Efficacy and safety of an early oral switch in low-risk Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SABATO): an international, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection is treated with at least 14 days of intravenous antimicrobials. We assessed the efficacy and safety of an early switch to oral therapy in patients at low risk for complications related to S aureus bloodstream infection.

METHODS

In this international, open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial done in 31 tertiary care hospitals in Germany, France, the Netherlands, and Spain, adult patients with low-risk S aureus bloodstream infection were randomly assigned after 5-7 days of intravenous antimicrobial therapy to oral antimicrobial therapy or to continue intravenous standard therapy. Randomisation was done via a central web-based system, using permuted blocks of varying length, and stratified by study centre. The main exclusion criteria were signs and symptoms of complicated S aureus bloodstream infection, non-removable foreign devices, and severe comorbidity. The composite primary endpoint was the occurrence of any complication related to S aureus bloodstream infection (relapsing S aureus bloodstream infection, deep-seated infection, and mortality attributable to infection) within 90 days, assessed in the intention-to-treat population by clinical assessors who were masked to treatment assignment. Adverse events were assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study medication (safety population). Due to slow recruitment, the scientific advisory committee decided on Jan 15, 2018, to stop the trial after 215 participants were randomly assigned (planned sample size was 430 participants) and to convert the planned interim analysis into the final analysis. The decision was taken without knowledge of outcome data, at a time when 126 participants were enrolled. The new sample size accommodated a non-inferiority margin of 10%; to claim non-inferiority, the upper bound of the 95% CI for the treatment difference (stratified by centre) had to be below 10 percentage points. The trial is closed to recruitment and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01792804), the German Clinical trials register (DRKS00004741), and EudraCT (2013-000577-77).

FINDINGS

Of 5063 patients with S aureus bloodstream infection assessed for eligibility, 213 were randomly assigned to switch to oral therapy (n=108) or to continue intravenous therapy (n=105). Mean age was 63·5 (SD 17·2) years and 148 (69%) participants were male and 65 (31%) were female. In the oral switch group, 14 (13%) participants met the primary endpoint versus 13 (12%) in the intravenous group, with a treatment difference of 0·7 percentage points (95% CI -7·8 to 9·1; p=0·013). In the oral switch group, 36 (34%) of 107 participants in the safety population had at least one serious adverse event compared with 27 (26%) of 103 participants in the intravenous group (p=0·29).

INTERPRETATION

Oral switch antimicrobial therapy was non-inferior to intravenous standard therapy in participants with low-risk S aureus bloodstream infection. However, it is necessary to carefully assess patients for signs and symptoms of complicated S aureus bloodstream infection at the time of presentation and thereafter before considering early oral switch therapy.

FUNDING

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

TRANSLATIONS

For the German, Spanish, French and Dutch translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

A randomised controlled trial to study the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses during indoor clubbing events (ANRS0066s ITOC study)

BACKGROUND

In the context of the circulation of the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant, vaccination re-authorised mass indoor gatherings. The "Indoor Transmission of COVID-19" (ITOC) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05311865) aimed to assess the risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses during an indoor clubbing event among participants fully-vaccinated against COVID-19.

METHODS

ITOC, a randomised, controlled trial in the Paris region (France), enrolled healthy volunteers aged 18-49 years, fully-vaccinated against COVID-19, with no co-morbidities or symptoms, randomised 1:1 to be interventional group "attendees" or control "non-attendees". The intervention, a 7-hour indoor event in a nightclub at full capacity, with no masking, prior SARS-CoV-2 test result or social distancing required. The primary-outcome measure was the numbers of RT-PCR-determined SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects on self-collected saliva 7 days post-gathering in the per-protocol population. Secondary endpoints focused on 20 other respiratory viruses.

RESULTS

Healthy participants (n = 1,216) randomised 2:1 by blocks up to 10, 815 attendees and 401 non-attendees, yielding 529 and 287 subjects, respectively, with day-7 saliva samples. One day-7 sample from each group was positive. Looking at all respiratory viruses together, the clubbing event was associated with an increased risk of infection of 1.59 [95% CI 1.04-2.61].

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of low Delta-VOC circulation, no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 transmission among asymptomatic and vaccinated participants was found, but the risk of other respiratory virus transmission was higher.

