Health Equity Achievement in Radiation Therapy (HEART) Score: A Social Prognosis

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The aim of this study was to develop a Health Equity Achievement in Radiation Therapy (HEART) score that can help identify patients at risk of experiencing suboptimal quality-of-care (QoC) early on in the patient-provider encounter and prior to initiation of treatment. Such a score may improve shared decision making to improve QoC.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for prostate cancer cases between 2004-2017. Sociodemographic factors, clinical characteristics, and treatment information were collected. A composite HEART score was built to predict suboptimal QoC, defined as treatment refusal, incomplete treatment, or treatment delay. 70% of the data was allocated to training and 30% to validating a logistic regression model through which a nomogram was constructed.

RESULTS

A total of 1,599,785 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 126,917 (7.9%) had at least one suboptimal QoC. The strongest predictors were Black race, uninsured status, lower educational status, geographic location, and nodal disease (Table). The nomogram demonstrated a fair ability to predict quality metrics, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.57 in the test group. The nomogram facilitated graphic interpretation of systemic factors in contributing to suboptimal QoC.

CONCLUSION

With observed potential for predicting suboptimal QoC outcomes in patients with prostate cancer by considering systemic barriers, this NCDB-based nomogram has potential utility as a tool for identifying patients who may benefit from additional social support, including the financial resources associated with these services, to improve access to care. Further validation in diverse datasets is needed to improve performance and generalizability to broader patient populations and different disease sites.

Observer preference of artificial intelligence-generated versus clinical prostate contours for ultrasound-based high dose rate brachytherapy

BACKGROUND

For trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS)-based high dose rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy, prostate contouring can be challenging due to artifacts from implanted needles, bleeding, and calcifications.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the geometric accuracy and observer preference of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for generating prostate contours on TRUS images with implanted needles.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 150 patients, who underwent HDR brachytherapy. These patients were randomly divided into training (104), validation (26) and testing (20) sets. An AI algorithm was trained/validated utilizing the TRUS image and reference (clinical) contours. The algorithm then provided contours for the test set. For evaluation, we calculated the Dice coefficient between AI and reference prostate contours. We then presented AI and reference contours to eight clinician observers, and asked observers to select their preference. Observers were blinded to the source of contours. We calculated the percentage of cases in which observers preferred AI contours. Lastly, we evaluate whether the presence of AI contours improved the geometric accuracy of prostate contours provided by five resident observers for a 10-patient subset.

RESULTS

The median Dice coefficient between AI and reference contours was 0.92 (IQR: 0.90-0.94). Observers preferred AI contours for a median of 57.5% (IQR: 47.5, 65.0) of the test cases. For resident observers, the presence of AI contours was associated with a 0.107 (95% CI: 0.086, 0.128; p < 0.001) improvement in Dice coefficient for the 10-patient subset.

CONCLUSION

The AI algorithm provided high-quality prostate contours on TRUS with implanted needles. Further prospective study is needed to better understand how to incorporate AI prostate contours into the TRUS-based HDR brachytherapy workflow.

Determinants of Commercial Prices for Common Radiation Therapy Procedures

PURPOSE

Using hospital-reported price data, we analyzed whether various market factors including radiation oncology practice consolidation were associated with higher commercial prices for radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We evaluated commercial prices paid by private insurers for 4 common RT procedures-intensity modulated RT (IMRT) planning, IMRT delivery, 3-dimensional RT (3D-RT) planning, and 3D-RT delivery-reported among the 2096 hospitals in the United States that deliver RT according to the Medicare Provider of Service file. To assess price variation within hospitals, we evaluated the ratio of the 90th percentile price to the 10th percentile price among different private insurers. To assess regional variation, we similarly compared median commercial prices at the 90th and 10th percentile hospitals in each Hospital Referral Region. We generated multivariable models to test the association of various hospital, health system, regional, and market factors on median hospital commercial prices.

