1
|
Ernst G, Amorim MJB, Bottoms M, Brooks AC, Hodson ME, Kimmel S, Kotschik P, Marx MT, Natal-da-Luz T, Pelosi C, Pieper S, Schimera A, Scott-Fordsmand J, Sharples A, Sousa JP, van Gestel CAM, van Hall B, Bergtold M. Intermediate-tier options in the environmental risk assessment of plant protection products for soil invertebrates-Synthesis of a workshop. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024; 20:780-793. [PMID: 37563990 DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
The European environmental risk assessment (ERA) of plant protection products follows a tiered approach. The approach for soil invertebrates currently consists of two steps, starting with a Tier 1 assessment based on reproduction toxicity tests with earthworms, springtails, and predatory mites. In case an unacceptable risk is identified at Tier 1, field studies can be conducted as a higher-tier option. For soil invertebrates, intermediate tiers are not implemented. Hence, there is limited possibility to include additional information for the ERA to address specific concerns when the Tier 1 fails, as an alternative to, for example, a field study. Calibrated intermediate-tier approaches could help to address risks for soil invertebrates with less time and resources but also with sufficient certainty. A multistakeholder workshop was held on 2-4 March 2022 to discuss potential intermediate-tier options, focusing on four possible areas: (1) natural soil testing, (2) single-species tests (other than standard species), (3) assessing recovery in laboratory tests, and (4) the use of assembled soil multispecies test systems. The participants acknowledged a large potential in the intermediate-tier options but concluded that some issues need to be clarified before routine application of these approaches in the ERA is possible, that is, sensitivity, reproducibility, reliability, and standardization of potential new test systems. The definition of suitable assessment factors needed to calibrate the approaches to the protection goals was acknowledged. The aims of the workshop were to foster scientific exchange and a data-driven dialog, to discuss how the different approaches could be used in the risk assessment, and to identify research priorities for future work to address uncertainties and strengthen the tiered approach in the ERA for soil invertebrates. This article outlines the background, proposed methods, technical challenges, difficulties and opportunities in the ERA, and conclusions of the workshop. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:780-793. © 2023 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregor Ernst
- Bayer AG, CropScience Division, Monheim, Germany
| | - Mónica J B Amorim
- Department of Biology and CESAM, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Melanie Bottoms
- Syngenta Ltd., Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell, UK
| | - Amy C Brooks
- Cambridge Environmental Assessments, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mark E Hodson
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Pia Kotschik
- German Environment Agency (UBA), Dessau-Roßlau, Germany
| | | | - Tiago Natal-da-Luz
- Associate Laboratory TERRA, Department of Life Sciences, CFE-Centre for Functional Ecology - Science for the People and the Planet, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Céline Pelosi
- INRAE, Avignon Université, UMR EMMAH, Avignon, France
| | - Silvia Pieper
- German Environment Agency (UBA), Dessau-Roßlau, Germany
| | | | | | | | - José P Sousa
- Associate Laboratory TERRA, Department of Life Sciences, CFE-Centre for Functional Ecology - Science for the People and the Planet, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Cornelis A M van Gestel
- Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Institute for Life and Environment (A-LIFE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart van Hall
- Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Institute for Life and Environment (A-LIFE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rumohr Q, Baden CU, Bergtold M, Marx MT, Oellers J, Schade M, Toschki A, Maus C. Drivers and pressures behind insect decline in Central and Western Europe based on long-term monitoring data. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0289565. [PMID: 37611013 PMCID: PMC10446172 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Insect declines have been discussed intensively among experts, policymakers, and the public. Albeit, decreasing trends have been reported for a long time for various regions in Europe and North America, but the controversial discussion over the role of specific drivers and pressures still remains. A reason for these uncertainties lies within the complex networks of inter-dependent biotic and abiotic factors as well as anthropogenic activities that influence habitats, communities, populations, and individual organisms. Many recent publications aim to identify both the extent of the observed declines and potential drivers. With this literature analysis, we provide an overview of the drivers and pressures and