Ensuring quality control in a COVID-19 clinical trial during the pandemic: The experience of the Inserm C20-15 DisCoVeRy study

SETTING

Health measures taken during the pandemic deeply modified the clinical research practices. At the same time, the demand for the results of the COVID-19 trials was urgent. Thus, the objective of this article is to share Inserm's experience in ensuring quality control in clinical trials in this challenging context.

OBJECTIVES

DisCoVeRy is a phase III randomized study that aimed at evaluating the safety and efficacy of 4 therapeutic strategies in hospitalized COVID-19 adult patients. Between March, 22nd 2020 and January, 20th 2021, 1309 patients were included. In order to guarantee the best quality of data, the Sponsor had to adapt to the current sanitary measures and to their impact on clinical research activity, notably by adapting Monitoring Plan objectives, involving the research departments of the participating hospitals and a network of clinical research assistants (CRAs).

RESULTS

Overall, 97 CRAs were involved and performed 909 monitoring visits. The monitoring of 100% of critical data for all patients included in the analysis was achieved, and despite of the pandemic context, a conform consent was recovered for more than 99% of patients. Results of the study were published in May and September 2021.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

The main monitoring objective was met thanks to the mobilization of considerable personnel resources, within a very tight time frame and external hurdles. There is a need for further reflection to adapt the lessons learned from this experience to the context of routine practice and to improve the response of French academic research during a future epidemic.

Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 during indoor clubbing events: A clustered randomized, controlled, multicentre trial protocol

Introduction

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic led to the implementation of several non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), from closings of bars and restaurants to curfews and lockdowns. Vaccination campaigns started hoping it could efficiently alleviate NPI. The primary objective of the "Indoor Transmission of COVID-19" (ITOC) study is to determine among a fully vaccinated population the relative risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission during one indoor clubbing event. Secondary objectives are to assess the transmission of other respiratory viruses, risk exposure, and attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination, health pass, and psychological impact of indoor club closing.

Methods and analysis

Four thousand four hundred healthy volunteers aged 18-49 years and fully vaccinated will be included in Paris region. The intervention is an 8-hour indoor clubbing event with no masks, no social distance, maximum room capacity, and ventilation. A reservation group of up to 10 people will recruit participants, who will be randomized 1:1 to either the experimental group (2,200 volunteers in two venues with capacities of 1,000 people each) or the control group (2,200 volunteers asked not to go to the club). All participants will provide a salivary sample on the day of the experiment and 7 days later. They also will answer several questionnaires. Virological analyses include polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of salivary samples and air of the venue, investigating SARS-CoV-2 and 18 respiratory viruses.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical clearance was first obtained in France from the institutional review board (Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France VII - CPP), and the trial received clearance from the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products (Agence National de Sécurité du Médicament - ANSM). The trial is supported and approved by The Agence Nationale Recherche sur le SIDA, les hépatites et maladies émergences (ANRS-MIE). Positive, negative, and inconclusive results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

Trial registration number

IDR-CB 2021-A01473-38. Clinicaltrial.gov, identifier: NCT05311865.

Transmission du SARS-CoV-2 lors d'une soirée en club fermée entre personnes vaccinées (ITOC-ANRS 0066S) : résultats préliminaires

Introduction

La pandémie de SARS-CoV-2 a conduit à la fermeture des lieux de clubbing pour réduire la transmission du virus. Les vaccins protègent en partie de l'infection et réduise ainsi sa transmission. L'étude "Indoor Transmission of COVID-19" (ITOC) a pour objectif de déterminer, parmi une population entièrement vaccinée, le risque de transmission du SARS-CoV-2 et d'autres pathogènes respiratoires lors d'un événement de clubbing en salle fermée dans une population vaccinée. Nous présentons ici les premiers résultats sur la transmission du SARS-CoV-2.

