1
|
Spears BM, Harpham Q, Brown E, Barnett CL, Barwell L, Collell MR, Davison M, Dixon H, Elliott JA, Garbutt A, Hazlewood C, Hofmann B, Lanyon J, Lofts S, MacKechnie C, Medinets S, Noble J, Ramsbottom D, Redhead JW, Riera A, Spurgeon DJ, Svendsen C, Taylor P, Thackeray SJ, Turvey K, Wood MD. A rapid environmental risk assessment of the Kakhovka Dam breach during the Ukraine conflict. Nat Ecol Evol 2024; 8:834-836. [PMID: 38499872 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02373-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Catherine L Barnett
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, UK
| | | | | | | | - Harry Dixon
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK
| | - J Alex Elliott
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, UK
| | - Angus Garbutt
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Environment Centre Wales, Bangor, UK
| | | | | | | | - Stephen Lofts
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, UK
| | | | - Sergiy Medinets
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Penicuik, UK
- Odesa National I.I. Mechnikov University, Odesa, Ukraine
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Claus Svendsen
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, UK
| | | | - Stephen J Thackeray
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bullock JM, Jarvis SG, Fincham WNW, Risser H, Schultz C, Spurgeon DJ, Redhead JW, Storkey J, Pywell RF. Mapping the ratio of agricultural inputs to yields reveals areas with potentially less sustainable farming. Sci Total Environ 2024; 909:168491. [PMID: 37952662 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
Fertilisers and pesticides are major sources of the environmental harm that results from farming, yet it remains difficult to target reductions in their impacts without compromising food production. We suggest that calculating the ratio of agrochemical inputs to yield can provide an indication of the potential sustainability of farmland, with those areas that have high input relative to yield being considered as less sustainable. Here we design an approach to characterise such Input to Yield Ratios (IYR) for four inputs that can be plausibly linked to environmental impacts: the cumulative risk resulting from pesticide exposure for honeybees and for earthworms, and the amount of nitrogen or phosphorus fertiliser applied per unit area. We capitalise on novel national-scale data to assess IYR for wheat farming across all of England. High-resolution spatial patterns of IYR differed among the four inputs, but hotspots, where all four IYRs were high, were in key agricultural regions not usually characterised as having low suitability for cropping. By scaling the magnitude of each input against crop yield, the IYR does not penalise areas of high yield with higher inputs (important for food production), or areas with low yields but which are achieved with low inputs (important as low impact areas). Instead, the IYR provides a globally applicable framework for evaluating the broad patterns of trade-offs between production and environmental risk, as an indicator of the potential for harm, over large scales. Its use can thus inform targeting to improve agricultural sustainability, or where one might switch to other land uses such as ecosystem restoration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan G Jarvis
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Bailrigg, Lancaster, UK
| | | | - Hannah Risser
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Bailrigg, Lancaster, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Upcott EV, Henrys PA, Redhead JW, Jarvis SG, Pywell RF. A new approach to characterising and predicting crop rotations using national-scale annual crop maps. Sci Total Environ 2023; 860:160471. [PMID: 36435258 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Cropping decisions affect the nature, timing and intensity of agricultural management strategies. Specific crop rotations are associated with different environmental impacts, which can be beneficial or detrimental. The ability to map, characterise and accurately predict rotations enables targeting of mitigation measures where most needed and forecasting of potential environmental risks. Using six years of the national UKCEH Land Cover® plus: Crops maps (2015-2020), we extracted crop sequences for every agricultural field parcel in Great Britain (GB). Our aims were to first characterise spatial patterns in rotation properties over a national scale based on their length, type and structural diversity values, second, to test an approach to predicting the next crop in a rotation, using transition probability matrices, and third, to test these predictions at a range of spatial scales. Strict cyclical rotations only occupy 16 % of all agricultural land, whereas long-term grassland and complex-rotational agriculture each occupy over 40 %. Our rotation classifications display a variety of distinctive spatial patterns among rotation lengths, types and diversity values. Rotations are mostly 5 years in length, short mixed crops are the most abundant rotation type, and high structural diversity is concentrated in east Scotland. Predictions were most accurate when using the most local spatial approach (spatial scaling), 5-year rotations, and including long-term grassland. The prediction framework we built demonstrates that our crop predictions have an accuracy of 36-89 %, equivalent to classification accuracy of national crop and land cover mapping using earth observation, and we suggest this could be improved with additional contextual data. Our results emphasise that rotation complexity is multi-faceted, yet it can be mapped in different ways and forms the basis for further exploration in and beyond agronomy, ecology, and other disciplines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily V Upcott
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK.