their inter-relationships, which were concluded in the scientific literature, using some of the best-studied insect groups as examples. We conducted a detailed literature evaluation of publications on Carabidae (Coleoptera) and Lepidoptera trends with data for at least 6 years in countries of Central and Western Europe, with a focus on agricultural landscapes. From the 82 publications identified as relevant, we extracted all reported trends and classified the respective factors described according to the DPSIR model. Further, we analysed the level of scientific verification (presumed vs correlated vs examined) within these papers for these cited stressors. The extracted trends for both species groups underline the reported overall declining trend. Whether negative or positive trends were reported in the papers, our semi-quantitative analysis shows that changes in insect populations are primarily anthropogenically driven by agriculture, climate change, nature conservation activities, urbanisation, and other anthropogenic activities. Most of the identified pressures were found to act on habitat level, only a fraction attributed to direct effects to the insects. While our analysis gives an overview of existing research concerning abundance and biodiversity trends of carabids and lepidopterans, it also shows gaps in scientific data in this area, in particular in monitoring the pressures along with the monitoring of abundance trends. The scientific basis for assessing biodiversity changes in the landscape is essential to help all stakeholders involved to shape, e.g. agriculture and other human activities, in a more sustainable way, balancing human needs such as food production with conservation of nature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quintana Rumohr
- gaiac, Research Institute for Ecosystem Analysis and Assessment, Aachen, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Johanna Oellers
- gaiac, Research Institute for Ecosystem Analysis and Assessment, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Toschki
- gaiac, Research Institute for Ecosystem Analysis and Assessment, Aachen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pamminger T, Schneider C, Maas R, Bergtold M. Establishing realistic exposure estimates of solitary bee larvae via pollen for use in risk assessment. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022; 18:308-313. [PMID: 34241949 PMCID: PMC9292624 DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Bees foraging in agricultural habitats can be exposed to plant protection products. To limit the risk of adverse events, a robust risk assessment is needed, which requires reliable estimates for the expected exposure. The exposure pathways to developing solitary bees in particular are not well described and, in the currently proposed form, rely on limited information. To build a scaling model predicting the amount of protein developing solitary bees need based on adult body weight, we used published data on the volume of pollen solitary bees provide for their offspring. This model was tested against and ultimately updated with additional literature data on bee weight and protein content of emerged bees. We rescaled this model, based on the known pollen protein content of bee-visited flowers, to predict the expected amount of pollen a generalist solitary bee would likely provide based on its adult body weight, and tested these predictions in the field. We found overall agreement between the models' predictions and the measured values in the field, but additional data are needed to confirm these initial results. Our study suggests that scaling models in the bee risk assessment could complement existing risk assessment approaches and facilitate the further development of accurate risk characterization for solitary bees; ultimately the models will help to protect them during their foraging activity in agricultural settings. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:308-313. © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Pamminger
- BASF SELimburgerhofGermany
- Present address:
CropScience DivisionBayer AGMonheimGermany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pamminger T, Becker R, Himmelreich S, Schneider CW, Bergtold M. Pollen report: quantitative review of pollen crude protein concentrations offered by bee pollinated flowers in agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes. PeerJ 2019; 7:e7394. [PMID: 31423355 PMCID: PMC6694784 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