RESULTS

A total of 1004 hospitals (47.9%) reported at least 1 commercial price for any of the 4 RT procedures considered in this study. National median commercial prices for IMRT planning and IMRT delivery were $4073 (interquartile ratio [IQR], $2242-$6305) and $1666 (IQR, $1014-$2619), respectively. Prices for 3D-RT planning and 3D-RT delivery were $2824 (IQR, $1339-$4738) and $616 (IQR, $419-877), respectively. Within hospitals, the 90th percentile price paid by a private insurer was 2.3 to 2.5 times higher on average than the 10th percentile price, depending on the procedure. Within each Hospital Referral Region, the median price at the 90th percentile hospital was between 2.4 and 3.2 times higher than at the 10th percentile hospital. On multivariable analysis, higher prices were generally observed at hospitals with for-profit ownership, teaching status, and affiliation with large health systems. Levels of radiation oncology practice consolidation were not significantly associated with any prices.

CONCLUSIONS

Commercial prices for common RT procedures vary by more than a factor of 2 depending on a patient's private insurer and hospital of choice. Higher prices were more likely to be found at for-profit hospitals, teaching hospitals, and hospitals affiliated with large health systems.

Characterization of clinical outcomes after shorter course hypofractionated and standard-course radiotherapy for stage I-III curatively-treated Merkel cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Limited data exists regarding the efficacy of curative hypofractionated radiotherapy (hypo-RT) regimens compared to conventionally-fractionated radiotherapy (conv-RT) for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 241 patients diagnosed with non-metastatic MCC from 2005-2021 and who received RT at Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center. The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of in-field locoregional relapse using Gray's test with competing risks of death and isolated out-of-field recurrence. Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and MCC-specific survival using log-rank tests, and risk factors of recurrence using Cox-proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

There were 50 (20.6%) and 193 (79.4%) courses of hypo-RT and conv-RT, respectively. The hypo-RT cohort was older (≥73 years at diagnosis: 78.0% vs. 41.5%, p<0.01), and received a lower equivalent total RT dose in 2 Gy per fraction (<50 Gy: 58.0% vs. 5.2%, p<0.01). Median follow-up was 65.1 months (range: 1.2-194.5) for conv-RT and 25.0 months (range: 1.6-131.3) for hypo-RT cohorts. Two-year cumulative incidence of in-field locoregional relapse was low in both groups (1.1% conv-RT vs. 4.1% hypo-RT, p=0.114). While two-year OS was lower for the hypo-RT group (62.6% vs. 84.4%, p=0.0008), two-year MCC-specific survival was similar (84.7 vs. 86.6%, p=0.743). On multivariable analysis, immunosuppression, clinical stage III disease, and lymphovascular invasion were associated with any-recurrence when controlling for sex, age, and hypo-RT.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

There was no difference in cumulative incidence of in-field locoregional relapse or MCC-specific survival between hypo-RT and conv-RT. Prospective studies are needed to confirm hypo-RT as an efficacious treatment option for MCC.

Incidence of Radiation Therapy Among Patients Enrolled in a Multidisciplinary Pulmonary Nodule and Lung Cancer Screening Clinic

IMPORTANCE

The number of pulmonary nodules discovered incidentally or through screening programs has increased markedly. Multidisciplinary review and management are recommended, but the involvement of radiation oncologists in this context has not been defined.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy among patients enrolled in a lung cancer screening program.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This prospective cohort study was performed at a pulmonary nodule and lung cancer screening clinic from October 1, 2012, to September 31, 2019. Referrals were based on chest computed tomography with Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 finding or an incidental nodule 6 mm or larger. A multidisciplinary team of practitioners from radiology, thoracic surgery, pulmonology, medical oncology, and radiation oncology reviewed all nodules and coordinated workup and treatment as indicated.

EXPOSURES

Patients referred to the pulmonary nodule and lung cancer screening clinic with an incidental or screen-detected pulmonary nodule.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the proportion of patients undergoing therapeutic intervention with radiation therapy, stratified by the route of detection of their pulmonary nodules (incidental vs screen detected). Secondary outcomes were 2-year local control and metastasis-free survival.

