Patient Satisfaction With a Multisite, Multiregional Remote Patient Monitoring Program for Acute and Chronic Condition Management: Survey-Based Analysis

BACKGROUND

Remote patient monitoring (RPM) is an option for continuously managing the care of patients in the comfort of their homes or locations outside hospitals and clinics. Patient engagement with RPM programs is essential for achieving successful outcomes and high quality of care. When relying on technology to facilitate monitoring and shifting disease management to the home environment, it is important to understand the patients' experiences to enable quality improvement.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe patients' experiences and overall satisfaction with an RPM program for acute and chronic conditions in a multisite, multiregional health care system.

METHODS

Between January 1, 2021, and August 31, 2022, a patient experience survey was delivered via email to all patients enrolled in the RPM program. The survey encompassed 19 questions across 4 categories regarding comfort, equipment, communication, and overall experience, as well as 2 open-ended questions. Descriptive analysis of the survey response data was performed using frequency distribution and percentages.

RESULTS

Surveys were sent to 8535 patients. The survey response rate was 37.16% (3172/8535) and the completion rate was 95.23% (3172/3331). Survey results indicated that 88.97% (2783/3128) of participants agreed or strongly agreed that the program helped them feel comfortable managing their health from home. Furthermore, 93.58% (2873/3070) were satisfied with the RPM program and ready to graduate when meeting the program goals. In addition, patient confidence in this model of care was confirmed by 92.76% (2846/3068) of the participants who would recommend RPM to people with similar conditions. There were no differences in ease of technology use according to age. Those with high school or less education were more likely to agree that the equipment and educational materials helped them feel more informed about their care plans than those with higher education levels.

CONCLUSIONS

This multisite, multiregional RPM program has become a reliable health care delivery model for the management of acute and chronic conditions outside hospitals and clinics. Program participants reported an excellent overall experience and a high level of satisfaction in managing their health from the comfort of their home environment.

Development and implementation of a nurse-based remote patient monitoring program for ambulatory disease management

Introduction

Numerous factors are intersecting in healthcare resulting in an increased focus on new tools and methods for managing care in patients' homes. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) is an option to provide care at home and maintain a connection between patients and providers to address ongoing medical issues.

Methods

Mayo Clinic developed a nurse-led RPM program for disease and post-procedural management to improve patient experience, clinical outcomes, and reduce health care utilization by more directly engaging patients in their health care. Enrolled patients are sent a technology package that includes a digital tablet and peripheral devices for the collection of symptoms and vital signs. The data are transmitted from to a hub integrated within the electronic health record. Care team members coordinate patient needs, respond to vital sign alerts, and utilize the data to inform and provide individualized patient assessment, patient education, medication management, goal setting, and clinical care planning.

Results

Since its inception, the RPM program has supported nearly 22,000 patients across 17 programs. Patients who engaged in the COVID-19 RPM program experienced a significantly lower rate of 30-day, all-cause hospitalization (13.7% vs. 18.0%, P = 0.01), prolonged hospitalization >7 days (3.5% vs. 6.7%, P = 0.001), intensive care unit (ICU) admission (2.3% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.01), and mortality (0.5% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.01) when compared with those enrolled and unengaged with the technology. Patients with chronic conditions who were monitored with RPM upon hospital discharge were significantly less likely to experience 30-day readmissions (18.2% vs. 23.7%, P = 0.03) compared with those unmonitored. Ninety-five percent of patients strongly agreed or agreed they were likely to recommend RPM to a friend or family member.

Conclusions

The Mayo Clinic RPM program has generated positive clinical outcomes and is satisfying for patients. As technology advances, there are greater opportunities to enhance this clinical care model and it should be extended and expanded to support patients across a broader spectrum of needs. This report can serve as a framework for health care organizations to implement and enhance their RPM programs in addition to identifying areas for further evolution and exploration in developing RPM programs of the future.

