Effect of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Treatment Upon Erectile Function in Hypertensive Men: Findings From the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial

INTRODUCTION

The effect of intensive blood pressure control upon erectile function in men with hypertension, but without diabetes, is largely unknown.

AIM

To examine the effects of intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering on erectile function in a multiethnic clinical trial of men with hypertension.

METHODS

We performed subgroup analyses from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial ([SPRINT]; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT120602, in a sample of 1255 men aged 50 years or older with hypertension and increased cardiovascular disease risk. Participants were randomly assigned to an intensive treatment group (SBP goal of <120 mmHg) or a standard treatment group (SBP goal of <140 mmHg).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The main outcome measure was change in erectile function from baseline, using the 5-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) total score, and erectile dysfunction ([ED]; defined as IIEF-5 score ≤21) after a median follow-up of 3 years.

RESULTS

At baseline, roughly two-thirds (66.1%) of the sample had self-reported ED. At 48 months after randomization, we determined that the effects of more intensive blood pressure lowering were significantly moderated by race-ethnicity (p for interaction = 0.0016), prompting separate analyses stratified by race-ethnicity. In non-Hispanic whites, participants in the intensive treatment group reported slightly, but significantly better change in the IIEF-5 score than those in the standard treatment group (mean difference = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.03, 1.32; P = 0.041). In non-Hispanic blacks, participants in the intensive group reported slightly worse change in the IIEF-5 score than those in the standard group (mean difference = -1.17; 95% CI = -1.92, -0.41; P = 0.0025). However, in non-Hispanic whites and non-Hispanic blacks, further adjustment for the baseline IIEF-5 score resulted in nonsignificant differences (P > 0.05) according to the treatment group. In Hispanic/other participants, there were no significant differences in change in the IIEF-5 score between the two treatment groups (P = 0.40). In a subgroup of 280 participants who did not report ED at baseline, the incidence of ED did not differ in the two treatment groups (P = 0.53) and was without interaction by race-ethnicity.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The effect of intensive treatment of blood pressure on erectile function was very small overall and likely not of great clinical magnitude.

STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS

Although this study included a validated measure of erectile function, testosterone, other androgen, and estrogen levels were not assessed.

CONCLUSION

In a sample of male patients at high risk for cardiovascular events but without diabetes, targeting a SBP of less than 120 mm Hg, as compared with less than 140 mm Hg, resulted in statistically significant effects on erectile function that differed in accordance with race-ethnicity, although the clinical importance of the differences may be of small magnitude. Foy CG, Newman JC, Russell GB, et al. Effect of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Treatment Upon Erectile Function in Hypertensive Men: Findings From the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial. J Sex Med 2020;17:238-248.

C5a and TNF-alpha up-regulate the expression of tissue factor in intra-alveolar neutrophils of patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by the presence of fibrin-rich inflammatory exudates in the intra-alveolar spaces and the extensive migration of neutrophils into alveoli of the lungs. Tissue factor (TF)-dependent procoagulant properties of bronchoalveaolar lavage fluid (BALF) obtained from ARDS patients favor fibrin deposition, and are likely the result of cross-talk between inflammatory mediators and hemostatic mechanisms. However, the regulation of these interactions remains elusive. Prompted by previous findings suggesting that neutrophils, under certain inflammatory conditions, can express functional TF, we investigated the contribution of intra-alveolar neutrophils to the procoagulant properties of BALF from patients with ARDS. Our results confirm that the procoagulant properties of BALF from ARDS patients are the result of TF induction, and further indicate that BALF neutrophils are a main source of TF in intra-alveolar fluid. We also found that BALF neutrophils in these patients express significantly higher levels of TF than peripheral blood neutrophils. These results suggest that the alveolar microenvironment contributes to TF induction in ARDS. Additional experiments indicated that the ability of BALF to induce TF expression in neutrophils from healthy donors can be abolished by inhibiting C5a or TNF-alpha signaling, suggesting a primary role for these inflammatory mediators in the up-regulation of TF in alveolar neutrophils in ARDS. This cross-talk between inflammatory mediators and the induction of TF expression in intra-alveolar neutrophils may be a potential target for novel therapeutic strategies to limit ARDS-associated disturbances of coagulation.

Different Effects of Losartan and Moxonidine on Endothelial Function During Sympathetic Activation in Essential Hypertension

The aim of this study was to investigate: 1) the effects of treadmill exercise on plasma catecholamines and endothelin-1 (ET-1, a potent vasoconstrictor) levels in hypertensive patients; and 2) the impact of 1-month therapy with losartan as compared with moxonidine on catecholamine and ET-1 changes during exercise. Twenty-eight patients with essential hypertension were randomized in two groups: group A received losartan and group B received moxonidine for 1 month. Plasma catecholamines exhibited an almost 10-fold increase during exercise (p<0.00001) before treatment. Moxonidine significantly decreased catecholamine levels (p<0.05), while losartan reduction was nonsignificant (p<0.36). Plasma ET-1 increased significantly during exercise before treatment (p<0.00005). Moxonidine therapy did not affect ET-1 levels (p<0.88), while losartan resulted in a significant decrease of ET-1 levels both at baseline and during exercise (p<0.007). These findings suggest a mechanism for the reduced cardiovascular mortality noted with an angiotensin receptor blocker as compared with a sympatholytic agent.