A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study to assess safety, tolerability, and efficacy of RT001 in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

RT001 is a deuterated synthetic homologue of linoleic acid, which makes membrane polyunsaturated fatty acids resistant to lipid peroxidation, a process involved in motor neuron degeneration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Patients with ALS were randomly allocated to receive either RT001 or placebo for 24 weeks. After the double-blind period, all patients received RT001 during an open-label phase for 24 weeks. The primary outcome measures were safety and tolerability. Key efficacy outcomes included the ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R), percent predicted slow vital capacity, and plasma neurofilament light chain concentration.

RESULTS

In total, 43 patients (RT001 = 21; placebo = 22) were randomized. RT001 was well tolerated; one patient required dose reduction due to adverse events (AEs). Numerically, there were more AEs in the RT001 group compared to the placebo group (71% versus 55%, p = 0.35), with gastrointestinal symptoms being the most common (43% in RT001, 27% in placebo, p = 0.35). Two patients in the RT001 group experienced a serious AE, though unrelated to treatment. The least-squares mean difference in ALSFRS-R total score at week 24 of treatment was 1.90 (95% confidence interval = -1.39 to 5.19) in favor of RT001 (p = 0.25). The directions of other efficacy outcomes favored RT001 compared to placebo, although no inferential statistics were performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial data indicate that RT001 is safe and well tolerated. Given the exploratory nature of the study, a larger clinical trial is required to evaluate its efficacy.

Double blind trial of a deuterated form of linoleic acid (RT001) in Friedreich ataxia

OBJECTIVES

Friedreich ataxia is (FRDA) an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder associated with intrinsic oxidative damage, suggesting that decreasing lipid peroxidation (LPO) might ameliorate disease progression. The present study tested the ability of RT001, a deuterated form of linoleic acid (D2-LA), to alter disease severity in patients with FRDA in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

METHODS

Sixty-five subjects were recruited across six sites and received either placebo or active drug for an 11-month study. Subjects were evaluated at 0, 4, 9, and 11 months, with the primary outcome measure being maximum oxygen consumption (MVO2) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). A key secondary outcome measure was a composite statistical test using results from the timed 1-min walk (T1MW), peak workload, and MVO2.

RESULTS

Forty-five subjects completed the protocol. RT001 was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events related to drug. Plasma and red blood cell (RBC) membrane levels of D2-LA and its primary metabolite deuterated arachidonic acid (D2-AA) achieved steady-state concentrations by 4 months. No significant changes in MVO2 were observed for RT001 compared to placebo. Similarly, no differences between the groups were found in secondary or exploratory outcome measures. Post hoc evaluations also suggested minimal effects of RT001 at the dosages used in this study.

INTERPRETATIONS

The results of this study provide no evidence for a significant benefit of RT001 at the dosages tested in this Friedreich ataxia patient population.

The infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy rating scale (INAD-RS)

Background

INAD is an autosomal recessive neurogenetic disorder caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in PLA2G6. The downstream enzyme, iPLA₂, plays a critical role in cell membrane homeostasis by helping to regulate levels of phospholipids. The clinical presentation occurs between 6 months and 3 years with global developmental regression, hypotonia, and progressive spastic tetraparesis. Progression is often rapid, resulting in severe spasticity, visual impairment, and cognitive decline, with many children not surviving past the first decade of life. To date, no accepted tool for assessing the severity of INAD exists; other commonly used scales (e.g. CHOP-INTEND, Modified Ashworth, Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale) do not accurately gauge the current severity of INAD, nor are they sensitive/specific enough to monitor disease progression. Finally, these other scales are not appropriate, because they do not address the combination of CNS, peripheral nerve, and visual pathology that occurs in children with INAD.

Methods

We have developed and validated a structured neurological examination for INAD (scored out of 80). The examination includes six main categories of pediatric developmental evaluation: 1) gross motor-and-truncal-stability skills, 2) fine motor skills, 3) bulbar function, 4) ocular function, 5) temporo-frontal function, and, 6) Functional evaluation of the autonomic nervous system. A cohort of patients diagnosed with INAD were followed prospectively to validate the score against disease severity and disease progression.

Results

We show significant correlation between the total neurological assessment score and months since symptom onset with a statistically significant (p = 6.7 × 10^− 07) correlation between assessment score and disease onset. As hypothesized, the coefficient of months-since-symptom-onset is strongly negative, indicating a negative correlation between total score and months since symptom onset.

