1
|
Lewiecki EM, Bellido T, Bilezikian JP, Brown JP, Farooki A, Kovacs CS, Lee B, Leslie WD, McClung MR, Prasarn ML, Sellmeyer DE. Proceedings of the 2023 Santa Fe Bone Symposium: Progress and Controversies in the Management of Patients with Skeletal Diseases. J Clin Densitom 2023; 26:101432. [PMID: 37944445 PMCID: PMC10900844 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
The Santa Fe Bone Symposium (SFBS) held its 23rd annual event on August 5-6, 2023, in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA. Attendees participated in-person and remotely, representing many states and countries. The program included plenary presentations, panel discussions, satellite symposia, a Project ECHO workshop, and a session on healthcare policy and reimbursement for fracture liaison programs. A broad range of topics were addressed, including transitions of osteoporosis treatments over a lifetime; controversies in vitamin D; update on Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry; spine surgery and bone health; clinical applications of bone turnover markers; basic bone biology for clinicians; premenopausal-, pregnancy-, and lactation-associated osteoporosis; cancer treatment induced bone loss in patients with breast cancer and prostate cancer; genetic testing for skeletal diseases; and an update on nutrition and bone health. There were also sessions on rare bone diseases, including managing patients with hypophosphatasia; treatment of X-linked hypophosphatemia; and assessment and treatment of patients with hypoparathyroidism. There were oral presentations of abstracts by endocrinology fellows selected from those who participated in the Santa Fe Fellows Workshop on Metabolic Bone Diseases, held the 2 days prior to the SFBS. These proceedings of the 2023 SFBS present the clinical highlights and insights generated from many formal and informal discussions in Santa Fe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Michael Lewiecki
- New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
| | - Teresita Bellido
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - John P Bilezikian
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Azeez Farooki
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States; Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Christopher S Kovacs
- Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Brendan Lee
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
McClung MR, Betah D, Deignan C, Shi Y, Timoshanko J, Cosman F. Romosozumab Efficacy in Postmenopausal Women With No Prior Fracture Who Fulfill Criteria for Very High Fracture Risk. Endocr Pract 2023; 29:716-722. [PMID: 37406858 DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2023.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We evaluated the efficacy of romosozumab in women from FRAME who had no prior fracture but met other criteria for very high fracture risk (VHFR). METHODS In FRAME, postmenopausal women received romosozumab or placebo for 12 months (year 1) followed by denosumab for 12 months (year 2). In this post hoc analysis, we applied the following criteria from the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology to define VHFR: lumbar spine or total hip T-score <-3.0 and/or Fracture Risk Assessment Tool probability of major osteoporotic fracture >30% or hip fracture >4.5% to women with no fracture history at baseline (no fracture-VHFR [NF-VHFR]). Incidence of new vertebral, clinical, and nonvertebral fractures and mean bone mineral density (BMD) percentage change from baseline were assessed at years 1 and 2. RESULTS Of the 7180 women in FRAME, 2825 were included in the NF-VHFR subgroup analysis. At year 1, romosozumab versus placebo reduced the incidence of new vertebral fracture (relative risk reduction [RRR]: 76%), clinical fracture (RRR: 60%), and nonvertebral fracture (RRR: 54%) (all P <.05). This fracture reduction was maintained through year 2 in women receiving the romosozumab-to-denosumab sequence versus the placebo-to-denosumab sequence for new vertebral, clinical, and nonvertebral fractures (RRR: 77%, 54%, and 46%, respectively; all P <.05). The mean BMD changes in both treatment groups were similar to those in the overall FRAME population at years 1 and 2. CONCLUSION Romosozumab significantly reduced vertebral, clinical, and nonvertebral fracture risk and increased the BMD more than placebo in women at VHFR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, Oregon; Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | | | | | - Yifei Shi
- Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California
| | | | - Felicia Cosman
- Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Singer A, McClung MR, Tran O, Morrow CD, Goldstein S, Kagan R, McDermott M, Yehoshua A. Treatment rates and healthcare costs of patients with fragility fracture by site of care: a real-world data analysis. Arch Osteoporos 2023; 18:42. [PMID: 36905559 PMCID: PMC10008255 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-023-01229-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
In a characterization of treatment rates and healthcare costs among patients with an osteoporotic-related fragility fracture overall and by site of care, costs were high and treatment rates were low. PURPOSE Osteoporotic fractures can be debilitating, even fatal, among older adults. The cost of osteoporosis and related fractures is projected to increase to more than $25 billion by 2025. The objective of this analysis is to characterize disease-related treatment rates and healthcare costs of patients with an osteoporotic fragility fracture overall and by site of fracture diagnosis. METHODS In this retrospective analysis, individuals with fragility fractures were identified in the Merative MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Databases among women 50 years of age or older and diagnosed with fragility fracture between 1/1/2013 and 6/30/2018 (earliest fracture diagnosis = index). Cohorts were categorized by clinical site of care where the diagnosis of fragility fracture was made and were continuously followed for 12 months prior to and following index. Sites of care were inpatient admission, outpatient office, outpatient hospital, emergency room hospital, and urgent care. RESULTS Of the 108,965 eligible patients with fragility fracture (mean age 68.8), most were diagnosed during an inpatient admission or outpatient office visit (42.7%, 31.9%). The mean annual healthcare costs among patients with fragility fracture were $44,311 (± $67,427) and were highest for those diagnosed in an inpatient setting ($71,561 ± $84,072). Compared with other sites of care at fracture diagnosis, patients diagnosed during an inpatient admission also had highest proportion of subsequent fractures (33.2%), osteoporosis diagnosis (27.7%), and osteoporosis therapy (17.2%) during follow-up. CONCLUSION The site of care for diagnosis of fragility fracture affects treatment rates and healthcare costs. Further studies are needed to determine how attitude or knowledge about osteoporosis treatment or healthcare experiences differ at various clinical sites of care in the medical management of osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Singer
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - M R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, USA
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - O Tran
- Merative, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - S Goldstein
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - R Kagan
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lewiecki EM, Bilezikian JP, Binkley N, Bouxsein ML, Bukata SV, Dempster DW, Drake MT, McClung MR, Miller PD, Rosenthal E, Tosi LL. Proceedings of the 2022 Santa Fe Bone Symposium: Current Concepts in the Care of Patients with Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases. J Clin Densitom 2022; 25:649-667. [PMID: 36280582 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2022.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The 22nd Annual Santa Fe Bone Symposium (SFBS) was a hybrid meeting held August 5-6, 2022, with in-person and virtual attendees. Altogether, over 400 individuals registered, a majority of whom attended in-person, representing many states in the USA plus 7 other countries. The SFBS included 10 plenary presentations, 2 faculty panel discussions, satellite symposia, Bone Health & Osteoporosis Foundation Fracture Liaison Service Boot Camp, and a Project ECHO workshop, with lively interactive discussions for all events. Topics of interest included fracture prevention at different stages of life; how to treat and when to change therapy; skeletal health in cancer patients; advanced imaging to assess bone strength; the state of healthcare in the USA; osteosarcopenia; vitamin D update; perioperative bone health care; new guidelines for managing primary hyperparathyroidism; new concepts on bone modeling and remodeling; and an overview on the care of rare bone diseases, including hypophosphatasia, X-linked hypophosphatemia, tumor induced osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfecta, fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva, and osteopetrosis. The SFBS was preceded by the Santa Fe Fellows Workshop on Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases, a collaboration of the Endocrine Fellows Foundation and the Osteoporosis Foundation of New Mexico. From the Workshop, 4 participating fellows were selected to give oral presentations at the bone symposium. These proceedings represent the clinical highlights of 2022 SFBS presentations and the discussions that followed, all with the aim of optimizing skeletal health and minimizing the consequences of fragile bones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Michael Lewiecki
- New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| | - John P Bilezikian
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Neil Binkley
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | | | - David W Dempster
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Michael R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, USA; Mary MacKillop Center for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Paul D Miller
- University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
McClung MR, Rothman MS, Lewiecki EM, Hanley DA, Harris ST, Miller PD, Kendler DL. The role of osteoanabolic agents in the management of patients with osteoporosis. Postgrad Med 2022; 134:541-551. [DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2022.2069582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R. McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR; Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Micol S. Rothman
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - David A. Hanley
- Departments of Medicine, Community Health Sciences, and Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine and McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, the University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Steven T. Harris
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - David L. Kendler
- Department of Medicine (Endocrinology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McClung MR, Kagan R, Graham S, Bernick B, Mirkin S, Constantine G. Effects of E2/P4 oral capsules on bone turnover in women with vasomotor symptoms. Menopause 2022; 29:304-308. [PMID: 35213517 PMCID: PMC8862769 DOI: 10.1097/gme.0000000000001915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate bone turnover markers (BTM) in the REPLENISH trial (NCT01942668). METHODS REPLENISH evaluated oral estradiol/progesterone (E2/P4) for the treatment of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) in postmenopausal women with a uterus. Eligible women for this analysis had ≥50 moderate to severe VMS/wk, were <5 years since last menstrual period, and had BTM measurements at baseline, and months 6 and 12. Percent changes for three BTM (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase [BSAP], C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen [CTX-1], and N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen [P1NP]) assessed by immunoassay methods were evaluated from baseline to months 6 and 12 for the 1 mg E2/100 mg P4, 0.5 mg E2/100 mg P4, and placebo groups. RESULTS A total of 157 women (40-61 y, 69% White) were analyzed. Mean baseline values ranged from 14.0 to 14.3 U/L for BSAP, 0.34 to 0.39 ng/mL for CTX-1, and 76.9 to 79.3 ng/mL for PINP. Mean differences in percent change from baseline for both E2/P4 doses versus placebo significantly decreased at months 6 and 12 and ranged from -8% to -16% for BSAP (all, P < 0.05), -30% to -41% for CTX-1 (all, P ≤ 0.001), and -14% to -29% for PINP (all, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS REPLENISH data provide support for a potential skeletal benefit of E2/P4 when it is used for the treatment of moderate to severe VMS. Further studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R. McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Risa Kagan
