1
|
Richards T, Miles LF, Clevenger B, Keegan A, Abeysiri S, Rao Baikady R, Besser MW, Browne JP, Klein AA, Macdougall IC, Murphy GJ, Anker SD, Dahly D, Besser M, Browne J, Clevenger B, Kegan A, Klein A, Miles L, MacDougall I, Baikady RR, Dahly D, Bradbury A, Richards T, Burley T, Van Loen S, Anker S, Klein A, MacDougall I, Murphy G, Besser M, Unsworth I, Clayton T, Collier T, Potter K, Abeysiri S, Evans R, Knight R, Swinson R, Van Dyck L, Keidan J, Williamson L, Crook A, Pepper J, Dobson J, Newsome S, Godec T, Dodd M, Richards T, Van Dyck L, Evans R, Abeysiri S, Clevenger B, Butcher A, Swinson R, Collier T, Potter K, Anker S, Kelly J, Morris S, Browne J, Keidan J, Grocott M, Chau M, Knight R, Collier T, Baikady RR, Black E, Lawrence H, Kouthra M, Horner K, Jhanji S, Todman E, Keon‐Cohen Z, Rooms M, Tomlinson J, Bailes I, Walker S, Pirie K, Gerstman M, Kasivisvanathan R, Uren S, Magee D, Eeles A, Anker R, McCanny J, O'Mahony M, Reynolds T, Batley S, Hegarty A, Trundle S, Mazzola F, Tatham K, Balint A, Morrison B, Evans M, Pang CL, Smith L, Wilson C, Sjorin V, Khatri P, Wilson M, Parkinson D, Crosbie J, Dawas K, Smyth D, Bercades G, Ryu J, Reyes A, Martir G, Gallego L, Macklin A, Rocha M, Tam DK, Brealey DD, Dhesi J, Morrison C, Hardwick J, Partridge J, Braude P, Rogerson A, Jahangir N, Thomson C, Biswell L, Cross J, Pritchard F, Mohammed A, Wallace D, Galat MG, Okello J, Symes R, Leon J, Gibbs C, Sanghera S, Dennis A, Kibutu F, Fofie J, Bird S, Alli A, Jackson Y, Albuheissi S, Brain C, Shiridzinomwa C, Ralph C, Wroath B, Hammonds F, Adams B, Faulds J, Staddon S, Hughes T, Saha S, Finney C, Harris C, Mellis C, Johnson L, Riozzi P, Yarnold A, Buchanan F, Hopkins P, Greig L, Noble H, Edwards M, Grocott M, Plumb J, Harvie D, Dushianthan A, Wakatsuki M, Leggett S, Salmon K, Bolger C, Burnish R, Otto J, Rayat G, Golder K, Bartlett P, Bali S, Seaward L, Wadams B, Tyrell B, Collins H, Tantony N, Geale R, Wilson A, Ball D, Lindsey I, Barker D, Thyseen M, Chiam P, Hannaway C, Colling K, Messer C, Verma N, Nasseri M, Poonawala G, Sellars A, Mainali P, Hammond T, Hughes A, O'Hara D, McNeela F, Shillito L, Kotze A, Moriarty C, Wilson J, Davies S, Yates D, Carter J, Redman J, Ma S, Howard K, Redfearn H, Wilcock D, Lowe J, Alexander T, Jose J, Hornzee G, Akbar F, Rey S, Patel A, Coulson S, Saini R, Santipillai J, McCretton T, McCanny J, Chima K, Collins K, Pathmanathan B, Chattersingh A, McLeavy L, Al‐Saadi Z, Patel M, Skampardoni S, Chinnadurai R, Thomas V, Keen A, Pagett K, Keatley C, Howard J, Greenhalgh M, Jenkins S, Gidda R, Watts A, Breaton C, Parker J, Mallett S, James S, Penny L, Chan K, Reeves T, Catterall M, Williams S, Birch J, Hammerton K, Williamson N, Thomas A, Evans M, Mercer L, Horsfield G, Hughes C, Cupitt J, Stoddard E, McNamara H, Birt C, Hardy A, Dennis R, Butcher D, O'Sullivan S, Pope A, Elhanash S, Preston S, Officer H, Stoker A, Moss S, Walker A, Gipson A, Melville J, Bradley‐Potts J, McCormac R, Benson V, Melia K, Fielding J, Guest W, Ford S, Murdoch H, Beames S, Townshend P, Collins K, Glass J, Cartwright B, Altemimi B, Berresford L, Jones C, Kelliher L, de Silva S, Blightman K, Pendry K, Pinto L, Allard S, Taylor L, Chishti A, Scott J, O'Hare D, Lewis M, Hussain Z, Hallett K, Dermody S, Corbett C, Morby L, Hough M, Williams S, Williams P, Horton S, Ashcroft P, Homer A, Lang A, Dawson H, Harrison E, Thompson J, Hariharan V, Goss V, Ravi R, Butt G, Vertue M, Acheson A, Ng O, Bush D, Dickson E, Ward A, Morris S, Taylor A, Casey R, Wilson L, Vimalachandran D, Faulkner M, Jeffrey H, Gabrielle C, Martin S, Bracewell A, Ritzema J, Sproates D, Alexander‐Sefre F, Kubitzek C, Humphreys S, Curtis J, Oats P, Swann S, Holden A, Adam C, Flintoff L, Paoloni C, Bobruk K. The association between iron deficiency and outcomes: a secondary analysis of the intravenous iron therapy to treat iron deficiency anaemia in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (PREVENTT) trial. Anaesthesia 2023; 78:320-329. [PMID: 36477695 PMCID: PMC10107684 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
