The association between iron deficiency and outcomes: a secondary analysis of the intravenous iron therapy to treat iron deficiency anaemia in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (PREVENTT) trial

In the intravenous iron therapy to treat iron deficiency anaemia in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (PREVENTT) trial, the use of intravenous iron did not reduce the need for blood transfusion or reduce patient complications or length of hospital stay. As part of the trial protocol, serum was collected at randomisation and on the day of surgery. These samples were analysed in a central laboratory for markers of iron deficiency. We performed a secondary analysis to explore the potential interactions between pre-operative markers of iron deficiency and intervention status on the trial outcome measures. Absolute iron deficiency was defined as ferritin <30 μg.l^-1 ; functional iron deficiency as ferritin 30-100 μg.l^-1 or transferrin saturation < 20%; and the remainder as non-iron deficient. Interactions were estimated using generalised linear models that included different subgroup indicators of baseline iron status. Co-primary endpoints were blood transfusion or death and number of blood transfusions, from randomisation to 30 days postoperatively. Secondary endpoints included peri-operative change in haemoglobin, postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. Most patients had iron deficiency (369/452 [82%]) at randomisation; one-third had absolute iron deficiency (144/452 [32%]) and half had functional iron deficiency (225/452 [50%]). The change in pre-operative haemoglobin with intravenous iron compared with placebo was greatest in patients with absolute iron deficiency, mean difference 8.9 g.l^-1 , 95%CI 5.3-12.5; moderate in functional iron deficiency, mean difference 2.8 g.l^-1 , 95%CI -0.1 to 5.7; and with little change seen in those patients who were non-iron deficient. Subgroup analyses did not suggest that intravenous iron compared with placebo reduced the likelihood of death or blood transfusion at 30 days differentially across subgroups according to baseline ferritin (p = 0.33 for interaction), transferrin saturation (p = 0.13) or in combination (p = 0.45), or for the number of blood transfusions (p = 0.06, 0.29, and 0.39, respectively). There was no beneficial effect of the use of intravenous iron compared with placebo, regardless of the metrics to diagnose iron deficiency, on postoperative complications or length of hospital stay.

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of paramedic administered fascia iliaca compartment block for emergency hip fracture (RAPID 2)-protocol for an individually randomised parallel-group trial

Background

Approximately 75,000 people fracture a hip each year in the UK. This painful injury can be devastating—with a high associated mortality rate—and survivors likely to be more dependent and less mobile. Pain relief at the scene of injury is known to be inadequate. Intravenous morphine is usually given by paramedics, but opioids are less effective for dynamic pain and can cause serious side effects, including nausea, constipation, delirium and respiratory depression. These may delay surgery, require further treatment and worsen patient outcomes. We completed a feasibility study of paramedic-provided fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB), testing the intervention, trial methods and data collection. The study (RAPID) demonstrated that a full trial was feasible. In this subsequent study, we aim to test safety, clinical and cost-effectiveness of paramedic-provided FICB as pain relief to patients with suspected hip fracture in the prehospital environment.

Methods

We will conduct a pragmatic multi-centre individually randomised parallel-group trial, with a 1:1 allocation between usual care (control) and FICB (intervention). Hospital clinicians in five sites (paired ambulance services and receiving hospitals) in England and Wales will train 220 paramedics to administer FICB. The primary outcome is change in pain score from pre-randomisation to arrival at the emergency department. One thousand four hundred patients are required to find a clinically important difference between trial arms in the primary outcome (standardised statistical effect ~ 0.2; 90% power, 5% significance). We will use NHS Digital (England) and the SAIL (Secure Anonymised Information Linkage) databank (Wales) to follow up patient outcomes using routine anonymised linked data in an efficient study design, and questionnaires to capture patient-reported outcomes at 1 and 4 months. Secondary outcomes include mortality, length of hospital stay, job cycle time, prehospital medications including morphine, presence of hip fracture, satisfaction, mobility, and NHS costs. We will assess safety by monitoring serious adverse events (SAEs).

Discussion

The trial will help to determine whether paramedic administered FICB is a safe, clinically and cost-effective treatment for suspected hip fracture in the pre-hospital setting. Impact will be shown if and when clinical guidelines either recommend or reject the use of FICB in routine practice in this context.

Trial registration

ISRCTN15831813. Registered on 22 September 2021.

TH5.8 Use of Botulinum Toxin A infiltration in conjunction with negative pressure wound dressing and mesh-mediated traction in the management of the ‘open abdomen’

Aims

Botulinum Toxin A (BTA) is widely used in complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR). It temporarily paralyses the oblique muscles allowing medialisation of the rectus sheath and decreases tension on the closure. This analysis presents the use of BTA in management of the ‘open abdomen’ (OA).

