A Phase Ib/II study of IGF-neutralising antibody xentuzumab with enzalutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

This multicentre, open-label, Phase Ib/II trial evaluated the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) 1/2 neutralising antibody xentuzumab plus enzalutamide in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

METHODS

The trial included Phase Ib escalation and expansion parts and a randomised Phase II part versus enzalutamide alone. Primary endpoints in the Phase Ib escalation, Phase Ib expansion and Phase II parts were maximum tolerated dose (MTD), prostate-specific antigen response and investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), respectively. Patients in the Phase Ib escalation and Phase II parts had progressed on/after docetaxel/abiraterone.

RESULTS

In the Phase Ib escalation (n = 10), no dose-limiting toxicities were reported, and xentuzumab 1000 mg weekly plus enzalutamide 160 mg daily (Xe1000 + En160) was defined as the MTD and recommended Phase 2 dose. In the Phase Ib expansion (n = 24), median PFS was 8.2 months, and one patient had a confirmed, long-term response. In Phase II (n = 86), median PFS for the Xe1000 + En160 and En160 arms was 7.4 and 6.2 months, respectively. Subgroup analysis suggested trends towards benefit with Xe1000 + En160 in patients whose tumours had high levels of IGF1 mRNA or PTEN protein. Overall, the combination was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Xentuzumab plus enzalutamide was tolerable but lacked antitumour activity in unselected patients with mCRPC.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT number 2013-004011-41.

Mutational profiles of metastatic colorectal cancer treated with FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab before and after secondary resection (AIO KRK 0306; FIRE-3)

Secondary resection of metastases is recommended in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Data describing changes in mutational profiles of corresponding primary tumor and metastatic tissue after conversion treatment are limited. Next generation sequencing was performed in formalin-fixed mCRC samples from patients of the FIRE-3 trial (FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab) before treatment start (baseline) and after secondary resection of metastases (post baseline). Changes of mutational profiles and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were assessed within a post-hoc analysis. Median overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) were compared between treatment arms. Paired tumor samples were obtained from 25 patients (19 RAS wild-type, 6 RAS mutant by pyrosequencing). ORR (92.0% vs 58.0%) and OS (60.8 vs 35.4 months, hazard ratio = 0.39 [95% CI 0.14-1.12], P = .08) were higher for patients receiving cetuximab. After conversion therapy, 56 alterations (42 in the cetuximab and 14 in the bevacizumab arm) were newly observed in 18 patients (9 each treated with cetuximab or bevacizumab). Gains (n = 21) and losses (n = 21) of alterations occurred during cetuximab-based treatment, while mainly gains of alterations occurred during bevacizumab (n = 10). Three of nine patients treated with cetuximab that presented a change of mutational profiles, developed resistance to cetuximab. Mutational profiles were largely comparable before and after treatment with anti-VEGF or anti-EGFR directed monoclonal antibodies after secondary resection. Mutations associated with resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies were observed in only one-third of patients.

A phase Ib/II study of xentuzumab, an IGF-neutralising antibody, combined with exemestane and everolimus in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer

Background

Xentuzumab—a humanised IgG1 monoclonal antibody—binds IGF-1 and IGF-2, inhibiting their growth-promoting signalling and suppressing AKT activation by everolimus. This phase Ib/II exploratory trial evaluated xentuzumab plus everolimus and exemestane in hormone receptor-positive, locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer (LA/MBC).

Methods

Patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative LA/MBC resistant to non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors were enrolled. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of xentuzumab/everolimus/exemestane were determined in phase I (single-arm, dose-escalation). In phase II (open-label), patients were randomised 1:1 to the RP2D of xentuzumab/everolimus/exemestane or everolimus/exemestane alone. Randomisation was stratified by the presence of visceral metastases. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

MTD was determined as xentuzumab 1000 mg weekly plus everolimus 10 mg/day and exemestane 25 mg/day. A total of 140 patients were enrolled in phase II (70 to each arm). Further recruitment was stopped following an unfavourable benefit-risk assessment by the internal Data Monitoring Committee appointed by the sponsor. Xentuzumab was discontinued; patients could receive everolimus/exemestane if clinically indicated. Median PFS was 7.3 months (95% CI 3.3–not calculable) in the xentuzumab/everolimus/exemestane group and 5.6 months (3.7–9.1) in the everolimus/exemestane group (hazard ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.57–1.65; P = 0.9057). In a pre-specified subgroup of patients without visceral metastases at screening, xentuzumab/everolimus/exemestane showed evidence of PFS benefit versus everolimus/exemestane (hazard ratio 0.21 [0.05–0.98]; P = 0.0293). Most common any-cause adverse events in phase II were diarrhoea (29 [41.4%] in the xentuzumab/everolimus/exemestane group versus 20 [29.0%] in the everolimus/exemestane group), mucosal inflammation (27 [38.6%] versus 21 [30.4%]), stomatitis (24 [34.3%] versus 24 [34.8%]), and asthenia (21 [30.0%] versus 24 [34.8%]).

