Impact of interstitial lung disease on clinical remission and unfavourable events of rheumatoid arthritis: results from the IORRA cohort

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to examine the impact of concomitant interstitial lung disease (ILD) on achieving clinical remission and the occurrence of unfavourable clinical events in patients with RA.

METHODS

Among the participants in the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) cohort from 2011 to 2012, patients not achieving remission of 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) at baseline and those with chest CT images were enrolled. Based on the chest CT images, the patients were divided into two groups: the ILD group and non-ILD group. The associations among the presence of ILD with time to achieving DAS28 remission and development of death, hospitalized infection, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), or malignancy within 5 years were evaluated using time-dependent Cox regression models.

RESULTS

We enrolled 287 patients in the ILD group and 1235 in the non-ILD group. DAS28 remission was achieved at least once in 55.7% and 75.0% of the ILD and non-ILD groups within 5 years, respectively. Presence of ILD was significantly associated with failure to achieve DAS28 remission (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.58, 0.89). ILD was also a significant factor associated with death (aHR: 3.24; 95% CI: 2.08, 5.03), hospitalized infection (aHR 2.60; 95% CI: 1.77, 3.83), MACE (aHR: 3.40; 95% CI: 1.76, 6.58), and lung cancer (aHR: 16.0; 95% CI: 3.22, 79.2), but not with malignant lymphoma (aHR: 2.27; 95% CI: 0.59, 8.81).

CONCLUSION

Concomitant ILD was a significant factor associated with failure to achieve clinical remission and the occurrence of the unfavourable clinical events in patients with RA.

Unincreased mortality of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis compared to the general population in the past 17 years: Analyses from the IORRA cohort

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this article is to investigate the mortality rate of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over the past 17 years.

METHODS

Japanese patients with early RA enrolled in the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis cohort from 2001 to 2012 were classified into Groups A (2001-06) and B (2007-12). The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) and 5-year survival rate were calculated.

RESULTS

Groups A and B had 1609 and 1608 patients, of which 167 and 178 patients were lost during follow-up and 47 and 45 deaths were confirmed, respectively. The SMR (95% confidence intervals) for Groups A and B were 0.81 (0.59-1.08) and 0.78 (0.57-1.04), respectively, with the condition that all untraceable patients were alive. Assuming that the mortality rate of untraceable patients was twice as high as that of the general population, the SMR was 0.90 (0.68-1.19) for Group A and 0.92 (0.68-1.23) for Group B. The 5-year survival rates were 96.9% and 97.0% for Groups A and B, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5-year mortality of patients with early RA has been comparable to that of the general Japanese population. The 5-year survival rate has been stable over the past 17 years.

Evaluation of RABBIT risk score in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis starting first bDMARDs: a validation study using the IORRA cohort data

OBJECTIVE

To examine the ability of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Observation of Biologic Therapy (RABBIT) risk score to predict the occurrence of serious infections in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), after initiating their first biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD).

METHODS

We used data from the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) cohort from 2008 to 2020. Patients with RA who were started on their first bDMARDs were included. Those with missing data required to calculate the score were excluded. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the discriminatory ability of the RABBIT score.

RESULTS

A total of 1,081 patients were enrolled. During the one-year observational period, 23 (1.7%) patients had serious infections; the most frequent one was bacterial pneumonia (n=11, 44%). The median RABBIT score in the serious infection group was significantly higher than that in the non-serious infection group (2.3 [1.5-5.4] vs 1.6 [1.2-2.5], p<0.001). The area under the ROC curve for the occurrence of serious infections was 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.52-0.79), suggesting that the score had low accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Our present study revealed that the RABBIT risk score did not have sufficient discriminatory ability for predicting the development of severe infections in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis after initiating their first bDMARD.

Cost-consequence of abatacept as first-line therapy in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients using IORRA real-world data

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the cost-effectiveness of abatacept (ABA) as first-line (1L) therapy in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients using data from the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis database.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model was used to estimate the cost per American College of Rheumatology response of at least 50% improvement (ACR50) responder and per patient in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission from a Japanese healthcare payers' perspective over a 2-year time horizon. Clinical characteristics of patients on ABA-1L were matched with those of patients on ABA second or later line (2L+) or tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi)-1L directly or using propensity scores. Resource utilisation and medical costs were calculated from the Japan Medical Data Center claims database. Parameter uncertainty was addressed by sensitivity and subgroup analyses (age, treatment duration, Japanese version of Health Assessment Questionnaire [J-HAQ] score).

RESULTS

Incremental costs per member per month (ΔPMPM) for ABA-1L versus TNFi-1L and ABA-2L+ were -1,571 Japanese Yen (JPY) and 81 JPY, respectively. For ABA-1L versus TNFi-1L, ΔPMPM by ACR50 response was -11,715 JPY and by CDAI and SDAI remission 11,602 JPY and 47,003 JPY, respectively. Corresponding costs for ABA-1L were lower for all outcome parameters versus those for ABA-2L+. Scenario analyses showed that ABA-1L was cost-effective over TNFi-1L in patients <65 years for any outcome. Furthermore, ABA-1L was cost-effective over ABA-2L+ for all outcomes in patients with age <65 years, disease duration <5 years and J-HAQ ≥1.5.

CONCLUSIONS

ABA-1L demonstrated a favourable cost-effectiveness profile in RA patients, accruing savings for the Japanese healthcare payers.

