1
|
Nannini LJ, Brandan N, Fernández OM. Bronchodilator responsiveness testing with inhaled budesonide/formoterol in asthma. J Asthma 2023; 60:1997-2001. [PMID: 37115806 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2023.2209172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The choice of bronchodilators for responsiveness testing (BRT) is a clinical decision according to ATS/ERS. Since January 2019 we use budesonide/formoterol for BRT in asthma at our center in Argentina. The aim was to compare budesonide/formoterol with salbutamol for BRT in stable asthmatic patients that were followed up in a short-acting beta2 agonist (SABA)-free asthma center. METHODS From the Hospital database, we found for the same patient at least one BRT using salbutamol 200 µg and another with budesonide/formoterol 320/9 µg. RESULTS We found similar BRT between salbutamol and budesonide/formoterol in 101 asthmatic individuals (26 males) aged 38.14 ± 16.1 yrs (mean ± Standard deviation). The absolute response was 0.18 ± 0.21 L in FEV1 after salbutamol and 0.20 ± 0.22 L in FEV1 after budesonide/formoterol. Afterwards, we showed 202 patients tested with budesonide/formoterol; the mean absolute response was 0.21 ± 0.22 L in FEV1. There were no unexpected safety findings. CONCLUSIONS In asthmatic patients, we demonstrated similar efficacy between Budesonide/formoterol and salbutamol for BRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis J Nannini
- Pulmonary Section, Hospital E Perón, Granadero Baigorria, Argentina
- Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Granadero Baigorria, Argentina
| | - N Brandan
- Pulmonary Section, Hospital E Perón, Granadero Baigorria, Argentina
| | - O M Fernández
- Pulmonary Section, Hospital E Perón, Granadero Baigorria, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martínez-Alarcón L, Flores-Medina J, Ramis G, Gómez-Laguna J, Moll X, Falceto V, San Román-Ascaso F, San Román-Llorens F, Quereda JJ, Herrero JM, Mendonça L, Martin-Barrasa JL, Fernández OM, Muñoz A, Ramírez P, Gutiérrez P, López-Chicheri I, López-Navas A, Ríos A. Organ xenotransplantation acceptance in veterinary students: A multicentric opinion study in Spain. Xenotransplantation 2023; 30:e12823. [PMID: 37695105 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The shortage of available transplant organs has made it necessary to search for alternatives, one of which is xenotransplantation. However, the use of animal organs could face rejection from society and the personnel involved in its implementation. OBJECTIVES (a) to analyze the attitudes of Veterinary Degree students in six Spanish Universities towards xenotransplantation; and (b) to determine the factors that affect its acceptance. METHODS Of the 2815 students surveyed in the degree program, 2683 valid surveys were obtained. Attitudes towards organ xenotransplantation were evaluated using a validated questionnaire of organ donation. RESULTS If xenotransplantation was confirmed as a clinical reality, 93% (n = 2493) of those surveyed would accept a xenotransplanted organ, whilst 7% would not. If the results of xenotransplantation were worse than those obtained with human donors and it entailed more risk, 12% (n = 318) would be in favor. 56% (n = 1497) of the students would accept a xenotransplantation provisionally pending the arrival of a human organ. Attitudes towards xenotransplantation were affected by the academic year in which a student was studying, with more favorable attitudes among students in the last year (88% in first year vs. 95% in fifth year; p < .001). More favorable attitudes are also observed depending on the attitude they have towards organ transplantation, with those students being more in favor of donating their organs when they die (94% vs. 88%; p < .001). CONCLUSION Veterinary students would have a very favorable attitude toward xenotransplantation if these animal organs functioned as well as human organs. Therefore, these students could play an important role in the future promotion of this technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Martínez-Alarcón
- International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain
- Surgery Service, Transplant Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
| | - Juan Flores-Medina
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), Murcia, Spain
| | - Guillermo Ramis
- International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain
- Surgery Service, Transplant Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Jaime Gómez-Laguna
- Department of Anatomy and Comparative Pathology and Toxicology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Xavier Moll
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victoria Falceto
- Department of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Fidel San Román-Ascaso
- Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fidel San Román-Llorens
- Department of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Juan José Quereda
