Five waves of COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: results of a national survey evaluating the impact on activities related to arrhythmias, pacing, and electrophysiology promoted by AIAC (Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing)

BACKGROUND

The subsequent waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy had a major impact on cardiac care.

METHODS

A survey to evaluate the dynamic changes in arrhythmia care during the first five waves of COVID-19 in Italy (first: March-May 2020; second: October 2020-January 2021; third: February-May 2021; fourth: June-October 2021; fifth: November 2021-February 2022) was launched.

RESULTS

A total of 127 physicians from arrhythmia centers (34% of Italian centers) took part in the survey. As compared to 2019, a reduction in 40% of elective pacemaker (PM), defibrillators (ICD), and cardiac resynchronization devices (CRT) implantations, with a 70% reduction for ablations, was reported during the first wave, with a progressive and gradual return to pre-pandemic volumes, generally during the third-fourth waves, slower for ablations. For emergency procedures (PM, ICD, CRT, and ablations), recovery from the initial 10% decline occurred in most cases during the second wave, with some variability. However, acute care for atrial fibrillation, electrical cardioversions, and evaluations for syncope showed a prolonged reduction of activity. The number of patients with devices which started remote monitoring increased by 40% during the first wave, but then the adoption of remote monitoring declined.

CONCLUSIONS

The dramatic and profound derangement in arrhythmia management that characterized the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic was followed by a progressive return to the volume of activities of the pre-pandemic periods, even if with different temporal dynamics and some heterogeneity. Remote monitoring was largely implemented during the first wave, but full implementation is needed.

High-definition electro-anatomical mapping of Koch’s Triangle including AV node potentials recordings in consecutive AVNRT patients

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Activation mapping of Koch’s Triangle, even when coupled with high density mapping, is incomplete without recordings of AV nodal electrical activity.

Purpose

To identify, through a highly specific methodology and high-density electro-anatomical mapping (HDM), the slow AVN potential (AVNP) and the precise activation modality of Koch’s Triangle in SR in atrio-ventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) patients.

Method

The 3D KT geometry was created from the Orion mapping and the Rhythmia Mapping System. KT was divided into 8 distinct regions moving from an antero-septal to postero-septal areas and bounded by tricuspid annulus (TA) anteriorly and tendon of Todaro posteriorly. AV nodal potential activity was recorded by non-standard bipolar electrogram filtering at 0.50–300 Hz. The AVNP was defined as a slow frequency potential between atrial and ventricular EGM similar to that reported by Scherlag and Jackman, and it was confirmed by high frequency atrial pacing. The AVNP was annotated at the end of electrogram when it was followed in the same recording by a sharp potential; otherwise it was annotated at the center. Data are reported as mean±SD.

Results

Twenty successful SP ablation cases of typical AVNRT from 7 centers were included. RA acquired points during SR were 2512±1400 (123±67 acquired inside the KT, KT area of 41±64 mm2). The time of a complete RA mapping was 19.2±8 min. The AVNP was detected in all cases (n=20, 100%). At the mid-region of the KT, AVNP was identified in 20 (100%) cases; at postero-septal regions bounded anteriorly by the TA and posteriorly by the lateral wall toward the crista terminalis AVN was present in 17 (85%) cases; at mid-postero-septal regions AVN was detected in 15 (75%) cases. In all patients, the first activation in the KT was recorded in the antero-septal region at the expected site of the fast pathway; then the wavefront spread in two directions: anteriorly toward the His-bundle and posteriorly toward the base of KT colliding with the wavefront coming from the opposite direction through the slow pathway. In all patients, abolition of the SP and acute procedural success was achieved in the first procedure with 5.4±3 RF ablations. In 30 out 35 (86%) ablation sites, ablations were done at sites with concurrent detectable AVNP. No complications occurred.

Conclusions

High-density mapping using a non-standard bipolar electrograms filtering at 0.50–300 Hz showed multiple electrograms in SR including low frequency potential that may represent the electrical activity of compact node and inferior extensions.

Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) Italian Registry: preliminary analysis

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Introduction

Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy is a treatment option for patients suffering symptomatic Chronic Heart Failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) despite optimal medical therapy (OMT) [1]. CCM, by delivering high-output electrical impulses during ventricular absolute refractory period, increases the activity of proteins involved in intracellular calcium handling. This therapy has been associated with improvement in quality of life (QoL) and reduction of HF-hospitalizations [2,3]. Our aim is to present preliminary data from the CCM Italian Registry.