| | - Peter A Henrys
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4AP, UK
| | - John W Redhead
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK
| | - Susan G Jarvis
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4AP, UK
| | - Richard F Pywell
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Garratt MPD, O'Connor RS, Carvell C, Fountain MT, Breeze TD, Pywell R, Redhead JW, Kinneen L, Mitschunas N, Truslove L, Xavier e Silva C, Jenner N, Ashdown C, Brittain C, McKerchar M, Butcher C, Edwards M, Nowakowski M, Sutton P, Potts SG. Addressing pollination deficits in orchard crops through habitat management for wild pollinators. Ecol Appl 2023; 33:e2743. [PMID: 36107148 PMCID: PMC10078601 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
There is increasing evidence that farmers in many areas are achieving below maximum yields due to insufficient pollination. Practical and effective approaches are needed to maintain wild pollinator populations within agroecosystems so they can deliver critical pollination services that underpin crop production. We established nesting and wildflower habitat interventions in 24 UK apple orchards and measured effects on flower-visiting insects and the pollination they provide, exploring how this was affected by landscape context. We quantified the extent of pollination deficits and assessed whether the management of wild pollinators can reduce deficits and deliver improved outcomes for growers over 3 years. Wildflower interventions increased solitary bee numbers visiting apple flowers by over 20%, but there was no effect of nesting interventions. Other pollinator groups were influenced by both local and landscape-scale factors, with bumblebees and hoverflies responding to the relative proportion of semi-natural habitat at larger spatial scales (1000 m), while honeybees and other flies responded at 500 m or less. By improving fruit number and quality, pollinators contributed more than £16 k per hectare. However, deficits (where maximum potential was not being reached due to a lack of pollination) were recorded and the extent of these varied across orchards, and from year to year, with a 22% deficit in output in the worst (equivalent to ~£14 k/ha) compared to less than 3% (equivalent to ~£2 k/ha) in the best year. Although no direct effect of our habitat interventions on deficits in gross output was observed, initial fruit set and seed set deficits were reduced by abundant bumblebees, and orchards with a greater abundance of solitary bees saw lower deficits in fruit size. The abundance of pollinators in apple orchards is influenced by different local and landscape factors that interact and vary between years. Consequently, pollination, and the extent of economic output deficits, also vary between orchards and years. We highlight how approaches, including establishing wildflower areas and optimizing the ratio of cropped and non-cropped habitats can increase the abundance of key apple pollinators and improve outcomes for growers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rory S. O'Connor
- Centre for Agri‐Environmental Research, University of ReadingReadingUK
| | | | | | - Tom D. Breeze
- Centre for Agri‐Environmental Research, University of ReadingReadingUK
| | | | | | - Lois Kinneen
- Centre for Agri‐Environmental Research, University of ReadingReadingUK
| | | | - Louise Truslove
- Centre for Agri‐Environmental Research, University of ReadingReadingUK
| | | | | | | | - Claire Brittain
- Syngenta, Jealotts Hill International Research CentreBracknellUK
| | | | | | - Mike Edwards
- Edwards Ecological and Data Services LtdMidhurstUK
| | | | - Peter Sutton
- Syngenta, Jealotts Hill International Research CentreBracknellUK
| | - Simon G. Potts
- Centre for Agri‐Environmental Research, University of ReadingReadingUK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fincham WNW, Redhead JW, Woodcock BA, Pywell RF. Exploring drivers of within‐field crop yield variation using a national precision yield network. J Appl Ecol 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - John W. Redhead
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (UKCEH), Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, OX10 8BB UK
| | - Ben A. Woodcock
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (UKCEH), Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, OX10 8BB UK
| | - Richard F. Pywell
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (UKCEH), Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, OX10 8BB UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Redhead JW, Hinsley SA, Botham MS, Broughton RK, Freeman SN, Bellamy PE, Siriwardena G, Randle Z, Nowakowski M, Heard MS, Pywell RF. The effects of a decade of agri‐environment intervention in a lowland farm landscape on population trends of birds and butterflies. J Appl Ecol 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John W. Redhead
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford Oxfordshire UK
- School of Biological Sciences University of Reading Berkshire UK
| | - Shelley A. Hinsley
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford Oxfordshire UK
| | - Marc S. Botham
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford Oxfordshire UK
| | - Richard K. Broughton
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford Oxfordshire UK
| | - Stephen N. Freeman