Conclusions

Addition of xentuzumab to everolimus/exemestane did not improve PFS in the overall population, leading to early discontinuation of the trial. Evidence of PFS benefit was observed in patients without visceral metastases when treated with xentuzumab/everolimus/exemestane, leading to initiation of the phase II XENERA™-1 trial (NCT03659136).

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02123823. Prospectively registered, 8 March 2013.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13058-020-01382-8.

Midazolam microdosing applied in early clinical development for drug-drug interaction assessment

AIMS

We aimed to incorporate a pharmacologically inactive midazolam microdose into early clinical studies for the assessment of CYP3A drug-drug interaction liability.

METHODS

Three early clinical studies were conducted with substances (Compounds A, B and C) which gave positive CYP3A perpetrator signals in vitro. A 75 μg dose of midazolam was administered alone (baseline CYP3A activity) followed by administration with the highest dose groups tested for each compound on Day 1/3 and Day 14 or Day 17. Midazolam exposure (AUC_0-∞ , C_max ) during administration with the test substances was compared to baseline data via an analysis of variance on log-transformed data. Partial AUC_2-4 ratios were also compared to AUC_0-∞ ratios using linear regression on log-transformed data.

RESULTS

Test compound C_max values exceeded relevant thresholds for drug-drug interaction liability. Midazolam concentrations were quantifiable over the full profiles for all subjects in all studies. Point estimates of the midazolam AUC_0-∞ gMean ratios ranged from 108.3 to 127.1% for Compound A, from 93.3 to 114.5% for Compound B, and from 92.0 to 96.7% for the two highest dose groups of Compound C. C_max gMean ratios were in the same range. Thus, no relevant drug-drug interactions were evident, based on the results of midazolam microdosing. AUC_2-4 ratios from these studies were comparable to the AUC_0-∞ ratios.

CONCLUSION

Midazolam microdosing incorporated into early clinical studies is a feasible tool for reducing dedicated drug-drug interaction studies, meaning reduced subject burden. Limited sampling could further reduce subject burden, costs and needed resources.

Targeting IGF-1/2 with xentuzumab (Xe) plus enzalutamide (En) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after progression on docetaxel chemotherapy (DCt) and abiraterone (Abi): Randomized phase II trial results

5030

Background: Insulin-like growth factor receptor-1 (IGF-1R) signaling activates the PI3K/AKT pathway and may lead to androgen receptor (AR) transactivation and progression to endocrine treatment resistance. Xe, an IGF-ligand-neutralizing antibody, binds to IGF-1 and IGF-2 and inhibits IGF-1R signaling. This multi-center randomized phase II trial (NCT02204072) evaluated anti-tumor activity of Xe plus En in mCRPC. Methods: Men with histologically/cytologically confirmed mCRPC and progression after DCt+Abi were randomized to receive Xe 1000mg IV QW + En 160mg/day oral, or En alone (28-day cycles until progression or intolerable adverse events [AEs]). Primary endpoint: progression-free survival by investigator assessment (PFS-IA); secondary: PFS by central review (PFS-CR), overall survival (OS), AEs. Results: Overall, 43 patients were randomized per arm; 70% Caucasian and 29% Asian (median age 70 y; range 46–88). At baseline (BL) the two arms were generally well balanced, although 33% v 47% were ECOG PS O, and 72% v 56% had a Gleason total score ≥8. By data cut-off (23 October 2017), 39/43 (Xe+En) and 38/43 patients (En) had discontinued, most due to disease progression. The median PFS-IA was 7.4 m for Xe+En (95% CI: 3.5–8.7) and 6.2 m for En (3.5–11.1) [HR = 0.99 (0.56–1.73); p = 0.96]. The results were similar after adjusting for BL ECOG PS and Gleason score. The median PFS-CR was 3.6 m for Xe+En (3.5–8.1) and 6.2 m for En (3.6–8.3) (HR = 1.22 [0.70–2.13]; p = 0.48). OS data are immature. For the two arms, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rates were 21% and 19%; maximum decline in PSA: -20 v -9 μg/L; PSA change at week 12: 19% v 18%; maximum decline in circulating tumor cells (CTC): -52% v -35%; and CTC response: 16% v 11%. The most frequently reported AEs were: fatigue 67% v 49%; decreased appetite 56% v 54%; weight reduction 37% v 12%; anemia 33% v 44%; back pain 30% v 37%. Nine patients discontinued Xe due to AEs. Conclusions: Addition of Xe to En did not prolong PFS in mCRPC compared with En alone. There were no notable differences in PSA-related endpoints and CTC between arms. Clinical trial information: NCT02204072.

