Defining the Transcriptional Landscapes of the Tumor Microenvironment of Cervical and Vaginal Cancers at Single-Cell Resolution

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Malignancies found within vaginal tissue are often diagnosed as cancers of the cervix, vulva, or urethra and are clinically treated with similar modalities. However, the rarity of vaginal cancer may be an artifice of categorization; current treatment paradigms do not take into account tissue-specific mutations and differences in mechanistic pathways intracellularly. Understanding the shared and distinctly different transcriptional profiles of vaginal and cervical tumors at a single-cell resolution will provide insights in vaginal tumor biology and will open avenues for future clinical interventions.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Biopsies of tumor and adjacent normal tissue from 9 patients (3 adenocarcinomas (ADC), 3 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) from the cervix, and 3 vaginal SCC) were collected and analyzed by single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to compare the tumor, immune, and stromal features of cervical and vaginal cancers.

RESULTS

Collectively, over 50,000 cells were analyzed by scRNA-seq in this study. We performed dimensionality reduction and clustering analysis of the single-cell transcriptomes to identify the major cell types composing the vaginal and cervical tumor tissues. Compared to Cervical SCC, Vaginal SCC tissues showed reduced fractions of macrophages (-2.7 log2-fold; padj < 0.02) and T cells (-3.7 log2-fold; padj < 0.02) by differential cell proportion analysis (RAISIN). Likewise, the vaginal SCC epithelial cell compartments showed downregulation of inflammatory pathways including TNF signaling via NFKB (NES = -5.7, padj = 5.0 × 10-19), IL2 STAT5 signaling (NES = -4.5, padj = 1.6 × 10-12), and interferon gamma response (NES = -4.3, padj = 9.4 × 10-12), among the Hallmark pathway collection. On the other hand, vaginal SCC epithelial cells showed significant upregulation of oxidative phosphorylation (NES = 4.8, padj = 1.7 × 10-17), p53 pathway (NES = 4.2, padj = 1.8 × 10-13), mTORC1 signaling (NES = 4.2, padj = 1.9 × 10-13), and estrogen early and late response (NES = 4.0, padj < 7.5 × 10-12) compared to cervical SCC.

CONCLUSION

These results highlight distinct differences in the cell type composition and cancer epithelial pathways in vaginal vs. cervical SCC. Among upregulated pathways in vaginal SCC, ER and mTORC1 pathway activation may represent targets for therapeutic intervention worthy of further investigation.

Improving Cancer Care by Incorporating the Patient's Voice in Symptom Management (IMPROVE): A Multicenter-Prospective Pilot Study

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

IMPROVE is a prospective multicenter pilot study. It evaluates whether routine physician review of patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) during radiotherapy alters physicians' perception of cancer patients' treatment-related toxicity and influences symptom management.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We are enrolling patients with thoracic or gastrointestinal cancers amenable to conventional-fractionated radiotherapy. Patients may receive concurrent chemotherapy. Patients report (1) symptoms, using PRO-CTCAE measures, (2) the most burdensome symptom, and (3) how symptoms interfere with daily activities. Patients complete the measures before seeing their physician during each on-treatment visit. During weekly visits and before reviewing the patient's PROMs, physicians rate the symptom burden for each patient from 0 to 10, using available clinical data. These data include vital signs, lab work, physical exams, nursing assessments, and physicians' clinical judgment. After reviewing the patients' PROMs, physicians re-rate each patient's symptom burden and report any changes in recommended interventions. Changes could include (1) additional counseling, (2) new medications or interventions, (3) referrals to other services, or (4) further testing or evaluation. After each patient's course of radiotherapy, providers complete a Clinician Feedback Form about the impact of PROM review on symptom perception and management during treatment. This study commenced November 11, 2020 at a multi-site tertiary academic cancer center (using electronic or paper questionnaires) and July 21, 2021 at a multi-site community cancer center (using paper forms).

RESULTS

To be determined.

CONCLUSION

To be determined.

POS0057 INDUCIBLE REGULATORY SYNOVIAL MACROPHAGES: A PROOF-OF-CONCEPT STUDY FOR A CELL-BASED TARGETED THERAPY FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background

Infiltration of monocyte-derived macrophages into the synovial tissue (ST) is a hallmark of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pathology. These macrophages promote inflammation, local joint effusion, and joint damage via the release of cytokines, oxygen reactive species, and tissue damaging enzymes. However, balancing these, are the ‘regulatory’ macrophages with inflammation-resolving properties, characterised by expression of CD206 and MerTK, dominant within the ST of healthy individuals as well as RA patients in remission (1). Indeed, these cells are believed to actively contribute to the maintenance of remission.

Macrophages are known to exhibit remarkable phenotypic plasticity and understanding the role of this characteristic in regulating inflammation and pathology remains a major challenge, as does the characterization of factors in the microenvironment such as the synovium that control such macrophage characteristics. Importantly, whether the infiltrating, inflammatory macrophages of the RA ST similarly exhibit such phenotypic plasticity, and whether this occurs during the process of reaching remission, remains to be studied.

Objectives

We investigated the phenotypic plasticity of inflammatory synovial macrophages from patients with RA in vitro, investigating their ability to convert from an inflammatory macrophage population into ‘regulatory’ CD206+MerTK+ macrophages. These findings will provide a proof-of-concept as to the utility of these macrophage for a cell-based therapy in resolving inflammation in patients with RA, and will likely extend our understanding of the mechanisms of action of currently used therapeutics.

Methods

Synovial fluid (SF) mononuclear cells were obtained from patients with active early RA (<1 year; fulfilling 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria). Cryopreserved SFMCs were cultured for 48hr in the presence of 10 ng/mL interferon(IFN)γ, 50 ng/mL dexamethasone, 10 μg/mL Infliximab, or diluent. Following culture, cells were immunostained and analysed using a Beckman Coulter CytoFLEX flow cytometer and FlowJo software. SF macrophages were characterised by expression of CD14, CD45, CD68 (Figure 1A), and proportions of CD206+ MerTK+ macrophages measured.

Figure 1.

Synovial fluid CD68+macrophage plasticity in vitro. (A) Gating strategy depicting CD68+ CD45+CD14+ SF macrophage determination. (B) Proportions of CD206 and MerTK-expressing SF macrophages after 48hr culture in the presence of 10 ng/mL IFNγ, 50 ng/mL dexamethasone or 10 µg/mL Infliximab, or absence. Data are representative of 5 individual experiments. Data were analysed by two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, *p<0.05.

Results

Prior to culture, the CD68+ macrophage populations present in SF were found to be predominantly CD206-MerTK-. After 48 hours of culture, in the absence of any stimulus, there was an increase in proportions of CD206+MerTK+ macrophages. Treatment with either dexamethasone or anti-TNF (Infliximab) resulted in a further increase in proportions of CD206+ MerTK+, M2-like macrophages. In contrast, culture with IFNγ induced a reduction in this population. Importantly, we found that the generated CD206+MerTK+ macrophages were phenotypically stable in culture following removal of these differentiating agents.

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate that inflammatory SF cells are indeed able to polarise to regulatory, CD206+MerTK+ macrophages in vitro. The findings provide further mechanistic insights into the basis for the therapeutic benefits of glucocorticoids and TNF inhibitors, as well as providing initial proof-of-concept in the use of regulatory macrophages as a cellular-based therapy or therapeutic target for patients with RA.