Conclusion

We have developed and validated a novel neurological assessment score in INAD that demonstrates strong correlation with disease severity and disease progression.

Treatment of infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy with RT001: A di-deuterated ethyl ester of linoleic acid: Report of two cases

BACKGROUND

Infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy (INAD) is a rare, autosomal recessive disease due to defects in PLA2G6 and is associated with lipid peroxidation. RT001 is a di-deuterated form of linoleic acid that protects lipids from oxidative damage.

METHODS

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and effectiveness of RT001 in two subjects with INAD (subject 1: 34 months; subject 2: 10 months). After screening and baseline evaluations, subjects received 1.8 g of RT001 BD. PK analysis and clinical evaluations were made periodically.

MAIN FINDINGS

Plasma levels of deuterated linoleic acid (D2-LA), deuterated arachidonic acid (D2-AA), D2-LA to total LA, and D2-AA to total AA ratios were measured. The targeted plasma D2-LA ratio (>20%) was achieved by month 1 and maintained throughout the study. RBC AA-ratios were 0.11 and 0.18 at 6 months for subjects 1 and 2; respectively. No treatment-related adverse events occurred. Limited slowing of disease progression and some return of lost developmental milestones were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral RT001 was administered safely in two subjects with INAD. Early findings suggest that the compound was well tolerated, metabolized and incorporated in the RBC membrane. A clinical trial is underway to assess efficacy.

The natural history of infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy

BACKGROUND

Infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy (INAD) is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disorder of early onset causing premature death. It results from biallelic pathogenic variants in PLA2G6, which encodes a calcium-independent phospholipase A2.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to outline the natural history of INAD and provide a comprehensive description of its clinical, radiological, laboratory, and molecular findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We comprehensively analyzed the charts of 28 patients: 16 patients from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 8 patients from North and South America and 4 patients from Europe with a molecularly confirmed diagnosis of PLA2G6-associated neurodegeneration (PLAN) and a clinical history consistent with INAD.

RESULTS

In our cohort, speech impairment and loss of gross motor milestones were the earliest signs of the disease. As the disease progressed, loss of fine motor milestones and bulbar dysfunction were observed. Temporo-frontal function was among the last of the milestones to be lost. Appendicular spastic hypertonia, axial hypotonia, and hyperreflexia were common neurological findings. Other common clinical findings include nystagmus (60.7%), seizures (42.9%), gastrointestinal disease (42.9%), skeletal deformities (35.7%), and strabismus (28.6%). Cerebellar atrophy and elevations in serum AST and LDH levels were consistent features of INAD. There was a statistically significant difference when comparing patients with non-sense/truncating variants compared with missense/in-frame deletions in the time of initial concern (p = 0.04), initial loss of language (p = 0.001), initial loss of fine motor skills (p = 0.009), and initial loss of bulbar skills (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

INAD is an ultra-rare neurodegenerative disorder that presents in early childhood, with a relentlessly progressive clinical course. Knowledge of the natural history of INAD may serve as a resource for healthcare providers to develop a targeted care plan and may facilitate the design of clinical trials to treat this disease.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tecarfarin, a novel vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant

Tecarfarin is a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) with reduced propensity for drug interactions. To evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and safety of tecarfarin, we performed single ascending dose (SAD) (n=66), multiple ascending dose (MAD) (n=43), and tecarfarin versus warfarin (n=28) studies in human volunteers. In the SAD, tecarfarin was administered to 5 of 6 subjects (1 received placebo) in each of 11 cohorts. AUC0-∞ exhibited linearity and dose proportionality. Elimination T1/2 ranged from 87–136 hours (h) across all doses. In the MAD, tecarfarin was administered to 5 of 6 volunteers in each of 7 cohorts. The starting dose was continued until the subject’s INR reached the target range (TR) of 1.7 to 2.0. Dosing was down-titrated if the TR was achieved. Elimination T1/2 ranged from 107–140 h. Doses <10 mg had insignificant effect on INR. Higher doses raised INRs and required down-titration to maintain the TR. Steady state INR dosing was 10–20 mg. INR declined promptly after discontinuation. In the comparative study, subjects received tecarfarin or warfarin and dose titrated to a TR of 1.5–2.0. Mean dose after TR was achieved was 13.9 mg (range 10.0–25.5 mg) for tecarfarin and 5.3 mg (range 2.5–9.0 mg) for warfarin. At similar INR levels, the concentration of coagulation factors II, VII, IX, and X were similar for tecarfarin and warfarin. Tecarfarin was tolerated well without serious adverse events in all three studies.