Matériels et méthodes

ITOC est une étude mono-centrique en cluster, randomisée en 2 :1 et contrôlée. L'intervention était un événement clubbing indoor de 8 heures sans port de masque, sans distanciation sociale, à jauge pleine, en octobre 2021 à Paris. Les participants étaient âgés de 18 à 49 ans avec un schéma vaccinal complet (sans le boost). Ils devaient fournir un échantillon salivaire le jour de l'expérimentation et sept jours plus tard, pour la recherche par PCR du SARS-CoV-2 et de 24 autres pathogènes respiratoires (dont VRS et autres Coronavirus). Ils ont également rempli des questionnaires en ligne à l'inclusion, un jour après l'événement et de 3 à 7 jours après pour y renseigner leurs symptômes et comportements au cours de la soirée.

Résultats

Parmi les 1216 participants randomisés, 755 ont suivis tout le protocole, 484 dans le groupe intervention et 271 dans le groupe contrôle. Les deux groupes étaient comparables sur le plan des caractéristiques socio démographiques, 53% des participants étaient des hommes, l'âge médian était de 29 ans, 22,7% était étudiant, 43,7% sortaient une à 2 fois par mois en discothèque. A J0, un participant dans chaque groupe a été testé positif au SARS-CoV-2 (Ct= 28 et 30 pour le groupe intervention et contrôle respectivement ), et à J7, un seul participant dans le groupe contrôle a été testé positif. Les analyses concernant les questionnaires et les virus respiratoires sont en en cours d'analyse.

Conclusion

La participation à une soirée en discothèque en milieu clos à pleine jauge avec une ventilation efficace (sans masque et sans distanciation physique) entre personnes vaccinés n'a pas été associée à l'apparition d'un cluster de SARS-CoV-2 à partir d'une personne contagieuse participante à la soirée. Le taux d'incidence et le nombre insuffisant de participants ne permet pas de calculer à un risque relatif de transmission du SARS-CoV-2.

Aucun lien d'intérêt

The role of perinatal palliative care following prenatal diagnosis of major, incurable fetal anomalies: a multicentre prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To describe prenatal decision-making processes and birth plans in pregnancies amenable to planning perinatal palliative care.

DESIGN

Multicentre prospective observational study.

SETTING

Nine Multidisciplinary Centres for Prenatal Diagnosis of the Paris-Ile-de-France region.

POPULATION

All cases of major and incurable fetal anomaly eligible for TOP where limitation of life-sustaining treatments for the neonate was discussed in the prenatal period between 2015 and 2016.

METHODS

Cases of congenital defects amenable to perinatal palliative care were prospectively included in each centre. Prenatal diagnosis, decision-making process, type of birth plan, birth characteristics, pregnancy and neonatal outcome were collected prospectively and anonymously.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Final decision reached following discussions in the antenatal period.

RESULTS

We identified 736 continuing pregnancies with a diagnosis of a severe fetal condition eligible for TOP. Perinatal palliative care was considered in 102/736 (13.9%) pregnancies (106 infants); discussions were multidisciplinary in 99/106 (93.4%) cases. Prenatal birth plans involved life-sustaining treatment limitation and comfort care in 73/736 (9.9%) of the pregnancies. The main reason for planning palliative care at birth was short-term inevitable death in 39 cases (53.4%). In all, 76/106 (71.7%) infants were born alive, and 18/106 (17%) infants were alive at last follow-up, including four with a perinatal palliative care birth plan.

CONCLUSIONS

Only a small proportion of severe and incurable fetal disorders were potentially amenable to limitation of life-sustaining interventions. Perinatal palliative care may not be considered a universal alternative to termination of pregnancy.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Perinatal palliative care is planned in 10% of continuing pregnancies with a major and incurable fetal condition eligible for TOP.

Séroprévalence SARS-Cov-2 chez les professionnels de santé : étude multicentrique avec analyse des facteurs de risque professionnels et extraprofessionnels

Introduction

L’objectif de notre étude était d’évaluer la séroprévalence SARS-Cov-2 chez les professionnels de santé, après la première vague Covid-19, et d’analyser les facteurs professionnels et extraprofessionnels modifiant cette prévalence.

Matériels et méthodes

Suite aux instructions gouvernementales proposant de réaliser une sérologie Covid-19 à tout professionnel de santé après la première vague, nous avons réalisé une étude transversale, multicentrique. Tous les professionnels volontaires des quatre centres participants étaient invités à réaliser une sérologie et à remplir un questionnaire concernant leurs données démographiques, leurs caractéristiques professionnelles, l’utilisation des équipements de protection individuelle et l’exposition extra professionnelle au Covid-19. Nous avons calculé la prévalence SARS-Cov-2 et utilisé une régression logistique en appliquant un effet centre.

