Mechanism of Action of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs): impact of delivery method

INTRODUCTION

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs; AKA mesenchymal stem cells) stimulate healing and reduce inflammation. Promising therapeutic responses are seen in many late-phase clinical trials, but others have not satisfied their primary endpoints, making translation of MSCs into clinical practice difficult. These inconsistencies may be related to the route of MSC delivery, lack of product optimization, or varying background therapies received in clinical trials over time.

AREAS COVERED

Here we discuss the different routes of MSC delivery, highlighting the proposed mechanism(s) of therapeutic action as well as potential safety concerns. PubMed search criteria used: MSC plus: local administration; routes of administration; delivery methods; mechanism of action; therapy in different diseases.

EXPERT OPINION

Direct injection of MSCs using a controlled local delivery approach appears to have benefits in certain disease states, but further studies are required to make definitive conclusions regarding the superiority of one delivery method over another.

Sustained IGF-1 Secretion by Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Improves Infarcted Heart Function

The mechanism by which stem cell-based therapy improves heart function is still unknown, but paracrine mechanisms seem to be involved. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) secrete several factors, including insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), which may contribute to myocardial regeneration. Our aim was to investigate whether the overexpression of IGF-1 in ADSCs (IGF-1-ADSCs) improves treatment of chronically infarcted rat hearts. ADSCs were transduced with a lentiviral vector to induce IGF-1 overexpression. IGF-1-ADSCs transcribe100- to 200-fold more IGF-1 mRNA levels compared to nontransduced ADSCs. IGF-1 transduction did not alter ADSC immunophenotypic characteristics even under hypoxic conditions. However, IGF-1-ADSCs proliferate at higher rates and release greater amounts of growth factors such as IGF-1, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Importantly, IGF-1 secreted by IGF-1-ADSCs is functional given that Akt-1 phosphorylation was remarkably induced in neonatal cardiomyocytes cocultured with IGF-1-ADSCs, and this increase was prevented with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor treatment. Next, we tested IGF-1-ADSCs in a rat myocardial infarction (MI) model. MI was performed by coronary ligation, and 4 weeks after MI, animals received intramyocardial injections of either ADSCs (n = 7), IGF-1-ADSCs (n = 7), or vehicle (n = 7) into the infarcted border zone. Left ventricular function was evaluated by echocardiography before and after 6 weeks of treatment, and left ventricular hemodynamics were assessed 7 weeks after cell injection. Notably, IGF-1-ADSCs improved left ventricular ejection fraction and cardiac contractility index, but did not reduce scar size when compared to the ADSC-treated group. In summary, transplantation of ADSCs transduced with IGF-1 is a superior therapeutic approach to treat MI compared to nontransduced ADSCs, suggesting that gene and cell therapy may bring additional benefits to the treatment of MI.

Growth hormone-releasing hormone agonists reduce myocardial infarct scar in swine with subacute ischemic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Growth hormone-releasing hormone agonists (GHRH-As) stimulate cardiac repair following myocardial infarction (MI) in rats through the activation of the GHRH signaling pathway within the heart. We tested the hypothesis that the administration of GHRH-As prevents ventricular remodeling in a swine subacute MI model.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twelve female Yorkshire swine (25 to 30 kg) underwent transient occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (MI). Two weeks post MI, swine were randomized to receive injections of either 30 μg/kg GHRH-A (MR-409) (GHRH-A group; n=6) or vehicle (placebo group; n=6). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and pressure-volume loops were obtained at multiple time points. Infarct, border, and remote (noninfarcted) zones were assessed for GHRH receptor by immunohistochemistry. Four weeks of GHRH-A treatment resulted in reduced scar mass (GHRH-A: -21.9 ± 6.42%; P=0.02; placebo: 10.9 ± 5.88%; P=0.25; 2-way ANOVA; P=0.003), and scar size (percentage of left ventricular mass) (GHRH-A: -38.38 ± 4.63; P=0.0002; placebo: -14.56 ± 6.92; P=0.16; 2-way ANOVA; P=0.02). This was accompanied by improved diastolic strain. Unlike in rats, this reduced infarct size in swine was not accompanied by improved cardiac function as measured by serial hemodynamic pressure-volume analysis. GHRH receptors were abundant in cardiac tissue, with a greater density in the border zone of the GHRH-A group compared with the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Daily subcutaneous administration of GHRH-A is feasible and safe in a large animal model of subacute ischemic cardiomyopathy. Furthermore, GHRH-A therapy significantly reduced infarct size and improved diastolic strain, suggesting a local activation of the GHRH pathway leading to the reparative process.