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford Oxfordshire UK
| | | | | | - Zoë Randle
- Butterfly Conservation, Manor Yard Dorset UK
| | | | - Matthew S. Heard
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford Oxfordshire UK
- National Trust, Heelis Swindon UK
| | - Richard F. Pywell
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford Oxfordshire UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Carvell C, Mitschunas N, McDonald R, Hulmes S, Hulmes L, O'Connor RS, Garratt MP, Potts SG, Fountain MT, Sadykova D, Edwards M, Nowakowski M, Pywell RF, Redhead JW. Establishment and management of wildflower areas for insect pollinators in commercial orchards. Basic Appl Ecol 2022; 58:2-14. [PMID: 35115899 PMCID: PMC8752464 DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2021.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Sown wildflower areas are increasingly recommended as an agri-environmental intervention measure, but evidence for their success is limited to particular insect groups or hampered by the challenges of establishing seed mixes and maintaining flower abundance over time. We conducted a replicated experiment to establish wildflower areas to support insect pollinators in apple orchards. Over three years, and across 23 commercial UK orchards with and without sown wildflowers, we conducted 828 transect surveys across various non-crop habitats. We found that the abundance of flower-visiting solitary bees, bumblebees, honeybees, and beetles was increased in sown wildflower areas, compared with existing non-crop habitats in control orchards, from the second year following floral establishment. Abundance of hoverflies and other non-syrphid flies was increased in wildflower areas from the first year. Beyond the effect of wildflower areas, solitary bee abundance was also positively related to levels of floral cover in other local habitats within orchards, but neither local nor wider landscape-scale context affected abundance of other studied insect taxa within study orchards. There was a change in plant community composition on the sown wildflower areas between years, and in patterns of flowering within and between years, showing a succession from unsown weedy species towards a dominance of sown species over time. We discuss how the successful establishment of sown wildflower areas and delivery of benefits for different insect taxa relies on appropriate and reactive management practices as a key component of any such agri-environment scheme.
Collapse
|
8
|
Staley JT, Redhead JW, O'Connor RS, Jarvis SG, Siriwardena GM, Henderson IG, Botham MS, Carvell C, Smart SM, Phillips S, Jones N, McCracken ME, Christelow J, Howell K, Pywell RF. Designing a survey to monitor multi-scale impacts of agri-environment schemes on mobile taxa. J Environ Manage 2021; 290:112589. [PMID: 33906116 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Agri-environment schemes (AES) are key mechanisms to deliver conservation policy, and include management to provide resources for target taxa. Mobile species may move to areas where resources are increased, without this necessarily having an effect across the wider countryside or on populations over time. Most assessments of AES efficacy have been at small spatial scales, over short timescales, and shown varying results. We developed a survey design based on orthogonal gradients of AES management at local and landscape scales, which will enable the response of several taxa to be monitored. An evidence review of management effects on butterflies, birds and pollinating insects provided data to score AES options. Predicted gradients were calculated using AES uptake, weighted by the evidence scores. Predicted AES gradients for each taxon correlated strongly, and with the average gradient across taxa, supporting the co-location of surveys across different taxa. Nine 1 × 1 km survey squares were selected in each of four regional blocks with broadly homogenous background habitat characteristics. Squares in each block covered orthogonal contrasts across the range of AES gradients at local and landscape scales. This allows the effects of AES on species at each scale, and the interaction between scales, to be tested. AES options and broad habitats were mapped in field surveys, to verify predicted gradients which were based on AES option uptake data. The verified AES gradient had a strong positive relationship with the predicted gradient. AES gradients were broadly independent of background habitat within each block, likely allowing AES effects to be distinguished from potential effects of other habitat variables. Surveys of several mobile taxa are ongoing. This design will allow mobile taxa responses to AES to be tested in the surrounding countryside, as well as on land under AES management, and potentially in terms of population change over time. The design developed here provides a novel, pseudo-experimental approach for assessing the response of mobile species to gradients of management at two spatial scales. A similar design process could be applied in other regions that require a standardized approach to monitoring the impacts of management interventions on target taxa at landscape scales, if equivalent spatial data are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J T Staley
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (UKCEH), Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK.