Methods

Retrospective series of patients with OA where BTA was used in conjunction with AbtheraTM negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and polypropylene mesh-mediated traction (MMT) to attempt fascial closure. BTA was performed by Anaesthetists with experience of BTA use in CAWR using Dysport® 600 IU.

Results

We include 5 patients since 2020. Median age at index operation was 55 years (range 39–81); four were male. Index operations were intra-abdominal catastrophe where fascia closure impossible (n=2), dehiscence after Vertical Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous (VRAM) flap for pelvic malignancy (n=2) and colectomy for obstructing colorectal cancer complicated by rectus sheath necrotising fasciitis (n=1). There were no immediate complications from BTA infiltration. All patients achieved primary fascial closure with a median of five re-looks (range 3–7). There were no full-thickness dehiscences after final closure. One patient died within 1 month from unrelated cause. One patient had no clinically palpable incisional hernia at six months and a further two had no incisional hernia at six and 12 months, respectively, on cancer surveillance CT.

Conclusion

BTA in the setting of the OA in conjunction with NPWT and MMT appears safe and effective in achieving fascial closure, and can potentially reduce the risk of incisional hernia. Further studies are welcomed.

"Should I Give it to My Kids?": Factors that Influence HPV Vaccine Hesitancy Among African American Parents

PURPOSE

The purpose of our study was to describe the influences that impact vaccine hesitancy in African American parents who have previously delayed or denied vaccinating their children against HPV.

METHODS

We conducted three focus groups, approx. 90 minutes each. Participants were recruited from various community clinics and organizations in Michigan. Using thematic analysis and the Vaccine Hesitancy Determinants framework, we described the experiences of parents who have delayed or denied vaccinating their children against HPV.

RESULTS

Twenty parents participated in the focus groups; the majority of the parents had Medicaid (75%), were employed full-time (55%), and had some college education but no degree (50%). Several contextual factors influenced decision-making: historical events, perceptions of both pharmaceutical and governmental figures, and perceived discrimination based on race and socioeconomic status. Whether it was the result of mistrust due to the ongoing Flint water crisis or concern over the profit-driven industry of pharmaceutical companies, these parents were deeply mistrustful of the motivations behind vaccination programs. Parental beliefs and attitudes focused on ensuring the health and safety of their children, which involved being hesitant to vaccinate. Some parents were swayed by vaccination experiences of personal acquaintances, while others maintained their hesitancy status. Knowledge and awareness in this group were mixed regarding the HPV vaccine. Most struggled to articulate the purpose of the vaccine thoroughly and often refused to vaccinate their children. Meanwhile, only a few vaccine-specific issues were relevant in group discussions, such as vaccination schedule and provider recommendation. Some parents viewed weak recommendations as a subtle signal to not vaccinate their children, while others viewed too strong of a recommendation as a cause for concern.

CONCLUSION

Findings highlight parents' willingness to stick with their strong beliefs, despite recommendations from healthcare providers and personal acquaintances. Effective communications strategies are essential for health education and establishing a trustworthy patient-provider relationship.

Well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic G3 NET: findings from a large single centre cohort

Neuroendocrine neoplasms are known to have heterogeneous biological behavior. G3 neuroendocrine tumours (NET G3) are characterized by well-differentiated morphology and Ki67 > 20%. The prognosis of this disease is understood to be intermediate between NET G2 and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Clinical management of NET G3 is challenging due to limited data to inform treatment strategies. We describe clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes in a large single centre cohort of patients with gastroenteropancreatic NET G3. Data was reviewed from 26 cases managed at Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK, from 2012 to 2019. Most commonly the site of the primary tumour was unknown and majority of cases with identifiable primaries originated in the GI tract. Majority of cases demonstrated somatostatin receptor avidity. Median Ki67 was 30%, and most cases had stage IV disease at diagnosis. Treatment options included surgery, somatostatin analogs (SSA), and chemotherapy with either platinum-based or temozolomide-based regimens. Estimated progression free survival was 4 months following initiation of SSA and 3 months following initiation of chemotherapy. Disease control was observed following treatment in 5/11 patients treated with chemotherapy. Estimated median survival was 19 months; estimated 1 year survival was 60% and estimated 2 year survival was 13%. NET G3 is a heterogeneous group of tumours and patients which commonly have advanced disease at presentation. Prognosis is typically poor, though select cases may respond to treatment with SSA and/or chemotherapy. Further study is needed to compare efficacy of different treatment strategies for this disease.

