1
|
Dapkūnas J, Timinskas A, Olechnovič K, Tomkuvienė M, Venclovas Č. PPI3D: a web server for searching, analyzing and modeling protein-protein, protein-peptide and protein-nucleic acid interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 2024:gkae278. [PMID: 38619046 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Structure-resolved protein interactions with other proteins, peptides and nucleic acids are key for understanding molecular mechanisms. The PPI3D web server enables researchers to query preprocessed and clustered structural data, analyze the results and make homology-based inferences for protein interactions. PPI3D offers three interaction exploration modes: (i) all interactions for proteins homologous to the query, (ii) interactions between two proteins or their homologs and (iii) interactions within a specific PDB entry. The server allows interactive analysis of the identified interactions in both summarized and detailed manner. This includes protein annotations, structures, the interface residues and the corresponding contact surface areas. In addition, users can make inferences about residues at the interaction interface for the query protein(s) from the sequence alignments and homology models. The weekly updated PPI3D database includes all the interaction interfaces and binding sites from PDB, clustered based on both protein sequence and structural similarity, yielding non-redundant datasets without loss of alternative interaction modes. Consequently, the PPI3D users avoid being flooded with redundant information, a typical situation for intensely studied proteins. Furthermore, PPI3D provides a possibility to download user-defined sets of interaction interfaces and analyze them locally. The PPI3D web server is available at https://bioinformatics.lt/ppi3d.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justas Dapkūnas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio av. 7, Vilnius LT-10257, Lithuania
| | - Albertas Timinskas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio av. 7, Vilnius LT-10257, Lithuania
| | - Kliment Olechnovič
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio av. 7, Vilnius LT-10257, Lithuania
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LJK, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Miglė Tomkuvienė
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio av. 7, Vilnius LT-10257, Lithuania
| | - Česlovas Venclovas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio av. 7, Vilnius LT-10257, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Olechnovič K, Valančauskas L, Dapkūnas J, Venclovas Č. Prediction of protein assemblies by structure sampling followed by interface-focused scoring. Proteins 2023; 91:1724-1733. [PMID: 37578163 DOI: 10.1002/prot.26569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
Proteins often function as part of permanent or transient multimeric complexes, and understanding function of these assemblies requires knowledge of their three-dimensional structures. While the ability of AlphaFold to predict structures of individual proteins with unprecedented accuracy has revolutionized structural biology, modeling structures of protein assemblies remains challenging. To address this challenge, we developed a protocol for predicting structures of protein complexes involving model sampling followed by scoring focused on the subunit-subunit interaction interface. In this protocol, we diversified AlphaFold models by varying construction and pairing of multiple sequence alignments as well as increasing the number of recycles. In cases when AlphaFold failed to assemble a full protein complex or produced unreliable results, additional diverse models were constructed by docking of monomers or subcomplexes. All the models were then scored using a newly developed method, VoroIF-jury, which relies only on structural information. Notably, VoroIF-jury is independent of AlphaFold self-assessment scores and therefore can be used to rank models originating from different structure prediction methods. We tested our protocol in CASP15 and obtained top results, significantly outperforming the standard AlphaFold-Multimer pipeline. Analysis of our results showed that the accuracy of our assembly models was capped mainly by structure sampling rather than model scoring. This observation suggests that better sampling, especially for the antibody-antigen complexes, may lead to further improvement. Our protocol is expected to be useful for modeling and/or scoring protein assemblies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kliment Olechnovič
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Lukas Valančauskas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Justas Dapkūnas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Česlovas Venclovas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dapkūnas J, Margelevičius M. The COMER web server for protein analysis by homology. Bioinformatics 2022; 39:6909010. [PMID: 36519835 PMCID: PMC9825750 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
SUMMARY Sequence homology is a basic concept in protein evolution, structure and function studies. However, there are not many different tools and services for homology searches being sensitive, accurate and fast at the same time. We present a new web server for protein analysis based on COMER2, a sequence alignment and homology search method that exhibits these characteristics. COMER2 has been upgraded since its last publication to improve its alignment quality and ease of use. We demonstrate how the user can benefit from using it by providing examples of extensive annotation of proteins of unknown function. Among the distinctive features of the web server is the user's ability to submit multiple queries with one click of a button. This and other features allow for transparently running homology searches-in a command-line, programmatic or graphical environment-across multiple databases with multiple queries. They also promote extensive simultaneous protein analysis at the sequence, structure and function levels. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION The COMER web server is available at https://bioinformatics.lt/comer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Collapse
|
4
|
