunctive benzodiazepines, with dosages exceeding those recommended by guidelines. Despite consistency among guidelines, there is significant heterogeneity among practices in end-of-life care.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00134-020-06139-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Hemorrhagic Shock Secondary to Aortoesophageal Fistula as a Complication of Esophageal Cancer

Although aortoesophageal fistulas are rare, they can present as life-threatening emergencies. This condition can develop secondary to an aneurysm, foreign bodies, infiltrating tumors, and radiotherapy. We report a patient with hemorrhagic shock secondary to an aortoesophageal fistula. A 69-year-old male with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus treated with chemoradiation and metallic stent placement was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after an episode of hematemesis. The patient was hemodynamically unstable, requiring fluid resuscitation, blood transfusions, and respiratory and vasopressor support. The patient developed electric pulseless activity, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed for 40 minutes. An upper endoscopy showed the esophageal tumor infiltrating into the stent, and computed tomography (CT) angiogram showed leakage of contrast from the thoracic aorta to the esophagus. The diagnosis of aortoesophageal fistula was made. The patient underwent endovascular management for the fistula. However, his critical condition did not improve, and the patient perished.

Febuxostat and Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Febuxostat is approved in the United States for the management of hyperuricemia in patients with gout. In November 2017 the FDA released a warning alert on a possible link between febuxostat and cardiovascular disease (CVD) reported in a single clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis and assess the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients receiving febuxostat compared to a control group.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE database for studies published up until March 2018. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared febuxostat to control groups including placebo and allopurinol. We calculated the pooled relative risk (RR) of MACE and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Our search yielded 374 potentially relevant studies. Among the 25 RCTs included in the systematic review, 10 qualified for the meta-analysis. Among the 14,402 subjects included, the median age was 54 years (IQR 52-67) and 90% were male (IQR 82-96); 8602 received febuxostat, 5118 allopurinol, and 643 placebo. The pooled RR of MACE for febuxostat was 0.9; 95% CI 0.6-1.5 (p= 0.96) compared to the control. The RR of CV-related death for febuxostat was 1.29; 95% CI 1.01-1.66 (p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with other SU-lowering treatments, febuxostat does not increase or decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease but may increase the risk of CVD death. More RCTs measuring cardiovascular safety as a primary outcome are needed to adequately evaluate the risk of CVD with febuxostat.