References

[1]Alivernini S, MacDonald L, Elmesmari A, et al., Distinct synovial tissue macrophage subsets regulate inflammation and remission in rheumatoid arthritis. Nature Medicine. 2020;26(8):1295-306 10.1038/s41591-020-0939-8.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

What are the essential components of antenatal care? A systematic review of the literature and development of signal functions to guide monitoring and evaluation

BACKGROUND

Antenatal care (ANC) is one of the key care packages required to reduce global maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the essential components of ANC and develop signal functions.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MESH headings for databases including Cinahl, Cochrane, Global Health, Medline, PubMed and Web of Science.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Papers and reports on content of ANC published from 2000 to 2020.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Narrative synthesis of data and development of signal function through 7 consensus-building workshops with 184 stakeholders.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 221 papers and reports are included from which 28 essential components of ANC were extracted and used to develop 15 signal functions with the equipment, medication and consumables required for implementation of each. Signal functions for the prevention and management of infectious diseases (malaria, HIV, tuberculosis, syphilis and tetanus) can be applied depending on population disease burden. Screening and management of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, anaemia, mental and social health (including intimate partner violence) are recommended universally. Three signal functions address monitoring of fetal growth and wellbeing, and identification and management of obstetric complications. Promotion of health and wellbeing via education and support for nutrition, cessation of substance abuse, uptake of family planning, recognition of danger signs and birth preparedness are included as essential components of ANC.

CONCLUSIONS

New signal functions have been developed which can be used for monitoring and evaluation of content and quality of ANC. Country adaptation and validation is recommended.

A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Describing the Prevalence of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF Gene Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Background

Tumors of the metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients that are wildtype (WT) for KRAS or NRAS mutations respond more favorably to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatments. Treatment guidelines now recommend that all mCRC patients have WT KRAS and NRAS tumor status confirmed prior to initiating anti-EGFR therapy. Evidence also suggests that BRAF mutations may predict lack of response to anti-EGFR therapy. As such, there is now a need for comprehensive data on the prevalence of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations among patients with mCRC.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted among studies that described the prevalence of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF gene mutations in mCRC patients. Observational cohort studies and standard of care arm of randomized clinical trials were included. Random effects meta-analysis models were used to create summary prevalence estimates for each of the mutation types. Subgroup analyses were also conducted to identify potential sources of heterogeneity. Exploratory analyses of overall and progression-free survival by mutation status were also conducted.

Results

This systematic review and meta-analysis included 275 studies comprising 77,104 mCRC patients. The summary prevalence estimate was 35.9% for KRAS mutations, 7.1% for BRAF mutations, and 4.1% for NRAS mutations. Female patients had significantly more KRAS and BRAF mutations than males, and significant variation by study location was observed for both KRAS and BRAF mutation prevalence. Overall survival was significantly decreased for patients with KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS mutations compared to those with WT tumors. Progression-free survival was also significantly decreased among patients with KRAS and BRAF mutations.

Conclusions

KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutation statuses in patients with mCRC are important predictors of treatment success and may also have prognostic value. In this paper we present the first systematic and comprehensive literature review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS mutations and demonstrate the prognostic impact of mutation status on survival.

Management of EGFR Inhibitor-induced Skin Toxicity and Factors Impacting Patients' Adherence to Skin Toxicity Treatment: Health Care Provider and Patient Surveys in European Oncology Centers

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to provide a description of existing measures for the prevention and management of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor monoclonal antibody-induced skin toxicities and factors impacting patients' adherence to those measures in France, Germany, and Spain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study consisted of 2 separate surveys. Health care professionals (HCPs; oncologists and nurses) in France, Germany, and Spain were interviewed, and patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and head-and-neck cancer in France and Germany self-completed questionnaires. The study was conducted between February and July 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 53 oncologists, 44 nurses, and 143 patients participated in the study. HCPs stated that skin toxicities moderately (52%) or severely (28%) impacted patient care. Ninety percent of HCPs reported routine provision of prophylactic measures. The great majority of patients self-reported adherence with the prophylactic (80% to 88% depending on the type of measures) and reactive (93% to drug prescription) skin toxicity recommendations. HCPs estimated patient adherence to be 45% for full adherence and 40% for partial adherence. Most HCPs reported a positive or very positive impact of preventive measures and recommendations on skin toxicity incidence and severity, patients' quality of life, and various aspects of quality of anti-cancer treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin toxicities are an important adversity negatively impacting on patient care. However, despite the positive perception of the effectiveness of skin toxicity prophylaxis, almost one-third of oncology centers did not provide formal guidelines, and 10% of HCPs did not provide routine prophylactic measures. Patient adherence appears to be high for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor monoclonal antibody-induced skin toxicity prevention measures.

Evolution of RAS testing over time: factors influencing mutation rates in metastatic colorectal cancer patients

Aim: Correct identification of RAS gene variants is key for targeted treatment decisions in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Published RAS mutation rates differ and could be influenced by several factors including testing methods. This study aimed to describe the performance of laboratories to correctly identify RAS variants over time and to understand how RAS testing has evolved in Europe. Materials & methods: Misclassification and test failure rates were calculated and related to the used test methodology for 239 unique laboratories participating in external quality assessment for metastatic colorectal cancer between 2013 and 2018. In addition, 33 laboratories completed a survey aiming to obtain more details on their routine testing strategies, number of samples analyzed and RAS mutation rates between 2013 and 2017. Results: The mutation status was correctly analyzed in 96.1% (N = 5471) RAS and BRAF tests. A total of 4.6% (N = 2860) RAS tests included false-negative results. In 1.6% (N = 5562) RAS and BRAF tests, an analysis failure occurred. Misclassifications and technical failures both decreased between 2013 and 2018. The number of next-generation sequencing users increased from 6.9% (N = 130) in 2013 to 44.6% (N = 112) in 2018. Over time, more codons were included in the methodologies, yet 23.2% (N = 112) did not offer full RAS testing (exon 2, 3, 4) in 2018. Based on the survey the overall RAS mutation rate was estimated as 45.2% (N = 27,325). Conclusion: This is the largest observational study reporting RAS mutation rates to-date. There was no trend of RAS mutation rates over time despite having a clear shift to more sensitive tests and increased quality of testing.

Feeding forage or concentrates early in life influences rumen fermentation, metabolic response, immune function and growth of Wagyu × Friesian calves

Context Early life nutrition of calves influences their performance later in life. There is limited literature demonstrating the effects of rearing dairy calves in early life on milk with either exclusively forage or concentrate starter diets on metabolic and immune function and post-weaning growth and body composition on a pasture only diet. Aim This study evaluated the effects of feeding Wagyu × Holstein Friesian calves a forage starter (FS) or a concentrate starter (CS) for the first 14 weeks of rearing on rumen fermentation, blood metabolites, immune function, growth and body composition to Week 41. Methods Group-housed calves (Wagyu × Friesian, 10 calves per group, three groups per treatment) were fed milk (2 L per calf twice daily) until Week 7, then transitioned to once a day milk feeding until weaning by Week 9, with ad libitum access to either FS or CS. All calves were transferred to graze ryegrass pastures a week after transitioning to once daily milk feeding, with starter feeds removed gradually by Week 14. Thereafter, calves were reared together on pasture until Week 41. Results Solid feed intake was lower in FS than CS calves during the first 7 weeks. Total short chain fatty acids were lower, but acetate to propionate ratio and rumen pH were higher in FS than CS calves at Week 7, with no differences observed at Week 12 or 30. Plasma β-hydroxybutyrate an indicator of ketogenic ability of the rumen in developing calves was higher in FS vs CS calves at weaning. Further, FS calves had lower concentrations of circulating non-esterified fatty acids compared with CS calves at weaning. Compared with CS calves, FS calves grew slower for the first 14 weeks which was associated with lower plasma IGF-1 levels. However, FS calves had greater average daily gain after 14 weeks when on pasture and had similar plasma IGF-1 at 30 weeks and similar body weight and body composition (muscle and subcutaneous fat deposition) by Week 41 compared to CS calves. Conclusions These results indicate that offering a FS starter has better prepared calves for weaning onto pasture and potentially improved utilisation of forage post-weaning to achieve similar muscle and fat deposition and overall liveweight in both groups by 41 weeks. Implications Dairy beef calves can be successfully reared using forage as the only solid feed source without affecting their growth performance on pasture until 10 months of age. Rearing calves using forage will contribute to reducing the usage of concentrate feeds in pastoral dairy-beef production systems and provide an opportunity to fulfil the market requirements and standards for grain-free beef production.