Prospective evaluation of smartwatch-enabled detection of left ventricular dysfunction

Although artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been shown to be capable of identifying cardiac dysfunction, defined as ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 40%, from 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs), identification of cardiac dysfunction using the single-lead ECG of a smartwatch has yet to be tested. In the present study, a prospective study in which patients of Mayo Clinic were invited by email to download a Mayo Clinic iPhone application that sends watch ECGs to a secure data platform, we examined patient engagement with the study app and the diagnostic utility of the ECGs. We digitally enrolled 2,454 unique patients (mean age 53 ± 15 years, 56% female) from 46 US states and 11 countries, who sent 125,610 ECGs to the data platform between August 2021 and February 2022; 421 participants had at least one watch-classified sinus rhythm ECG within 30 d of an echocardiogram, of whom 16 (3.8%) had an EF ≤ 40%. The AI algorithm detected patients with low EF with an area under the curve of 0.885 (95% confidence interval 0.823-0.946) and 0.881 (0.815-0.947), using the mean prediction within a 30-d window or the closest ECG relative to the echocardiogram that determined the EF, respectively. These findings indicate that consumer watch ECGs, acquired in nonclinical environments, can be used to identify patients with cardiac dysfunction, a potentially life-threatening and often asymptomatic condition.

Indication for Active Surveillance in the Era of MRI-Targeted Prostate Biopsies

INTRODUCTION

Active surveillance (AS) strategies were established to avoid overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Low tumor volume represents one indication criteria; however, applying this criterion after MRI-targeted prostate biopsies may lead to overestimation of tumor volume; wherefore, patients suitable for AS would be exposed to the risk of overtreatment.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 318 patients in which PCa was detected by MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy. Classic and extended indication for AS included Gleason 6 and Gleason 3 + 4 cancer, respectively. We assessed the effect of targeted biopsies and temporary rating strategies on eligibility for AS and developed new "composite" algorithms to more accurately assess eligibility for AS.

RESULTS

Forty-four (13.8%) and 60 (18.9%) of the 318 patients qualified for AS according to "classic" and "extended" criteria, respectively. Application of the "composite 1" definition led to AS eligibility of 52 of 248 patients (20.97%) in the classic and of 77 of 248 patients (31.05%) in the "extended" group.

CONCLUSIONS

We could demonstrate that classic algorithms led to ineligibility of patients for AS. We propose a new rating algorithm to improve tumor assessment for a more accurate indication for AS.

68Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography-Based Primary Staging and Histological Correlation after Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT)-based primary staging in exclusively D'Amico intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We relied on the Braunschweig institutional database and retrospectively identified D'Amico intermediate-risk PCa patients who were administered to 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-based primary staging prior to consecutive radical prostatectomy and extended lymph node dissection. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for the detection of lymph node metastases were analyzed per-patient (n = 39), per-pelvic side (n = 78), and per-anatomic-region (external iliac artery and vein left/right vs. obturator fossa left/right vs. internal iliac artery left/right) (n = 203), respectively.

RESULTS

Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV per-patient were 20.0, 94.1, 33.3, and 88.9%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV per-pelvic-side were 16.7, 97.2, 33.3, and 93.3%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV per-anatomic-region were 16.7, 99.0, 33.3, and 97.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We recorded high rates of specificity and NPV for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-based primary staging in D'Amico intermediate-risk PCa patients. Conversely, the sensitivity and PPV were lower than anticipated. Larger and favorably prospective trials are needed to verify our results and to unravel possible bias from such smaller studies.

Adherence to the EAU Guideline Recommendations for Local Tumor Treatment in Penile Cancer: Results of the European PROspective Penile Cancer Study Group Survey (E-PROPS)

Introduction

Penile cancer (PeCa) is an orphan disease in European countries. The current guidelines are predominantly based on retrospective studies with a low level of evidence. In our study, we aimed to identify predictors for guideline-conform treatment and hypothesize that reference centers for PeCa and physicians' experience promote guideline compliance and therefore correct local tumor therapy.

Methods

This study is part of the European PROspective Penile Cancer Study (E-PROPS), an international collaboration group evaluating therapeutic management for PeCa in Central Europe. For this module, a 14-item-survey was developed and sent to 681 urologists in 45 European centers. Three questions focused on therapeutic decisions for PeCa in clinical stage Tis, Ta-T1a, and T1b. Four questions addressed potential personal confounders. Survey results were analyzed by bootstrap-adjusted stepwise multivariate linear regression analysis to identify predictors for EAU guideline-conform local treatment of PeCa.

Results

For local therapy of cTis 80.4% recommended guideline-conform treatment, for cTa-cT1a 87.3% and for cT1b 59.1%. In total, 42.4% chose a correct approach in all tumor stages. The number of PeCa patients treated at the hospital, a higher level of training of the physicians, resource-based answering and the option of penile-sparing surgery offered at the hospital matched with giving guideline-conform recommendations and thus accurate local tumor treatment.