Lensink MF, Brysbaert G, Mauri T, Nadzirin N, Velankar S, Chaleil RAG, Clarence T, Bates PA, Kong R, Liu B, Yang G, Liu M, Shi H, Lu X, Chang S, Roy RS, Quadir F, Liu J, Cheng J, Antoniak A, Czaplewski C, Giełdoń A, Kogut M, Lipska AG, Liwo A, Lubecka EA, Maszota-Zieleniak M, Sieradzan AK, Ślusarz R, Wesołowski PA, Zięba K, Del Carpio Muñoz CA, Ichiishi E, Harmalkar A, Gray JJ, Bonvin AMJJ, Ambrosetti F, Vargas Honorato R, Jandova Z, Jiménez-García B, Koukos PI, Van Keulen S, Van Noort CW, Réau M, Roel-Touris J, Kotelnikov S, Padhorny D, Porter KA, Alekseenko A, Ignatov M, Desta I, Ashizawa R, Sun Z, Ghani U, Hashemi N, Vajda S, Kozakov D, Rosell M, Rodríguez-Lumbreras LA, Fernandez-Recio J, Karczynska A, Grudinin S, Yan Y, Li H, Lin P, Huang SY, Christoffer C, Terashi G, Verburgt J, Sarkar D, Aderinwale T, Wang X, Kihara D, Nakamura T, Hanazono Y, Gowthaman R, Guest JD, Yin R, Taherzadeh G, Pierce BG, Barradas-Bautista D, Cao Z, Cavallo L, Oliva R, Sun Y, Zhu S, Shen Y, Park T, Woo H, Yang J, Kwon S, Won J, Seok C, Kiyota Y, Kobayashi S, Harada Y, Takeda-Shitaka M, Kundrotas PJ, Singh A, Vakser IA, Dapkūnas J, Olechnovič K, Venclovas Č, Duan R, Qiu L, Xu X, Zhang S, Zou X, Wodak SJ. Prediction of protein assemblies, the next frontier: The CASP14-CAPRI experiment. Proteins 2021; 89:1800-1823. [PMID: 34453465 PMCID: PMC8616814 DOI: 10.1002/prot.26222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 07/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
We present the results for CAPRI Round 50, the fourth joint CASP-CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge. The Round comprised a total of twelve targets, including six dimers, three trimers, and three higher-order oligomers. Four of these were easy targets, for which good structural templates were available either for the full assembly, or for the main interfaces (of the higher-order oligomers). Eight were difficult targets for which only distantly related templates were found for the individual subunits. Twenty-five CAPRI groups including eight automatic servers submitted ~1250 models per target. Twenty groups including six servers participated in the CAPRI scoring challenge submitted ~190 models per target. The accuracy of the predicted models was evaluated using the classical CAPRI criteria. The prediction performance was measured by a weighted scoring scheme that takes into account the number of models of acceptable quality or higher submitted by each group as part of their five top-ranking models. Compared to the previous CASP-CAPRI challenge, top performing groups submitted such models for a larger fraction (70-75%) of the targets in this Round, but fewer of these models were of high accuracy. Scorer groups achieved stronger performance with more groups submitting correct models for 70-80% of the targets or achieving high accuracy predictions. Servers performed less well in general, except for the MDOCKPP and LZERD servers, who performed on par with human groups. In addition to these results, major advances in methodology are discussed, providing an informative overview of where the prediction of protein assemblies currently stands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc F Lensink
- CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Institute for Structural and Functional Glycobiology, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Guillaume Brysbaert
- CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Institute for Structural and Functional Glycobiology, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Théo Mauri
- CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Institute for Structural and Functional Glycobiology, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Nurul Nadzirin
- Protein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe), European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, UK
| | - Sameer Velankar
- Protein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe), European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Tereza Clarence
- Biomolecular Modelling Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Paul A Bates
- Biomolecular Modelling Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Ren Kong
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Bin Liu
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Guangbo Yang
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Ming Liu
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Hang Shi
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Xufeng Lu
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Shan Chang
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Raj S Roy
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Farhan Quadir
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Jian Liu
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Jianlin Cheng
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
- Institute for Data Science and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Anna Antoniak
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | | | - Artur Giełdoń
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Mateusz Kogut
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | | | - Adam Liwo
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Emilia A Lubecka
- Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland
| | | | | | - Rafał Ślusarz
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Patryk A Wesołowski
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
- Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdansk and Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Karolina Zięba
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | | | - Eiichiro Ichiishi
- International University of Health and Welfare Hospital (IUHW Hospital), Nasushiobara City, Japan
| | - Ameya Harmalkar
- Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Gray
- Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Alexandre M J J Bonvin
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Ambrosetti
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rodrigo Vargas Honorato
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Zuzana Jandova
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Brian Jiménez-García
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Panagiotis I Koukos
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Siri Van Keulen
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte W Van Noort
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Manon Réau
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jorge Roel-Touris