| | - J W Redhead
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (UKCEH), Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK
| | - R S O'Connor
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (UKCEH), Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK
| | - S G Jarvis
- UKCEH, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP, UK
| | - G M Siriwardena
- British Trust for Ornithology (BTO), The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk, IP24 2PU, UK
| | - I G Henderson
- British Trust for Ornithology (BTO), The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk, IP24 2PU, UK
| | - M S Botham
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (UKCEH), Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK
| | - C Carvell
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (UKCEH), Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK
| | - S M Smart
- UKCEH, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP, UK
| | - S Phillips
- Natural England, Foss House, Kings Pool, 1-2 Peasholme Green, York, YO1 7PX, UK
| | - N Jones
- FERA Science Ltd, National Agri-food Innovation Campus, Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ, UK
| | - M E McCracken
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (UKCEH), Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK
| | - J Christelow
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (UKCEH), Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK
| | - K Howell
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (UKCEH), Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK
| | - R F Pywell
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (UKCEH), Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wagner M, Hulmes L, Hulmes S, Nowakowski M, Redhead JW, Pywell RF. Green hay application and diverse seeding approaches to restore grazed lowland meadows: progress after 4 years and effects of a flood risk gradient. Restor Ecol 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/rec.13180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Wagner
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Benson Lane, Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 8BB U.K
| | - Lucy Hulmes
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Benson Lane, Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 8BB U.K
| | - Sarah Hulmes
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Benson Lane, Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 8BB U.K
| | - Marek Nowakowski
- Wildlife Farming Company Alchester Road, Bicester Oxfordshire OX26 1UN U.K
| | - John W. Redhead
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Benson Lane, Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 8BB U.K
| | - Richard F. Pywell
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Benson Lane, Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 8BB U.K
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wagner M, Hulmes S, Hulmes L, Redhead JW, Nowakowski M, Pywell RF. Green hay transfer for grassland restoration: species capture and establishment. Restor Ecol 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/rec.13259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Wagner
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Benson Lane, Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 8BB U.K
| | - Sarah Hulmes
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Benson Lane, Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 8BB U.K
| | - Lucy Hulmes
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Benson Lane, Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 8BB U.K
| | - John W. Redhead
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Benson Lane, Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 8BB U.K
| | - Marek Nowakowski
- Wildlife Farming Company, Alchester Road, Bicester Oxfordshire OX26 1UN U.K
| | - Richard F. Pywell
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Benson Lane, Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 8BB U.K
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Finch T, Day BH, Massimino D, Redhead JW, Field RH, Balmford A, Green RE, Peach WJ. Evaluating spatially explicit sharing‐sparing scenarios for multiple environmental outcomes. J Appl Ecol 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Finch
- RSPB Centre for Conservation ScienceRSPBThe Lodge Sandy UK
- Conservation Science Group Department of Zoology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
| | - Brett H. Day
- Department of Economics LEEP InstituteUniversity of Exeter Exeter UK
| | | | | | - Rob H. Field
- RSPB Centre for Conservation ScienceRSPBThe Lodge Sandy UK
| | - Andrew Balmford
- Conservation Science Group Department of Zoology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
| | - Rhys E. Green
- Conservation Science Group Department of Zoology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Wallingford UK
| | - Will J. Peach
- RSPB Centre for Conservation ScienceRSPBThe Lodge Sandy UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Affiliation(s)
- John W. Redhead
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Wallingford UK
- School of Biological Sciences University of Reading Reading UK
| | - Tom H. Oliver
