Healthcare utilization and unmet needs of patients with antisynthetase syndrome: An international patient survey

Antisynthease syndrome (ASSD) is a rare, complex and understudied autoimmune disease. Internet-based studies can overcome barriers of traditional on-site research and are therefore very appealing for rare diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate patient-reported symptoms, diagnostic delay, symptoms, medical care, health status, working status, disease knowledge and willingness to participate in research of ASSD patients by conducting an international web-based survey. The multilingual questionnaire was created by an international group of rheumatologists and patients and distributed online. 236 participants from 22 countries completed the survey. 184/236 (78.0%) were female, mean age (SD) was 49.6 years (11.3) and most common antisynthetase antibody was Jo-1 (169/236, 71.6%). 79/236 (33.5%) reported to work full-time. Median diagnostic delay was one year. The most common symptom at disease onset was fatigue 159/236 (67.4%), followed by myalgia 130/236 (55.1%). The complete triad of myositis, arthritis and lung involvement verified by a clinician was present in 42/236 (17.8%) at disease onset and in 88/236 (37.3%) during the disease course. 36/236 (15.3%) reported to have been diagnosed with fibromyalgia and 40/236 (16.3%) with depression. The most reported immunosuppressive treatments were oral corticosteroids 179/236 (75.9%), followed by rituximab 85/236 (36.0%). 73/236 (30.9%) had received physiotherapy treatment. 71/236 (30.1%) reported to know useful online information sources related to ASSD. 223/236 (94.5%) were willing to share health data for research purposes once a year. Our results reiterate that internet-based research is invaluable for cooperating with patients to foster knowledge in rare diseases.

POS0855 IMPAIRED PROMIS PHYSICAL FUNCTION IN IDIOPATHIC INFLAMMATORY MYOPATHY PATIENTS: RESULTS FROM THE MULTICENTER COVAD PATIENT REPORTED E-SURVEY

Background

Evaluation of physical function is fundamental in the management of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a National Institute of Health initiative established in 2004 to develop patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with improved validity and efficacy. PROMIS Physical Function (PF) short forms have been validated for use in IIMs [1].

Objectives

To investigate the physical function status of IIM patients compared to those with non-IIM autoimmune diseases (AIDs) and healthy controls (HCs) utilizing PROMIS PF data obtained in the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) study, a large-scale, international self-reported e-survey assessing the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in AID patients [2].

Methods

The survey data regarding demographics, IIM and AID diagnosis, disease activity, and PROMIS PF short form-10a scores were extracted from the COVAD study database. The disease activity (active vs inactive) of each patient was assessed in 3 different ways: (1) physician’s assessment (active if there was an increased immunosuppression), (2) patient’s assessment (active vs inactive as per patient), and (3) current steroid use. These 3 definitions of disease activity were applied independently to each patient. PROMIS PF-10a scores were compared between each disease category (IIMs vs non-IIM AIDs vs HCs), stratified by disease activity based on the 3 definitions stated above, employing negative binominal regression model. Multivariable regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, and ethnicity was performed clustering countries, and the predicted PROMIS PF-10a score was calculated based on the regression result. Factors affecting PROMIS PF-10a scores other than disease activity were identified by another multivariable regression analysis in the patients with inactive disease (IIMs or non-IIM AIDs).

Results

1057 IIM patients, 3635 non-IIM AID patients, and 3981 HCs responded to the COVAD survey until August 2021. The median age of the respondents was 43 [IQR 30-56] years old, and 74.8% were female. Among IIM patients, dermatomyositis was the most prevalent diagnosis (34.8%), followed by inclusion body myositis (IBM) (23.6%), polymyositis (PM) (16.2%), anti-synthetase syndrome (11.8%), overlap myositis (7.9%), and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) (4.6%). The predicted mean of PROMIS PF-10a scores was significantly lower in IIMs compared to non-IIM AIDs or HCs (36.3 [95% (CI) 35.5-37.1] vs 41.3 [95% CI 40.2-42.5] vs 46.2 [95% CI 45.8-46.6], P < 0.001), irrespective of disease activity or the definitions of disease activity used (physician’s assessment, patient’s assessment, or steroid use) (Figure 1). The largest difference between active IIMs and non-IIM AIDs was observed when the disease activity was defined by patient’s assessment (35.0 [95% CI 34.1-35.9] vs 40.1 [95% CI 38.7-41.5]). Considering the subgroups of IIMs, the scores were significantly lower in IBM in comparison with non-IBM IIMs (P < 0.001). The independent factors associated with low PROMIS PF-10a scores in the patients with inactive disease were older age, female gender, and the disease category being IBM, PM, or IMNM.

Conclusion

Physical function is significantly impaired in IIMs compared to non-IIM AIDs or HCs, even in patients with inactive disease. The elderly, women, and IBM groups are the worst affected, suggesting that developing targeted strategies to minimize functional disability in certain groups may improve patient reported physical function and disease outcomes.

References

[1]Saygin D, Oddis CV, Dzanko S, et al. Utility of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) physical function form in inflammatory myopathy. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021; 51: 539-46.

[2]Sen P, Gupta L, Lilleker JB, et al. COVID-19 vaccination in autoimmune disease (COVAD) survey protocol. Rheumatol Int. 2022; 42: 23-9.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all respondents for filling the questionnaire. The authors thank The Myositis Association, Myositis India, Myositis UK, the Myositis Global Network, Cure JM, Cure IBM, Sjögren’s India Foundation, EULAR PARE, and various other patient support groups and organizations for their invaluable contribution in the dissemination of this survey among patients which made the data collection possible. The authors also thank all members of the COVAD study group.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0899 HIGH FATIGUE SCORES IN PATIENTS WITH IDIOPATHIC INFLAMMATORY MYOPATHIES: A MULTIGROUP COMPARATIVE STUDY FROM THE COVAD E-SURVEY

Background

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a rare, multisystem, heterogeneous diseases, and contribute to high psychological burden. The patients’ perception of physical health, deteriorating independence and social and environmental relationships may not always be a direct function of disease activity. To face with these aspects, several worldwide specialized organization have recommended the use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) both in clinical trials and observational studies to highlight patient’s perception of the disease (1). Unfortunately, data on fatigue scores in IIM is limited.

Objectives

We compared fatigue VAS scores in patients with IIM, autoimmune diseases (AIDs) and healthy controls (HCs) and triangulated them with PROMIS physical function in a large international cohort made up of answers from the e-survey regarding the COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) study.

Methods

Data of 16327 respondents was extracted from the COVAD database on August 31th 2021. VAS fatigue scores were compared between AID, HC and IIM using univariate followed by multivariate analysis after adjusting for baseline differences. We further performed a propensity score matched analysis on 1827 subjects after adjusting for age, gender and ethnicity. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables, and Bonferroni’s correction was applied for the post hoc analyses considering IIMs as a reference group.

Results

We analyzed answers from 6988 patients, with a mean age of 43.8 years (SD 16.2). The overall percentage of female was 72% and the population ethnicity was mainly composed of White (55.1%), followed by Asian (24.6%), and Hispanic (13.8%). The overall fatigue VAS was 3.6 mm (SD 2.7). IIMs VAS was 4.8 mm (SD 2.6), AIDs 4.5 mm (SD 2.6), and HC 2.8 mm (SD 2.6) (P <0,001). VAS fatigue scores of IIMs were comparable with AIDs (P 0.084), albeit significantly higher than the HCs (P <0,001). Notably, fatigue VAS was lower in IIMs than AIDs in two distinct subsets: inactive disease as defined by the patient’s perception and the “excellent” general health condition group, where IIMs had worse scores (P <0,05). Interestingly, fatigue VAS was comparable in active disease defined by physician assessment, patient perception, based on general functional status, or when defined by steroid dose being prescribed. Notably, after propensity matched analysis of patients adjusting for gender, age and ethnicity (1.827 answers, i.e. 609 subjects per group, P =1) the differences disappeared and IIMs and AIDs had comparable fatigue levels across all levels of disease activity, although the fatigue discrepancies with HCs were substantially confirmed.

After application of a multivariate linear regression analysis we found that lower fatigue VAS scores were related to HC (P <0,001), male gender (P <0,001), Asian and Hispanic ethnicities (P <0,001 and 0,003).

Conclusion

Our study confirms that there is a higher prevalence of fatigue in all the AIDs patients, with comparable VAS scores between IIMs and other AIDs. We can also read our data commenting that females and/or Caucasians patients suffer a higher impact of this manifestation of chronic autoimmune diseases upon their lives. This is why these subjects, to our judgement, should be carefully evaluated during outpatients visits and to whom we should spend some extra time to discuss health related issues and how to improve them.

References

[1]Regardt, M. et al. OMERACT 2018 Modified Patient-reported Outcome Domain Core Set in the Life Impact Area for Adult Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies. J. Rheumatol.46, 1351–1354 (2019).

Figure 1.

distribution of Fatigue VAS scores in the three population evaluated. IIM idiopathic inflammatory myositis; AID autoimmune diseases; HC healthy controls; * P < 0,05.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS1260 COVID-19 VACCINATION-RELATED ADVERSE EVENTS AMONG AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE PATIENTS: RESULTS FROM THE COVID-19 VACCINATION IN AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES (COVAD) STUDY

Background

COVID-19 vaccines have been proven to be safe and effective in the healthy population at large. However, significant gaps remain in the evidence of their safety in patients with systemic autoimmune and inflammatory disorders (SAIDs). Patients and rheumatologists have expressed concerns regarding vaccination triggered allergic reactions, thrombogenic events, and other adverse events (ADEs) contributing to vaccine hesitancy (1)

Objectives

This study aimed to assess and compare short term COVID-19 vaccination associated ADEs in patients with SAIDs and healthy controls (HC) seven days post-vaccination, as well as between patients with SAIDs receiving different vaccines.

Methods

We developed an comprehensive, patient self-reporting electronic-survey to collect respondent demographics, SAID details, COVID-19 infection history, COVID-19 vaccination details, 7-day post vaccination adverse events and patient reported outcome measures using the PROMIS tool. After pilot testing, validation, translation into 18 languages on the online platform surveymonkey.com, and vetting by international experts, the survey was circulated in early 2021 by a multicenter study group of >110 collaborators in 94 countries. ADEs were categorized as injection site pain, minor ADEs, major ADEs, and hospitalizations. We analyzed data from the baseline survey for descriptive and intergroup comparative statistics based on data distribution and variable type (data as median, IQR).

Results

10900 respondents [42 (30-55) years, 74% females and 45% Caucasians] were analyzed. 5,867 patients (54%) with SAIDs were compared with 5033 HCs. All respondents included in the final analysis had received a single dose of the vaccine and 69% had received 2 primary doses. Pfizer (39.8%) was the most common vaccine received, followed by Oxford/AstraZeneca (13.4%), and Covishield (10.9%). Baseline demographics differed by an older SAID population (mean age 42 vs. 33 years) and a greater female predominance (M:F= 1:4.7 vs. 1:1.8) compared to HCs.

79% had minor and only 3% had major vaccine ADEs requiring urgent medical attention overall. In adjusted analysis, among minor ADEs, abdominal pain [multivariate OR 1.6 (1.14-2.3)], dizziness [multivariate OR 1.3 (1.2-1.5)], and headache [multivariate OR 1.67 (1.3-2.2)], were more frequent in SAIDs than HCs. Overall major ADEs [multivariate OR 1.9 (1.6-2.2)], and throat closure [multivariate OR 5.7 (2.9-11.3)] were more frequent in SAIDs though absolute risk was small (0-4%) and rates of hospitalization were similarly small in both groups, with a small absolute risk (0-4%). Specific minor ADEs frequencies were different among different vaccine types, however, major ADEs and hospitalizations overall were rare (0-4%) and comparable across vaccine types in patients with SAIDs (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

A. Post Vaccination ADEs in SAIDs compared to HCs. B. Proportions of post COVID-19 vaccination ADEs in SAIDs by vaccine type.

Conclusion

Vaccination against COVID-19 is relatively safe and tolerable in patients with SAIDs. Certain minor vaccine ADEs are more frequent in SAIDs than HCs in this study, though are not severe and do not require urgent medical attention. SAIDs were at a higher risk of major ADEs than HCs, though absolute risk was small, and did not lead to increased hospitalizations. There are small differences in minor ADEs between vaccine types in patients with SAIDs.

References

[1]Boekel L, Kummer LY, van Dam KPJ, Hooijberg F, van Kempen Z, Vogelzang EH, et al. Adverse events after first COVID-19 vaccination in patients with autoimmune diseases. Lancet Rheumatol. 2021 Aug;3(8):e542–5.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all members of the COVAD study group for their invaluable role in the collection of data. The authors thank all respondents for filling the questionnaire. The authors thank The Myositis Association, Myositis India, Myositis UK, the Myositis Global Network, Cure JM, Cure IBM, Sjögren’s India Foundation, EULAR PARE, and various other patient support groups and organizations for their invaluable contribution in the dissemination of this survey among patients which made the data collection possible. The authors also thank all members of the COVAD study group.

