1
|
Gerido LH, Resnicow K, Stoffel EM, Tomlin T, Cook-Deegan R, Cline M, Coffin A, Holdren J, Majumder MA, He Z. Big advocacy, little recognition: the hidden work of Black patients in precision medicine. J Community Genet 2023; 14:657-665. [PMID: 37775604 PMCID: PMC10725382 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-023-00673-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
As cost-effective next-generation genome sequencing rapidly develops, calls for greater inclusion of Black people in genomic research, policy, and practice are necessary for effective translation of genomic science into precision population health and medicine. Employing a community-based participatory mixed methods research design, we developed a semi-structured survey that was disseminated to three cancer advocacy organizations. Of the 81 survey respondents 49 (60%) self-identified as Black, and 26 (32%) indicated a prior breast cancer diagnosis. Black participants' expressed concerns about genetic testing were evenly distributed between concerns that could be addressed through genetic counseling (24%) and concerns about subsequent use of their genetic data (27%). Patient advocates contributed to contextualization of respondent concerns in terms of community experiences. Although genetic counseling services and policies governing genomic data use are not always accessible to many Black communities, advocates on our research team provided a bridge to discussion of the intersection between respondent concerns and the roles advocates play in filling gaps in access to genetic counseling and data governance. Concerns expressed by Black patients underscore a shared need among all patients for access to education, inclusion in research, and assurances regarding the use and handling of genetic data. Black cancer patients have joined in patient-led efforts to overcome systemic inequities in cancer care to improve their health outcomes through representation. Often their efforts are overshadowed by a relentless burden of continued health disparities. Future research should support their hidden work as a means to reduce barriers and improve representation in genomic databases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynette Hammond Gerido
- Department of Bioethics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106-4976, USA.
| | - Kenneth Resnicow
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Elena M Stoffel
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | | - Melissa Cline
- University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Amy Coffin
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | | | | - Zhe He
- Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gerido LH, Resnicow K, Stoffel E, Tomlin T, Cook-Deegan R, Cline M, Coffin A, Holdren J, Majumder MA, He Z. Big Advocacy, Little Recognition: The Hidden Work of Black Patients in Precision Medicine. Res Sq 2023:rs.3.rs-2340760. [PMID: 36993185 PMCID: PMC10055541 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2340760/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
Public health genomics prioritizes effective and ethical translation of genomic science into population health precision medicine. With the rapid development of cost-effective, next-generation genome sequencing, calls are growing for greater inclusion of Black people in genomic research, policy, and practice. Genetic testing is often the first step in precision medicine. This study explores racial differences in patient concerns about genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer. Employing a community-based participatory mixed methods research design, we developed a semi-structured survey that was shared broadly. There were 81 survey respondents, of which, forty-nine (60%) self-identified as Black, twenty-six (32%) indicated they had a history of a breast cancer diagnosis, or had received BRCA genetic testing. Black participants who expressed concerns about genetic testing were fairly equally distributed between concerns that could be addressed with genetic counseling (24%) and concerns about the subsequent use of their genetic data (27%). The concerns expressed by the participants in our study underscore a need for transparent disclosures and assurances regarding the use and handling of genetic data. These findings should be viewed in context with patient-led efforts to overcome systemic inequities in cancer care, as Black cancer patients have joined forces with advocates and researchers to develop protective health data initiatives and to improve their representation in genomic datasets. Future research should prioritize the information needs and concerns of Black cancer patients. Interventions should be developed to support their hidden work as a means to reduce barriers and improve representation in precision medicine.