The incidence of infusion reactions associated with monoclonal antibody drugs targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of patient and study characteristics

Background

Systemic cancer therapies may induce infusion reactions (IRs) or hypersensitivities. Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with anti‐EGFR therapies, including cetuximab and panitumumab, may be subject to these reactions. We conducted a meta‐analysis to estimate the IR incidence in this population and identify variations in this incidence by patient or study characteristics.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted to identify observational studies or clinical trials of mCRC patients treated with anti‐EGFR therapies that reported occurrences of IRs, hypersensitivity, or allergy/anaphylaxis. The objective of the study was to estimate the incidence of IRs. Random effects models were used to meta‐analyze the incidence of IRs overall and stratified by therapy type, study design, geographic location, RAS or KRAS mutation status, grade of reaction severity, and terminology used to describe the reaction.

Results

The pooled estimate for IR incidence was 4.9% (95% confidence interval: 3.6%‐6.5%). Lower‐grade reactions were more common than higher‐grade reactions overall and the incidence of reactions among cetuximab patients was nearly four times that of panitumumab patients (6.1% vs 1.6%).

Conclusions

IRs occur in approximately 5% of mCRC patients treated with anti‐EGFR therapies, and the incidence varies significantly by grade of severity and therapy type. Studies evaluating these outcomes should consider investigating survival outcomes by IR status to determine its prognostic relevance.

An evaluation of RAS testing and survival among mCRC patients in the United States

e15144

Background: The status of mutations in the rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog ( RAS) family of genes, which includes Kirsten RAS ( KRAS) and Neuroblastoma RAS ( NRAS) predicts response to anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Current treatment guidelines recommend all mCRC patients to receive RAS testing prior to initiating treatment with an anti-EGFR agent. This study sought to establish estimates of RAS testing among mCRC patients in the US prior to initiation of first and third lines of treatment, and to describe median survival by treatment groups. Methods: Data from the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records (OSCER) 2.0 dataset were utilized. Patients diagnosed with mCRC between January 1, 2011 and July 31, 2017 were eligible. Patients were followed for up to 1 year, or until death, following their mCRC diagnosis. Results: A total of 17,387 mCRC patients were included in the analysis, among which 69% were RAS tested and 31% were never tested. Among the RAS tested patients, 23% were tested prior to their mCRC diagnosis 60% received RAS testing following mCRC diagnosis but prior to first line of treatment, 3% were tested following first line treatment but prior to third line, and the remaining 14% were tested following third line. Demographic variables did not differ between tested and untested groups, overall and by line of treatment. The overall median survival of RAS WT patients was 31.1 months (95% CI: 30.0, 32.4). MCRC patients who were not RAS tested had a lower median survival of 20.7 months (95% CI: 19.1, 22.5). Conclusions: The timing of when patients are being tested varies greatly. While nearly 70% of patients had a RAS test, approximately 30% failed to be tested, identifying a large gap in testing practices. Universal RAS testing provides patients and their physicians with knowledge of their anti-EGFR treatment options and may result in improved survival.

Effect of weaning age on growth, mammary gland development, and immune function in Holstein Friesian calves fed conserved alfalfa (FiberStart)

This study aimed to evaluate intake, body growth, and the development of the rumen, mammary gland, and immune system in Holstein Friesian calves reared for 100 d on the commercially available feed FiberStart (conserved alfalfa, Medicago sativa; Fiber Fresh Feeds Ltd., Reporoa, New Zealand) and fed calf milk replacer (CMR) for either 56 or 91 d. Eighty calves (40 bulls and 40 heifer calves) were reared indoors in groups (n = 5 of the same sex/pen). All calves were fed 4 L of CMR/d (175 g/L of CMR) in 2 feeds/d for the first 10 d and then 1 feed/d until d 49 or 84. The calves were gradually weaned by d 56 (earlier weaned; n = 8 pens) and d 91 (later weaned; n = 8 pens). All calves were fed FiberStart ad libitum as the only solid feed source from d 1 to 100 of the study. Irrespective of treatment, all calves had similar body weights at d 0 (40.9 ± 3.0 kg) and d 49 (74.2 ± 5.1 kg) of the study. Calf sex had no effect on intake, growth, blood, and immune system parameters. Earlier-weaned calves consumed 18% more solid feed dry matter but had 16% lower body weight gain (28.9 vs. 38.5 kg, respectively) from d 56 to 100 relative to later-weaned calves, resulting in different body weight at 100 d (104 vs. 121 ± 1.3 kg). Although earlier-weaned calves could compensate for the loss of CMR dry matter and crude protein intake from d 56 to 100 by increasing forage intake, they were unable to compensate for the loss of energy from the CMR by increasing solid feed consumption. Plasma β-hydroxybutyrate concentrations were 52% greater in earlier-weaned calves than in later-weaned calves at d 84, indicating greater metabolic activity of the rumen wall. The duration of CMR feeding had no influence on humoral or cell-mediated immune functions of the calves, as evidenced by a lack of effect on antivaccine antibody responses as well as on immune gene expression. Earlier- versus later-weaned heifer calves had 5% lower mammary gland mass, indicating that greater energy supply increased mammary mass. The results of this experiment demonstrate the ability to artificially rear dairy calves on a conserved alfalfa as the only solid feed. Furthermore, earlier weaning off CMR promotes solid feed intake and an associated increase in blood β-hydroxybutyrate, an indicator of rumen development, but increasing the duration of CMR feeding improves growth and mammary gland mass by d 100. The implications of these findings on lifetime growth, health, and milk production in dairy heifers warrant further investigation.

Vitamin D Supplementation to Treat Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms: A Review

For the past 15 years, cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been the leading cause of death for both men and women in the United States and worldwide. With an aging population, there has been increasing use of statin therapy to reduce the risk of CVD. However, statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) remain an obstacle to this treatment, leading to discontinuation and nonadherence to statin therapy. Signs and symptoms of SAMS include muscle pain, tenderness, and increased serum creatine kinase. Despite the idiopathic pathophysiology of SAMS, some studies have shown an association between vitamin D deficiency and SAMS; the use of vitamin D supplements can lead to relief of these symptoms. The purpose of this review was to critique evidence for the association between low serum vitamin D and SAMS and the use of vitamin D supplementation for treatment.

Vitamin D Supplementation to Treat Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms: A Review

For the past 15 years, cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been the leading cause of death for both men and women in the United States and worldwide. With an aging population, there has been increasing use of statin therapy to reduce the risk of CVD. However, statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) remain an obstacle to this treatment, leading to discontinuation and nonadherence to statin therapy. Signs and symptoms of SAMS include muscle pain, tenderness, and increased serum creatine kinase. Despite the idiopathic pathophysiology of SAMS, some studies have shown an association between vitamin D deficiency and SAMS; the use of vitamin D supplements can lead to relief of these symptoms. The purpose of this review was to critique evidence for the association between low serum vitamin D and SAMS and the use of vitamin D supplementation for treatment.