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sergei Kotelnikov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Innopolis University, Russia
| | - Dzmitry Padhorny
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Kathryn A Porter
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrey Alekseenko
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Institute of Computer-Aided Design of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Mikhail Ignatov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Israel Desta
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ryota Ashizawa
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Zhuyezi Sun
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Usman Ghani
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nasser Hashemi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sandor Vajda
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dima Kozakov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Mireia Rosell
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV), CSIC - Universidad de la Rioja - Gobierno de La Rioja, Logrono, Spain
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luis A Rodríguez-Lumbreras
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV), CSIC - Universidad de la Rioja - Gobierno de La Rioja, Logrono, Spain
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Fernandez-Recio
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV), CSIC - Universidad de la Rioja - Gobierno de La Rioja, Logrono, Spain
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Sergei Grudinin
- Université Grenoble Alpes, Inria, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LJK, Grenoble, France
| | - Yumeng Yan
- School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Hao Li
- School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Peicong Lin
- School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Sheng-You Huang
- School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Charles Christoffer
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Genki Terashi
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Jacob Verburgt
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Daipayan Sarkar
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Tunde Aderinwale
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Xiao Wang
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Daisuke Kihara
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Tsukasa Nakamura
- Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Yuya Hanazono
- Institute for Quantum Life Science, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Tokai, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Ragul Gowthaman
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, Maryland, USA
| | - Johnathan D Guest
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, Maryland, USA
| | - Rui Yin
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, Maryland, USA
| | - Ghazaleh Taherzadeh
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, Maryland, USA
| | - Brian G Pierce
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Zhen Cao
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
| | - Luigi Cavallo
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
| | - Romina Oliva
- University of Naples "Parthenope", Napoli, Italy
| | - Yuanfei Sun
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA
| | - Shaowen Zhu
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA
| | - Yang Shen
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA
| | - Taeyong Park
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeonuk Woo
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinsol Yang
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sohee Kwon
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jonghun Won
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chaok Seok
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yasuomi Kiyota
- School of Pharmacy, Kitasato University, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Yoshiki Harada
- School of Pharmacy, Kitasato University, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Petras J Kundrotas
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| | - Amar Singh
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| | - Ilya A Vakser
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| | - Justas Dapkūnas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Kliment Olechnovič
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Česlovas Venclovas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Rui Duan
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Liming Qiu
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Xianjin Xu
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Shuang Zhang
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Xiaoqin Zou
- Institute for Data Science and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dapkūnas J, Olechnovič K, Venclovas Č. Modeling of protein complexes in CASP14 with emphasis on the interaction interface prediction. Proteins 2021; 89:1834-1843. [PMID: 34176161 PMCID: PMC9292421 DOI: 10.1002/prot.26167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The goal of CASP experiments is to monitor the progress in the protein structure prediction field. During the 14th CASP edition we aimed to test our capabilities of predicting structures of protein complexes. Our protocol for modeling protein assemblies included both template‐based modeling and free docking. Structural templates were identified using sensitive sequence‐based searches. If sequence‐based searches failed, we performed structure‐based template searches using selected CASP server models. In the absence of reliable templates we applied free docking starting from monomers generated by CASP servers. We evaluated and ranked models of protein complexes using an improved version of our protein structure quality assessment method, VoroMQA, taking into account both interaction interface and global structure scores. If reliable templates could be identified, generally accurate models of protein assemblies were generated with the exception of an antibody‐antigen interaction. The success of free docking mainly depended on the accuracy of initial subunit models and on the scoring of docking solutions. To put our overall results in perspective, we analyzed our performance in the context of other CASP groups. Although the subunits in our assembly models often were not of the top quality, these models had, overall, the best‐predicted intersubunit interfaces according to several accuracy measures. We attribute our relative success primarily to the emphasis on the interaction interface when modeling and scoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justas Dapkūnas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Kliment Olechnovič
