Choosing Wisely: The Canadian Rheumatology Association Pediatric Committee's List of Items Physicians and Patients Should Question

OBJECTIVE

To develop a list of tests or treatments frequently used in pediatric rheumatology practice that may be unnecessary based on existing evidence.

METHODS

A Choosing Wisely (CW) working group composed of 16 pediatric rheumatologists, 1 allied health professional, 1 parent, and 1 patient used the Delphi method to generate, rank, and refine a list of tests and treatments that may be unnecessary or harmful. The items with the highest content agreement and perceived impact were presented in a survey to all Canadian Rheumatology Association (CRA) physicians who practice pediatric rheumatology. Respondents were asked to rate their agreement and impact, and to rank the items. Five items with the highest composite scores and 2 additional items selected by the CW working group were put forward for literature review.

RESULTS

The initial Delphi procedure generated 80 items. After 3 rounds, the list was narrowed to 13 items. The survey was completed by 41/81 (51%) CRA pediatric members across Canada. Respondent characteristics were similar to those of the CRA pediatric membership for self-reported gender, geographical location, and career stage. The highest composite score items were antinuclear antibody testing, drug toxicity monitoring, HLA-B27 testing, rheumatoid factor/anticyclic citrullinated peptide testing, and Lyme serology testing. Two additional items (numerous or repeated intraarticular corticosteroid injections, and autoinflammatory diseases genetic testing) were also selected. Literature review was performed for these 7 highest priority items.

CONCLUSION

We have identified areas for quality improvement in the evaluation and treatment of rheumatic diseases in Canadian children.

Differences in Healthcare Transition Views, Practices, and Barriers Among North American Pediatric Rheumatology Clinicians From 2010 to 2018

OBJECTIVE

Since 2010, the rheumatology community has developed guidelines and tools to improve healthcare transition. In this study, we aimed to compare current transition practices and beliefs among Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) rheumatology providers with transition practices from a provider survey published in 2010.

METHODS

In 2018, CARRA members completed a 25-item online survey about healthcare transition. Got Transition's Current Assessment of Health Care Transition Activities was used to measure clinical transition processes on a scale of 1 (basic) to 4 (comprehensive). Bivariate analyses were used to compare 2010 and 2018 survey findings.

RESULTS

Over half of CARRA members completed the survey (202/396), including pediatric rheumatologists, adult- and pediatric-trained rheumatologists, pediatric rheumatology fellows, and advanced practice providers. The most common target age to begin transition planning was 15-17 years (49%). Most providers transferred patients prior to age 21 years (75%). Few providers used the American College of Rheumatology transition tools (31%) or have a dedicated transition clinic (23%). Only 17% had a transition policy in place, and 63% did not consistently address healthcare transition with patients. When compared to the 2010 survey, improvement was noted in 3 of 12 transition barriers: availability of adult primary care providers, availability of adult rheumatologists, and pediatric staff transition knowledge and skills (P < 0.001 for each). Nevertheless, the mean current assessment score was < 2 for each measurement.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates improvement in certain transition barriers and practices since 2010, although implementation of structured transition processes remains inconsistent.

Jointly managing arthritis: information needs of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and their parents

The objective of this article is to explore information needs of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and their parents in order to develop a web-based psychoeducational program aimed at improving their quality of life. A qualitative study design was used. A purposive sample of children (n = 41; 8-11 years) with JIA and parents (n = 48) participated in parent-child interviews (n = 29), and four child-focus and four parent-focus group interviews. Transcribed data were organized into categories that reflected emerging themes. Findings uncovered three major themes: "living with JIA", "jointly managing JIA", and "need for a web-based program of JIA information and social Support". Subthemes for "Living with JIA" were as follows: "impact on participation", "worry and distress", and "receiving social support". Subthemes under "Jointly Managing JIA" included "obtaining JIA information", "communication and advocacy", and "strategies to manage JIA". Participants endorsed a web-based program as a way to access JIA information and social support. In order to jointly manage JIA, participants expressed the need for disease-specific information, management strategies, and social support and felt that the Internet was acceptable for delivering these disease-management strategies. Findings from this study will inform development and evaluation of an online program to help children and parents jointly manage JIA.

Developing a standardized approach to the assessment of pain in children and youth presenting to pediatric rheumatology providers: a Delphi survey and consensus conference process followed by feasibility testing

BACKGROUND

Pain in children with rheumatic conditions such as arthritis is common. However, there is currently no standardized method for the assessment of this pain in children presenting to pediatric rheumatologists. A more consistent and comprehensive approach is needed to effectively assess, treat and monitor pain outcomes in the pediatric rheumatology population. The objectives of this study were to: (a) develop consensus regarding a standardized pain assessment tool for use in pediatric rheumatology practice and (b) test the feasibility of three mediums (paper, laptop, and handheld-based applications) for administration.