European follow-up of incorrect biomarker results for colorectal cancer demonstrates the importance of quality improvement projects

Biomarker analysis for colorectal cancer has been shown to be reliable in Europe with 97% of samples tested by EQA participants to be correctly classified. This study focuses on errors during the annual EQA assessment. The aim was to explore the causes and actions related to the observed errors and to provide feedback and assess any improvement between 2016 and 2017. An electronic survey was sent to all laboratories with minimum one genotyping error or technical failure on ten tumor samples. A workshop was organized based on 2016 survey responses. Improvement of performance in 2017 was assessed for returning participants (n = 76), survey respondents (n = 13) and workshop participants (n = 4). Survey respondents and workshop participants improved in terms of (maximum) analysis score, successful participation, and genotyping errors compared to all returning participants. In 2016, mostly pre- and post-analytical errors (both 25%) were observed caused by unsuitability of the tumor tissue for molecular analysis. In 2017, most errors were due to analytical problems (50.0%) caused by methodological problems. The most common actions taken (n = 58) were protocol revisions (34.5%) and staff training (15.5%). In 24.1% of issues identified no action was performed. Corrective actions were linked to an improved performance, especially if performed by the pathologist. Although biomarker testing has improved over time, error occurrence at different phases stresses the need for quality improvement throughout the test process. Participation to quality improvement projects and a close collaboration with the pathologist can have a positive influence on performance.

Prevalence of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF gene mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

523

Background: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted to summarize the prevalence of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in mCRC patients. These mutations have substantial implications for treatment decisions among mCRC patients. Methods: Multiple databases were searched to identify observational studies and clinical trials (standard of care arms only) that reported mutation status among mCRC patients. Random effects meta-analysis models were used to estimate summary prevalence estimates for each of the mutations. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify potential sources of heterogeneity in mutation prevalence. Results: The meta-analyses included 275 studies comprising over 77,000 mCRC patients. The summary prevalence estimate was 35.9% for KRAS mutations, 7.1% for BRAF mutations, and 4.1% for NRAS mutations. Female patients had significantly more KRAS and BRAF mutations than males ( KRAS: 42.2% vs. 37.3%, p = 0.011; BRAF: 11.0% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.018), and significant variation by study location was observed for both KRAS (p = 0.025) and BRAF (p = 0.002) mutation prevalence. Conclusions: The prevalence of KRAS, BRAF, or NRAS mutations in mCRC patients varies significantly by gender and study location. compared to patients with wild-type tumors. The results of these analyses are informative for clinicians, patients, and researchers.

The incidence of infusion reactions associated with monoclonal antibody drugs targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

526

Background: Infusion reactions have been reported in studies of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with anti-EGFR therapies, including cetuximab and panitumumab, with incidences ranging from 0-33%. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted to estimate the incidence of infusion reactions in this population and identify variations in this incidence by patient and study characteristics. Methods: Multiple scientific databases were searched to identify observational studies or clinical trials of mCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR therapies that reported rates of infusion reactions, hypersensitivity, or allergy/anaphylaxis. Random effects models were used to meta-analyze the incidence of infusion reactions overall and stratified by therapy, study design, geographic location, KRAS mutation status, and grade of reaction severity. Results: Among 48 studies included in this meta-analysis, the pooled estimate for infusion reaction incidence was 0.049 (95% CI: 0.036 – 0.065), or nearly 5%. Reactions of grades 1 or 2 were more common than reactions of grades 3-5 (0.089 vs. 0.028) No significant variations in infusion reaction incidence were observed by study design, KRAS status, or study location. Conclusions: Infusion reactions occur in approximately 5% of mCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR therapies and the incidence varies significantly by grade and severity. Future studies should consider investigating survival outcomes for only those patients with infusion reactions to determine its prognostic relevance.

An assessment of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF testing prior to 1st line of therapy among mCRC patients treated at community cancer centers in the United States

678

Background: We sought to determine the proportion of patients with mCRC in the United States who were tested for KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutational status before any 1st line of therapy. Patient demographics that may influence testing, and the turnaround time between key events associated with biomarker testing and utilization of biomarker results were also assessed. Methods: The study utilized the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records (OSCER) 2.0 dataset, provided by Flatiron Health, which includes mCRC patients from community cancer centers across the United States. Biomarker results are recorded in the Flatiron Electronic Health Record when available. The proportion of patients tested or not tested for KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutational status before 1st line of therapy between 2013 and 2017 was calculated, as were the differences in the patient demographics. The median number of days between the date of tissue collection, the date the tissue was received by the laboratory, and the date the oncologist received the test results was calculated. Results: Of the 13,437 patients included in the analysis, the proportion of patients who were tested prior to 1st line of therapy was as follows: KRAS, 30.8%,; NRAS, 9.9%; BRAF, 11.5%. Age, insurance type, race, and presence of liver metastases were all statistically significant factors that influenced testing. Specifically, younger, commercially-insured, Caucasian patients, and those who had liver metastases were more likely to be tested. For KRAS testing, the median time between tissue collection and tissue received by the laboratory was 26 days. Receipt of the results by the oncologist took an additional median number of 27 days. Conclusions: This study found that the testing rate for these key mCRC biomarkers was less than 31% and that the median number of days to assess biomarker results was 26. Further studies conducted in various settings, such as academic cancer clinics, are needed to investigate this low proportion of testing and long time to assess results.

Prevalence of RAS and BRAF mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients by tumor location

681

Background: There is evidence to suggest that tumor biology and pathology differ for right- and left-sided colon tumors which may affect treatment efficacy and clinical outcomes. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available scientific literature to summarize the prevalence of RAS and BRAF mutations by primary tumor location and to identify potential sources of heterogeneity in mutation prevalence. Methods: This study was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Using comprehensive search strings, several medical research databases were queried and relevant variables abstracted including tumor mutation prevalence, study country, metastasis site, tissue source, study design, study dates, median age of the cohort, mutation assessment method, and length of follow-up. Results: Final abstraction was performed on 40 articles, 36 observational studies and 4 randomized trials. Most studies were from Europe (n = 16), followed by Asia (n = 11), USA, (n = 7), Australia (n = 3), and the remaining 3 were conducted in multiple countries. The proportion of males in each study ranged from 37% to 72%, and the mean age ranged from 55 to 76 years. The prevalence of all RAS mutations was significantly higher among right-sided colon tumors than left-sided colon tumors (44%, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 38 – 50% vs 34%, 95% CI: 29 – 38%; p = 0.009). BRAF mutation prevalence was also higher in right-sided tumors (16.1%, 95% CI: 13.1 – 19.6% vs 4.4%, 95% CI: 3.4 – 5.8%; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that mutation prevalence varied by primary tumor right- or left-sided location among mCRC patients. Some of this variation may be explained by study characteristics such as mutation assessment method, country and length of follow-up. Further research will help to better understand treatment and outcome implications of tumor sidedness and mutation prevalence.

Neuroleptic prescribing in an adolescent psychiatric in-patient unit

The Royal College of Psychiatrists' consensus statement suggests that prescribing high dose antipsychotic medication in children and adolescents should rarely be necessary. Our objective was to study the prescribing of antipsychotic medication in a regional adolescent unit during a three-year period. We found that antipsychotic prescribing on this unit is common in psychotic disorders and often high closes are required. This is not in keeping with the recommendations of the consensus statement. Review of clinical practice on other adolescent units is needed, together with a more comprehensive evaluation of the outcome of psychotic disorders in this age group.

Regional and practice setting differences in the management of EGFR rash among mCRC patients treated with panitumumab: Results of a national survey in the United States

e15170

Background: Skin toxicity can be a limiting factor for the use of anti-EGFR therapies, such as panitumumab, and there are currently no standard practice guidelines for rash management in the United States (U.S.). This study aimed to evaluate if there were regional or practice setting differences in strategies used among oncologists to manage EGFR rash, including utilization of dermatologic and nursing support. Methods: 250 practicing oncologists who had treated at least three mCRC patients with panitumumab in the last year completed an online survey to report their opinions and perceptions regarding skin toxicity management strategies. Participants reported if they were affiliated with an academic/university or a community-based practice. Participants were stratified into years of practice post-fellowship ( < 10 and > 10 years) and geographic region of primary practice (West, Midwest, Northeast, Southern U.S.). Results: Oncologists surveyed did not consistently utilize dermatology support. 40% (n = 99) of practicing oncologists surveyed reported consulting a dermatologist “occasionally.” Less than 5% reported “always” consulting dermatology and 6% reported “never” utilizing dermatology support. Utilization of dermatology support varied significantly by region. In the Southern US more oncologists reported “never” consulting dermatology while in the Midwest more oncologists reported “always” utilizing dermatology support (p = 0.05). While dermatology was inconsistently utilized, oncologists frequently utilized nursing support to minimize and manage anti-EGFR skin toxicity. 73% (n = 182) of oncologists engaged nursing support to “monitor skin toxicity during treatment” and 70% (n = 175) of oncologists had nursing support to “educate on skin toxicity prior to starting treatment.” Conclusions: While nursing support is consistently utilized by oncologists in the management of EGFR rash in mCRC patients treated with panitumumab, use of dermatology support was inconsistent and varied significantly by region. This lack of consistency in toxicity management strategies highlights the need for increased physician education.

