Abstract P1-13-01: Comparison of 12 weeks neoadjuvant Nab-paclitaxel combined with carboplatinum vs. gemcitabine in triple- negative breast cancer: WSG-ADAPT TN randomized phase II trial

Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) is associated with improved prognosis in TNBC, but optimal chemotherapy remains unclear. Use of weekly nab- paclitaxel (Nab-Pac) vs. conventional paclitaxel and also addition of carboplatinum(Carbo) to anthracycline-taxane(A/T) containing chemotherapy results in significantly higher pCR rates in TNBC with unclear impact on survival and increased toxicity.

The ADAPT study seeks to compare Carbo vs. gemcitabine(Gem) added to nab- paclitaxel as a short 12-week A-free regimen. It also assesses efficacy in early responders vs. non-responders by 3-week proliferation and/or imaging response.

Methods: ADAPT TN compares 12-week neoadjuvant regimens: Carbo vs. Gem combined with Nab-Pac and aims to identify early-response markers for pCR (yPN0 and ypT0/is). TNBC patients (centrally confirmed ER/PR <1%, HER2 neg.), cT1c- cT4c, cN0/+ were randomized to arm A (Nab-Pac 125/Gem 1000 d1,8 q3w) vs. B (Nab-Pac 125/Carbo AUC2 d1,8 q3w). Randomization was stratified by center and nodal status. The trial is powered for pCR comparison by therapy arm and by presence vs. absence of early response markers. Pre-planned interim analysis aimed to identify a dynamic biomarker, e.g. drop of 3-week Ki-67, and to validate trial assumptions.

Results: 336 patients were enrolled from 47 centers between 06/13-02/15 (n=182 ArmA: Nab-Pac/Gem and n=154 ArmB: Nab-Pac/Carbo). 90% and 95% completed therapy according to protocol respectively (n.s.). Median age was 50y. At baseline: A/B: 73% and 74%% had G3 tumors, median Ki-67 of 70% and 75%; 62.6% and 62.9%% had cT2-4c tumors, pN0 status prior to chemotherapy was confirmed in 50.5% and 50%, respectively.

pCR (ypT0/is/ypN0) was A: 28.7% and B: 45.9% (p<0.001). Total pCR (ypT0/ypN0) was A: 25.8% and B: 45.2% respectively (p <0.001).

Nab/Gem arm was associated with significantly higher frequency of dose reductions (20.6% vs. 11.9% (p=0.03), treatment related SAE's (13% vs. 5%, p=0.02), grade 3-4 infections (6.1% vs. 1.3%, p=0.04) and ALAT elevations (11.7 vs. 3.3%, p=0.01) compared to the Nab-Carbo arm.

Within the planned interim analysis (n=130: A/B: 69/61), baseline Ki-67 (Nab- Pac/Carbo arm), age>50 years, and low cellularity (<500 tumor cells and/or Ki-67≤10% in the 3-week biopsy) (Nab-Pac/Gem arm) were positively associated with pCR by logistic regression analysis (separately by therapy arm). In all patients, therapy arm itself was significant for pCR.

Validation of responder definitions for the whole study will be presented at the meeting.

Conclusions:

This is the first large randomized study comparing two short 12-week anthracycline- free regimens in unselected TNBC. Our results suggest superior efficacy and excellent toxicity of Nab-Pac/Carbo vs. Gem. Longer A/T-Carbo containing regimens render quite comparable pCR rates, thus overtreatment by 4xEC in unselected TNBC may be present in some patients. Early response criteria seem to differ according to regimen; their assessment may be impaired by substantial tumor necrosis already after the first therapy cycle.

Citation Format: Gluz O, Nitz U, Liedtke C, Christgen M, Sotlar K, Grischke EM, Forstbauer H, Braun M, Warm M, Hackmann J, Uleer C, Aktas B, Schumacher C, Bangemann N, Lindner C, Kuemmel S, Clemens M, Potenberg J, Staib P, Kohls A, Pelz E, Kates RE, Wuerstlein R, Kreipe HH, Harbeck N. Comparison of 12 weeks neoadjuvant Nab-paclitaxel combined with carboplatinum vs. gemcitabine in triple- negative breast cancer: WSG-ADAPT TN randomized phase II trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-01.

Evaluation of side effects in cancer patients during oncological care: A project of the supportive care group of the tumor center Berlin

e20715

Background: The therapeutic options in tumour treatment protocols include a maximum of tumour cell reduction and at the same time a minimum of side effects in order to secure a good quality of life for the cancer patient. Temporary side effects have been accepted in relation to the benefit risk calculation. A questionnaire for cancer patients was developed to improve the management of side effects of the cancer treatment, to optimize the patient-doctor communication and to register individual problems of the patient. Methods: Cancer patients received a questionnaire with 25 items and were asked for their problems during or after the last tumour specific treatment before having the consultation with the doctor. Gender, age, Karnofsky-index and treatment protocol were additional registered. During September 2007 until December 2007 a total of 272 questionnaires could be collected. The qualitative items have been evaluated with the contigens table method and the parameter free x2 test (Chi-Square-Test). Results: More than 50% of the patients documented additional important points influencing their well being. Nearly all of the evaluated patients had some tumour therapy specific side effects. The most pronounced problem was the physical exhaustion in 71% of the evaluated patients. More than 50% were influenced in their quality of life by more than normal fatigue since the start of their tumour specific therapy. Significant differences could be evaluated in relation to the age, diagnosis and tumour therapy with respect to the symptoms. Conclusions: The questionnaire was be found to be a good method to improve the communication between the patient and the doctor. It was easier to point out individual problems for the patient. The care givers can focus more precisely on important side effects of the tumour specific therapy in order to improve the quality of life of the treated patient.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Therapy of metastatic breast cancer with humanized antibodies against the HER2 receptor protein

The HER2 protein, a member of the epidermal growth factor family, is encoded by the protooncogene c-erbB-2. Its overexpression, occurring in approximately one-third of all breast carcinomas, is associated with a poor prognosis. A humanized mouse antibody against HER2 has been developed by genetic engineering. Here an unspecific human IgG was connected to the recognizing mouse IgG fragment. The allergization typical for allogeneic antibodies does not take place in this context. The effectiveness of this antibody has been confirmed by two international prospective phase III trials that tested it alone and combined with chemotherapy. Both modes of application increased the response rates and the time to progression. Side-effects were rare except for a high rate of cardiac dysfunction when the antibody was combined with anthracyclines. The effectiveness and negligible side-effects of the chimeric antibody against HER2 (Herceptin) render it a valuable tool in the treatment of breast cancer.