Collapse
|
3
|
|
4
|
Majumder MA, Scott CT. Off-Target Effects of a Defense of Denial. Am J Bioeth 2018; 18:22-24. [PMID: 30265597 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1498944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
|
5
|
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of US laws and related guidance documents affecting transfer of genomic data to third countries, addressing the domains of consent, privacy, security, compatible processing/adequacy, and oversight. In general, US laws governing research and disclosure and use of data generated within the health care system do not impose different requirements on transfers to researchers and service providers based in third countries compared with US-based researchers or service providers. Of note, the US lacks a comprehensive data protection regime. Data protections are piecemeal, spread across bodies of law that target specific kinds of research or data generated or held by specific kinds of actors involved in the delivery of health care. Oversight is also distributed across a range of bodies, including institutional review boards and data access committees. The conclusion to this paper examines future directions in US law and policy, including proposals for more comprehensive protections for personal data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Anderlik Majumder
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Majumder MA, Guerrini CJ. Federal Privacy Protections: Ethical Foundations, Sources of Confusion in Clinical Medicine, and Controversies in Biomedical Research. AMA J Ethics 2016; 18:288-98. [PMID: 27003001 DOI: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.3.pfor5-1603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Anderlik Majumder
- Associate professor of medicine at the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas
| | - Christi J Guerrini
- Research instructor at the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, and a graduate student at University of Texas School of Public Health
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Majumder MA. More mud, less crystal? Ambivalence, disability, and PGD. Am J Bioeth 2012; 12:26-28. [PMID: 22452472 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2012.656817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
|
8
|
Majumder MA. Respecting difference and moving beyond regulation: tasks for U.S. bioethics commissions in the twenty-first century. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2005; 15:289-303. [PMID: 16250117 DOI: 10.1353/ken.2005.0021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
This article focuses on two possible missions for a national bioethics commission. The first is handling differences of worldview, political orientation, and discipline. Recent work in political philosophy emphasizes regard for the dignity of difference manifested in "conversation" that seeks understanding rather than agreement. The President's Council on Bioethics gets a mixed review in this area. The second is experimenting with prophetic bioethics. "Prophetic bioethics" is a term coined by Daniel Callahan to describe an alternative to compromise-seeking "regulatory bioethics." It involves a critique of modern medicine. In the contemporary context, the areas of biotechnology and access to health care cry out for prophetic attention. The Council has addressed biotechnology; unfortunately, that experience suggests that the kind of prophecy that it practices poses risks to conversation. With regard to access issues, the article proposes an effort that unites themes of human dignity, solidarity, and limits in support of reform, while highlighting, rather than papering over, differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Anderlik Majumder
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Majumder MA. The roles of ethicists in managed care litigation. J Law Med Ethics 2005; 33:264-73. [PMID: 16083085 DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00492.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
In the lead article in this symposium issue, Edward Imwinkelried follows other scholars in distinguishing among three types of tasks for ethicists serving as expert witnesses: (1) descriptive (e.g., addressing the existence and content of relevant codes of ethics or guidelines, or the correspondence, or lack of correspondence, between relevant codes or guidelines and the parties’ practices); (2) metaethical (e.g., clarifying concepts, critiquing the logic of a particular argument or position); and (3) normative (e.g., addressing what the standard or practice should be). He finds agreement that the admissibility of descriptive or metaethical evidence rests upon the usual criteria of helpfulness and reliability. He breaks new ground in arguing that normative evidence typically relates to the judge's legislative rather than adjudicative function and therefore need not satisfy the usual standards for admissibility in order to be considered.
Collapse
|
10
|
Majumder MA, Brakman SV. The politics of embryo transfer. Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass) 2005; 12:10-1. [PMID: 16363074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Anderlik Majumder
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Few things seem more a part of the material world than biological specimens. Yet the processes by which collections of specimens are assembled, translated into information, combined with more information, and distributed are taking research repositories into the virtual realm.The term “virtual” has a number of meanings, and so a research repository can qualify as virtual in a variety of ways. The term would seem to apply, for example, to (1) constructing a repository by forming a network among institutions; (2) using the Internet or the World Wide Web to solicit specimens and information; (3) integrating web-based technology into the operation of the bank; (4) using the Internet or web-based technology to manage relationships with donors or collection sites and recipients; and (5) digitizing specimens. The all-digital repository would seem the most virtual of all possible repositories, a true cyberbank.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Anderlik Majumder
- Center for Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Majumder MA. Uncharitable care? Hastings Cent Rep 2004; 34:7. [PMID: 15379091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
|
13
|
Majumder MA. Supplementing the fairness framework: system-level and implementation concerns. Am J Bioeth 2004; 4:112-4; discussion W40-2. [PMID: 16192165 DOI: 10.1080/15265160490498037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
|
14
|
|