- School of Biological Sciences University of Reading Reading UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Redhead JW, Powney GD, Woodcock BA, Pywell RF. Effects of future agricultural change scenarios on beneficial insects. J Environ Manage 2020; 265:110550. [PMID: 32292173 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Revised: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Insects provide vital ecosystem services to agricultural systems in the form of pollination and natural pest control. However, there are currently widespread declines in the beneficial insects which deliver these services (i.e. pollinators and 'natural enemies' such as predators and parasitoids). Two key drivers of these declines have been the expansion of agricultural land and intensification of agricultural production. With an increasing human population requiring additional sources of food, further changes in agricultural land use appear inevitable. Identifying likely trajectories of change and predicting their impacts on beneficial insects provides a scientific basis for making informed decisions on the policies and practices of sustainable agriculture. We created spatially explicit, exploratory scenarios of potential changes in the extent and intensity of agricultural land use across Great Britain (GB). Scenarios covered 52 possible combinations of change in agricultural land cover (i.e. agricultural expansion or grassland restoration) and intensity (i.e. crop type and diversity). We then used these scenarios to predict impacts on beneficial insect species richness and several metrics of functional diversity at a 10km (hectad) resolution. Predictions were based on species distribution models derived from biological records, comprising data on 116 bee species (pollinators) and 81 predatory beetle species (natural enemies). We identified a wide range of possible consequences for beneficial insect species richness and functional diversity as result of future changes in agricultural extent and intensity. Current policies aimed at restoring semi-natural grassland should result in increases in the richness and functional diversity of both pollinators and natural enemies, even if agricultural practices remain intensive on cropped land (i.e. land-sparing). In contrast, any expansion of arable land is likely to be accompanied by widespread declines in richness of beneficial insects, even if cropping practices become less intensive (i.e. land-sharing), although effects of functional diversity are more mixed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John W Redhead
- Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Natural Environment Research Council, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK; School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Harborne Building, Reading, Berkshire, RG6 6AS, UK.
| | - Gary D Powney
- Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Natural Environment Research Council, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK
| | - Ben A Woodcock
- Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Natural Environment Research Council, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK
| | - Richard F Pywell
- Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Natural Environment Research Council, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Redhead JW, Woodcock BA, Pocock MJ, Pywell RF, Vanbergen AJ, Oliver TH. Potential landscape-scale pollinator networks across Great Britain: structure, stability and influence of agricultural land cover. Ecol Lett 2018; 21:1821-1832. [DOI: 10.1111/ele.13157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Revised: 05/12/2018] [Accepted: 08/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- John W. Redhead
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Maclean Building Wallingford Oxfordshire OX108BB UK
- School of Biological Sciences; University of Reading; Harborne Building Reading Berkshire RG6 6AS UK
| | - Ben A. Woodcock
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Maclean Building Wallingford Oxfordshire OX108BB UK
| | - Michael J.O. Pocock
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Maclean Building Wallingford Oxfordshire OX108BB UK
| | - Richard F. Pywell
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Maclean Building Wallingford Oxfordshire OX108BB UK
| | - Adam J. Vanbergen
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Bush Estate Penicuik Midlothian EH26 0QB UK
- Agroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA; Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté; F-21000 Dijon France
| | - Tom H. Oliver
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Maclean Building Wallingford Oxfordshire OX108BB UK
- School of Biological Sciences; University of Reading; Harborne Building Reading Berkshire RG6 6AS UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ridding LE, Redhead JW, Oliver TH, Schmucki R, McGinlay J, Graves AR, Morris J, Bradbury RB, King H, Bullock JM. The importance of landscape characteristics for the delivery of cultural ecosystem services. J Environ Manage 2018; 206:1145-1154. [PMID: 30029348 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Revised: 11/21/2017] [Accepted: 11/25/2017] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
The importance of Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) to human wellbeing is widely recognised. However, quantifying these non-material benefits is challenging and consequently they are often not assessed. Mapping approaches are increasingly being used to understand the spatial distribution of different CES and how this relates to landscape characteristics. This study uses an online Public Participation Geographic Information System (PPGIS) to elicit information on outdoor locations important to respondents in Wiltshire, a dynamic lowland landscape in southern England. We analysed these locations in a GIS with spatial datasets representing potential influential factors, including protected areas, land use, landform, and accessibility. We assess these characteristics at different spatial and visual scales for different types of cultural engagement. We find that areas that are accessible, near to urban centres, with larger views, and a high diversity of protected habitats, are important for the delivery of CES. Other characteristics including a larger area of woodland and the presence of sites of historic interest in the surrounding landscape were also influential. These findings have implications for land-use planning and the management of ecosystems, by demonstrating the benefits of high quality ecological sites near to towns. The importance of maintaining and restoring landscape features, such as woodlands, to enhance the delivery of CES were also highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy E Ridding
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK.