Disclosure of Interests

Parikshit Sen: None declared, Naveen R: None declared, Arvind Nune: None declared, James B. Lilleker: None declared, Vishwesh Agarwal: None declared, Sinan Kardes: None declared, Minchul Kim: None declared, Jessica Day Grant/research support from: JD has received research funding from CSL Limited., Marcin Milchert: None declared, Tamer A Gheita: None declared, Babur Salim: None declared, Tsvetelina Velikova: None declared, Abraham Edgar Gracia-Ramos: None declared, Ioannis Parodis Speakers bureau: IP has received research funding and/or honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Elli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis and F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG., Consultant of: IP has received research funding and/or honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Elli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis and F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG., Grant/research support from: IP has received research funding and/or honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Elli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis and F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG., Albert Selva-O’Callaghan: None declared, Elena Nikiphorou Speakers bureau: EN has received speaker honoraria/participated in advisory boards for Celltrion, Pfizer, Sanofi, Gilead, Galapagos, AbbVie, Lilly, Consultant of: EN has received speaker honoraria/participated in advisory boards for Celltrion, Pfizer, Sanofi, Gilead, Galapagos, AbbVie, Lilly, Grant/research support from: EN has received speaker honoraria/participated in advisory boards for Celltrion, Pfizer, Sanofi, Gilead, Galapagos, AbbVie, Lilly, and holds research grants from Pfizer and Lilly., Tulika Chatterjee: None declared, Ai Lyn Tan Speakers bureau: ALT has received honoraria for advisory boards and speaking for Abbvie, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB., Consultant of: ALT has received honoraria for advisory boards and speaking for Abbvie, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB., Grant/research support from: ALT has received honoraria for advisory boards and speaking for Abbvie, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB., Lorenzo Cavagna: None declared, Miguel A Saavedra: None declared, Samuel Katsuyuki Shinjo: None declared, Nelly Ziade Speakers bureau: NZ has received speaker fees, advisory board fees and research grants from Pfizer, Roche, Abbvie, Eli Lilly, NewBridge, Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Pierre Fabre; none is related to this manuscript., Consultant of: NZ has received speaker fees, advisory board fees and research grants from Pfizer, Roche, Abbvie, Eli Lilly, NewBridge, Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Pierre Fabre; none is related to this manuscript., Grant/research support from: NZ has received speaker fees, advisory board fees and research grants from Pfizer, Roche, Abbvie, Eli Lilly, NewBridge, Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Pierre Fabre; none is related to this manuscript., Johannes Knitza: None declared, Masataka Kuwana: None declared, Oliver Distler Speakers bureau: OD has/had consultancy relationship with and/or has received research funding from or has served as a speaker for the following companies in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications in the last three years: Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, Corbus, CSL Behring, Galapagos, Glenmark, GSK, Horizon (Curzion), Inventiva, iQvia, Kymera, Lupin, Medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Roche, Roivant, Sanofi, Serodapharm, Topadur and UCB. Patent issued “mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis” (US8247389, EP2331143)., Consultant of: OD has/had consultancy relationship with and/or has received research funding from or has served as a speaker for the following companies in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications in the last three years: Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, Corbus, CSL Behring, Galapagos, Glenmark, GSK, Horizon (Curzion), Inventiva, iQvia, Kymera, Lupin, Medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Roche, Roivant, Sanofi, Serodapharm, Topadur and UCB. Patent issued “mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis” (US8247389, EP2331143)., Grant/research support from: OD has/had consultancy relationship with and/or has received research funding from or has served as a speaker for the following companies in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications in the last three years: Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, Corbus, CSL Behring, Galapagos, Glenmark, GSK, Horizon (Curzion), Inventiva, iQvia, Kymera, Lupin, Medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Roche, Roivant, Sanofi, Serodapharm, Topadur and UCB. Patent issued “mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis” (US8247389, EP2331143)., Hector Chinoy Speakers bureau: HC has served as a speaker for UCB, Biogen., Consultant of: HC has received consulting fees from Novartis, Eli Lilly, Orphazyme, Astra Zeneca, Grant/research support from: HC has received grant support from Eli Lilly and UCB, Vikas Agarwal: None declared, Rohit Aggarwal Consultant of: RA has/had a consultancy relationship with and/or has received research funding from for the following companies-Bristol Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, Genentech, Octapharma, CSL Behring, Mallinckrodt, AstraZeneca, Corbus, Kezar, Kyverna, Janssen, Roivant, Boehringer Ingelheim, Argenx, Q32, Alexion, EMD Serono, Jubliant, Abbvie, Janssen, Alexion, Argenx, Q32, EMD-Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roivant., Grant/research support from: RA has/had a consultancy relationship with and/or has received research funding from for the following companies-Bristol Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, Genentech, Octapharma, CSL Behring, Mallinckrodt, AstraZeneca, Corbus, Kezar, Kyverna, Janssen, Roivant, Boehringer Ingelheim, Argenx, Q32, Alexion, EMD Serono, Jubliant, Abbvie, Janssen, Alexion, Argenx, Q32, EMD-Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roivant., Latika Gupta: None declared

POS1232 LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF COVID-19 VACCINATION IN PATIENTS WITH RARE AND COMPLEX CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASES: AN AD-INTERIM ANALYSIS OF ERN-ReCONNET VACCINATE STUDY

Background

Since the COVID-19 vaccination campaign was launched all over Europe, there has been general agreement on how benefits of SARS-CoV2 vaccines outweigh the risks in patients with rare connective tissue diseases (rCTDs). Yet, there is still limited evidence regarding safety and efficacy of such vaccines in these patients, especially in the long-term. For this reason, in the framework of ERN-ReCONNET, an observational long-term study (VACCINATE) was designed in order to explore the long-term outcome of COVID-19 vaccination in rCTDs patients. The consent form was developed thanks to the involvement of the ERN ReCONNET ePAG Advocates (European Patients Advocacy Group).

Objectives

To evaluate the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccination in rCTDs patients and the potential impact on disease activity. Primary endpoints were the prevalence of adverse events (AEs) and of disease exacerbations post-vaccination. Secondary endpoints were the proportion of serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events of special interest for COVID-19 (adapted from https://brightoncollaboration.us/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/SO2_D2.1.2_V1.2_COVID-19_AESI-update-23Dec2020-review_final.pdf)

Methods

The first ad-interim analysis of the VACCINATE study involved 9 ERN-ReCONNET Network centres. Patients over 18 years of age with a known rCTD and who received vaccine against COVID-19 were eligible for recruitment. Demographic data and diagnoses were collected at the time of enrolment, while the appearance of AEs and potential disease exacerbations were monitored after one week from each vaccination dose, and then after 4, 12 and 24 weeks from the second dose. A disease exacerbation was defined as at least one of the following: new manifestations attributable to disease activity, hospitalization, increase in PGA from previous evaluation, addition of corticosteroids or immunosuppressants.

Results

A cohort of 300 patients (261 females, mean age 52, range 18-85) was recruited. Systemic lupus erythematosus (44%) and systemic sclerosis (16%) were the most frequent diagnoses, followed by Sjogren’s syndrome (SS,12%), idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IMM,10%), undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD,8%), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD,4%), Ehlers-Danlos’s syndrome (EDS,4%), antiphospholipid syndrome (APS,2%). AEs appearing 7 days after the first and second doses were reported in 93 (31%) and 96 (32%) patients respectively, mainly represented by fatigue, injection site reaction, headache, fever and myalgia. Otitis, urticaria, Herpes Simplex-related rash, stomatitis, migraine with aura, vertigo, tinnitus and sleepiness were reported with very low frequency. Less than 2% of patients experienced AEs within 24 weeks from the second dose. No SAEs or AEs of special interest were observed in the study period. There were 25 disease exacerbations (8%), 7 of which severe. The highest number of exacerbations was observed after 4 weeks from the second dose (12 within week 4, 6 within week 12 and 7 within week 24). Disease exacerbation was most frequent in patients with EDS (33%) and MCTD (25%).

Conclusion

This preliminary analysis shows that COVID-19 vaccination is safe in rCTDs patients. AEs appear most often early after vaccination and are usually mild. Disease exacerbations are not frequent, but can be potentially severe and tend to occur most frequently within the first month after vaccination. Exacerbations can also occur 3-6 months after vaccination, although a causal relationship with the vaccination remains to be established. Our present data underline the importance of long-term observational studies.

Table 1.

AEs and disease exacerbations per disease

DiagnosisPatients enrolled (%) (n=300)EAs after 1st and 2nd dose (%)Exacerbations (%)APS25714EDS45033IIM10527MCTD44225SS12598SLE44698SSC16492UCTD850-

Acknowledgements

VACCINATE is a study promoted by the European Reference Network on rare and complex connective tissue diseases, ERN ReCONNET. This publication was funded by the European Union’s Health Programme (2014-2020)

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0201 COVID-19 SEVERITY AND VACCINE BREAKTHROUGH INFECTIONS IN IDIOPATHIC INFLAMMATORY MYOPATHIES, OTHER SYSTEMIC AUTOIMMUNE AND INFLAMMATORY DISEASES, AND HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS: RESULTS FROM THE COVID-19 VACCINATION IN AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES (COVAD) STUDY

Background

Significant gaps are present in the evidence of the spectrum and severity of COVID-19 infection in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). IIM patients typically require immunosuppressive therapy, may have multiple disease sequelae, and frequent comorbidities, and thus may be more susceptible to severe COVID-19 infection and complications (1). The possibility of attenuated immunogenicity and reduced efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines due to concomitant immunosuppressive medication is a major concern in these patients, and there is little data available on COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections (BI) in IIM (2).

Objectives

This study aimed to compare disease spectrum and severity and COVID-19 BI in patients with IIM, other systemic autoimmune and inflammatory diseases (SAIDs) and healthy controls (HCs).

Methods

We developed an extensive self-reporting electronic-survey (COVAD survey) featuring 36 questions to collect respondent demographics, SAID details, COVID-19 infection history, COVID-19 vaccination details, 7-day post vaccination adverse events and patient reported outcome measures using the PROMIS tool. After pilot testing, validation, translation into 18 languages on the online platform surveymonkey.com, and vetting by international experts, the COVAD survey was circulated in early 2021 by a multicenter study group of >110 collaborators in 94 countries. BI was defined as COVID-19 infection occurring more than 2 weeks after receiving 1st or 2nd dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. We analyzed data from the baseline survey for descriptive and intergroup comparative statistics based on data distribution and variable type.

Results

10900 respondents [mean age 42 (30-55) years, 74% females and 45% Caucasians] were analyzed. 1,227 (11.2%) had IIM, 4,640 (42.6%) had other SAIDs, and 5,033 (46.2%) were HC. All respondents included in the final analysis had received a single dose of the vaccine and 69% had received 2 primary doses. Pfizer (39.8%) was the most common vaccine received, followed by Oxford/AstraZeneca (13.4%), and Covishield (10.9%). IIM patients were older, had a higher Caucasian representation and higher Pfizer uptake than other SAIDs, and HC. A higher proportion of IIM patients received immunosuppressants than other SAIDs.

IIMs were at a lower risk of symptomatic pre-vaccination COVID-19 infection compared to SAIDs [multivariate OR 0.6 (0.4-0.8)] and HCs [multivariate OR 0.39 (0.28-0.54)], yet at a higher risk of hospitalization due to COVID-19 compared to SAIDs [univariate OR 2.3 (1.2-3.5)] and HCs [multivariate OR 2.5 (1.1-5.8)]. BIs were very uncommon in IIM patients, with only 17 (1.4%) reporting BI. IIM patients were at a higher risk of contracting COVID-19 prior to vaccination than ≤2 weeks of vaccination [univariate OR 8 (4.1-15)] or BI [univariate OR 4.6 (2.7-8.0)]. BIs were equally severe compared to when they occurred prior to vaccination in IIMs, and were comparable between IIM, SAIDs, and HC (Figure 1), though BI disease duration was shorter in IIMs than SAIDs (7 vs 11 days, p 0.027). 13/17 IIM patients with BI were on immunosuppressants.

Conclusion

IIM patients experienced COVID-19 infection less frequently prior to vaccination but were at a higher risk of hospitalization and requirement for oxygen therapy compared with patients with HC. Breakthrough COVID-19 infections were rare (1.4%) in vaccinated IIM patients, and were similar to HC and SAIDs, except for shorter disease duration in IIM.