- University of California, San Francisco and Sutter East Bay Medical Foundation, Berkeley, CA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lewiecki EM, Anderson PA, Bilezikian JP, Binkley N, Cheung AM, Imel EA, Krueger D, McClung MR, Miller PD, Rothman MS. Proceedings of the 2021 Santa Fe Bone Symposium: Advances in the Management of Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases. J Clin Densitom 2022; 25:3-19. [PMID: 34785102 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2021.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The 2021 Virtual Santa Fe Bone Symposium was held August 5-8, with over 300 registered attendees from throughout the USA, and at least 18 other countries. This annual meeting focuses on applying advances in basic science and clinical research to the care of patients with osteoporosis and those with inherited and acquired disorders of bone metabolism. Participants represented a broad range of medical disciplines with an interest in skeletal diseases. These included physicians of many specialties and practice settings, fellows, advanced practice providers, fracture liaison service (FLS) coordinators, clinical researchers, and bone density technologists. There were lectures, case presentations, and panel discussions, all followed by interactive discussions. Breakout sessions included an FLS workshop, Bone Health TeleECHO workshop, special interest groups, meet-and-greet the faculty, and satellite symposia. The agenda covered topics of interest such as strategies for the use of osteoanabolic therapy, prevention of periprosthetic fractures, management of atypical femur fractures, what we know and don't know about vitamin D, advances in the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the assessment of skeletal health, controversies and conundrums in osteoporosis care, skeletal health in transgender patients, management of patients with hypophosphatasia and hypophosphatemia, and treat-to-target approaches for managing patients with osteoporosis. The Proceedings of the 2021 Virtual Santa Fe Bone Symposium consists of highlights of each presentation with current strategies for optimizing the care of patients with skeletal disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Michael Lewiecki
- New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| | - Paul A Anderson
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - John P Bilezikian
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Neil Binkley
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | - Erik A Imel
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Diane Krueger
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Michael R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, USA, and Mary MacKillop Center for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Micol S Rothman
- University of Colorado Health School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McClung MR, Lukes AS, Venturella R, Santora AC, Zhai D, Wagman RB, Al-Hendy A. EFFECTS OF RELUGOLIX COMBINATION THERAPY ON BONE MINERAL DENSITY THROUGH 2 YEARS IN WOMEN WITH HEAVY MENSTRUAL BLEEDING ASSOCIATED WITH UTERINE FIBROIDS. Fertil Steril 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.07.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
9
|
Abstract
Therapy to activate bone formation is required to reverse and restore the damaged bone architecture found in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. The osteoanabolic drugs include teriparatide, which has been available for several years, and abaloparatide and romosozumab, novel osteoanabolic drugs that have become available more recently. By stimulating bone formation, these drugs produce greater increases in bone mass and bone strength, and they do so more quickly compared to the commonly used anti-remodeling (also called antiresorptive) drugs such as bisphosphonates. In head-to-head trials, teriparatide and romosozumab reduce fracture risk more effectively than do oral bisphosphonates in women with osteoporosis and high fracture risk. Osteoanabolic drugs have little role in the prevention of bone loss during early menopause, but they have an important place in the treatment of women at very high risk of fracture or who remain at high fracture risk after a course of bisphosphonate therapy. Primarily because of the high cost of the drugs, these therapies are initiated by specialists rather than primary-care physicians in most countries. This review will present the evidence for efficacy and safety of these drugs so that clinicians may discern their appropriate use when caring for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, USA.,Mary McKillop Center for Health Research, Australia Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - A L Clark
- Kaiser Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Papapoulos S, Bone H, Cosman F, Dempster DW, McClung MR, Nakamura T, Restrepo JFM, Bouxsein ML, Cohn D, de Papp A, Massaad R, Santora A. Incidence of Hip and Subtrochanteric/Femoral Shaft Fractures in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis in the Phase 3 Long-Term Odanacatib Fracture Trial. J Bone Miner Res 2021; 36:1225-1234. [PMID: 33724542 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
We prospectively assessed, with predefined criteria, the location and rates of all femur fractures (hip, subtrochanteric/femoral shaft [ST/FS], including atypical [AFF] and distal fractures) in women at increased fracture risk during treatment with the cathepsin K inhibitor, odanacatib (ODN), or placebo over 5 years in the Long-Term ODN Fracture Trial (LOFT and LOFT Extension [NCT00529373, EudraCT 2007-002693-66]). ODN was an investigational antiresorptive agent previously in development as an osteoporosis treatment that, unlike bisphosphonates, reduces bone formation only transiently. Women aged ≥65 years with a bone mineral density (BMD) T-score ≤-2.5 at the total hip (TH) or femoral neck (FN) or with a radiographic vertebral fracture and T-scores ≤-1.5 at the TH or FN were randomized (1:1) to receive ODN 50 mg/week or placebo. All patients received vitamin D3 (5600 IU/week) and calcium (total 1200 mg/d); the analysis included 16,071 women. Rates of all adjudicated low-energy femoral fractures were 0.38 versus 0.58/100 patient-years for ODN and placebo, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.82; nominal p < .001), and for low-energy hip fractures were 0.29 versus 0.56/100 patient-years, respectively (HR = 0.52; 95% CI 0.40-0.67; p < .001). The cumulative incidence of combined hip and ST/FS or hip fractures alone in the ODN group was consistently lower than in the placebo group (1.93% versus 3.11% for combined fractures and 1.53% versus 3.03% for hip fractures at 5 years, respectively). However, low-energy ST/FS fractures were more frequent in ODN-treated women than in placebo-treated women (24 versus 6, respectively). Among these, 12 fractures were adjudicated as AFF in 10 patients treated with ODN (0.03/100 patient-years) compared with none in the 6 placebo-treated women (estimated difference 0.03; 95% CI 0.02-0.06). These results provide insight into possible pathogeneses of AFF, suggesting that the current criteria for diagnosing these fractures may need to be reconsidered. © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Henry Bone
- Michigan Bone & Mineral Clinic, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | | | - Michael R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, USA.,Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | - Mary L Bouxsein
- Center for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
McClung MR, Bolognese MA, Brown JP, Reginster JY, Langdahl BL, Shi Y, Timoshanko J, Libanati C, Chines A, Oates MK. Skeletal responses to romosozumab after 12 months of denosumab. JBMR Plus 2021; 5:e10512. [PMID: 34258507 PMCID: PMC8260819 DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Romosozumab, a monoclonal anti‐sclerostin antibody that has the dual effect of increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption, reduces fracture risk within 12 months. In a post hoc, exploratory analysis, we evaluated the effects of romosozumab after 12 months of denosumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mass who had not received previous osteoporosis therapy. This phase 2 trial (NCT00896532) enrolled postmenopausal women with a lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck T‐score ≤ −2.0 and ≥ −3.5. Individuals were randomized to placebo or various romosozumab dosing regimens from baseline to month 24, were re‐randomized to 12 months of denosumab or placebo (months 24–36), and then all received romosozumab 210 mg monthly for 12 months (months 36–48). Results for the overall population have been previously published. Here, we present results for changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and levels of procollagen type I N‐terminal propeptide (P1NP) and β‐isomer of the C‐terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (β‐CTX) from a subset of women who were randomized to placebo for 24 months, were re‐randomized to receive denosumab (n = 16) or placebo (n = 12) for 12 months, and then received romosozumab for 12 months. In women who were randomized to placebo followed by denosumab, romosozumab treatment for 12 months maintained BMD gained during denosumab treatment at the total hip (mean change from end of denosumab treatment of 0.9%) and further increased BMD gains at the lumbar spine (mean change from end of denosumab treatment of 5.3%). Upon transition to romosozumab (months 36–48), P1NP and β‐CTX levels gradually returned to baseline from their reduced values during denosumab administration. Transitioning to romosozumab after 12 months of denosumab appears to improve lumbar spine BMD and maintain total hip BMD while possibly preventing the rapid increase in levels of bone turnover markers above baseline expected upon denosumab discontinuation. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center Portland Oregon USA.,Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research Australian Catholic University Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | | | - Jacques P Brown
- Laval University and CHU de Quebec (CHUL) Research Centre Quebec City Quebec Canada
| | | | | | - Yifei Shi
- Amgen Inc. Thousand Oaks California USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Recent evidence confirms the superiority of osteoanabolic therapy compared to anti-remodeling drugs for rapid improvement in bone density and fracture risk reduction, providing strong justification for the use of these anabolic agents as the initial therapy in high-risk patients, to be followed by anti-remodeling therapy. This review will highlight the results of recent studies and define the current status of osteoanabolic therapy for osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, USA.
- Mary MacKillop Center for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
McClung MR, Bolognese MA, Brown JP, Reginster JY, Langdahl BL, Maddox J, Shi Y, Rojeski M, Meisner PD, Grauer A. A single dose of zoledronate preserves bone mineral density for up to 2 years after a second course of romosozumab. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31:2231-2241. [PMID: 32623487 PMCID: PMC7560921 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05502-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED This phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of transitioning to zoledronate following romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. A single dose of 5 mg zoledronate generally maintained the robust BMD gains accrued with romosozumab treatment and was well tolerated. INTRODUCTION Follow-on therapy with an antiresorptive agent is necessary to maintain the skeletal benefits of romosozumab therapy. We evaluated the use of zoledronate following romosozumab treatment. METHODS This phase 2, dose-finding study enrolled postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD). Subjects who received various romosozumab doses or placebo from months 0-24 were rerandomized to denosumab (60 mg SC Q6M) or placebo for 12 months, followed by open-label romosozumab (210 mg QM) for 12 months. At month 48, subjects who had received active treatment for 48 months were assigned to no further active treatment and all other subjects were assigned to zoledronate 5 mg IV. Efficacy (BMD, P1NP, and β-CTX) and safety were evaluated for 24 months, up to month 72. RESULTS A total of 141 subjects entered the month 48-72 period, with 51 in the no further active treatment group and 90 in the zoledronate group. In subjects receiving no further active treatment, lumbar spine (LS) BMD decreased by 10.8% from months 48-72 but remained 4.2% above the original baseline. In subjects receiving zoledronate, LS BMD was maintained (percentage changes: - 0.8% from months 48-72; 12.8% from months 0-72). Similar patterns were observed for proximal femur BMD in both groups. With no further active treatment, P1NP and β-CTX decreased but remained above baseline at month 72. Following zoledronate, P1NP and β-CTX levels initially decreased but approached baseline by month 72. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION A zoledronate follow-on regimen can maintain robust BMD gains achieved with romosozumab treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, 2881 NW Cumberland Road, Portland, OR 97210, USA.