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Česlovas Venclovas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
There is a large gap between the numbers of known protein-protein interactions and the corresponding experimentally solved structures of protein complexes. Fortunately, this gap can be in part bridged by computational structure modeling methods. Currently, template-based modeling is the most accurate means to predict both individual protein structures and protein complexes. One of the major issues in template-based modeling is to identify homologous structures that could be utilized as templates. To simplify this task, we have developed the PPI3D web server. The server is not only able to search for homologous protein complexes, but also provides means to analyze identified interactions and to model protein complexes. In recent CASP and CAPRI experiments, PPI3D proved to be a useful tool for homology modeling of multimeric proteins. In this chapter, we provide a brief description of the PPI3D web server capabilities and how to use the server for modeling of protein complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justas Dapkūnas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Česlovas Venclovas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lensink MF, Brysbaert G, Nadzirin N, Velankar S, Chaleil RAG, Gerguri T, Bates PA, Laine E, Carbone A, Grudinin S, Kong R, Liu RR, Xu XM, Shi H, Chang S, Eisenstein M, Karczynska A, Czaplewski C, Lubecka E, Lipska A, Krupa P, Mozolewska M, Golon Ł, Samsonov S, Liwo A, Crivelli S, Pagès G, Karasikov M, Kadukova M, Yan Y, Huang SY, Rosell M, Rodríguez-Lumbreras LA, Romero-Durana M, Díaz-Bueno L, Fernandez-Recio J, Christoffer C, Terashi G, Shin WH, Aderinwale T, Subraman SRMV, Kihara D, Kozakov D, Vajda S, Porter K, Padhorny D, Desta I, Beglov D, Ignatov M, Kotelnikov S, Moal IH, Ritchie DW, de Beauchêne IC, Maigret B, Devignes MD, Echartea MER, Barradas-Bautista D, Cao Z, Cavallo L, Oliva R, Cao Y, Shen Y, Baek M, Park T, Woo H, Seok C, Braitbard M, Bitton L, Scheidman-Duhovny D, Dapkūnas J, Olechnovič K, Venclovas Č, Kundrotas PJ, Belkin S, Chakravarty D, Badal VD, Vakser IA, Vreven T, Vangaveti S, Borrman T, Weng Z, Guest JD, Gowthaman R, Pierce BG, Xu X, Duan R, Qiu L, Hou J, Merideth BR, Ma Z, Cheng J, Zou X, Koukos PI, Roel-Touris J, Ambrosetti F, Geng C, Schaarschmidt J, Trellet ME, Melquiond ASJ, Xue L, Jiménez-García B, van Noort CW, Honorato RV, Bonvin AMJJ, Wodak SJ. Blind prediction of homo- and hetero-protein complexes: The CASP13-CAPRI experiment. Proteins 2019; 87:1200-1221. [PMID: 31612567 PMCID: PMC7274794 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
We present the results for CAPRI Round 46, the third joint CASP-CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge. The Round comprised a total of 20 targets including 14 homo-oligomers and 6 heterocomplexes. Eight of the homo-oligomer targets and one heterodimer comprised proteins that could be readily modeled using templates from the Protein Data Bank, often available for the full assembly. The remaining 11 targets comprised 5 homodimers, 3 heterodimers, and two higher-order assemblies. These were more difficult to model, as their prediction mainly involved "ab-initio" docking of subunit models derived from distantly related templates. A total of ~30 CAPRI groups, including 9 automatic servers, submitted on average ~2000 models per target. About 17 groups participated in the CAPRI scoring rounds, offered for most targets, submitting ~170 models per target. The prediction performance, measured by the fraction of models of acceptable quality or higher submitted across all predictors groups, was very good to excellent for the nine easy targets. Poorer performance was achieved by predictors for the 11 difficult targets, with medium and high quality models submitted for only 3 of these targets. A similar performance "gap" was displayed by scorer groups, highlighting yet again the unmet challenge of modeling the conformational changes of the protein components that occur upon binding or that must be accounted for in template-based modeling. Our analysis also indicates that residues in binding interfaces were less well predicted in this set of targets than in previous Rounds, providing useful insights for directions of future improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc F. Lensink
- University of Lille, CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, Lille, France
| | - Guillaume Brysbaert
- University of Lille, CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, Lille, France
| | - Nurul Nadzirin
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sameer Velankar
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Tereza Gerguri
- Biomolecular Modelling Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Paul A. Bates
- Biomolecular Modelling Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Elodie Laine
- CNRS, IBPS, Laboratoire de Biologie Computationnelle et Quantitative (LCQB), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Alessandra Carbone
- CNRS, IBPS, Laboratoire de Biologie Computationnelle et Quantitative (LCQB), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), Paris, France
| | - Sergei Grudinin
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inria, Grenoble INP, LJK, Grenoble, France
| | - Ren Kong
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Ran-Ran Liu
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Xi-Ming Xu
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Hang Shi
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Shan Chang
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Miriam Eisenstein
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | | | | | - Emilia Lubecka
- Institute of Informatics, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics, and Informatics, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | | | - Paweł Krupa
- Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physics, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Łukasz Golon
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | | | - Adam Liwo
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
- School of Computational Sciences, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Guillaume Pagès
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inria, Grenoble INP, LJK, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Maria Kadukova
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inria, Grenoble INP, LJK, Grenoble, France
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudniy, Russia
| | - Yumeng Yan
- School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Sheng-You Huang
- School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Mireia Rosell
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV-CSIC), Logroño, Spain
| | - Luis A. Rodríguez-Lumbreras
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV-CSIC), Logroño, Spain
| | | | | | - Juan Fernandez-Recio
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV-CSIC), Logroño, Spain
- Instituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona (IBMB-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Genki Terashi
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
| | - Woong-Hee Shin
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
| | - Tunde Aderinwale
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
| | | | - Daisuke Kihara
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
| | - Dima Kozakov
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Sandor Vajda
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kathryn Porter
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dzmitry Padhorny
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Israel Desta
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dmitri Beglov
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mikhail Ignatov
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Sergey Kotelnikov
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudniy, Russia
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Iain H. Moal
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Didier Barradas-Bautista
- Physical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
| | - Zhen Cao
- Physical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
| | - Luigi Cavallo
- Physical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
| | - Romina Oliva
- Department of Sciences and Technologies, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Napoli, Italy
| | - Yue Cao
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
| | - Yang Shen
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
| | - Minkyung Baek
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Taeyong Park
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeonuk Woo
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chaok Seok
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Merav Braitbard
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Institute of Live Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Lirane Bitton
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Dina Scheidman-Duhovny
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Institute of Live Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Justas Dapkūnas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Kliment Olechnovič
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Česlovas Venclovas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Petras J. Kundrotas
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas
| | - Saveliy Belkin
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas
| | - Devlina Chakravarty
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas
| | - Varsha D. Badal
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas
| | - Ilya A. Vakser
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas
| | - Thom Vreven
- Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Sweta Vangaveti
- Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Tyler Borrman
- Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Zhiping Weng
- Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Johnathan D. Guest
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
| | - Ragul Gowthaman
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
| | - Brian G. Pierce
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
| | - Xianjin Xu
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Rui Duan
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Liming Qiu
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Jie Hou
- Department of Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Benjamin Ryan Merideth
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
- Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Zhiwei Ma
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Jianlin Cheng
- Department of Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
- Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Xiaoqin Zou
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
- Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Panagiotis I. Koukos
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jorge Roel-Touris
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Ambrosetti
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cunliang Geng
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jörg Schaarschmidt
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mikael E. Trellet
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Adrien S. J. Melquiond
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Li Xue
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Brian Jiménez-García
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte W. van Noort
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rodrigo V. Honorato