References

[1]Brito-Zerón P, Sisó-Almirall A, Flores-Chavez A, Retamozo S, Ramos-Casals M. SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2021 Jun;39(3):676–87.

[2]Wack S, Patton T, Ferris LK. COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disease: Review of available evidence. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Nov;85(5):1274–84.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all members of the COVAD study group for their invaluable role in the collection of data. The authors thank all respondents for filling the questionnaire. The authors thank The Myositis Association, Myositis India, Myositis UK, the Myositis Global Network, Cure JM, Cure IBM, Sjögren’s India Foundation, EULAR PARE, and various other patient support groups and organizations for their invaluable contribution in the dissemination of this survey among patients which made the data collection possible. The authors also thank all members of the COVAD study group.

Disclosure of Interests

Latika Gupta: None declared, Leonardo Santos Hoff: None declared, Naveen R: None declared, Parikshit Sen: None declared, Samuel Katsuyuki Shinjo: None declared, Jessica Day Grant/research support from: JD has received research funding from CSL Limited, James B. Lilleker: None declared, Vishwesh Agarwal: None declared, Sinan Kardes: None declared, Minchul Kim: None declared, Ashima Makol: None declared, Marcin Milchert: None declared, Tamer A Gheita: None declared, Babur Salim: None declared, Tsvetelina Velikova: None declared, Abraham Edgar Gracia-Ramos: None declared, Ioannis Parodis Speakers bureau: IP has received research funding and/or honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Elli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis and F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG., Consultant of: IP has received research funding and/or honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Elli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis and F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG., Grant/research support from: IP has received research funding and/or honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Elli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis and F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG., Albert Selva-O’Callaghan: None declared, Elena Nikiphorou Speakers bureau: EN has received speaker honoraria/participated in advisory boards for Celltrion, Pfizer, Sanofi, Gilead, Galapagos, AbbVie, Lilly, Consultant of: EN has received speaker honoraria/participated in advisory boards for Celltrion, Pfizer, Sanofi, Gilead, Galapagos, AbbVie, Lilly, Grant/research support from: EN holds research grants from Pfizer and Lilly., Tulika Chatterjee: None declared, Ai Lyn Tan Speakers bureau: ALT has received honoraria for advisory boards and speaking for Abbvie, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB., Consultant of: ALT has received honoraria for advisory boards and speaking for Abbvie, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB., Arvind Nune: None declared, Lorenzo Cavagna: None declared, Miguel A Saavedra: None declared, Nelly Ziade Speakers bureau: NZ has received speaker fees, advisory board fees and research grants from Pfizer, Roche, Abbvie, Eli Lilly, NewBridge, Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Pierre Fabre; none is related to this manuscript, Consultant of: NZ has received speaker fees, advisory board fees and research grants from Pfizer, Roche, Abbvie, Eli Lilly, NewBridge, Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Pierre Fabre; none is related to this manuscript, Grant/research support from: NZ has received speaker fees, advisory board fees and research grants from Pfizer, Roche, Abbvie, Eli Lilly, NewBridge, Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Pierre Fabre; none is related to this manuscript, Johannes Knitza: None declared, Masataka Kuwana: None declared, Oliver Distler Speakers bureau: OD has/had consultancy relationship with and/or has received research funding from or has served as a speaker for the following companies in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications in the last three years: Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, Corbus, CSL Behring, Galapagos, Glenmark, GSK, Horizon (Curzion), Inventiva, iQvia, Kymera, Lupin, Medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Roche, Roivant, Sanofi, Serodapharm, Topadur and UCB. Patent issued “mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis” (US8247389, EP2331143)., Consultant of: OD has/had consultancy relationship with and/or has received research funding from or has served as a speaker for the following companies in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications in the last three years: Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, Corbus, CSL Behring, Galapagos, Glenmark, GSK, Horizon (Curzion), Inventiva, iQvia, Kymera, Lupin, Medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Roche, Roivant, Sanofi, Serodapharm, Topadur and UCB. Patent issued “mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis” (US8247389, EP2331143)., Grant/research support from: OD has/had consultancy relationship with and/or has received research funding from or has served as a speaker for the following companies in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications in the last three years: Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, Corbus, CSL Behring, Galapagos, Glenmark, GSK, Horizon (Curzion), Inventiva, iQvia, Kymera, Lupin, Medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Roche, Roivant, Sanofi, Serodapharm, Topadur and UCB. Patent issued “mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis” (US8247389, EP2331143)., Hector Chinoy Speakers bureau: HC has been a speaker for UCB, Biogen., Consultant of: HC has received consulting fees from Novartis, Eli Lilly, Orphazyme, Astra Zeneca, Grant/research support from: HC has received grant support from Eli Lilly and UCB, Vikas Agarwal: None declared, Rohit Aggarwal Consultant of: RA has/had a consultancy relationship with and/or has received research funding from the following companies-Bristol Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, Genentech, Octapharma, CSL Behring, Mallinckrodt, AstraZeneca, Corbus, Kezar, and Abbvie, Janssen, Alexion, Argenx, Q32, EMD-Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roivant., Grant/research support from: RA has/had a consultancy relationship with and/or has received research funding from the following companies-Bristol Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, Genentech, Octapharma, CSL Behring, Mallinckrodt, AstraZeneca, Corbus, Kezar, and Abbvie, Janssen, Alexion, Argenx, Q32, EMD-Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roivant.

AB1287 DESIGN OF A GLOBAL PHASE 2/3 RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL EVALUATING THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF RAVULIZUMAB IN ADULTS WITH DERMATOMYOSITIS

Background

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a rare and life-altering chronic immune-mediated disease characterized by distinct skin rash and/or progressive muscle weakness and other systemic manifestations. Many patients are refractory and/or experience serious adverse effects when treated with currently prescribed medications, including high-dose systemic steroids and immunosuppressive therapies1-3, which are often prescribed off-label. Therefore, there is a need for new DM treatment options that offer more favorable risk-benefit profiles.

The classical complement pathway is implicated in DM pathophysiology, including a close correlation between endothelial deposition of the C5b-9 membrane attack complex (MAC) and organ damage.4 Treatment with the long-acting anti-C5 monoclonal antibody ravulizumab is associated with immediate, complete, and sustained inhibition of the complement protein C5, which prevents its cleavage to form MAC, and it has proven to be a safe and effective therapeutic approach for multiple complement-mediated diseases.5

Objectives

Given the continued unmet need in DM and the evidence implicating the terminal complement pathway in the disease pathophysiology, a global, multi-center double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 (Part A)/Phase 3 (Part B) trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the C5 inhibitor ravulizumab compared with placebo in adults with DM (ALXN1210-DM-310; NCT04999020; EudraCT2021-001200-15).

Methods

A total of 180 adult patients with DM6 who have active disease with muscle weakness and inadequate responses or intolerances to two or more DM treatments including glucocorticoids will be randomized to receive either intravenous ravulizumab or placebo, delivered as loading dose followed by maintenance administration once every eight weeks. Different patients will be enrolled in Parts A and B, which each consist of a screening period, a randomized, controlled period (Part A; 26 weeks; Part B: 50 weeks), and an open-label extension period. The primary endpoints are the proportion of patients with a minimal improvement from baseline on the ACR/EULAR Myositis Response Criteria Total Improvement Score (TIS20) at 26 weeks (Part A) and 50 weeks (Part B). In addition, a wide range of key secondary and exploratory outcome measures will be evaluated, including the mean change from baseline in the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) activity score and a novel participant-reported outcome measure, the Dermatomyositis-Disease Symptoms Questionnaire (DM-DSQ). Safety will be assessed by analyzing the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TEAEs), including those classified as serious and/or leading to intervention discontinuation.

Results

The ALXN1210-DM-310 trial is currently enrolling patients.

Conclusion

ALXN1210-DM-310 is the first global, multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2/3 interventional trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a C5 inhibitor in adult patients with DM who continue to have active disease despite treatment with standard medications.

References

[1]Joffe MM, Love LA, Leff RL, et al. Am J Med.1993; 94:379.

[2]Zieglschmid-Adams ME, Pandya AG, Cohen SB, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995; 32:754.

[3]Kissel JT, Levy RJ, Mendell JR, Griggs RC. Neurology 1986; 36:35.

[4]Yang SH, Chang C, Lian Z-X. J Transl Autoimmun. 2019;2:100018.

[5]https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/761108s012lbl.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2022.

[6]Lundberg IE, Tjarnlund A, Bottai M, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(12):2271-2282.

Disclosure of Interests

Lorenzo Cavagna: None declared, Rohit Aggarwal Consultant of: Alexion and AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Octapharma, Csl Behring, BMS, Argenx, Corbus, EMD, Janssen, Kezar, Kyverna, Roivant, and Mallinckrodt, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, BMS, Q32, EMD Serono, and Mallinckrodt, Noriko Iikuni Shareholder of: AstraZeneca, Employee of: Alexion/AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Sanjay Rakhade Shareholder of: AstraZeneca, Employee of: Alexion/AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Sanofi Genzyme

POS0863 ANTI-NOR90 ANTIBODIES IN THE SETTING OF CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASE: CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE AND COMPARISON WITH A COHORT OF PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS

Background

Anti-NOR90 antibodies are directed against a 90-kD nucleolar protein located in the nucleolus organizing regions (NORs), mainly described in systemic sclerosis (SSc) [1, 2, 3] but reported also in other rheumatologic and oncologic diseases [4, 5, 6]. The clinical correlates of anti-NOR90 antibodies are still to be defined because the cohorts described thus far include a low number of patients.

Objectives

To describe the characteristics of a large cohort of anti-NOR90 antibodies positive patients and compare them with a matched cohort of SSc patients negative for anti-NOR90 antibodies.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients positive for anti-NOR90 antibodies referring to participating centres. The concomitant positivity for anti-RNA polymerase III, Th/To, PM-Scl, Ku, and PDGFR antibodies was an exclusion criterion. In all cases the diagnoses, the different organ involvement and related clinical, instrumental and laboratory characteristics were evaluated. The EUROLINE SystemicSclerosisProfile kit from Euroimmun (Lübeck, Germany) was used to detect anti-NOR90 antibodies.

Results

We included 101 patients positive for anti-NOR90 (M/F=13/88, mean age 52.5 years). They were mainly classified as SSc (n=38), undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD) (n=21), interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) (n=11) (graph 1). The most frequent clinical manifestations were arthralgias (n=72), Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) (n=58), sicca syndrome (n=49), ILD (n=40), puffy fingers (n=32), arthritis (n=30), and limited skin sclerosis (n=24). Anti-NOR90 antibodies were associated with anti-Ro52 antibodies in the 16% of cases, with anticentromere antibodies in the 7% of cases, and with anti-Scl70 in the 5% of cases. After excluding these patients, and considering the isolated anti-NOR90 positivity, 12 patients had SSc, 35 UCTD, and 11 IPAF. The most frequent clinical manifestations were arthralgias (n=40), RP (n=37), and sicca syndrome (n=21). Compared to 242 matched SSc without anti-NOR90 antibodies, patients with anti-NOR90 had more frequently joint manifestations and sicca syndrome and less frequently all vasculopathic manifestations (RP, telangiectasias, pitting scars, acral ulcers), dysphagia and fibromyalgia.

Conclusion

Our study shows that anti-NOR90 antibodies are more commonly observed in females, and clinically associated with the occurrence of arthritis/arthralgias, sicca syndrome and RP. In more than the 50% of cases they may be found with other autoantibodies, such as the anti-Ro52, the anticentromere, and the anti-Scl70 antibodies. Anti-NOR90 seems to play an accompanying role in the context of CTDs, without strong influence on the clinical phenotype expression of the underlying CTD.

References

[1]Rodriguez-Sanchez et al., Anti-NOR 90. A new autoantibody in scleroderma that recognizes a 90-kDa component of the nucleolus-organizing region of chromatin, 1987.

[2]Hamaguchi et al., Clinical and immunologic predictors of scleroderma renal crisis in Japanese systemic sclerosis patients with anti-RNA polymerase III autoantibodies, 2015.

[3]Liaskos et al., Disease-related autoantibody profile in patients with systemic sclerosis, 2017.

[4]Imai et al., Immunocytochemical characterization of human NOR-90 (upstream binding factor) and associated antigens reactive with autoimmune sera. Two MR forms of NOR-90/hUBF autoantigens, 1994.

[5]Fujii et al., Detection of autoantibodies to nucleolar transcription factor NOR 90/hUBF in sera of patients with rheumatic diseases, by recombinant autoantigen-based assays, 1996.

[6]Yamashita et al., Clinical significance of anti-NOR90 antibodies in systemic sclerosis and idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, 2021.