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | | | - J P Brown
- Laval University and CHU de Québec (CHUL) Research Centre, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - J-Y Reginster
- University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
- King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | | | - J Maddox
- Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - Y Shi
- Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | | | | | - A Grauer
- Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wu CH, Hung WC, Chang IL, Tsai TT, Chang YF, McCloskey EV, Watts NB, McClung MR, Huang CF, Chen CH, Wu KL, Tsai KS, Chan DC, Chen JF, Tu ST, Hwang JS, Xia W, Matsumoto T, Chung YS, Cooper C, Kanis JA, Yang RS, Chan WP. Pharmacologic intervention for prevention of fractures in osteopenic and osteoporotic postmenopausal women: Systemic review and meta-analysis. Bone Rep 2020; 13:100729. [PMID: 33195764 PMCID: PMC7645632 DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Emerging evidence has indicated a role for pharmacologic agents in the primary prevention of osteoporotic fracture, but have not yet been systematically reviewed for meta-analysis. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacologic interventions in reducing fracture risk and increasing bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis but without prevalent fragility fracture. Method The Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched from inception to September 30, 2019. Only randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating postmenopausal women with −1.0 > bone mineral density (BMD) T-score > −2.5 (low bone mass) and those with BMD T-score ≤ −2.5 (osteoporosis) but without baseline fractures, who were receiving anti-osteoporotic agents, providing quantitative outcomes data and evaluating risk of vertebral and/or non-vertebral fragility fracture at follow-up. The PRISMA guidelines were followed, applying a random-effects model. The primary endpoint was the effect of anti-osteoporotic regimens in reducing the incidence of vertebral fractures. Secondary endpoints were percentage changes in baseline BMD at the lumbar spine and total hip at 1 and 2 years follow up. Results Full-text review of 144 articles yielded, 20 for meta-analysis. Bisphosphonates reduced the risk of vertebral fracture (pooled OR = 0.50, 95%CIs = 0.36–0.71) and significantly increased lumbar spine BMD after 1 year, by 4.42% vs placebo (95%CIs = 3.70%–5.14%). At the hip, this value was 2.94% (95%CIs = 2.13%–3.75%). Overall results of limited studies for non-bisphosphonate drugs showed increased BMD and raloxifene significantly decreases the risk of subsequent clinical vertebral fractures. Conclusion The bisphosphonates are efficacious and most evident for the primary prevention of osteoporotic vertebral fractures, reducing their incidence and improving BMD in postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates reduced the risk of vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis but without fracture. Bisphosphonates increased BMD in postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis but without fracture. Limited studies for non-bisphosphonate drugs showed increased BMD in postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis but without fracture. Raloxifene decreased the risk of clinical vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis but without fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Hsing Wu
- Department of Family Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.,Institute of Geriatrics, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chieh Hung
- Department of Family Medicine, E-Da Hospital/I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Institute of Biotechnology and Chemical Engineering, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Medicine for International Student, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ing-Lin Chang
- Department of Orthopaedics, ChangHua Christian Hospital, ChangHua, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Ting Tsai
- Department of Orthopedics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Linkou, Taiwan
| | - Yin-Fan Chang
- Department of Family Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Eugene V McCloskey
- Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Nelson B Watts
- Mercy Health Osteoporosis and Bone Health Services, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | - Chun-Feng Huang
- Department of Family Medicine, National Yang Ming University Hospital, I-Lan, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Hwan Chen
- Orthopaedic Research Centre, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Orthopaedics, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Orthopaedics, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.,Institute of Medical Science and Technology, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Ling Wu
- Department of Family Medicine, Tainan Municipal Hospital (Managed by Show Chwan Medical Care Corporation), Tainan City, Taiwan.,Outpatient Clinic Department, Tainan Municipal Hospital (Managed by Show Chwan Medical Care Corporation), Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Keh-Sung Tsai
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ding-Cheng Chan
- Superintendent Office, National Taiwan University Hospital Chu-Tung Branch, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jung-Fu Chen
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Te Tu
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Jawl-Shan Hwang
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Linkou, Taiwan
| | - Weibo Xia
- Department of Endocrinology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Toshio Matsumoto
- Fujii Memorial Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Tokushima, Japan
| | - Yoon-Sok Chung
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,Oxford National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - John A Kanis
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, UK
| | - Rong-Sen Yang
- Department of Orthopaedics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University & Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wing P Chan
- Department of Radiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Herein we review the discovery, development, commercial history and legacy of risedronate or NE-58095, a potent N-containing bisphosphonate developed by scientists at the Cincinnati Miami Valley Laboratories and the Norwich Eaton Laboratories of Procter and Gamble. It is characterized by a hydroxyl substituent (R1) and a pyridyl-methylene substituent (R2) at the carbon bridging two phosphonate moieties. It was shown to have greater potency than alendronate in cell-based systems while binding affinity to bone matrix was lower than alendronate, accounting for the relatively rapid offset of bone turnover inhibition when therapy is discontinued. Risedronate was shown to significantly reduce serum alkaline phosphatase and clinical features in patients with Paget's disease and was approved for this indication, at a dose of 30 mg daily for 2 months, in 1998. Formal dose response testing for treatment of osteoporosis was not performed. In large Phase 3 studies, 5 mg risedronate daily increased bone mineral density more than did the 2.5 mg dose. As a result, the 2.5 mg dose was dropped from most of the Phase 3 studies after 12 months. The 5 mg daily dose was approved for treating and preventing postmenopausal osteoporosis and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in 2000. The drug was subsequently approved for treating men with osteoporosis. Following the leads of other companies, weekly and monthly preparations were developed and approved, based on non-inferiority BMD studies vs the 5 mg daily oral dose as was a unique dosing regimen of 75 mg given on 2 consecutive days each month. Finally, to overcome the effect of food on limiting the already poor gastrointestinal absorption of the drug, a once-weekly oral preparation containing the chelating agent EDTA and with an enteric coating delaying dissolution until the tablet was in the small intestine was approved in 2010 to be administered after breakfast. The Alliance for Better Bone Health, a collaboration between Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals and sanofi-aventis U.S. was formed to market risedronate as Actonel® and, subsequently, Actonel-EC® or Atelvia®. These drugs are still marketed by sanofi-aventis in some countries. The sale of the pharmaceutical division of Procter & Gamble to Warner Chilcott (US) was based, in large part, on the perceived value and marketability of the risedronate drugs. When marketing targets of Warner-Chilcott were not met, the rights of risedronate were sold to Allergan USA, Inc. which never actively promoted the drug. Generic forms of risedronate were introduced into the United States in 2015 but are rarely used, although several generic forms are actively marketed in other countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, United States of America; Mary MacKillop Center for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Frank H Ebetino
- Chemistry Department, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States of America; BioVinc, Pasadena, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chotiyarnwong P, McCloskey E, Eastell R, McClung MR, Gielen E, Gostage J, McDermott M, Chines A, Huang S, Cummings SR. A Pooled Analysis of Fall Incidence From Placebo-Controlled Trials of Denosumab. J Bone Miner Res 2020; 35:1014-1021. [PMID: 31999376 PMCID: PMC9328365 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Recent studies suggest that the RANK/RANKL system impacts muscle function and/or mass. In the pivotal placebo-controlled fracture trial of the RANKL inhibitor denosumab in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, treatment was associated with a lower incidence of non-fracture-related falls (p = 0.02). This ad hoc exploratory analysis pooled data from five placebo-controlled trials of denosumab to determine consistency across trials, if any, of the reduction of fall incidence. The analysis included trials in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis and low bone mass, men with osteoporosis, women receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer, and men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. The analysis was stratified by trial, and only included data from the placebo-controlled period of each trial. A time-to-event analysis of first fall and exposure-adjusted subject incidence rates of falls were analyzed. Falls were reported and captured as adverse events. The analysis comprised 10,036 individuals; 5030 received denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously once every 6 months for 12 to 36 months and 5006 received placebo. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed an occurrence of falls in 6.5% of subjects in the placebo group compared with 5.2% of subjects in the denosumab group (hazard ratio = 0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.66-0.93; p = 0.0061). Heterogeneity in study designs did not permit overall assessment of association with fracture outcomes. In conclusion, denosumab may reduce the risk of falls in addition to its established fracture risk reduction by reducing bone resorption and increasing bone mass. These observations require further exploration and confirmation in studies with muscle function or falls as the primary outcome. © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by American Society for Bone and Mineral Research..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pojchong Chotiyarnwong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.,Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, The Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Eugene McCloskey
- Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, The Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Richard Eastell
- Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, The Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Evelien Gielen
- Center for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, and Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism, and Aging, (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - John Gostage
- Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, The Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | | | | | - Steven R Cummings
- San Francisco Coordinating Center, California Pacific Medical Center (CPMC), Research Institute and the University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Constantine G, McClung MR, Kagan R, Graham S, Bernick B, Mirkin S. SAT-021 Effects of E2/P4 Oral Capsules on Bone Turnover in Women with Vasomotor Symptoms. J Endocr Soc 2020. [PMCID: PMC7208564 DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Menopausal hormone therapy slows bone turnover and reduces the risk of osteoporotic fractures. The objective of this post hoc analysis was to evaluate bone turnover markers (BTM) in the phase 3 REPLENISH trial, which evaluated vasomotor symptoms (VMS) with an oral estradiol/progesterone (E2/P4) in postmenopausal women with a uterus.
Eligible women for this analysis had ≥50 moderate to severe VMS/week, <5 years since last menstrual period, and BTM measurements at baseline, and months 6 and 12. Percent changes for 3 BTM (bone specific alkaline phosphatase [BSAP], C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen [CTX-1], and N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen [PINP]) assessed by immunoassay methods were evaluated from baseline to months 6 and 12 for the 1/100, 0.5/100 and placebo groups.
A total of 157 women (40–61 years, 69% White) were analyzed (56 for each 1/100 and 0.5/100; 45 for placebo). Mean baseline values ranged from 14.0–14.3 U/L for BSAP, 0.34–0.39 ng/mL for CTX-1, and 76.9–79.3 ng/mL for PINP. Mean differences in percent change from baseline versus placebo significantly decreased with both E2/P4 doses for all 3 BTM at months 6 and 12. Mean differences from placebo for E2/P4 at months 6/12 ranged from -8.1% to -17.8% for BSAP (all, P≤0.02), -30% to -41% for CTX-1 (all, P≤0.001), and -14% to -29% for PINP (all, P≤0.007).