Methods

The CCM Italian Registry is a prospective, observational, multicentre study investigating the long-term impact of CCM therapy in HF patients on LVEF, Minnesota Living With HF Questionnaire (MLWHFQ) and 6-minutes walking test (6MWT) [4]. Preliminary results after one year of follow-up have been analysed in this abstract. Data are expressed as median and interquartile range. Changes from baseline have been tested with Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results

A total of 42 patients suffering HF, with LVEF<45%, NYHA class>II despite OMT, have been enrolled and implanted with CCM device in 10 Centres. Most of patients were male (41 patients, 98%), with a median age of 76 years (70-79). The most frequent aetiology was ischemic (29 patients, 69%) and 32 (79%) had another implanted device (24 ICD, 8 CRT-D). Twelve (29%) patients presented chronic atrial fibrillation (AF). Thirty-eight (90%) patients were treated with beta-blockers and 32 (76%) received sacubitril/valsartan (15) or ACE-inhibitors (17). A significant reduction in HF-related hospitalization has been observed after 6 and 12 months of CCM therapy, compared to the incidence in the 12 months before CCM implantation (Figure 1), with a relative risk reduction of 75% at 12 months (p<0.001). As shown in Figure 2, LVEF significantly improved both at 6 and 12-month follow up (p=0.042 and p=0.004, respectively), as well as MLWHFQ score (p=0.001 and p=0.032, respectively). The 6MWT distance did not show significant changes (6-month, p=0.252 and 12-month, p=0.281), mainly due to physical limitations in some patients. NYHA class improved significantly both at 6 (p=0.001) and 12-months (p=0.012), with 80% of patients showing an improvement of at least 1 class compared to baseline. After stratifying by HF aetiology, LVEF at 12-months improved significantly in non-ischaemic HF (p=0.028), while in patients with ischaemic aetiology improved significantly at 6-months (p=0.0416) but not at 12-months (p=0.135).

Conclusion

CCM proved to be effective in improving symptoms, QoL and in reducing CHF-hospitalizations in patients with symptomatic CHF with reduced LVEF despite OMT. This prospective Italian Registry will be fundamental to gather more evidence, to assess the long-term effect of CCM, and also to measure the impact of CCM therapy in the Italian clinical practice.

Minimal fluoroscopic approaches and factors associated with radiation dose when high-definition mapping is used for supraventricular tachycardia ablation: insight from the CHARISMA registry

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Limited data exist on factors associated with radiation exposure during ablation procedures when a high definition mapping technology is used.

Purpose

To report factors associated with radiation exposure and data on feasibility and safety of a minimal fluoroscopic approach using the Rhythmia mapping system in supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) ablation procedures.

Methods

Consecutive patients indicated for arrhythmia ablation were enrolled in the CHARISMA study at 12 centers. We included in this analysis consecutive right-side procedures performed through a minimal fluoroscopy approach with the Rhythmia mapping system were analyzed. A 3D geometry of chambers of interest was reconstructed on the basis of the electroanatomic information taken from the mapping system. Fluoroscopy was used only if deemed necessary. The effective dose (ED) was calculated using accepted formula. For our purpose high dose exposure was defined as an ED greater than the median value of ED of the population exposed to radiation.

Results

This analysis included 325 patients (mean age = 56 ± 17 years, 57% male) undergoing SVT procedures (152 AVNRT, 116 AFL, 41 AP and 16 AT). During the study, 27481 seconds of fluoroscopy was used (84.6 ± 224 seconds per procedure), resulting in a mean equivalent ED of 1.1 ± 3.7 mSv per patient. The mean reconstructed RA volume was 99 ± 54 ml in a mean mapping time of 12.2 ± 7 min. The mean number of radiofrequency ablations (RFC) to terminate each arrhythmia was 9.4 ± 9 (mean RFC delivery time equal to 6.7 ± 6 min). 192 procedures (59.1%) were completed without any use of fluoroscopy; during the remaining 133 procedures (39.9%), 206.6 ± 313.4 seconds of fluoroscopy was used (median ED = 1.2 mSv). In a minority of the cases (n = 25, 7.7%) the fluoroscopy time was higher than 5 minutes (median ED = 6.5 mSv), whereas radiologic exposure time greater than 1 minute occurred in ninety cases (27.7%, median ED = 2.1 mSv). On multivariate logistic analysis adjusted for baseline confounders the RFC application time (OR = 1.0014, 95%CI: 1.0007 to 1.0022; p = 0.0001) was independently associated to an ED greater than 1.2 mSv, whereas female gender had an inverse association (0.54, 0.29 to 0.98; p = 0.0435). Acute success was reached in 97.8% of the cases. During a mean of 290.7 ± 169.6 days follow-up, no major adverse events related to the procedure were reported. Overall, the recurrence rate of the primary arrhythmia during follow-up was 2.5%.

