1
|
Ladin K. Barriers and Facilitators in Advance Care Planning Visits for Medicare Patients: Evidence from National Case Studies. Health Serv Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
2
|
Ashana D, Reich A, Gupta A, Perez S, D'Arcangelo N, Gazarian P, Tjia J, Halpern S, Weissman J, Ladin K. Clinician Perspectives on Barriers to Advance Care Planning Among Vulnerable Patients. Health Serv Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- D. Ashana
- University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA United States
| | - A. Reich
- Center for Surgery and Public Health Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston MA United States
| | - A. Gupta
- Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston MA United States
| | - S. Perez
- Center for Surgery and Public Health Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston MA United States
| | | | - P. Gazarian
- Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston MA United States
| | - J. Tjia
- University of Massachusetts Medical Center Worcester MA United States
| | - S. Halpern
- University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA United States
| | - J. Weissman
- Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA United States
| | - K. Ladin
- Tufts University Medford MA United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ladin K, Pandya R, Weiner D, Meyer K, Perrone R, Wong J. DIALYSIS DECISION-MAKING WITH ELDERLY PATIENTS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF NEPHROLOGISTS. Innov Aging 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igy023.1158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
4
|
Affiliation(s)
- K Ladin
- Tufts University, Medford, MA
| | - D W Hanto
- St. Louis Veteran's Administration Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ladin K, Zhang G, Hanto DW. Geographic Disparities in Liver Availability: Accidents of Geography, or Consequences of Poor Social Policy? Am J Transplant 2017; 17:2277-2284. [PMID: 28390101 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2017] [Revised: 03/31/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Recently, a redistricting proposal intended to equalize Model for End-stage Liver Disease score at transplant recommended expanding liver sharing to mitigate geographic variation in liver transplantation. Yet, it is unclear whether variation in liver availability is arbitrary and a disparity requiring rectification or reflects differences in access to care. We evaluate the proposal's claim that organ supply is an "accident of geography" by examining the relationship between local organ supply and the uneven landscape of social determinants and policies that contribute to differential death rates across the United States. We show that higher mortality leading to greater availability of organs may in part result from disproportionate risks incurred at the local level. Disparities in public safety laws, health care infrastructure, and public funding may influence the risk of death and subsequent availability of deceased donors. These risk factors are disproportionately prevalent in regions with high organ supply. Policies calling for organ redistribution from high-supply to low-supply regions may exacerbate existing social and health inequalities by redistributing the single benefit (greater organ availability) of greater exposure to environmental and contextual risks (e.g. violent death, healthcare scarcity). Variation in liver availability may not be an "accident of geography" but rather a byproduct of disadvantage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Ladin
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Tufts University, Medford, MA.,Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.,Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab), Medford, MA
| | - G Zhang
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.,Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab), Medford, MA
| | - D W Hanto
- Vanderbilt Transplant Center and Department of Surgery, Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mittelman M, Thiessen C, Chon WJ, Clayville K, Cronin DC, Fisher JS, Fry-Revere S, Gross JA, Hanneman J, Henderson ML, Ladin K, Mysel H, Sherman LA, Willock L, Gordon EJ. Miscommunicating NOTA Can Be Costly to Living Donors. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:578-580. [PMID: 27599256 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- M Mittelman
- American Living Organ Donor Network, Philadelphia, PA
| | - C Thiessen
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - W J Chon
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - K Clayville
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - D C Cronin
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - J S Fisher
- Scripps Clinic/Green Hospital, La Jolla, CA
| | - S Fry-Revere
- American Living Organ Donor Network, Center for Ethical Solutions, Washington, DC
| | | | - J Hanneman
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | | | - K Ladin
- Tufts University, Boston, MA
| | - H Mysel
- Living Kidney Donor Network, Winnetka, IL
| | - L A Sherman
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - L Willock
- Biomedical Institutional Review Board, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - E J Gordon
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fisher JS, Butt Z, Friedewald J, Fry-Revere S, Hanneman J, Henderson ML, Ladin K, Mysel H, Preczewski L, Sherman LA, Thiessen C, Gordon EJ. Between Scylla and Charybdis: charting an ethical course for research into financial incentives for living kidney donation. Am J Transplant 2015; 15:1180-6. [PMID: 25833728 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2014] [Revised: 12/15/2014] [Accepted: 12/25/2015] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