Trends in Risks of Malignancies in Japanese Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Analyses from a 14-year Observation of the IORRA Cohort

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the trends in risks of overall and site-specific malignancies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Among Japanese patients with RA enrolled in the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) cohort, all malignancies that occurred from 2000 to 2013 were extracted. The standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall and site-specific malignancies were calculated during three periods: pre-biologics, 2000-2004; early biologics, 2005-2009; and recent biologics, 2010-2013. Risk factors for overall and specific malignancies were analyzed using time-dependent Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Among 11,299 patients with RA (68,483 person-years), 507 malignancies were confirmed. Similar risks were observed versus the general Japanese population for overall malignancies throughout the three periods, with SIRs (95% CIs) of 0.96 (0.80-1.14) in the pre-biologics period, 0.95 (0.82-1.09) in the early biologics period, and 0.87 (0.75-1.01) in the recent biologics period. Significant increased risk for malignant lymphoma was observed throughout the observation period (SIR 4.61, 95% CI 3.58-5.85). The disease activity was a significant risk factor for overall malignancies and lung cancer.

CONCLUSION

Despite the expanding use of methotrexate and biologics, there were no increases in malignancy risk in Japanese patients with RA.

AB0332 EVALUATION OF THE RABBIT RISK SCORE IN JAPANESE PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS NEWLY TREATED WITH BIOLOGIC DMARDS: DATA FROM THE IORRA COHORT

Background

Serious infection is one of the most critical adverse events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). During the first year, infections occur more frequently. Therefore, estimating the risk of developing a serious infection is important for the safe use of bDMARDs. The Rheumatoid Arthritis Observation of Biologic Therapy (RABBIT) risk score predicted the incidence rate of serious infection during 1 year in patients with RA taking DMARDs. Moreover, it has been validated using data from various observational cohort studies and nationwide registries with favorable results, with a reported area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.68–0.871–5. However, the RABBIT risk score has not been validated in RA patients starting a first bDMARD.

Objectives

To investigate the discriminatory ability of the RABBIT risk score for predicting the development of serious infection during 1 year after starting first bDMARDs in Japanese patients with RA using data from the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) cohort.

Methods

The IORRA cohort is a large observational cohort at the Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University. Japanese patients with RA visiting our institute were registered and clinical parameters were assessed biannually. This study enrolled patients with RA who were registered in the IORRA cohort and treated with a first bDMARD. Patients who were missing data needed to calculate the RABBIT risk score were excluded. The RABBIT risk score was calculated using the patient’s age, comorbidities, Japanese-Health Assessment Questionnaire score, history of previous infections, and types of DMARDs used. Serious infections were defined as those requiring hospitalization or treatment with intravenous antibiotics. The occurrence of serious infection during 1 year after starting the first bDMARDs was identified using data from the biannual IORRA cohort and confirmed using medical records. The discriminatory ability of the RABBIT risk score was analyzed by the AUROC.

Results

A total of 1,081 patients with RA and a median age of 55.3 years, in which females were the majority (88.2%), were included. Serious infection occurred in eight patients during 1 year before starting their first bDMARDs. The number of patients starting a TNF inhibitor, IL-6 inhibitor, and abatacept were 830 (76.8%), 170 (15.7%), and 81 (7.5%), respectively. A total of 23 patients (1.7%) had serious infections during 1 year after starting the first bDMARD; the most frequent infection was pneumonia (n=16, 69.6%). The median RABBIT score was 2.3 (IQR 1.6–5.4) in patients with serious infections during the follow-up period, and 1.6 (IQR 1.2–2.5) in patients without serious infections. The discriminatory ability of the RABBIT risk score was slightly poor, with an AUROC of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.52– 0.79).

Conclusion

The RABBIT risk score is highly practical; however, our present study suggested that some adjustments may be required to predict the risk of serious infection in Japanese patients with RA starting a first bDMARD.

Figure 1.

ROC curve of serious infection and RABBIT score with an AUROC of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.52– 0.79).

Disclosure of Interests

Tomoaki Higuchi: None declared, Eiichi Tanaka Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Asahi Kasei pharma co., Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Eisai Pharmaceutical, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., and UCB Pharma., Paid instructor for: Abbvie, Asahi Kasei pharma co., Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Eisai Pharmaceutical, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., and UCB Pharma., Eisuke Inoue Speakers bureau: Bristol-Meyers and Pfizer, Consultant of: Nippontect systems, Mai Abe: None declared, Kumiko Saka: None declared, Eri Sugano: None declared, Naohiro Sugitani: None declared, Yoko Shimizu: None declared, Moeko Ochiai: None declared, Rei Yamaguchi: None declared, Katsunori Ikari Speakers bureau: Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp., Astellas Pharma Inc., AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Kaken Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp. Pfizer Japan Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Teijin Pharma Ltd and UCB Japan Co. Ltd., Yamanaka Hisashi: None declared, Masayoshi Harigai Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan, Ayumi, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan, GlaxoSmithKline, Kissei, Pfizer Japan Inc, Takeda, Teijin, Consultant of: AbbVie Japan, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kissei, Teijin, Grant/research support from: AbbVie Japan, Asahi Kasei, Astellas, Ayumi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Kissei, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Nippon Kayaku, Sekiui Medical, Shionogi, Taisho, Takeda, Teijin.

Impact of Concomitant Chronic Kidney Disease on Hospitalized Infections and Remission in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from the IORRA Cohort

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD) on unfavourable clinical events and remission in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We included 5,103 patients with RA with CKD from the Institute of Rheumatology Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) cohort in 2012. CKD stages were classified into four groups: CKD with normal eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and proteinuria; mild CKD, eGFR ≥45-<60; moderate CKD, eGFR ≥30-<45; and severe CKD, eGFR <30. We assessed the association between concomitant CKD and the occurrence of unfavourable clinical events or achieving remission during a 5-year observational period.