Prognostic implications of histological organ involvement in retroperitoneal sarcoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of histological organ involvement by retroperitoneal sarcoma subtype is unknown. The present study aimed to describe organ involvement across the subtypes, and the implications for survival.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for primary retroperitoneal sarcoma at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham from April 2005 to September 2018 were identified retrospectively. Histological organ involvement was classed as pushing, infiltrative or neither. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were produced to analyse the association between histological organ involvement and both overall (OS) and recurrence-free (RFS) survival for the cohort as a whole, and by histological subtype.

RESULTS

Data were available for a total of 197 patients, of whom 171 (86.8 per cent) had at least one organ resected. Infiltrative organ behaviour was seen in 37 patients (18.8 per cent), and pushing behaviour in 67 (34.0 per cent). For the cohort as a whole, infiltration (hazard ratio (HR) 4.32, 95 per cent c.i. 2.35 to 7.93; P < 0.001), but not pushing (HR 1.62, 0.90 to 2.92; P = 0.106), was associated with significantly shorter OS, in comparisons with a group with neither of these behaviours. However, this effect was found to differ significantly by histological subtype (P = 0.009). For patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma, there was no significant association between tumour behaviour and either OS (P = 0.508) or RFS (P = 0.313). However, in leiomyosarcoma, infiltrative behaviour was associated with shorter OS (P = 0.002), and both infiltrative (P < 0.001) and pushing (P = 0.010) behaviours were associated with shorter RFS, compared with tumours with neither behaviour. Multivariable analyses of both OS and RFS returned similar results.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic implications of organ involvement in retroperitoneal sarcoma vary by histological subtype.

Is fascia iliaca compartment block administered by paramedics for suspected hip fracture acceptable to patients? A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

To explore patients' experience of receiving pain relief injection for suspected hip fracture from paramedics at the location of the injury.

DESIGN

Qualitative interviews within a feasibility trial about an alternative to routine prehospital pain management for patients with suspected hip fracture.

SETTING

Patients treated by paramedics in the catchment area of one emergency department in South Wales.

PARTICIPANTS

Six patients and one carer of a patient who received fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB).

INTERVENTION

FICB administered to patients with suspected hip fracture by trained paramedics. We randomly allocated eligible patients to FICB-a local anaesthetic injection directly into the hip region-or usual care-most commonly morphine-using audited scratch cards.

OUTCOMES

Acceptability and experience of receiving FICB, assessed through interview data. We audio-recorded, with participants' consent, and conducted thematic analysis of interview transcripts. The analysis team comprised two researchers, one paramedic and one lay member.

RESULTS

Patients had little or no memory of being offered, consenting to or receiving FICB. They recalled the reassuring manner and high quality of care received. They accepted FICB without question. Partial or confused memory characterised experience of subsequent hospital care until surgery. They said their priorities when calling for emergency help were to receive effective care. After hospital treatment, they wanted to regain their health and mobility and resume the quality of life they experienced before their injury.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not raise any concerns about the acceptability of FICB administered at the scene of injury by paramedics to people with suspected hip fracture. It adds to existing evidence about patient and carer experience of on-scene care for people with suspected hip fracture. Further research is needed to assess safety, effectiveness and cost effectiveness of this health technology in a new setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN60065373.

Rapid Analgesia for Prehospital hip Disruption (RAPID): findings from a randomised feasibility study

Background

In managing hip fracture, effective pain relief before admission to hospital is difficult without risking side effects. Although emergency departments routinely use fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB), there has been little evaluation of its use by paramedics before hospital admission. We aimed to assess whether a multi-centre randomised trial to evaluate FICB was feasible.

Methods

Volunteer paramedics used scratchcards to allocate patients with hip fracture at random between FICB and pain relief as usual. Primary outcomes were mortality and quality of life. We also measured adverse events, costs, final diagnosis, length of stay in hospital, pain scores and quality of care and collected qualitative data about acceptability to patients in interviews, and paramedics in focus groups. We pre-specified criteria for deciding whether to progress to a fully powered trial based on the recruitment of paramedics and patients, delivery of FICB, retrieval of outcome data, safety, acceptability, and diagnostic accuracy of hip fracture.