New approaches to address the kidney scarcity in the United States are urgently needed. The greatest potential source of kidneys is from living donors. Proposals to offer financial incentives to increase living kidney donation rates remain highly controversial. Despite repeated calls for a pilot study to assess the impact of financial compensation on living kidney donation rates, many fear that financial incentives will exploit vulnerable individuals and cast the field of transplantation in a negative public light, ultimately reducing donation rates. This paper provides an ethical justification for conducting a pilot study of a federally regulated approach to providing financial incentives to living kidney donors, with the goal of assessing donors' perceptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S Fisher
- Scripps Center for Organ and Cell Transplantation, Scripps Clinic/Green Hospital, La Jolla, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Maibach EW, Maxfield A, Ladin K, Slater M. Translating health psychology into effective health communication: the american healthstyles audience segmentation project. J Health Psychol 2012; 1:261-77. [PMID: 22011991 DOI: 10.1177/135910539600100302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
This article presents a health lifestyle audience segmentation analysis based primarily on social cognitive theory. Two linked mail surveys were conducted among a representative group of US adults (N = 2967). Segmentation variables included data on five health behaviors (smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, nutrition and weight control), internal personal and social/ environmental variables associated with each of the health behaviors, as well as health value, sensation- seeking, life satisfaction and age. K-means classification analysis was employed; seven health lifestyles were identified. The majority of the health lifestyles are reliable, and as a whole, all demonstrate both discriminative, construct and predictive validity. The health-lifestyle audience segments are briefly profiled, and an argument is made that health- lifestyle segmentation, more than demographic or behavioral segmentation alone, can advance the goals of public health communication.
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
Rodrigue JR, Ladin K, Pavlakis M, Mandelbrot DA. Disclosing recipient information to potential living donors: preferences of donors and recipients, before and after surgery. Am J Transplant 2011; 11:1270-8. [PMID: 21645257 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03580.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Consensus guidelines, while recommending that potential living donors should be given information that could impact their donation decision, are nonspecific about the types of information that should be disclosed. We surveyed potential (n = 36) and past (n = 45) living donors and transplant candidates (n = 45) and recipients (n = 45) about their preferences for sharing or knowing specific information about the recipient, how this information would impact decision-making, and who should be responsible for disclosing information. Potential donors were less likely than all others to feel that recipient information should be disclosed to potential donors. Donors and recipients felt most strongly about disclosing if the recipient lost a previously transplanted kidney due to medication nonadherence as well as the likelihood of 1- and 5-year graft survival. Most donors would be less likely to pursue donation if the recipient lost a previously transplanted kidney due to medication nonadherence or generally had problems with taking medications as prescribed. Transplant programs should consider how to best balance the potential donor's right to receive information that could reasonably be expected to affect their decision-making process with the recipient's right to privacy and confidentiality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J R Rodrigue
- Center for Transplant Outcomes and Quality Improvement, The Transplant Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Although the National Organ Transplant Act calls for equity in access to transplantation, scarcity and racial disparities persist. To date, even the most comprehensive models have been unable to adequately explain these racial disparities, leaving policymakers unsure how best to intervene. Previous individual-level analyses, which have implicated risk factors such as race, financial status, cultural beliefs, unemployment, lack of commitment to surgery and lack of continuous access to care, overlook contextual and social network exposures. Social networks present a compelling way to examine cumulative risk clustered across individuals. Social networks have been shown to influence health outcomes and health behaviors through various pathways, including shared social capital, engaging in similar or group risky behaviors, diffusion of information and adopting or propagating social norms. Precursors to chronic kidney disease, including obesity, have been shown to spread through social networks. Social network analysis can reveal shared risks between potential donors and recipients in a given network, clarifying the likelihood of finding an appropriate match through either direct donation or paired exchanges. This paper presents a novel application of social network analysis to transplantation, illustrating implications for disparities and future clinical interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Ladin
- Transplant Institute and Center for Transplant Outcomes and Quality Improvement at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|