| | - John W Redhead
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK.
| | - Tom H Oliver
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK; School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 217, Reading, Berkshire RG6 6AH, UK.
| | - Reto Schmucki
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK.
| | - James McGinlay
- School of Energy, Environment and Agri-Food, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, MK43 0AL, UK.
| | - Anil R Graves
- School of Energy, Environment and Agri-Food, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, MK43 0AL, UK.
| | - Joe Morris
- School of Energy, Environment and Agri-Food, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, MK43 0AL, UK.
| | - Richard B Bradbury
- RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire, SG19 2DL, UK; Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK.
| | - Helen King
- School of Energy, Environment and Agri-Food, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, MK43 0AL, UK; Faculty of Business and Law, Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AL, UK.
| | - James M Bullock
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Redhead JW, May L, Oliver TH, Hamel P, Sharp R, Bullock JM. National scale evaluation of the InVEST nutrient retention model in the United Kingdom. Sci Total Environ 2018; 610-611:666-677. [PMID: 28826113 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2017] [Revised: 08/09/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
A wide variety of tools aim to support decision making by modelling, mapping and quantifying ecosystem services. If decisions are to be properly informed, the accuracy and potential limitations of these tools must be well understood. However, dedicated studies evaluating ecosystem service models against empirical data are rare, especially over large areas. In this paper, we report on the national-scale assessment of a new ecosystem service model for nutrient delivery and retention, the InVEST Nutrient Delivery Ratio model. For 36 river catchments across the UK, we modelled total catchment export of phosphorus (P) and/or nitrogen (N) and compared model outputs to measurements derived from empirical water chemistry data. The model performed well in terms of relative magnitude of nutrient export among catchments (best Spearman's rank correlation for N and P, respectively: 0.81 and 0.88). However, there was wide variation among catchments in the accuracy of the model, and absolute values of nutrient exports frequently showed high percentage differences between modelled and empirically-derived exports (best median absolute percentage difference for N and P, respectively: ±64%, ±44%). The model also showed a high degree of sensitivity to nutrient loads and hydrologic routing input parameters and these sensitivities varied among catchments. These results suggest that the InVEST model can provide valuable information on nutrient fluxes to decision makers, especially in terms of relative differences among catchments. However, caution is needed if using the absolute modelled values for decision-making. Our study also suggests particular attention should be paid to researching input nutrient loadings and retentions, and the selection of appropriate input data resolutions and threshold flow accumulation values. Our results also highlight how availability of empirical data can improve model calibration and performance assessment and reinforce the need to include such data in ecosystem service modelling studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John W Redhead
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK.