In the intravenous iron therapy to treat iron deficiency anaemia in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (PREVENTT) trial, the use of intravenous iron did not reduce the need for blood transfusion or reduce patient complications or length of hospital stay. As part of the trial protocol, serum was collected at randomisation and on the day of surgery. These samples were analysed in a central laboratory for markers of iron deficiency. We performed a secondary analysis to explore the potential interactions between pre-operative markers of iron deficiency and intervention status on the trial outcome measures. Absolute iron deficiency was defined as ferritin <30 μg.l-1 ; functional iron deficiency as ferritin 30-100 μg.l-1 or transferrin saturation < 20%; and the remainder as non-iron deficient. Interactions were estimated using generalised linear models that included different subgroup indicators of baseline iron status. Co-primary endpoints were blood transfusion or death and number of blood transfusions, from randomisation to 30 days postoperatively. Secondary endpoints included peri-operative change in haemoglobin, postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. Most patients had iron deficiency (369/452 [82%]) at randomisation; one-third had absolute iron deficiency (144/452 [32%]) and half had functional iron deficiency (225/452 [50%]). The change in pre-operative haemoglobin with intravenous iron compared with placebo was greatest in patients with absolute iron deficiency, mean difference 8.9 g.l-1 , 95%CI 5.3-12.5; moderate in functional iron deficiency, mean difference 2.8 g.l-1 , 95%CI -0.1 to 5.7; and with little change seen in those patients who were non-iron deficient. Subgroup analyses did not suggest that intravenous iron compared with placebo reduced the likelihood of death or blood transfusion at 30 days differentially across subgroups according to baseline ferritin (p = 0.33 for interaction), transferrin saturation (p = 0.13) or in combination (p = 0.45), or for the number of blood transfusions (p = 0.06, 0.29, and 0.39, respectively). There was no beneficial effect of the use of intravenous iron compared with placebo, regardless of the metrics to diagnose iron deficiency, on postoperative complications or length of hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Richards
- Division of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Perkins South Building, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Perth, WA, Australia.,Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology and Division of Surgery, University College London, UK
| | - L F Miles
- Department of Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - B Clevenger
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK
| | - A Keegan
- Department of Haematology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia
| | - S Abeysiri
- Division of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Perkins South Building, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - R Rao Baikady
- Department of Anaesthesia, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M W Besser
- Department of Haematology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - J P Browne
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Ireland
| | - A A Klein
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - I C Macdougall
- Department of Renal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - G J Murphy
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, UK
| | - S D Anker
- Department of Cardiology, Berlin Institute of Health Centre for Regenerative Therapies; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research partner site Berlin; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - D Dahly
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Ireland.,Health Research Board Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Ireland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Richards T, Baikady RR, Clevenger B, Butcher A, Abeysiri S, Chau M, Swinson R, Collier T, Dodd M, Dyck LV, Macdougall I, Murphy G, Browne J, Bradbury A, Klein A. Preoperative intravenous iron for anaemia in elective major open abdominal surgery: the PREVENTT RCT. Health Technol Assess 2021; 25:1-58. [PMID: 33632377 DOI: 10.3310/hta25110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anaemia affects 30-50% of patients before they undergo major surgery. Preoperative anaemia is associated with increased need for blood transfusion, postoperative complications and worse patient outcomes after surgery. International guidelines support the use of intravenous iron to correct anaemia in patients before surgery. However, the use of preoperative intravenous iron for patient benefit has not been assessed in the setting of a formal clinical trial. OBJECTIVES To assess if intravenous iron given to patients with anaemia before major abdominal surgery