Results

We effectively met all progression criteria: we recruited 19 paramedics who randomly allocated 71 patients between trial arms between 28 June 2016 and 31 July 2017; 57 (31 experimental arm, 26 usual care arm, 80% overall) retrospectively consented to follow-up. Just over half (17/31) of experimental participants received FICB; all others had contraindications, including nine taking anticoagulants. Four of the 31 participants assigned FICB and six of the 26 assigned usual care died within 6 months of hospital admission. Serious adverse events were also similar: 3/35 experimental versus 4/36 in usual care. Paramedics’ recognition of hip fracture had sensitivity of 49/64 (77%) with a positive predictive value of 46/57 (81%). We received quality of life questionnaires for 30 of 49 patients (61%) at 1 month and 12 of 17 (71%) at 6 months. Patient satisfaction was similar: experimental mean 3.4 (n = 20) versus 3.5 (n = 13) for usual care.

Conclusions

RAPID met all progression criteria within reasonable limits. As equipoise remains, we plan to undertake a fully powered multi-centre trial to test clinical and cost effectiveness of paramedic-administered FICB at the scene of hip fracture.

Trial registration

ISRCTN 60065373 sought 5 November 2015.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-019-0454-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Paramedics' experiences of administering fascia iliaca compartment block to patients in South Wales with suspected hip fracture at the scene of injury: results of focus groups

OBJECTIVES

To explore paramedics' experience of delivering fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) to patients with suspected hip fracture at the scene of injury.

DESIGN

Focus groups within a randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Paramedics based at ambulance stations in the catchment area of one Emergency Department in South Wales, recruited and trained in a feasibility study about an alternative to routine prehospital pain management for patients with suspected hip fracture.

PARTICIPANTS

11 paramedics.

INTERVENTION

Paramedic-administered FICB to patients with suspected hip fracture. We randomly allocated eligible patients to FICB, a local anaesthetic injection directly into the hip region-or usual care, most commonly morphine - using audited scratch cards.

OUTCOMES

Paramedics' experiences of administering FICB gathered through thematic analysis of interview transcripts by two researchers, one paramedic and one lay member.

RESULTS

Respondents believed that FICB was a suitable intervention for paramedics to deliver. It aligned with routine practice and was within people's capabilities. They said it took up to 10 minutes longer than usual care to prepare and deliver, in part due to nervousness and unfamiliarity with a new procedure. They praised the training provided but said they were anxious about causing harm by injecting into the wrong location. Confidence increased after one paramedic team successfully treated a patient for local anaesthetic toxicity. Reported challenges related to the emergency context: patients often waited many hours for ambulance arrival; moving patients exacerbated their pain; family and neighbours were present as paramedics administered treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Paramedics are willing and able to administer FICB to patients with suspected hip fracture before ambulance transport to hospital. Feasibility study findings will inform further research.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN60065373; Pre results.

PP30 ‘I can’t remember’ – patients views of receiving pain management from paramedics for suspected hip fracture

Background

Up to 40% of patients with suspected hip fracture report inadequate or no pre-hospital pain management. Morphine may raise risk of complications and may be avoided by paramedics. Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) is used in Emergency Department and orthopaedic wards. The RAPID trial tested feasibility of paramedics administering FICB to patients with suspected hip fracture.

Objective

To explore patients’ views and experience of care received for suspected hip fracture and in particular FICB before ambulance transport to hospital.

Method

We interviewed six patients and the daughter of a patient who received FICB to manage their suspected hip fracture. Interviews, by telephone or face-to-face, were audio-recorded with consent. We conducted thematic analysis of transcripts. Two researchers, one paramedic and one lay member were in the analysis team

Results

Respondents’ memory of prehospital care was dominated by their experience of extreme pain. While they recalled events before falling, they only had partial memory of care prior to hip surgery. Although they recalled paramedics’ arrival, which they reported was up to six hours after their injury, respondents said they remembered little else. Just one recalled consenting to receiving FICB and could describe the process. Other respondents said they were in too much pain to comprehend what occurred or respond coherently. They explained their priority was to receive pain management and they expected the paramedics to treat them safely and effectively. Respondents appeared to be a stoical and trusting group who accepted the treatment they were offered. They did recall high quality of care and praised paramedics for their reassuring and calm manner.

Conclusions

Hip fracture patients’ overwhelming memory of injury and treatment was of pain and their priority was to receive pain relief. The quality of care, reassurance and administration of pain management was more important to patients than the mechanism of delivering the intervention.

03 The use of scratchcards for allocation concealment and treatment allocation in a prehospital randomised controlled trial

Background

RAPID (Rapid Analgesia for Prehospital Hip Disruption) study was a small study to determine the feasibility of undertaking a randomised controlled trial to test the clinical and cost-effectiveness of paramedics administering Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) as early pain relief to patients who have fractured a hip at the scene of their injury.