Supplementary Material to this article is available online at www.thrombosis-online.com.

Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year clinical follow-up from the Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SPIRIT) III trial

BACKGROUND

In the prospective randomized Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SPIRIT) III trial, an everolimus-eluting stent (EES) compared with a widely used paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) resulted in a statistically significant reduction in angiographic in-segment late loss at 8 months and noninferior rates of target vessel failure (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization) at 1 year. The safety and efficacy of EES after 1 year have not been reported.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 1002 patients with up to 2 de novo native coronary artery lesions (reference vessel diameter, 2.5 to 3.75 mm; lesion length < or =28 mm) were randomized 2:1 to EES versus PES. Antiplatelet therapy consisted of aspirin indefinitely and a thienopyridine for > or =6 months. Between 1 and 2 years, patients treated with EES compared with PES tended to have fewer episodes of protocol-defined stent thrombosis (0.2% versus 1.0%; P=0.10) and myocardial infarctions (0.5% versus 1.7%; P=0.12), with similar rates of cardiac death (0.3% versus 0.3%; P=1.0) and target vessel revascularization (2.9% versus 3.0%; P=1.0). As a result, at the completion of the 2-year follow-up, treatment with EES compared with PES resulted in a significant 32% reduction in target vessel failure (10.7% versus 15.4%; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.48 to 0.98; P=0.04) and a 45% reduction in major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization; 7.3% versus 12.8%; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.83; P=0.004). Among the 360 patients who discontinued clopidogrel or ticlopidine after 6 months, stent thrombosis subsequently developed in 0.4% of EES patients versus 2.6% of PES patients (P=0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with EES rather than PES experienced significantly improved event-free survival at a 2-year follow-up in the SPIRIT III trial, with continued divergence of the hazard curves for target vessel failure and major adverse cardiac events between 1 and 2 years evident. The encouraging trends toward fewer stent thrombosis episodes after 6 months in EES-treated patients who discontinued a thienopyridine and after 1 year in all patients treated with EES rather than PES deserve further study.

Comparison of an everolimus-eluting stent and a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial

CONTEXT

A thin, cobalt-chromium stent eluting the antiproliferative agent everolimus from a nonadhesive, durable fluoropolymer has shown promise in preliminary studies in improving clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of an everolimus-eluting stent compared with a widely used paclitaxel-eluting stent.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

The SPIRIT III trial, a prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled trial enrolling patients at 65 academic and community-based US institutions between June 22, 2005, and March 15, 2006. Patients were 1002 men and women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in lesions 28 mm or less in length and with reference vessel diameter between 2.5 and 3.75 mm. Angiographic follow-up was prespecified at 8 months in 564 patients and completed in 436 patients. Clinical follow-up was performed at 1, 6, 9, and 12 months.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive the everolimus-eluting stent (n = 669) or the paclitaxel-eluting stent (n = 333).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was noninferiority or superiority of angiographic in-segment late loss. The major secondary end point was noninferiority assessment of target vessel failure events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization) at 9 months. An additional secondary end point was evaluation of major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization) at 9 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Angiographic in-segment late loss was significantly less in the everolimus-eluting stent group compared with the paclitaxel group (mean, 0.14 [SD, 0.41] mm vs 0.28 [SD, 0.48] mm; difference, -0.14 [95% CI, -0.23 to -0.05]; P < or = .004). The everolimus stent was noninferior to the paclitaxel stent for target vessel failure at 9 months (7.2% vs 9.0%, respectively; difference, -1.9% [95% CI, -5.6% to 1.8%]; relative risk, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.51 to 1.23]; P < .001). The everolimus stent compared with the paclitaxel stent resulted in significant reductions in composite major adverse cardiac events both at 9 months (4.6% vs 8.1%; relative risk, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.94]; P = .03) and at 1 year (6.0% vs 10.3%; relative risk, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.37 to 0.90]; P = .02), due to fewer myocardial infarctions and target lesion revascularization procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large-scale, prospective randomized trial, an everolimus-eluting stent compared with a paclitaxel-eluting stent resulted in reduced angiographic late loss, noninferior rates of target vessel failure, and fewer major adverse cardiac events during 1 year of follow-up.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00180479.

