Extreme low-flow conditions in a dual-chamber denitrification bioreactor contribute to pollution swapping with low landscape-scale impact

Denitrification bioreactors are an effective edge-of-field conservation practice for nitrate (NO₃) reduction from subsurface drainage. However, these systems may produce other pollutants and greenhouse gases during NO₃ removal. Here a dual-chamber woodchip bioreactor system experiencing extreme low-flow conditions was monitored for its spatiotemporal NO₃ and total organic carbon dynamics in the drainage water. Near complete removal of NO₃ was observed in both bioreactor chambers in the first two years of monitoring (2019-2020) and in the third year of monitoring in chamber A, with significant (p < 0.01) reduction of the NO₃-N each year in both chambers with 8.6-11.4 mg NO₃-N L^-1 removed on average. Based on the NO₃ removal observed, spatial monitoring of sulfate (SO₄), dissolved methane (CH₄), and dissolved nitrous oxide (N₂O) gases was added in the third year of monitoring (2021). In 2021, chambers A and B had median hydraulic residence times (HRTs) of 64 h and 39 h, respectively, due to varying elevations of the chambers, with drought conditions making the differences more pronounced. In 2021, significant production of dissolved CH₄ was observed at rates of 0.54 g CH₄-C m^-3 d^-1 and 0.07 g CH₄-C m^-3 d^-1 in chambers A and B, respectively. In chamber A, significant removal (p < 0.01) of SO₄ (0.23 g SO₄ m^-3 d^-1) and dissolved N₂O (0.21 mg N₂O-N m^-2 d^-1) were observed, whereas chamber B produced N₂O (0.36 mg N₂O-N m^-2 d^-1). Considering the carbon dioxide equivalents (CO₂e) on an annual basis, chamber A had loads (~12,000 kg CO₂e ha^-1 y^-1) greater than comparable poorly drained agricultural soils; however, the landscape-scale impact was small (<1 % change in CO₂e) when expressed over the drainage area treated by the bioreactor. Under low-flow conditions, pollution swapping in woodchip bioreactors can be reduced at HRTs <50 h and NO₃ concentrations >2 mg N L^-1.

Long-term impact of poultry manure on crop yield, soil and water quality, and crop revenue

A long-term poultry manure fertilizer study was initiated in 1998 and continued until 2009 under corn-soybean (CS) rotation. To match changing landscape trends, the plots were switched to continuous corn (CC) from 2010 to 2017. In both CS and CC phases, poultry manure (PM) was applied at the crop rotation recommended agronomic N rate and either half (CC phase) or double (CS phase) the recommended rate. Urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN) was applied to comparison plots at the crop recommended application rate (168 kg N ha^-1 and 224 kg N ha^-1 for the CS and CC phases, respectively) throughout the study. The objectives of this study include evaluation of the economic benefits of long-term PM application at various rates (PM2, PM, and PM0.5), and the impact of poultry manure application on soil health and nutrient levels, crop yield, and drainage water quality. Lower NO₃-N concentrations were reported in drainage from PM treated plots when compared to UAN fertilizer applied at the same agronomic rate. Of the parameters tested for soil health analysis after twenty years of repeat application, particulate organic matter (POM) present was significantly greater in the PM treated soils (6.1-6.7 g kg soil^-1) when compared to UAN plots (4.6 g kg soil^-1), showing potential for stabilized soil particles, increased infiltration and water-holding capacity. The results show a consistent positive impact of manure application on corn and soybean yields when compared to yields observed in UAN treated plots. During the CS phase, we estimated the same average revenue per dollar spent for PM and UAN treatments, while the average return rate for PM2 was 1% lower; during CC phase,15% increased return rates were observed when PM0.5 and PM were compared against the UAN treatment. When managed properly, PM application to cropland is a sustainable option for diversifying agroecosystems, improving soil health and improving farm economics.

Woodchip Denitrification Bioreactors: Impact of Temperature and Hydraulic Retention Time on Nitrate Removal

Woodchip denitrification bioreactors, a relatively new technology for edge-of-field treatment of subsurface agricultural drainage water, have shown potential for nitrate removal. However, few studies have evaluated the performance of these reactors under varied controlled conditions including initial woodchip age and a range of hydraulic retention times (HRTs) and temperatures similar to the field. This study investigated (i) the release of total organic C (TOC) during reactor start up for fresh and weathered woodchips, (ii) nitrate (NO-N) removal at HRTs ranging from 2 to 24 h, (iii) nitrate removal at influent NO-N concentrations of 10, 30, and 50 mg L, and (iv) NO-N removal at 10, 15, and 20°C. Greater TOC was released during bioreactor operation with fresh woodchips, whereas organic C release was low when the columns were packed with naturally weathered woodchips. Nitrate-N concentration reductions increased from 8 to 55% as HRT increased. Nitrate removal on a mass basis (g NO-N m d) did not follow the same trend, with relatively consistent mass removal measured as HRT increased from 1.7 to 21.2 h. Comparison of mean NO-N load reduction for various influent NO-N concentrations showed lower reduction at an influent concentration of 10 mg L and higher NO-N reductions at influent concentrations of 30 and 50 mg L. Nitrate-N removal showed a stepped increase with temperature. Temperature coefficient () factors calculated from NO-N removal rates ranged from 2.2 to 2.9.