REPLENISH data provide support for a potential skeletal benefit of E2/P4 when used for the treatment of moderate to severe VMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Risa Kagan
- Universtiy of California and Sutter East Bay Medical Foundation, San Francisco/Berkeley, CA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lewiecki EM, Bilezikian JP, Kagan R, Krakow D, McClung MR, Miller PD, Rush ET, Shuhart CR, Watts NB, Yu EW. Proceedings of the 2019 Santa Fe Bone Symposium: New Concepts in the Care of Osteoporosis and Rare Bone Diseases. J Clin Densitom 2020; 23:1-20. [PMID: 31685420 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2019.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The 20th annual Santa Fe Bone Symposium was held August 9-10, 2019, in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA. This is an annual meeting devoted to clinical applications of recent advances in skeletal research that impact the care of patients with osteoporosis, metabolic bone diseases, and inherited bone diseases. Participants included practicing and academic physicians, fellows, advanced practice providers, fracture liaison service (FLS) coordinators, clinical researchers, and bone density technologists. The symposium consisted of lectures, case presentations, and panel discussions, with an emphasis on learning through interaction of all attendees. Topics included new approaches in the use of anabolic agents for the treatment osteoporosis, a review of important events in skeletal health over the past year, new and emerging treatments for rare bone diseases, the use of genetic testing for bone diseases in clinical practice, medication-associated causes of osteoporosis, new concepts in the use of estrogen therapy for osteoporosis, new Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, skeletal consequences of bariatric surgery, and update on the progress and potential of Bone Health TeleECHO, a virtual community of practice using videoconferencing technology to link healthcare professionals for advancing the care of osteoporosis worldwide. Sessions on rare bone diseases were developed in collaboration with the Rare Bone Disease Alliance. Symposium premeetings included an FLS workshop by the National Osteoporosis Foundation and others devoted to the use of new therapeutic agents for the care of osteoporosis and related disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Michael Lewiecki
- New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| | - John P Bilezikian
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, NYC, NY, USA
| | - Risa Kagan
- UCSF and Sutter East Bay Medical Foundation, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Deborah Krakow
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, USA; Mary MacKillop Center for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Paul D Miller
- University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Eric T Rush
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, MO, USA; Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA; University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | | | - Nelson B Watts
- Mercy Health Osteoporosis and Bone Health Services, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Elaine W Yu
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
McClung MR, O'Donoghue ML, Papapoulos SE, Bone H, Langdahl B, Saag KG, Reid IR, Kiel DP, Cavallari I, Bonaca MP, Wiviott SD, de Villiers T, Ling X, Lippuner K, Nakamura T, Reginster JY, Rodriguez-Portales JA, Roux C, Zanchetta J, Zerbini CAF, Park JG, Im K, Cange A, Grip LT, Heyden N, DaSilva C, Cohn D, Massaad R, Scott BB, Verbruggen N, Gurner D, Miller DL, Blair ML, Polis AB, Stoch SA, Santora A, Lombardi A, Leung AT, Kaufman KD, Sabatine MS. Odanacatib for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: results of the LOFT multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and LOFT Extension study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2019; 7:899-911. [PMID: 31676222 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30346-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Revised: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Odanacatib, a cathepsin K inhibitor, reduces bone resorption while maintaining bone formation. Previous work has shown that odanacatib increases bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of odanacatib to reduce fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. METHODS The Long-term Odanacatib Fracture Trial (LOFT) was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven study at 388 outpatient clinics in 40 countries. Eligible participants were women aged at least 65 years who were postmenopausal for 5 years or more, with a femoral neck or total hip bone mineral density T-score between -2·5 and -4·0 if no previous radiographic vertebral fracture, or between -1·5 and -4·0 with a previous vertebral fracture. Women with a previous hip fracture, more than one vertebral fracture, or a T-score of less than -4·0 at the total hip or femoral neck were not eligible unless they were unable or unwilling to use approved osteoporosis treatment. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either oral odanacatib (50 mg once per week) or matching placebo. Randomisation was done using an interactive voice recognition system after stratification for previous radiographic vertebral fracture, and treatment was masked to study participants, investigators and their staff, and sponsor personnel. If the study completed before 5 years of double-blind treatment, consenting participants could enrol in a double-blind extension study (LOFT Extension), continuing their original treatment assignment for up to 5 years from randomisation. Primary endpoints were incidence of vertebral fractures as assessed using radiographs collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months, yearly, and at final study visit in participants for whom evaluable radiograph images were available at baseline and at least one other timepoint, and hip and non-vertebral fractures adjudicated as being a result of osteoporosis as assessed by clinical history and radiograph. Safety was assessed in participants who received at least one dose of study drug. The adjudicated cardiovascular safety endpoints were a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and new-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter. Individual cardiovascular endpoints and death were also assessed. LOFT and LOFT Extension are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT00529373) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT number 2007-002693-66). FINDINGS Between Sept 14, 2007, and Nov 17, 2009, we randomly assigned 16 071 evaluable patients to treatment: 8043 to odanacatib and 8028 to placebo. After a median follow-up of 36·5 months (IQR 34·43-40·15) 4297 women assigned to odanacatib and 3960 assigned to placebo enrolled in LOFT Extension (total median follow-up 47·6 months, IQR 35·45-60·06). In LOFT, cumulative incidence of primary outcomes for odanacatib versus placebo were: radiographic vertebral fractures 3·7% (251/6770) versus 7·8% (542/6910), hazard ratio (HR) 0·46, 95% CI 0·40-0·53; hip fractures 0·8% (65/8043) versus 1·6% (125/8028), 0·53, 0·39-0·71; non-vertebral fractures 5·1% (412/8043) versus 6·7% (541/8028), 0·77, 0·68-0·87; all p<0·0001. Combined results from LOFT plus LOFT Extension for cumulative incidence of primary outcomes for odanacatib versus placebo were: radiographic vertebral fractures 4·9% (341/6909) versus 9·6% (675/7011), HR 0·48, 95% CI 0·42-0·55; hip fractures 1·1% (86/8043) versus 2·0% (162/8028), 0·52, 0·40-0·67; non-vertebral fractures 6·4% (512/8043) versus 8·4% (675/8028), 0·74, 0·66-0·83; all p<0·0001. In LOFT, the composite cardiovascular endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in 273 (3·4%) of 8043 patients in the odanacatib group versus 245 (3·1%) of 8028 in the placebo group (HR 1·12, 95% CI 0·95-1·34; p=0·18). New-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter occurred in 112 (1·4%) of 8043 patients in the odanacatib group versus 96 (1·2%) of 8028 in the placebo group (HR 1·18, 0·90-1·55; p=0·24). Odanacatib was associated with an increased risk of stroke (1·7% [136/8043] vs 1·3% [104/8028], HR 1·32, 1·02-1·70; p=0·034), but not myocardial infarction (0·7% [60/8043] vs 0·9% [74/8028], HR 0·82, 0·58-1·15; p=0·26). The HR for all-cause mortality was 1·13 (5·0% [401/8043] vs 4·4% [356/8028], 0·98-1·30; p=0·10). When data from LOFT Extension were included, the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in significantly more patients in the odanacatib group than in the placebo group (401 [5·0%] of 8043 vs 343 [4·3%] of 8028, HR 1·17, 1·02-1·36; p=0·029, as did stroke (2·3% [187/8043] vs 1·7% [137/8028], HR 1·37, 1·10-1·71; p=0·0051). INTERPRETATION Odanacatib reduced the risk of fracture, but was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, specifically stroke, in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Based on the overall balance between benefit and risk, the study's sponsor decided that they would no longer pursue development of odanacatib for treatment of osteoporosis. FUNDING Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, USA; Mary MacKillop Center for Health Research, Australian Catholic Unversity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michelle L O'Donoghue
- Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Henry Bone
- Michigan Bone and Mineral Clinic, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | - Kenneth G Saag
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Ian R Reid
- University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Douglas P Kiel
- Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ilaria Cavallari
- Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marc P Bonaca
- Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen D Wiviott
- Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Xu Ling
- Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Kurt Lippuner
- Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Jean-Yves Reginster
- Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics and WHO Collaborating Centre for Public Health Aspects of Musculoskeletal Health and Aging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | | | - Christian Roux
- Paris Descartes University, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | - José Zanchetta
- Institute of Metabolic Research, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Jeong-Gun Park
- Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - KyungAh Im
- Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Abby Cange
- Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laura T Grip
- Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marc S Sabatine
- Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Guagnelli MA, Winzenrieth R, Lopez-Gonzalez D, McClung MR, Del Rio L, Clark P. Bone age as a correction factor for the analysis of trabecular bone score (TBS) in children. Arch Osteoporos 2019; 14:26. [PMID: 30815747 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-019-0573-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 01/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a tool to improve evaluation of DXA scans, barely used in children. We proposed to evaluate TBS with bone age (BA) compared to chronological age (CA). In girls, TBS value using BA is constant until age 8, and in boys until age 10, and then starts to increase steadily. This data may help widen TBS use in pediatric populations. INTRODUCTION Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a software-based tool for the analysis of DXA images to assess bone microarchitecture in the lumbar region. It is used widely in adults to improve evaluation of fracture risk, yet it has been rarely studied in children and no normal curves have been developed for pediatrics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate bone (skeletal) age compared to chronological age to determine which is better in the pediatric population since both bone age (BA) and trabecular density are equally susceptible to change in response to similar factors. METHODS Total body, lumbar region, and non-dominant hand scans were obtained with an iDXA device in all participants. DXA scans of lumbar region for TBS analysis and AP images of non-dominant hand-for-BA were obtained for 565 children (269 female) aged 4to 19. RESULTS Simple correlation was calculated and r2 values for TBS and chronological age were obtained by linear regression, with low correlations (0.36 for boys and 0.38 for girls), and then we created Loess curves to show the change for consecutive ages. In girls, the curve forms a U shape with a nadir point at approximately age 10. We then replaced chronological age with BA, and significant change was seen in the girls' curve, where a turning point is seen at age 8. In boys, a similar trend shows a turning point at age 10. Finally, BA-corrected TBS curves were constructed using LMS, obtaining curves with percentiles. CONCLUSIONS The use of BA in the analysis and interpretation of TBS may help widen its use in pediatric populations by enabling the appearance of normative data, but more information is needed to confirm this finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Angel Guagnelli
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Desiree Lopez-Gonzalez
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Michael R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, USA.,AustralianCatholicUniversity, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Patricia Clark
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico. .,Facultad de Medicina, UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Fractures resulting from osteoporosis become increasingly common in women after age 55 years and men after age 65 years, resulting in substantial bone-associated morbidities, and increased mortality and health-care costs. Research advances have led to a more accurate assessment of fracture risk and have increased the range of therapeutic options available to prevent fractures. Fracture risk algorithms that combine clinical risk factors and bone mineral density are now widely used in clinical practice to target high-risk individuals for treatment. The discovery of key pathways regulating bone resorption and formation has identified new approaches to treatment with distinctive mechanisms of action. Osteoporosis is a chronic condition and long-term, sometimes lifelong, management is required. In individuals at high risk of fracture, the benefit versus risk profile is likely to be favourable for up to 10 years of treatment with bisphosphonates or denosumab. In people at a very high or imminent risk of fracture, therapy with teriparatide or abaloparatide should be considered; however, since treatment duration with these drugs is restricted to 18-24 months, treatment should be continued with an antiresorptive drug. Individuals at high risk of fractures do not receive adequate treatment and strategies to address this treatment gap-eg, widespread implementation of Fracture Liaison Services and improvement of adherence to therapy-are important challenges for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael R McClung
