2
|
Ledger L, Worsley P, Hope J, Schoonhoven L. Patient involvement in pressure ulcer prevention and adherence to prevention strategies: An integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud 2019; 101:103449. [PMID: 31706155 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2019] [Revised: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic wounds including pressure ulcers represent a significant burden to patients and healthcare providers. Increasingly patients are required to self-manage their care but patient adherence to prevention strategies is a significant clinical challenge. It is important to increase understanding of the factors affecting patients' ability and willingness to follow pressure ulcer prevention interventions. OBJECTIVES To investigate from a patient perspective the factors affecting adherence to pressure ulcer prevention strategies. DESIGN Integrative literature review. DATA SOURCES A systematic search of electronic databases (Athens, Pub Med, Web of Science, Science Direct, AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PsychInfo, Google Scholar, Delphis) was initially conducted in May 2017 (repeated August 2018). REVIEW METHODS The methodological quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) principles. The Noticing, Collecting, Thinking (NCT) model of qualitative data analysis was used to identify key themes. RESULTS A total of twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The majority of studies were qualitative and three key themes were identified: (i) individual/daily lifestyle considerations, (ii) patient involvement in the decision-making process, and (iii) pain and/or discomfort. CONCLUSION There is limited research that focuses on the patient view of factors affecting adherence to prevention measures, particularly in community settings. Individual and daily lifestyle considerations and involvement in decision-making around pressure ulcer care are important aspects from the patient perspective. Further research is necessary to explore which factors affect patient adherence in order to improve clinical practice and support patient involvement in preventative strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Worsley
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Jo Hope
- School of Health Sciences, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Lisette Schoonhoven
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environment and life Sciences, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ge B, Domesle KJ, Yang Q, Hammack TS, Wang SS, Deng X, Hu L, Zhang G, Hu Y, Lai X, Chou KX, Dollete JR, Hirneisen KA, La SP, Richter RS, Rai DR, Yousefvand AA, Park PK, Wu CH, Eames T, Kiang D, Sheng J, Wu D, Hahn L, Ledger L, Logie C, You Q, Slavic D, Cai H, Ayers SL, Young SR, Pamboukian R. Multi-Laboratory Validation of a Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method for Screening Salmonella in Animal Food. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:562. [PMID: 30984125 PMCID: PMC6447708 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) has gained wide popularity in the detection of Salmonella in foods owing to its simplicity, rapidity, and robustness. This multi-laboratory validation (MLV) study aimed to validate a Salmonella LAMP-based method against the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Chapter 5 Salmonella reference method in a representative animal food matrix (dry dog food). Fourteen independent collaborators from seven laboratories in the United States and Canada participated in the study. Each collaborator received two sets of 24 blind-coded dry dog food samples (eight uninoculated; eight inoculated at a low level, 0.65 MPN/25 g; and eight inoculated at a high level, 3.01 MPN/25 g) and initiated the testing on the same day. The MLV study used an unpaired design where different test portions were analyzed by the LAMP and BAM methods using different preenrichment protocols (buffered peptone water for LAMP and lactose broth for BAM). All LAMP samples were confirmed by culture using the BAM method. BAM samples were also tested by LAMP following lactose broth preenrichment (paired samples). Statistical analysis was carried out by the probability of detection (POD) per AOAC guidelines and by a random intercept logistic regression model. Overall, no significant differences in POD between the Salmonella LAMP and BAM methods were observed with either unpaired or paired samples, indicating the methods were comparable. LAMP testing following preenrichment in buffered peptone water or lactose broth also resulted in insignificant POD differences (P > 0.05). The MLV study strongly supports the utility and applicability of this rapid and reliable LAMP method in routine regulatory screening of Salmonella in animal food.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beilei Ge
- Division of Animal and Food Microbiology, Office of Research, Center for Veterinary Medicine, United States Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD, United States
| | - Kelly J. Domesle
- Division of Animal and Food Microbiology, Office of Research, Center for Veterinary Medicine, United States Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD, United States
| | - Qianru Yang
- Division of Animal and Food Microbiology, Office of Research, Center for Veterinary Medicine, United States Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD, United States
| | - Thomas S. Hammack
- Office of Regulatory Science, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, United States Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, United States
| | - Shizhen S. Wang
- Office of Analytics and Outreach, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, United States Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, United States
| | - Xiaohong Deng
- Office of Regulatory Science, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, United States Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, United States
| | - Lijun Hu
- Office of Regulatory Science, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, United States Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, United States
| | - Guodong Zhang
- Office of Regulatory Science, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, United States Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, United States
| | - Yuan Hu
- Northeast Food and Feed Laboratory, Office of Regulatory Affairs, United States Food and Drug Administration, Jamaica, NY, United States
| | - Xiaokuang Lai
- Northeast Food and Feed Laboratory, Office of Regulatory Affairs, United States Food and Drug Administration, Jamaica, NY, United States
| | - Kyson X. Chou
- Pacific Southwest Food and Feed Laboratory, Office of Regulatory Affairs, United States Food and Drug Administration, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Jan Ryan Dollete
- Pacific Southwest Food and Feed Laboratory, Office of Regulatory Affairs, United States Food and Drug Administration, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Kirsten A. Hirneisen
- Pacific Southwest Food and Feed Laboratory, Office of Regulatory Affairs, United States Food and Drug Administration, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Sammie P. La
- Pacific Southwest Food and Feed Laboratory, Office of Regulatory Affairs, United States Food and Drug Administration, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Richelle S. Richter
- Pacific Southwest Food and Feed Laboratory, Office of Regulatory Affairs, United States Food and Drug Administration, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Diyo R. Rai
- San Francisco Laboratory, Office of Regulatory Affairs, United States Food and Drug Administration, Alameda, CA, United States
| | - Azadeh A. Yousefvand
- San Francisco Laboratory, Office of Regulatory Affairs, United States Food and Drug Administration, Alameda, CA, United States
| | - Paul K. Park
- Food and Drug Laboratory Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA, United States
| | - Cindy H. Wu
- Food and Drug Laboratory Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA, United States
| | - Tameji Eames
- Food and Drug Laboratory Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA, United States
| | - David Kiang
- Food and Drug Laboratory Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA, United States
| | - Ju Sheng
- Office of Indiana State Chemist, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States
| | - Dancia Wu
- Office of Indiana State Chemist, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States
| | - Lori Hahn
- Animal Health Laboratory, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Lisa Ledger
- Animal Health Laboratory, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Cynthia Logie
- Animal Health Laboratory, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Qiu You
- Animal Health Laboratory, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Durda Slavic
- Animal Health Laboratory, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Hugh Cai
- Animal Health Laboratory, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Sherry L. Ayers
- Division of Animal and Food Microbiology, Office of Research, Center for Veterinary Medicine, United States Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD, United States
| | - Shenia R. Young
- Division of Animal and Food Microbiology, Office of Research, Center for Veterinary Medicine, United States Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD, United States
| | - Ruiqing Pamboukian
- Office of Regulatory Science, Office of Regulatory Affairs, United States Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|