Implementation of influenza point-of-care testing and patient cohorting during a high-incidence season: a retrospective analysis of impact on infection prevention and control and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

During high-incidence influenza seasons, a robust infection prevention and control policy is imperative to reduce nosocomial transmission of influenza.

AIM

To assess the impact of influenza point-of-care testing (POCT) in an emergency department (ED) and patient cohorting on an influenza ward on infection prevention and control and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Influenza POCT was operational in the study ED from 21^st January 2018 and patient cohorting was operational on an influenza ward from 25^th January 2018. A retrospective 'before-after' analysis was performed with pre-intervention defined as 1^st November 2017 to 20^th January 2018 and post-intervention defined as 21^st January 2018 to 30^th April 2018. The primary outcome was the rate of hospital-acquired influenza. Secondary outcomes included antiviral prescription and length of stay. The length of time that inpatients remained influenza-positive was estimated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

FINDINGS

There were 654 inpatients with confirmed influenza during the 2017/18 influenza season: 223 pre- and 431 post-intervention. Post-intervention, there were fewer cases of hospital-acquired influenza per day (0.66 vs 0.95, P < 0.0001), median length of stay was shorter (5.5 vs 7.5 days, P = 0.005) and antiviral prescription was more frequent (80% vs 64.1%, P < 0.0001). Cohorting released 779 single rooms for use elsewhere in the trust. The fixed probability of being PCR-negative by the next day (P) was 0.14 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-0.16] for immunocompetent patients. This implies that half of immunocompetent patients are PCR-negative by five days post-diagnosis (95% CI 5-6).

CONCLUSION

Influenza POCT in an ED and patient cohorting on an influenza ward were associated with reduced nosocomial transmission of influenza and improved patient flow. A policy of retesting immunocompetent patients five days post-diagnosis could allow half of these patients to come out of respiratory isolation earlier.

The impact of the introduction of fidaxomicin on the management of Clostridium difficile infection in seven NHS secondary care hospitals in England: a series of local service evaluations

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is associated with high mortality. Reducing incidence is a priority for patients, clinicians, the National Health Service (NHS) and Public Health England alike. In June 2012, fidaxomicin (FDX) was launched for the treatment of adults with CDI. The objective of this evaluation was to collect robust real-world data to understand the effectiveness of FDX in routine practice. In seven hospitals introducing FDX between July 2012 and July 2013, data were collected retrospectively from medical records on CDI episodes occurring 12 months before/after the introduction of FDX. All hospitalised patients aged ≥18 years with primary CDI (diarrhoea with presence of toxin A/B without a previous CDI in the previous 3 months) were included. Recurrence was defined as in-patient diarrhoea re-emergence requiring treatment any time within 3 months after the first episode. Each hospital had a different protocol for the use of FDX. In hospitals A and B, where FDX was used first line for all primary and recurrent episodes, the recurrence rate reduced from 10.6 % to 3.1 % and from 16.3 % to 3.1 %, with a significant difference in 28-day mortality from 18.2 % to 3.1 % (p < 0.05) and 17.3 % to 6.3 % (p < 0.05) for hospitals A and B, respectively. In hospitals using FDX in selected patients only, the changes in recurrence rates and mortality were less marked. The pattern of adoption of FDX appears to affect its impact on CDI outcome, with maximum reduction in recurrence and all-cause mortality where it is used as first-line treatment.

Should children drink before discharge from day surgery?

The ability to drink clear liquids without vomiting after anesthesia and surgery is a commonly used criteria for discharge of pediatric day surgery patients. We hypothesized that the ability to drink as a prerequisite for discharge would not affect the frequency of vomiting, delay discharge, or increase the frequency of readmission of children for dehydration after day surgical procedures. We randomized 989 patients between the ages of 1 month and 18.0 yr to one of two groups. The 464 "mandatory drinkers" were required to demonstrate the ability to drink clear liquids without vomiting prior to discharge from the hospital, whereas 525 "elective drinkers" were allowed but not required to drink. Other than the discharge criteria, the patients were managed in an identical fashion; the minimum volume of intravenous fluids received by all patients was adequate to supply a calculated 8-h fluid deficit prior to discharge from the hospital. There were no differences between the two groups in the incidence of vomiting in the operating room, the postanesthesia care unit, or after discharge from the hospital. However, in the day surgery unit, only 14% of the elective drinkers vomited compared to 23% of the mandatory drinker group (P less than 0.001). The mandatory drinkers had a more prolonged stay in the day surgical unit, averaging 101 +/- 58 min (mean +/- SD) compared to 84 +/- 40 min for elective drinkers (P less than 0.001). No patient in either group required admission to the hospital for persistent vomiting on the day of surgery, and no patient required readmission for vomiting or dehydration after discharge from the day surgery unit.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)