Trends in biomarker testing among metastatic colorectal cancer patients: A temporal description of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF testing in the EU5

e15136

Background: The European Medicines Agency (EMA) changed its indication language from wild-type KRAS to wild-type RAS ( KRAS and NRAS) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with panitumumab in July 2013. The objective of this study was to describe patterns of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF testing among mCRC patients in the EU5 (United Kingdom (U.K.), Germany, France, Italy and Spain) and to evaluate if there were demographic or clinical differences in the patients who were/were not tested. Methods: This descriptive study utilized a serial physician survey from Oncology Analyzer data (IMS Health Oncology, Fairfield, CT, USA), which provides real-world epidemiologic and clinical data. Trends in biomarker testing were evaluated by calculating the proportion of patients who were /were not tested for combinations of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF within each of the five countries. KRAS and BRAF data were available in all countries from quarter three (Q3) 2012 to quarter two (Q2) 2015. NRAS was available in all countries from quarter 1 (Q1) 2014 to Q2 2015. Frequencies and proportions were also calculated to summarize patient demographic and clinical characteristics between groups with different testing choices. Results: The study included 32,961 mCRC patients. Prior to July 2013, most patients were tested for only KRAS. The proportions of patients tested for both KRAS and NRAS increased substantially during the period of data availability for NRAS, including < 1% to 19.1% in the U.K., 8.8% to 31.9% in France, 13.1% to 43.2% in Germany, 5.9% to 24.6% in Italy, and 8.7% to 31.4% in Spain. The proportions of patients tested for all three biomarkers also increased during the period of data availability for all three biomarkers (Q1 2014 to Q2 2015), including 2.3% to 16.4% in the U.K., 4.8% to 26.6% in France, < 1% to 2.4% in Germany, 4.2% to 22.3% in Italy, and 1.5% to 9.3% in Spain. There were few differences in patient demographic or clinical characteristics between those with different testing choices. Conclusions: This analysis provides a description of the patterns of biomarker testing using read-world data and suggests a consistent increase in testing among mCRC patients in the EU5.

Preemptive versus reactive management of EGFR rash among mCRC patients treated with panitumumab: Results of a national survey of treating oncologists in the United States

e15169

Background: The Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol with Panitumumab (STEPP) and the Japan Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol with Panitumumab (J-STEPP) were open-label, randomized trials that were designed to evaluate differences in preemptive versus reactive management of dermatologic toxicities associated with panitumumab among patients with mCRC. The objective of this study was to evaluate if there were differences in the knowledge and application of STEPP and J-STEPP among oncologists who self-identified as primarily managing EGFR rash preemptively or reactively. Methods: A total of 250 practicing oncologists who had treated at least three new or continuing mCRC patients with panitumumab in the last year completed an online survey to report their opinions and perceptions regarding the management strategies for mCRC patients who are treated with panitumumab. Preemptive treatment was described in the survey as beginning treatment “prior to the appearance of rash” and reactive treatment was defined as beginning treatment “after signs of rash.” Results: Of the 250 oncologists who participated in this study, n = 58 (23%) reported treating 100% of their patients preemptively and n = 38 (15%) reported treating 100% of their patients reactively. A significantly higher proportion of preemptive treaters than reactive treaters reported following the skin management strategies from STEPP or J-STEPP when managing panitumumab-related skin toxicity (31% vs 13%, p = 0.02). When asked if skin moisturizer, sunscreen, over-the-counter topical steroids, prescription topical steroids, oral antibiotics, topical antibiotics, or UV protective garments were most critical in the preemptive management of panitumumab-related skin toxicity, preemptive treaters more likely to report using oral antibiotics and reactive treaters more like to report using sunscreen (p = 0.05). Conclusions: The results of this survey highlight the wide variability in the management of EGFR-related rash among mCRC patients who are treated with panitumumab and they highlight the need for heighted education among oncologists who treat mCRC patients with panitumumab.

Milk production and composition, nitrogen utilization, and grazing behavior of late-lactation dairy cows as affected by time of allocation of a fresh strip of pasture

Eighty late-lactation dairy cows were used to examine the effects of allocating a new pasture strip of a sward based on ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) in the morning (a.m.; ∼0730 h) or in the afternoon (p.m.; ∼1530 h) on milk production and composition, nitrogen (N) utilization, and grazing behavior. Cows grazed the same pasture strips for 24 h and were offered the same daily herbage allowance. Herbage composition differed among treatments; p.m. herbage had greater dry matter (DM; 22.7 vs. 19.9%), organic matter (OM; 89.5 vs. 88.9%), and water-soluble carbohydrate (10.9 vs. 7.6%) concentrations and lesser crude protein (20.5 vs. 22.2%) and neutral detergent fiber (48.8 vs. 50.4%) concentrations compared with a.m. herbage. Total fatty acids (FA), α-linolenic acid, and polyunsaturated FA (PUFA) were greater in a.m. herbage, whereas monounsaturated FA were greater in p.m. herbage. Estimates of herbage DM intake did not differ among treatments. Daily milk yields and milk fat and milk protein concentrations were similar among treatments, whereas milk fat (684 vs. 627 g/cow), milk protein (545 vs. 505 g/cow), and milk solids (milk fat + milk protein) yields (1,228 vs. 1,132 g/cow) tended to be greater for cows on p.m. herbage. Rumenic acid and total PUFA in milk were greater for cows on a.m. herbage, whereas oleic acid was greater for cows on p.m. herbage. Estimates of urinary N excretion (g/d) did not differ among treatments, but urinary N concentrations were greater for cows on a.m. herbage (5.85 vs. 5.36 g/L). Initial herbage mass (HM) available (kg of DM/ha) and instantaneous HM disappearance rates (kg of DM/ha and kg of DM/h) did not differ, but fractional disappearance rates (0.56 vs. 0.74 per hour for a.m. vs. p.m., respectively) differed. Under the current conditions, timing of pasture strip allocation altered the herbage nutrient supply to cows; allocating a fresh strip of pasture later in the day resulted in moderate increases in milk and milk solids yields in late-lactation dairy cows. Conversely, a greater concentration of precursor FA in a.m. herbage resulted in a greater concentration of beneficial FA in milk, compared with cows on p.m. herbage.

