The development of oral semaglutide, an oral GLP-1 analog, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are effective agents for achieving glycemic control. Oral semaglutide is the first oral formulation of a GLP-1RA to be approved in the USA. This agent may lead to earlier initiation of GLP-1RA therapy in the type 2 diabetes continuum of care, and represents a valuable treatment option for patients with a preference for oral therapy. The efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide was assessed in the PIONEER clinical trial program, which included 9543 patients (1293 Japanese). The program included 10 trials, two of which were conducted specifically in Japan. Across the whole program, oral semaglutide was shown to be effective in helping patients achieve glycemic control and reducing body weight. The highest approved dose of oral semaglutide (14 mg) reduced glycated hemoglobin significantly more than placebo, empagliflozin, dulaglutide, and sitagliptin, and was non-inferior to liraglutide. Superior reductions in body weight were also observed with oral semaglutide 14 mg compared with placebo, sitagliptin, and liraglutide, and similar body weight reductions were seen vs. empagliflozin. In all the PIONEER trials, oral semaglutide was well tolerated; there were no unexpected safety concerns and the safety profile was consistent with other GLP-1RAs. Oral semaglutide also demonstrated a favorable cardiovascular safety profile, and significant reductions in cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality vs. placebo in the PIONEER 6 trial. Oral semaglutide, therefore, represents an effective treatment option, that may lead to earlier initiation of GLP-1RA therapy in the diabetes treatment landscape.

The police, social services and psychiatry cooperation in Denmark--a new model of working practice between governmental sectors. A description of the concept, process, practice and experience

In 2004 a new model of working practice between three public sectors, the local Police Department, Social Services and Psychiatry/Mental Health Services (PSP) was introduced in the municipality of Frederiksberg, Denmark. The aim of this cooperation was to enhance support to vulnerable citizens, who do not belong solely to one of the three sectors and thereby often get lost in the system. The PSP cooperation was introduced to ensure that relevant information concerning vulnerable citizens was shared between the three sectors and to improve collaboration between the sectors involved in order to provide the needed support to the individual citizen. Due to the success of the PSP cooperation in Frederiksberg, the PSP model was implemented by law in Denmark in 2009. In order to evaluate the model, a qualitative study based on structured interviews, focus group discussions and observations, was performed in four selected municipalities in Denmark: Frederiksberg, Odense, Amager and Esbjerg. The evaluation was undertaken by the Danish National Centre for Social Research. It is concluded that the PSP cooperation draws attention to marginalized groups of citizens and helps to prevent social downfall and crime. Participants of the PSP cooperations further highlight positive changes in the cooperation between the involved sectors, which is thought to further improve the support to vulnerable citizens and thereby enhance both prevention and follow up of cases. Furthermore, the recommendations drawn from the evaluation are to adapt PSP cooperations to local conditions, avoid unnecessary red-tape, keep a constant focus on citizens' ethics, as well as involve the frontline workers in the individual sectors, i.e. those who are actually in contact with marginalized citizens.

Fifty-two-week, randomized, multicenter trial to compare the safety and efficacy of the novel glucagon-like peptide-1 analog liraglutide vs glibenclamide in patients with type 2 diabetes

Aims/Introduction:  We compared the safety and efficacy of liraglutide vs glibenclamide in patients with poorly controlled (HbA_1c, 7.4–10.4%) type 2 diabetes.

Materials and Methods:  Subjects were randomly assigned at a 1:2 ratio to receive 1‐year treatment with glibenclamide 1.25–2.5 mg/day or liraglutide 0.9 mg/day. Other oral anti‐diabetic drugs (OAD) were prohibited during the trial. Adverse events (AE) were monitored.

Results:  A total of 400 patients (liraglutide group, n = 268; glibenclamide group, n = 132) were randomized and exposed to trial products. At week 52 vs baseline, HbA_1c in the liraglutide and glibenclamide groups was reduced from 9.3 to 7.8% and from 9.2 to 8.2%, respectively. Treatment difference (liraglutide – glibenclamide) at the end of the study was −0.49 (95% CI, −0.71 to −0.27). In the liraglutide and glibenclamide groups, Japan Diabetes Society target HbA_1c < 6.9% was achieved by 22.1 and 8.5% of patients, respectively. Fasting plasma glucose fell from 202.8 and 202.1 mg/dL, respectively, to 145.3 and 156.7 mg/dL, respectively. Mean plasma glucose and mean postprandial plasma glucose increment were lower in the liraglutide group. Mean bodyweight was reduced by −0.8 kg in the liraglutide group and increased by 1.0 kg in the glibenclamide group. The proportion of patients reporting at least one treatment‐emergent AE (TEAE) in the liraglutide and glibenclamide groups was 91.4 and 91.7%, respectively. Most TEAE were mild in severity. No major hypoglycemic episode was observed.