Conclusion

Patients with PeCa are best treated by experienced physicians, in centers with a high number of cases, which also offer a wide range of local tumor therapy. This could be offered in reference centers.

Elastography Targeted Prostate Biopsy in Patients under Active Surveillance

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine elastography-based prostate biopsy in prostate cancer (PCa) patients under active surveillance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We relied on PCa patients who opted for active surveillance and underwent elastography targeted and systematic follow-up biopsy at the Braunschweig Prostate Cancer Center between October 2009 and February 2015. Each prostate sextant was considered as an individual case. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy (ACC) for elastography to predict follow-up biopsy results were analyzed, respectively, and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were carried out by using 2000 bootstrapping sample analyses.

RESULTS

Overall, 50 men and 300 sextants were identified. Overall, 27 (54%) men and 66 (22%) sextants harbored PCa at follow-up biopsy. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and ACC for elastography to predict follow-up biopsy results were: 19.7 (95% CI: 11.9-27.3), 86.8 (95% CI: 82.7-90.3), 29.6 (95% CI: 14.6-46.0), 79.3 (95% CI: 71.6-86.5), and 72.0% (95% CI: 65.7-78.3), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We recorded limited reliability of elastography-based prediction of follow-up biopsy results in active surveillance patients. Based on our analyses, we can neither recommend to rely exclusively on elastography-based targeted biopsies nor to delay or to omit follow-up biopsies based on elastography results during active surveillance.

[Docetaxel or abiraterone in combination with androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic prostate cancer]

BACKGROUND

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone has long been the standard of care in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (mCSPC). A paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with mCSPC has now been initiated by the results of three major phase 3 clinical trials (CHAARTED, STAMPEDE, LATITUDE): They demonstrated a significant advantage of ADT in combination with docetaxel or abiraterone/prednisone over ADT alone.

OBJECTIVES

This review presents the current evidence for the use of docetaxel or abiraterone/prednisone in combination with ADT and discusses-in the absence of directly comparing studies-which patients may have an advantage of ADT plus abiraterone/prednisone over ADT plus docetaxel or vice versa.

METHODS

A systematic review based on bibliographic literature search was conducted.

RESULTS

Both the combinations of ADT with docetaxel and with abiraterone/prednisone represent a major advance in the treatment of patients with mCSPC, in particular of patients with multiple metastases. Compared to chemotherapy, the use of abiraterone in addition to ADT avoids (rare) neutropenic complications and treatment-associated deaths. Long-term oral treatment with abiraterone/prednisone as a complementary therapy to ADT replaces short-term intravenous treatment (docetaxel).

CONCLUSION

In patients with mCSPC, ADT plus docetaxel or ADT plus abiraterone/prednisone is recommended. In particular in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease, ADT should be considered with a GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) antagonist to reduce the risk of cardiotoxic side effects.

Only Size Matters in Stone Patients: Computed Tomography Controlled Stone-Free Rates after Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

OBJECTIVE

To examine and predicting stone-free rates (SFRs) after minimally invasive-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PNL) based on computed tomography (CT), instead of X-ray or ultrasound control.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 146 mini-PNL patients with pre- and postoperative CT scans. Patient and stone characteristics were assessed. Stone-free status was defined as ≤3 mm residual fragment after mini-PNL according to postsurgery CT scan. Multivariable logistic regression analyses predicted stone-free status after mini-PNL.

RESULTS

Overall, 62 (42.5%) patients achieved stone-free status after mini-PNL. In multivariable analyses, stone size was the only independent predictor for stone-free status (OR 0.9; p = 0.02). Patients with stones > 20 mm were less likely to achieve stone-free status, than those harboring stones 10-20 mm (OR 0.3; p = 0.009). SFRs according to stone size categories (< 10, 10-20, and > 20 mm) were 33.3, 50.5, and 25%. Body mass index (BMI) and stone density (Houndsfield units) were no independent predictors for stone-free status after mini-PNL.

CONCLUSIONS

We report lower SFRs than expected. Stone size was the only independent predictor for stone-free status after mini-PNL. Patients with larger stones need to be informed about high risk of additional interventions. High BMI and high stone density do not represent a barrier for stone-free status after mini-PNL.