The treatment continuum of panitumumab, cetuximab, and bevacizumab in 1st through 3rd line by KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutation status among mCRC patients treated at community cancer centers in the United States

638

Background: Our objective was to use real world data to evaluate of the treatment continuum of bevacizumab (Bmab), cetuximab (Cmab), panitumumab (Pmab) or no biologics across 1st, 2nd, and 3rd lines among metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who were treated at community cancer centers in the United States. This objective was applied separately to patients with confirmed KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF wild-type (WT) or mutation (MUT) status, as well as patient who did not receive biomarker testing (UNK). Methods: This descriptive study utilized data from the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records (OSCER) database. It included 5,446 (2,064 WT, 1,807 MUT, and 1,575 UNK) patients diagnosed with mCRC between 1/1/2011 and 8/31/2015. Patients were stratified into the following mutually-exclusive categories in 1st, 2nd line, and 3rd line: Pmab only, Cmab only, Bmab only, or no biologic. Patients who survived and continued therapy were followed through the lines of therapy. Results: 23.8% of WT, 36.3% of MUT and 49.5% of UNK patients did not receive a biologic in 1st line. There were 1,003 WT patients who were treated with Bmab in 1st. Of those, n=587 (58.5%) survived and elected to continue treatment in 2nd line as follows: n=221 (37.6%) continued with Bmab, n=216 (36.8%) initiated Cmab, n=65 (11.1%) initiated Pmab, and n=85 (14.5%) received no biologic in 2nd line. Of the 221 WT patients who received Bmab in 1st and 2nd line, n=129 (58.4%) survived and initiated 3rd line treatment, of which n=20 (15.5%) received Bmab in 3rd line. There were 127/2,604 (4.9%) WT patients who were treated with Pmab in 1st line. Of those 127 patients, n=46 (36.2%) survived and elected to continue treatment in 2nd line as follows: n=11 (29.3%) continued treatment with Pmab in 2nd line, while n=14 (30.4%) initiated treatment with Bmab, n=4 (8.7%) initiated treatment with Cmab, and n=16 (36.4%) did not receive a biologic in 2nd line. Conclusions: A small proportion of patients continued treatment with the same biologic throughout subsequent lines of therapy. Many patients were not treated with a biologic in any line, even if they were confirmed WT.

A survey of medical oncologist’s opinions and perceptions regarding the management of dermatologic toxicities among mCRC patients treated with panitumumab in the United States

639

Background: Dermatologic toxicity can be a limiting factor for the use of anti-EGFR therapy such as panitumumab. There is a paucity of real world data regarding the management of dermatologic toxicity among metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with panitumumab in the United States (U.S.). The objective of this study is to describe oncologist's opinions regarding timing of skin rash management in relation to the initiation of treatment and perceptions regarding rash management strategies. Methods: A total of 125 oncologists were recruited from a national database via a third independent party. Eligible oncologists (i.e.: licensed and practicing oncologist who had treated at least three new or continuing mCRC patients with panitumumab in the last year) completed an online survey to report their opinions regarding the grade and type of dermatologic toxicities seen and their perceptions about management strategies for mCRC patients who are treated with panitumumab. The timing of rash management initiation was defined as pre-emptive (prior to the appearance of the rash) or reactive (after any signs of skin rash). Results: Based upon their collective experience, oncologists expect that 44% of patients will develop acneiform rash while on treatment. More than half (58%) of the oncologists reported they did not follow any practice guidelines regarding the management of dermatologic toxicities. The oncologists reported that they pre-emptively initiated the management of dermatologic toxicities in 53% of their patients. Skin moisturizer and sunscreen were reported to be the most critical preemptive management approach, while skin moisturizer, over-the-counter topical steroids, and oral antibiotics were reported to be the most critical reactive management tools for Grades 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Conclusions: Despite evidence from randomized controlled trials, a majority of oncologists do not follow guidelines for dermatologic management of EGFR-I rash. There is a clear need for better physician education and awareness of mitigation strategies for skin toxicity management in mCRC patients treated with panitumumab.

Patterns of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF testing among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in the EU5

637

Background: In mid-2013, the requirement for mCRC patients treated with panitumumab changed from wild-type KRAS to wild-type RAS ( KRAS and NRAS). The objective of this study was to describe patterns of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF testing among mCRC patients in the EU5 (United Kingdom (U.K.), Germany, France, Italy and Spain). Methods: This descriptive study utilized Oncology Analyzer data (IMS Health Oncology, Fairfield, CT, USA), which provides real-world quarterly cross-sectional, epidemiologic and clinical data for mCRC patients. Trends in biomarker testing during the study period were evaluated by calculating the frequencies and proportions of patients who were /were not tested for combinations of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF within each of the five countries. KRAS and BRAF data were available in all countries from quarter three (Q3) 2012 to quarter two (Q2) 2015. NRAS was available in all countries from quarter 1 (Q1) 2014 to Q2 2015. Frequencies and proportions were also calculated to summarize patient demographic and clinical characteristics between groups with different testing choices. Results: A total of 32,961 patients with mCRC were included in the analyses. Prior to 2013, the majority of patients in each country were tested for only KRAS. The proportion of patients tested for both KRAS and NRAS increased substantially during the period of data availability for NRAS (Q1 2014 to Q2 2015), including <1% to 19.1% in the U.K., 8.8% to 31.9% in France, 13.1% to 43.2% in Germany, 5.9% to 24.6% in Italy, and 8.7% to 31.4% in Spain. The proportion of patients who were tested for all three biomarkers also increased during the period of data availability for all three biomarkers (Q1 2014 to Q2 2015), including 2.3% to 16.4% in the U.K., 4.8% to 26.6% in France, <1% to 2.4% in Germany, 4.2% to 22.3% in Italy, and 1.5% to 9.3% in Spain. There were few differences in patient demographic or clinical characteristics between those with different testing groups. Conclusions: This analysis provides a description of biomarker testing using read-world data and suggests an overall increase in testing among mCRC patients in the EU5. Although there was a trend towards increased testing, many mCRC patients are still not tested for these important biomarkers.

Assessment of treatment with panitumumab, cetuximab, and bevacizumab among mCRC patients with wild-type RAS or BRAF treated at community cancer centers in the United States

663

Background: There is limited observational data on the use of RAS test results and treatment patterns with chemotherapy and biologics among metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Our objective was to use real world data to evaluate the treatment sequences of mCRC patients who have wild-type RAS (KRAS, NRAS), or BRAF and who are treated at community cancer clinics within the United States (U.S.). Methods: The sample included 536 patients in the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records (OSCER) database who were diagnosed with mCRC between 1/1/2011 and 8/31/2015. All patients had available treatment data and were confirmed to have wild-type RAS or BRAF. Patients were stratified into mutually-exclusive categories based on 1st line treatment with chemotherapy in combination with either bevacizumab (Bmab), cetuximab (Cmab), panitumumab (Pmab), a combination of Pmab, Cmab or Bmab, or no biologics. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Results: The demographics of the sample were as follows: mean age 67 years (standard deviation = 12), 55% male, 70% White, and 50% with ECOG value of zero. The use of Bmab, Cmab, or Pmab in combination with chemotherapy in 1st line treatment was follows: Bmab only (n = 270, 50%), Cmab only (n = 81, 15%), Pmab only (n = 28, 5%), and a combination of either Bmab, Cmab and/or Pmab (n = 6, 1%). No biologics were administered to 151 (28%) of the sample in 1st line. There were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, race, insurance type, region of the U.S. or ECOG status at mCRC diagnosis across the 1st line treatment categories. Of the 385 patients who received a biologic in 1st line, 94 (24%) of those who survived and selected to continue treatment received a biologic in 2nd line. Of these 94 patients, 25 (27%) of those who survived and selected to continue treatment also received a biologic in 3rd line. Conclusions: Bmab was the most commonly-used biologic among mCRC patients with wild-type RAS or BRAF in this descriptive study. Future research is needed to better understand what factors impact treatment decisions among mCRC patients.