Non–Polymer-Based Paclitaxel-Coated Coronary Stents for the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Coronary Lesions

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel, a microtubule-stabilizing compound with potent antitumor activity, has been shown to inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration. The DELIVER trial was a prospective, randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical evaluation of the non-polymer-based paclitaxel-coated ACHIEVE stent compared with the stainless steel Multi-Link (ML) PENTA stent.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 1043 patients with focal de novo coronary lesions, <25 mm in length, in 2.5- to 4.0-mm vessels were randomized (ACHIEVE n=524; ML PENTA n=519). Angiographic follow-up was performed in a subset of 442 patients (ACHIEVE n=228; ML PENTA n=214). Prespecified end points were a 40% reduction in target-vessel failure at 9 months (primary clinical end point) and a 50% reduction in binary restenosis at 8 months (major secondary end point). Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. Patients in ACHIEVE had more type C lesions and a larger reference diameter. At follow-up, stent late loss was 0.81 versus 0.98 mm (P=0.003), stent binary restenosis was 14.9% versus 20.6% (P=0.076), and target-vessel failure was 11.9% versus 14.5% (P=0.12) for ACHIEVE and ML PENTA, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACHIEVE paclitaxel-coated stent decreased neointimal proliferation compared with the bare-metal PENTA stent; however, this reduction was insufficient to meet the prespecified primary end point of target-vessel failure and the secondary end point of binary restenosis.

Analysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial: a randomized trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated a large group of patients enrolled in a double-blind randomized trial of the sirolimus-eluting stent to document whether the initial clinical improvement seen in previous smaller series is maintained out to 12 months and to study the potential treatment effect in patient subsets known to be at increased risk of restenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 1058 patients with de novo native coronary stenosis undergoing clinically indicated percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned to sirolimus-eluting stent (533) or control bare stent (525). Procedural success and in-hospital outcomes were excellent and did not differ between the 2 groups. At 9 months, clinical restenosis, defined as target-lesion revascularization, was 4.1% in the sirolimus limb versus 16.6% in the control limb (P<0.001). At 12 months, the absolute difference in target-lesion revascularization continued to increase and was 4.9% versus 20% (P<0.001). There were no differences in death or myocardial infarction rates. In high-risk patient subsets, defined by vessel size, lesion length, and presence of diabetes mellitus, there was a 70% to 80% reduction in clinical restenosis at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Placement of the sirolimus-eluting stent results in continued clinical improvement at 1 year after initial implantation, with significant reduction in clinical restenosis as defined by target-lesion revascularization. Between 9 and 12 months, the absolute reduction of clinical restenosis continues to increase. Even in high-risk subsets of patients, there is a 70% to 80% relative reduction in clinical restenosis at 12 months with this drug-eluting stent.

Usefulness of beta radiation for de novo and in-stent restenotic lesions in saphenous vein grafts

Following successful angioplasty of 49 saphenous vein graft lesions, a novel, self-centering phosphorus-32 solid foil beta source encapsulated within a dual-balloon membrane was used to deliver 20 Gy 1 mm into the vessel wall. Clinical and angiographic recurrence rates at 12 months were low, especially in de novo lesions.

A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study measuring the effect of an adenosine agonist on infarct size reduction in patients undergoing primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: the ADMIRE (AmP579 Delivery for Myocardial Infarction REduction) study

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that myocardial ischemic preconditioning and reperfusion injury may be mediated by adenosine A1 and A2 receptors. AMP579 is a mixed adenosine agonist with both A1 and A2 effects. In animal models of acute myocardial infarction (MI), AMP579 reduced infarct size at serum levels of 15 to 24 ng/mL.

METHODS

The AMP579 Delivery for Myocardial Infarction REduction study evaluated AMP579 in a double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial of 311 patients undergoing primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) after acute ST-segment elevation MI. Patients were randomly assigned to placebo or to 3 different doses of AMP579 continuously infused over 6 hours. The primary end point was final MI size measured by technetium Tc-99m sestamibi scanning at 120 to 216 hours after PTCA. Secondary end points included myocardial salvage and salvage index at the same time interval (in a subset of patients who underwent baseline technetium Tc-99m sestamibi scan), left ventricular ejection fraction and heart failure at 4 to 6 weeks, duration of hospitalization, and cardiac events at 4 weeks and 6 months.

RESULTS

Final infarct size did not differ among the placebo group and the active treatment groups for either anterior MI or nonanterior MI. In patients with anterior MI, median myocardial salvage was increasingly higher in the groups receiving ascending dosages of AMP579 plus PTCA. Serum levels approaching levels shown to reduce infarct size in animal models were achieved only in the 60-mcg/kg treatment group.