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dapkūnas J, Kairys V, Olechnovič K, Venclovas Č. Template-based modeling of diverse protein interactions in CAPRI rounds 38-45. Proteins 2019; 88:939-947. [PMID: 31697420 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Structures of proteins complexed with other proteins, peptides, or ligands are essential for investigation of molecular mechanisms. However, the experimental structures of protein complexes of interest are often not available. Therefore, computational methods are widely used to predict these structures, and, of those methods, template-based modeling is the most successful. In the rounds 38-45 of the Critical Assessment of PRediction of Interactions (CAPRI), we applied template-based modeling for 9 of 11 protein-protein and protein-peptide interaction targets, resulting in medium and high-quality models for six targets. For the protein-oligosaccharide docking targets, we used constraints derived from template structures, and generated models of at least acceptable quality for most of the targets. Apparently, high flexibility of oligosaccharide molecules was the main cause preventing us from obtaining models of higher quality. We also participated in the CAPRI scoring challenge, the goal of which was to identify the highest quality models from a large pool of decoys. In this experiment, we tested VoroMQA, a scoring method based on interatomic contact areas. The results showed VoroMQA to be quite effective in scoring strongly binding and obligatory protein complexes, but less successful in the case of transient interactions. We extensively used manual intervention in both CAPRI modeling and scoring experiments. This oftentimes allowed us to select the correct templates from available alternatives and to limit the search space during the model scoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justas Dapkūnas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Visvaldas Kairys
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Kliment Olechnovič
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Česlovas Venclovas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dapkūnas J, Olechnovič K, Venclovas Č. Structural modeling of protein complexes: Current capabilities and challenges. Proteins 2019; 87:1222-1232. [PMID: 31294859 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Proteins frequently interact with each other, and the knowledge of structures of the corresponding protein complexes is necessary to understand how they function. Computational methods are increasingly used to provide structural models of protein complexes. Not surprisingly, community-wide Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction (CASP) experiments have recently started monitoring the progress in this research area. We participated in CASP13 with the aim to evaluate our current capabilities in modeling of protein complexes and to gain a better understanding of factors that exert the largest impact on these capabilities. To model protein complexes in CASP13, we applied template-based modeling, free docking and hybrid techniques that enabled us to generate models of the topmost quality for 27 of 42 multimers. If templates for protein complexes could be identified, we modeled the structures with reasonable accuracy by straightforward homology modeling. If only partial templates were available, it was nevertheless possible to predict the interaction interfaces correctly or to generate acceptable models for protein complexes by combining template-based modeling with docking. If no templates were available, we used rigid-body docking with limited success. However, in some free docking models, despite the incorrect subunit orientation and missed interface contacts, the approximate location of protein binding sites was identified correctly. Apparently, our overall performance in docking was limited by the quality of monomer models and by the imperfection of scoring methods. The impact of human intervention on our results in modeling of protein complexes was significant indicating the need for improvements of automatic methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justas Dapkūnas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Kliment Olechnovič
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Česlovas Venclovas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dapkūnas J, Olechnovič K, Venclovas Č. Modeling of protein complexes in CAPRI Round 37 using template-based approach combined with model selection. Proteins 2017; 86 Suppl 1:292-301. [DOI: 10.1002/prot.25378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2017] [Revised: 08/25/2017] [Accepted: 09/10/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Justas Dapkūnas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio 7; Vilnius LT-10257 Lithuania
| | - Kliment Olechnovič
- Institute of Biotechnology, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio 7; Vilnius LT-10257 Lithuania
| | - Česlovas Venclovas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio 7; Vilnius LT-10257 Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Moal IH, Dapkūnas J, Fernández-Recio J. Inferring the microscopic surface energy of protein-protein interfaces from mutation data. Proteins 2015; 83:640-50. [PMID: 25586563 DOI: 10.1002/prot.24761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2014] [Revised: 12/04/2014] [Accepted: 12/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Mutations at protein-protein recognition sites alter binding strength by altering the chemical nature of the interacting surfaces. We present a simple surface energy model, parameterized with empirical ΔΔG values, yielding mean energies of -48 cal mol(-1) Å(-2) for interactions between hydrophobic surfaces, -51 to -80 cal mol(-1) Å(-2) for surfaces of complementary charge, and 66-83 cal mol(-1) Å(-2) for electrostatically repelling surfaces, relative to the aqueous phase. This places the mean energy of hydrophobic surface burial at -24 cal mol(-1) Å(-2) . Despite neglecting configurational entropy and intramolecular changes, the model correlates with empirical binding free energies of a functionally diverse set of rigid-body interactions (r = 0.66). When used to rerank docking poses, it can place near-native solutions in the top 10 for 37% of the complexes evaluated, and 82% in the top 100. The method shows that hydrophobic burial is the driving force for protein association, accounting for 50-95% of the cohesive energy. The model is available open-source from http://life.bsc.es/pid/web/surface_energy/ and via the CCharpPPI web server http://life.bsc.es/pid/ccharppi/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iain H Moal
- Joint BSC-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology, Life Science Department, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, 08034, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|