Figure 1.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0924 THE ROLE OF RAYNAUD’S PHENOMENON ON MATERNAL AND FETAL OBSTETRICAL OUTCOMES

Background

It is established that Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) may influence pregnancy outcomes when secondary to rheumatic conditions (1,2). Data on the impact of primary RP (pRP) on pregnancy are very limited.

Objectives

To retrospectively evaluate the impact of pRP on pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

Women with pRP were included in the study. They were compared with a group of women affected by UCTD with RP, and by UCTD without RP. These women were assessed and followed at our outpatient clinic from January 2011 to October 2020 and they did not exhibit an evolution to a UCTD or to a definite CTD during at least one-year follow-up. Antiphospholipid antibody positivity, twin pregnancies and voluntary termination of pregnancy were exclusion criteria. Women with pRP were also compared with a group of healthy pregnant women enrolled by our gynaecologist during the first trimester of pregnancy. Maternal and foetal outcomes were retrospectively recorded. ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables, and the Chi2 test or the Fischer exact test for categorical were performed (level of significance. P<0.050). In the post-hoc analysis we used the Mann-Whitney test (quantitative variables) or with the Chi2 test/Fischer exact test (qualitative variables), applying the Bonferroni correction with pRP women as a reference group (level of significance: p<0.0167).

Results

The analysis included 188 women with a total of 375 pregnancies divided in 4 groups:

-Group “pRP”: 46 women with RP without secondary causes, and a total of 106 pregnancies (reference group),

-Group “RP-UCTD”: 48 UCTD women with RP and a total of 88 pregnancies,

-Group “UCTD”: 37 UCTD women without RP and a total of 88 pregnancies,

-Group “HC”: 57 healthy women with a total of 93 pregnancies.

The reference group did not differ from the others regarding age at conception.

Prophylactic acetylsalicylic acid was administered during pregnancy to 9% of patients with pRP compared to 1% in HC (p=0.010). In contrast, in the RP-UCTD this percentage was significantly higher (32%, p<0,001) than in pRP.

pRP group showed an increased rate of 1st trimester miscarriages (33% vs 16%, p=0.006, OR 2.05 and 95%CI 1.05-3.98), a lower median birth weights (3038 g vs 3358 g, p=0.002), a higher rate of infants with a birth weight <10th percentile (21% vs 3%, p=<0.001, OR 8.36 and 95% CI 1.85 - 37.84) with respect to HC. There was no statistically significant difference between the reference and the UCTD groups.

No statistically significant differences were observed when considering obstetrical outcomes (eg: mode of delivery, median gestation duration, gestational diabetes mellitus, hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, premature rupture of membranes, oligo-anhydramnios).

Conclusion

Our study shows that pRP in a retrospective cohort has an impact on pregnancy outcomes, with significantly more miscarriages and lower birth weight infants compared to HC. Importantly, pregnancy outcome in pRP women did not differ with respect to UCTD with and without RP, conditions generally associated to maternal morbidity, but in the RP-UCTD group prophylactic acetylsalicylic acid was more commonly prescribed.

Further prospective studies aiming at evaluating these differences and at identifying the appropriate follow-up and the possible benefit from the use of prophylactic acetylsalicylic acid during pregnancy in RP are necessary.

References

[1]Liu E et al. Arch Rheumatol., 2017.

[2]Al Arfaj A et al. Lupus. 2010.

Table 1.

Analysis of obstetrical outcomes

Primary RP (pRP)RP-UCTDUCTDHCp-valueMiscarriagesN. (%)35 (33%)17 (19%)30 (31%)15 (16%)p=0,017vs pRPreferencep=0,051p=0,750p=0,006Median weight at birth(IQR), gr3038 (2710-3500)3180 (2935 - 3465)3157 (2910 - 3610)3358 (3195 - 3583)p=0,02vs pRPreferencep=0,3473p=0,1542p=0,0002Birthweight < 10th percentileN. (%)15 (21%)7 (10%)5 (8%)2 (3%)p=0,002vs pRPreferencep=0,087p=0,03p=<0,001

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

OP0161 TREATMENT PATTERNS OF IDIOPATHIC INFLAMMATORY MYOPATHIES: RESULTS FROM AN INTERNATIONAL COHORT OF OVER 1,400 PATIENTS

Background

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a group of heterogeneous autoimmune disorders with limited standardization of treatment protocols.

Objectives

To evaluate frequency and patterns of various treatments used for IIM based on disease subtype, world region, and organ involvement.

Methods

Cross-sectional data from the international CoVAD self-report e-survey1 was extracted on Sep 14th, 2021. Patient details included demographics, IIM subtypes (dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), inclusion body myositis (IBM), antisynthetase syndrome (ASSD), necrotizing myositis (NM) and overlap myositis (OM)), clinical symptoms, disease duration and activity, and current treatments. Treatments were categorized in corticosteroids (CS), antimalarials, immunosuppressants (IS), intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), biologics, and others. Typical clinical symptoms (dyspnea, dysphagia) were used as surrogate for organ involvement. Factors associated with IS were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for IIM subtype, demographics, world region, disease activity, and prevalent clinical symptoms (>10%).

Results

In 1418 patients with IIM, median age was 61 years [IQR 49-70], 62.5% were females, median disease duration was 6 years [IQR 3-11], most common subset was DM (32.4%).

The most used treatments were IS (49.4%, including Methotrexate 19.6%, Mycophenolate Mofetil 18.2%, Azathioprine 8.8%, Cyclosporine 2.7%, Tacrolimus 2%, Leflunomide 1.6%, Sulfasalazine 1%, and Cyclophosphamide 0.6%), followed by CS (40.8%), antimalarials (13.8%) and IVIG (9.4%). Biologics were used in 4.3% of patients.

Treatment patterns differed significantly by IIM subtypes with a higher frequency of IS (77.7%) and CS (63.4%) use in ASSD; antimalarials (28.6%) and biologics (9.8%) use in OM and IVIG use in NM (24.6%) (Table 1). Also, treatment patterns were different in regions of the world (Figure 1), with a higher frequency of CS use in Europe (60.5%) and IS use in South America (77.2%). Antimalarials were most used in Asia (19.4%), while IVIG use was most common in Oceania (16.9%). Dyspnea was associated with higher use of IS (69.9%) and CS (65.8%) (p<0.001), whereas dysphagia was negatively associated with IS (39.7%) and CS (32.7%) likely due to a higher proportion in IBM patients reporting dysphagia.

Table 1.

Current Treatments for IIM, Stratified by Disease Subtypes

DermatomyositisPolymyositisInclusion Body MyositisAnti-synthetase syndromeNecrotizing myositisOverlap syndromeAll IIMp-valueNumber of patients459182348148572241418Immunosuppressants*269 (58.6)107 (58.8)39 (11.2)115 (77.7)40 (70.2)130 (58.0)700 (49.4)<0.001Corticosteroids208 (48.0)81 (46.8)32 (9.7)90 (63.4)32 (59.3)103 (50.0)546 (40.8)<0.001Antimalarials99 (21.6)7 (3.8)0 (0.0)25 (16.9)1 (1.8)64 (28.6)196 (13.8)<0.001Intravenous Immunoglobulins54 (11.8)16 (8.8)19 (5.5)10 (6.8)14 (24.6)20 (8.9)133 (9.4)<0.001Biologics**17 (3.7)7 (3.8)0 (0.0)13 (8.8)2 (3.5)22 (9.8)61 (4.3)<0.001Others***6 (1.3)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (0.7)0 (0.0)5 (2,2)12 (0.8)0.098

*Methotrexate (278), Mycophenolate Mofetil (258), Azathioprine (125), Cyclosporine (38), Tacrolimus (28), Leflunomide (23), Sulfasalazine (14), Cyclophosphamide (9)

. **Rituximab (44), Abatacept (5), TNF inhibitors (4), Tocilizumab (3), Belimumab (3), Secukinumab (1)

. ***JAK(10) and PDE4 inhibitors (2)

Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed an association of IS with the IIM subtype (least used in IBM (OR 0.07 [95%CI 0.04-0.13] compared to DM), world region (most used in South America (OR 2.35 [1.12-4.91] compared to North America), active and worsening disease activity (OR 3.49 [1.76-6.91] compared to remission), and some clinical features (dyspnea, fatigue, and muscle weakness).

Conclusion

IIM treatment patterns differ significantly by disease subtypes, world regions and organ involvement, highlighting the need for unified international consensus-driven guidelines.

References

[1]Parikshit S. et al. Rheumatol Int. 2022 Jan;42(1):23–9.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0140 ROLE OF ENDOGLIN IN THE PATHOGENESIS OF SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS: A PRISMA-DRIVEN SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Background

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized from peculiar vascular alteration and fibrosis of the skin and internal tissues. SSc pathogenetic mechanisms are still partially unclear but an involvement of the TGFβ pathway, known for being responsible of both angiogenesis and fibrosis, has been proven. Endoglin (ENG) is a TGFβ receptor type III involved in signal regulation, and mutations in ENG gene cause Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia type I, a rare disease that shares with SSc the presence of mucocutaneous telangiectasias and disturbed angiogenesis.

Objectives

The aim of this systematic review is to highlight the role of ENG in the pathogenesis of SSc focusing on a subset of clinical manifestations.

Methods

We performed a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines, searching the MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science and EMBASE databases using as keywords: “Endoglin”, “sENG”, “CD105”, “Systemic sclerosis”, “SSc”, “Scleroderma”, “CREST”. The last search was made on November 2nd 2021. This review includes both conference abstracts (without subsequent publication) and articles that evaluated the relationships between SSc and ENG; we excluded the papers that used CD105 only as a cell marker. We then consulted the references from the papers found in order to search possible articles that escaped our first search.

Results

Of the 656 records identified from the database research, 42 were included in our systematic review (16 abstracts and 26 original papers) (Figure). The majority of these studies (25) measured serum ENG (sENG) looking for correlations with cutaneous, pulmonary and cardiac disease in patients with SSc.

Figure.

 PRISMA flow diagram.

High levels of sENG demonstrated an independent association with telangiectasia in 2 studies, with the presence of digital ulcers (DU) in 6 studies but was not related to the occurrence of new DU (2 studies) and it was related to scleroderma pattern late in 2 studies. Between limited and diffuse cutaneous SSc, sENG showed no differences in one study and significantly higher values in lcSSc in another, this latter study also found sENG to be higher in lcSSC compared to systemic lupus erythematous and healthy controls (HC). sENG, moreover, demonstrated a positive correlation with anti-centromere antibodies (two studies). Regarding pulmonary involvement, no correlation between sENG and mean pulmonary arterial pressure was recorded, and two studies found sENG elevated in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension while no correlation was found from two other papers. High sENG concentrations demonstrated a positive correlation with subclinical atherosclerosis and with high sensitivity troponin, but its concentration did not relate to right heart dysfunction (1 study each). Two different groups evaluated sENG concentration in Localized Scleroderma and found no differences with other connective tissue diseases. One study searched for genetic alterations in the expression of ENG gene and found no difference between SSc patients and HC. Four studies evaluated Eng expression on fibroblast surface: SSc fibroblasts from both systemic circulation and lung showed higher production of Eng than HC. Tissue Eng, moreover, is up regulated in SSc patients where it acts as a regulator of TGFβ signaling and of extracellular matrix production.

Conclusion

As suggested by the role of Endoglin in the TGFβ pathway, several authors demonstrated an altered expression of Endoglin in SSc patients. A particular focus of interest is the role of ENG in PAH and DU that occur in SSc. A direct involvement of ENG in PAH is known as mutation in this gene are one of the genetic causes of PAH. However, particularly in pulmonary vascular disease, there are still controversial and insufficient data to draw definitive conclusions. As PAH is a leading cause of mortality in SSc patients this is an area of clinical interest and the study of the TGFβ pathway could lead to useful clinical findings.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0426 CIRCULATING MICRORNA PROFILING IN PATIENTS WITH ANTI-SYNTHETASE SYNDROME AND INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE

Background:

Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD) is an autoimmune disease characterized by autoantibodies against one of many aminoacyl transfer RNA (tRNA) synthetases. Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) in ASSD patients is frequent, often severe and rapidly progressive, causing much of the increased morbidity and mortality associated with ASSD as compared to other idiopathic inflammatory myopathies [1].

Objectives:

In this study, we hypothesized that immune-related miRNAs may be associated with presence/absence of lung involvement in patients with ASSD and help predict disease course.

Methods:

A total of 15 ASSD patients were enrolled: 11 with ILD and 4 without ILD. Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified in plasma derived-exosome, using miRNA PCR array (MIHS-111ZG, Qiagen) including 84 miRNAs involved in activation and differentiation of T and B cells.