CONCLUSION

AMP579 was safe at the doses tested, but it did not reduce infarct size. There was a trend toward greater myocardial salvage in treated patients with anterior MI.

Enoxaparin and abciximab adjunctive pharmacotherapy during percutaneous coronary intervention

Randomized controlled trials of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes have established the superiority of enoxaparin (versus unfractionated heparin) for reducing adverse ischemic outcomes. Furthermore, adjunctive abciximab therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Since algorithms for integrating these pharmacotherapies have not been determined, patients undergoing elective PCI were enrolled into 2 distinct and separate studies conducted by the National Investigators Collaborating on Enoxaparin (NICE) study groups (NICE 1 and NICE 4 studies). Patients in NICE 1 were administered enoxaparin 1.0 mg/kg intravenously (without abciximab) and those enrolled in NICE 4 were administered a reduced dose (0.75 mg/kg) of enoxaparin in combination with standard-dose abciximab intravenously during PCI. Bleeding events and ischemic outcomes assessed in-hospital and at 30-days post-PCI were infrequent with either pharmacologic regimen. In the dose regimens studied, enoxaparin with or without abciximab appears to provide safe and effective anticoagulation during PCI. The combination of reduced-dose enoxaparin and abciximab was associated with a low incidence of adverse outcomes (bleeding or ischemic events). Additional studies may be required to establish the relative safety and efficacy of this new adjunctive pharmacologic strategy when compared with the combination of low-dose, weight-adjusted unfractionated heparin and abciximab.

Final results of a randomized trial comparing the MULTI-LINK stent with the Palmaz-Schatz stent for narrowings in native coronary arteries

The MULTI-LINK (ML) stent is a novel second generation coronary stent. The ACS MultiLink Stent Clinical Equivalence in De Novo Lesions Trial (ASCENT) randomized 1,040 patients with single, de novo native vessel lesions to treatment with the ML stent or the benchmark Palmaz-Schatz (PS) stent, to demonstrate that the ML stent was not inferior to (i.e., equivalent or better than) the PS stent in terms of target vessel failure by 9 months. Successful stent delivery was achieved in 98.8% versus 96.9% of patients, with a slightly lower postprocedural diameter stenosis (8% vs 10%, p = 0.04), and no difference in 30-day major adverse cardiac events (5.0% vs 6.5%) for the ML stent versus the PS stent. The primary end point of target vessel failure at 9 months was seen in 15.1% of ML-treated patients versus 16.7% of PS-treated patients, with the ML proving to be equal or superior to the PS stent (p <0.001 by test for equivalency). In a prespecified subset, angiographic restudy showed a nonsignificant trend for reduced ML restenosis (16.0% vs 22.1%). Thus, the ML stent showed excellent deliverability and acute results, with 9-month clinical and 6-month angiographic outcomes that were equivalent or better than the PS stent.

Procedural and late outcomes following MULTI-LINK DUET coronary stent deployment

The MULTI-LINK DUET is the next generation MULTI-LINK stent with modified strut geometry. Safety and efficacy of the MULTI-LINK DUET were evaluated in a prospective multicenter registry and were compared with prior MULTI-LINK stent experience from the ASCENT randomized trial. A total of 270 patients received 302 MULTI-LINK DUET stents and were evaluated using a composite primary end point of major cardiac events (death, Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction, and requirement for coronary revascularization) attributable to the target stenosis cumulative to 30 days following enrollment. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed at a mean follow-up of 6 +/- 2 (+/-SD) months. No difference in primary end point or in angiographic restenosis to 6 months was observed between MULTI-LINK DUET and MULTI-LINK experiences. The MULTI-LINK DUET demonstrated improved device and procedural success, less postprocedural in-stent stenosis, larger postprocedural minimal lumen diameter, and fewer postprocedural marginal dissections compared with the MULTI-LINK stent. Multivariate regression modeling identified stent length, diabetes mellitus, poststent minimal lumen diameter, lesion eccentricity, and current smoking as independent predictors of in-stent restenosis. Thus, the MULTI-LINK DUET Registry demonstrates enhanced procedural performance with clinical and angiographic outcomes similar to those previously observed for the MULTI-LINK stent in the ASCENT randomized trial.