METHODS

In Phase 1, a 2-stage Delphi technique (pediatric rheumatologists and allied professionals) and consensus meeting (pediatric pain and rheumatology experts) were used to develop the self- and proxy-report pain measures. In Phase 2, 24 children aged 4-7 years (and their parents), and 77 youth, aged 8-18 years, with pain, were recruited during routine rheumatology clinic appointments and completed the pain measure using each medium (order randomly assigned). The participant's rheumatologist received a summary report prior to clinical assessment. Satisfaction surveys were completed by all participants. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the participant characteristics using means and standard deviations (for continuous variables) and frequencies and proportions (for categorical variables)

RESULTS

Completing the measure using the handheld device took significantly longer for youth (M = 5.90 minutes) and parents (M = 7.00 minutes) compared to paper (M = 3.08 and 2.28 minutes respectively p = 0.001) and computer (M = 3.40 and 4.00 minutes respectively; p < 0.001). There was no difference in the number of missed responses between mediums for children or parents. For youth, the number of missed responses varied across mediums (p = 0.047) with the greatest number of missed responses occurring with the handheld device. Most children preferred the computer (65%, p = 0.008) and youth reported no preference between mediums (p = 0.307). Most physicians (60%) would recommend the computer summary over the paper questionnaire to a colleague.

CONCLUSIONS

It is clinically feasible to implement a newly developed consensus-driven pain measure in pediatric rheumatology clinics using electronic or paper administration. Computer-based administration was most efficient for most users, but the medium employed in practice may depend on child age and economic and administrative factors.

An internet-based self-management program with telephone support for adolescents with arthritis: a pilot randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility of a 12-week Internet-based self-management program of disease-specific information, self-management strategies, and social support with telephone support for youth with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and their parents, aimed at reducing physical and emotional symptoms and improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

METHODS

A nonblind pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT01011179) was conducted to test the feasibility of the "Teens Taking Charge: Managing Arthritis Online" Internet intervention across 4 tertiary-level centers in Canada. Participants were 46 adolescents with JIA, ages 12 to 18 years, and 1 parent for each participant, who were randomized to the control arm (n = 24) or the Internet intervention (n = 22).

RESULTS

The 2 groups were comparable on demographic and disease-related variables and treatment expectation at baseline. Attrition rates were 18.1% and 20.8%, respectively, from experimental and control groups. Ninety-one percent of participants randomized to the experimental group completed all 12 online modules and weekly phone calls with a coach in an average of 14.7 weeks (SD 2.1). The control group completed 90% of weekly attention-control phone calls. The Internet treatment was rated as acceptable by all youth and their parents. In posttreatment the experimental group had significantly higher knowledge (p < 0.001, effect size 1.32) and lower average weekly pain intensity (p = 0.03, effect size 0.78). There were no significant group differences in HRQOL, self-efficacy, adherence, and stress posttreatment.

CONCLUSION

Findings support the feasibility (acceptability, compliance, and user satisfaction) and initial efficacy of Internet delivery of a self-management program for improving disease-specific knowledge and reducing pain in youth with JIA.

Early predictors of poor functional outcome in systemic-onset juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the ability of a previously described set of criteria to predict poor functional outcome in a large, multicenter cohort of children with systemic-onset juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA).

METHODS

All children who were diagnosed with systemic-onset JRA since 1980 at the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto), since 1983 at the Isaac Walton Killam Hospital for Children (Halifax), and since 1981 at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (Ottawa) were evaluated. Patients were included in the study if they had been evaluated clinically within 6 months of diagnosis and had been followed up for at least 2 years. Patients were divided into 4 cohorts according to their length of followup: 2-4 years, 4-7 years, 7-10 years, and >10 years. Using previously described criteria for destructive arthritis in children with systemic-onset JRA, the patients were classified as either high risk or low risk for poor functional outcome based on the data from their 6-month visit. High-risk patients had active systemic disease (persistent fever or corticosteroid requirement for control of systemic disease) and a platelet count > or =600 x 10(9)/liter. Poor outcome was defined as moderate or severe disability (defined as a score of > or =0.75 on the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire) or disease-associated death.

RESULTS

Among 122 eligible patients with systemic-onset JRA, we were able to contact 111 (91%) for outcome data. The mean followup period was 7.7 years (SD 3.7). The mean age at outcome assessment was 13.5 years (SD 5.3). There were 51 boys and 60 girls. Twenty-four patients (22%) had moderate-to-severe disability and 2 patients died; these 26 patients were considered to have had a poor outcome. We could determine risk classification for 104 patients. Twenty-four patients (23%) met the criteria for high risk at the 6-month visit. Overall, the risk of a poor functional outcome was significantly higher in the high-risk group (relative risk 3.3, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.73-6.43, P = 0.0004). This risk was most marked in the cohort with > 10 years of followup (relative risk 4.3, 95% CI 1.82-10.29, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

The presence of active systemic disease at 6 months, as characterized by fever or the need for corticosteroids, and thrombocytosis strongly predicted the development of a poor functional outcome in these patients. This was especially apparent with longterm followup. Our study validates the previously developed prognostic criteria for systemic-onset JRA.