| | - Linda May
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0QB, UK
| | - Tom H Oliver
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK
| | - Perrine Hamel
- Natural Capital Project, Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, 371 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Richard Sharp
- Natural Capital Project, Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, 371 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - James M Bullock
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Carvell C, Bourke AFG, Dreier S, Freeman SN, Hulmes S, Jordan WC, Redhead JW, Sumner S, Wang J, Heard MS. Bumblebee family lineage survival is enhanced in high-quality landscapes. Nature 2017; 543:547-549. [DOI: 10.1038/nature21709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2016] [Accepted: 02/15/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
|
18
|
Redhead JW, Stratford C, Sharps K, Jones L, Ziv G, Clarke D, Oliver TH, Bullock JM. Empirical validation of the InVEST water yield ecosystem service model at a national scale. Sci Total Environ 2016; 569-570:1418-1426. [PMID: 27395076 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2016] [Revised: 06/28/2016] [Accepted: 06/28/2016] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
A variety of tools have emerged with the goal of mapping the current delivery of ecosystem services and quantifying the impact of environmental changes. An important and often overlooked question is how accurate the outputs of these models are in relation to empirical observations. In this paper we validate a hydrological ecosystem service model (InVEST Water Yield Model) using widely available data. We modelled annual water yield in 22 UK catchments with widely varying land cover, population and geology, and compared model outputs with gauged river flow data from the UK National River Flow Archive. Values for input parameters were selected from existing literature to reflect conditions in the UK and were subjected to sensitivity analyses. We also compared model performance between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration data sourced from global- and UK-scale datasets. We then tested the transferability of the results within the UK by additional validation in a further 20 catchments. Whilst the model performed only moderately with global-scale data (linear regression of modelled total water yield against empirical data; slope=0.763, intercept=54.45, R(2)=0.963) with wide variation in performance between catchments, the model performed much better when using UK-scale input data, with closer fit to the observed data (slope=1.07, intercept=3.07, R(2)=0.990). With UK data the majority of catchments showed <10% difference between measured and modelled water yield but there was a minor but consistent overestimate per hectare (86m(3)/ha/year). Additional validation on a further 20 UK catchments was similarly robust, indicating that these results are transferable within the UK. These results suggest that relatively simple models can give accurate measures of ecosystem services. However, the choice of input data is critical and there is a need for further validation in other parts of the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J W Redhead
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK.
| | - C Stratford
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK
| | - K Sharps
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK
| | - L Jones
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK
| | - G Ziv
- School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - D Clarke
- Faculty of Engineering and Environment, University of Southampton, University Road, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - T H Oliver
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK
| | - J M Bullock
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Redhead JW, Dreier S, Bourke AFG, Heard MS, Jordan WC, Sumner S, Wang J, Carvell C. Effects of habitat composition and landscape structure on worker foraging distances of five bumble bee species. Ecol Appl 2016; 26:726-739. [PMID: 27411246 DOI: 10.1890/15-0546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Bumble bees (Bombus spp.) are important pollinators of both crops and wildflowers. Their contribution to this essential ecosystem service has been threatened over recent decades by changes in land use, which have led to declines in their populations. In order to design effective conservation measures, it is important to understand the effects of variation in landscape composition and structure on the foraging activities of worker bumble bees. This is because the viability of individual colonies is likely to be affected by the trade-off between the energetic costs of foraging over greater distances and the potential gains from access to additional resources. We used field surveys, molecular genetics, and fine resolution remote sensing to estimate the locations of wild bumble bee nests and to infer foraging distances across a 20-km² agricultural landscape in southern England, UK. We investigated five species, including the rare B. ruderatus and ecologically similar but widespread B. hortorum. We compared worker foraging distances between species and examined how variation in landscape composition and structure affected foraging distances at the colony level. Mean worker foraging distances differed significantly between species. Bombus terrestris, B. lapidarius, and B. ruderatus exhibited significantly greater mean foraging distances (551, 536, and 501 m, respectively) than B. hortorum and B. pascuorum (336 and 272 m, respectively). There was wide variation in worker foraging distances between colonies of the same species, which was in turn strongly influenced by the amount and spatial configuration of available foraging habitats. Shorter foraging distances were found for colonies where the local landscape had high coverage and low fragmentation of semi-natural vegetation, including managed agri-environmental field margins. The strength of relationships between different landscape variables and foraging distance varied between species, for example the strongest relationship for B. ruderatus being with floral cover of preferred forage plants. Our findings suggest that management of landscape composition and configuration has the potential to reduce foraging distances across a range of bumble bee species. There is thus potential for improvements in the design and implementation of landscape management options, such as agri-environment schemes, aimed at providing foraging habitat for bumble bees and enhancing crop pollination services.