Results:

Among all miRNAs analyzed we found that miR-15b-5p, miR-23a-3p, miR-25-3p, miR-30a-5p and miR29c-3p were up-regulated in ASSD-ILD patients (p<0.05) as compared to patients without lung involvement (Figure 1). To evaluate the effectiveness of the five miRNAs for predicting ILD among ASSD patients, ROC curves were constructed. The AUCs of miR-15b-5p, miR-25-3p, miR-30a-5p and miR29c-3p were 0.83, 0.87, 0.86 and 0.89, respectively (p= 0.05 for miR-25-3p and p<0.05 for all other curves). The prediction of the biologic targets and pathways as well as cellular processes by DIANA-mirPath analysis showed that all miRNAs associated with ILD presence are involved in PI3K-Akt signaling pathway.

Conclusion:

Our study shows that, in ASSD patients with ILD, miR-15b-5p, miR-23a-3p, miR-25-3p, miR-30a-5p and miR29c-3p were up-regulated compared to patients without evidence of ILD. A clear involvement in immune and inflammatory diseases was documented for the miRNAs identified [2] and, for many of these, studies in the literature indicate a possible role in pulmonary fibrosis [3]. It is notable that these miRNAs were related to PI3K-Akt signaling pathway that regulate cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis [4]. It has also been demonstrated that in lung fibroblast the PI3K–Akt signals can be aberrantly activated [5]. The identification of markers could be important in the early identification of the disease and for its treatment.

References:

[1]Kalluri M, Oddis CV. Pulmonary manifestations of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Clinics in chest medicine. 2010; 31:501–512.

[2]Prabahar A, Natarajan J, ImmunemiR-a database of prioritized immune miRNA disease associations and its interactome. MicroRNA, 2017; 6: 71–78.

[3]Sessa R, Hata A. Role of microRNAs in lung development and pulmonary diseases. Pulm Circ. 2013; 3:315-28.

[4]Ersahin T, Tuncbag N, Cetin-Atalay R. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR interactive pathway. Mol Biosyst. 2015;11:1946-54.

[5]Zhang XL, Xing RG, Chen L, Liu CR, Miao ZG. PI3K/Akt signaling is involved in the pathogenesis of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis via regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Mol Med Rep. 2016;14:5699-5706.

Figure 1.

Comparison of relative levels of five miRNAs among patients with and without lung involvement were expressed as log2 transformed values. *p<0.05; **p<0.01

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS1406 DEVELOPMENT OF A DIAGNOSTIC ALGORITHM FOR THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE: PRELIMINARY DATA FROM A MULTICENTER RETROSPECTIVE CASE-CONTROL STUDY

Background:

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) represent a heterogeneous group of disorders with different treatment and prognosis. ILD may be the presenting or the dominant manifestation of a connective tissue disease (CTD). Multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion is currently the diagnostic standard. However, there is no consensus on how MDT diagnosis is validated and on the core elements of discussion.

Objectives:

To explore the performance of a diagnostic algorithm for the differential diagnosis of ILD based on clinical, serological and radiological data, supporting clinician decision-making.

Methods:

In this retrospective study, analysis was performed on clinical, serological and radiological features at diagnosis and 1-year follow-up in 71 patients, including 41 with CTD-ILD and 30 with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs). In order to identify robust hallmarks, we conducted the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses in logistic regression, to discriminate significantly different features between CTD-ILD and non-CTD-ILD groups.

Results:

Out of 71 patients 46% were women, with a mean age of 66±11 years. History of smoking (8.8% current and 39.8% former smokers), was more associated with IIPs. 54% of patients had dyspnea on exertion and 39% dry cough, both more frequently associated with IIPs (p = 0.016). Among radiological features, NSIP pattern was more frequent in CTD-ILD, while UIP was associated with IIP. Lung fibrosis extent was greater in IIP (p = 0.063), in which CT is generally performed in symptomatic patients at diagnosis and rarely for screening purpose. Baseline features with good performance (OR p-value ≤ 0.05) were eligible as potential candidate discriminators: age, sex, smoking habit, rheumatological signs and symptoms, autoantibodies, ILD patterns were selected, to build a multivariate model with high discrimination accuracy (AUC 0.971). The model has a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 89.7%. The most relevant correlations between population features and CTD-ILD are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Correlation analysis of the most significant discriminative features.

FeaturesOdds ratioP valueArea under ROC curveSex (female)3.290.019*0.643Age0.910.001*0.736Smoke0.12<0.001*0.738Respiratory symptoms (dyspnea and/or dry cough)0.260.016*0.644Rheumatological symptoms (any)28.8<0.001*0.839 • Raynaud’s phenomenon15.040.0110.654 • Cutaneous manifestations8.160.0530.593Autoantibodies (ANA, ENA, RF, ACPA, myositis-specific antibodies or aPL) positivity33.68<0.001*0.792Lung function test • Forced vital capacity (%FVC)0.970.1750.638 • Diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (%DLCO)0.960.0720.665High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) imaging • Honeycombing0.340.0680.593 • Emphysema0.140.005*0.647 • Extent of lung involvement (%)0.970.0630.668HRCT pattern • NSIP vs UIP30.033*0.625

Abbreviations: ANA, antinuclear antibody; ENA, extractable nuclear antigen; RF, rheumatoid factor; ACPA, anti-citrullinated peptide antibody; aPL, antiphospholipid antibody; NSIP, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia; UIP, usual interstitial pneumonia.

Conclusion:

Our study shows that the most important variables in the differential diagnosis between CTD-ILD versus IIPs include, as expected, autoimmune features (rheumatological symptoms and serological data). Questionnaire tool containing these specific hallmarks may be relevant during MDT discussion, limiting the number of misdiagnosed CTD-ILDs and potentially avoiding further unnecessary investigations. However, only prospective cohort studies of early onset ILD are needed to fully validate the relative importance of clinical, serological, functional and radiological data.

References:

[1]Furini F. et al, The Role of the Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review of the Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019; 6: 246.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

SAT0306 SEMIQUANTITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF LUNG CT IN THE ASSESSMENT OF INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE IN IDIOPATHIC INFLAMMATORY MYOPATHIES WITH A FOCUS ON ANTISYNTHETASE

Background:

Interstitial lung disease (ILD), is common in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) and strongly impact on patients’ morbidity and mortality. Patients with anti-aminoacyl-transfer RNA-synthetases (anti-ARS) antibodies are associated with an increased risk of ILD.

Objectives:

Defining the radiological characteristics of IIM patients, with special focus on serological groups, through qualitative, semiquantitative and quantitative analysis of lung CT.

Methods:

This was a prospective study conducted from 2016 to 2019. Ninety-eight IIM patients (35 men, 63 women) were included. Myositis specific autoantibodies (MSA) were assessed with Myositis Prophyle III (Euroimmune, Lubeck).

Each patient had a baseline CT; the total score of Warrick (WS) was obtained at semiquantitative analysis. The radiological scores ILD% (interstitial lung disease %) and PVRS% (pulmonary vascular related structure) were the result of quantitative analysis in 61 patients (CALIPER). Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) included TLC%, FVC% and DLCO% (65 patients). The analysis was conducted in the whole group and divided in subgroups based on their MSA pattern: in particular anti-ARS (Group 1) and patients negative to MSA (Group 2) were analysed.

Results:

Positive correlations between ILD% and PVRS% (Rho=0.916; ρ=0.000), WS and ILD% (Rho=0.663; ρ=0.000) and WS and PVRS% (Rho=0.637; ρ<0.001) were found.

The most relevant inverse correlations were found between ILD% and DLCO% (Rho=-0.590; ρ=0.001), PVRS% and DLCO% (Rho=-0.549; ρ<0.001) and WS and DLCO% (Rho=-0.471; ρ<0.001).

Statistically significant higher values of WS, ILD% and PVRS% were found in Group 1 (WS=15, ILD%=11 and PVRS%=3.5), compared to Group 2 (WS=2.5, ILD%=0.84 and PVRS%=2.2). NSIP pattern resulted dominant represented in the two groups (80% Group 1, 75% Group 2). No statistically significant differences of DLCO%, FVC% and TLCO% were found.

Conclusion:

The inverse correlations between the radiological scores and the functional data TLC% and DLCO% (ρ<0.001) confirm the role of lung CT in the clinical management of ILD in IIM patients, and may represent a promising tool for clinical trials. For the first time anti-ARS and serological negative patients were defined through qualitative, semiquantitative and quantitative analysis of lung CT. Further study should be conducted in order to define the prognostic value of the quantitative analysis of lung CT in the follow up of IIM patients.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

SAT0348 CLINICAL SPECTRUM TIME COURSE OF ANTISYNTHETASE SYNDROME PATIENTS POSITIVE FOR ANTICENTROMERE ANTIBODIES

Background:

ASSD is characterized by antisynthetase antibodies (ARS) and the triad arthritis/myositis/Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD). ASSD and systemic sclerosis (SSc) may share features, like Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP), capillaroscopic alterations, and also some SSc specific autoantibodies.

Objectives:

To evaluate the characteristics of ASSD + for anticentromere antibodies (ACA).

Methods:

Retrospective analysis of clinical and laboratory characteristics of ACA + ASSD. Patients were identified in an established international cohort, randomly matched 1:1 for sex, age, disease duration and ARS positivity with a group of ACA - ASSD.

Results:

18 ACA + ASSD (15 females, 83%, 15 anti-Jo1, 2 anti-PL7, 1 anti-PL12 ARS) patients were identified. In comparison to ACA - group, no differences were observed in disease clinical presentation and evolution. Though, 9 ACA + patients (50%) satisfied the ACR/EULAR 2013 classification criteria for SSc and only 1 in ACA - group (p=0.007) (Table 1).

An incomplete ASSD (lack of at least one triad finding) was observed in 15 patients in both ACA + and – group (p=1). Among these patients, 13 ACA + and 11 ACA – developed de-novo triad finding during disease course (p=0.651). In ACA + group, a de-novo arthritis was observed in 4 patients (vs 1, p=0.565), a de-novo myositis in 8 (vs 5, p=1), and a de-novo ILD in 7 (vs 10, p=1). The prevalence of complete forms was similar between ACA + and – group at both disease onset (3 vs 3, 17%, p=1) and last follow-up, (10 vs 11, 56% vs 61%, p=1). Of note, only 1 patient (6%) for each group died (p=1).

Conclusion:

The clinical spectrum time course of ACA+ and - ASSD is similar, even when ACA + patients could be classified as SSc. By considering the high prevalence of arthritis and myositis we observed, we suggest that ACA+ patients with arthritis and myositis, should be tested for ARS antibodies even when an ASSD is not clearly suspected.

References:

[1]Mirrakhimov AE. Curr Med Chem 2015;22:1963–75

[2]Cavagna L. J Clin Med 2019;8:E2013

[3]Sebastiani M. J Rheum 2019:46:279-84

[4]van den Hoogen F. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1747-55

Table 1.

Patients characteristics. IQR, interquartile range; ILD, interstitial Lung Disease; SSc, systemic sclerosis

ACA+ (18)ACA - (18)pAge (years) at disease onset (median, IQR)47 (37-63)47 (39-63)0.834Disease duration (months) (median, IQR)81 (62-169)77 (58-165)0.486anti Ro52antibody (%)12(67)11 (61)1Arthritis onset10 (56)13 (72)0.489Arthritis last follow-up (%)14 (78)14 (78%)1Myositis onset (%)7 (39)11 (61)0.318Myositis last follow-up (%)15 (83)16 (89)1ILD onset (%)9 (50)6 (33)0.5ILD last follow-up (%)16 (89)16 (89)1Complete form onset (%)3 (17)3 (17)1Complete form last follow-up (%)10 (56)11 (61)1Raynaud phenomenon (%)13 (72)9 (50)0.305Mechanic’s hands (%)6 (33)7 (38)1Teleangectasias (%)2 (11)0 (0)0.486Cutaneous sclerosis (%)510.177Acral ulcers (%)1 (6)0 (0)1Scleroderma pattern at NVC8 (44)7 (39)1Pulmonary arterial hypertension (%)3 (17)2 (11)12013 ACR/EULAR SSc classification criteria9 (50)1 (6)0.007

Disclosure of Interests:

Giovanni Zanframundo: None declared, Gianluca Sambataro: None declared, Veronica Codullo: None declared, Alessandro Biglia: None declared, Emanuele Bozzalla Cassione: None declared, Elena Bravi: None declared, Florenzo Iannone Consultant of: Speaker and consulting fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, MSD, Speakers bureau: Speaker and consulting fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, MSD, Marco Fornaro: None declared, Konstantinos Triantafyllias: None declared, Alberto Pesci: None declared, Paola Tomietto: None declared, Øyvind Molberg: None declared, Salvatore Scarpato: None declared, Reinhard Voll: None declared, Marco Matucci-Cerinic Grant/research support from: Actelion, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Speakers bureau: Acetelion, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Carlomaurizio Montecucco: None declared, Lorenzo Cavagna: None declared

AB0555 ANTI-RO POSITIVITY EFFECT ON CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND MORTALITY IN A SINGLE-CENTER COHORT OF ANTISYNTHETASE SYNDROME PATIENTS

Background:

Antisynthetase syndrome (ASSD) is an heterogeneous disease characterized by the occurrence of anti-synthetase antibodies (ARS) and the classic triad of arthritis, myositis and Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD). Pulmonary involvment bears an increased risk of life threatening events, being the main cause of mortality in these patients. No significant differences in mortality have been noticed among the different ARS specificities. However the role of extractable nuclear antigen antibodies on mortality in these patients is still matter of debate.