Long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with leuprorelin and quality of life in patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa)

268

Background: LHRH analogs are the gold standard for treatment of patients with hormone-sensitive advanced PCa. In this study, we investigated the quality of life (QoL) of PCa patients under long-term treatment with leuprorelin acetate in microcapsules (1, 3, and 6 month depot formulation) for up to 19.8 years. Methods: Observational and retrospective analysis of data from 536 PCa patients treated with leuproreline and 116 patients of a control group (CG, ≥ 77 years of age, > 5 years urological treatment, no cancer, no ADT). Data was collected in 30 German office based urological practices using EORTC questionnaires QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25. Results: Mean treatment duration was 8.6 years (range: 4.5 - 19.8 years). Mean age ± SD of PCa patients (79.6 ± 6.3 years) was comparable to CG (80.5 ± 3.1 years), as were body height, weight, BMI, and Karnofsky-Index (88.0 ± 12.7 vs. 88.4 ± 12.0). The general health status (QLQ-C30) was comparable for PCa patients vs. CG: 64.6 ± 20.5 vs. 66.8 ± 20.3; p = 0.3117. Marginal differences were observed regarding physical functioning (73.2 ± 23.1 vs. 78.1 ± 21.0; p = 0.0402) and role functioning (70.6 ± 30.4 vs. 74.4 ± 25.7; p = 0.1648). PCa patients rated fatigue (33.6 ± 25.1 vs. 28.8 ± 23.3; p = 0.0629), dyspnoea (24.0 ± 28.5 vs. 19.6 ± 26.9; p = 0.1307), and insomnia (28.9 ± 32.6 vs. 23.7 ± 27.2; p = 0.0751) slightly worse than CG. As assessed by QLQ-PR25, PCa patients scored lower on sexual activity (12.0 ± 20.6 vs. 23.7 ± 25.7; p < 0.0001) and sexual function (43.3 ± 25.8 vs. 55.9 ± 27.0; p = 0.0067) compared to CG. PCa patients had less urinary tract symptoms (28.2 ± 19.8 vs. 31.2 ± 19.2; p = 0.1472) but stronger symptoms of androgen deprivation (21.4 ± 17.3 vs. 10.8 ± 13.2; p < 0.0001), and they had a higher need of incontinence aids (29.6 ± 34.2 vs. 16.7 ± 20.5; p = 0.0056) – however, 136 of the 536 PCa patients had a prostatectomy. Conclusions: In this study, PCa patients treated with leuprorelin for up to 19.8 years (8.6 years on average) had an overall QoL comparable to an age-matched control group. As expected, sexual activity and sexual function were lower in PCa patients under ADT. Overall, treatment with leuprorelin is a well-tolerated long-term therapy for patients with hormone-sensitive advanced PCa. Clinical trial information: ENA E005(a) / DE-N-LEU-019(a).

A positive family history as a risk factor for prostate cancer in a population-based study with organised prostate-specific antigen screening: results of the Swiss European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC, Aarau)

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of a positive family history (FH) as a risk factor for prostate cancer incidence and grade among men undergoing organised prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in a population-based study.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study cohort comprised all attendees of the Swiss arm of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) with systematic PSA level tests every 4 years. Men reporting first-degree relative(s) diagnosed with prostate cancer were considered to have a positive FH. Biopsy was exclusively PSA triggered at a PSA level threshold of 3 ng/mL. The primary endpoint was prostate cancer diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used.

RESULTS

Of 4 932 attendees with a median (interquartile range, IQR) age of 60.9 (57.6-65.1) years, 334 (6.8%) reported a positive FH. The median (IQR) follow-up duration was 11.6 (10.3-13.3) years. Cumulative prostate cancer incidence was 60/334 (18%, positive FH) and 550/4 598 (12%, negative FH) [odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-2.2, P = 0.001). In both groups, most prostate cancer diagnosed was low grade. There were no significant differences in PSA level at diagnosis, biopsy Gleason score or Gleason score on pathological specimen among men who underwent radical prostatectomy between both groups. On multivariable analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06), baseline PSA level (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.12-1.14), and FH (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.24-2.14) were independent predictors for overall prostate cancer incidence (all P < 0.001). Only baseline PSA level (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.12-1.16, P < 0.001) was an independent predictor of Gleason score ≥7 prostate cancer on prostate biopsy. The proportion of interval prostate cancer diagnosed in-between the screening rounds was not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Irrespective of the FH status, the current PSA-based screening setting detects the majority of aggressive prostate cancers and missed only a minority of interval cancers with a 4-year screening algorithm. Our results suggest that men with a positive FH are at increased risk of low-grade but not aggressive prostate cancer.