Collapse
|
20
|
Ridding LE, Redhead JW, Pywell RF. Fate of semi-natural grassland in England between 1960 and 2013: A test of national conservation policy. Glob Ecol Conserv 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2015.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
21
|
Dreier S, Redhead JW, Warren IA, Bourke AFG, Heard MS, Jordan WC, Sumner S, Wang J, Carvell C. Fine-scale spatial genetic structure of common and declining bumble bees across an agricultural landscape. Mol Ecol 2014; 23:3384-95. [PMID: 24980963 PMCID: PMC4142012 DOI: 10.1111/mec.12823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2014] [Revised: 05/07/2014] [Accepted: 05/21/2014] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Land-use changes have threatened populations of many insect pollinators, including bumble bees. Patterns of dispersal and gene flow are key determinants of species' ability to respond to land-use change, but have been little investigated at a fine scale (<10 km) in bumble bees. Using microsatellite markers, we determined the fine-scale spatial genetic structure of populations of four common Bombus species (B. terrestris, B. lapidarius, B. pascuorum and B. hortorum) and one declining species (B. ruderatus) in an agricultural landscape in Southern England, UK. The study landscape contained sown flower patches representing agri-environment options for pollinators. We found that, as expected, the B. ruderatus population was characterized by relatively low heterozygosity, number of alleles and colony density. Across all species, inbreeding was absent or present but weak (FIS = 0.01-0.02). Using queen genotypes reconstructed from worker sibships and colony locations estimated from the positions of workers within these sibships, we found that significant isolation by distance was absent in B. lapidarius, B. hortorum and B. ruderatus. In B. terrestris and B. pascuorum, it was present but weak; for example, in these two species, expected relatedness of queens founding colonies 1 m apart was 0.02. These results show that bumble bee populations exhibit low levels of spatial genetic structure at fine spatial scales, most likely because of ongoing gene flow via widespread queen dispersal. In addition, the results demonstrate the potential for agri-environment scheme conservation measures to facilitate fine-scale gene flow by creating a more even distribution of suitable habitats across landscapes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Dreier
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK; School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol, BS8 1UG, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Carvell C, Jordan WC, Bourke AFG, Pickles R, Redhead JW, Heard MS. Molecular and spatial analyses reveal links between colony-specific foraging distance and landscape-level resource availability in two bumblebee species. OIKOS 2011. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19832.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
23
|
Fraser SEM, Beresford AE, Peters J, Redhead JW, Welch AJ, Mayhew PJ, Dytham C. Effectiveness of vegetation surrogates for parasitoid wasps in reserve selection. Conserv Biol 2009; 23:142-150. [PMID: 18798853 DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01069.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Selecting suitable nature reserves is a continuing challenge in conservation, particularly for target groups that are time-consuming to survey, species rich, and extinction prone. One such group is the parasitoid Hymenoptera, which have been excluded from conservation planning. If basic characteristics of habitats or vegetation could be used as reliable surrogates of specific target taxa, this would greatly facilitate appropriate reserve selection. We identified a range of potential habitat indicators of the species richness of pimpline parasitoid communities (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Pimplinae, Diacritinae, Poemeniinae) and tested their efficiency at capturing the observed diversity in a group of small woodlands in the agricultural landscape of the Vale of York (United Kingdom). Eight of the 18 vegetation-based reserve-selection strategies were significantly better at parasitoid species inclusion than random selection of areas. The best strategy maximized richness of tree species over the entire reserve network through complementarity. This strategy omitted only 2-3 species more (out of 38 captured in the landscape as a whole) than selections derived from the parasitoid survey data. In general, strategies worked equally well at capturing species richness and rarity. Our results suggest that vegetation data as a surrogate for species richness could prove an informative tool in parasitoid conservation, but further work is needed to test how broadly applicable these indicators may be.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally E M Fraser
- Department of Biology, University of York, PO Box 373, York YO10 5YW, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|