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Mary MacKillop Institute for Health, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - William D Leslie
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lewiecki EM, Bilezikian JP, Giangregorio L, Greenspan SL, Khosla S, Kostenuik P, Krohn K, McClung MR, Miller PD, Pacifici R. Proceedings of the 2018 Santa Fe Bone Symposium: Advances in the Management of Osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom 2019; 22:1-19. [PMID: 30366683 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2018.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2018] [Accepted: 09/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The Santa Fe Bone Symposium is an annual meeting devoted to clinical applications of recent advances in skeletal research. The 19th Santa Fe Bone Symposium convened August 3-4, 2018, in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA. Attendees included physicians of many specialties, fellows in training, advanced practice providers, clinical researchers, and bone density technologists. The format consisted of lectures, case presentations by endocrinology fellows, and panel discussions, with all involving extensive interactive discussions. Topics were diverse, including an evolutionary history of calcium homeostasis, osteoporosis treatment in the very old, optimizing outcomes with orthopedic surgery, microbiome and bone, new strategies for combination and sequential therapy of osteoporosis, exercise as medicine, manifestations of parathyroid hormone excess and deficiency, parathyroid hormone as a therapeutic agent, cell senescence and bone health, and managing patients outside clinical practice guidelines. The National Bone Health Alliance conducted a premeeting on development of fracture liaison services. A workshop was devoted to Bone Health TeleECHO (Bone Health Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes), a strategy of ongoing medical education for healthcare professions to expand capacity to deliver best practice skeletal healthcare in underserved communities and reduce the osteoporosis treatment gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Michael Lewiecki
- New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| | - John P Bilezikian
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, NYC, NY, USA
| | - Lora Giangregorio
- University of Waterloo and Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Michael R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, USA; MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Paul D Miller
- University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Roberto Pacifici
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Lipids, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
McClung MR, Brown JP, Diez-Perez A, Resch H, Caminis J, Meisner P, Bolognese MA, Goemaere S, Bone HG, Zanchetta JR, Maddox J, Bray S, Grauer A. Effects of 24 Months of Treatment With Romosozumab Followed by 12 Months of Denosumab or Placebo in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2, Parallel Group Study. J Bone Miner Res 2018; 33:1397-1406. [PMID: 29694685 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2017] [Revised: 04/11/2018] [Accepted: 04/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Over 12 months, romosozumab increased bone formation and decreased bone resorption, resulting in increased bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with low BMD (NCT00896532). Herein, we report the study extension evaluating 24 months of treatment with romosozumab, discontinuation of romosozumab, alendronate followed by romosozumab, and romosozumab followed by denosumab. Postmenopausal women aged 55 to 85 years with a lumbar spine (LS), total hip (TH), or femoral neck T-score ≤-2.0 and ≥-3.5 were enrolled and randomly assigned to placebo, one of five romosozumab regimens (70 mg, 140 mg, 210 mg monthly [QM]; 140 mg Q3M; 210 mg Q3M) for 24 months, or open-label alendronate for 12 months followed by romosozumab 140 mg QM for 12 months. Eligible participants were then rerandomized 1:1 within original treatment groups to placebo or denosumab 60 mg Q6M for an additional 12 months. Percentage change from baseline in BMD and bone turnover markers (BTMs) at months 24 and 36 and safety were evaluated. Of 364 participants initially randomized to romosozumab, placebo, or alendronate, 315 completed 24 months of treatment and 248 completed the extension. Romosozumab markedly increased LS and TH BMD through month 24, with largest gains observed with romosozumab 210 mg QM (LS = 15.1%; TH = 5.4%). Women receiving romosozumab who transitioned to denosumab continued to accrue BMD, whereas BMD returned toward pretreatment levels with placebo. With romosozumab 210 mg QM, bone formation marker P1NP initially increased after treatment initiation and gradually decreased to below baseline by month 12, remaining below baseline through month 24; bone resorption marker β-CTX rapidly decreased after treatment, remaining below baseline through month 24. Transition to denosumab further decreased both BTMs, whereas after transition to placebo, P1NP returned to baseline and β-CTX increased above baseline. Adverse events were balanced between treatment groups through month 36. These data suggest that treatment effects of romosozumab are reversible upon discontinuation and further augmented by denosumab. © 2018 The Authors Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, USA.,Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jacques P Brown
- Laval University and CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Adolfo Diez-Perez
- Medicine Hospital del Mar/IMIM, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Henry G Bone
- Michigan Bone and Mineral Clinic, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jose R Zanchetta
- Instituto de Investigaciones Metabólicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
McClung MR, Williams GC, Hattersley G, Fitzpatrick LA, Wang Y, Miller PD. Correction to: Geography of Fracture Incidence in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis Treated with Abaloparatide. Calcif Tissue Int 2018; 102:634. [PMID: 29383409 PMCID: PMC6828013 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-018-0390-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
The article Geography of Fracture Incidence in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis Treated with Abaloparatide, written by Michael R. McClung, Gregory C. Williams, Gary Hattersley, Lorraine A. Fitzpatrick, Yamei Wang, Paul D. Miller, was originally published electronically on the publisher's internet portal (currently SpringerLink) on 28 December 2017 without open access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, 97210, USA.
- Institute of Health and Ageing, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | - Paul D Miller
- Panorama Orthopedics and Spine Center, Golden, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
McClung MR, Williams GC, Hattersley G, Fitzpatrick LA, Wang Y, Miller PD. Geography of Fracture Incidence in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis Treated with Abaloparatide. Calcif Tissue Int 2018; 102:627-633. [PMID: 29285549 PMCID: PMC5956009 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-017-0375-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2017] [Accepted: 12/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Geographic heterogeneity has been observed in fracture risk and efficacy of therapeutic intervention in postmenopausal osteoporosis. The objectives of these analyses were to assess across geographic and ethnic subgroups the heterogeneity of fracture incidence and baseline risk, and consistency of effect of abaloparatide-SC vs placebo on fracture risk reduction in the 18-month, phase 3, multinational, ACTIVE randomized controlled trial. Prespecified exploratory analyses of geographic subgroups (North America, South America, Europe, Asia) and post hoc analyses of ethnic subgroups (Hispanic or Latino, other) of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis enrolled in the abaloparatide-SC and placebo cohorts (n = 1645) were performed. Country-specific FRAX models were used to calculate 10-year absolute fracture risks. Relative risk reductions for vertebral fractures and hazard ratios for non-vertebral, clinical, and major osteoporotic fractures were calculated. Forest plots were constructed to assess treatment-by-subgroup interactions for each geographic region and ethnicity. Baseline prevalence of vertebral fractures was similar across geographies; baseline prevalence of non-vertebral fractures was more variable. Ten-year major osteoporosis fracture and hip fracture risks were variable across and within regions. The effects of abaloparatide-SC on reducing the risk of vertebral, non-vertebral, clinical, and major osteoporotic fractures were similar across regions, and for Hispanic or Latino vs other ethnicities. A limitation was the limited power to detect interactions with few events. In conclusion, despite geographic variability in fracture incidence and risk at baseline, no differences were detected in the effects of abaloparatide-SC in reducing vertebral, non-vertebral, clinical, and major osteoporotic fracture risk across assessed geographic regions and ethnicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, 97210, USA.
- Institute of Health and Ageing, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | - Paul D Miller
- Panorama Orthopedics and Spine Center, Golden, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Romosozumab, a specific inhibitor of sclerostin, is a unique approach to therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis and related disorders. The elucidation of sclerostin deficiency as the molecular defect of syndromes of high bone mass with normal quality, and the pivotal role of sclerostin as a mediator of osteoblastic activity and bone formation, provided the platform for the evaluation of inhibitors of sclerostin to activate bone formation. An extensive preclinical program and 2 large fracture endpoint trials with romosozumab, a sclerostin-binding antibody, have been completed. This review will highlight the results of those studies and describe the current status of romosozumab as a potential therapy for osteoporosis.
Collapse
|
27
|
Lewiecki EM, Bilezikian JP, Carey JJ, Dell RM, Gordon CM, Harris ST, McClung MR, Miller PD, Rosenblatt M. Proceedings of the 2017 Santa Fe Bone Symposium: Insights and Emerging Concepts in the Management of Osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom 2018; 21:3-21. [PMID: 29229501 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.10.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Accepted: 10/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The 18th Annual Santa Fe Bone Symposium was held on August 4-5, 2017, in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA. The symposium convenes health-care providers and clinical researchers to present and discuss clinical applications of recent advances in research of skeletal diseases. The program includes lectures, oral presentations by endocrinology fellows, case-based panel discussions, and breakout sessions on topics of interest, with emphasis on participation and interaction of all participants. Topics included the evaluation and treatment of adult survivors with pediatric bone diseases, risk assessment and management of atypical femur fractures, nonpharmacologic strategies in the care of osteoporosis, and skeletal effects of parathyroid hormone with opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Management of skeletal complications of rheumatic diseases was discussed. Insights into sequential and combined use of antiresorptive agents were presented. Individualization of patient treatment decisions when clinical practice guidelines may not be applicable was covered. Challenges and opportunities with osteoporosis drug development were discussed. There was an update on progress of Bone Health TeleECHO (Bone Health Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes), a teleconferencing strategy for sharing knowledge and expanding capacity to deliver best-practice skeletal health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Michael Lewiecki
- New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| | - John P Bilezikian
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Catherine M Gordon
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Steven T Harris
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Paul D Miller
- University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
McClung MR, Lippuner K, Brandi ML, Zanchetta JR, Bone HG, Chapurlat R, Hans D, Wang A, Zapalowski C, Libanati C. Effect of denosumab on trabecular bone score in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2017; 28:2967-2973. [PMID: 28748386 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-4140-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2017] [Accepted: 06/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Trabecular bone score (TBS) assesses bone quality in the lumbar spine using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, denosumab significantly improved TBS independently of bone mineral density (BMD). This practical technique may have a role in managing patients with osteoporosis. INTRODUCTION TBS, a gray-level texture index determined from lumbar spine DXA scans, correlates with bone microarchitecture and enhances assessment of vertebral fracture risk independently of BMD. In the FREEDOM study, denosumab increased BMD and reduced new vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. This retrospective analysis explored the effect of denosumab on TBS and the association between TBS and BMD in FREEDOM. METHODS Postmenopausal women with lumbar spine or total hip BMD T-score <-2.5 and -4.0 or higher at both sites received placebo or denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months. TBS indices were determined from DXA scans at baseline and months 12, 24, and 36 in a subset of 285 women (128 placebo, 157 denosumab) who had TBS values at baseline and ≥1 postbaseline visit. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were comparable between treatment groups; mean (SD) lumbar spine BMD T-score was -2.79 (0.64), and mean (standard deviation [SD]) TBS was 1.200 (0.101) overall. In the placebo group, BMD and TBS increased by ≤0.2% or decreased from baseline at each visit. In the denosumab group, progressive increases from baseline at 12, 24, and 36 months were observed for BMD (5.7, 7.8, and 9.8%) and TBS (1.4, 1.9, and 2.4%). Percentage changes in TBS were statistically significant compared with baseline (p < 0.001) and placebo (p ≤ 0.014). TBS was largely unrelated to BMD, regardless of treatment, either at baseline or for annual changes from baseline (all r 2 ≤ 0.06). CONCLUSIONS In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, denosumab significantly improved TBS independently of BMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, USA.