True targeting-derived prostate biopsy: HistoScanning™ remained inadequate despite advanced technical efforts

PURPOSE

To verify the reliability of HistoScanning™-based, true targeting (TT)-derived prostate biopsy.

METHODS

We relied on 40 patients suspicious for prostate cancer who underwent standard and TT-derived prostate biopsy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and the area under the curve (AUC) were assessed for the prediction of biopsy results per octant by HistoScanning™, using different HistoScanning™ signal volume cutoffs (>0, >0.2 and >0.5 ml).

RESULTS

Overall, 319 octants were analyzed. Of those, 64 (20.1 %) harbored prostate cancer. According to different HistoScanning™ signal volume cutoffs (>0, >0.2 and >0.5 ml), the AUCs for predicting biopsy results were: 0.51, 0.51 and 0.53, respectively. Similarly, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values were: 20.7, 78.2, 17.4 and 81.6 %; 20.7, 82.0, 20.3 and 82.3 %; and 12.1, 94.6, 33.3 and 82.9 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Prediction of biopsy results based on HistoScanning™ signals and TT-derived biopsies was unreliable. Moreover, the AUC of TT-derived biopsies was low and did not improve when additional signal volume cutoffs were applied (>0.2 and >0.5 ml). We cannot recommend a variation of well-established biopsy standards or reduction in biopsy cores based on HistoScanning™ signals.

A Multi-institutional Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes in 106 Men Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy for Distant Metastatic Prostate Cancer at Presentation

BACKGROUND

Current trials are investigating radical intervention in men with metastatic prostate cancer. However, there is a lack of safety data for radical prostatectomy as therapy in this setting.

OBJECTIVE

To examine perioperative outcomes and short-term complications after radical prostatectomy for locally resectable, distant metastatic prostate cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective case series from 2007 to 2014 comprising 106 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic (M1) prostate cancer from the USA, Germany, Italy, and Sweden.

INTERVENTION

Radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Descriptive statistics were used to present margin status, continence, and readmission, reoperation, and overall complication rates at 90 d, as well as for 21 specific complications. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to estimate survival function. Intercenter variability and M1a/ M1b subgroups were examined.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Some 79.2% of patients did not suffer any complications; positive-margin (53.8%), lymphocele (8.5%), and wound infection (4.7%) rates were higher in our cohort than in a meta-analysis of open radical prostatectomy performed for standard indications. At a median follow-up of 22.8 mo, 94/106 (88.7%) men were still alive. The study is limited by its retrospective design, differing selection criteria, and short follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical prostatectomy for men with locally resectable, distant metastatic prostate cancer appears safe in expert hands for meticulously selected patients. Overall and specific complication rates related to the surgical extirpation are not more frequent than when radical prostatectomy is performed for standard indications, and the use of extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in all of this cohort compared to its selective use in localized/locally advanced prostate cancer accounts for any extra morbidity.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Men presenting with advanced prostate cancer that has spread beyond the prostate are increasingly being considered for treatments directed at the prostate itself. On the basis of results for our international series of 106 men, surgery appears reasonably safe in this setting for certain patients.

Differences among men on active surveillance for very low-risk prostate cancer detected through population-based versus opportunistic prostate-specific antigen-screening

INTRODUCTION

Very low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is being increasingly managed by active surveillance (AS). Our aim was to assess the influence of the origin of diagnosis on PCa characteristics and treatment rates among men with very low-risk PCa in our prospective AS cohort.

METHODS

Overall, 191 men with very low-risk PCa fulfilling Epstein-criteria underwent protocol-based AS. These men originated either from the prospective population-based screening program (P-AS) or were diagnosed by opportunistic screening (O-AS).

RESULTS

Overall, n = 86 (45.0%) originated from the P-AS group, whereas n = 105 (55.0%) from the O-AS group. On univariate Cox regression analysis, age (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-1.00; p = 0.05), origin of diagnosis (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.41-1.28; p = 0.001), number of positive cores (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.18-3.90; p = 0.01) and maximum core involvement (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99-1.05; p = 0.05) were predictors for treatment necessity. On multivariate analysis, age (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.89-0.99; p = 0.05), number of positive cores (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.10-3.88; p = 0.02), maximum core involvement (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06; p = 0.04) but not origin of diagnosis were independent predictors for treatment necessity. Four men developed biochemical recurrence (all from O-AS group [p = 0.05]).

CONCLUSION

The origin of PCa diagnosis in men undergoing AS had no influence on disease progression and treatment necessity.