Objectives:

To asses the effect of anti-RO antibodies on clinical characteristics and mortality in a large italian single-center cohort of ASSD patients.

Methods:

Cohort study of outcome, clinical and laboratory characteristics, at baseline and at last follow-up, of 55 ASSD patients progressively enrolled and followed-up at our out-patient clinic. Survival was estimated with Kaplan-Meier function and comparison between frequencies of clinical characteristics was studied with Chi-square test.

Results:

We identified 30 anti-Ro+ (M:F=1:4) and 25 anti-Ro- (M:F=1.5:1) ASSD patients. No difference in the age of onset was observed (p value=0.83). Classic triad prevalence and evolution was similar between the two groups with only significant difference of ILD prevalence at last follow up, higher in anti-Ro+ patients group (p value=0.01). Overall mortality was of 13 subjects (23%) during the follow-up period (median 53 months, IQR 16-114). Despite the significantly higher pulmonary involvment in the anti-Ro+ group no difference between mortality in anti-Ro positive and negative groups was observed. Adjusting mortality to include disease-related events only did not provide any additional difference (p value=0.5) (Table 1). Survival curves of the two groups were not different at any time point (Log-rank test, p value 0.98) (Figure 1).

Table 1.

Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of the cohort

ASSDRo+Ro-P valuePZ (M:F)30 (6:24)25 (14:10)/Age (years) at disease onset (median, IQR)56 (43-69)54 (46-68)0.83Disease duration (months) (median, IQR)55 (23-112)52 (13-130)0.681Arhtritis at onset (%)22 (73)17 (68)0.664Arhtritis at last follow-up (%)26 (86)18 (72)0.175Myositis at onset (%)12(40)15 (60)1Myositis at last follow-up (%)19 (63)21 (84)0.086ILD at onset (%)20 (66)12 (48)0.162ILD at last follow-up (%)30(100)20 (80)0.01Complete form at onset (%)8 (26)4 (16)0.34Complete form at last follow-up (%)17 (56)13 (52)0.729Raynaud phenomenon (%)7 (23)8 (32)0.472Mechanic’s hands (%)12 (40)12 (48)0.551Death (%)7 (25)6 (24)0.953Disease related death (%)3 (42)4 (66)0.506Figure 1.

Kaplan-meier curve of anti-Ro+ and anti-Ro – ASSD patients.

Conclusion:

The clinical spectrum and the time course of ASSD is not significantly affected by the presence of anti-Ro antibodies, althuough ILD seems to be more associated to anti-Ro antibodies. Despite higher prevalence of

ILD in Ro positive group no difference in mortality was observed in respect to anti-Ro negative patients.

References:

[1]Cavagna L. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015 Aug;94(32):e1144

[2]Marie I. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Jun;41(6):890-9

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

THU0366 SYSTEMATIC CORONARY RISK EVALUATION (SCORE) MISCLASSIFIES CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN ANTISYNTHETASE SYNDROME: RESULTS OF THE PILOT MULTICENTRIC STUDY RI.CAR.D.A

Background:

Antisynthetase Syndrom (ASyS) is an autoimmune overlap disease characterized by antiaminoacyl-tRNA-synthetase (anti-ARS) antibodies and the classic triad of arthritis, myositis and interstitial lung disease (ILD) (1). Markers of cardiovascular (CV) or cerebrovascular (CVB) risk have never been examined in ASyS.

Objectives:

Aim of this study (RIsk of CARdiovascular Disease in ASyS: RI.CAR.D.A.) was to test the ability of an established traditional CV risk prediction score (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation-SCORE) and its EULAR modified version (mSCORE) to identify ASyS patients at high CV risk. Moreover, we sought to examine for the first time associations of CV surrogate markers with clinical and immunological ASyS parameters.

Methods:

SCORE/mSCORE and the gold standard marker of aortic stiffness (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity-cfPWV) were examined in patients with ASyS and healthy controls in a multicenter setting (6 Rheumatology Centers). Moreover, sonography of the common- (CCA), internal- (ICA) and external- (ECA) carotid arteries was performed in subsets of both groups, evaluating carotid intima-media-thickness (cIMT), plaques and duplex-sonographic indices of CBV risk such as the resistance- (RI) and pulsatility-index (PI).

Figure 1.

Carotid Doppler surrogate markers of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk in controls and ASyS (case).cIMTCarotid intima media thickness;CAA(common-),ICA(internal),ECA(external) carotid artery;RIresistance index;PIpulsatility index. (all;p< 0.05)

Results:

We recruited 66 ASyS patients with different anti-ARS and 88 controls. According to mSCORE5/50 (10%) of the patients had high CV risk. However, cfPWV and carotid sonography (CS) revealed an increased CV risk in21.2%and subclinical carotid arteriosclerosis (plaques and/or cIMT>0.9 mm) (SCA) in85.7%of the patients respectively. ROC analyses showed similarly poor diagnostic performances of SCORE/mSCORE in comparison to cfPWV(>10 m/s) and SAC by areas under the curve (AUC) of0.56 (95%CI=0.39-0.73) and0.63 (95%CI=0.3-0.96),respectively. cfPWV and SCA were higher in ASyS patients compared to controls (padj=0.021andp=0.003, respectively). cfPWV and cIMT correlated in the patient group significantly with age (r=0.679; p<0.001 and r=0.664; p<0.001,respectively).Moreover, cfPWV correlated with BMI (padj=0.001) and diabetes(padj=0.043). ACC-RI and ACC-PI showed significant associations with a marker of myositis activity [creatine phosphokinase (CPK):r=0.629;p=0.012andr=0.574;p=0.032, respectively]. Finally, ACI-RI and ACI-PI values were higher in patients with ILD (both;p=0.039).

Conclusion:

This is the first report of higher aortic stiffness and SCA in ASyS patients compared to controls. Active myositis and presence of ILD were associated with higher CVB risk parameters. Furthermore, SCORE/mSCORE performed poorly in identifying patients at high CV risk and carotid arteriosclerosis compared to cfPWV and CS respectively. Thus, cfPWV and CS could improve CV and CBV screening in ASyS patients.

References:

[1]Cavagna L, et al. Clinical Spectrum Time Course in Anti Jo-1 Positive Antisynthetase Syndrome.Medicine2015;94:1144.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

SAT0328 OUTCOME OF INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE (ILD) IN ANTI-PM/SCL PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS: RESULTS FROM AN EUSTAR CASE-CONTROL STUDY

Background:

The main clinical associations of anti-PM/Scl in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) so far reported include calcinosis, myositis and interstitial lung disease (ILD). Nevertheless, data regarding the long-term outcome of ILD in these patients are lacking. A single centre Spanish cohort reported a better functional outcome in 14 SSc-ILD patients anti-Pm/Scl+ as compared to 49 anti-Topo I after a mean follow-up of 7 years (1).

Objectives:

To analyze the long-term outcome of ILD in a large multicentre EUSTAR study dedicated to anti-Pm/Scl SSc patients.

Methods:

A case-control study within the EUSTAR cohort collected 165 anti-PM/Scl+ SSc cases and 257 anti-PM/Scl- SSc controls, matched for sex, cutaneous subset, disease duration, and age at onset. Data for ILD at HRCT were available for 162/165 cases and 249/257 controls. Data for pulmonary function tests (PFT) at the baseline (T0), 1 year after diagnosis (T1) and at the last visit (LV) were analyzed.

Results:

A significantly higher frequency of ILD was reported in anti-Pm/Scl+ cases vs anti-Pm/Scl- controls (62.3% vs 39.4%, p:<0.0001, OR 95%, CI 2.55, 1.70-3.83). Complete PFTs data were available for 81/101 ILD anti-Pm/Scl+ cases and 78/98 anti-Pm/Scl- ILD controls, with similar age at onset and female/male ratio and disease duration at LV (112±81 months vs. 115±64 months, p:0.77). Diffuse cutaneous involvement was less frequent in cases than in controls (27.2% vs. 44.9%, p:0.03).

In ILD cases, %pFVC tended to improve from T0 (85.1±18.3) to T1 (89.5±16.5, p:0.045) and to LV (87.9±16.9, p:0.057), while in ILD controls remained stable from T0 (90.4±18.5) to T1 (91.1±16.5, p:0.38) and significantly declined to LV (85.0±18.0, p:0.0002). %pDLCO remained stable from T0 (60.5±16.8) to T1 (60.1±17.6, p:0.87) and to LV (60.4±16.9, p:0.77) in ILD cases, while significantly declined from T0 (67.0±18.9) to T1 (62.7±18.2, p:0.0016) and to LV (59.6±18.4, p<0.0001) in the control group. Mean %pFVC and %pDLCO at the 3 time points were not significantly different between the two groups.

Delta %pFVC (LV-T0) was 2.85±11.3 for the anti-Pm/Scl+ group vs -5.42±13.4 in the control group (p:0.0004) with a significant smaller proportion of patients with FVC loss ≥10% from T0 to LV in the anti-PM/Scl group (12.3% vs. 39.7%, p:0.0001). Delta %pDLCO (LV-T0) was -0.13±10.8 for the anti-PM/Scl+ group vs -7.38±14.6 in the control group (p:0.0015), with a significant smaller proportion of patients with DLCO loss ≥10% from T0 to LV in the anti-PM/Scl+ group (13.6% vs. 42.3%, p<0.0001).

Conclusion:

In this multicenter real-life study, the long-term pulmonary functional outcome in SSc-ILD patients with anti-Pm/Scl positivity seems to be more favorable than in patients without anti-Pm/Scl antibodies.

References:

[1]Guillen-Del Castillo A, Semin Arthritis Rheum 2014, 44 (3), 331-7.

Disclosure of Interests: :

Maria Grazia Lazzaroni: None declared, Corrado Campochiaro Speakers bureau: Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, GSK, SOBI, Emiliano Marasco: None declared, Jeska de Vries-Bouwstra: None declared, Franco Franceschini: None declared, Francesco Del Galdo: None declared, Christopher Denton Grant/research support from: GlaxoSmithKline, CSL Behring, and Inventiva, Consultant of: Medscape, Roche-Genentech, Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Aventis, Inventiva, CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Acceleron, Curzion and Bayer, Lorenzo Cavagna: None declared, Oliver Distler Grant/research support from: Grants/Research support from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Competitive Drug Development International Ltd. and Mitsubishi Tanabe; he also holds the issued Patent on mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (US8247389, EP2331143)., Consultant of: Consultancy fees from Actelion, Acceleron Pharma, AnaMar, Bayer, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Boehringer, CSL Behring, Catenion, ChemomAb, Curzion Pharmaceuticals, Ergonex, Galapagos NV, GSK, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, Italfarmaco, iQvia, medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Roche, Sanofi and UCB, Speakers bureau: Speaker fees from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medscape, Pfizer and Roche, Yannick Allanore Grant/research support from: BMS, Inventiva, Roche, Sanofi, Consultant of: Actelion, Bayer AG, BMS, BI, Paolo Airò: None declared

FRI0239 ANTI-NXP2 ANTIBODIES: CLINICAL AND SEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATIONS IN A MULTICENTRIC ITALIAN STUDY

Background:

anti-NXP2 antibodies is considered a serological marker of dermatomyositis (DM), with calcinosis, severe myositis and, in some series, cancer. Historically, these associations have been detected with immunoprecipitation (IP), but in the last few years commercial lineblot (LB) assay have been released.