- Department of Animal Production and Health, Veterinary Public Health and Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary, University Cardenal Herrera-CEU, Valencia, Spain
| | - Juan Manuel Herrero
- Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Livia Mendonça
- Faculty of Veterinary, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiania, Brazil
| | - José Luis Martin-Barrasa
- Experimental Animal Facility, Research Unit, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria, Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Arucas, Spain
- Animal Infectious Diseases and Ictiopatology, University Institute of Animal Health (IUSA), University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Arucas, Spain
| | - Olga María Fernández
- Animalario libre de Patógenos Arrixaca-Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
| | - Antonio Muñoz
- Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Pablo Ramírez
- International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain
- Surgery Service, Transplant Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Pedro Gutiérrez
- Urology Service, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
- Departmen of Surgery, University of La Laguna, San Cristóbal de la Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Isabel López-Chicheri
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), Murcia, Spain
| | - Ana López-Navas
- International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), Murcia, Spain
| | - Antonio Ríos
- International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain
- Surgery Service, Transplant Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nannini LJ, Neumayer NS, Brandan N, Fernández OM, Flores DM. Asthma-related hospitalizations after implementing SABA-free asthma management with a maintenance and anti-inflammatory reliever regimen. Eur Clin Respir J 2022; 9:2110706. [PMID: 35959199 PMCID: PMC9361757 DOI: 10.1080/20018525.2022.2110706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Overreliance on short-acting β2-agonists (SABA) has been a common feature of asthma management globally for at least 30 years. However, given the evidence against the long-term use of SABA, including potentially increased risk of exacerbations, emergency room visits, overall healthcare resource utilization, and mortality, the latest Global Initiative for Asthma report no longer recommends SABA only therapy. Since 2014, we implemented an ICS-containing reliever strategy at our asthma center at the G Baigorria Hospital in Argentina; we only administered budesonide/formoterol via a single inhaler device across the spectrum of asthma severity and completely eliminated the use of SABA therapy. In this article, we compare hospitalization data from our center, previously reported in the EAGLE study (when inhaled corticosteroids plus as-needed SABA was administered) for the years 1999 and 2004 with data from 2017 to 2018 (when budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler device was administered as maintenance and/or anti-inflammatory reliever therapy [MART/AIR] without any SABA) from our center, to assess the impact of two distinct asthma management strategies on asthma-related hospitalizations. MART/AIR regimens in our SABA-free center reduced asthma hospitalizations from 9 (1999 and 2004) to 1 (2017 and 2018) (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.031; odds ratio = 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.013-0.98); the hospitalization rate was reduced by 92% (1.47% in 1999 and 2004 to 0.12% in 2017 and 2018). Our data provide preliminary real-world evidence that MART/AIR with budesonide/formoterol simultaneously with SABA elimination across asthma severities is an effective asthma management strategy for reducing asthma-related hospitalizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L J Nannini
- Pulmonary Section, Hospital E Perón, Universidad Nacional Rosario, Granadero Baigorria, Argentina.,Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Granadero Baigorria, Argentina
| | - N S Neumayer
- Pulmonary Section, Hospital E Perón, Universidad Nacional Rosario, Granadero Baigorria, Argentina
| | - N Brandan
- Pulmonary Section, Hospital E Perón, Universidad Nacional Rosario, Granadero Baigorria, Argentina
| | - O M Fernández
- Pulmonary Section, Hospital E Perón, Universidad Nacional Rosario, Granadero Baigorria, Argentina
| | - D M Flores