is beneficial by reducing transfusion rates, postoperative complications, hospital stay and re-admission to hospital, and improving quality of life outcomes. DESIGN A multicentre, double-blinded, randomised, controlled, Phase III clinical trial, with 1 : 1 randomisation comparing placebo (normal saline) with intravenous iron (intravenous ferric carboxymaltose 1000 mg). Randomisation and treatment allocation were by a secure web-based service. SETTING The study was conducted across 46 hospitals in England, Scotland and Wales between September 2013 and September 2018. PARTICIPANTS Patients aged > 18 years, undergoing elective major open abdominal surgery, with anaemia [Hb level of > 90 g/l and < 120 g/l (female patients) and < 130 g/l (male patients)] who could undergo randomisation and treatment 10-42 days before their operation. INTERVENTION Double-blinded study comparing placebo of normal saline with 1000 mg of ferric carboxymaltose administered 10-42 days prior to surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Co-primary end points were risk of blood transfusion or death at 30 days postoperatively, and rate of blood transfusions at 30 days post operation. RESULTS A total of 487 patients were randomised (243 given placebo and 244 given intravenous iron), of whom 474 completed the trial and provided data for the analysis of the co-primary end points. The use of intravenous iron increased preoperative Hb levels (mean difference 4.7 g/l, 95% confidence interval 2.7 to 6.8 g/l; p < 0.0001), but had no effect compared with placebo on risk of blood transfusion or death (risk ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.37; p = 0.84; absolute risk difference +0.8%, 95% confidence interval -7.3% to 9.0%), or rates of blood transfusion (rate ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.43; p = 0.93; absolute rate difference 0.00, 95% confidence interval -0.14 to 0.15). There was no difference in postoperative complications or hospital stay. The intravenous iron group had higher Hb levels at the 8-week follow-up (difference in mean 10.7 g/l, 95% confidence interval 7.8 to 13.7 g/l; p < 0.0001). There were a total of 71 re-admissions to hospital for postoperative complications in the placebo group, compared with 38 re-admissions in the intravenous iron group (rate ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 0.85; p = 0.009). There were no differences between the groups in terms of mortality (two per group at 30 days post operation) or in any of the prespecified safety end points or serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS In patients with anaemia prior to elective major abdominal surgery, there was no benefit from giving intravenous iron before the operation. FUTURE WORK The impact of iron repletion on recovery from postoperative anaemia, and the association with reduced re-admission to hospital for complications, should be investigated. LIMITATIONS In the preoperative intravenous iron to treat anaemia in major surgery (PREVENTT) trial, all patients included had anaemia and only 20% had their anaemia corrected before surgery. The definition and causality of iron deficiency in this setting is not clear. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN67322816 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01692418. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25 No. 11. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toby Richards
- Division of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.,Institute of Clinical Trial and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.,Division of Surgery, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Ben Clevenger
- Division of Surgery, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Anaesthesia, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK
| | - Anna Butcher
- Division of Surgery, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sandy Abeysiri
- Institute of Clinical Trial and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.,Division of Surgery, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marisa Chau
- Institute of Clinical Trial and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.,Division of Surgery, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Swinson
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Tim Collier
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Matthew Dodd
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Laura Van Dyck
