1
|
Harvey CA, Pritts AA, Zwetsloot MJ, Jansen K, Pulleman MM, Armbrecht I, Avelino J, Barrera JF, Bunn C, García JH, Isaza C, Munoz-Ucros J, Pérez-Alemán CJ, Rahn E, Robiglio V, Somarriba E, Valencia V. Transformation of coffee-growing landscapes across Latin America. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 2021; 41:62. [PMID: 34484434 PMCID: PMC8406019 DOI: 10.1007/s13593-021-00712-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED In Latin America, the cultivation of Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) plays a critical role in rural livelihoods, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable development. Over the last 20 years, coffee farms and landscapes across the region have undergone rapid and profound biophysical changes in response to low coffee prices, changing climatic conditions, severe plant pathogen outbreaks, and other drivers. Although these biophysical transformations are pervasive and affect millions of rural livelihoods, there is limited information on the types, location, and extent of landscape changes and their socioeconomic and ecological consequences. Here we review the state of knowledge on the ongoing biophysical changes in coffee-growing regions, explore the potential socioeconomic and ecological impacts of these changes, and highlight key research gaps. We identify seven major land-use trends which are affecting the sustainability of coffee-growing regions across Latin America in different ways. These trends include (1) the widespread shift to disease-resistant cultivars, (2) the conventional intensification of coffee management with greater planting densities, greater use of agrochemicals and less shade, (3) the conversion of coffee to other agricultural land uses, (4) the introduction of Robusta coffee (Coffea canephora) into areas not previously cultivated with coffee, (5) the expansion of coffee into forested areas, (6) the urbanization of coffee landscapes, and (7) the increase in the area of coffee produced under voluntary sustainability standards. Our review highlights the incomplete and scattered information on the drivers, patterns, and outcomes of biophysical changes in coffee landscapes, and lays out a detailed research agenda to address these research gaps and elucidate the effects of different landscape trajectories on rural livelihoods, biodiversity conservation, and other aspects of sustainable development. A better understanding of the drivers, patterns, and consequences of changes in coffee landscapes is vital for informing the design of policies, programs, and incentives for sustainable coffee production. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13593-021-00712-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celia A. Harvey
- Monteverde Institute, Apdo.69-5655, Monteverde, Puntarenas, Costa Rica
| | - Alyssa A. Pritts
- Farming Systems Ecology Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marie J. Zwetsloot
- Soil Biology Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Kees Jansen
- Rural Sociology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam M. Pulleman
- Soil Biology Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
- The International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Km 17 Recta Cali-Palmira, AA 6713, 763537 Cali, Colombia
| | - Inge Armbrecht
- Departamento de Biología, Universidad del Valle, Calle 13 # 100-00 ed, 320 Cali, Colombia
| | - Jacques Avelino
- CIRAD, UMR PHIM, San José, Costa Rica
- PHIM, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, IRD, Montpellier, France
- Program of Agriculture, Livestock and Agroforestry, CATIE, Turrialba, 7170 Costa Rica
- IICA, 2200 Coronado, San José, AP 55 Costa Rica
| | - Juan F. Barrera
- Arthropod Ecology and Pest Management Group, Department of Agriculture, Society and Environment, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Carretera Antiguo Aeropuerto km 2.5, 30700 Tapachula, Chiapas Mexico
| | - Christian Bunn
- The International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Km 17 Recta Cali-Palmira, AA 6713, 763537 Cali, Colombia
- University of Göttingen, Platz der Göttinger Sieben 5, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Javier Hoyos García
- Parque Tecnológico de Innovación TECNiCAFÉ, Cra 17 # 48 N 18 Casa 53 Conjunto Cerrado Entrepinos, Popayán, Cauca Colombia
| | - Carlos Isaza
- Programa de Café para Solidaridad en Colombia, Solidaridad, Calle 43 N, °23-78 Manizales, Colombia
| | - Juana Munoz-Ucros
- School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, 236 Tower Rd, Ithaca, NY USA
| | - Carlos J. Pérez-Alemán
- Fundación Solidaridad Latinoamericana, Calle Evelio Lara No. 131-B, Ciudad del Saber, Ciudad de Panamá, Panamá
| | - Eric Rahn
- The International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Km 17 Recta Cali-Palmira, AA 6713, 763537 Cali, Colombia
| | - Valentina Robiglio
- World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), c/o CIP, Av. La Molina 1895, P.O Box 1558, 12 Lima, Peru
| | - Eduardo Somarriba
- Program of Agriculture, Livestock and Agroforestry, CATIE, Turrialba, 7170 Costa Rica
| | - Vivian Valencia
- Farming Systems Ecology Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Vermicompost application has been shown to promote plant growth, alter the rhizosphere microbiome, and suppress plant pathogens. These beneficial properties are often attributed to the activity of vermicompost-associated microorganisms. However, little is known about the microbial shifts that occur in the rhizosphere after vermicompost application. To better understand the impact of vermicompost treatments on the assembly of rhizosphere bacterial communities, 16S rDNA communities of vermicompost and rhizospheres of each peat- and soil-grown tomatoes were profiled after conventional fertigation, irrigation without additional nutrients, and addition of three different vermicompost-extracts. The full dataset consisted of 412 identified genera, of which 317 remained following stringent quality filtration. Tomato rhizosphere microbiome responses to treatments were complex and unique between peat and soil growth substrates. Direct colonization of vermicompost-origin taxa into rhizospheres was limited, with genera Photobacterium and Luteimonas colonizing peat rhizospheres, genera Truepera, Phenylobacterium, and Lysinibacillus colonizing soil rhizospheres, and genus Pelagibius appearing in both soil and peat rhizospheres. Further patterns of differential abundance and presence/absence between treatments highlight vermicompost-mediated effects on rhizosphere microbiome assembly as an interplay of rhizosphere medium, direct colonization of vermicompost-origin taxa and vermicompost-induced shifts in the rhizosphere microbial community. This exploratory analysis is intended to provide an initial look at 16S community composition of vermicompost and the effects of vermicompost treatment on the rhizosphere microbiome assembly to highlight interactions of potential merit for subsequent investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juana Munoz-Ucros
- Horticulture Section, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| | - Kevin Panke-Buisse
- US Dairy Forage Research Center, USDA ARS, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Jamison Robe
- US Dairy Forage Research Center, USDA ARS, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|