RESULTS

Among 1150 total patients (median [IQR] age, 66.5 [59.3-73.7] years; 665 [57.8%] female; 1024 [89.0%] non-Hispanic White; 841 [73.1%] current or former smokers), 234 (20.3%) presented with screen-detected nodules and 916 (79.7%) with incidental nodules. For patients with screen-detected nodules requiring treatment, 41 (17.5%) received treatment, with 31 (75.6%) undergoing surgery and 10 (24.4%) receiving radiation therapy. Patients treated with radiation therapy were older (median [IQR] age, 73.8 [67.1 to 82.1] vs 67.6 [61.0 to 72.9] years; P < .001) and more likely to have history of tobacco use (67 [95.7%] vs 128 [76.6%]; P = .001) than those treated with surgery. Fifty-eight patients treated with radiation therapy (82.9%) were considered high risk for biopsy, and treatment recommendations were based on a clinical diagnosis of lung cancer after multidisciplinary review. All screened patients who received radiation therapy had stage I disease and were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. For all patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy, 2-year local control was 96.3% (95% CI, 91.1%-100%) and metastasis-free survival was 94.2% (95% CI, 87.7%-100%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this unique prospective cohort, 1 in 4 patients with screen-detected pulmonary nodules requiring intervention were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. This finding highlights the role of radiation therapy in a lung cancer screening population and the importance of including radiation oncologists in the multidisciplinary management of pulmonary nodules.

Target coverage and cardiopulmonary sparing with the updated ESTRO-ACROP contouring guidelines for postmastectomy radiation therapy after breast reconstruction: a treatment planning study using VMAT and proton PBS techniques

BACKGROUND

The European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice (ESTRO-ACROP) recently released new contouring guidelines for postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) after implant-based reconstruction (IBR). As compared to prior ESTRO guidelines, the new guidelines primarily redefined the chest wall (CW) target to exclude the breast prosthesis. In this study, we assessed the impact of these changes on treatment planning and dosimetric outcomes using volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and proton pencil-beam scanning (PBS) therapy.

METHODS

We performed a treatment planning study of 10 women with left-sided breast cancer who underwent PMRT after IBR. All target structures were delineated first using standard (ESTRO) breast contouring guidelines and then separately using the new (ESTRO-ACROP) guidelines. Standard organs-at-risk (OARs) and cardiac substructures were contoured. Four sets of plans were generated: (1) VMAT using standard ESTRO contours, (2) VMAT using new ESTRO-ACROP contours, (3) PBS using standard contours, and (4) PBS using new contours.

RESULTS

VMAT plans using the new ESTRO-ACROP guidelines resulted in modest sparing of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (mean dose: 6.99 Gy standard ESTRO vs. 6.08 Gy new ESTRO-ACROP, p = 0.010) and ipsilateral lung (V₂₀: 21.66% vs 19.45%, p = 0.017), but similar exposure to the heart (mean dose: 4.6 Gy vs. 4.3 Gy, p = 0.513), with a trend toward higher contralateral lung (V₅: 31.0% vs 35.3%, p = 0.331) and CW doses (V₅: 31.9% vs 35.4%, p = 0.599). PBS plans using the new guidelines resulted in further sparing of the heart (mean dose: 1.05 Gy(RBE) vs. 0.54 Gy(RBE), p < 0.001), nearly all cardiac substructures (LAD mean dose: 2.01 Gy(RBE) vs. 0.66 Gy(RBE), p < 0.001), and ipsilateral lung (V₂₀: 16.22% vs 6.02%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PMRT after IBR using the new ESTRO-ACROP contouring guidelines with both VMAT and PBS therapy is associated with significant changes in exposure to several cardiopulmonary structures.

Harnessing Lactate Metabolism for Radiosensitization

Cancer cells rewire their metabolism to promote cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. Alterations in the lactate pathway have been characterized in diverse cancers, correlate with outcomes, and lead to many downstream effects, including decreasing oxidative stress, promoting an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, lipid synthesis, and building chemo- or radio-resistance. Radiotherapy is a key modality of treatment for many cancers and approximately 50% of patients with cancer will receive radiation for cure or palliation; thus, overcoming radio-resistance is important for improving outcomes. Growing research suggests that important molecular controls of the lactate pathway may serve as novel therapeutic targets and in particular, radiosensitizers. In this mini-review, we will provide an overview of lactate metabolism in cancer, discuss three important contributors to lactate metabolism (lactate dehydrogenase, monocarboxylate transporters, and mitochondrial pyruvate carrier), and present data that inhibition of these three pathways can lead to radiosensitization. Future research is needed to further understand critical regulators of lactate metabolism and explore clinical safety and efficacy of inhibitors of lactate dehydrogenase, monocarboxylate transporters, and mitochondrial pyruvate carrier alone and in combination with radiation.