RAS mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of real-world data

513

Background: Guidelines for prescribing anti-EGFR therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) require prior testing to confirm RAS (exons 2, 3, 4 of KRAS and NRAS) wild-type status in Europe and the USA. There is limited published evidence reporting the prevalence of RAS mutations in patients with mCRC in a real-world setting. The aim of this study was to use data from a range of real-world sources to obtain RAS mutation prevalence estimates for different geographic regions. Methods: Aggregated RAS mutation prevalence data were collected from 13 sources, including individual pathology centers (n = 7), mCRC registries (n = 3), and Amgen-sponsored studies (n = 3). Data sources included in this study originated in Europe (n = 10), the Middle East (n = 2), and South America (n = 1). A meta-analysis of all collected data was carried out to investigate the effect of heterogeneity amongst the data sources and obtain pooled RAS prevalence estimates for each, using a mixed regression model. Results: Aggregate data from 4322 patients with mCRC were included in the pooled meta-analysis. The overall RAS mutation prevalence across all data sources was estimated to be 43.5% (95% CI: 41.5–45.5%). RAS mutation prevalence varied between data sources, ranging from low estimates of 33.7% (95% CI: 28.4–39.3%) for a Middle Eastern pathology dataset, and 34.6% (95% CI: 27.7–42.1%) for a Middle Eastern mCRC registry, to the highest estimates of 53.6% (95% CI: 43.2–63.8%) and 54.1% (95% CI: 51.7–56.5%) in two European pathology centers, in the Czech Republic and Poland, respectively. Conclusions: This is one of the first studies to carry out a large pooled analysis of RAS mutation prevalence, based on real-world data. There was a high degree of heterogeneity between the sources included, possibly due to the types of data source, patient selection criteria, geographic location, or differences in laboratory testing methods. The estimated RAS mutation prevalence reported here is lower than that in a recent pooled analysis of past clinical trials, which reported an overall prevalence of 55.5% (95% CI: 53.9–57.9%) (Peeters M, et al. Eur J Cancer 2015;51:1704–13). Further investigations are required to explain the disparity in these findings.

The prevalence RAS and BRAF mutations among patients in the Middle East and Northern Africa with metastatic colorectal cancer

598

Background: Anti-EGFR therapies are recommended for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with confirmed wild-type RAS (exons 2, 3, 4 of KRAS and NRAS) status. There is limited published information on the prevalence of RAS mutations using real world data. The objective of this study was estimate the prevalence of RAS and BRAF mutations among patients with mCRC in the Middle East and Northern Africa (MENA) in an effort to inform the rationale for biomarker testing and treatment choice. Methods: The study included 1,669 patients from August 2013 to July 2015 with mCRC from Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emeritus. Information on RAS mutation status was obtained from one pathology lab using High Resolution Melting Analysis. Extended RAS analysis was conducted in a subset of patients, including: overall RAS (exon 2, 3, 4 of KRAS and NRAS; n = 750), KRAS exon 2 (n = 750), KRAS exon 3 and 4 (n = 507), NRAS exon 2, 3, and 4 (n = 507), and BRAF exon 15 (n = 78). The proportion of patients with each mutation was summarized. Results: The overall RAS mutation in the full sample was 35.3% (n = 589/1669). The observed mutation for KRAS exon 2 in a subset of patients with extended RAS analysis (n = 750) was 32.4% (243/750). Out of the subjects with wild-type exon 2 (n = 507), the observed mutations rates were as follows: KRAS exon 4 (20/507 = 3.9%), KRAS exon 3 (13/507 = 2.6%), NRAS exon 2 (7/507 = 1.4%), NRAS exon 3 (6/507 = 1.2%), and NRAS exon 4 (0%). The prevalence of BRAF exon 15 was 3.8% (3/78). The most robust data on specific RAS mutations was obtained from Algeria, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia. The prevalence of KRAS exon 2 mutations in these countries was as follows: Algeria (n = 33/86 = 38.4%), Egypt (n = 83/303 = 27.4%), Saudi Arabia (n = 85/245 = 34.7%). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the prevalence of RAS and BRAF mutations in the Middle East using real world data. The results of this descriptive study illustrate that there is variation in the prevalence of RAS and BRAF mutations in MENA.

Characterization of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF testing and timing among mCRC patients treated at community cancer centers in the United States

695

Background: The requirement to establish RAS status prior to administration of an EGFR inhibitor has increased the need to understand which patients are tested for RAS and the length of time it takes for the treating oncologist to receive the RAS test result. Our objective was to evaluate factors that may influence RAS testing among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and the turn-around time for RAS testing among patients who are treated at community cancer centers in the United States (U.S.). Methods: The sample includes 1550 patients in the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records (OSCER) database who were diagnosed with mCRC between 1/1/2011 and 8/31/2015. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were evaluated at the time of mCRC diagnosis. The median number of days and interquartile range (IQR) between the following dates was summarized: diagnosis for mCRC, tissue collection for biomarker testing, tissue was received by the lab for biomarker testing, and biomarker results returned to the oncologist. Results: The frequency of RAS testing was as follows: KRAS (n = 964; 62%), NRAS (n = 116; 7%), BRAF (n = 231; 15%), all three simultaneously (n = 94, 6%). There were significant differences in KRAS testing by age and type of insurance, with young (p < 0.001) and commercially-insured (p = 0.01) patients more likely to receive testing. The median number of days and IQR between specimen collection and diagnosis of mCRC was as follows: KRAS (0; 0 to 443), NRAS (0; -18.5 to 362), and BRAF (-3; -474 to 0). The median number of calendar days between the date the specimen was collected and the date it was received by the lab was as follows: KRAS (19; 1 to 303), NRAS (34.5, 8 to 518), and BRAF (29; 2 to 428). The median number of days between the date the specimen was received by the lab and the date the result was returned to the oncologist was as follows: KRAS (7; 5 to 13), NRAS (10; 7 to 15), and BRAF (8; 6 to 14). Conclusions: Many patients had a specimen collected for biomarker testing at the time of mCRC diagnosis and the results were generally returned to the treating oncologist within one week of it arriving at the lab.

International burden of chronic kidney disease and secondary hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review of the literature and available data

The international burden of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is unknown, but it may be estimable through the available chronic kidney disease and SHPT literature. Structured reviews of biomedical literature and online data systems were performed for selected countries to ascertain recent estimates of the incidence, prevalence, and survival of individuals with CKD and SHPT. International societies of nephrology were contacted to seek additional information regarding available data. Estimates were abstracted from 35 sources reporting estimates of CKD in 25 countries. Population prevalence estimates of CKD stages 3-5 in adults ranged from approximately 1 to 9% (China, Mexico, resp.). Estimates of the population prevalence of maintenance dialysis therapy ranged from 79 per million population (pmp; China) to 2385 pmp (Japan); incidence rates ranged from 91 pmp (United Kingdom) to 349 pmp (United States). Prevalence of SHPT among stage 5D populations was highly variable and dependent upon the disease definition used. Among the few nations reporting, approximately 30-50% of stage 5D patients had serum parathyroid hormone levels >300 pg/mL. Reported incidence and prevalence estimates across the individual nations were variable, likely reflecting differing population demographics, risk factors, etiologies, and availability of treatment through all stages of CKD.

A multicenter phase I study of cabazitaxel (Cbz), mitoxantrone (Mito), and prednisone (Pred) (CAMP) for chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

243

Background: Cbz/pred extends survival in mCRPC patients (pts) following docetaxel and first-line studies comparing Cbz to docetaxel are ongoing. Mito/pred also has anti-tumor activity in mCRPC and a non-overlapping mechanism of action and toxicity profile with Cbz. A multicenter phase I trial was initiated through the DOD PCCTC to establish the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of Cbz, Mito, and Pred. Methods: Chemotherapy (chemo)-naive pts with mCRPC were enrolled in an accelerated titration design. The primary objective was to determine the MTD of CAMP; secondary objectives included assessing PSA and objective response rates and duration of response. Starting dose of Cbz was 25 mg/m2 (the currently approved single-agent dose) and Mito 4 mg/m2, administered on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Mito was escalated by 2 mg/m2 per dose level. Pred 5 mg BID and pegfilgrastim were administered with each cycle. Results: 9 pts were enrolled (dose level I, N = 1; dose level II, N = 1; dose level III, N = 3; dose level IV N = 4). The median age was 67 (range 55-81) and the median baseline PSA was 82.3 (range 20.4-791.2). There were 2 DLTs observed at dose level IV (Cbz 25 mg/m2 + mito 10 mg/m2), both grade 4 sepsis. The most common grade 3 adverse events were hematologic (neutropenia, n = 5; febrile neutropenia, n = 2, thrombocytopenia, n = 2). 6 of 9 pts remain on study (range 2.2 - 10.5+ months). Maximal PSA declines from baseline > 50% have been observed in 4/7 (57%) evaluable pts to date. 2 of 4 pts with measurable disease have experienced partial responses and a third has had a minor response after 4 cycles of chemo. The median progression-free survival and duration of response have not been reached. Conclusions: The approved single-agent dosage of Mito (12 mg/m2) could not be safely reached in combination with Cbz 25 mg/m2. Pre-planned evaluation of an alternate dosing strategy combining Mito with Cbz 20 mg/m2, which has demonstrated activity in mCRPC and potentially less hematologic toxicity, is underway. Preliminary efficacy data are encouraging but additional follow-up and further study of the treatment combination is required. Clinical trial information: NCT01594918.