Objectives:

to analyze the clinical features associated to anti-NXP2 antibodies, including the onset of concomitant cancers, both with LB and homemade IP

Methods:

clinical and serological data from medical charts of 213 patients with a diagnosis of inflammatory miosidites without anti-NXP2 (NXP2-), followed-up by two third-level Centers, and 61 anti-NXP2+ patients from 10 Rheumatological centers were analyzed. Anti-myositis specific (MSA) and anti-myositis associated antibodies (MAA) were detected in single centers by LB (Euroimmun Autoimmune Inflammatory Myopathies 16 antigens). Anti-NXP2 was confirmed by protein and RNA IP, as previously described (1)

Results:

clinical diagnosis of anti-NXP2+ positive with LB were 42 DM, 11 PM, inclusion body myositis (IBM) 4, necrotizing myositis and overlap (OM) 1 each. Anti-NXP2+ showed a lower age at onset (p<0.0001) more frequent diagnosis of DM (68.8%vs30%,OR5.2) and IBM (6.5%vs0.49%,OR14.8), typical skin manifestations, myositis (93%vs79% OR3.3), concomitant presence of another MSA (12.7%vs2%, OR6.41) and lower rate of features associated with OM or anti-synthetase syndrome. Serum from 49 NXP2+ was available and IP analysis was made with the confirmation of NXP2 in 31 sera (63.2%) with the following diagnosis: DM 27 cases, PM 3, IBM 1. Whilst the majority of the associations were confirmed comparing NXP2LB+/IP+ with the IIM NXP2-, some peculiar associations were found significant only for the double positive patients: dysphagia (53%vs 30%,OR 2.56) and calcinosis (22%vs6.5% OR4) whereas IBM diagnosis and the presence of concomitant MSA antibodies were lost. Survival time from cancer onset is shown in figure.

IP did not confirmed anti-NXP2 antibodies in 18 sera: in 4 cases at least one MSA/MAA was identified by IP; these 18 patients did not show differences when compared with 213 anti-NXP2-.

Conclusion:

Protein IP confirmed anti-NXP2 antibodies in 63% of LB+ sera. Double positive cases showed more typical DM features and rarely occurred in IIM not DM. Anti-NXP2 positivity by LB should be confirmed by other methods in order to correctly diagnose and characterize IIM patients.

References:

[1]Arthritis Res Ther 2012,30;14:R97

Acknowledgments:

Forum Italiano per la Ricerca Malattie Autoimmuni (FIRMA)

Disclosure of Interests:

Micaela Fredi: None declared, Ilaria Cavazzana: None declared, Angela Ceribelli: None declared, Maria Grazia Lazzaroni: None declared, Simone Barsotti: None declared, Maurizio Benucci: None declared, Lorenzo Cavagna: None declared, Ludovico De Stefano: None declared, Andrea Doria Consultant of: GSK, Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, Ely Lilly, Speakers bureau: UCB pharma, GSK, Pfizer, Janssen, Abbvie, Novartis, Ely Lilly, BMS, Giacomo Emmi: None declared, Marco Fornaro: None declared, Federica Furini: None declared, Roberto Gerli: None declared, Maria Grazia Giudizi: None declared, Marcello Govoni: None declared, Anna Ghirardello: None declared, Luca Iaccarino Speakers bureau: GSK, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Florenzo Iannone Consultant of: Speaker and consulting fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, MSD, Speakers bureau: Speaker and consulting fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, MSD, Maria Infantino: None declared, Alessandro Mathieu: None declared, Emiliano Marasco: None declared, Paola Migliorini: None declared, Boaz Palterer: None declared, paola parronchi: None declared, Matteo Piga: None declared, Federico Pratesi: None declared, Antonella Radice: None declared, Carlo Selmi: None declared, Valeria Riccieri: None declared, Marilin Tampoia: None declared, Giovanni Zanframundo: None declared, Angela Tincani: None declared, Franco Franceschini: None declared

THU0344 CLINICAL AND HISTOLOGICAL SPECTRUM OF ANTI-MI2 DERMATOMYOSITIS: A MULTICENTRE RETROSPECTIVE COHORT

Background:

Dermatomyositis (DM) shows a wide clinical spectrum that seems to be different based on the type of autoantibody status. Furthermore, less is known regarding to the histopathology of different serological subsets of DM

Objectives:

The aim of our study was to investigate clinical and histopathological hallmarks in adult DM patients positive for anti-Mi2 (Mi2+) antibody compared to DM patients negative for anti-Mi2 (Mi2-)

Methods:

All clinical data of adult DM patients admitted in three tertiary Rheumatology Units, who fulfilled EULAR/ACR 2017 classification criteria1, were included in this study. Overlap syndrome and antisynthetase syndrome were exclusion criterion. Serum samples were tested in the local reference laboratories using line immunoassays methods for Myositis specific and associated antibodies. Histopathological study was carried out from muscle biopsies performed for diagnostic purpose in outpatient clinic of Bari (Italy) University. Quantitative analysis was performed for myofiber and capillary features, whereas semi-quantitative analysis (score from 0 to 3) was performed for inflammatory cells infiltrate, both at endomysial and perimysial sites

Results:

A total of 95 DM patients, followed for a median (IQR) follow-up of 28 (9-85) months, were analyzed. Of these, 23 (24.2%) patients (87% female, mean age at onset 55.4±16.2 years) were anti-Mi2+, while 72 (75.8%) patients were Mi2- (72.2% female, mean age at onset 55.2±17 years). All Mi2+ patients showed muscle involvement. Moreover, Mi2+ DM showed higher levels of serum creatine kinase (CK) at onset compared to Mi2- (CK (IQR): 2649 UI/l (1130-6000) vs 575 UI/l (164-1617), p<0.001). Prevalence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) was lower in Mi2+ patients (8.7% vs 30.6%, p=0.05), and no case of rapidly progressive ILD (RP-ILD) was found. Survival analysis at 5-years follow-up highlighted good survival for Mi2+ patients, but not different from Mi2- (95.7% vs 83.1%, p=0.151). Multivariate analysis showed that age at onset (HR:1.07), RP-ILD (HR:36.2) and cancer associated myositis (HR:6.1) correlated with a poor prognosis. Finally, a total of 26 biopsies (12 Mi2+ and 14 Mi2-) were included into the histological analysis showing higher prevalence of necrotic/degenerating myofibers (median (IQR) 2.6 (0.7-11)% vs 0.6 (0.4-1.1)%, p=0.009) and sarcoplasmic deposit of membrane attack complex (MAC) (median (IQR) 0.2 (0-1.2)% vs (0(0-0)%,p=0.009) in Mi2+ patients. In addition, the endomysial macrophage score was higher in Mi-2+ patients (median 1.5 (0.25-2) vs (0.5 (0-1), p=0.031)

Conclusion:

Mi2+ patients represent a specific DM subset with higher muscle damage, sarcoplasmic MAC deposits and endomysial macrophages infiltration as histological hallmarks

References:

[1]Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Dec;76(12):1955-1964

Disclosure of Interests:

Marco Fornaro: None declared, Francesco Girolamo: None declared, Lorenzo Cavagna: None declared, Franco Franceschini: None declared, margherita giannini: None declared, Giovanni Zanframundo: None declared, Micaela Fredi: None declared, Marilin Tampoia: None declared, Angela Amati: None declared, Luigi Serlenga: None declared, Anna Lia: None declared, Liala Moschetti: None declared, Dario Dabbicco: None declared, Laura Coladonato: None declared, Florenzo Iannone Consultant of: Speaker and consulting fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, MSD, Speakers bureau: Speaker and consulting fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, MSD

FRI0260 NAILFOLD VIDEOCAPILLAROSCOPY IS A USEFUL TOOL TO RECOGNIZE SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS AND IDIOPATHIC INFLAMMATORY MYOPATHIES IN INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE PATIENTS

Background:

Nailfold Videocapillaroscopy (NVC) is an essential tool for the assessment of Raynaud’s Phenomenon (RP) among the Scleroderma Spectrum Disorders (SSDs). Recently, NVC abnormalities have been associated with a diagnosis of Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies (IIMs), independently of the presence of RP (1). Moreover, both SSDs and IIMs are commonly associated with Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD), which is the main cause of mortality in these conditions.

Objectives:

To verify whether NVC may allow a better diagnostic classification in a cohort of patients with ILD followed by pulmonologists.

Methods:

361 patients affected by ILD were prospectively enrolled in a 30-months observational study. All these patients were clinically evaluated by rheumatologists and pulmonologists together and performed general blood tests, autoantibody research, chest High-Resolution Computed Tomography and NVC. The latter was considered positive in the presence of avascular areas or giant capillaries, and also the presence of Bushy Capillaries (BCs) was recorded.

Results:

NVC was positive in 17.7% of ILD patients, and a third of these patients did not present RP. Patients with NVC abnormalities had a diagnosis of definite Connective Tissue Disease in 78.1% of cases. NVC resulted decisive in 25% of patients with a final diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis according to the ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria. The presence of BCs and/or NVC+ in ILD patients with normal serum levels of muscular enzymes was associated with amyopathic IIM (BCs= OR 3.9, 95CI 1.05-14.38, p=0.04; NVC+= OR 5, 95CI 1.29-19.3 p=0.02; BCs and/or NVC+= OR 5.41 95CI 1.24-23.48 p=0.02), regardless the presence of RP.

Conclusion:

NVC proved to be a valid tool in the correct assessment of ILD patients secondary to SSDs and amyopathic IIMs. Therefore, it could be considered in the diagnostic evaluation of patients affected by ILD, regardless of the presence of RP.

References:

[1]Sebastiani M et al. Nailfold Capillaroscopy Characteristics of Antisynthetase Syndrome and possible clinical associations: results of a multicenter International Study.J Rheumatol2019; 46: 279-284

Table 1.

Comparison between ILD patients with and without NVC positivity.

.ItemsNVC+ patientsNVC- patientspNumber64297Mean Age (±SD)61.4±13.367.8±9.80.001Female%65.649.10.01RP%68.717.1<0.0001HRCT patterns%NSIP51.536.80.02OP3.18n.s.UIP-like31.1544.8n.s.DIP1.53.4n.s.LIP1.50.4n.s.Indeterminate10.96.7n.s.Final Diagnosis%SSDs45.31<0.0001IIMs256.4<0.0001Other CTDs6.213.5n.s.IPAF10.919.5n.s.IPF7.827.90.0007

Legend:DIP: Desquamative Interstitial Pneumonia; HRCT: High Resolution Computed Tomography; IIMs: Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies, Poly/dermatomyositis, antisynthetase syndrome; IPAF: Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features; IPF: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis; LIP: Lymphocytic Interstitial Pneumonia; NSIP: Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia; OP: Organising Pneumonia; RP: Raynaud’s Phenomenon; SSDs: Scleroderma Spectrum Disorders, Systemic Sclerosis + Mixed Connective Tissue Disease; UIP: Usual Interstitial Pneumonia.

Disclosure of Interests:

Gianluca Sambataro: None declared, Domenico Sambataro: None declared, Francesca Pignataro: None declared, Nicoletta Del Papa: None declared, Michele Colaci: None declared, Lorenzo Malatino: None declared, Alessandro Libra: None declared, Fabio Pino: None declared, Sebastiano Emanuele Torrisi Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Stefano Palmucci Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Delphi International Srl, and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Lorenzo Cavagna: None declared, Carlo Vanchieri Grant/research support from: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., and Menarini, Speakers bureau: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., and Menarini

OP0009 DERIVATION AND VALIDATION OF THE SCLERODERMA LUNG 3-STAGE INDEX (SL3SI), A NEW FUNCTIONAL INDEX FOR INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE WITH PROGNOSTIC IMPLICATIONS

Background:

The staging of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is important to monitor disease progression and for prognostication. A disease severity scale of Systemic Sclerosis (SSc)-related lung disease has long been proposed (i.e. Medsger’s severity scale). This scale was mostly developed by discussion and consensus and stage thresholds were not computed by a data-driven approach. Hidden Markov models (HMM) are methods to estimate population quantities for chronic diseases with a staged interpretation which are diagnosed by markers measured at irregular intervals.

Objectives:

To build a SSc-ILD specific disease severity scale with prognostic relevance via HMM modeling.

Methods:

A total of 358 SSc patients at risk for or with ILD were enrolled in a discovery (207 cases, Milan1) and in a validation (151 cases, Milan2, Pavia and Rome) cohort. Patients were included if satisfied the following criteria: 1) Diagnosis of SSc according to the EULAR/ACR 2013 criteria, 2) absence of anticentromere antibodies, 3) dcSSc subset or 4) other subsets with either 4a) ILD-related antibodies (Scl70, PmScl, Ku) or 4b) evidence of ILD on HRCT, 5) disease duration < 5 years at the time of the first pulmonary function test (PFT). Serial PFTs were retrieved and the time up to the last available visit -if the patient alive-, or to death due to pulmonary complications, was recorded. HMM were used to estimate the threshold of a 3-stage model (SL3SI, Scleroderma Lung 3-Stage Index) based on PFT functional values (normal/mild, moderate, severe involvement) in the discovery cohort. Survival estimates of the SL3SI model were compared to Medsger’s severity classes estimates and their predictive capability evaluated via the explained residual variation (R2) of prediction errors (the higher the better). One-hundred random replicates were generated to simulate the prediction effort in patients with different disease duration and lung severity.

