1
|
Shinn E, Zahrieh D, DeMichele A, Zdenkowski N, Lemieux J, Mao J, Bjelic-Radisic V, Naughton M, Pfeiler G, Gelmon K, Mayer I, Egle D, Zoppoli G, Traina T, Jiménez MM, Novoa SA, Haddad T, Chan A, Ring AE, Wolff A, Lorenzo JJ, Sabanathan D, Burstein H, Nowecki ZI, Pristauz-Telsnigg G, Brufsky A, Bellet-Ezquerra M, Foukakis T, Novik Y, Rubovszky G, Muehlbacher K, Metzger O, Goulioti T, Law E, Partridge A, Carey L, Zoroufy A, Hlauschek D, Fesl C, Mayer E, Gnant M. Abstract P4-12-01: Adherence with adjuvant endocrine therapy with or without Palbociclib in the PALLAS trial. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p4-12-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: As the development and use of oral anticancer agents increases, it is critical to understand patient adherence to both standard and investigational agents. The open label, phase 3 multicenter PALLAS trial investigates whether adding 2 years of the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib (P) to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) improves invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) over adjuvant ET alone in patients (pts) with HR- positive, HR2-negative, stage II-III breast cancer. Pts were randomly assigned to either Palbociclib (125 mg/day, 3 weeks on, 1 week off, in a 28-day cycle) plus ongoing provider/patient-choice adjuvant ET (P+ET) versus ET alone. We examined patient-reported adherence to ET +/- P during the first two years of study treatment. Methods: Adherence outcomes were measured in English-speaking pts in the U.S., UK, Ireland and Australia, Spanish-speaking pts in Spain and Mexico, and German-speaking pts in Germany and Austria. Adherence measures included drug diaries completed at each cycle, pill counts (for P only) collected at each study visit, and the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-4 item and the McHorney Adherence Estimator questionnaires completed at cycles 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 (22 months). Mean adherence for each cycle was defined as the average proportion of prescribed pills taken (via drug diary) across all patients who initiated that cycle. Persistence was defined as the duration of drug initiation to treatment cessation (via drug diary). Generalized estimating equations were used to model the “most adherent” pts on the Morisky (score = 5 vs score <5) and “low risk” for adherence problems on the McHorney (score=0 vs score >0) to compare the average difference between arms over time for ET, adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical variables. Results: 81% (N=4688) of PALLAS pts were included in this analysis. Median persistence to ET was 23.6 months in P + ET (n=2169), 23.7 months in ET alone (2136) and 20.4 months for P (n=2194). The number of pts who initiated each cycle for ET declined over time and was similar between arms; the decline was more marked for P (Table 1). Mean adherence range as measured by drug diary was 98.2-99.3% for ET in P+ET and 98.0 - 99.4% in ET alone; and for P, ranged from 93.4 - 98.8%. The adherence and persistence results were nearly identical whether measured by drug diary or pill count for P. The observed percent “most adherent” for P measured by the Morisky scale ranged from 71.9% - 79.6% and the percent “low risk” for adherence problems measured by the McHorney scale, 64.0% - 73.4%. The percent of pts “most adherent” and “low risk” for adherence problems to ET was higher, on average over time, in the P+ET group compared to ET alone (75% vs 68%, p<0.01; 75% vs 72%, p=.05, respectively). Conclusions: Self-reported mean adherence for both P + ET and ET alone was strikingly high for pts who remained on therapy; persistence was also high with ET during the 2-year treatment period. Current analyses suggest that nonadherence to either P or ET was likely not a major contributor to the iDFS results seen in the overall PALLAS trial. These results illustrate the importance of measuring and monitoring patient adherence to oral study agents. Support: AFT, Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02513394) and EudraCT (2014-005181-30). https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org
Table 1.Adherence and persistence in PALLAS over the 24 month treatment periodPalbocicilb + ETETPalbociclibETETTreatment cycleMean Adherence (SD)N*Mean Adherence (SD)NMean Adherence (SD)N193.4 (13.8)229098.7 (6.1)230999.0 (5.2)2343294.7 (13.3)218198.8 (6.4)220398.4 (7.1)2206397.4 (10.1)211298.7 (7.3)214298.8 (6.3)2168497.6 (10.2)203598.6 (7.8)211099.0 (5.7)2154597.6 (11.1)197598.3 (7.9)209398.1 (8.3)2148698.1 (8.7)189998.7 (6.6)203798.5 (8.2)2116798.1 (9.3)185599.0 (6.3)201298.6 (7.3)2102898.0 (9.1)181098.2 (8.2)199798.1 (8.2)2092998.4 (7.4)173399.0 (6.4)196298.8 (6.8)20511098.3 (8.6)171499.2 (4.9)194699.0 (5.5)20381198.3 (8.0)169198.5 (7.3)193798.2 (8.2)20311298.7 (6.2)161299.1 (5.3)191098.7 (7.5)19861398.5 (7.7)159698.9 (6.4)189398.8 (7.1)19691497.9 (9.3)157698.4 (7.3)188298.0 (9.1)19611598.5 (6.9)151499.2 (4.6)185499.0 (6.0)19281698.2 (8.7)148699.1 (4.6)183599.1 (5.7)19131798.1 (9.8)147998.3 (7.8)182698.5 (6.4)19031898.7 (6.8)141699.3 (4.1)176899.2 (5.3)18601998.7 (7.3)140899.3 (3.8)175699.4 (3.1)18482098.4 (8.9)139798.9 (5.3)174298.7 (5.8)18382198.5 (7.5)130199.0 (6.1)167698.8 (7.1)17842297.8 (9.7)124698.8 (6.2)164799.2 (5.7)17692398.1 (8.8)118098.2 (8.5)161998.4 (8.0)17552498.8 (7.2)108699.0 (6.3)146898.9 (7.1)16192598.8 (6.7)99699.2 (5.2)143298.8 (7.1)15892697.9 (11.2)84599.1 (5.7)140998.6 (8.8)1578ET=Endocrine therapy * Number of pts who initiated the treatment cycle.