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Iain Macdougall
- Department of Renal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Gavin Murphy
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - John Browne
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Andrew Bradbury
- University Department of Vascular Surgery (University of Birmingham), Solihull Hospital, Solihull, UK
| | - Andrew Klein
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ponsford R, Bragg S, Allen E, Tilouche N, Meiksin R, Emmerson L, Van Dyck L, Opondo C, Morris S, Sturgess J, Brocklehurst E, Hadley A, Melendez-Torres GJ, Elbourne D, Young H, Lohan M, Mercer C, Campbell R, Bonell C. A school-based social-marketing intervention to promote sexual health in English secondary schools: the Positive Choices pilot cluster RCT. Public Health Res 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/phr09010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
The UK still has the highest rate of teenage births in western Europe. Teenagers are also the age group most likely to experience unplanned pregnancy, with around half of conceptions in those aged < 18 years ending in abortion. After controlling for prior disadvantage, teenage parenthood is associated with adverse medical and social outcomes for mothers and children, and increases health inequalities. This study evaluates Positive Choices (a new intervention for secondary schools in England) and study methods to assess the value of a Phase III trial.
Objectives
To optimise and feasibility-test Positive Choices and then conduct a pilot trial in the south of England assessing whether or not progression to Phase III would be justified in terms of prespecified criteria.
Design
Intervention optimisation and feasibility testing; pilot randomised controlled trial.
Setting
The south of England: optimisation and feasibility-testing in one secondary school; pilot cluster trial in six other secondary schools (four intervention, two control) varying by local deprivation and educational attainment.
Participants
School students in year 8 at baseline, and school staff.
Interventions
Schools were randomised (1 : 2) to control or intervention. The intervention comprised staff training, needs survey, school health promotion council, year 9 curriculum, student-led social marketing, parent information and review of school/local sexual health services.
Main outcome measures
The prespecified criteria for progression to Phase III concerned intervention fidelity of delivery and acceptability; successful randomisation and school retention; survey response rates; and feasible linkage to routine administrative data on pregnancies. The primary health outcome of births was assessed using routine data on births and abortions, and various self-reported secondary sexual health outcomes.
Data sources
The data sources were routine data on births and abortions, baseline and follow-up student surveys, interviews, audio-recordings, observations and logbooks.
Results
The intervention was optimised and feasible in the first secondary school, meeting the fidelity targets other than those for curriculum delivery and criteria for progress to the pilot trial. In the pilot trial, randomisation and school retention were successful. Student response rates in the intervention group and control group were 868 (89.4%) and 298 (84.2%), respectively, at baseline, and 863 (89.0%) and 296 (82.0%), respectively, at follow-up. The target of achieving ≥ 70% fidelity of implementation of essential elements in three schools was achieved. Coverage of relationships and sex education topics was much higher in intervention schools than in control schools. The intervention was acceptable to 80% of students. Interviews with staff indicated strong acceptability. Data linkage was feasible, but there were no exact matches for births or abortions in our cohort. Measures performed well. Poor test–retest reliability on some sexual behaviour measures reflected that this was a cohort of developing adolescents. Qualitative research confirmed the appropriateness of the intervention and theory of change, but suggested some refinements.
Limitations
The optimisation school underwent repeated changes in leadership, which undermined its participation. Moderator analyses were not conducted as these would be very underpowered.
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that this intervention has met prespecified criteria for progression to a Phase III trial.