RESULTS

Of the 5,103 patients with RA, 686 (86.6%) had CKD. Concomitant CKD was associated with hospitalized infections (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-2.13, p=0.02), especially in the moderate to severe CKD group (aHR 1.93, 95% CI 1.12-3.13, p=0.02). Of all subjects, 2,407 (47.2%) had active RA at baseline and 401 (16.7%) had CKD. Concomitant CKD was also associated with failure of achieving remission (aHR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99, p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Concomitant CKD was a risk factor for hospitalized infections in Japanese patients with RA and failure of achieving remission in patients with active RA.

Risk of herpes zoster in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the biologics era from 2011 to 2015 and its association with methotrexate, biologics, and corticosteroids

OBJECTIVES

To elucidate the incidence and risk factors of herpes zoster (HZ) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the biologics era.

METHODS

We determined the rate of HZ occurrence among the RA patients that participated in the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis surveys from 2011 to 2015, by assessing medical records. The standardised incidence rate per 1000 patient-years with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated, and risk factors for HZ were analysed using a time-dependent Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among 7815 patients (female, 84.7%) contributing to 25,863 patient-years of observation, 340 HZ events in 309 patients were confirmed. The standardised incidence rate (95% CI) per 1000 patient-years was 8.5 (6.9-10.5) in total, 6.0 (3.7-9.2) in men, and 11.0 (8.7-13.7) in women. Risk factors for HZ were age per 10 years (hazard ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.26, p < .05), Japanese version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ) score of 0.5-1.5 (versus J-HAQ = 0; 1.51, 1.09-2.10, p < .05), methotrexate use (1.58, 1.06-2.36, p < .05), and biologic use (1.88, 1.44-2.47, p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

In the era when biologics were frequently used and corticosteroid use and doses were decreasing, methotrexate and biologics increased the risk for HZ.

Differences in patients' population and efficacy/effectiveness of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs between randomized controlled trials and real-world settings in patients with rheumatoid arthritis - using the IORRA cohort

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the differences in patients' population and efficacy/effectiveness of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) between randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical practice in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

We reviewed inclusion criteria in Phase II or III RCTs of bDMARDs conducted in Japan. The Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis study participants during the period when each RCT was conducted (Cohort A) and new bDMARD users at our institute in 2016 (Cohort B) were assessed for the fulfilment of the inclusion criteria. The effectiveness of bDMARDs in our cohort and their efficacy in RCTs were compared using the inverse-variance method.

RESULTS

Nineteen RCTs were selected. The mean proportions of patients fulfilling all inclusion criteria of each RCT in Cohorts A and B were 2.3% and 7.6%, respectively. The pooled proportion ratios (95% confidence interval) for achieving the American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20), ACR50, ACR70, and disease activity score 28 remission in non-eligible cases for eight RCTs versus all corresponding RCTs were 0.38 (0.30-0.51), 0.41 (0.30-0.57), 0.54 (0.35-0.82), and 1.28 (1.10-1.56), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Few rheumatoid arthritis patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the RCTs in clinical settings. There was a difference in the efficacy/effectiveness of bDMARDs between RCTs and clinical practice.

OP0187 INCIDENCE OF MALIGNANCY IN JAPANESE PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: DATA FROM THE JAPANESE IORRA PATIENT REGISTRY

Background:

The risk of some types of malignancy is increased in patients (pts) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), compared with the general population. We have previously reported the incidence of malignancy in Japanese pts with RA.1-4

Objectives:

This analysis further evaluated the incidence of malignancy in Japanese pts with RA using recent data from the large prospective observational study, IORRA.

Methods:

This analysis included all pts with RA aged ≥18 years who were enrolled in IORRA from April 2013 to October 2018, with follow-up through October 2019, and participated in ≥2 surveys. Index was defined as the date of the first entry in the IORRA database, with baseline defined as the 6-month period prior to the index date. Malignancies were identified in pt reports of biannual IORRA surveys and confirmed using medical records. Age- and sex-standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results:

In total, 8020 pts were included. At baseline, the majority (85.0%) of pts were female; mean disease duration was 12.8 years, 5.8% and 4.8% of pts had a past history of malignancy or comorbid malignancy at baseline, respectively, and the majority (75.9%) of pts were receiving methotrexate (Table). The SIR (95% CI) was 0.90 (0.80, 1.01). SIRs (95% CI) of site-specific malignancies were: breast cancer, 0.91 (0.69, 1.18); lung cancer, 0.67 (0.44, 0.97); colon cancer, 0.93 (0.62, 1.32); stomach cancer, 0.82 (0.56, 1.14); and lymphoma, 3.74 (2.73, 4.96).

Table 1.

