GestaltMatcher Database - A global reference for the facial phenotypic variability of rare human diseases

Dysmorphologists sometimes encounter challenges in recognizing disorders due to phenotypic variability influenced by factors such as age and ethnicity. Moreover, the performance of Next Generation Phenotyping Tools such as GestaltMatcher is dependent on the diversity of the training set. Therefore, we developed GestaltMatcher Database (GMDB) - a global reference for the phenotypic variability of rare diseases that complies with the FAIR-principles. We curated dysmorphic patient images and metadata from 2,224 publications, transforming GMDB into an online dynamic case report journal. To encourage clinicians worldwide to contribute, each case can receive a Digital Object Identifier (DOI), making it a citable micro-publication. This resulted in a collection of 2,312 unpublished images, partly with longitudinal data. We have compiled a collection of 10,189 frontal images from 7,695 patients representing 683 disorders. The web interface enables gene- and phenotype-centered queries for registered users (https://db.gestaltmatcher.org/). Despite the predominant European ancestry of most patients (59%), our global collaborations have facilitated the inclusion of data from frequently underrepresented ethnicities, with 17% Asian, 4% African, and 6% with other ethnic backgrounds. The analysis has revealed a significant enhancement in GestaltMatcher performance across all ethnic groups, incorporating non-European ethnicities, showcasing a remarkable increase in Top-1-Accuracy by 31.56% and Top-5-Accuracy by 12.64%. Importantly, this improvement was achieved without altering the performance metrics for European patients. GMDB addresses dysmorphology challenges by representing phenotypic variability and including underrepresented groups, enhancing global diagnostic rates and serving as a vital clinician reference database.

Applying Machine Learning to Blood Count Data Predicts Sepsis with ICU Admission

BACKGROUND

Timely diagnosis is crucial for sepsis treatment. Current machine learning (ML) models suffer from high complexity and limited applicability. We therefore created an ML model using only complete blood count (CBC) diagnostics.

METHODS

We collected non-intensive care unit (non-ICU) data from a German tertiary care centre (January 2014 to December 2021). Using patient age, sex, and CBC parameters (haemoglobin, platelets, mean corpuscular volume, white and red blood cells), we trained a boosted random forest, which predicts sepsis with ICU admission. Two external validations were conducted using data from another German tertiary care centre and the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database (MIMIC-IV). Using the subset of laboratory orders also including procalcitonin (PCT), an analogous model was trained with PCT as an additional feature.

RESULTS

After exclusion, 1 381 358 laboratory requests (2016 from sepsis cases) were available. The CBC model shows an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.872 (95% CI, 0.857-0.887). External validations show AUROCs of 0.805 (95% CI, 0.787-0.824) for University Medicine Greifswald and 0.845 (95% CI, 0.837-0.852) for MIMIC-IV. The model including PCT revealed a significantly higher AUROC (0.857; 95% CI, 0.836-0.877) than PCT alone (0.790; 95% CI, 0.759-0.821; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that routine CBC results could significantly improve diagnosis of sepsis when combined with ML. The CBC model can facilitate early sepsis prediction in non-ICU patients with high robustness in external validations. Its implementation in clinical decision support systems has strong potential to provide an essential time advantage and increase patient safety.

Development, Design and Utilization of a CDSS for Refeeding Syndrome in Real Life Inpatient Care-A Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

The refeeding syndrome (RFS) is an oftentimes-unrecognized complication of reintroducing nutrition in malnourished patients that can lead to fatal cardiovascular failure. We hypothesized that a clinical decision support system (CDSS) can improve RFS recognition and management.

METHODS

We developed an algorithm from current diagnostic criteria for RFS detection, tested the algorithm on a retrospective dataset and combined the final algorithm with therapy and referral recommendations in a knowledge-based CDSS. The CDSS integration into clinical practice was prospectively investigated for six months.

RESULTS

The utilization of the RFS-CDSS lead to RFS diagnosis in 13 out of 21 detected cases (62%). It improved patient-related care and documentation, e.g., RFS-specific coding (E87.7), increased from once coded in 30 month in the retrospective cohort to four times in six months in the prospective cohort and doubled the rate of nutrition referrals in true positive patients (retrospective referrals in true positive patients 33% vs. prospective referrals in true positive patients 71%).

CONCLUSION

CDSS-facilitated RFS diagnosis is possible and improves RFS recognition. This effect and its impact on patient-related outcomes needs to be further investigated in a large randomized-controlled trial.

Refeeding Syndrome—Diagnostic Challenges and the Potential of Clinical Decision Support Systems

BACKGROUND

Refeeding syndrome (RFS) can occur in malnourished patients when normal, enteral, or parenteral feeding is resumed. The syndrome often goes unrecognized and may, in the most severe cases, result in death. The diagnosis of RFS can be crucially facilitated by the use of clinical decision support systems (CDSS).

METHODS

The literature in PubMed was searched for current treatment recommendations, randomized intervention studies, and publications on RFS and CDSS. We also took account of insights gained from the development and implementation of our own CDSS for the diagnosis of RFS.

RESULTS

The identification of high-risk patients and the recognition of manifest RFS is clinically challenging due to the syndrome's unspecific symptoms and physicians' lack of awareness of the risk of this condition. The literature shows that compared to patients without RFS, malnourished patients with RFS have significantly greater 6-month mortality (odds ratio 1.54, 95% confidence interval: [1.04; 2.28]) and an elevated risk of admission to intensive care (odds ratio 2.71 [1.01; 7.27]). In a prospective testing program, use of our own CDSS led to correct diagnosis in two thirds of cases.

CONCLUSION

RFS is difficult to detect and represents a high risk to the patients affected. Appropriate CDSS can identify such patients and ensure proper professional care.