- Pulmonary Section, Hospital E Perón, Universidad Nacional Rosario, Granadero Baigorria, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Martínez-Alarcón L, Ríos A, Ramis G, Gómez-Laguna J, Moll X, Falceto V, San Román-Acaso F, San Román-Llorens F, Quereda JJ, Herrero Medrano JM, Mendonça L, Martin-Barrasa JL, Fernández OM, Muñoz A, Ramírez P, Parrilla P. Veterinary Spanish Students' Attitude Toward Presumed Consent in Organ Donation. Transplant Proc 2020; 51:3004-3007. [PMID: 31711582 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Veterinarians often are involved in transplantation research projects. They are a fundamental social group who can influence public opinion about organ donation and transplantation (ODT). OBJECTIVE The objective was to determine the knowledge of Spanish veterinary students about the concept of brain death and the law of presumed consent. METHODS A sociologic, multicenter, and observational study was carried out in the veterinary students enrolled in Spain (n = 9000) in a complete academic year. A sample of 2815 students was stratified by geographic area and academic year. The students' attitudes on the psychosocial aspects of ODT were evaluated using a psychosocial validated questionnaire (PCID-DTO Rios). It was self-administered and completed anonymously. Veterinary schools were randomly selected. The questionnaire was applied to each academic year at compulsory sessions. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Student t test, χ2 test, and logistic regression analysis were used. RESULTS The completion rate was 91% (n = 2558). Of students, 66% (n = 1664) understood the concept of brain death, 30% had doubts, whereas 5% believed that a person with brain death can recover and lead a normal life. Concerning legislation, 63% (n = 1615) were against the law of presumed consent, and 37% were in favor. An analysis of variables determining more favorable acceptance of the law showed that year of study (P = .000), knowing a donor (P = .020), and attitude toward ODT (P = .000) did have an effect on acceptance. Most students, 71% (n = 1875), were interested in attending a talk about ODT. CONCLUSION Only 37% of Spanish veterinary students would accept the law of presumed consent. Most students were interested in attending an informative talk about ODT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Martínez-Alarcón
- Servicio de Cirugía, Unidad de Trasplantes, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia-España; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia-España; "International Collaborative Donor Project," Murcia-España
| | - Antonio Ríos
- Servicio de Cirugía, Unidad de Trasplantes, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia-España; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia-España; "International Collaborative Donor Project," Murcia-España.
| | - Guillermo Ramis
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia-España; "International Collaborative Donor Project," Murcia-España; Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia-España, Murcia, Spain
| | - Jaime Gómez-Laguna
- Departament of Anatomy and Comparative Pathology, University of Córdoba, Spain
| | - Xavier Moll
- Departamento de Medicina y Cirugía Animal, Facultad Veterinaria, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona (UAB) España, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Juan José Quereda
- Grupo Fisiopatología de la Reproducción, Departamento Producción y Sanidad Animal, Salud Pública Veterinaria y Ciencia y Tecnología de los Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Livia Mendonça
- Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiania, Brazil
| | - José Luis Martin-Barrasa
- Experimental Animal Facility, Research Unit, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria, Dr Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain; Animal Infectious Diseases and Ictiopatology, University Institute of Animal Health (IUSA), University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Arucas, Spain
| | - Olga María Fernández
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia-España; Animalario libre de Patógenos Arrixaca- IMIB, Murcia-España
| | - Antonio Muñoz
- Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia-España, Murcia, Spain
| | - Pablo Ramírez
- Servicio de Cirugía, Unidad de Trasplantes, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia-España; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia-España; "International Collaborative Donor Project," Murcia-España
| | - Pascual Parrilla
- Servicio de Cirugía, Unidad de Trasplantes, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia-España; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia-España
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Martínez-Alarcón L, Ríos A, Ramis G, Gómez-Laguna J, Moll X, Falceto V, San Román-Acaso F, San Román-Llorens F, Quereda JJ, Herrero-Medrano JM, Mendonça L, Martin-Barrasa JL, Fernández OM, López-Navas AI, Hernández AM, Muñoz A, Ramírez P, Parrilla P. Attitude Toward Organ Donation and Transplantation in Veterinary Students: A Multicenter and Stratified Study in Spain. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:362-365. [PMID: 29579804 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.11.