Patient demographics and baseline disease characteristics

Patients with RA (N=8020)Age (years), mean (SD)59.3 (13.8)Female, n (%)6816 (85.0)Duration of RA (years), mean (SD)12.8 (10.3)Never smoked, n (%)5086 (66.2)DAS28, mean (SD)2.8 (1.1)J-HAQ, mean (SD)0.60 (0.72)Malignancy status, n (%)Past history of malignancy467 (5.8)Comorbid malignancy at baseline386 (4.8)Medication use, n (%)MTX6088 (75.9)Tacrolimus787 (9.8)Corticosteroids2641 (32.9)bDMARD use1508 (18.8)TNFi1163 (14.5)Tocilizumab311 (3.9)Abatacept106 (1.3)JAK inhibitors4 (0.05)

bDMARD, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; DAS28, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints; JAK, Janus kinase; J-HAQ, Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire; MTX, methotrexate; N, the number of patients included in the analysis, the number of patients assessed for each characteristic may be fewer than N; n, the number of patients with each characteristic; SD, standard deviation; TNFi, tumour necrosis factor inhibitor

Conclusion:

Overall risk of malignancy was similar to that in the general Japanese population, although a significantly higher risk of lymphoma was identified.

References:

[1]Sugimoto et al. Rheumatol Int 2017; 37: 1871-1878.

[2]Shimizu et al. Clin Rheumatol 2017; 36: 1237-1245.

[3]Askling et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75: 1789-1796.

[4]Yamada et al. Rheumatol Int 2011; 31: 1487-1492.

Acknowledgements:

Study sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Medical writing support was provided by Anthony G McCluskey, CMC Connect, and funded by Pfizer Inc.

Disclosure of Interests:

masayoshi harigai Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan, Ayumi, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan, GlaxoSmithKline, Kissei, Pfizer Japan Inc, Takeda, Teijin, Consultant of: AbbVie Japan, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kissei, Teijin, Grant/research support from: AbbVie Japan, Asahi Kasei, Astellas, Ayumi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Kissei, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Nippon Kayaku, Sekiui Medical, Shionogi, Taisho, Takeda, Teijin, Naohiro Sugitani: None declared, Ryoko Sakai Speakers bureau: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisuke Inoue Speakers bureau: Pfizer Japan Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Michika MOCHIZUKI Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, Shigeyuki Toyoizumi Employee of: Pfizer R&D Japan, Noritoshi Yoshii Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, Naonobu Sugiyama Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, Eiichi Tanaka Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan, Asahi Kasei, Astellas, Ayumi, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan, GlaxoSmithKline, Kyowa, Janssen, Mochida, Pfizer Japan Inc, Takeda, Teijin, Hisashi Yamanaka Speakers bureau: Astellas, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Pfizer Inc, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Teijin, YLBio, Consultant of: Corrona, LLC

Successful discontinuation of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in real-world settings

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the proportion of successful biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) discontinuation and related factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical settings.

METHODS

Among 1775 RA patients who started bDMARDs between 2003 and 2012, 43 patients with DAS28-ESR <3.2 at the time of bDMARD discontinuation were extracted. Patients were divided into two groups (bio-free success: BS and bio-free failure: BF groups) based on bDMARD usage and disease activity 1 year after discontinuation. We evaluated the proportion of bio-free success and assessed factors related to bio-free success.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (58.1%: BS group) maintained discontinuation of bDMARDs and DAS28-ESR <3.2 at 1 year after discontinuation. The median DAS28-ESR at bDMARD initiation was lower in the BS group than in the BF group (3.95 vs 5.04; p = .04). The BS group experienced a larger decrease in average glucocorticoid (GC) dose during bDMARD use than the BF group (-3.0 mg/day vs 0 mg/day; p = .01).

CONCLUSION

bDMARDs were discontinued without flare up of RA in 58.1% of patients with RA in clinical settings. A lower DAS28-ESR at initiation and reduction of GC dose before discontinuation of bDMARD were important factors associated with bio-free success.

THU0144 DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF PREGNANCY, DELIVERY, AND LACTATION IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS FROM THE IORRA COHORT

Background:

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is common in women with reproductive age. For this reason, RA treatment during pregnancy and lactation is very important. In recent years, the use of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) has become common in RA treatment (1), treatment during pregnancy and lactation has changed drastically (2,3).

Objectives:

To investigate the pregnancy, delivery and lactation status of RA patients and treatment during that period in daily practice.

Methods:

The IORRA cohort is a large, single institute-based, observational cohort of RA patients established at Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, in 2000. We identified female RA patients aged 20-49 years who answered ‘pregnant’ or ‘delivered’ in the IORRA survey in 2010-2016 and whose pregnancies were confirmed in the medical records. We examined the Disease Activity Score with 28 joint count (DAS28)-CRP, medication use situation, the outcome of pregnancy, and lactation in those patients.

Results:

A total of 101 patients and 143 pregnancies were confirmed, of which 136 outcomes of pregnancy could be confirmed in the medical records. Among 136 confirmed pregnancy cases, there were 106 births and 30 miscarriages. Among 106 births, 4 cases (3.8%) were birth defects that could be confirmed in the medical records. The average age at pregnancy was 34.2±3.7 years and 36.1±3.3 years in delivered and miscarried cases, respectively. Miscarried cases were significantly older pregnancies (p=0.01). Of the 106 births, 65 birth weeks were confirmed, with an average of 37.9±1.8 weeks. The number of preterm delivery was 11 cases (16.9%). The average birth weight of 59 babies whose birth weight could be confirmed was 2699±517 g. There were 21 cases (35.6%) of low birth weight infants. The proportion of patients in DAS28-CRP remission was 73.1% before pregnancy, 61.6% during pregnancy, and 68.0% 1 year after delivery. Drugs used before pregnancy were glucocorticoid (48.8%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (14.2%), conventional synthetic DMARDs (24.8%), and bDMARDs (48.0%). Etanercept accounted for 90% of bDMARDs. Among taking bDMARDs patients, 73.8% were discontinued after the pregnancy, and 26.2% were continued during pregnancy. Among those patients who continued bDMARDs, lactating patients were 12/26 (46.2%) cases after delivery, 10/30 (33.3%) cases in six months after delivery, and 7/36 (19.4%) cases in 1 year after delivery, respectively.