Future work
Declining prevalence of teenage pregnancy suggests that the primary outcome in a full trial could be replaced by a more comprehensive measure of sexual health. Any future Phase III trial should have a longer lead-in from randomisation to intervention commencement.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12524938.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 9, No. 1. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Ponsford
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Sara Bragg
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Lucy Emmerson
- National Children’s Bureau Sex Education Forum (NCB SEF), London, UK
| | - Laura Van Dyck
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Charles Opondo
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Diana Elbourne
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Chris Bonell
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Richards T, Baikady RR, Clevenger B, Butcher A, Abeysiri S, Chau M, Macdougall IC, Murphy G, Swinson R, Collier T, Van Dyck L, Browne J, Bradbury A, Dodd M, Evans R, Brealey D, Anker SD, Klein A. Preoperative intravenous iron to treat anaemia before major abdominal surgery (PREVENTT): a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet 2020; 396:1353-1361. [PMID: 32896294 PMCID: PMC7581899 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31539-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 170] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative anaemia affects a high proportion of patients undergoing major elective surgery and is associated with poor outcomes. We aimed to test the hypothesis that intravenous iron given to anaemic patients before major open elective abdominal surgery would correct anaemia, reduce the need for blood transfusions, and improve patient outcomes. METHODS In a double-blind, parallel-group randomised trial, we recruited adult participants identified with anaemia at preoperative hospital visits before elective major open abdominal surgery at 46 UK tertiary care centres. Anaemia was defined as haemoglobin less than 130 g/L for men and 120 g/L for women. We randomly allocated participants (1:1) via a secure web-based service to receive intravenous iron or placebo 10-42 days before surgery. Intravenous iron was administered as a single 1000 mg dose of ferric carboxymaltose in 100 mL normal saline, and placebo was 100 mL normal saline, both given as an infusion over 15 min. Unblinded study personnel prepared and administered the study drug; participants and other clinical and research staff were blinded to treatment allocation. Coprimary endpoints were risk of the composite outcome of blood transfusion or death, and number of blood transfusions from randomisation to 30 days postoperatively. The primary analysis included all randomly assigned patients with data available for the primary endpoints; safety analysis included all randomly assigned patients according to the treatment received. This study is registered, ISRCTN67322816, and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS Of 487 participants randomly assigned to placebo (n=243) or intravenous iron (n=244) between Jan 6, 2014, and Sept 28, 2018, complete data for the primary endpoints were available for 474 (97%) individuals. Death or blood transfusion occurred in 67 (28%) of the 237 patients in the placebo group and 69 (29%) of the 237 patients in the intravenous iron group (risk ratio 1·03, 95% CI 0·78-1·37; p=0·84). There were 111 blood transfusions in the placebo group and 105 in the intravenous iron group (rate ratio 0·98, 95% CI 0·68-1·43; p=0·93). There were no significant differences between the two groups for any of the prespecified safety endpoints. INTERPRETATION Preoperative intravenous iron was not superior to placebo to reduce need for blood transfusion when administered to patients with anaemia 10-42 days before elective major abdominal surgery. FUNDING UK National Institute of Health Research Health Technology Assessment Program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toby Richards
- Division of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia; Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK; Division of Surgery, University College London, London, UK.
| | | | - Ben Clevenger
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, UK
| | - Anna Butcher
- Division of Surgery, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sandy Abeysiri
- Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK; Division of Surgery, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marisa Chau
- Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK; Division of Surgery, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Gavin Murphy
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Rebecca Swinson
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Tim Collier
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Laura Van Dyck
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - John Browne
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Andrew Bradbury
- University Department of Vascular Surgery, Birmingham University, Solihull Hospital, Solihull, UK
| | - Matthew Dodd
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Richard Evans
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - David Brealey
- Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK; Division of Surgery, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stefan D Anker
- Department of Cardiology (CVK), Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, and German Centre for Cardiovascular Research partner site Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrew Klein