Conclusions

In our experience, arrhythmias ablation through minimal fluoroscopy approach with the use of a novel ablation technology is safe, feasible, and effective in common right atrial arrhythmias. High-dose exposure occurred in a very limited number of cases, without any reduction of the safety and acute and long-term effectiveness profile.

Minimal fluoroscopy approach in current clinical practice with a novel ablation technology for supraventricular tachycardia: a large multicenter experience from an Italian registry

Background

Electrophysiological studies and ablation procedures expose both physicians and patients to a large amount of radiation. Most of 3-D mapping systems provide improved tracking of catheters, possibly allowing relevant reductions in radiation exposure. No data exists on the ability of the Rhythmia mapping system to minimize fluoroscopy time and dose.

Purpose

To report preliminary data on feasibility and safety of a minimal fluoroscopic approach using the Rhythmia mapping system in supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) procedures.

Methods

Consecutive patients indicated for arrhythmia ablation were enrolled in the CHARISMA study at 12 centers. For our purpose consecutive right-side procedures performed through a minimal fluoroscopy approach with the Rhythmia mapping system were analyzed. A 3D geometry of chambers of interest was reconstructed on the basis of the electroanatomic information taken from the mapping system. Fluoroscopy was used only if deemed necessary.

Results

This analysis included 266 patients (mean age = 57±17 years, 57% male) undergoing SVT procedures (120 AVNRT, 91 AFL, 32 AP, 11 AT and 12 other right atrial procedures). In all cases, diagnostic EP and ablation catheters were positioned using a low fluoroscopic electroanatomic guided approach. The mean fluoroscopy time needed for each procedure was 55±128 s. The median reconstructed RA volume was 92 [63–131] ml in a median mapping time of 11 [7–17] min. The median number of radiofrequency ablations to terminate each arrhythmia was 6 [3–12] (total RF delivery time of 291 [180–505] s). Sixty-five percent of the procedures (n=174) were completed with less than 10 s of fluoroscopy. Low fluoroscopy approach with less than 10 s (minimal fluoroscopy approach) was most frequently obtained in case of AVNRT (91, 76%) compared to other arrhythmias' ablation (83, 57%, p=0.001) Achievement of a minimal fluoroscopic approach was not affected by operator's experience (65% vs 66%, p=1.00, respectively within physician with more or less of 10 years of active practice), whereas it was affected by presence of a fellow in training during the procedure (72% without fellow vs 26% with fellow, p<0.0001). A 100% rate of acute success was observed, and no procedure-related complications occurred. At multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for baseline confounders, both the total number of RF ablations (OR: 0.93 (95% CI:0.88 to 0.96; p=0.0053) and the presence of a fellow in training during the procedure (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.87; p=0.0278) had an inverse association to the achievement of a minimal fluoroscopic approach.

Conclusions

In our preliminary experience, arrhythmias' ablation through minimal fluoroscopy approach with the use of a novel ablation technology seems to be safe, feasible, and effective in common right atrial arrhythmias. Use of fluoroscopy can be dramatically reduced in most cases, without any reduction of the safety and acute effectiveness profile.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

P529Efficacy and safety of S-ICD implantation without use of defibrillation threshold testing: a retrospective multicentric observational study

Introduction

The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) is a valid alternative to transvenous systems (TV-ICD) for the treatment of life-threatening arrhythmias, and the extravascular position of the lead allows a significant reduction of the risk of infection. Current guidelines recommend defibrillation threshold testing (DFT) at the time of S-ICD implantation (class I). Although randomised trials have proven the safety of TV-ICD implantation with no DFT, it is unclear whether such an approach could be adopted for S-ICD as well. The PRAETORIAN score, based on post-implantation chest X-ray, can accurately predict a high defibrillation threshold after S-ICD implantation. The aim of this retrospective multicentre study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-ICD implantation with no DFT.