- Institute for Health and Ageing, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | | | | | - J R Zanchetta
- Instituto de Investigaciones Metabólicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - H G Bone
- Michigan Bone and Mineral Clinic, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - R Chapurlat
- INSERM UMR 1033, Université de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - D Hans
- Lausanne University Hospital, Center of Bone Diseases, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - A Wang
- Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - C Zapalowski
- Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
- Radius Health, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - C Libanati
- Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
- UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
McClung MR. Sclerostin antibodies in osteoporosis: latest evidence and therapeutic potential. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2017; 9:263-270. [PMID: 28974988 DOI: 10.1177/1759720x17726744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Sclerostin is an osteocyte-derived glycoprotein that inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signaling and activation of osteoblast function, thereby inhibiting bone formation. It plays a vital role in the regulation of skeletal growth. In adults, sclerostin secretion is modulated by skeletal loading (increased secretion with immobilization; less with weight bearing) and by hormonal/cytokine actions on the osteocyte. Sclerostin deficiency syndromes in humans and animals are characterized by high bone mass of normal quality. In animal models of osteoporosis, inhibition of sclerostin by monoclonal antibodies induces osteoblast activity and new bone formation, normalizing bone mass and improving bone architecture and strength. In recently completed clinical trials, anti-sclerostin antibody therapy results in marked increases in bone mineral density and rapid and substantial reduction in fracture risk. This review will focus on these recent studies and anticipate the role of anti-sclerostin therapy in the management of patients with osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R McClung
- Institute for Health and Ageing, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC Oregon Osteoporosis Center, 2881 NW Cumberland Road, Portland, OR 97210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The objective of this review is to update evidence regarding the use of osteoporosis drugs in sequence or in combination to optimize increases in bone mass and strength. RECENT FINDINGS Simultaneous use of denosumab plus teriparatide produces larger increases in BMD than does monotherapy. The use of bisphosphonates or denosumab after teriparatide results in progressive gains in BMD. When switching from bisphosphonates and especially denosumab to teriparatide, an overlap of 6-12 months may prevent the transient loss of BMD in cortical sites. Phase 3 trials document fracture risk reduction with anabolic therapy for 12-18 months followed by an anti-remodeling drug. With the exception of adding teriparatide to ongoing denosumab therapy, there is little evidence to support the use of more than one osteoporosis drug at a time. In contrast, sequential therapy regimens of anabolic drugs followed by potent anti-remodeling agents will be the new standard for treating patients at imminent risk of fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R McClung
- Institute of Health and Ageing, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, 2881 NW Cumberland Road, Portland, OR, 97210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hanley DA, McClung MR, Davison KS, Dian L, Harris ST, Miller PD, Lewiecki EM, Kendler DL. Western Osteoporosis Alliance Clinical Practice Series: Evaluating the Balance of Benefits and Risks of Long-Term Osteoporosis Therapies. Am J Med 2017; 130:862.e1-862.e7. [PMID: 28359721 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Revised: 03/01/2017] [Accepted: 03/01/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a chronic disease that requires life-long strategies to reduce fracture risk. Few trials have investigated the balance of benefits and risk with long-term use of osteoporosis therapies, and fewer still have investigated the consequences of treatment discontinuation. The best available evidence suggests that up to 10 years of treatment with an oral bisphosphonate maintains the degree of fracture risk reduction observed in the 3-year registration trials. With denosumab, 10 years of therapy appears to provide fracture risk reduction similar to or better than that observed in the 3-year registration trial. Available data suggest an increasing but low risk of fractures with atypical features with increasing duration of bisphosphonate therapy. Published data linking duration of therapy to osteonecrosis of the jaw are lacking for bisphosphonates and denosumab. Other side effects associated with denosumab or bisphosphonates do not appear to be related to therapy duration. The antifracture benefits of long-term therapy with bisphosphonates and denosumab in appropriately selected patients outweigh the low risk of serious side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Hanley
- Departments of Medicine, Oncology, and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Michael R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland; Institute of Health and Ageing, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Larry Dian
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Steve T Harris
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | | | - David L Kendler
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lewiecki EM, Bilezikian JP, Bukata SV, Camacho P, Clarke BL, McClung MR, Miller PD, Shepherd J. Proceedings of the 2016 Santa Fe Bone Symposium: New Concepts in the Management of Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases. J Clin Densitom 2017; 20:134-152. [PMID: 28185765 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2016] [Accepted: 01/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The Santa Fe Bone Symposium is an annual meeting of healthcare professionals and clinical researchers that details the clinical relevance of advances in knowledge of skeletal diseases. The 17th Santa Fe Bone Symposium was held in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, on August 5-6, 2016. The program included plenary lectures, oral presentations by endocrinology fellows, meet-the-professor sessions, and panel discussions, all aimed to provide ample opportunity for interactive discussions among all participants. Symposium topics included recent developments in the translation of basic bone science to patient care, new clinical practice guidelines for postmenopausal osteoporosis, management of patients with disorders of phosphate metabolism, new and emerging treatments for rare bone diseases, strategies to enhance fracture healing, and an update on Bone Health Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes, using a teleconferencing platform to elevate the level of knowledge of healthcare professionals in underserved communities to deliver best practice care for skeletal diseases. The highlights and important clinical messages of the 2016 Santa Fe Bone Symposium are provided herein by each of the faculty presenters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Michael Lewiecki
- New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| | - John P Bilezikian
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Pauline Camacho
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA
| | | | | | - Paul D Miller
- Colorado Center for Bone Research at Centura Health, Lakewood, CO, USA
| | - John Shepherd
- Department of Radiology and Biochemical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Based on a platform of strong preclinical data, several studies in humans have demonstrated that inhibiting sclerostin with specific antibodies results in a brisk albeit transient anabolic response in the skeleton without an accompanying increase in bone resorption. Impressive increases in bone mineral density and bone strength have been demonstrated. Other than mild injection site reactions, therapy for up to 2years has been well tolerated. The restriction of sclerostin expression almost exclusively to skeletal tissues, coupled with the absence of recognized medical problems in patients with heterozygous sclerostin deficiency, provides promise that the drug can be used safely. Recent results from a Phase 3 fracture trial suggest that anti-sclerostin therapy will be a useful and welcomed new treatment for patients with severe osteoporosis in need of skeletal reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, 2881 NW Cumberland Road, Portland, OR 97210, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Denosumab, a specific inhibitor of RANK ligand, is a novel therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis and related disorders. An extensive clinical development program has evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of denosumab with several thousand patients being followed for up to 10 years. Combined with more than six years of postmarketing experience, these studies provide substantial confidence that denosumab is a convenient and appropriate treatment for patients, including Asians, at high risk for fracture. This review will summarize the clinical development of denosumab and lessons learned since its approval for clinical use in 2010.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R McClung
- Institute of Health and Ageing, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.,Oregon Osteoporosis Center, 2881 NW Cumberland Road, Portland, OR 97210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Zebaze R, Libanati C, McClung MR, Zanchetta JR, Kendler DL, Høiseth A, Wang A, Ghasem-Zadeh A, Seeman E. Denosumab Reduces Cortical Porosity of the Proximal Femoral Shaft in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 2016; 31:1827-1834. [PMID: 27082709 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2015] [Revised: 04/06/2016] [Accepted: 04/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Hip fractures account for over one-half the morbidity, mortality, and cost associated with osteoporosis. Fragility of the proximal femur is the result of rapid and unbalanced bone remodeling events that excavate more bone than they deposit, producing a porous, thinned, and fragile cortex. We hypothesized that the slowing of remodeling during treatment with denosumab allows refilling of the many cavities excavated before treatment now opposed by excavation of fewer new resorption cavities. The resulting net effect is a reduction in cortical porosity and an increase in proximal femur strength. Images were acquired at baseline and 36 months using multidetector CT in 28 women receiving denosumab and 22 women receiving placebo in a substudy of FREEDOM, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Porosity was quantified using StrAx1.0 software. Strength was estimated using finite element analysis. At baseline, the higher the serum resorption marker, CTx, the greater the porosity of the total cortex (r = 0.34, p = 0.02), and the higher the porosity, the lower the hip strength (r = -0.31, p = 0.03). By 36 months, denosumab treatment reduced porosity of the total cortex by 3.6% relative to baseline. Reductions in porosity relative to placebo at 36 months were 5.3% in total cortex, 7.9% in compact-appearing cortex, 5.6% in outer transitional zone, and 1.8% in inner transitional zone (all p < 0.01). The improvement in estimated hip integral strength of 7.9% from baseline (p < 0.0001) was associated with the reduction in total porosity (r = -0.41, p = 0.03). In summary, denosumab reduced cortical porosity of the proximal femoral shaft, resulting in increased mineralized matrix volume and improved strength, changes that may contribute to the reduction in hip and nonvertebral fractures reported with denosumab therapy. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Zebaze
- Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | - José R Zanchetta
- Instituto de Investigaciones Metabólicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | | | | | - Ego Seeman
- Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
McClung MR. REINVIGORATING THE OSTEOPOROSIS MESSAGE. Endocr Pract 2016:EP161533.ED. [PMID: 27631671 DOI: 10.4158/ep161533.ed] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
|
37
|