Regional intracoronary analgesia during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

The ischemic pain associated with balloon inflation during coronary angioplasty remains a significant source of procedural discomfort and sets a limit on the duration of percutaneous transluminal intravascular interventions. The present study examined whether intracoronary lidocaine reduced the pain of coronary angioplasty. Sixteen patients undergoing elective coronary angioplasty underwent three 90 sec balloon inflations: the first with administration of no intracoronary agent, and the second and third with administration of one or the other of placebo or an equal volume of lidocaine (10-16 mg). Placebo or lidocaine were randomized in administration sequence and were given just before balloon inflation. During the occlusions, pain was scored on an ordinal scale (0 = no pain; 10 = most severe pain). Lidocaine delayed the onset of pain (23 +/- 4 vs. 48 +/- 7 sec, P < 0.005) and reduced its magnitude (at end-inflation: 7.8 +/- 1.3 vs. 3.2 +/- 1.3, P < 0.01). There were no significant hemodynamic or electrophysiologic effects in this group of patients, although atrioventricular conduction was delayed when lidocaine was administered into the epicardial coronary which had the atrioventricular node artery as a branch. Intracoronary analgesia with lidocaine is safe and effective in a select group of patients with normal ventricular function undergoing elective coronary angioplasty.

Influence of coronary occlusion during PTCA on end-systolic and end-diastolic pressure-volume relations in humans

The influence of acute coronary occlusion on systolic and diastolic left ventricular pressure-volume relations was studied in 10 patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Pressure-volume relations were obtained by conductance catheter and micromanometer techniques and with volume load altered by transient inferior vena caval occlusion. End-systolic and end-diastolic pressure-volume relations were obtained at baseline, during 60-90 seconds of ischemia, and at return to baseline after angioplasty balloon deflation. Coronary occlusion significantly altered systolic and diastolic chamber function. Systolic dysfunction was characterized by a reproducible rightward shift of the end-systolic pressure-volume relation (+25.4 +/- 18.4 ml) that was greater for proximal left anterior descending and circumflex coronary artery occlusions (+41 ml) than for distal or right coronary artery occlusions (+15.4 ml, p less than 0.05). Occlusion also lowered chamber systolic function indexes, such as the end-systolic pressure-volume relation slope (from 4.2 to 2.8 mm Hg/ml) and preload recruitable stroke work (from 97 to 78.6 mm Hg). All systolic (and diastolic) changes were resolved with successful angioplasty. Diastolic abnormalities during angioplasty were characterized by prolonged pressure relaxation and an upward shift of the resting diastolic pressure-volume data and by an apparent increase in chamber elastic stiffness. However, when end-diastolic data from multiple beats during inferior vena caval occlusion were compared, control and ischemic end-diastolic pressure-volume relations displayed little or no difference. Thus, elevations in resting diastolic pressure-volume relations and apparent increase in chamber elastic stiffness during coronary occlusion in humans appear dominated by altered right ventricular or pericardial loading. These data indicate that pressure-volume analysis is useful in assessing the functional significance of coronary lesions and reperfusion.

Use of a conductance (volume) catheter and transient inferior vena caval occlusion for rapid determination of pressure-volume relationships in man

Determination of left ventricular pressure-volume relationships in situ ideally requires both a method for easy measurement of multiple pressure-volume loops and a rapid and reversible means of altering load. We report a technique, previously used in animals, that combines conductance catheter volumes and rapid inferior vena caval occlusion to permit routine measurement of calibrated P-V relationships in man for the first time. An 8F volume catheter with a 3F micromanometer tipped pressure catheter placed through its lumen was advanced to the left ventricular apex through a femoral artery. A thermodilution output catheter was placed through a 9F femoral venous sheath and later replaced with an IVC balloon occlusion catheter, through which a 2.5F bipolar wire was advanced for atrial pacing. A specialized data system facilitated collection, editing, and data analysis at the time of cardiac catheterization. Absolute volume calibration required cardiac output measurement and injection of hypertonic saline. IVC occlusion decreased peak left ventricular pressure by 42 +/- 17 (SD) (P less than .001) mm Hg in 15 patients. Endsystolic pressure-volume relationships (ESPVR) were determined with 5-8 cardiac cycles with an average of r2 of 0.94 +/- 0.05 and were generally reproducible. The slope of the ESPVR demonstrated consistency among a group of normal patients (n = 6), and was significantly lower than the slope derived from a group of patients with ventricular hypertrophy (n = 9). We conclude that left ventricular pressure-volume relationships can be easily and repeatedly determined as part of a routine cardiac catheterization in man.