Conclusion:

The actual situation of pregnancy, delivery, and lactation in RA patients was revealed. Especially, bDMARDs were used at relatively high rates in RA patients who wish to have a child.

References:

[1]Lancet. 2017;10;389:2338-2348.

[2]Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019;49:S32-S35.

[3]Rheumatology. 2016;55:1693-7.

Disclosure of Interests:

Moeko Ochiai: None declared, Eiichi Tanaka Consultant of: ET has received lecture fees or consulting fees from Abbvie, Asahi Kasei pharma co., Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Eisai Pharmaceutical, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., and UCB Pharma., Speakers bureau: ET has received lecture fees or consulting fees from Abbvie, Asahi Kasei pharma co., Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Eisai Pharmaceutical, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., and UCB Pharma., Eisuke Inoue Speakers bureau: EI has received speaker fee from Bristol-Meyers, Pfizer, Merck serono., Mai Abe: None declared, Eri Sugano: None declared, Naohiro Sugitani: None declared, Kumiko Saka: None declared, higuchi yoko: None declared, Rei Yamaguchi: None declared, Naoki Sugimoto: None declared, Ikari Katsunori Speakers bureau: KI has received speaker’s fee from Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp., Astellas Pharma Inc., AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eis, ai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Kaken Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp.Pfizer Japan Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Teijin Pharma Ltd and UCB Japan Co. Ltd., Ayako Nakajima Grant/research support from: AN has received research grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Pfizer Japan Inc., Consultant of: AN has consultant fee from Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd., Speakers bureau: AN has received speaker’s fee from AbbVie Japan GK, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Japan LTD., Asahi Kasei Pharma Co., Astellas Pharma Inc., Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co. Inc., Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Pfizer Japan Inc., and Teijin Pharma Ltd., Atsuo Taniguchi: None declared, Hisashi Yamanaka Grant/research support from: HY has received research grant or speaker fee from AbbVie, Astellas, Ayumi, Behringer, Bristol-Meyers, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Kaken, Nippon-Shinyaku, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Taisyo-Toyama, Takeda, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Teijin Pharma, Torii, UCB, YLbio., Speakers bureau: HY has received research grant or speaker fee from AbbVie, Astellas, Ayumi, Behringer, Bristol-Meyers, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Kaken, Nippon-Shinyaku, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Taisyo-Toyama, Takeda, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Teijin Pharma, Torii, UCB, YLbio., masayoshi harigai Grant/research support from: AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., and Teijin Pharma Ltd. MH has received speaker’s fee from AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Oxford Immuotec, Pfizer Japan Inc., and Teijin Pharma Ltd. MH is a consultant for AbbVie, Boehringer-ingelheim, Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Teijin Pharma.

AB0257 ASSESSMENT OF PHYSICAL DYSFUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS WHO PLANNED PREGNANCY FROM THE IORRA COHORT

Background:

It has been reported that female rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have a longer time to pregnancy than healthy women (1), and that high Disease Activity Score with 28 joint count (DAS28) -CRP in preconception increases the frequency of infertility (2). Before the era of biologics, RA treatment tended to be inadequate from pregnancy planning to the end of lactation. And it was not uncommon for female RA patients to be unable to get pregnant or develop physical dysfunction as a result of insufficient control of the disease. There are some reports of disease activity during pregnancy and postpartum in RA patients, and the effects of RA disease activity on pregnancy and childbirth outcomes (3-5), but there are few reports focusing on the physical function during pregnancy planning of RA patients.

Objectives:

To investigate disease activity and physical function in female patients with RA who planned and didn’t plan pregnancy.

Methods:

The IORRA cohort is a large, single institute-based, observational cohort of RA patients established at the Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, in 2000. We identified female RA patients aged 20-49 years who answered ‘pregnant’ or ‘delivered’ in the IORRA survey in 2010-2015 and whose pregnancy and the pregnancy planning time was confirmed in the medical records, and defined them as the pregnancy planning (PP) group. Matched control was extracted at 1:3 ratio from patients without pregnancy plan based on entry time, age, RA disease duration, DAS28-CRP, Japanese version of Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ) score, and comorbidities. The primary endpoint was J-HAQ at 3years from the baseline, which was defined as the most recent IORRA survey before planning pregnancy. The mixed-effect model for repeated measures was used to analyze group difference.

Results:

There were 40 patients in the PP group (average 32.2 years, disease duration 5.7 years, DAS28-CRP 1.7, J-HAQ 0.26), and 120 patients in the control group (average 32.4 years, disease duration 5.9 years, DAS28-CRP 1.7, J-HAQ 0.21). The proportion of user and dosage of MTX and glucocorticoid (GC) and bDMARDs user at baseline were comparable between the groups (MTX: PP 87.5% [9.8 mg/week], control 85.0% [8.8 mg/week]; GC: PP 32.5% [3.6 mg/day], control 27.5% [4.4 mg/day]; bDMARDs: PP 40.0%, control 27.5%). DAS28-CRP at year 3 of the PP group elevated and was higher than the control group (PP 2.3, control 1.7, p<0.01), while J-HAQ was stable over the observation period and did not differ significantly at year 3 (PP 0.21, control 0.22, p=0.92). At year 3, the proportion of patients taking MTX was lower and taking GC was higher in the PP group than those in the control group (MTX: PP 36.7%, control 76.7%, p<0.01; GC: PP 70.0%, control 25.6%, p<0.01). The proportion of patients taking bDMARDs was not different in both groups (PP 36.7%, control 32.6%, p=0.68).