Objectives

To devise a simple and effective method of random allocation concealment suitable for use by Paramedics whilst in the mobile emergency prehospital setting.

Methods

Traditional Methods of randomly allocating patients were considered, however none were suitable for paramedics to use during their shift. Scratchcards have been used successfully in other studies, though not prehospitally to our knowledge. Scratchcards were produced using scratch-off silver stickers which concealed the trial arm allocation. Paramedics were each allocated a unique range of consecutive numbers, used as both the scratchcard number and patient’s study ID. The cards were designed to allow the paramedic to write on the incident number, date and signature. A small envelope holding the cards was prepared for each paramedic.

Results

Nineteen trial paramedics used 71 scratchcards throughout the study and reported no problems randomly allocating patients using the scratchcards. Five protocol deviations reported in relation to scratchcard use. On auditing the scratchcards, all unused cards were located and no evidence of tampering with the silver panel was found.

Conclusion

Paramedics can use scratchcards as a method of randomly allocating patients in trials in prehospital care. In future a method that allows only the top card to be selected should be sought. Also a more protective method of storing the cards should be used. Scratchcards can be considered for wider use in randomised controlled trials in the emergency prehospital setting.

OP5 Rapid analgesia for prehospital hip disruption (RAPID): findings from a randomised feasibility study

Background

Adequate pain relief in prehospital care is a major challenge in all acute traumas, especially for those with hip fractures, whose injuries are difficult to immobilise and whose long term outcomes may be adversely affected by administration of opiate analgesics. Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) is routinely undertaken by clinicians in the emergency department for patients with hip fracture, but has not been fully evaluated for use by paramedics in prehospital care.

We aimed to test whether FICB for hip fracture pain relief carried out by paramedics in prehospital care was feasible, safe and acceptable, and whether trial Methods were viable, so that we could decide whether to proceed to a fully-powered RCT to evaluate clinical and cost effectiveness.

Methods

Nineteen paramedics were trained to administer FICB. They randomly allocated eligible patients to FICB or usual care using audited scratchcards. Patients were followed up to assess availability of key outcomes including quality of life, length of hospital stay, pain scores, and adverse events. Findings were analysed against pre-specified feasibility criteria to determine whether it was appropriate to progress to a fully-powered trial.

Results

Seventy-one patients were randomised by paramedics between 28/6/16 and 31/7/17; 57 of these patients consented to follow up. The only outcome which reached a statistically significant difference between groups was the proportion of participants who received morphine (38% difference between groups 95% CI −61.88 to −15.79). There was a difference of approximately nine days in the length of stay between trial arms (mean difference 9.12 (95% CI −20.51 to 2.27).

Conclusions

RAPID met its pre-specified progression criteria; a funding application for a fully-powered RCT will therefore be submitted. We will consider the use of length of stay as the primary outcome measure, as feasibility study findings indicated that there was a difference between groups without reaching statistical significance.

PP29 Paramedics’ experiences of administering fascia iliaca compartment block to patients with suspected hip fracture

Background

Routine pre-hospital pain management for hip fracture is inadequate, with risk of potentially fatal complications, particularly from morphine. Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) is used in Emergency Department and orthopaedic wards. The RAPID trial tested feasibility of paramedics administering FICB to patients with suspected hip fracture at the scene of injury.

Objective

To explore paramedics’ experience of delivering FICB pre-hospitally.

Methods

We held three focus groups with 11 paramedics serving one district hospital, audio-recorded with participants’ consent. We conducted thematic analysis of interview transcripts. Two researchers, one paramedic and one lay member were in the analysis team.

Results

Respondents believed FICB was a suitable intervention for paramedics to deliver. It aligned with their routine practice and was within people’s capabilities to administer, they reported. They said it took up to 10 min longer than usual care to prepare and deliver, in part due to nervousness and unfamiliarity with a new procedure. They praised the training provided but said they were anxious about causing harm by injecting into the wrong location. Confidence increased after one paramedic team successfully treated a patient for toxic reaction. Reported challenges related to the emergency context: patients often waited many hours for ambulance arrival; they sometimes needed to be moved from awkward locations which exacerbated pain; family and neighbours were present as paramedics administered treatment. Most respondents treated few or just one patient with FICB. Although uncertain whether FICB reduced patients’ pain more effectively than other pain relief options, respondents believed it was safer for elderly people at risk of pneumonia.

Conclusions

Paramedics are willing and able to administer FICB to patients with suspected hip fracture before ambulance transport to hospital. Feasibility study findings will inform a research proposal for a definitive multi-centre trial of paramedic administered prehospital FICB.

