3
|
Kalantari F, Mirshahvalad SA, Hoellwerth M, Schweighofer-Zwink G, Huber-Schönauer U, Hitzl W, Rendl G, Koelblinger P, Pirich C, Beheshti M. Prognostic Value of Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT to Predict Brain Metastasis Development in Melanoma Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:127. [PMID: 38201554 PMCID: PMC10778001 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
To investigate the value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in predicting the occurrence of brain metastases in melanoma patients, in this retrospective study 201 consecutive patients with pathology-proven melanoma, between 2008 and 2021, were reviewed. Those who underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT for initial staging were considered eligible. Baseline assessment included histopathology, 18F-FDG-PET/CT, and brain MRI. Also, all patients had serial follow-ups for diagnosing brain metastasis development. Baseline 18F-FDG-PET/CT parameters were analysed using competing risk regression models to analyze their correlation with the occurrence of brain metastases. Overall, 159 patients entered the study. The median follow-up was six years. Among clinical variables, the initial M-stage and TNM-stage were significantly correlated with brain metastasis. Regarding 18F-FDG-PET/CT parameters, regional metastatic lymph node uptake values, as well as prominent SULmax (pSULmax) and prominent SUVmean (pSUVmean), were significantly correlated with the outcome. Cumulative incidences were 10% (6.3-16%), 31% (24.4-38.9%), and 35.2% (28.5-43.5%) after 1, 5, and 10 years. There were significant correlations between pSULmax (p-value < 0.001) and pSULpeak (p-value < 0.001) and the occurrence of brain metastases. The higher these values, the sooner the patient developed brain metastases. Thus, baseline 18F-FDG-PET/CT may have the potential to predict brain metastasis in melanoma patients. Those with high total metabolic activity should undergo follow-up/complementary evaluations, such as brain MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Forough Kalantari
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (F.K.); (S.A.M.); (G.S.-Z.); (U.H.-S.); (G.R.); (C.P.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, 1461884513 Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Ali Mirshahvalad
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (F.K.); (S.A.M.); (G.S.-Z.); (U.H.-S.); (G.R.); (C.P.)
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging (University Medical Imaging Toronto (UMIT)), University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital–Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada
| | - Magdalena Hoellwerth
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (M.H.); (P.K.)
| | - Gregor Schweighofer-Zwink
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (F.K.); (S.A.M.); (G.S.-Z.); (U.H.-S.); (G.R.); (C.P.)
| | - Ursula Huber-Schönauer
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (F.K.); (S.A.M.); (G.S.-Z.); (U.H.-S.); (G.R.); (C.P.)
| | - Wolfgang Hitzl
- Biostatistics and Publication of Clinical Trial Studies, Research and Innovation Management (RIM), Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria;
- Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
- Research Program Experimental Ophthalmology & Glaucoma Research, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Gundula Rendl
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (F.K.); (S.A.M.); (G.S.-Z.); (U.H.-S.); (G.R.); (C.P.)
| | - Peter Koelblinger
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (M.H.); (P.K.)
| | - Christian Pirich
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (F.K.); (S.A.M.); (G.S.-Z.); (U.H.-S.); (G.R.); (C.P.)
| | - Mohsen Beheshti
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (F.K.); (S.A.M.); (G.S.-Z.); (U.H.-S.); (G.R.); (C.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ayati N, Jamshidi-Araghi Z, Hoellwerth M, Schweighofer-Zwink G, Hitzl W, Koelblinger P, Pirich C, Beheshti M. Predictive value and accuracy of [ 18F]FDG PET/CT modified response criteria for checkpoint immunotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:2715-2726. [PMID: 37140669 PMCID: PMC10317870 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06247-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used in metastatic melanoma and dramatically alter the treatment of these patients. Given the high cost and potential toxicity, a reliable method for evaluating treatment response is needed. In this study, we assessed tumor response in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ICIs using three modified response criteria: PET Response Evaluation Criteria for Immunotherapy (PERCIMT), PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors for up to Five Lesions (PERCIST5), and immunotherapy-modified PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors for up to Five Lesions (imPERCIST5). METHODS Ninety-one patients with non-resectable stage IV metastatic melanoma who received ICIs were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Each patient had two [18F]FDG PET/CT scans performed before and after ICI therapy. Responses at the follow-up scan were evaluated according to PERCIMT, PERCIST5, and imPERCIST5 criteria. Patients were classified into four groups: complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response (PMR), progressive metabolic disease (PMD), and stable metabolic disease (SMD). To assess the "disease control rate," two groups have been defined based on each criterion: patients with CMR, PMR, and SMD as "disease-controlled group (i.e., responders)" and PMD as the "uncontrolled-disease group (i.e., non-responders)". The correspondence between metabolic tumor response defined by these criteria and clinical outcome was assessed and compared. RESULTS The response and the disease control rates were 40.7% and 71.4%, 41.8% and 50.5%, and 54.9% and 74.7% based on the PERCIMT, PERCIST5, and imPERCIST5 criteria, respectively. PERCIMT and imPERCIST5 showed significantly different disease control rates from that of PERCIST5 (P < 0.001), whereas it was not significant between PERCIMT and imPERCIST5. Overall survival was significantly longer in the metabolic responder groups than in the non-responder groups based on PERCIMT and PERCIST5 criteria (PERCIMT: 2.48 versus 1.47 years, P = 0.003; PERCIST5: 2.57 versus 1.81 years. P = 0.017). However, according to imPERCIST5 criterion, this difference was not observed (P = 0.12). CONCLUSION Although the appearance of new lesions can be secondary to an inflammatory response to ICIs and indicative of pseudoprogression, given the higher rate of true progression, the appearance of new lesions should be interpreted deliberately. Of the three assessed modified criteria, PERCIMT appear to provide more reliable metabolic response assessment that correlates strongly with overall patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narjess Ayati
- Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Zahra Jamshidi-Araghi
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shahid Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical & Research Center, Tehran, Iran
| | - Magdalena Hoellwerth
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Gregor Schweighofer-Zwink
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Hitzl
- Biostatistics and Publication of Clinical Trial Studies, Research and Innovation Management (RIM), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
- Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
- Research Program Experimental Ophthalmology & Glaucoma Research, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Peter Koelblinger
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Christian Pirich
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Mohsen Beheshti
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schumann K, Mauch C, Klespe KC, Loquai C, Nikfarjam U, Schlaak M, Akçetin L, Kölblinger P, Hoellwerth M, Meissner M, Mengi G, Braun AD, Mengoni M, Dummer R, Mangana J, Sindrilaru MA, Radmann D, Hafner C, Freund J, Rappersberger K, Weihsengruber F, Meiss F, Reinhardt L, Meier F, Rainer B, Richtig E, Ressler JM, Höller C, Eigentler T, Amaral T, Peitsch WK, Hillen U, Harth W, Ziller F, Schatton K, Gambichler T, Susok L, Maul LV, Läubli H, Debus D, Weishaupt C, Börger S, Sievers K, Haferkamp S, Zenderowski V, Nguyen VA, Wanner M, Gutzmer R, Terheyden P, Kähler K, Emmert S, Thiem A, Sachse M, Gercken-Riedel S, Kaune KM, Thoms KM, Heinzerling L, Heppt MV, Tratzmiller S, Hoetzenecker W, Öllinger A, Steiner A, Peinhaupt T, Podda M, Schmid S, Wollina U, Biedermann T, Posch C. Real-world outcomes using PD-1 antibodies and BRAF + MEK inhibitors for adjuvant melanoma treatment from 39 skin cancer centers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2022; 37:894-906. [PMID: 36433688 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibodies and BRAF + MEK inhibitors are widely used for adjuvant therapy of fully resected high-risk melanoma. Little is known about treatment efficacy outside of phase III trials. This real-world study reports on clinical outcomes of modern adjuvant melanoma treatment in specialized skin cancer centers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. METHODS Multicenter, retrospective study investigating stage III-IV melanoma patients receiving adjuvant nivolumab (NIV), pembrolizumab (PEM) or dabrafenib + trametinib (D + T) between 1/2017 and 10/2021. The primary endpoint was 12-month recurrence-free survival (RFS). Further analyses included descriptive and correlative statistics, and a multivariate linear-regression machine learning model to assess the risk of early melanoma recurrence. RESULTS In total, 1198 patients from 39 skin cancer centers from Germany, Austria and Switzerland were analysed. The vast majority received anti PD-1 therapies (n = 1003). Twelve-month RFS for anti PD-1 and BRAF + MEK inhibitor-treated patients were 78.1% and 86.5%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.998 [95% CI 1.335-2.991]; p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) in anti PD-1 (95.8%) and BRAF + MEK inhibitor (96.9%) treated patients (p > 0.05) during the median follow-up of 17 months. Data indicates that anti PD-1 treated patients who develop immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have lower recurrence rates compared to patients with no irAEs (HR 0.578 [95% CI 0.443-0.754], p = 0.001). BRAF mutation status did not affect overall efficacy of anti PD-1 treatment (p > 0.05). In both, anti PD-1 and BRAF + MEK inhibitor treated cohorts, data did not show any difference in 12-month RFS and 12-month OS comparing patients receiving total lymph node dissection (TLND) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy only (p > 0.05). The recurrence prediction model reached high specificity but only low sensitivity with an AUC = 0.65. No new safety signals were detected. Overall, recorded numbers and severity of adverse events were lower than reported in pivotal phase III trials. CONCLUSIONS Despite recent advances in adjuvant melanoma treatment, early recurrence remains a significant clinical challenge. This study shows that TLND does not reduce the risk of early melanoma recurrence and should only be considered in selected patients. Data further highlight that variables collected during clinical routine are unlikely to allow for a clinically relevant prediction of individual recurrence risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Schumann
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, School of Medicine, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Cornelia Mauch
- Department for Dermatology and Venereology and CIO ABCD, University Hospital Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Kai-Christian Klespe
- Department for Dermatology and Venereology and CIO ABCD, University Hospital Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Carmen Loquai
- Department for Dermatology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nikfarjam
- Department for Dermatology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Max Schlaak
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Larissa Akçetin
- Department for Dermatology and Allergy, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Kölblinger
- Department for Dermatology and Allergology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Magdalena Hoellwerth
- Department for Dermatology and Allergology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Markus Meissner
- Department for Dermatology, University Clinic Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Guelcin Mengi
- Department for Dermatology, University Clinic Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Miriam Mengoni
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Reinhard Dummer
- Dermatology Clinic, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Joanna Mangana
- Dermatology Clinic, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Dan Radmann
- Department for Dermatology and Allergy, University Clinic Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Christine Hafner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital St. Pölten, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, St. Pölten, Austria
| | - Johann Freund
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital St. Pölten, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, St. Pölten, Austria
| | | | | | - Frank Meiss
- Department for Dermatology and Venereology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lydia Reinhardt
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Barbara Rainer
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Erika Richtig