To ease nutritional stress on managed as well as native bee populations in agricultural habitats, agro-environmental protection schemes aim to provide alternative nutritional resources for bee populations during times of need. However, such efforts have so far focused on quantity (supply of flowering plants) and timing (flower-scarce periods) while ignoring the quality of the two main bee relevant flower-derived resources (pollen and nectar). As a first step to address this issue we have compiled one geographically explicit dataset focusing on pollen crude protein concentration, one measurement traditionally associated with pollen quality for bees. We attempt to provide a robust baseline for protein levels bees can collect in- (crop and weed species) and off-field (wild plants) in agricultural habitats around the globe. Using this dataset we identify crops which provide sub-optimal pollen resources in terms of crude protein concentration for bees and suggest potential plant genera that could serve as alternative resources for protein. This information could be used by scientists, regulators, bee keepers, NGOs and farmers to compare the pollen quality currently offered in alternative foraging habitats and identify opportunities to improve them. In the long run, we hope that additional markers of pollen quality will be added to the database in order to get a more complete picture of flower resources offered to bees and foster a data-informed discussion about pollinator conservation in modern agricultural landscapes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Roland Becker
- Global Ecotoxicology, BASF SE, Limburgerhof, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pamminger T, Becker R, Himmelreich S, Schneider CW, Bergtold M. The nectar report: quantitative review of nectar sugar concentrations offered by bee visited flowers in agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes. PeerJ 2019; 7:e6329. [PMID: 30834180 PMCID: PMC6397631 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
There is growing concern that some bee populations are in decline, potentially threatening pollination security in agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes. Among the numerous causes associated with this trend, nutritional stress resulting from a mismatch between bee nutritional needs and plant community provisioning has been suggested as one potential driver. To ease nutritional stress on bee populations in agricultural habitats, agri-environmental protection schemes aim to provide alternative nutritional resources for bee populations during times of need. However, such efforts have focused mainly on quantity (providing flowering plants) and timing (during flower-scarce periods), while largely ignoring the quality of the offered flower resources. In a first step to start addressing this information gap, we have used literature data to compile a comprehensive geographically explicit dataset on nectar quality (i.e., total sugar concentration), offered to bees both within fields (crop and weed species) as well as outside fields (wild species) around the globe. Social bees are particularly sensitive to nectar sugar concentrations, which directly impact calorie influx into the colony and consequently their fitness making it an important resource quality marker. We find that the total nectar sugar concentrations in general do not differ between the three plant communities studied. In contrast we find increased variability in nectar quality in the wild plant community compared to crop and weed community, which is likely explained by the increased phylogenetic diversity in this category of plants. In a second step we explore the influence of local habitat on nectar quality and its variability utilizing a detailed sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) data set and find that geography has a small, but significant influence on these parameters. In a third step we identify crop groups (genera), which provide sub-optimal nectar resources for bees and suggest high quality alternatives as potential nectar supplements. In the long term this data set could serve as a starting point to systematically collect more quality characteristics of plant provided resources to bees, which ultimately can be utilized by scientist, regulators, NGOs and farmers to improve the flower resources offered to bees. We hope that ultimately this data will help to ease nutritional stress for bee populations and foster a data informed discussion about pollinator conservation in modern agricultural landscapes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Roland Becker
- Global Ecotoxicology, BASF SE, Limburgerhof, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Christl H, Bendall J, Bergtold M, Coulson M, Dinter A, Garlej B, Hammel K, Kabouw P, Sharples A, von Mérey G, Vrbka S, Ernst G. Recalibration of the earthworm tier 1 risk assessment of plant protection products. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2016; 12:643-650. [PMID: 26620775 DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2015] [Revised: 07/28/2015] [Accepted: 11/12/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