Résultats

Un total de 3454 professionnels ont participé à l’étude dont 83,4 % de femmes. L’âge moyen était de 40,6 ans [31,8–50,3]. En médiane, la prévalence sérologique SARS-Cov-2 était de 5 % (95 % IC, 4,3 %–5,8 %). Les facteurs associés à une plus forte séroprévalence étaient : l’âge < 30 ans (aOR = 1,59, (95 % IC, 1,06–2,37)), le statut d’étudiant (aOR = 3,38, (95 % IC, 1,62–7,05)) avec une séroprévalence de 16,9 % dans cette catégorie. L’unité de travail, y compris le fait d’avoir travaillé en unité Covid ou en réanimation, ainsi que l’exposition à des patients (quel que soit leur statut infectieux) n’étaient pas associé à une augmentation de la séroprévalence. Par contre les professionnels rapportant un contact avec un patient Covid, sans protection adaptée, ou ayant pratiqué des taches aérosolisantes, y compris avec un masque FFP2, avaient un surrisque d’infection Covid-19 (respectivement aOR à 1,66 et 1,7). Enfin, l’exposition à un collègue infecté ou à un cas familial était également associée à une augmentation de la prévalence sérologique.

Conclusion

Les mesures mises en place pour limiter la transmission du SARS-Cov-2 des patients aux professionnels de santé semblent efficaces. En complément de la vaccination, l’éviction systématique des professionnels infectés, la formation des étudiants et le rappel des mesures d’hygiène durant les temps de pause pourraient limiter la contamination des professionnels de santé.

Effect of Professional and Extra-Professional Exposure on Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection among Healthcare Workers of the French Alps: A Multicentric Cross-Sectional Study

We aimed to report SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence after the first wave of the pandemic among healthcare workers, and to explore factors associated with an increased infection rate. We conducted a multicentric cross-sectional survey from 27 June to 31 September 2020. For this survey, we enrolled 3454 voluntary healthcare workers across four participating hospitals, of which 83.4% were female, with a median age of 40.6 years old (31.8-50.3). We serologically screened the employees for SARS-CoV-2, estimated the prevalence of infection, and conducted binomial logistic regression with random effect on participating hospitals to investigate associations. We estimated the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection at 5.0% (95 CI, 4.3%-5.8%). We found the lowest prevalence in health professional management support (4.3%) staff. Infections were more frequent in young professionals below 30 years old (aOR = 1.59, (95 CI, 1.06-2.37)), including paramedical students and residents (aOR = 3.38, (95 CI, 1.62-7.05)). In this group, SARS-CoV-2 prevalence was up 16.9%. The location of work and patient-facing role were not associated with increased infections. Employees reporting contacts with COVID-19 patients without adequate protective equipment had a higher rate of infection (aOR = 1.66, (95 CI, 1.12-2.44)). Aerosol-generating tasks were associated with a ~1.7-fold rate of infection, regardless of the uptake of FFP2. Those exposed to clusters of infected colleagues (aOR = 1.77, (95 CI, 1.24-2.53)) or intra-familial COVID-19 relatives (aOR = 2.09, (95 CI, 1.15-3.80)) also had a higher likelihood of infection. This report highlights that a sustained availability of personal protective equipment limits the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate to what is measured in the general population. It also pinpoints the need for dedicated hygiene training among young professionals, justifies the systematic eviction of infected personnel, and stresses the need for interventions to increase vaccination coverage among any healthcare workers.

An open-label randomized controlled trial of the effect of lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir plus IFN-β-1a and hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19

Objectives

We evaluated the clinical, virological and safety outcomes of lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir–interferon (IFN)-β-1a, hydroxychloroquine or remdesivir in comparison to standard of care (control) in coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) inpatients requiring oxygen and/or ventilatory support.