Use of scratchcards for allocation concealment in a prehospital randomised controlled trial

Background

Rapid Analgesia for Prehospital Hip Disruption was a small study designed to determine the feasibility of undertaking a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the clinical and cost-effectiveness of paramedics administering Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block as early prehospital pain relief to patients with a fractured hip. The objective was to devise a simple and effective method of random allocation concealment suitable for use by paramedics while in the emergency prehospital setting.

Methods

Scratchcards were produced using scratch-off silver stickers which concealed the trial arm allocation. Paramedics were each allocated a unique range of consecutive numbers, used as both the scratchcard number and the patient’s study ID. The cards were designed to allow the paramedic to write on the incident number, date and signature. A small envelope holding the cards was prepared for each paramedic. The study took place between 28 June 2016 and 31 July 2017 in the Swansea area.

Results

Nineteen trial paramedics used 71 scratchcards throughout the study and reported no problems randomly allocating patients using the scratchcards. Five protocol deviations were reported in relation to scratchcard use. On auditing the scratchcards, all unused cards were located, and no evidence of tampering with the silver panel was found.

Conclusion

Paramedics can use scratchcards as a method of randomly allocating patients in trials in prehospital care. In the future, a method that allows only the top card to be selected and a more protective method of storing the cards should be used. Scratchcards can be considered for wider use in RCTs in the emergency prehospital setting.

Trial registration number

ISRCTN60065373; Post-results.

Impact of specialist management on survival from radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast

BACKGROUND

Radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast (RAAS) is a rare complication of adjuvant radiotherapy associated with poor survival. The British Sarcoma Group guidelines recommend that all angiosarcomas are referred to a sarcoma multidisciplinary team, although there is no recommendation that patients are managed within a sarcoma service. The aims of this study were to compare survival, complete excision rates and local recurrence rates of patients managed within a sarcoma service and those managed within local hospitals.

METHODS

All patients with RAAS referred to a regional sarcoma service between 1998 and 2015 were identified from prospective databases. Patient records, and radiology, pathology and operation notes were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were operated on with curative intent; 26 were managed by the sarcoma service (of whom 21 underwent radical excision of the irradiated field followed by chest wall reconstruction) and ten were managed locally. Median age was 69·5 (range 43-85) years. Disease-specific survival was significantly longer in patients managed by the sarcoma service than in those managed locally: median 91·1 (range 69·2-113·0) versus 48·8 (18·6-79·1) months respectively (P = 0·012). Overall survival rates were similar (P = 0·112). There was no difference in complete excision rate (18 of 26 in sarcoma service versus 5 of 10 in local services; P = 0·456), although the local recurrence rate was significantly lower among patients managed by the sarcoma service (9 of 26 versus 8 of 10; P = 0·015).

CONCLUSION

Specialist management of RAAS leads to fewer local recurrences and improved disease-specific survival. Early referral and management within specialist units is recommended.

Rapid analgesia for prehospital hip disruption (RAPID): protocol for feasibility study of randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Adequate pain relief at the point of injury and during transport to hospital is a major challenge in all acute traumas, especially for those with hip fractures, whose injuries are difficult to immobilise and whose long-term outcomes may be adversely affected by administration of opiate analgesics. Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) is a procedure routinely undertaken by doctors and nurses in the emergency department for patients with hip fracture but not yet evaluated for use by paramedics at the scene of emergency calls. In this feasibility study, we aim to test whether FICB administered by paramedics at the scene of participants' hip fractures is feasible, safe and acceptable. This will enable us to decide whether to proceed to a fully powered, multi-centre pragmatic randomised trial to evaluate whether the procedure is effective for patients and worthwhile for the NHS.

METHODS/DESIGN

In this study, we propose to recruit ten paramedics in an urban area of South Wales. We will train them to carry out FICB when they attend patients with hip fracture. We will randomly allocate eligible patients to FICB or usual care using audited scratch cards. We will follow up participants to assess measurability of key outcomes including quality of life, pain scores, adverse events, length of stay in hospital, acceptability to patients and compliance of paramedics. We will assess whether the findings meet specified feasibility criteria and, if so, plan a full trial.

DISCUSSION

This study will enable us to recommend whether to undertake a definitive trial of FICB by paramedics for hip fracture.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN60065373.