Domiciano DS, Machado LG, Lopes JB, Figueiredo CP, Caparbo VF, Oliveira RM, Scazufca M, McClung MR, Pereira RM. Bone Mineral Density and Parathyroid Hormone as Independent Risk Factors for Mortality in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study in Brazil. The São Paulo Ageing & Health (SPAH) Study. J Bone Miner Res 2016; 31:1146-57. [PMID: 26814375 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2015] [Revised: 01/20/2016] [Accepted: 01/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Previous studies have shown a relationship between osteoporosis and increased mortality risk. However, none of these studies performed a concomitant evaluation of the parathyroid hormone (PTH)-calcium-vitamin D axis and bone mass to accurately determine the contribution of each of these parameters to survival in older subjects. Thus, we sought to investigate the association between bone parameters and mortality in a longitudinal, prospective, population-based cohort of 839 elderly subjects. Clinical data (including history of fractures and cardiovascular events) were assessed using a specific questionnaire. Laboratory exams, including serum 25OHD and PTH, were also performed. Bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and hip were evaluated using DXA. All analyses were performed at baseline (2005 to 2007). Mortality was recorded during follow-up. Multivariate Cox proportional regression was used to compute hazard ratios for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Over a mean 4.06 ± 1.07 years, there were 132 (15.7%) deaths. These individuals were compared to 707 subjects who were alive at the end of the coverage period for mortality data collection. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, age (HR 1.32; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.55; p = 0.001, for each 5-year increase), male gender (HR 1.90; 95% CI, 1.30 to 2.79; p = 0.001), recurrent falls (more than two in the previous year; HR 1.65; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.56; p = 0.026), diabetes mellitus (HR 2.17; 95% CI, 1.46 to 3.21; p < 0.001), low physical activity score (HR 1.78; 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.79; p = 0.011), prior cardiovascular event (HR 1.76; 95% CI, 1.18 to 2.63; p = 0.006), total hip BMD (HR 1.41; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.72; p = 0.001, per each 1 SD decrease), and intact PTH (iPTH) (HR 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.08; p < 0.001, per each 10 pg/mL increase) were independently associated with all-cause mortality. The subjects in the highest quartile of PTH (>49 pg/mL) were at a higher risk of cardiovascular death (HR 3.09; 95% CI, 1.36 to 6.99; p = 0.007) compared with the subjects in the lowest quartile (<26 pg/mL). Low BMD and higher PTH were significantly associated with mortality in community-dwelling older adults. These findings support the notion that careful screening of these bone parameters might lead to better management of older patients and improve outcomes in this population. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diogo S Domiciano
- Bone Metabolism Laboratory, Rheumatology Division, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luana G Machado
- Bone Metabolism Laboratory, Rheumatology Division, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jaqueline B Lopes
- Bone Metabolism Laboratory, Rheumatology Division, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Camille P Figueiredo
- Bone Metabolism Laboratory, Rheumatology Division, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Valéria F Caparbo
- Bone Metabolism Laboratory, Rheumatology Division, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Márcia Scazufca
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Rosa Mr Pereira
- Bone Metabolism Laboratory, Rheumatology Division, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Affiliation(s)
- M R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, 2881 NW Cumberland Road, Portland, OR, 97210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kendler DL, Bauer DC, Davison KS, Dian L, Hanley DA, Harris ST, McClung MR, Miller PD, Schousboe JT, Yuen CK, Lewiecki EM. Vertebral Fractures: Clinical Importance and Management. Am J Med 2016; 129:221.e1-10. [PMID: 26524708 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2015] [Revised: 09/17/2015] [Accepted: 09/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Vertebral fractures are common and can result in acute and chronic pain, decreases in quality of life, and diminished lifespan. The identification of vertebral fractures is important because they are robust predictors of future fractures. The majority of vertebral fractures do not come to clinical attention. Numerous modalities exist for visualizing suspected vertebral fracture. Although differing definitions of vertebral fracture may present challenges in comparing data between different investigations, at least 1 in 5 men and women aged >50 years have one or more vertebral fractures. There is clinical guidance to target spine imaging to individuals with a high probability of vertebral fracture. Radiology reports of vertebral fracture need to clearly state that the patient has a "fracture," with further pertinent details such as the number, recency, and severity of vertebral fracture, each of which is associated with risk of future fractures. Patients with vertebral fracture should be considered for antifracture therapy. Physical and pharmacologic modalities of pain control and exercises or physiotherapy to maintain spinal movement and strength are important components in the care of vertebral fracture patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D L Kendler
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - D C Bauer
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | - L Dian
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - D A Hanley
- Departments of Medicine, Oncology, and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - S T Harris
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | - P D Miller
- Colorado Center for Bone Research, Lakewood
| | - J T Schousboe
- Park Nicollet Health Services, Park Nicollet Osteoporosis Center, Minneapolis, Minn; Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - C K Yuen
- Prohealth Clinical Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - E M Lewiecki
- New Mexico Clinical Research and Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lewiecki EM, Baron R, Bilezikian JP, Gagel RE, Leonard MB, Leslie WD, McClung MR, Miller PD. Proceedings of the 2015 Santa Fe Bone Symposium: Clinical Applications of Scientific Advances in Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease. J Clin Densitom 2016; 19:102-16. [PMID: 26750746 PMCID: PMC6706250 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2015.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2015] [Accepted: 11/19/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The 2015 Santa Fe Bone Symposium was a venue for healthcare professionals and clinical researchers to present and discuss the clinical relevance of recent advances in the science of skeletal disorders, with a focus on osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease. Symposium topics included new developments in the translation of basic bone science to improved patient care, osteoporosis treatment duration, pediatric bone disease, update of fracture risk assessment, cancer treatment-related bone loss, fracture liaison services, a review of the most significant studies of the past year, and the use of telementoring with Bone Health Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes, a force multiplier to improve the care of osteoporosis in underserved communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Michael Lewiecki
- New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| | - Roland Baron
- Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John P Bilezikian
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Robert E Gagel
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - William D Leslie
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Paul D Miller
- Colorado Center for Bone Research, Lakewood, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Although several effective therapies are available for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and older men, there remains a need for the development of even more effective and acceptable drugs. Several new drugs that are in late-stage clinical development will be discussed. Abaloparatide (recombinant parathyroid hormone related peptide [PTHrP] analogue) has anabolic activity like teriparatide. Recent data from the phase 3 fracture prevention trial demonstrate that this agent is effective in reducing fracture risk. Inhibiting cathepsin K reduces bone resorption without decreasing the numbers or activity of osteoclasts, thereby preserving or promoting osteoblast function. Progressive increases in bone mineral density (BMD) have been observed over 5 years. Early data suggest that odanacatib effectively reduces fracture risk. Lastly, inhibiting sclerostin with humanized antibodies promotes rapid, substantial but transient increases in bone formation while inhibiting bone resorption. Marked increases in BMD have been observed in phase 2 studies. Fracture prevention studies are underway. The new therapies with novel and unique mechanisms of action may, alone or in combination, provide more effective treatment options for our patients.
Collapse
|
42
|
Zysset P, Pahr D, Engelke K, Genant HK, McClung MR, Kendler DL, Recknor C, Kinzl M, Schwiedrzik J, Museyko O, Wang A, Libanati C. Comparison of proximal femur and vertebral body strength improvements in the FREEDOM trial using an alternative finite element methodology. Bone 2015; 81:122-130. [PMID: 26141837 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2015] [Revised: 06/23/2015] [Accepted: 06/29/2015] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Denosumab reduced the incidence of new fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by 68% at the spine and 40% at the hip over 36 months compared with placebo in the FREEDOM study. This efficacy was supported by improvements from baseline in vertebral (18.2%) strength in axial compression and femoral (8.6%) strength in sideways fall configuration at 36 months, estimated in Newtons by an established voxel-based finite element (FE) methodology. Since FE analyses rely on the choice of meshes, material properties, and boundary conditions, the aim of this study was to independently confirm and compare the effects of denosumab on vertebral and femoral strength during the FREEDOM trial using an alternative smooth FE methodology. Unlike the previous FE study, effects on femoral strength in physiological stance configuration were also examined. QCT data for the proximal femur and two lumbar vertebrae were analyzed by smooth FE methodology at baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months for 51 treated (denosumab) and 47 control (placebo) subjects. QCT images were segmented and converted into smooth FE models to compute bone strength. L1 and L2 vertebral bodies were virtually loaded in axial compression and the proximal femora in both fall and stance configurations. Denosumab increased vertebral body strength by 10.8%, 14.0%, and 17.4% from baseline at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively (p<0.0001). Denosumab also increased femoral strength in the fall configuration by 4.3%, 5.1%, and 7.2% from baseline at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively (p<0.0001). Similar improvements were observed in the stance configuration with increases of 4.2%, 5.2%, and 5.2% from baseline (p≤0.0007). Differences between the increasing strengths with denosumab and the decreasing strengths with placebo were significant starting at 12 months (vertebral and femoral fall) or 24 months (femoral stance). Using an alternative smooth FE methodology, we confirmed the significant improvements in vertebral body and proximal femur strength previously observed with denosumab. Estimated increases in strength with denosumab and decreases with placebo were highly consistent between both FE techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dieter Pahr
- Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Klaus Engelke
- University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany and Synarc Germany, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Oleg Museyko
- University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Bone HG, Dempster DW, Eisman JA, Greenspan SL, McClung MR, Nakamura T, Papapoulos S, Shih WJ, Rybak-Feiglin A, Santora AC, Verbruggen N, Leung AT, Lombardi A. Erratum to: Odanacatib for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: development history and design and participant characteristics of LOFT, the Long-Term Odanacatib Fracture Trial. Osteoporos Int 2015; 26:2721. [PMID: 26359183 PMCID: PMC4713920 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-015-3274-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H G Bone
- Michigan Bone & Mineral Clinic, Detroit, MI, USA.