Citation Format: Eileen Shinn, David Zahrieh, Angela DeMichele, Nick Zdenkowski, Julie Lemieux, Jun Mao, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, Michelle Naughton, Georg Pfeiler, Karen Gelmon, Ingrid Mayer, Daniel Egle, Gabriele Zoppoli, Tiffany Traina, Miguel Martin Jiménez, Silvia Antolin Novoa, Tufia Haddad, Arlene Chan, Alistair Edward Ring, Antonio Wolff, Jose JuanPonce Lorenzo, Dhanusha Sabanathan, Hal Burstein, Zbigniew Ireneusz Nowecki, Gunda Pristauz-Telsnigg, Adam Brufsky, Meritxell Bellet-Ezquerra, Theodoros Foukakis, Yelena Novik, Gabor Rubovszky, Karoline Muehlbacher, Otto Metzger, Theodora Goulioti, Ernest Law, Ann Partridge, Lisa Carey, Alex Zoroufy, Dominik Hlauschek, Christian Fesl, Erica Mayer, Michael Gnant. Adherence with adjuvant endocrine therapy with or without Palbociclib in the PALLAS trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-12-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Jun Mao
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center/AFT, New York, NY
| | - Vesna Bjelic-Radisic
- Helios University Clinic Wuppertal, Breast Unit University Witten/Herdecke, Wuppertal, Germany
| | | | - Georg Pfeiler
- Austrian Breast Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria
| | - Karen Gelmon
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Daniel Egle
- Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gabriele Zoppoli
- University Hospital San Martino - National Cancer Institute, Genoa, Italy
| | - Tiffany Traina
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center/AFT, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Arlene Chan
- Breast Cancer Research Centre-WA, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Dhanusha Sabanathan
- Lakeside Specialist Breast Clinic and Nepean Cancer Care Centre, Norwest, NSW, Australia
| | - Hal Burstein
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Alliance, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Adam Brufsky
- University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Otto Metzger
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Alliance, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Lisa Carey
- University of North Carolina/Alliance, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | - Christian Fesl
- Austrian Breast Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria
| | - Erica Mayer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/AFT, Boston, MA
| | - Michael Gnant
- Medical University of Vienna, ABCSG, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Retinoic acid constitutes an active that is already being used extensively in the fight against cutaneous aging. After a period in which certain scientific publications questioned its use, today there is no doubt that retinoic acid continues to be an active with wide possibilities of use when it is formulated and administered correctly. In this work we propose a new formulation that, on the basis of a modern self-emulsifying excipient, incorporates retinoic acid in its composition. The work protocol is structured in the following points of study. Rheological assay: Shear rate, shear stress, viscosity, thixotropy, rheodestruction, and extensibility measurements were carried out. Other pharmacotechnical assays: External appearance, interposition type, and pH control were studied. Dermopharmaceutical effectiveness study: Biophysical non-invasive techniques were applied, according to a standardized work method. The following considerations can be made from the results: the layout of the rheograms could fit, in principle, inside a non-Newtonian-shear-thinning flow behavior, with similar rheodestruction profiles. The hysteresis values, as well as the extensibility indexes that were obtained, determined a good degree of applicability. From the whole of results, we could conclude that the formulation proposed is profiled like an emulsified pharmaceutical form with an excellent cosmetological adaptation, eudermic pH, and soft emollient action, which prohibits the loss of superficial water that maintains the retinoic acid action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Fresno
- Dpto. de Farmacia y Tecnología Farmacéutica, Universidad de Alcalá, 28871-Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|