Results:

Patients characteristics are summarized in the Table. Fifteen-years survival estimates for Mesdger’s classes in the discovery set were: normal=0.88, mild=0.86, moderate=0.84 and severe=0.71. The SL3SI was defined by the following thresholds: normal/mild, FVC and DLco >=75%; moderate FVC or DLco 74-55%; severe, FVC or DLco <55%. SL3SI 15-yrs survival estimates were: normal/mild=0.89, moderate=0.82 and severe=0.63. Prediction analysis showed a higher R2values at 15 yrs for the SL3SI compared to Medsger’s classes, providing evidence for a better predictive capability of the former (discovery: 0.31 vs 0.25; validation: 0.28 vs 0.19).

Conclusion:

The SL3SI, a simplified 3-stage functional model of SSc-ILD, yields better survival estimates and long-term prognostic information than Medsger’s classes. Its reproducibility and ease of use make it a useful tool for the functional and prognostic evaluation of SSc patients at risk for or with ILD.

Table:VariablesDiscovery (n=207)Replication (n=151)DcSSc62 (30%)98 (64%)Age at first PFR48.6±1249.1±14.4Disease duration at first PFR1.7±1.61.3±2.4FVC90.5±18.191.1±20.2DLco70.7±19.861.3±20.1ILD on HRCT179 (86%)125 (80%)Scl70157 (76%)153 (78%)SSA63 (30%)32 (21%)n of visits38571473Follow-up time, yrs11±5.610.6±5.7Deaths27 (13%)23 (15%)

Disclosure of Interests:

Alessandro Santaniello: None declared, Chiara Bellocchi: None declared, Luca Bettolini: None declared, Marcello Cassavia: None declared, Gaia Montanelli: None declared, Adriana Severino: None declared, Monica Caronni: None declared, Corrado Campochiaro Speakers bureau: Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, GSK, SOBI, Enrico De Lorenzis: None declared, Gerlando Natalello: None declared, Paolo Delvino: None declared, Claudio Tirelli: None declared, Lorenzo Cavagna: None declared, Giacomo De Luca Speakers bureau: SOBI, Novartis, Celgene, Pfizer, MSD, Silvia Laura Bosello: None declared, Lorenzo Beretta Grant/research support from: Pfizer

The Italian Society of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gout

Gout is a chronic disease with an increased risk of premature death related to comorbidities. Treatment of gout has proved suboptimal and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are expected to have a key role in achieving improvement. Since new evidence has become available, the Italian Society for Rheumatology (SIR) has been prompted to update the 2013 recommendations on the diagnosis and management of gout. The framework of the Guidelines International Network Adaptation Working Group was adopted to identify, appraise (AGREE II), synthesize, and customize the existing gout CPGs to the needs of the Italian healthcare context. The task force consisting of rheumatologists from the SIR Epidemiology Unit and a committee with experience on gout identified key health questions to guide a systematic literature review. The target audience includes physicians and health professionals who manage gout in practice, and the target population includes adult patients suspected or diagnosed as having gout. These recommendations were finally rated by an external multi-disciplinary commission. From a systematic search in databases (Medline, Embase) and grey literature, 8 CPGs were selected and appraised by two independent raters. Combining evidence and statements from these CPGs and clinical expertise, 14 recommendations were developed and graded according to the level of evidence. The statements and potential impact on clinical practice were discussed and assessed. These revised recommendations are intended to provide guidance for the diagnosis and the treatment of gout and to disseminate the best evidence-based healthcare for this disease.

Nailfold videocapillaroscopy in antisynthetase syndrome

A 57-year-old woman with a diagnosis of antisynthetase syndrome (ASSD) underwent a nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) showing a scleroderma pattern. Alterations in capillary morphology have been reported in adults with inflammatory myositis (IM) but only recently have the differences in NVC findings between these two diseases been established. ASSD is currently classified as a subset of IM, for which reason only a few studies in literature evaluate its specific hallmarks, showing nonspecific features of NVC in patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis (DM) and antisynthetase antibodies. To our knowledge, this is the first description of ASSD capillaroscopy features, and the first report of NVC in ASSD with evidence of scleroderma pattern. Further studies are needed to define clearly frequency, typical features, and possible correlation with clinical and serological data of NVC changes in ASSD, differences between microangiopathy in ASSD and systemic sclerosis or DM.

Overuse of Prescription and OTC Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been demonstrated to have significant cardiovascular and gastrointestinal toxicity; high dose of intake and concomitant use of multiple compounds or corticosteroids are factors that increase the risk of NSAID toxicity. In this paper we described our experience on NSAIDs misuse (both prescribing and OTC formulations), particularly relevant in the setting of rheumatoid arthritis (39.5% of patients) and osteoarthritis (47% of patients). We also evaluated causes underlying NSAIDs misuse (e.g. not satisfactory pain control, other painful conditions, etc).

Frequency of Th1, Th2 and Th17 producing T lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage of patients with systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

The pathophysiology of the lung fibrotic process in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is not fully elucidated. Since this pattern represents the leading cause of death in SSc, the knowledge of its actual pathophysiology is basic to prevent and stage pulmonary damage. In this study, we aimed to further investigate the relationship between the functional profiles of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) T cells and the pulmonary manifestation of the disease.

METHODS

With this aim, we assessed the frequency of Th1, Th2 and Th17 producing T-lymphocytes and their effector cytokines in BAL of SSc patients without signs or symptoms of lung interstitial involvement (SScFib-) and with interstitial lung fibrosis (SScFib+). We also study as control groups: patients with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), patients with sarcoidosis and 9 healthy controls (NHCs).

RESULTS

SScFib- showed an increase in BAL Th1/Th2 balance compared to NHCs, which was even higher than that observed in sarcoidosis. SScFib+ showed a shift towards a lower Th1/Th2 ratio as compared to SScFib-. The frequency of Th17 BAL T cells did not change among study groups.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirm the Th1/Th2 imbalance hypothesis on the pathogenesis of interstitial fibrosis in SSc patients, and suggest a possible utility in the assessment of BAL Th1/Th2 ratio.

Analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid proteome from systemic sclerosis patients with or without functional, clinical and radiological signs of lung fibrosis

Lung fibrosis is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in systemic sclerosis (SSc). However, its pathogenesis still needs to be elucidated. We examined whether the alteration of certain proteins in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) might have a protective or a causative role in the lung fibrogenesis process. For this purpose we compared the BALF protein profile obtained from nine SSc patients with lung fibrosis (SSc_Fib+) with that obtained from six SSc patients without pulmonary fibrosis (SSc_Fib-) by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE). Only spots and spot-trains that were consistently expressed in a different way in the two study groups were taken into consideration. In total, 47 spots and spot-trains, corresponding to 30 previously identified proteins in human BALF, showed no significant variation between SSc_Fib+ patients and SSc_Fib- patients, whereas 24 spots showed a reproducible significant variation in the two study groups. These latter spots corresponded to 11 proteins or protein fragments, including serum albumin fragments (13 spots), 5 previously recognized proteins (7 spots), and 4 proteins (3 spots) that had not been previously described in human BALF maps, namely calumenin, cytohesin-2, cystatin SN, and mitochondrial DNA topoisomerase 1 (mtDNA TOP1). Mass analysis did not determine one protein-spot. The two study groups revealed a significant difference in BALF protein composition. Whereas levels of glutathione S-transferase P (GSTP), Cu–Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD) and cystatin SN were downregulated in SSc_Fib+ patients compared with SSc_Fib- patients, we observed a significant upregulation of α1-acid glycoprotein, haptoglobin-α chain, calgranulin (Cal) B, cytohesin-2, calumenin, and mtDNA TOP1 in SSc_Fib+ patients. Some of these proteins (GSTP, Cu–Zn SOD, and cystatin SN) seem to be involved in mechanisms that protect lungs against injury or inflammation, whereas others (Cal B, cytohesin-2, and calumenin) seem to be involved in mechanisms that drive lung fibrogenesis. Even if the 2-DE analysis of BALF did not provide an exhaustive identification of all BALF proteins, especially those of low molecular mass, it allows the identification of proteins that might have a role in lung fibrogenesis. Further longitudinal studies on larger cohorts of patients will be necessary to assess their usefulness as predictive markers of disease.

Serum cytokines and steroidal hormones in polymyalgia rheumatica and elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) may create some difficulties in the differential diagnosis of elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA) and of EORA with PMR-like onset (EORA/PMR).

AIM

To investigate possible differences between three groups of patients, with regard to serum levels of inflammatory cytokines and steroidal hormones at baseline and after 1 month of treatment with glucocorticoids (prednisone 7.5-12.5 mg/day).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

14 patients with PMR, 15 with EORA and 14 with EORA/PMR, as well as 15 healthy, matched controls were analysed. Tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), interleukin (IL)6, IL1 receptor antagonist (IL1Ra), cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS) and 17-hydroxy-progesterone (PRG) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Serum levels of both TNFalpha and IL6 were significantly higher in all three groups of patients than in controls (p<0.01). Serum IL6 levels were significantly higher in patients with both PMR and EORA/PMR than in patients with EORA (p<0.05). IL1Ra serum levels were significantly higher in patients with EORA than in controls (p<0.001) and in patients with PMR and EORA/PMR (p<0.05). DHEAS was significantly lower in patients with EORA/PMR than in those with EORA (p<0.05). PRG was significantly higher in all patient groups (p<0.05). After glucocorticoid treatment, serum TNFalpha and IL6 levels significantly decreased in all patient groups; IL1Ra significantly increased in patients with PMR and in those with EORA/PMR; cortisol, DHEAS, and PRG significantly decreased in patients with PMR and in those with EORA/PMR (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Different cytokine and steroidal hormone patterns suggest that patients with PMR and those with EORA/PMR seem to be have a more intensive inflammatory reaction and are more efficient responders to glucocorticoid treatment than patients with EORA.

Diagnostic value of procalcitonin measurement in febrile patients with systemic autoimmune diseases

OBJECTIVE

To determine the usefulness of plasma procalcitonin (PCT) measurement to suspect infectious etiology in febrile patients with systemic autoimmune disease.

METHODS

PCT, C-Reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and white blood cell count (WBC) were measured in 44 consecutive inpatients with a diagnosis of systemic autoimmune disease and fever >38 masculine C. After careful microbiologic screening no obvious infection was demonstrated in 24 patients (Group A) while an infectious bacterial complication was diagnosed in 20 cases (Group B).

RESULTS

Median PCT levels were significantly higher in the group B (1.11 vs 0.24 ng/ml; p = 0.0007), whereas the differences for CRP, WBC and ESR did not reach statistical significance. PCT also exhibited a good sensitivity and specificity (75%) in differentiating patients with infection from those with disease flare. With respect to positive and negative predictive values (71.4% and 78.2%), PCT markedly exceeded the other variables. By analyzing PCT values by disease we identified a false positive subgroup of patients suffering from adult onset Still's disease (AOSD), showing markedly elevated PCT levels in absence of infection. By excluding these patients, PCT showed a very good sensitivity and specificity (73.6% and 89.4%) and the area under receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve rose from 0.801 to 0.904.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that elevated PCT concentrations offer good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of systemic bacterial infection in febrile patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. However, in fever associated with AOSD PCT may be elevated even in the absence of infectious complication.

[Early electroretinografic changes in elderly RA patients treated with hydroxychloroquine]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of fundoscopy, electrooculography, electroretinogram and visually evoked potentials in early detection of hydroxychloroquine retinal toxicity in RA patients and to evaluate the influence of patients' age, drug dosage, concomitant therapy (prednisone and methotrexate) and serum creatinine levels in the development of this side effect.

METHODS

From september to december 1999, we have enrolled 32 RA patients (13 males, 19 females) starting hydroxychloroquine treatment. The patients underwent regular ophthalmological examination (fundoscopy, electro-oculography, electroretinogram and visually evoked potentials) every 4 months. Disease activity was evaluated every two months by clinical and routine serological examination.

RESULTS

No patients developed retinopathy during 1 year's follow-up; fundoscopy, electrooculography, and visually evoked potentials did not vary from the baseline. On the other hand, electroretinogram showed early alterations of scotopic and photopic response; moreover a significant statistical correlation between patients' age (more than 65 years) and b1 photopic wave increase (p < 0,05) was observed. No correlation was found between the development of electro-retinographic alterations and hydroxychloroquine dosage, concomitant therapy and serum creatinine levels

CONCLUSION

Our data show the inefficacy of fundoscopy, electrooculography and visually evoked potentials in early detection of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy. On the other hand electroretinogram allows early detection of retinal alterations during hydroxychloroquine treatment, in patients older than 65 years.