Methods

We enrolled 203 consecutive patients undergoing S-ICD implantation in six different centres between October 2012 and January 2019. It was left at discretion of the operator whether performing or not DFT at the time of the procedure. Baseline device settings were collected, and the PRAETORIAN score was retrospectively calculated whenever chest X-ray was available. Both remote or in-clinic device interrogation reports were systemically analysed, and all the shocks and arrhythmia episodes identified. All the patients provided consent form and ethical approval was obtained.

Results

The population (mean age 57.6 ± 14.2) was divided in two groups, based on whether DFT was performed at the time of the S-ICD implantation: 72 patients (35.4%) underwent DFT (DFT+ group), while 131 patients (64.5%) did not (DFT- group). In the DFT- group, mean LVEF was lower (32 ± 8% vs 42 ± 17%, p < 0.0001) and prevalence of diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation higher compared to the DFT+ group (27.5% vs 13.9%, p = 0.04 and 38.9% vs 19.44%, p = 0.007; respectively). In addition, the indication for S-ICD was more frequently primary prevention in the DFT- vs DFT+ group (70.8% vs 90.8%, p = 0.0004; respectively). No differences in terms of device programming were identified between the two cohorts. The PRAETORIAN score was significantly higher in the DFT- vs DFT+ patients (50 ± 26 vs 36 ± 18, p = 0.032; respectively). After a median follow-up of … months, we observed 5 appropriate shocks in 3 patients from the DFT+ group vs. 15 shocks in 8 patients from the DFT- group (p = 0.81). All the life-threatening arrhythmias were successfully recognised and treated by the device. DFT was complicated by pulseless electrical activity in one patient. One patient in the DFT- group suffered from an episode of ventricular tachycardia requiring a total of 4 shocks for being terminated. Six patients in the DFT- group died for non-arrhythmic causes. On the Kaplan-Meier analysis, cumulative survival was comparable between the two groups (log rank p value = 0.13).

Conclusions

This study suggests that implantation of S-ICD with no DFT might be reasonable. These results should be confirmed in prospective randomised trials.

P1452Low fluoroscopy approach with a novel ablation technology in right side procedures: a large multicenter experience from the CHARISMA registry

Funding Acknowledgements

NO FUNDING

Background

Electrophysiological studies and ablation procedures expose both physicians and patients to a significant amount of radiation. Nowadays, most of 3-D mapping systems allow for improved tracking of catheters with possible reduction in radiation exposure. No data exists on the ability to minimize fluoroscopy time and dose while using the Rhythmia mapping system.

Purpose

To report preliminary data on feasibility and safety of a low fluoroscopic approach using the Rhythmia mapping system in SVT procedures.

Methods

The CHARISMA study is a non-randomized, multicenter, prospective study in which consecutive patients indicated for arrhythmia were enrolled. For our purpose consecutive right-side procedures performed through a low fluoroscopy approach with the Rhythmia mapping system were analyzed. The mapping system was used to create the 3D geometry of chambers of interest and anatomic reference points and to visualize the catheters from the beginning to the end of the procedure. Fluoroscopy was used only if deemed necessary.

Results

204 unselected consecutive cases of SVT from 11 centers were included in the study (mean age = 55 ± 18 years, 53% male, 85 AVNRT, 75 AFL, 28 AP, 9 AT and 7 other right atrial procedures). In all the cases, diagnostic EP and ablation catheters were positioned using only the low fluoroscopic guided mapping approach. During the study, a total of 7157 s of fluoroscopy was needed in 204 patients (51 ± 137 s per procedure). One hundred fourty-one procedures (69%) were completed with less than 10 seconds of fluoroscopy, whereas in 169 (83%) of the cases the fluoroscopy time was lower than 60 seconds. Low fluoroscopy approach with less than 10 seconds was less frequently obtained in case of AFL (46, 61.3%) compared to AVNRT ablation (65, 76.5%, p = 0.041) whereas no differences were found comparing with AP (21, 75%, p = 0.248). The median reconstructed RA volume was 94[65-133] ml in a median mapping time of 11 [6-16] min. The median number of radiofrequency ablations to terminate each arrhythmia was 5 [3-12] (total RF delivery time of 293 [180-505] sec). A 100% rate of acute success was observed in our case series. No complications occurred.

Conclusions

In our preliminary experience, arrhythmias ablation through low fluoroscopy approach and the use of a novel ablation technology seems to be safe, feasible, and effective in common right atrial arrhythmias. Use of fluoroscopy can be nearly avoided in most cases, without any reduction of the safety and effectiveness profile.