Abstract P6-21-01: Xentuzumab (BI 836845), an insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-neutralizing antibody (Ab), combined with exemestane and everolimus in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (LA/mBC): Randomized phase 2 results

Background:

Xentuzumab (Xen), an IGF-1/-2-neutralizing Ab, binds IGF-1 and IGF-2, inhibits their growth-promoting signaling, and suppresses AKT activation by everolimus (Ev). This Phase 1b/2 trial evaluates Xen in combination with Ev and exemestane (Ex) in HR+/HER2− LA/mBC.

Methods:

The two-arm, open-label, randomized Phase 2 part enrolled female patients (pts) with HR+/HER2− LA/mBC not amenable to curative therapy and refractory to nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. Pts were randomized (1:1) to: oral Ev (10 mg/d) + Ex (25 mg/d); or Xen (1000 mg/wk iv) + Ev (10 mg/d) + Ex (25 mg/d). Randomization was stratified by visceral metastases (VM; Y vs N). Treatment continued in 28-day cycles until progression, intolerable adverse events (AEs) or other reasons for discontinuation. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with an interim futility analysis incorporated in the study design.

Results:

Following the results of the interim analysis, the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) advised early termination of the trial and discontinuation of Xen treatment. Thus, Xen treatment exposure time and time-to-event data for the Xen+Ev+Ex arm are limited. Of the 139 women treated (Xen+Ev+Ex 70; Ev+Ex 69), 77% had VM. Median PFS was not significantly different between arms (Xen+Ev+Ex vs Ev+Ex, 7.3 vs 5.6 months; HR [95% CI] 0.97 [0.57–1.65]; p=0.91). In a pre-specified subgroup of pts without VM, Xen+Ev+Ex showed favorable PFS vs Ev+Ex (HR 0.21 [0.05–0.98]; Pint=0.0141). Pint values <0.05 were also observed for ad hoc subgroups: measurable disease at baseline; bone-only metastases. Rates of total AEs/grade ≥3 AEs/drug-related AEs were similar between arms (Xen+Ev+Ex, 100/60/96%; Ev+Ex, 99/58/96%). The most common AEs overall were diarrhea (44 vs 33%), mucosal inflammation (39 vs 32%), rash (34 vs 33%) and stomatitis (34 vs 38%); most were grade 1/2. 6% of pts in the Xen+Ev+Ex arm discontinued Xen due to AEs. Ev/Ex discontinuations (Xen+Ev+Ex vs Ev+Ex) occurred in 13/6% vs 23/6%; 1 pt each in the Xen+Ev+Ex arm died from pneumonitis and liver injury and 1 pt each in the Ev+Ex arm died from Burkitt's lymphoma, acute kidney injury and metastases to the peritoneum.

Conclusion:

In the overall population, PFS did not improve with the addition of Xen to Ev+Ex and the trial was therefore discontinued early. Nevertheless, a favorable signal was observed in the pre-specified subgroup of pts without VM when treated with Xen+Ev+Ex, which warrants additional investigation. The safety profile was comparable between arms.

Citation Format: Crown J, Sablin M-P, Cortés J, Bergh J, Im S-A, Lu Y-S, Martínez N, Neven P, Lee KS, Morales S, Pérez-Fidalgo JA, Adamson D, Goncalves A, Prat A, Jerusalem G, Schlieker L, Espadero R-M, Bogenrieder T, Chin-Lun Huang D, Schmid P. Xentuzumab (BI 836845), an insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-neutralizing antibody (Ab), combined with exemestane and everolimus in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (LA/mBC): Randomized phase 2 results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-21-01.

Multivariate binary classification of imbalanced datasets-A case study based on high-dimensional multiplex autoimmune assay data

The classification of a population by a specific trait is a major task in medicine, for example when in a diagnostic setting groups of patients with specific diseases are identified, but also when in predictive medicine a group of patients is classified into specific disease severity classes that might profit from different treatments. When the sizes of those subgroups become small, for example in rare diseases, imbalances between the classes are more the rule than the exception and make statistical classification problematic when the error rate of the minority class is high. Many observations are classified as belonging to the majority class, while the error rate of the majority class is low. This case study aims to investigate class imbalance for Random Forests and Powered Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PPLS-DA) and to evaluate the performance of these classifiers when they are combined with methods to compensate imbalance (sampling methods, cost-sensitive learning approaches). We evaluate all approaches with a scoring system taking the classification results into consideration. This case study is based on one high-dimensional multiplex autoimmune assay dataset describing immune response to antigens and consisting of two classes of patients: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Systemic Lupus Erythemathodes (SLE). Datasets with varying degrees of imbalance are created by successively reducing the class of RA patients. Our results indicate possible benefit of cost-sensitive learning approaches for Random Forests. Although further research is needed to verify our findings by investigating other datasets or large-scale simulation studies, we claim that this work has the potential to increase awareness of practitioners to this problem of class imbalance and stresses the importance of considering methods to compensate class imbalance.