1
|
Catarci M, Guadagni S, Masedu F, Ruffo G, Viola MG, Borghi F, Baldazzi G, Scatizzi M. Three-row versus two-row circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 prospective cohorts. Int J Surg 2023; 109:2312-2323. [PMID: 37195782 PMCID: PMC10442086 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since most anastomoses after left-sided colorectal resections are performed with a circular stapler, any technological change in stapling devices may influence the incidence of anastomotic adverse events. The aim of the present study was to analyze the effect of a three-row circular stapler on anastomotic leakage and related morbidity after left-sided colorectal resections. MATERIALS AND METHODS A circular stapled anastomosis was performed in 4255 (50.9%) out of 8359 patients enrolled in two prospective multicenter studies in Italy, and, after exclusion criteria to reduce heterogeneity, 2799 (65.8%) cases were retrospectively analyzed through a 1:1 propensity score-matching model including 20 covariates relative to patient characteristics, to surgery and to perioperative management. Two well-balanced groups of 425 patients each were obtained: group (A) - true population of interest, anastomosis performed with a three-row circular stapler; group (B) - control population, anastomosis performed with a two-row circular stapler. The target of inferences was the average treatment effect in the treated (ATT). The primary endpoints were overall and major anastomotic leakage and overall anastomotic bleeding; the secondary endpoints were overall and major morbidity and mortality rates. The results of multiple logistic regression analyses for the outcomes, including the 20 covariates selected for matching, were presented as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS Group A versus group B showed a significantly lower risk of overall anastomotic leakage (2.1 vs. 6.1%; OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.15-0.73; P =0.006), major anastomotic leakage (2.1 vs. 5.2%; OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.17-0.87; P =0.022), and major morbidity (3.5 vs. 6.6% events; OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.24-0.91; P =0.026). CONCLUSION The use of three-row circular staplers independently reduced the risk of anastomotic leakage and related morbidity after left-sided colorectal resection. Twenty-five patients were required to avoid one leakage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, Rome
- General Surgery Unit, “C.&G. Mazzoni” Hospital, Ascoli Piceno
| | | | - Francesco Masedu
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila
| | - Giacomo Ruffo
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella (VR)
| | - Massimo G. Viola
- General Surgery Unit, Cardinale G. Panico Hospital, Tricase (LE)
| | - Felice Borghi
- Oncologic Surgery Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo (TO)
- General & Oncologic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo
| | - Gianandrea Baldazzi
- General Surgery Unit, ASST Ovest Milanese, Legnano (MI)
- General Surgery Unit, ASST Nord Milano, Sesto San Giovanni (MI)
| | - Marco Scatizzi
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata & Serristori Hospital, Firenze, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rapposelli IG, Shimose S, Kumada T, Okamura S, Hiraoka A, Di Costanzo GG, Marra F, Tamburini E, Forgione A, Foschi FG, Silletta M, Lonardi S, Masi G, Scartozzi M, Nakano M, Shibata H, Kawata K, Pellino A, Vivaldi C, Lai E, Takata A, Tajiri K, Toyoda H, Tortora R, Campani C, Viola MG, Piscaglia F, Conti F, Fulgenzi CAM, Frassineti GL, Rizzato MD, Salani F, Astara G, Torimura T, Atsukawa M, Tada T, Burgio V, Rimini M, Cascinu S, Casadei-Gardini A. Identification of lenvatinib prognostic index via recursive partitioning analysis in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100190. [PMID: 34144271 PMCID: PMC8219999 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND After the advent of new treatment options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the identification of prognostic factors is crucial for the selection of the most appropriate therapy for each patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS With the aim to fill this gap, we applied recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) to a cohort of 404 patients treated with lenvatinib. RESULTS The application of RPA resulted in a classification based on five variables that originated a new prognostic score, the lenvatinib prognostic index (LEP) index, identifying three groups: low risk [patients with prognostic nutritional index (PNI) >43.3 and previous trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE)]; medium risk [patients with PNI >43.3 but without previous TACE and patients with PNI <43.3, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade 1 and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B (BCLC-B)]; high risk [patients with PNI <43.3 and ALBI grade 2 and patients with PNI <43.3, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade 1 and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C (BCLC-C)]. Median overall survival was 29.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 22.8-29.8 months] in low risk patients (n = 128), 17.0 months (95% CI 15.0-24.0 months) in medium risk (n = 162) and 8.9 months (95% CI 8.0-10.7 months) in high risk (n = 114); low risk hazard ratio (HR) 1 (reference group), medium risk HR 1.95 (95% CI 1.38-2.74), high risk HR 4.84 (95% CI 3.16-7.43); P < 0.0001. The LEP index was validated in a cohort of 127 Italian patients treated with lenvatinib. While the same classification did not show a prognostic value in a cohort of 311 patients treated with sorafenib, we also show a possible predictive role in favor of lenvatinib in the low risk group. CONCLUSIONS LEP index is a promising, easy-to-use tool that may be used to stratify patients undergoing systemic treatment of advanced HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I G Rapposelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori 'Dino Amadori'-IRST, Meldola, Italy
| | - S Shimose
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
| | - T Kumada
- Faculty of Nursing, Gifu Kyoritsu University, Ogaki, Japan
| | - S Okamura
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
| | - A Hiraoka
- Gastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - G G Di Costanzo
- Liver Unit, Department of Transplantation, Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - F Marra
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - E Tamburini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Card. G. Panico Hospital of Tricase, Tricase, Italy
| | - A Forgione
- Division of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Italy
| | - F G Foschi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faenza Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Faenza, Italy
| | - M Silletta
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - S Lonardi
- Early Phase Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit 1, Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - G Masi
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - M Scartozzi
- Medical Oncology, University and University Hospital of Cagliari, Italy
| | - M Nakano
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
| | - H Shibata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tokushima Prefectural Central Hospital, Tokushima, Japan
| | - K Kawata
- Hepatology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - A Pellino
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - C Vivaldi
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - E Lai
- Medical Oncology, University and University Hospital of Cagliari, Italy
| | - A Takata
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
| | - K Tajiri
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan
| | - H Toyoda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan
| | - R Tortora
- Liver Unit, Department of Transplantation, Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - C Campani
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - M G Viola
- Department of Surgery, Card. G. Panico Hospital of Tricase, Tricase, Italy
| | - F Piscaglia
- Division of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Italy
| | - F Conti
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faenza Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Faenza, Italy
| | - C A M Fulgenzi
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - G L Frassineti
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori 'Dino Amadori'-IRST, Meldola, Italy
| | - M D Rizzato
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - F Salani
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - G Astara
- Medical Oncology, University and University Hospital of Cagliari, Italy
| | - T Torimura
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
| | - M Atsukawa
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - T Tada
- Department of Internal Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Himeji Hospital, Himeji, Japan
| | - V Burgio
- Unit of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - M Rimini
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Division of Oncology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - S Cascinu
- Unit of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - A Casadei-Gardini
- Unit of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|