Conclusion:

Physical function in pregnancy planning patients with RA did not deteriorate as well as the control patients in clinical settings.

References:

[1]Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63:1517-1521.

[2]Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;10:1836-1841.

[3]J Rheumatol. 2015;42:1376-1382.

[4]J Rheumatol. 2019;46:245-250.

[5]Arthritis Care Res. 2017;69:1297-1303.

Disclosure of Interests:

Moeko Ochiai: None declared, Eiichi Tanaka Consultant of: ET has received lecture fees or consulting fees from Abbvie, Asahi Kasei pharma co., Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Eisai Pharmaceutical, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., and UCB Pharma., Speakers bureau: ET has received lecture fees or consulting fees from Abbvie, Asahi Kasei pharma co., Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Eisai Pharmaceutical, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., and UCB Pharma., Eisuke Inoue Speakers bureau: EI has received speaker fee from Bristol-Meyers, Pfizer, Merck serono., Mai Abe: None declared, Eri Sugano: None declared, Naohiro Sugitani: None declared, Kumiko Saka: None declared, higuchi yoko: None declared, Rei Yamaguchi: None declared, Naoki Sugimoto: None declared, Ikari Katsunori Speakers bureau: KI has received speaker’s fee from Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp., Astellas Pharma Inc., AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eis, ai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Kaken Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp.Pfizer Japan Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Teijin Pharma Ltd and UCB Japan Co. Ltd., Ayako Nakajima Grant/research support from: AN has received research grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Pfizer Japan Inc., Consultant of: AN has consultant fee from Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd., Speakers bureau: AN has received speaker’s fee from AbbVie Japan GK, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Japan LTD., Asahi Kasei Pharma Co., Astellas Pharma Inc., Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co. Inc., Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Pfizer Japan Inc., and Teijin Pharma Ltd., Atsuo Taniguchi: None declared, Hisashi Yamanaka Grant/research support from: HY has received research grant or speaker fee from AbbVie, Astellas, Ayumi, Behringer, Bristol-Meyers, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Kaken, Nippon-Shinyaku, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Taisyo-Toyama, Takeda, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Teijin Pharma, Torii, UCB, YLbio., Speakers bureau: HY has received research grant or speaker fee from AbbVie, Astellas, Ayumi, Behringer, Bristol-Meyers, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Kaken, Nippon-Shinyaku, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Taisyo-Toyama, Takeda, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Teijin Pharma, Torii, UCB, YLbio., masayoshi harigai Grant/research support from: AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., and Teijin Pharma Ltd. MH has received speaker’s fee from AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Oxford Immuotec, Pfizer Japan Inc., and Teijin Pharma Ltd. MH is a consultant for AbbVie, Boehringer-ingelheim, Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Teijin Pharma.

OP0221 HAVE 5-YEAR SURVIVAL RATE AND MORTALITY CHANGED IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS IN THE PAST TWENTY YEARS?-RESULTS FROM THE IORRA COHORT

Background:

The mortality of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) had been reported as being worse than that of the general population [1, 2], but is expected to have improved over time because the progress in treatment of RA during the past twenty years has been actively adopted to RA management [3, 4]. However, the change in the mortality still remains controversial in patients with early RA [5, 6].

Objectives:

To investigate whether the vital prognosis of patients with early RA has changed in the past twenty years.

Methods:

The IORRA cohort is a large observational cohort established in 2000 at the Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University. Essentially, all Japanese patients diagnosed with RA at our institute were registered and clinical parameters were assessed biannually. As there is no National Death Registry in Japan, we obtained death report from residual families who responded to our mail query to patients who failed to conduct the subsequent IORRA survey, from physicians of affiliated hospitals and from police in case they found dead patient outside of a hospital. In this study, the patients with early RA (less than 2 years of disease duration) who participated in the survey for the first time from 2001 to 2012 were included and observed for five years from the date of the initial survey. We classified patients into group A (enrolled in 2001-2006) and B (enrolled in 2007-2012). Five-year survival rate and standardized mortality ratio (SMR) were calculated for each group. SMR was calculated using the life tables in Japanese general population reported by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. The effects of loss to follow-up cases were evaluated by multiple imputation method as a sensitivity analysis of SMR.

Results:

A total of 3,217 patients with early RA were analyzed. The number of patients was 1,609 (79.4% female) in the group A and 1,608 (81.8% female) in B. The median age at baseline was 55 in both groups. Among a total of 3,217 patients, 486 (15.1%) patients were lost during 5-year follow-up; 213 (13.2%) in the group A and 273 (17.0%) in B, respectively. During the observational period, deaths were confirmed in 47 cases (2.9%) in the group A and 45 (2.8%) in B. Major causes of death included malignancies (28% in the group A, 38% in B), respiratory involvement (23% in the group A, 40% in B), cerebrovascular disorders (11% in the group A, 2% in B), and cardiovascular disorders (11% in the group A, 0% in B). The five-year survival rate was 88.8% for the group A and 87.8% for B, and the SMR was 0.81 (95%CI: 0.59-1.08) for the group A and 0.78 (0.57-1.04) for B when assuming all the lost to follow-up patients were alive for 5 years. In the sensitivity analysis assuming that the mortality rate of patients who were lost to follow-up was twice as that of the general population, the SMR was 0.90 (0.68-1.19) for the group A and 0.92 (0.68-1.23) for B.