Influence of metformin use on PSA values, free-to-total PSA, prostate cancer incidence and grade and overall survival in a prospective screening trial (ERSPC Aarau)

PURPOSE

To analyze the effect of the oral antidiabetic drug metformin on PSA level, free-to-total PSA ratio (f/t-ratio), PCa incidence and grade as well as mortality in men participating in a population-based screening trial.

METHODS

Data from 4,314 men aged 55-70 years from a population-based PSA-screening trial (ERSPC Aarau) were analyzed. Information on metformin exposure was obtained by a self-administered questionnaire. Serum PSA threshold at ≥3 ng/ml triggered prostate biopsy. Data on PCa incidence and mortality were obtained through registry linkages.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 7.6 years. Mean age at baseline was 65.5 years (±SD 4.4). In all, n = 150 (3.5 %) men used metformin [metf+]. Mean baseline PSA levels were comparable between both groups ([metf+] 1.6 ng/ml ± 2.4 vs. [metf-] 1.8ug/l ± 2.2, p = 0.4) while f/t-ratio was slightly higher in metformin users ([metf+] 30.7 % ± 10.9 vs. [metf-] 27.3 % ± 10.9, p = 0.01). Overall, n = 372 (8.6 %) PCa cases were detected. Neither cumulative PCa incidence (n = 11; 7.3 % [metf+] vs. n = 361 8.7 % [metf-]; p = 0.5) nor d`Amico risk groups were significantly different between both groups. One man in each group (metf+ 0.7 % and metf- 0.02 %) died from PCa (p < 0.0001), respectively. All-cause mortality was significantly higher among met + compared to met- (adjusted OR 2.50, 95 %CI 1.59-3.82; p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

No significant differences in PSA levels or PCa incidence and grade were observed. The slightly higher f/t-ratio did not result in lower PCa detection rate. Metformin users were at significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality. The relatively small number of men on metformin is a main limitation of the study.

Prostate cancer screening: and yet it moves!

The debate of prostate cancer (PCa) screening has been shaped over decades. There is a plethora of articles in the literature supporting as well as declining prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. Does screening decrease PCa mortality? With the long-term results of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate (ERSPC) the answer is clearly YES. It moves! However, in medicine there are no benefits without any harm and thus, screening has to be performed in targeted and smart way-or in other words-in a risk-adapted fashion when compared with the way it was done in the past. Here, we discuss the main findings of the ERSPC trials and provide insights on how the future screening strategies should be implemented.

Efficacy of abiraterone acetate in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer: Early results from the German compassionate-use program

e15195

Background: Abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone (P) has demonstrated an improved survival of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) compared to placebo plus P in a large phase III trial. In Germany, patients were able to receive AA within a compassionate-use program (CUP). Here, we report the first results of the program. Methods: Patients were eligible for the CUP if they progressed on or after at least one cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens. For CUP entry, patients were considered to have disease progression if they had radiographic evidence of disease progression in soft tissue or bone with or without PSA-progression and ongoing androgen deprivation. Patients received AA 1000mg daily plus prednisone 5mg BID until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity. Results: Between 02-05/2011, 398 patients were registered for the CUP in Germany. Data from 191/350 (47.9%) of the patients treated at 10 different sites were available for evaluation of efficacy. Median age was 70.72yrs (52.35-87.61) and patients received a median of 1 (1-4) chemotherapy lines prior to CUP entry. Median PSA at baseline was 220.5 ng/ml (0.47-4245); 168 (88%) of patients presented with bone metastasis. With regard to efficacy, 64/191 (33.5%) of the patients showed an unconfirmed PSA-response ≥50%. At a median follow-up of 5.3 months, 51/191 (26.7%) patients had died, resulting in a median PSA-progression free and overall survival of 8.3 and 10.61 months, respectively. In a subset of patients (71/191, 37.2%) data regarding objective response was available with 25/71 (35.2%) achieving an objective response. Data from 114 pts. revealed fatigue (20.3%), hot flushes (15.8%), edema (10.6%), elevated liver enzymes (8.0%) and asthenia (7.9%) being the most frequent toxicities (any grade). Conclusions: Treatment of CRPC patients with AA outside controlled clinical trials leads to considerable PSA- and objective response rates with a favourable toxicity profile, comparable to the results from COU-AA-301 registration trial. Due to the short median follow-up, conclusions regarding PSA-progression free and overall survival may not be drawn.