Implications of the International Health Regulations (2005) for communicable disease surveillance systems: Tunisia's experience

BACKGROUND

In May 2005, the revised International Health Regulations, known as IHR (2005), were adopted in response to the evolving nature of communicable diseases (CD) and the rapid increase in global trade and travel. CD surveillance is an integral part of a country's core requirements under the regulations.

METHODS

The implications of these requirements were assessed as part of a review of the national CD surveillance system of Tunisia using a qualitative methodology of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT).

RESULTS

Tunisia is some way towards meeting the requirements of IHR (2005) while some specific areas that need to be addressed are highlighted for improvement: standardization of surveillance documents, strengthening the role of the laboratory in surveillance, increased human resources and training.

CONCLUSIONS

Tunisia's experience can offer some lessons to other countries in this process. While meeting the capacity obligations of IHR (2005) requires investment and commitment, this investment will enable countries to better protect themselves against public health emergencies arising within their borders and threatening from elsewhere in the world.

[Epidemiology of Haemophilus influenzae meningitis in Tunisia]

The incidence of Haemophilus influenzae b meningitis (Hib) in children < 5 years in Tunisia was studied through a surveillance system set up in June 2000 and followed for 14 months. Population-based surveillance began in 3 governorates and sentinel surveillance in 2. Children < 5 years suspected of meningitis had lumbar puncture, macroscopic exam, blood count, chemical analysis and culture carried out. In the 14 months, 80 cases of meningitis were recorded. From the population-based surveillance most cases were children < 1 year (73.6%) and boys (64%). H. influenzae was isolated in 38% of cases, pneumococci in 13% and meningococci in 7%. The incidence of confirmed Hib was 14.4/100 000 children. The estimated cost of identifying and treating Hib meningitis and its complications was greater than the cost of vaccine introduction. Based this study, the Ministry of Health has decided to introduce Hib vaccination.

Progress toward interruption of endemic measles transmission in Tunisia

Measles was the second leading cause of infant mortality in Tunisia prior to introduction of measles vaccination in 1979. The number of reported measles cases has decreased from 3007 in 1981 to 47 cases in 2000 due in part to the high coverage rates achieved after 1992. During 1998, a measles catch-up campaign vaccinated 1,846,657 children (95%) aged 6-16 years, and a follow-up campaign for children aged 9 months to 5 years in 2001 reached 547,766 (94%). During 1999-2001, 1717 cases of rash and fever illness were tested for measles; only 3 (0.2%) were positive for measles. From February to July 2002, an outbreak of measles involving 87 cases occurred in Tunisia in a health care setting and 56 (64%) patients were aged 15-30 years. The low number of laboratory-confirmed measles cases during 1999-2001 suggests endemic measles transmission may have been interrupted.

[Sentinel surveillance of diarrhea in Ksar-Hellal (Tunisia)]

BACKGROUND

In order to simplify the national data collection related to diarrhea, a sentinel surveillance system was implemented in the Ksar-Hellal district (Tunisia).

POPULATION AND METHODS

This system was based on 461 cases of diarrhea collected from health centers and hospitals between June 1994 and December 1995.

RESULTS

The collected information confirmed the previous data provided by the national system: frequency of diarrhea in health centers (4.14%), occurrence of the disease especially in the summer period, rate of hospitalization (10%) and low proportion of severe dehydration. The system also gave some new information related to the proportion of persistent diarrhea (7.1%), the low frequency of malnutrition (11%) and the etiology.

CONCLUSION

The sentinel surveillance system validates information previously provided by the National Surveillance System. It also gave new information not obtained by the classical surveillance system.