Anthropometric evaluation of a 3D scanning mobile application

OBJECTIVE

Three-dimensional (3D) imaging systems are increasingly being used in health care settings for quantifying body size and shape. The potential exists to provide similar phenotyping capabilities outside of professional settings using smartphone applications (apps). The current study aim was to compare waist, hip, upper arm, and midthigh circumference measurements acquired by a free downloadable app (MeThreeSixty; Size Stream, Cary, North Carolina) and a conventional 20-camera 3D system (SS20; Size Stream) with those measured with a flexible tape at the same anatomic sites.

METHODS

Fifty-nine adults were scanned with the app and SS20; the same software was used to generate circumference estimates from device-acquired object files that were then compared with reference tape measurements.

RESULTS

The app and SS20 had similar coefficients of variation that were minimally larger than those by the tape (e.g., waist, 0.93%, 0.87%, and 0.06%). Correlations of the app and of SS20 with tape circumferences were all strong (p < 0.001) and similar in magnitude (R² s: 0.72-0.93 and 0.78-0.95, respectively); minimally significant (p < 0.05 to p < 0.01) bias was present between both imaging approaches and some tape measurements.

CONCLUSION

These proof-of-concept observations combined with ubiquitous smartphone availability create the possibility of phenotyping adult body size and shape, with important clinical and research implications, on a global scale.

Total body and regional surface area: Quantification with low-cost three-dimensional optical imaging systems

OBJECTIVES

Body surface area (SA) is a widely used physical measure incorporated into multiple thermophysiology and evolutionary biology models currently estimated in humans either with empirical prediction equations or costly whole-body laser imaging systems. The introduction of low-cost 3D scanners provides a new opportunity to quantify total body (TB) and regional SA, although a critical question prevails: can these devices acquire the quality of depth information and process this initial data to form a mesh that has the fidelity needed to generate accurate SA estimates?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This question was answered by comparing SA estimates calculated using images from four commercial 3D scanners in 108 adults to corresponding estimates acquired with a whole-body laser system. This was accomplished by processing initial mesh data from all devices, including the laser system, with the same universal software adapted specifically for repairing mesh gaps, identifying landmarks, and generating SA measurements.

RESULTS

TB SA measured on all four 3D scanners was highly correlated with corresponding laser system estimates (R² s, 0.98-0.99; all p < 0.001) with some small but significant mean differences (-0.19 to 0.06 m² ); root-mean square errors (RMSEs) were small (0.02-0.03 m² ); and significant bias was present for one device. Qualitatively similar results (e.g., R² s, 0.78-0.95; mean Δs, -0.05 to 0.02 m² ; RMSEs, 0.01-0.03 m² ) were present for trunk, arm, and leg SA comparisons.

DISCUSSION

The current study observations demonstrate that low-cost and practical 3D optical scanners are capable of accurately quantifying TB and regional SA, thus opening new opportunities for evaluating human phenotypes and related physiological characteristics.

Digital anthropometry for body circumference measurements: Toward the development of universal three-dimensional optical system analysis software

Background/Objective

Digital anthropometric (DA) assessments are increasingly being administered with three‐dimensional (3D) optical devices in clinical settings that manage patients with obesity and related metabolic disorders. However, anatomic measurement sites are not standardized across manufacturers, precluding use of published reference values and pooling of data across research centers.

Subjects/Methods

This study aimed to develop universal 3D analysis software by applying novel programming strategies capable of producing device‐independent DA estimates that agree with conventional anthropometric (CA) measurements made at well‐defined anatomic sites. A series of technical issues related to proprietary methods of 3D geometrical reconstruction and image analysis were addressed in developing major software components. To evaluate software accuracy, comparisons were made to CA circumference measurements made with a flexible tape at eleven standard anatomic sites in up to 35 adults scanned with three different commercial 3D optical devices.

Results

Overall, group mean CA and DA values across the three systems were in good agreement, with ∼2 cm systematic differences; CA and DA estimates were highly correlated (all p‐values <0.01); root‐mean square errors were low (0.51–3.27 cm); and CA‐DA bias tended to be small, but significant depending on anatomic site and device.

Conclusions

Availability of this software, with future refinements, has the potential to facilitate clinical applications and creation of large pooled uniform anthropometric databases.