How strict is galactose restriction in adults with galactosaemia? International practice

Dietary management of 418 adult patients with galactosaemia (from 39 centres/12 countries) was compared. All centres advised lactose restriction, 6 restricted galactose from galactosides ± fruits and vegetables and 12 offal. 38% (n=15) relaxed diet by: 1) allowing traces of lactose in manufactured foods (n=13) or 2) giving fruits, vegetables and galactosides (n=2). Only 15% (n=6) calculated dietary galactose. 32% of patients were lost to dietetic follow-up. In adult galactosaemia, there is limited diet relaxation.

Practices in prescribing protein substitutes for PKU in Europe: No uniformity of approach

BACKGROUND

There appears little consensus concerning protein requirements in phenylketonuria (PKU).

METHODS

A questionnaire completed by 63 European and Turkish IMD centres from 18 countries collected data on prescribed total protein intake (natural/intact protein and phenylalanine-free protein substitute [PS]) by age, administration frequency and method, monitoring, and type of protein substitute. Data were analysed by European region using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

The amount of total protein (from PS and natural/intact protein) varied according to the European region. Higher median amounts of total protein were prescribed in infants and children in Northern Europe (n=24 centres) (infants <1 year, >2-3g/kg/day; 1-3 years of age, >2-3 g/kg/day; 4-10 years of age, >1.5-2.5 g/kg/day) and Southern Europe (n=10 centres) (infants <1 year, 2.5 g/kg/day, 1-3 years of age, 2 g/kg/day; 4-10 years of age, 1.5-2 g/kg/day), than by Eastern Europe (n=4 centres) (infants <1 year, 2.5 g/kg/day, 1-3 years of age, >2-2.5 g/kg/day; 4-10 years of age, >1.5-2 g/kg/day) and with Western Europe (n=25 centres) giving the least (infants <1 year, >2-2.5 g/kg/day, 1-3 years of age, 1.5-2 g/kg/day; 4-10 years of age, 1-1.5 g/kg/day). Total protein prescription was similar in patients aged >10 years (1-1.5 g/kg/day) and maternal patients (1-1.5 g/kg/day).

CONCLUSIONS

The amounts of total protein prescribed varied between European countries and appeared to be influenced by geographical region. In PKU, all gave higher than the recommended 2007 WHO/FAO/UNU safe levels of protein intake for the general population.

The effect of needle dimensions and infusion rates on injection pressures in regional anaesthesia needles: a bench-top study

Animal studies have shown that injection pressures > 75 kPa indicate probable intrafascicular needle tip position. This study describes the flow/pressure characteristics of seven common needle systems. A syringe pump delivered flow rates of 5, 6.67, 10, 13.3, 15 and 20 ml.min(-1) through these needle systems, while keeping the needle tips open to atmosphere. A pressure transducer connected between the syringe and needle provided a real-time graphical display for analysis. Mean plateau pressures increased linearly with flow and with decreasing needle diameter (2.7-92 kPa). Flow rates > 17 ml.min(-1) and needle sizes 22 G and smaller produced mean plateau pressures > 75 kPa. Pressure monitors upstream from the needle may produce false-positive alarms at high flow rates due to needle resistance, and unreliable readings due to non-laminar flow. We recommend injection rates ≤ 15 ml.min(-1) (0.25 ml.s(-1) ) to reduce the effect of factors upstream from the needle tip as a cause of high pressure readings.

Elevated arsenic and manganese in groundwaters of Murshidabad, West Bengal, India

High levels of geogenic arsenic (As) and manganese (Mn) in drinking water has led to widespread health problems for the population of West Bengal, India. Here we delineate the extent of occurrences of As and Mn in Murshidabad, where the contaminated aquifers occur at shallow depths between 35 and 40 m and where access to safe drinking water is a critical issue for the local population. A total of 78 well-water samples were taken in 4 blocks on either side of the river Bhagirathi: Nabagram and Kandi (west, Pleistocene sediments), Hariharpara and Beldanga (east, Holocene sediments). High As, total iron (FeT) and low Mn concentrations were found in waters from the Holocene gray sediment aquifers east of the river Bhagirathi, while the opposite was found in the Pleistocene reddish-brown aquifer west of the river Bhagirathi in Murshidabad. Speciation of As in water samples from Holocene sediments revealed the dominant species to be As(III), with ratios of As(III):AsT ranging from 0.55 to 0.98 (average 0.74). There were indications from saturation index estimations that Mn solubility is limited by the precipitation of MnCO3. Tubewells from high As areas in proximity to anthropogenic waste influx sources showing high molar Cl/Br ratios, low SO4(2-) and low NO3(-) demonstrate relatively lower As concentrations, thereby reducing As pollution in those wells. Analyses of core samples (2 in each of the blocks) drilled to a depth of 45 m indicate that there is no significant variation in bulk As (5-20mg/kg) between the Holocene and Pleistocene sediments, indicating that favorable subsurface redox conditions conducive to mobilization are responsible for the release of As. The same applies to Mn, but concentrations vary more widely (20-2000 mg/kg). Sequential extraction of Holocene sediments showed As to be associated with 'specifically sorbed-phosphate-extractable' phases (10-15%) and with 'amorphous and well crystalline Fe-oxyhydroxide' phases (around 37%) at As-contaminated well depths, suggesting that the main As release mechanisms could be either competitive ion exchange with PO4(3-), or the dissolution of Fe oxyhydroxides. In the Pleistocene sediments Mn is predominantly found in the easily exchangeable fraction.