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mullen M, Jin XY, Child A, Stuart AG, Dodd M, Aragon-Martin JA, Gaze D, Kiotsekoglou A, Yuan L, Hu J, Foley C, Van Dyck L, Knight R, Clayton T, Swan L, Thomson JDR, Erdem G, Crossman D, Flather M. Irbesartan in Marfan syndrome (AIMS): a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. Lancet 2019; 394:2263-2270. [PMID: 31836196 PMCID: PMC6934233 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32518-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Revised: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Irbesartan, a long acting selective angiotensin-1 receptor inhibitor, in Marfan syndrome might reduce aortic dilatation, which is associated with dissection and rupture. We aimed to determine the effects of irbesartan on the rate of aortic dilatation in children and adults with Marfan syndrome. METHODS We did a placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised trial at 22 centres in the UK. Individuals aged 6-40 years with clinically confirmed Marfan syndrome were eligible for inclusion. Study participants were all given 75 mg open label irbesartan once daily, then randomly assigned to 150 mg of irbesartan (increased to 300 mg as tolerated) or matching placebo. Aortic diameter was measured by echocardiography at baseline and then annually. All images were analysed by a core laboratory blinded to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the rate of aortic root dilatation. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN90011794. FINDINGS Between March 14, 2012, and May 1, 2015, 192 participants were recruited and randomly assigned to irbesartan (n=104) or placebo (n=88), and all were followed for up to 5 years. Median age at recruitment was 18 years (IQR 12-28), 99 (52%) were female, mean blood pressure was 110/65 mm Hg (SDs 16 and 12), and 108 (56%) were taking β blockers. Mean baseline aortic root diameter was 34·4 mm in the irbesartan group (SD 5·8) and placebo group (5·5). The mean rate of aortic root dilatation was 0·53 mm per year (95% CI 0·39 to 0·67) in the irbesartan group compared with 0·74 mm per year (0·60 to 0·89) in the placebo group, with a difference in means of -0·22 mm per year (-0·41 to -0·02, p=0·030). The rate of change in aortic Z score was also reduced by irbesartan (difference in means -0·10 per year, 95% CI -0·19 to -0·01, p=0·035). Irbesartan was well tolerated with no observed differences in rates of serious adverse events. INTERPRETATION Irbesartan is associated with a reduction in the rate of aortic dilatation in children and young adults with Marfan syndrome and could reduce the incidence of aortic complications. FUNDING British Heart Foundation, the UK Marfan Trust, the UK Marfan Association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Mullen
- Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and Devices, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - Xu Yu Jin
- Core Echo Lab, Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Anne Child
- Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Matthew Dodd
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - David Gaze
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, London UK
| | - Anatoli Kiotsekoglou
- Core Echo Lab, Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Li Yuan
- Core Echo Lab, Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; Ultrasound Department, Wuhan Children's Hospital, Tongji Medical School, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei, China
| | - Jiangting Hu
- Core Echo Lab, Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Laura Van Dyck
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Rosemary Knight
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Tim Clayton
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Lorna Swan
- Department of Adult Congenital Heart Disease, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Toronto Congenital Cardiac Centre for Adults, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Guliz Erdem
- Department of Cardiology, Acibadem International Hospital Istanbul, Turkey; School of Medicine, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - David Crossman
- School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | - Marcus Flather
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, Norwich, UK; Cardiology Department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Patterson T, Perkins GD, Joseph J, Wilson K, Van Dyck L, Robertson S, Nguyen H, McConkey H, Whitbread M, Fothergill R, Nevett J, Dalby M, Rakhit R, MacCarthy P, Perera D, Nolan JP, Redwood SR. A Randomised tRial of Expedited transfer to a cardiac arrest centre for non-ST elevation ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: The ARREST pilot randomised trial. Resuscitation 2017; 115:185-191. [DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2016] [Revised: 01/13/2017] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
7
|