Conclusion:

The mortality of patients with early RA in the past twenty years has been comparable to that of the Japanese general population. In addition, the SMR and the five-year survival rate did not change overtime.

References:

[1]Cobb, S., et al. N Engl J Med 1953; 249(14): 553-556.

[2]Nakajima, A., et al. Scand J Rheumatol 2010; 39(5): 360-367.

[3]Smolen, J. S., et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73(3): 492-509.

[4]Singh, J. A., et al. Arthritis Care Res 2016; 68(1): 1-25.

[5]Lacaille, D., et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76(6): 1057-1063.

[6]Humphreys, J. H., et al. Arthritis Care Res 2014; 66(9): 1296-1301.

Disclosure of Interests:

Naohiro Sugitani: None declared, Eiichi Tanaka Consultant of: Abbvie, Asahi Kasei pharma co., Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Eisai Pharmaceutical, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., and UCB Pharma., Eisuke Inoue Speakers bureau: EI has received speaker fee from Bristol-Meyers, Pfizer, Merck serono., Mai Abe: None declared, Eri Sugano: None declared, Kumiko Saka: None declared, Moeko Ochiai: None declared, Yoko Shimizu: None declared, Rei Yamaguchi: None declared, Naoki Sugimoto: None declared, Katsunori Ikari Speakers bureau: Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp., Astellas Pharma Inc., AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eis, ai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Kaken Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp.Pfizer Japan Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Teijin Pharma Ltd and UCB Japan Co. Ltd., Ayako Nakajima Grant/research support from: AN has received research grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Pfizer Japan Inc., Consultant of: AN has consultant fee from Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd., Speakers bureau: AN has received speaker’s fee from AbbVie Japan GK, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Japan LTD., Asahi Kasei Pharma Co., Astellas Pharma Inc., Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co. Inc., Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Pfizer Japan Inc., and Teijin Pharma Ltd., Atsuo Taniguchi: None declared, Hisashi Yamanaka Grant/research support from: HY has received research grant or speaker fee from AbbVie, Astellas, Ayumi, Behringer, Bristol-Meyers, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Kaken, Nippon-Shinyaku, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Taisyo-Toyama, Takeda, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Teijin Pharma, Torii, UCB, YLbio., Speakers bureau: HY has received research grant or speaker fee from AbbVie, Astellas, Ayumi, Behringer, Bristol-Meyers, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Kaken, Nippon-Shinyaku, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Taisyo-Toyama, Takeda, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Teijin Pharma, Torii, UCB, YLbio., masayoshi harigai Grant/research support from: AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., and Teijin Pharma Ltd. MH has received speaker’s fee from AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Oxford Immuotec, Pfizer Japan Inc., and Teijin Pharma Ltd. MH is a consultant for AbbVie, Boehringer-ingelheim, Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Teijin Pharma.

THU0086 FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH TREATMENT RESPONSE IN PATIENTS WITH ELDERLY-ONSET RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: 3-YEAR OBSERVATION USING THE IORRA COHORT

Background:

Patients with elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA) are on the rise in the aging or super-aging society, especially in Japan. Patients with EORA have more comorbidities than those with younger-onset RA, a higher risk of adverse drug reactions due to reduced drug metabolism, and a higher risk of infections1). Therefore, patients with EORA tend to receive suboptimal treatment, resulting in insufficient control of disease activity2). Although several studies reported treatment responsiveness in patients with EORA, many of them have a limited observation period3-8), and long-term treatment responses and their associated factors need to be clarified.

Objectives:

We retrospectively evaluated treatment responses of patients with EORA for 3 years and their associated factors in a clinical setting.

Methods:

The Institute of Rheumatology Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) cohort is a large, single institute-based, observational cohort of RA patients established at Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, in 2000. The subjects were RA patients who first enrolled in the IORRA cohort from 2010 to 2014, were over 60 years old with less than 1-year disease duration, and had a DAS28-ESR over 3.2 at entry. The primary endpoint was DAS28-ESR <3.2 after 3-year observation. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors at baseline associated with the primary endpoint. The missing values of DAS28-ESR were imputed by using the last observation carried forward method.

Results:

Among a total of 250 patients in this study, 152 patients (60.8%) achieved DAS28-ESR <3.2 after 3-year observation (remission/low disease activity (RL) group), and 98 patients did not (moderate/high disease activity (MH) group). Baseline characteristics of the patients were as follows (average ± SD or %): the RL group, age 69.9 ± 6.5, female 77%, DAS28-ESR 4.3 ± 0.8, J-HAQ 0.9 ± 0.7, PSL user 23.7%, MTX user 64.5%, and biologics user 4.0%; the MH group, age 69.4 ± 6.7, female 80.6%, DAS28-ESR 4.4 ± 0.8, J-HAQ 1.0 ± 0.7, PSL user 36.7%, MTX user 64.3%, and biologics user 6.1%. Proportions of the patients with cardiovascular disease and malignancy were 13.3% and 11.2% in the MH group and 5.9% and 1.3% in the RL group, respectively. DAS28-ESR and J-HAQ score after 3-year observation of the RL group were 2.3±0.5 and 0.4±0.5, respectively, and those of the MH group were 3.4±0.9 and 1.0±0.8, respectively. Corticosteroid use and having malignancy at baseline were associated with not achieving DAS28-ESR <3.2 after 3-year observation using multivariate analysis (Table 1). Similar results were obtained when MTX use and corticosteroid use were replaced by the average dose of each drug.