Conclusions:  Once‐daily administration of liraglutide 0.9 mg for 52 weeks provides more favorable metabolic control and safety profile compared with glibenclamide. Patients on liraglutide lost bodyweight, whereas those on glibenclamide gained weight. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov (no. NCT00393718). (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2011.00128.x, 2011)

The once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analog, liraglutide, improves β-cell function in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes

Aims/Introduction:  β‐cell function was evaluated by homeostasis model assessment of β‐cell function (HOMA‐B) index, proinsulin:insulin and proinsulin:C‐peptide ratios in adult, Japanese type 2 diabetes patients receiving liraglutide.

Materials and Methods:  Data from two randomized, controlled clinical trials (A and B) including 664 Japanese type 2 diabetes patients (mean values: glycated hemoglobin [HbA_1c] 8.61–9.32%; body mass index [BMI] 24.4–25.3 kg/m²) were analyzed. In two 24‐week trials, patients received liraglutide 0.9 mg (n = 268) or glibenclamide 2.5 mg (n = 132; trial A), or liraglutide 0.6, 0.9 mg (n = 176) or placebo (n = 88) added to previous sulfonylurea therapy (trial B).

Results:  Liraglutide was associated with improved glycemic control vs sulfonylurea monotherapy or placebo. In liraglutide‐treated groups in trials A and B, area under the curve (AUC) _{insulin 0–3 h} was improved (P < 0.001 for all) and the AUC_{insulin 0–3 h}:AUC_{glucose 0–3 h} ratio was increased (estimated treatment difference [liraglutide–comparator] 0.058 [0.036, 0.079]). HOMA‐B significantly increased with liraglutide relative to comparator in trial B (P < 0.05), but not in trial A. The reduction in fasting proinsulin:insulin ratio was 50% greater than in comparator groups.

Conclusions:  In Japanese type 2 diabetes patients, liraglutide was associated with effective glycemic control, restoration of prandial insulin response and indications of improved β‐cell function. This trial was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (trial A: no. NCT00393718/JapicCTI‐060328 and trial B: no. NCT00395746/JapicCTI‐060324). (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2012.00193.x, 2012)

Glucagon-like peptide-1 analog liraglutide in combination with sulfonylurea safely improves blood glucose measures vs sulfonylurea monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: Results of a 52-week, randomized, multicenter trial

Aims/Introduction:  Sulfonylurea (SU) agents are the most effective drugs at lowering blood glucose when used alone. However, their effectiveness declines after a certain period. The addition of liraglutide to existing SU therapy might reverse some of the known drawbacks of SU.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

  This multicenter, randomized, 52-week study assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of adding liraglutide at 0.6 or 0.9 mg/day to existing SU therapy in Japanese patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.

RESULTS

  In total, 264 patients were enrolled and received treatment. At week 52, HbA1c in the liraglutide 0.6 mg, liraglutide 0.9 mg and placebo groups was reduced from 9.00 to 7.91%, from 8.61 to 7.33%, and from 8.85 to 8.79%, respectively. The mean difference of HbA1c (95% CI) in the liraglutide 0.6 and 0.9 mg groups vs the placebo group was 0.96 (-1.25 to -0.67) and -1.33 (-1.62 to -1.04), respectively. For the liraglutide 0.6 mg, 0.9 mg and placebo groups, the Japanese Diabetes Society target HbA1c of <6.9% was achieved by 15.1, 39.1 and 4.5% of patients, respectively. Mean fasting plasma glucose at week 52 was lower in the liraglutide groups compared with the placebo group, and mean bodyweight remained unchanged in the liraglutide groups. Most subjects in all three treatment groups reported mild adverse events. No major hypoglycemic episode was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

  Once-daily administration of liraglutide in combination with SU for 52 weeks provided favorable metabolic control, a safety profile and did not alter bodyweight. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov (no. NCT00395746). (J Diabetes Invest,doi: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2011.00103.x, 2011).

Efficacy and safety of the once-daily human GLP-1 analogue, liraglutide, vs glibenclamide monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Liraglutide is a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials, largely conducted in populations of European descent, liraglutide has been shown to lower HbA(1C), weight and systolic blood pressure with a low risk of hypoglycaemia. This Phase 3, 24-week, multi-centre, double-blind, double dummy, randomised parallel-group trial compared the efficacy and safety of liraglutide and glibenclamide monotherapy in Japanese subjects with T2DM, inadequately controlled with diet therapy or oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) monotherapy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 411 Japanese subjects were randomised 2:1 to liraglutide (n = 272) or glibenclamide (n = 139). Liraglutide was administered at a maximum planned dose of 0.9 mg once daily. Glibenclamide was administered once or twice daily at a planned maximum dose of 2.5 mg/day, before or after meals.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00393718.

