2
|
Rodrigues E, Cassas F, Conde BE, da Cruz C, Barretto EHP, Dos Santos G, Figueira GM, Passero LFD, Dos Santos MA, Gomes MAS, Matta P, Yazbek P, Garcia RJF, Braga S, Aragaki S, Honda S, Sauini T, da Fonseca-Kruel VS, Ticktin T. Participatory ethnobotany and conservation: a methodological case study conducted with quilombola communities in Brazil's Atlantic Forest. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2020; 16:2. [PMID: 31931826 PMCID: PMC6958751 DOI: 10.1186/s13002-019-0352-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/26/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although multiple studies advocate the advantages of participatory research approaches for ethnoscience, few provide solid contributions from case studies that involve residents in all of the project phases. We present a case study of a participatory approach whose aim is to register ethnobotanical knowledge on the use of plants in two quilombola communities (maroon communities), an important biodiversity hotspot in the Atlantic Forest, Southeast Brazil. Our aim is to provide tools that will empower decision-making related to sustainable use and management among residents. METHODS In phase I, the objectives and activities were defined in meetings with residents to carry out ethnobotanical surveys between two quilombola communities-the Quilombo da Fazenda (QF) and Quilombo do Cambury (QC). In phase II, we offered community partners training courses on how to collect plants and ethnobotanical data. In coordination with the university team and using ethnobotanical methods, community partners interviewed specialists on plants and their uses. In phase III, using the participatory mapping method, residents indicated plot locations and collected plants to calculate the Conservation Priority Index for native species recorded in phase II. RESULTS In 178 days of fieldwork, two community partners from the QF and three from the QC selected 8 and 11 respondents who reported 175 and 195 plant species, respectively, corresponding to 9 ethnobotanical categories. Based on requests from the local community, booklets and videos with these data were collaboratively produced. A large percentage of species were found to be of great conservation priority-82.1% in the QC and 62.5% in the QF. Virola bicuhyba, Cedrela fissilis, Plinia edulis, and Tabebuia cassinoides are the species most at risk and will be the focus of phase IV, when a participatory management plan will be carried out. Additionally, we present both challenges and opportunities with the hope that others can learn from our successes and failures. CONCLUSIONS Our experience shows that it is possible to train community members who wish to document their knowledge to support the process of ensuring that local knowledge is highly regarded, further ensuring its perpetuation. In this context, the project may be of great interest to development programs in promoting community-based management strategies for useful plants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliana Rodrigues
- Center for Ethnobotanical and Ethnopharmacological Studies (CEE) - Department of Environmental Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Professor Artur Riedel, 275, Jardim Eldorado, Diadema, SP, 09972-270, Brazil.
| | - Fernando Cassas
- Center for Ethnobotanical and Ethnopharmacological Studies (CEE) - Department of Environmental Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Professor Artur Riedel, 275, Jardim Eldorado, Diadema, SP, 09972-270, Brazil
| | - Bruno Esteves Conde
- Center for Ethnobotanical and Ethnopharmacological Studies (CEE) - Department of Environmental Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Professor Artur Riedel, 275, Jardim Eldorado, Diadema, SP, 09972-270, Brazil
| | - Crenilda da Cruz
- Associação dos Remanescentes de Quilombo do Cambury, Ubatuba, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Ginacil Dos Santos
- Associação da Comunidade dos Remanescentes de Quilombo da Fazenda, Ubatuba, SP, Brazil
| | - Glyn Mara Figueira
- Centro Pluridisciplinar de Pesquisas Químicas, Biológicas e Agrícolas [CPQBA] - UNICAMP, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Priscila Matta
- Amerindian Studies Center, Universidade de São Paulo (CEstA-USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Priscila Yazbek
- Center for Ethnobotanical and Ethnopharmacological Studies (CEE) - Department of Environmental Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Professor Artur Riedel, 275, Jardim Eldorado, Diadema, SP, 09972-270, Brazil
| | | | - Silvestre Braga
- Associação da Comunidade dos Remanescentes de Quilombo da Fazenda, Ubatuba, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Sumiko Honda
- Herbário Municipal (PMSP) - Secretaria Municipal do Verde e do Meio Ambiente, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Thamara Sauini
- Center for Ethnobotanical and Ethnopharmacological Studies (CEE) - Department of Environmental Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Professor Artur Riedel, 275, Jardim Eldorado, Diadema, SP, 09972-270, Brazil
| | | | - Tamara Ticktin
- Department of Botany, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| |
Collapse
|