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Christoph Höller
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Eigentler
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, Interdisciplinary Skin Cancer Center, University Medical Center Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Teresa Amaral
- Department of Dermatology, Interdisciplinary Skin Cancer Center, University Medical Center Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Wiebke K Peitsch
- Departments of Dermatology and Phlebology, Vivantes Skin Cancer Center, Vivantes Clinic Friedrichshain, Neukölln and Spandau, Berlin, Germany
| | - Uwe Hillen
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Vivantes Skin Cancer Center, Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Harth
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Vivantes Skin Cancer Center, Klinikum Spandau, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Ziller
- Department for Dermatology, DRK Hospital Chemnitz-Rabenstein, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Kerstin Schatton
- Department for Dermatology, University Clinic Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Thilo Gambichler
- Department of Dermatology, Skin Cancer Center, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Laura Susok
- Department of Dermatology, Skin Cancer Center, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Lara Valeska Maul
- Department for Dermatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Heinz Läubli
- Department for Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Dirk Debus
- Department of Dermatology, Nuremberg General Hospital - Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Weishaupt
- Department for Dermatology and Venereology, University Clinic Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | | | - Sebastian Haferkamp
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Van Anh Nguyen
- Department for Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Mariana Wanner
- Department for Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Department of Dermatology, Mühlenkreiskliniken Minden und Ruhr University Bochum, Minden, Germany
| | - Patrick Terheyden
- Department for Dermatology and Venereology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Katharina Kähler
- Department for Dermatology and Venereology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Steffen Emmert
- Clinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Alexander Thiem
- Clinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Michael Sachse
- Department for Dermatology, Clinic Bremerhaven Reinkenheide, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Silke Gercken-Riedel
- Department for Dermatology, Clinic Bremerhaven Reinkenheide, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Kjell Matthias Kaune
- Dermatology, Dermatosurgery and Allergology Clinic, Bremen-Mitte Hospital, Bremen, Germany
| | - Kai-Martin Thoms
- Department for Dermatology, University Hospital Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Lucie Heinzerling
- Department for Dermatology and Allergy, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus Vincent Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sabine Tratzmiller
- Department for Dermatology, Municipal Hospital Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Wolfram Hoetzenecker
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Linz, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| | - Angela Öllinger
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Linz, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| | | | | | - Maurizio Podda
- Department for Dermatology, Clinic Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Sabine Schmid
- Department for Dermatology, Clinic Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Uwe Wollina
- Department for Dermatology and Allergology, Municipal Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tilo Biedermann
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, School of Medicine, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Posch
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, School of Medicine, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department for Dermatology, Clinic Hietzing, Vienna Healthcare Group, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Koelblinger P, Hoellwerth M, Dernoscheg MT, Koch L, Richtig E, Wanner M, Nguyen VA, Ostermann H, Bauer JW, Laimer M. Adjuvant anti-PD-1 antibody treatment in stage III/IV melanoma: real-world experience and health economic considerations. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2021; 19:1186-1198. [PMID: 34255435 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.14511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibodies have evolved as a new standard of care in the adjuvant treatment of completely resected melanoma. Real-world data on treatment efficacy and safety as well as cost-effectiveness are still limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS Treatment outcomes were retrospectively analyzed in a continuous patient cohort receiving adjuvant nivolumab (91 patients) or pembrolizumab (9 patients). Based on the obtained clinical data, a semi-Markov model was developed to evaluate cost-effectiveness. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 11.5 months, disease recurrence was observed in 39 patients (39 %). The site of first recurrence was locoregional in 17, distant in 19, and combined locoregional and distant in three patients. Twelve-month estimates for recurrence- and distant-metastasis-free survival were 64.8 % and 77.4 %, respectively. Sixteen patients experienced grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events, while 22 patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events. The base-case Markov model yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 13,330 € per quality-adjusted life year for adjuvant anti-PD-1 antibody treatment compared to a simulated observation cohort. CONCLUSIONS Real-world outcomes of adjuvant anti-PD-1 antibody therapy in completely resected melanoma appear comparable to clinical trial data. Moreover, our data suggests this treatment strategy to be cost-effective according to Austrian health economic standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Koelblinger
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Magdalena Hoellwerth
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | - Lukas Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Erika Richtig
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Marina Wanner
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Van-Anh Nguyen
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Johann W Bauer
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Martin Laimer
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|