Methods

We conducted a phase III multicentre, open-label, randomized 1:1:1:1:1, adaptive, controlled trial (DisCoVeRy), an add-on to the Solidarity trial (NCT04315948, EudraCT2020-000936-23). The primary outcome was the clinical status at day 15, measured by the WHO seven-point ordinal scale. Secondary outcomes included quantification of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in respiratory specimens and pharmacokinetic and safety analyses. We report the results for the lopinavir/ritonavir-containing arms and for the hydroxychloroquine arm, trials of which were stopped prematurely.

Results

The intention-to-treat population included 583 participants—lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 145), lopinavir/ritonavir–IFN–β-1a (n = 145), hydroxychloroquine (n = 145), control (n = 148)—among whom 418 (71.7%) were male, the median age was 63 years (IQR 54–71), and 211 (36.2%) had a severe disease. The day-15 clinical status was not improved with the investigational treatments: lopinavir/ritonavir versus control, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.83, (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55–1.26, p 0.39), lopinavir/ritonavir–IFN–β-1a versus control, aOR 0.69 (95%CI 0.45–1.04, p 0.08), and hydroxychloroquine versus control, aOR 0.93 (95%CI 0.62–1.41, p 0.75). No significant effect of investigational treatment was observed on SARS-CoV-2 clearance. Trough plasma concentrations of lopinavir and ritonavir were higher than those expected, while those of hydroxychloroquine were those expected with the dosing regimen. The occurrence of serious adverse events was significantly higher in participants allocated to the lopinavir/ritonavir-containing arms.

Conclusion

In adults hospitalized for COVID-19, lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir–IFN–β-1a and hydroxychloroquine improved neither the clinical status at day 15 nor SARS-CoV-2 clearance in respiratory tract specimens.

COVID-19 et pandémie de projets de recherche clinique

Introduction

Depuis le début de l’épidémie de COVID-19, la communauté scientifique internationale s’est mobilisée pour améliorer la prise en charge des patients et leurs permettre, dans des délais jusqu’alors inégalés, de participer à des essais thérapeutiques. En l’absence de régulation nationale et internationale, la multiplication des études sur la thématique COVID-19 remet en question leur faisabilité et leur capacité à produire des résultats pertinents.

Matériels et méthodes

Les études cliniques portant sur la COVID-19 ont été extraites des bases de données mondiales entre le 15/03 et le 28/04. Les objectifs, design et population ont été extraites et analysées. Pour les essais thérapeutiques internationaux, nous avons comparé les objectifs d’inclusion au nombre de patients diagnostiqués COVID-19 dans les pays recruteurs entre S10 et S17. Pour les essais français, nous avons sélectionné les études thérapeutiques ciblant les patients hospitalisés et comparé le nombre de patients nécessaires à l’atteinte des objectifs de recrutement au nombre de patients hospitalisés en France entre S10 et S18.

Résultats

À l’échelle mondiale, 466 essais cliniques interventionnels ont été recensés dont 398 thérapeutiques, 56 prophylactiques et 5 mixtes. Les essais thérapeutiques étaient pour l’essentiel académiques (76,8 %), concernaient des patients hospitalisés présentant des formes modérées à sévères. Il s’agissait majoritairement d’essais de phase III (35,3 %), randomisés (84 %) en ouvert (48,6 %). L’objectif cumulé des inclusions était de 248 928 patients, soit 11,3 % de la population mondiale COVID-19. En France, 38 essais interventionnels étaient autorisés (79 % à promotion académiques) : 31 études thérapeutiques (81,6 %) chez des patients atteints de SARS-COV-2, 3 études sur des techniques de ventilation, 2 essais de prophylaxie et 3 des études mixtes. Sur les études thérapeutiques, 91 % avaient pour cible des patients hospitalisés, présentant une forme modérée à sévère de COVID-19. Au total, 47 molécules ont été évaluées dans des essais majoritairement de phase III (58 %), randomisés, contrôlés en ouvert dans 53 % des cas et en aveugle dans 26 % des études. À la S15, sous réserve de l’inclusion de 50 % des patients hospitalisés, les objectifs de recrutement n’étaient plus atteignables en France. Avec un taux d’acception à 100 %, la faisabilité des études était remise en question à la S17. À la S18, 23 études étaient encore en attente d’autorisation.