Neurosensory assessments of migraine

Headache medicine is primarily dependent on patients' subjective reports of pain, which are assessed at diagnosis and throughout the duration of treatment. There is a need for an objective, quantitative biological measurement of headache pain severity. In this study, quantitative sensory testing (QST) was conducted via multi-site vibrotactile stimulation in patients with migraine. The purpose was to investigate the sensitivity of the method and to determine if the metrics obtained from migraineurs could be differentiated from controls. Metrics reflecting sensory percepts of baseline measures of stimulus amplitude discrimination, temporal order judgment, and duration discrimination were significantly different. Additional measures previously demonstrated to be sensitive to alterations in centrally-mediated information processing features such as adaptation and synchronization were also significantly different from control values. In contrast, reaction times and vibrotactile detection thresholds of migraineurs failed to differentiate them from controls, indicating that the results are not due to peripheral neuropathy or some other primary afferent mechanism. The long-term objective of the study is to develop methods that can improve diagnosis and enable more accurate assessments of treatment efficacy in migraine.

Phase I dose-escalation study to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of brivanib alaninate in combination with full-dose cetuximab in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies who have failed prior therapy

Background:

The objectives of this phase I study were to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics and efficacy of brivanib combined with full-dose cetuximab in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies.

Methods:

Patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies who had failed prior therapies received brivanib (320, 600 or 800 mg daily) plus cetuximab (400 mg m^–2 loading dose then 250 mg m^–2 weekly). Assessments included adverse events, PK, tumour response, 2[18F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron-emitting tomography and K-Ras mutation analyses.

Results:

Toxicities observed were manageable; the most common treatment-related toxicities (>10% of patients) were fatigue, diarrhoea, anorexia, increase in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase, acneiform dermatitis, headache, mucosal inflammation, nausea, dry skin, vomiting, hypertension, pruritus, proteinuria and weight loss. Of 62 patients, 6 (9.7%) had objective radiographic partial responses, with an overall response rate of 10%. Median duration of response was 9.2 months; median progression-free survival was 3.9 months.

Conclusions:

The acceptable toxicity profile and efficacy of brivanib observed in this study were promising. These findings are being further evaluated in a phase III study of brivanib plus cetuximab vs cetuximab alone in patients previously treated with combination chemotherapy for K-Ras wild-type advanced metastatic colorectal cancer.

At-a-glance monitoring: covert observations of anesthesiologists in the operating room

BACKGROUND

Patient monitoring displays are designed to improve patient safety, and yet little is known about how anesthesiologists interact with these displays. Previous studies of clinician behavior used an observer in the operating room, which may have altered behavior. We describe a covert observation technique to determine how often and for how long anesthesiologists actually look at the monitoring display during different segments of the maintenance phase of anesthesia, and to determine whether this changed with more than 1 anesthesia provider or during concomitant activities such as reading.

METHODS

Five staff anesthesiologists, 2 anesthesia fellows, 3 anesthesia residents, and 2 medical students were covertly videotaped across 10 dual anesthesia provider cases and 10 solo cases. Videotapes were later segmented (5 minutes postinduction [early maintenance], mid-maintenance, and immediately before the drapes came down [late maintenance]) and coded for looking behavior at the patient monitor, anesthesia chart, and other reading material.

RESULTS

Anesthesiologists looked at the monitor in 1- to 2-second glances, performed frequently throughout the 3 segments of maintenance anesthesia. Overall, the patient monitor was looked at only 5 of the analyzed time, which is less than has previously been reported. Monitoring behavior was constant across the segments of maintenance anesthesia and was not significantly affected by the number of anesthesia providers or role (trainee vs. senior). In contrast, charting behavior and other reading material viewing changed significantly over the analyzed segments of maintenance anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of "at-a-glance monitoring" has implications for the design of patient monitoring displays. Displays should be developed to optimize the information obtained from brief glances at the monitor.