Hemodynamic imaging parameters in brain metastases patients - Agreement between multi-delay ASL and hypercapnic BOLD

Arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI is a routine clinical imaging technique that provides quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) information. A related technique is blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) MRI during hypercapnia, which can assess cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR). ASL is weighted towards arteries, whereas BOLD is weighted towards veins. Their associated parameters in heterogeneous tissue types or under different hemodynamic conditions remains unclear. Baseline multi-delay ASL MRI and BOLD MRI during hypercapnia were performed in fourteen patients with brain metastases. In the ROI analysis, the CBF and CVR values were positively correlated in regions showing sufficient reserve capacity (i.e. non-steal regions, rrm = 0.792). Additionally, longer hemodynamic lag times were related to lower baseline CBF (rrm = -0.822) and longer arterial arrival time (AAT; rrm = 0.712). In contrast, in regions exhibiting vascular steal an inverse relationship was found with higher baseline CBF related to more negative CVR (rrm = -0.273). These associations were confirmed in voxelwise analyses. The relationship between CBF, AAT and CVR measures seems to be dependent on the vascular status of the underlying tissue. Healthy tissue relationships do not hold in tissues experiencing impaired or exhausted autoregulation. CVR metrics can possibly identify at-risk areas before perfusion deficiencies become visible on ASL MRI, specifically within vascular steal regions.

Functional Imaging in Radiotherapy in the Netherlands: Availability and Impact on Clinical Practice

AIMS

Functional imaging with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and multiparametric magnetic resonance (mpMR) is increasingly applied for radiotherapy purposes. However, evidence and experience are still limited, and this may lead to clinically relevant differences in accessibility, interpretation and decision making. We investigated the current patterns of care in functional imaging for radiotherapy in the Netherlands in a care evaluation study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The availability of functional imaging in radiotherapy centres in the Netherlands was evaluated; features available in >80% of academic and >80% of non-academic centres were considered standard of care. The impact of functional imaging on clinical decision making was evaluated using case questionnaires on lung, head/neck, breast and prostate cancer, with multiple-choice questions on primary tumour delineation, nodal involvement, distant metastasis and incidental findings. Radiation oncologists were allowed to discuss cases in a multidisciplinary approach. Ordinal answers were evaluated by median and interquartile range (IQR) to identify the extent and variability of clinical impact; additional patterns were evaluated descriptively.

RESULTS

Information was collected from 18 radiotherapy centres in the Netherlands (all except two). PET/CT was available for radiotherapy purposes to 94% of centres; 67% in the treatment position and 61% with integrated planning CT. mpMR was available to all centres; 61% in the treatment position. Technologists collaborated between departments to acquire PET/CT or mpMR for radiotherapy in 89%. All sites could carry out image registration for target definition. Functional imaging generally showed a high clinical impact (average median 4.3, scale 1-6) and good observer agreement (average IQR 1.1, scale 0-6). However, several issues resulted in ignoring functional imaging (e.g. positional discrepancies, central necrosis) or poor observer agreement (atelectasis, diagnostic discrepancies, conformation strategies).

CONCLUSIONS

Access to functional imaging with PET/CT and mpMR for radiotherapy purposes, with collaborating technologists and multimodal delineation, can be considered standard of care in the Netherlands. For several specific clinical situations, the interpretation of images may benefit from further standardisation.

MRI and CT imaging for preoperative target volume delineation in breast-conserving therapy

BACKGROUND

Accurate tumor bed delineation after breast-conserving surgery is important. However, consistency among observers on standard postoperative radiotherapy planning CT is low and volumes can be large due to seroma formation. A preoperative delineation of the tumor might be more consistent. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the consistency of preoperative target volume delineation on CT and MRI for breast-conserving radiotherapy.

METHODS

Tumors were delineated on preoperative contrast-enhanced (CE) CT and newly developed 3D CE-MR images, by four breast radiation oncologists. Clinical target volumes (CTVs) were created by addition of a 1.5 cm margin around the tumor, excluding skin and chest wall. Consistency in target volume delineation was expressed by the interobserver variability. Therefore, the conformity index (CI), center of mass distance (dCOM) and volumes were calculated. Tumor characteristics on CT and MRI were scored by an experienced breast radiologist.

RESULTS

Preoperative tumor delineation resulted in a high interobserver agreement with a high median CI for the CTV, for both CT (0.80) and MRI (0.84). The tumor was missed on CT in 2/14 patients (14%). Leaving these 2 patients out of the analysis, CI was higher on MRI compared to CT for the GTV (p<0.001) while not for the CTV (CT (0.82) versus MRI (0.84), p=0.123). The dCOM did not differ between CT and MRI. The median CTV was 48 cm3 (range 28-137 cm3) on CT and 59 cm3 (range 30-153 cm3) on MRI (p<0.001). Tumor shapes and margins were rated as more irregular and spiculated on CE-MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that preoperative target volume delineation resulted in small target volumes with a high consistency among observers. MRI appeared to be necessary for tumor detection and the visualization of irregularities and spiculations. Regarding the tumor delineation itself, no clinically relevant differences in interobserver variability were observed. These results will be used to study the potential for future MRI-guided and neoadjuvant radiotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

International Clinical Trials Registry Platform NTR3198.