In the first step of earthworm risk assessment for plant protection products (PPPs), the risk is assessed by comparing the no-observed effect levels (NOELs) from laboratory reproduction tests with the predicted exposure of the PPP in soil, while applying a trigger value (assessment factor [AF]) to cover uncertainties. If this step indicates a potential risk, field studies are conducted. However, the predicted environmental concentration in soil, which can be calculated, for example, for different soil layers (ranging from 0-1 cm to 0-20 cm), and the AF determine the conservatism that is applied in this first step. In this review paper, the tier 1 earthworm risk assessment for PPPs is calibrated by comparing the NOEL in earthworm reproduction tests with effect levels on earthworm populations under realistic field conditions. A data set of 54 pairs of studies conducted in the laboratory and in the field with the same PPP was compiled, allowing a direct comparison of relevant endpoints. The results indicate that a tier 1 AF of 5 combined with a regulatory relevant soil layer of 0 to 5 cm provides a conservative tier 1 risk assessment. A risk was identified by the tier 1 risk assessment in the majority of the cases at application rates that were of low risk for natural earthworm populations under field conditions. Increasing the conservatism in the tier 1 risk assessment by reducing the depth of the regulatory relevant soil layer or by increasing the tier 1 AF would increase the number of false positives and trigger a large number of additional field studies. This increased conservatism, however, would not increase the margin of safety for earthworm populations. The analysis revealed that the risk assessment is conservative if an AF of 5 and a regulatory relevant soil layer of 0 to 5 cm is used. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2016;12:643-650. © 2015 SETAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julie Bendall
- Dow AgroSciences, Milton Park, Abingdon, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mike Coulson
- Syngenta Crop Protection, Bracknell, United Kingdom
| | - Axel Dinter
- DuPont de Nemours Deutschland (GmbH), Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Höss S, Ahlf W, Bergtold M, Bluebaum-Gronau E, Brinke M, Donnevert G, Menzel R, Möhlenkamp C, Ratte HT, Traunspurger W, von Danwitz B, Pluta HJ. Interlaboratory comparison of a standardized toxicity test using the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (ISO 10872). Environ Toxicol Chem 2012; 31:1525-1535. [PMID: 22544597 DOI: 10.1002/etc.1843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2011] [Revised: 01/20/2012] [Accepted: 02/09/2012] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
A ring test was carried out within the standardization process of ISO 10872 to evaluate the precision of the toxicity test for the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Eight different laboratories tested aqueous solutions of the reference substance benzylcetyldimethylammonium chloride as well as native sediments and soils for toxic effects on the growth and reproduction of C. elegans. Validity criteria were met in all laboratories. Average median- and low-effect concentrations were determined to be 15.1 mg L(-1) (EC50) and 8.7 mg L(-1) (EC10) for growth and 7.5 mg L(-1) (EC50) and 3.8 mg L(-1) (EC10) for reproduction of C. elegans, with ECx values showing a high degree of reproducibility (CV(R) : <21% and <11% for EC10 and EC50, respectively) and repeatability (CV(r) : <20% and <7% for EC10 and EC50, respectively). The toxic effects of the sediments and soils revealed by the different laboratories were well related to each samples' degree of chemical contamination. Moreover, the effects showed an acceptable reproducibility (CV(R) : 5-33% and 0-28% for growth and reproduction, respectively) and repeatability (CV(r) : 3-13% and 0-12% for growth and reproduction, respectively). The present study confirms that the toxicity test with C. elegans according to ISO 10872 is a reliable and precise tool to assess the toxicity of aqueous media, freshwater sediments, and soils.
Collapse
|
8
|
Bergtold M, Dohmen GP. Biomass or growth rate endpoint for algae and aquatic plants: relevance for the aquatic risk assessment of herbicides. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2011; 7:237-247. [PMID: 20836059 DOI: 10.1002/ieam.136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2009] [Revised: 12/29/2009] [Accepted: 07/07/2010] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
Ecotoxicological studies with algae and aquatic plants are essential parts of the aquatic risk assessment for crop protection products (CPP). Growth rate is used as a response variable and in addition the effects on biomass and/or yield (in the following biomass) can be measured. The parameter biomass generally provides a lower numerical value compared with the growth rate for systematic and mathematical reasons. Therefore, some regulators prefer to use the EbC50 value (i.e., the concentration at which 50% reduction of biomass is observed) rather than ErC50 (the concentration at which a 50% inhibition of growth rate is observed) as the endpoint for ecotoxicological risk assessment. However, the parameter growth rate is scientifically more appropriate and robust against deviations in test conditions, permitting better interpretation of, and comparison between, studies. The aim of the present work is to evaluate the growth rate and biomass parameters with regard to their protectiveness and suitability for environmental risk assessment of CPP. It has been