- The Osteoporosis Center at St. Luke's Hospital, Chesterfield, MO, USA.
| | | | - J A Eisman
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, University of Notre Dame Australia, St Vincent's Hospital and UNSW Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - M R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - T Nakamura
- University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - S Papapoulos
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - W J Shih
- Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | | | - A C Santora
- Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA
| | - N Verbruggen
- Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA
| | - A T Leung
- Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA
| | - A Lombardi
- Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
McClung MR. Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment of Osteoporosis: A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing. J Bone Miner Res 2015; 30:1754-7. [PMID: 26255988 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2015] [Revised: 03/12/2015] [Accepted: 08/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
45
|
Poole KE, Treece GM, Gee AH, Brown JP, McClung MR, Wang A, Libanati C. Response to: Comment on: "Denosumab Rapidly Increases Cortical Bone in Key Locations of the Femur: A 3D Bone Mapping Study in Women With Osteoporosis". J Bone Miner Res 2015; 30:1939-40. [PMID: 26174164 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2015] [Accepted: 06/03/2015] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Graham M Treece
- Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrew H Gee
- Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jacques P Brown
- CHU de Québec Research Centre (CRCHU), Laval University, Quebec City, Québec, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Affiliation(s)
- M R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, 25 NW 23rd Place, Suite 6 #175, Portland, OR, 97210, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Langdahl BL, Teglbjærg CS, Ho PR, Chapurlat R, Czerwinski E, Kendler DL, Reginster JY, Kivitz A, Lewiecki EM, Miller PD, Bolognese MA, McClung MR, Bone HG, Ljunggren Ö, Abrahamsen B, Gruntmanis U, Yang YC, Wagman RB, Mirza F, Siddhanti S, Orwoll E. A 24-month study evaluating the efficacy and safety of denosumab for the treatment of men with low bone mineral density: results from the ADAMO trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015; 100:1335-42. [PMID: 25607608 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2014-4079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT One in 4 men in the United States aged >50 years will have an osteoporosis-related fracture. Fewer data are available on osteoporosis treatment in men than in women. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate denosumab therapy in men with low bone mineral density (BMD). DESIGN This was a phase 3 study with 2 treatment periods: a previously reported 12-month double-blind, placebo-controlled phase and a 12-month open-label phase. SETTING This was a multicenter study conducted in North America and Europe. PARTICIPANTS A total of 228 men entered the open-label phase and 219 completed the study. INTERVENTION Men from the original denosumab (long-term) and placebo (crossover) groups received 60 mg of denosumab sc every 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES BMD, serum collagen type I C-telopeptide, and safety were measured. RESULTS During the open-label phase, continued BMD increases occurred with long-term denosumab treatment (2.2% lumbar spine, 0.9% total hip, 1.3% femoral neck, 1.3% trochanter, and 0.2% 1/3 radius), resulting in cumulative 24-month gains from baseline of 8.0%, 3.4%, 3.4%, 4.6%, and 0.7%, respectively (all P < .01). The crossover group showed BMD gains after 12 months of denosumab treatment similar to those of the long-term denosumab group during the first treatment year. Significant reductions in serum collagen type I C-teleopeptide were observed after denosumab administration. Adverse event rates were similar between groups, and no new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS In men with low BMD, denosumab treatment for a second year continued to increase BMD, maintained reductions in bone resorption, and was well tolerated. BMD increased in men initiating denosumab during the second year. These effects were similar to those previously seen in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and in men with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bente L Langdahl
- Aarhus University Hospital (B.L.L.), DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark; Center for Clinical and Basic Research (C.S.T.), 2750 Ballerup, Denmark; Amgen Inc. (P.-R.H., Y.-C.Y., R.B.W., F. M., S.S.), Thousand Oaks, California 91320; INSERM UMR 1033 (R.C.), Université de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, F-69437, Lyon, France; Krakow Medical Center (E.C.), Krakow, 31-501 Poland; University of British Columbia (D.L.K.), Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada; University of Liège (J.-Y.R.), 4000 Liège, Belgium; Altoona Center for Clinical Research (A.K.), Duncansville, Pennsylvania 16635; New Mexico Clinical Research and Osteoporosis Center (E.M.L.), Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106; Colorado Center for Bone Research (P.D.M.), Lakewood, Colorado 80227; Bethesda Health Research Center (M.A.B.), Bethesda, Maryland 20817; Oregon Osteoporosis Center (M.R.M.), Portland, Oregon 97213; Michigan Bone and Mineral Clinic (H.G.B.), Detroit, Michigan 48236; Uppsala University (Ö.L.), 751 05 Uppsala, Sweden; University of Southern Denmark and Glostrup Hospital (B.A.), DK-5000 Odense and Copenhagen, Denmark; Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Texas Southwestern (U.G.), Dallas, Texas 75390; and Oregon Health and Science University (E.O.), Portland, Oregon 97239
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bone HG, Dempster DW, Eisman JA, Greenspan SL, McClung MR, Nakamura T, Papapoulos S, Shih WJ, Rybak-Feiglin A, Santora AC, Verbruggen N, Leung AT, Lombardi A. Odanacatib for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: development history and design and participant characteristics of LOFT, the Long-Term Odanacatib Fracture Trial. Osteoporos Int 2015; 26:699-712. [PMID: 25432773 PMCID: PMC4312384 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2944-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2014] [Accepted: 10/02/2014] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
SUMMARY Odanacatib is a cathepsin K inhibitor investigated for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Phase 2 data indicate that 50 mg once weekly inhibits bone resorption and increases bone mineral density, with only a transient decrease in bone formation. We describe the background, design and participant characteristics for the phase 3 registration trial. INTRODUCTION Odanacatib (ODN) is a selective cathepsin K inhibitor being evaluated for the treatment of osteoporosis. In a phase 2 trial, ODN 50 mg once weekly reduced bone resorption while preserving bone formation and progressively increased BMD over 5 years. We describe the phase III Long-Term ODN Fracture Trial (LOFT), an event-driven, randomized, blinded placebo-controlled trial, with preplanned interim analyses to permit early termination if significant fracture risk reduction was demonstrated. An extension was planned, with participants remaining on their randomized treatment for up to 5 years, then transitioning to open-label ODN. METHODS The three primary outcomes were radiologically determined vertebral, hip, and clinical non-vertebral fractures. Secondary end points included clinical vertebral fractures, BMD, bone turnover markers, and safety and tolerability, including bone histology. Participants were women, 65 years or older, with a BMD T-score≤-2.5 at the total hip (TH) or femoral neck (FN) or with a prior radiographic vertebral fracture and a T-score≤-1.5 at the TH or FN. They were randomized to ODN or placebo tablets. All received weekly vitamin D3 (5600 international units (IU)) and daily calcium supplements as needed to ensure a daily intake of approximately 1200 mg. RESULTS Altogether, 16,713 participants were randomized at 387 centers. After a planned interim analysis, an independent data monitoring committee recommended that the study be stopped early due to robust efficacy and a favorable benefit/risk profile. Following the base study closeout, 8256 participants entered the study extension. CONCLUSIONS This report details the background and study design of this fracture end point trial and describes the baseline characteristics of its participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H G Bone
- Michigan Bone & Mineral Clinic, Detroit, MI, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Recker RR, Ste-Marie LG, Chavassieux P, McClung MR, Lundy MW. Bone safety with risedronate: histomorphometric studies at different dose levels and exposure. Osteoporos Int 2015; 26:327-37. [PMID: 25304456 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2850-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2014] [Accepted: 08/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED This report describes bone safety and histomorphometric data across different dose levels and dosing frequencies of risedronate. Normal bone structure and histomorphometric data were observed, with ongoing bone remodeling and mineralization regardless of dose. These data are reassuring and do not suggest compromised bone remodeling during treatment with established risedronate regimens. INTRODUCTION The efficacy and bone safety of risedronate 5 mg daily were established in pivotal phase III randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies. Histomorphometric analysis of paired biopsies demonstrated bone safety as reflected by presence of fluorescent tetracycline double-labels in all evaluable biopsies. This report describes bone safety and histomorphometric data across studies of various dose regimens of risedronate. METHODS Bridging studies, with bone mineral density as the primary endpoint, demonstrated non-inferiority of risedronate 35 mg and 50 mg once a week, risedronate 150 mg once a month, and a risedronate 75-mg dose on two consecutive days a month versus risedronate 5 mg daily. The low oral bioavailability and known dosing limitations due to food interactions of bisphosphonates have led to development of an oral delayed-release dose form of risedronate 35 mg to be taken weekly, before or after breakfast. Bone biopsies were collected at 24 months in studies involving these risedronate dosing regimens; bone safety and histomorphometric data were evaluated. RESULTS Qualitative bone histology showed normal mineralization of newly formed bone without evidence of pathological findings, such as osteomalacia, bone marrow dyscrasia, or bone marrow fibrosis. Importantly, ongoing bone remodeling, based on fluorochrome labeling, was observed in all patients regardless of dose and exposure. Key histomorphometric variables were comparable to those observed with the risedronate 5 mg daily dose and were within the range seen in healthy pre- and post-menopausal women. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the results are reassuring with respect to bone safety and histomorphometric data, and do not suggest oversuppression of bone remodeling during treatment with these established risedronate regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R R Recker
- Osteoporosis Research Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, 601 N. 30th Street Suite 4820, Omaha, NE, 68131, USA,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Poole KES, Treece GM, Gee AH, Brown JP, McClung MR, Wang A, Libanati C. Denosumab rapidly increases cortical bone in key locations of the femur: a 3D bone mapping study in women with osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 2015; 30:46-54. [PMID: 25088963 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2014] [Revised: 07/16/2014] [Accepted: 07/30/2014] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Women with osteoporosis treated for 36 months with twice-yearly injections of denosumab sustained fewer hip fractures compared with placebo. Treatment might improve femoral bone at locations where fractures typically occur. To test this hypothesis, we used 3D cortical bone mapping of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis to investigate the timing and precise location of denosumab versus placebo effects in the hips. We analyzed clinical computed tomography scans from 80 female participants in FREEDOM, a randomized trial, wherein half of the study participants received subcutaneous denosumab 60 mg twice yearly and the others received placebo. Cortical 3D bone thickness maps of both hips were created from scans at baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months. Cortical mass surface density maps were also created for each visit. After registration of each bone to an average femur shape model followed by statistical parametric mapping, we visualized and quantified statistically significant treatment effects. The technique allowed us to pinpoint systematic differences between denosumab and control and to display the results on a 3D average femur model. Denosumab treatment led to an increase in femoral cortical mass surface density and thickness, already evident by the third injection (12 months). Overall, treatment with denosumab increased femoral cortical mass surface density by 5.4% over 3 years. One-third of the increase came from increasing cortical density, and two-thirds from increasing cortical thickness, relative to placebo. After 36 months, cortical mass surface density and thickness had increased by up to 12% at key locations such as the lateral femoral trochanter versus placebo. Most of the femoral cortex displayed a statistically significant relative difference by 36 months. Osteoporotic cortical bone responds rapidly to denosumab therapy, particularly in the hip trochanteric region. This mechanism may be involved in the robust decrease in hip fractures observed in denosumab-treated women at increased risk of fracture.
Collapse
|