Abstract 128: Pim1 kinase Overexpression Enhances ckit+ Cardiac Stem Cells Cardioreparative Ability After Intramyocardial Delivery

Background: Pim-1 kinase plays an important role in cell division, survival and commitment towards myocardial lineage. We hypothesized that Pim-1 overexpression in ckit+ cardiac stem cell (CSCs) enhances cardioreparative effects.

Methods: Immunosuppressed Yorkshire swine (n=31) received human ckit+ CSCs (n=9), Pim1 modified human ckit+ CSCs (n=9) or PBS (n=13) two weeks after myocardial infarction. Cardiac MRI and PV loops were obtained before and after cell administration.

Results: At 8 weeks post transplantation, scar mass (Fig. 1A), viable tissue (Fig. 1B), ejection fraction (Fig. 1C) and stroke work (Fig. 1D) was significantly improved in Pim-1 modified ckit+ CSC compared to control ckit+, while both cell groups showed partial recovery compared to placebo (two way ANOVA, p<0.05). Both cell types similarly reduced preload (end diastolic pressure; Fig. 1E) and afterload (Arterial elastance; Fig 1F) compared to placebo, while only administration of Pim-1 CPCs improved regional contractility at both the infarct (Fig. 1G) and border zones (Fig. 1H). Collectively, mechanoenergetic recoupling was superior in the Pim-1 group compared to ckit+ controls (Cardiac Efficiency; Fig. 1I).

Conclusions: Cardioreparative potential of CSCs delivered by intramyocardial injection to infarcted porcine hearts is significantly enhanced by overexpress Pim1, supporting translational development of Pim-1 as a validated genetic modification of CSCs for incorporation into clinical trials.

Abstract 214: Reduction of Scar Tissue after GHRH-A Treatment in a Swine Model of Sub-acute Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Background: Growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor agonists (GHRH-A) stimulate cardiac repair following myocardial infarction (MI) through the activation of the GHRH signaling pathway within the heart. We tested the hypothesis that the administration of GHRH-A prevents ventricular remodeling in a swine sub-acute MI model.

Methods: Twelve female Yorkshire swine (25-30 Kg) underwent transient occlusion of the LAD coronary artery (MI). Two-weeks post-MI, swine were randomized to receive injections of either 30 μg/Kg GHRH-A (MR-409) (GHRH-A group; n=6) or vehicle (placebo group; n=6). Cardiac MRI, pressure volume loops and measures of endothelial function were obtained at multiple time points. Infarct-, border- and remote- (non-infarcted) zones were assessed by immunohistochemistry for the growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor (GHRHR).

Results: Four-weeks of GHRH-A treatment resulted in reduced scar mass (GHRH-A group: –21.9±6.42%; p=0.02; placebo group: 10.9±5.88%; p=0.25; Two-way ANOVA; p=0.003), and reduced scar size (percent of left ventricle mass) (GHRH-A group: –38.38±4.63; p=0.0002; placebo group: –14.56± 6.92; p=0.16; Two-way ANOVA; p=0.02). Moreover, peripheral endothelial function was significantly increased compared to baseline values in the GHRH-A group (paired t-test; p=0.006) but not in the placebo group (p=0.99). Unlike in rats, this reduced infarct size in swine was not accompanied by improved cardiac function as measured by serial hemodynamic pressure-volume analysis. GHRH receptors were abundant in cardiac tissue, with a greater density in the border zone of the GHRH-A group compared to the placebo group. These data support the concept of direct post-infarction activation of cardiac signal transduction, and of enhancing this activation with systemic treatment by GHRH.

Conclusions: Daily subcutaneous administration of GHRH-A is feasible and safe in female swine. Furthermore, GHRH-A therapy significantly reduced infarct size and increased endothelial function, suggesting that a local activation of the GHRH pathway leads to the regenerative process and preservation of peripheral endothelial function.