Conclusion:

The majority of the patients with EORA achieved DAS28-ESR <3.2 after 3-year observation, and no use of corticosteroid and absence of malignancy at baseline were associated with the good outcome.

References:

[1]Nat Rev Rheumatol 2013;9:604-613

[2]Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:1226-1229

[3]Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1470–1473

[4]Joint Bone Spine 2015;82:25-30

[5]J Rheumatol 2016;43:1974-1983

[6]Rheumatology 2015;54:798-807

[7]Rheumatology 2014;53:1075-1086

[8]Japanese Journal of Geriatrics 2018;55:251-258

Acknowledgments:

We thank all patients who participated in the IORRA survey and all of the members of the Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, for the successful management of the IORRA cohort.

Disclosure of Interests:

Mai Abe: None declared, Eiichi Tanaka Consultant of: Abbvie, Asahi Kasei pharma co., Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Eisai Pharmaceutical, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., and UCB Pharma., Eisuke Inoue Speakers bureau: EI has received speaker fee from Bristol-Meyers, Pfizer, Merck serono., Eri Sugano: None declared, Naohiro Sugitani: None declared, Kumiko Saka: None declared, Moeko Ochiai: None declared, Yoko Shimizu: None declared, Rei Yamaguchi: None declared, Naoki Sugimoto: None declared, Katsunori Ikari Speakers bureau: Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp., Astellas Pharma Inc., AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eis, ai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Kaken Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp.Pfizer Japan Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Teijin Pharma Ltd and UCB Japan Co. Ltd., Ayako Nakajima Grant/research support from: AN has received research grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Pfizer Japan Inc., Consultant of: AN has consultant fee from Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd., Speakers bureau: AN has received speaker’s fee from AbbVie Japan GK, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Japan LTD., Asahi Kasei Pharma Co., Astellas Pharma Inc., Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co. Inc., Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Pfizer Japan Inc., and Teijin Pharma Ltd., Atsuo Taniguchi: None declared, Hisashi Yamanaka Grant/research support from: HY has received research grant or speaker fee from AbbVie, Astellas, Ayumi, Behringer, Bristol-Meyers, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Kaken, Nippon-Shinyaku, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Taisyo-Toyama, Takeda, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Teijin Pharma, Torii, UCB, YLbio., Speakers bureau: HY has received research grant or speaker fee from AbbVie, Astellas, Ayumi, Behringer, Bristol-Meyers, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Kaken, Nippon-Shinyaku, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Taisyo-Toyama, Takeda, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Teijin Pharma, Torii, UCB, YLbio., masayoshi harigai Grant/research support from: AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., and Teijin Pharma Ltd. MH has received speaker’s fee from AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Oxford Immuotec, Pfizer Japan Inc., and Teijin Pharma Ltd. MH is a consultant for AbbVie, Boehringer-ingelheim, Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Teijin Pharma.

Risk factors for arthropathy in patients with ulcerative colitis after total colectomy

OBJECTIVE

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) often develop arthropathy. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of and risk factors for arthropathy in patients with UC who underwent total colectomy which is the final radical treatment lead to remission.

METHODS

Patients who underwent total colectomy from January 2007 to April 2016 were analyzed for the development of arthropathy. The type of arthropathy and risk factors for developing arthropathy were analyzed by clinical and endoscopic severity classification, extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) and medical treatment.

RESULTS

Total of 219 patients who underwent total colectomy with sufficient medical records were analyzed. Forty-eight cases (21.9%) had EIMs, and 40 cases (18.2%) developed arthropathy (57.0% polyarthropathy; 42.5% peripheral arthropathy). Multivariate analysis showed that severity of Matts classification grade 3 or 4 versus grade 1 or 2 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-4.36, p < .05) and EIMs other than arthropathy (HR 3.29, 95% CI 1.43-7.58, p < .05) were risk factors for the development of arthropathy.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that approximately one fifth of patients with UC who underwent total colectomy developed arthropathy. The risk factors for the development of arthropathy were preoperative endoscopic disease activity and EIMs.

Rheumatoid factor is correlated with disease activity and inflammatory markers in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis

BACKGROUND

Some patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) also have positivity of rheumatoid factor (RF). However, the clinical significance of this occurrence remains unknown in AAV patients. The aim of this study was to clarify an association between the presence of RF and clinical features in patients with AAV.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients diagnosed with AAV who were not complicated with RA were enrolled in this study. We compared clinical manifestations of AAV between an RF-positive subset (n = 29) and an RF-negative subset (n = 18). The Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) was higher (P = 0.026) in the RF-positive subset than in the RF-negative subset. The levels of CRP and ESR were higher in the RF-positive patients (P = 0.020 and P = 0.007, respectively) compared to the RF-negative subset. IgM-RF titers were significantly correlated with the BVAS (r = 0.50, P = 0.0004). In addition, the IgM-RF titers had significant correlations with the levels of CRP (r = 0.41, P = 0.004), ESR (r = 0.39, P = 0.016), IgM (r = 0.36, P = 0.016) and IgG (r = 0.37, P = 0.015). The frequency of commencement of dialysis therapy, usage of mechanical ventilation and mortality were higher in the RF-positive subset than in the RF-negative subset.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AAV, RF titers were significantly correlated with disease activity and the levels of inflammatory markers. The presence of RF could be a poor prognostic factor in patients with AAV.