shown for a number of herbicides that the use of the EC50 value (without distinction between growth rate and biomass endpoints) from laboratory studies in combination with an assessment factor of 10 is sufficiently protective for aquatic plants (except for the herbicide 2,4-D). In this paper we evaluated EbC50 and ErC50 values separately. Data on 19 different herbicides were compiled from the literature or GLP reports. The EbC50 and ErC50 values obtained in laboratory studies were compared with effect concentrations in ecosystem studies (mainly mesocosm). This comparison of laboratory and field data shows that the overall aquatic risk assessment using ErC50 values in combination with the currently applied assessment factor of 10 is sufficient to exclude significant risk to aquatic plants in the environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Bergtold
- BASF SE, Ecotoxicology APD/EE, Carl Bosch Strasse 64, 67117 Limburgerhof, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Brinke M, Ristau K, Bergtold M, Höss S, Claus E, Heininger P, Traunspurger W. Using meiofauna to assess pollutants in freshwater sediments: a microcosm study with cadmium. Environ Toxicol Chem 2011; 30:427-438. [PMID: 21038433 DOI: 10.1002/etc.387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
The direct and indirect effects of Cd on benthic communities were assessed in a freshwater microcosm study over a period of seven months (218 d). Cadmium was regarded as a model substance to evaluate the usefulness of small-scale laboratory microcosm with microscopic fauna. In particular, effects on the meiofauna community, an ecologically important but rather neglected benthic component, were investigated. In addition, some microfaunal parameters (protozoan abundance and microbial activity) were determined. The sediment was spiked with nominal Cd concentrations of 10, 100, and 1,000 mg/kg dry weight. Because of the strong binding of Cd to sediment particles, measured Cd pore-water concentrations never exceeded 129.5 ± 40.7 µg/L. At 1,000 mg/kg dry weight, the abundances of the two dominant meiofauna taxa, nematodes and oligochaetes, were significantly reduced throughout the present study. Regarding nematodes, species of bacterivorous taxa (Daptonema, Eumonhystera) decreased, whereas species of predacious and omnivorous taxa (Mononchus, Dorylaimus, and Ironus) increased in dominance in microcosms of the highest Cd concentration. Transient effects on microfauna were observed, especially in the first half of the present study, with a reduction in microbial activity and protozoan abundance. However, in microcosms receiving the highest Cd concentration, the abundance of the flagellate Euglena mutabilis increased significantly toward the end of the present study. The results of the present study support the use of small-scale microcosms with natural meiofauna communities as a suitable tool to assess the impact of pollutants in freshwater sediments.
Collapse
|
10
|
Bergtold M, Mayr G, Traunspurger W. Nematodes in wastewater biofilms--appearance and density of species in three biofilter reactors. Water Res 2007; 41:145-51. [PMID: 17098276 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2005] [Revised: 08/06/2006] [Accepted: 09/20/2006] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Population dynamics of nematode species in biofilms of three different biofilter reactors, differing in size (pilot/laboratory scale), operation mode and biofilm carrier, were studied over a period of 1 year. In the biofilm suspension of the pilot system mean nematode density was 118individuals/ml and average biomass 15microg wet weight/ml. Higher mean abundance was found in the two laboratory systems with 2380 and 4411individuals/ml. Mean biomass in the laboratory systems ranged from 209 to 330microg wet weight/ml. There were marked temporal differences in appearance and density of nematode species in all three biofilters. Number of species observed was 3 in the laboratory systems and 5 in the pilot system. The fastest growing species (Paroigolaimella bernensis and Diplogasteritus nudicapitatus) were observed in the pilot reactor in contrast to the more slowly growing species (Diploscapter coronatus and Acrostichus sp.), which dominated in the laboratory reactors. Sexual reproduction was found for all species but of Diploscapter coronatus. When comparing life history traits of the different species with the environmental conditions in the reactors, it seems that the unstable conditions in the pilot reactor favor the fast growing species whereas the stable environment in the laboratory systems allows the growth of species with longer generation times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bergtold
- University of Bielefeld, Animal Ecology, Morgenbreede 45, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bergtold M, Traunspurger W. Benthic production by micro-, meio-, and macrobenthos in the profundal zone of an oligotrophic lake. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2005. [DOI: 10.1899/03-038.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
12
|
|