RESULTS

After 24 weeks, glycaemic control with liraglutide was non-inferior/superior to glibenclamide, with HbA(1C) at 24 weeks of 6.99% (SE +/- 0.07) with liraglutide and 7.50% (+/-0.09) with glibenclamide (difference, -0.5%; 95% CI -0.70 to 0.30; p < 0.0001). Mean fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels at 24 weeks were significantly lower with liraglutide (7.6 mmol/l [SE +/- 0.1]) vs glibenclamide (8.3 mmol/l [+/-0.1]; difference, -0.72 mmol/l; 95% CI -1.0 to -0.4; p < 0.0001). Weight was reduced by -0.92 kg from a baseline of 65.2 kg in liraglutide-treated patients, compared with weight gain of +0.99 kg from a baseline of 64.8 kg with glibenclamide (difference, -1.91 kg; 95% CI -2.34 to -1.48; p < 0.0001). A significantly lower rate of minor hypoglycaemic episodes was achieved with liraglutide compared with glibenclamide (p < 0.0001), and no major hypoglycaemic episodes were reported in either treatment group. The most common gastrointestinal AEs were diarrhoea (liraglutide, 6.3%; glibenclamide, 3.8%) and constipation (liraglutide, 5.6%; glibenclamide, 3.8%). Nausea was infrequent (liraglutide, 4.5%; glibenclamide, 1.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Liraglutide monotherapy, administered once daily for 24 weeks in Japanese subjects with T2DM, was well tolerated. Compared with glibenclamide monotherapy, liraglutide achieved superior glycaemic control and weight outcome, and a significantly lower incidence of hypoglycaemia. Future studies, comprising a greater proportion of true therapy-naïve Japanese patients, will be beneficial in order to establish the true add-on efficacy of liraglutide monotherapy in patients with T2DM.

Improved glycaemic control with minimal hypoglycaemia and no weight change with the once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue liraglutide as add-on to sulphonylurea in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes

AIM

Sulphonylureas (SUs) are often used as first-line treatments for type 2 diabetes in Japan, hence it is important to study new antidiabetic drugs in combination with SUs in Japanese patients.

METHODS

The efficacy and safety of the once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue liraglutide were compared in 264 Japanese subjects [mean body mass index (BMI) 24.9 kg/m(2); mean glycated haemoglobin (HBA1c) 8.4%] randomized and exposed to receive liraglutide 0.6 mg/day (n = 88), 0.9 mg/day (n = 88) or placebo (n = 88) each added to SU monotherapy (glibenclamide, glicazide or glimeprimide) in a 24-week, double-blind, parallel-group trial.

RESULTS

The mean change in HBA1c from baseline to week 24 (LOCF) was -1.56 (s.d. 0.84) and -1.46 (s.d. 0.95) with liraglutide 0.9 and 0.6 mg respectively, and -0.40 (s.d. 0.93) with placebo. HBA1c decreased in the placebo group from 8.45 to 8.06%, while liraglutide reduced HBA1c from 8.60 to 7.14%, and from 8.23 to 6.67% at the 0.6 and 0.9 mg doses respectively. Mean HBA1c at week 24 of the two liraglutide groups were significantly lower than the placebo group (p < 0.0001 for both). More subjects reached HBA1c < 7.0% with liraglutide (0.6 mg: 46.5%; 0.9 mg: 71.3%) vs. placebo (14.8%). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels were significantly improved with liraglutide (difference -1.47 mmol/l and -1.80 mmol/l with 0.6 and 0.9 mg vs. placebo; p < 0.0001). Overall safety was similar between treatments: no major hypoglycaemic episodes were reported, while 84/77/38 minor hypoglycaemic episodes occurred in the 0.6 mg/0.9 mg and placebo treatment groups (all in combination with SU), reflecting lower ambient glucose levels. No relevant change in mean body weight occurred in subjects receiving liraglutide (0.6 mg: 0.06 kg; 0.9 mg: -0.37 kg), while mean body weight decreased in subjects receiving placebo (-1.12 kg).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of liraglutide to SU treatment for 24 weeks dose-dependently improved glycaemic control vs. SU monotherapy, without causing major hypoglycaemia or weight gain or loss.

Dose-dependent improvement in glycemia with once-daily liraglutide without hypoglycemia or weight gain: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes

AIMS

To evaluate dose-response efficacy and safety of once-daily human GLP-1 analog liraglutide in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Patients (226, treated with diet with/without OADs, mean HbA(1c) 8.30%, mean BMI 23.9kg/m(2)) were randomized after OAD discontinuation and washout to receive liraglutide 0.1, 0.3, 0.6 or 0.9mg once daily, or placebo in double-blind, parallel-group design for 14 weeks.

RESULTS

Liraglutide dose levels reduced HbA(1c) versus placebo (by 0.79%, 1.22%, 1.64% and 1.85%, respectively; p<0.0001 for linear contrast). Liraglutide 0.9mg/day resulted in 75% of patients achieving HbA(1c) <7.0% and 57% achieving HbA(1c) <6.5%. There were no major or minor hypoglycemic events. Liraglutide also reduced, with significant dose-response (each p<0.0001 for linear contrast) versus placebo: fasting plasma glucose (up to 2.5mmol/L), postprandial (0-3h) glucose excursion (up to 12.8mmol/(Lh)); and increased postprandial insulin secretion (up to 23.0microU/(mLh)) and beta-cell function as evaluated by HOMA-beta (up to around 20.0(microU/mL)/(mg/dL)). Body weight was unchanged; no development of liraglutide antibodies was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Liraglutide was highly effective and well tolerated at doses up to 0.9mg/day in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes, allowing glycemic control without weight gain or hypoglycemia.