Conclusion

Le contexte d’urgence a pu motiver une tolérance vis-à-vis d’études cliniques sans expertise méthodologique et disperser l’effort de recherche. Ce jour, alors que la pandémie a touché en 6 mois près de 5 millions de personnes, aucun traitement n’a démontré de l’efficacité au cours d’un essai bien conduit. En France et certains pays, ces difficultés sont exacerbées par la diminution de la courbe épidémique en France. Que l’on s’oriente vers l’éventualité d’une seconde vague ou l’extinction de l’épidémie, il apparaît indispensable de limiter la dispersion de nos efforts et unir nos forces et de mettre en place d’une task force pour coordonner les essais cliniques à l’échelle nationale voire supranationale.

Daily or on-demand oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: experience from a hospital-based clinic in France

BACKGROUND

On-demand oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) has been approved for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in MSM in France following the results of clinical studies, but data are limited on real-world experience.

DESIGN

A single-center, open-label, prospective cohort study that recruited people at high risk of HIV infection in Paris.

METHODS

Participants were enrolled in a single hospital-based outpatient clinic and were proposed to start PrEP with daily or on demand TDF/FTC. At baseline and every 3 months thereafter, patients were tested for HIV and creatinine plasma levels, and data on sexual behavior, other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and tolerability were collected.

RESULTS

From 10 November 2015 to 30 April 2017, 1069 patients were screened and 1049 (98.1%) started PrEP. Median age was 36 years, 99.4% were MSM with a median number of partners of 10, and 793 (75.6%) opted for on demand PrEP. Over 486 person-years of follow-up, four HIV-infections were diagnosed in poorly or nonadherent patients (incidence 0.82/100 person-years). Rate of condomless sex at last intercourse increased from 53.3% at baseline to 79% at month 12 (P < 10), but increase in bacterial STI rates was modest (14.6% at baseline vs. 19.2% at month 12; P < 10). Most adverse events were gastrointestinal and did not lead to PrEP discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Most PrEP users were high-risk MSM and opted for on-demand PrEP. PrEP use was associated with a low HIV incidence and a high rate of condomless sex with a modest increase in bacterial STIs.

Chikungunya disease: infection-associated markers from the acute to the chronic phase of arbovirus-induced arthralgia

At the end of 2005, an outbreak of fever associated with joint pain occurred in La Réunion. The causal agent, chikungunya virus (CHIKV), has been known for 50 years and could thus be readily identified. This arbovirus is present worldwide, particularly in India, but also in Europe, with new variants returning to Africa. In humans, it causes a disease characterized by a typical acute infection, sometimes followed by persistent arthralgia and myalgia lasting months or years. Investigations in the La Réunion cohort and studies in a macaque model of chikungunya implicated monocytes-macrophages in viral persistence. In this Review, we consider the relationship between CHIKV and the immune response and discuss predictive factors for chronic arthralgia and myalgia by providing an overview of current knowledge on chikungunya pathogenesis. Comparisons of data from animal models of the acute and chronic phases of infection, and data from clinical series, provide information about the mechanisms of CHIKV infection-associated inflammation, viral persistence in monocytes-macrophages, and their link to chronic signs.

[Chikungunya physiopathology: Infection data from acute to chronic phase]

During the 2005-2006 austral summer, an outbreak of fever associated with joint pain hit the Reunion Island inhabitants. Chikungunya virus (CHIKV), the agent involved in this epidemic, was known since 50 years and was thus brought to general attention together with the risk of emergence or re-emergence of arboviral infections. This arbovirus rapidly spread worldwide, specifically in India with millions of cases, but also in Europe through imported cases (>2,000) and fewautochthonous cases in Italy and in France. Human pathology is characterized by arthralgia and myalgia, which persist for months or years. Development of macaque model of CHIKV disease evidenced the key role of monocytesmacrophages in viral persistence.We are reporting herein the present knowledge about physiopathology of the virus and the CHIKV disease. Comparison of animal model data in chronic phase of infection and data acquired in follow-up of patients allows us to propose explanation of mechanisms of inflammation associated with viral infection. This review is aimed at opening discussion about the relationship between the CHIKV, the immune response and the development of virus-induced chronic arthralgia and myalgia.