Macrae D, Grieve R, Allen E, Sadique Z, Betts H, Morris K, Pappachan VJ, Parslow R, Tasker RC, Baines P, Broadhead M, Duthie ML, Fortune PM, Inwald D, McMaster P, Peters MJ, Schindler M, Guerriero C, Piercy D, Slavik Z, Snowdon C, Van Dyck L, Elbourne D. A clinical and economic evaluation of Control of Hyperglycaemia in Paediatric intensive care (CHiP): a randomised controlled trial. Health Technol Assess 2014; 18:1-210. [PMID: 24780450 DOI: 10.3310/hta18260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early research in adults admitted to intensive care suggested that tight control of blood glucose during acute illness can be associated with reductions in mortality, length of hospital stay and complications such as infection and renal failure. Prior to our study, it was unclear whether or not children could also benefit from tight control of blood glucose during critical illness. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to determine if controlling blood glucose using insulin in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) reduces mortality and morbidity and is cost-effective, whether or not admission follows cardiac surgery. DESIGN Randomised open two-arm parallel group superiority design with central randomisation with minimisation. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. Following random allocation, care givers and outcome assessors were no longer blind to allocation. SETTING The setting was 13 English PICUs. PARTICIPANTS Patients who met the following criteria were eligible for inclusion: ≥ 36 weeks corrected gestational age; ≤ 16 years; in the PICU following injury, following major surgery or with critical illness; anticipated treatment > 12 hours; arterial line; mechanical ventilation; and vasoactive drugs. Exclusion criteria were as follows: diabetes mellitus; inborn error of metabolism; treatment withdrawal considered; in the PICU > 5 consecutive days; and already in CHiP (Control of Hyperglycaemia in Paediatric intensive care). INTERVENTION The intervention was tight glycaemic control (TGC): insulin by intravenous infusion titrated to maintain blood glucose between 4.0 and 7.0 mmol/l. CONVENTIONAL MANAGEMENT (CM) This consisted of insulin by intravenous infusion only if blood glucose exceeded 12.0 mmol/l on two samples at least 30 minutes apart; insulin was stopped when blood glucose fell below 10.0 mmol/l. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the number of days alive and free from mechanical ventilation within 30 days of trial entry (VFD-30). The secondary outcomes comprised clinical and economic outcomes at 30 days and 12 months and lifetime cost-effectiveness, which included costs per quality-adjusted life-year. RESULTS CHiP recruited from May 2008 to September 2011. In total, 19,924 children were screened and 1369 eligible patients were randomised (TGC, 694; CM, 675), 60% of whom were in the cardiac surgery stratum. The randomised groups were comparable at trial entry. More children in the TGC than in the CM arm received insulin (66% vs. 16%). The mean VFD-30 was 23 [mean difference 0.36; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.42 to 1.14]. The effect did not differ among prespecified subgroups. Hypoglycaemia occurred significantly more often in the TGC than in the CM arm (moderate, 12.5% vs. 3.1%; severe, 7.3% vs. 1.5%). Mean 30-day costs were similar between arms, but mean 12-month costs were lower in the TGC than in CM arm (incremental costs -£3620, 95% CI -£7743 to £502). For the non-cardiac surgery stratum, mean costs were lower in the TGC than in the CM arm (incremental cost -£9865, 95% CI -£18,558 to -£1172), but, in the cardiac surgery stratum, the costs were similar between the arms (incremental cost £133, 95% CI -£3568 to £3833). Lifetime incremental net benefits were positive overall (£3346, 95% CI -£11,203 to £17,894), but close to zero for the cardiac surgery stratum (-£919, 95% CI -£16,661 to £14,823). For the non-cardiac surgery stratum, the incremental net benefits were high (£11,322, 95% CI -£15,791 to £38,615). The probability that TGC is cost-effective is relatively high for the non-cardiac surgery stratum, but, for the cardiac surgery subgroup, the probability that TGC is cost-effective is around 0.5. Sensitivity analyses showed that the results were robust to a range of alternative assumptions. CONCLUSIONS CHiP found no differences in the clinical or cost-effectiveness of TGC compared with CM overall, or for prespecified subgroups. A higher proportion of the TGC arm had hypoglycaemia. This study did not provide any evidence to suggest that PICUs should stop providing CM for children admitted to PICUs following cardiac surgery. For the subgroup not admitted for cardiac surgery, TGC reduced average costs at 12 months and is likely to be cost-effective. Further research is required to refine the TGC protocol to minimise the risk of hypoglycaemic episodes and assess the long-term health benefits of TGC. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN61735247. FUNDING This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 18, No. 26. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Richard Grieve
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Allen
- Medical Statistics Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Zia Sadique
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Roger Parslow
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | | | - Mark L Duthie
- Glenfield Hospital and Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
| | | | | | - Paddy McMaster
- University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Mark J Peters
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | | | - Carla Guerriero
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Deborah Piercy
- Medical Statistics Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Claire Snowdon
- Medical Statistics Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Laura Van Dyck
- Medical Statistics Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Diana Elbourne
- Medical Statistics Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|