Adults with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour: the costs and outcomes of in- and out-of-area placements

BACKGROUND

People with severe challenging behaviour are vulnerable to exclusion from local services and removal to out-of-area placements if locally available supported accommodation is insufficient to meet their needs. There are concerns about the high costs and potentially poorer outcomes of out-of-area placements but relatively little is known about how costs and outcomes compare with provision for a similar population placed locally.

METHODS

Costs, quality of care and a wide range of quality of life outcomes for 38 people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour living in-area and 38 similar people living out-of-area were compared. The two groups were matched as far as possible on risk factors for out-of-area placement. The out-of-area group represented two-thirds of the total number of people who originated from the territory served by the largest specialist health service in Wales and were placed in residential settings at least 10 miles beyond its boundaries.

RESULTS

There was a mixed pattern of quality of care and quality of outcome advantages between the two types of setting, although in-area placements had a greater number of advantages than out-of-area placements. Unexpectedly, out-of-area placements had lower total costs, accommodation costs and daytime activity costs.

CONCLUSIONS

No overall conclusion could be reached about cost-effectiveness. A number of potential reasons for the differences in cost were identified. Although additional resources may be needed to provide in-area services for those currently placed out-of-area, government policy to provide comprehensively for those who want to live locally, irrespective of their needs, appears to be attainable.

A multisource approach to improving epidemiologic estimates: application to global B-cell malignancies

The compilation of comprehensive, worldwide epidemiologic data can inform hypotheses on cancer etiology and guide future drug development. These statistics are reported by a multitude of sources using varying methods; thus, compiling a complete database of these statistics is a challenge. To this end, this paper examined the usefulness of a novel, multisource approach—extracting data from the peer-reviewed literature, online reports, and query systems from cancer registries and health agencies and directly contacting cancer registry personnel—for building a comprehensive, multinational epidemiologic cancer database. The major B-cell malignancies were chosen as the cancer subtype to test this approach largely because their epidemiology has not been well characterized in the peer-reviewed literature. We found that a multisource approach yields a more comprehensive epidemiologic database than what would have been possible with the use of literature searches alone. In addition, our paper revealed that cancer registries vary considerably in their methodology, comprehensiveness, and ability to gather information on specific B-cell malignancy subtypes. Collectively, this paper demonstrates the feasibility and value of a multisource approach to gathering epidemiologic data.

Examination of ancestral informative markers and self-reported race with tumor characteristics of breast cancer among Black and White women

African American (AA) women have a higher mortality from breast cancer (BC) compared to European American (EA) women. This may be due to the higher proportion of AA women with tumors that are diagnosed at more advanced stages and are characterized as being estrogen receptor negative (ER-)/progesterone receptor negative (PR-). Our study sought to determine whether self-reported race and percent African ancestry were associated with BC tumor characteristics. In a multi-center, population-based case-control study of BC, we determined percent African ancestry using ancestry informative markers (AIM) among women self-reporting race as AA or Black. BC tumor characteristics were associated with self-reported race (including a 30 % reduction in ER+/PR+ tumors [95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.6-0.9] and a 1.5-fold increased risk of high grade [95 % CI: 1.2-1.9] for AA women compared to EA women). AIMs among AA women were not associated with BC tumor characteristics (AA women with ≥95 % versus <80 % African ancestry, odds ratio [OR] = 1.0 for ER+/PR+ [95 % CI: 0.6-1.8] and OR = 0.9 for high-grade tumors [95 % CI: 0.6-1.4]). Similar findings were observed for BC stage. While BC subtypes were associated with self-reported race, BC subtypes were not associated with percent African ancestry. These study results suggest that subtle differences in percent African ancestry are less important than the overall presence of African ancestry in relation to BC tumor characteristics.

Estrogen-related genes and their contribution to racial differences in breast cancer risk

Racial differences in breast cancer risk, including the risks of hormone receptor subtypes of breast cancer, have been previously reported. We evaluated whether variation in genes related to estrogen metabolism (COMT, CYP1A1, CYP1B1, CYP17A1, CYP19A1, ESR1, GSTM1, GSTP1, GSTT1, HSD17B1, SULT1A1, and UGT1A1) contributes to breast cancer risk and/or racial differences in risk within the CARE study, a multi-centered, population-based case-control study of breast cancer. Genetic variation was assessed as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), haplotypes, and SNP-hormone therapy (HT) interactions within a subset of 1,644 cases and 1,451 controls, including 949 Black women (493 cases and 456 controls), sampled from the CARE study population. No appreciable associations with breast cancer risk were detected for single SNPs or haplotypes in women overall. We detected SNP-HT interactions in women overall within CYP1B1 (rs1800440; p (het) = 0.003) and within CYP17A1 (rs743572; p (het) = 0.009) in which never users of HT were at a decreased risk of breast cancer, while ever users were at a non-significant increased risk. When investigated among racial groups, we detected evidence of an SNP-HT interaction with CYP1B1 in White women (p value = 0.02) and with CYP17A1 in Black women (p value = 0.04). This analysis suggests that HT use may modify the effect of variation in estrogen-related genes on breast cancer risk, which may affect Black and White women to a different extent.

Abstract A89: Examination of ancestral informative markers and self-reported race with tumor characteristics of breast cancer among black and white women

African American (AA) women have higher mortality from breast cancer (BC) compared to European American (EA) women. This may be due to the higher proportion of AA women with tumors that are diagnosed at advanced stage and are estrogen receptor negative (ER-) /progesterone receptor negative (PR-). Our study sought to determine whether self-reported race and percent African ancestry were associated with BC tumor characteristics. In a multi-center, population-based case-control study of BC, we determined percent African ancestry using ancestry informative markers (AIM) among women self-reporting as Black. While self-reported race was associated with several BC tumor characteristics, AIMs markers among AA women were not. Specifically, women self-reporting as Black were at a 30% reduction in ER+/PR+ tumors (95% CI: 0.6–0.9), a non-significant risk of ER-/PR-tumors (OR = 1.3 [95% CI: 0.9–1.7]), a 1.4-fold increased risk of regional/distant stage (95% CI: 1.1–1.7) and a 1.5-fold increased risk of high grade tumors (95% CI: 1.2–1.9) compared to EA women. Percent African ancestry was not associated with any BC tumor characteristics (OR=1.0 for ER+/PR+ [95% CI: 0.6–1.8], OR = 0.9 for ER-/PR-[95% CI: 0.5–1.6], OR = 1.3 for regional/distant stage [95% CI: 0.8–2.1], and OR=0.9 for high-grade tumors [95% CI: 0.6–1.4] comparing those with ≥95% African ancestry to those with &lt;80% African ancestry). This analysis suggests that factors unrelated to AA women's genetic ancestry contribute to racial differences in BC tumor characteristics.

Citation Information: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20(10 Suppl):A89.