Overuse of Diagnostic Brain Imaging Among Patients With Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Among patients diagnosed with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the incidence of occult brain metastasis is low, and several professional societies recommend against brain imaging for staging purposes. The goal of this study was to characterize the use of brain imaging among Medicare patients diagnosed with stage IA NSCLC.

METHODS

Using data from linked SEER-Medicare claims, we identified patients diagnosed with AJCC 8th edition stage IA NSCLC in 2004 through 2013. Patients were classified as having received brain imaging if they underwent head CT or brain MRI from 1 month before to 3 months after diagnosis. We identified factors associated with receipt of brain imaging using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 13,809 patients with stage IA NSCLC, 3,417 (25%) underwent brain imaging at time of diagnosis. The rate of brain imaging increased over time, from 23.5% in 2004 to 28.7% in 2013 (P=.0006). There was significant variation in the use of brain imaging across hospital service areas, with rates ranging from 0% to 64.0%. Factors associated with a greater likelihood of brain imaging included older age (odds ratios [ORs] of 1.16 for 70-74 years, 1.13 for 75-79 years, 1.31 for 80-84 years, and 1.46 for ≥85 years compared with 65-69 years; all P<.05), female sex (OR, 1.09; P<.05), black race (OR 1.23; P<.05), larger tumor size (ORs of 1.23 for 11-20 mm and 1.28 for 21-30 mm tumors vs 1-10 mm tumors; all P<.05), and higher modified Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score (OR, 1.28 for score >1 vs score of 0; P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Roughly 1 in 4 patients with stage IA NSCLC received brain imaging at the time of diagnosis despite national recommendations against the practice. Although several patient factors are associated with receipt of brain imaging, there is significant geographic variation across the United States. Closer adherence to clinical guidelines is likely to result in more cost-effective care.

Treating the SARS-CoV-2-positive patient with cancer: A proposal for a pragmatic and transparent ethical process

The treatment of patients with cancer who test positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) poses unique challenges. In this commentary, the authors describe the ethical rationale and implementation details for the creation of a novel, multidisciplinary treatment prioritization committee, including physicians, frontline staff, an ethicist, and an infectious disease expert. Organizational obligations to health care workers also are discussed. The treatment prioritization committee sets a threshold of acceptable harm to patients from decreased cancer control that is justified to reduce risk to staff. The creation of an ethical, consistent, and transparent decision‐making process involving such frontline stakeholders is essential as departments across the country are faced with decisions regarding the treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2–positive patients with cancer.

This commentary describes the ethical rationale and implementation details for a novel, multidisciplinary, treatment prioritization committee that makes treatment decisions regarding patients with cancer who are positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2). This consistent, ethical, and transparent process could be adapted to any oncology department in which there is risk disparity between physician decision makers and the frontline staff who are implementing these decisions.

Impact of HIV Infection on the Clinical Presentation and Survival of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Prospective Observational Study From Botswana

PURPOSE

Botswana has a high prevalence of HIV infection. Currently, there are few data regarding the sociodemographic factors, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)-an AIDS-defining cancer-in the country.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study used a prospective cancer registry to identify patients with a new diagnosis of NHL reporting for specialty cancer care at three hospitals in Botswana between October 2010 and August 2016. Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred four patients with a new diagnosis of NHL were enrolled in this study, 72% of whom had HIV infection. Compared with patients not infected with HIV, patients infected with HIV were younger (median age, 53.9 v 39.1 years; P = .001) and more likely to present with an aggressive subtype of NHL (65.5% v 84.0%; P = .008). All patients infected with HIV received combined antiretroviral therapy throughout the course of the study, and similar chemotherapeutic regimens were recommended for all patients, regardless of subtype or HIV status (six to eight cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone plus rituximab). There was no difference in 1-year mortality among patients not infected with HIV and patients infected with HIV (unadjusted analysis, 52.9% v 37.1%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; P = .33; adjusted analysis, HR, 0.57; P = .14). However, when compared with a cohort of patients in the United States matched by subtype, stage, age, sex, and race, patients in Botswana fared worse (1-year mortality, 22.8% v 46.3%; HR, 1.89; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with NHL reporting for specialty cancer care in Botswana, there is no association between HIV status and 1-year survival.