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2017] [Accepted: 11/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Veterinarians often hold decision-making positions in the public health care system and can therefore influence public opinion about organ donation and transplantation (ODT). The aim of this work was to analyze the attitude of Spanish veterinary students toward ODT, because they may influence public opinion in the future, and to determine the factors that condition it. METHODS This was a sociologic, interdisciplinary, multicenter, observational study in Spain. The study population was students studying for a veterinary degree in Spain (n = 9000), and a sample of 2815 students (confidence of 99% and precision of ±1%) was stratified by geographic area and academic year. A validated questionnaire of attitude toward ODT (PCID-DTO-Ríos) was self-administered and anonymous. RESULTS Of the 2815 selected students (2790 plus the 0.9% per type of sample), 2650 completed the questionnaire (response rate, 94.14%): 83% (n = 2207) of the respondents were in favor of donation and 17% against. The following main variables were related to a favorable attitude: being female (odds ratio [OR], 0.752; P = .034); knowing a donor (OR, 1.834; P = .003); having discussed the matter with one's family (OR, 1.587; P = .002); having spoken about the subject in social circles with friends (OR, 1.633; P < .001), and being in favor of donating a deceased family member's organs (OR, 2.403; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Seventeen percent of Spanish veterinary students were not in favor of ODT. It is important to know the factors that determine their attitude, because this will make it possible to optimize the resources invested in campaigns to promote ODT and to take more specific action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Martínez-Alarcón
- Servicio de Cirugía, Unidad de Trasplantes, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain; International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain
| | - A Ríos
- Servicio de Cirugía, Unidad de Trasplantes, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain; International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain.
| | - G Ramis
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain; International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain; Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - J Gómez-Laguna
- Departament of Anatomy and Comparative Pathology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - X Moll
- Departamento de Medicina y Cirugía Animal, Facultad Veterinaria, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - V Falceto
- Departamento de Patología Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | - J J Quereda
- Grupo Fisiopatología de la Reproducción, Departamento Producción y Sanidad Animal, Salud Pública Veterinaria y Ciencia y Tecnología de los Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, Valencia, Spain
| | - J M Herrero-Medrano
- Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - L Mendonça
- Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiania, Brazil
| | - J L Martin-Barrasa
- Experimental Animal Facility, Research Unit, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria, Dr Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain; Animal Infectious Diseases and Ictiopatology, University Institute of Animal Health, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Arucas, Spain
| | - O M Fernández
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain; Animalario Libre de Patógenos Arrixaca-IMIB, Murcia, Spain
| | - A I López-Navas
- Servicio de Cirugía, Unidad de Trasplantes, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain; Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - A M Hernández
- Endocrinology and Nutrition Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - A Muñoz
- Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - P Ramírez
- Servicio de Cirugía, Unidad de Trasplantes, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain; International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain
| | - P Parrilla
- Servicio de Cirugía, Unidad de Trasplantes, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Martínez-Alarcón L, Ríos A, Ramis G, Gómez-Laguna J, Moll X, Falceto V, San Román-Acaso F, San Román-Llorens F, Quereda JJ, Herrero-Medrano JM, Mendonça L, Martin-Barrasa JL, Fernández OM, Hernández AM, Muñoz A, Ramírez P, Parrilla P. Veterinary Students' Attitude Toward Living Kidney Donation: A Multicenter Stratified Study From Spain. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:2280-2283. [PMID: 30316341 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.02.177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Living kidney related donations (LKRD) should be promoted because of the current deficit of organs for transplantation. The objective of the study was to analyze the attitude of Spanish veterinary students toward LKRD, because they may influence public opinion in the future, and to determine the factors that condition it. METHODS A sociological, interdisciplinary, multicenter, and observational study was carried out in the veterinary students enrolled in Spain (n = 9000) in the university academic year 2010-2011. A sample of 2815 students was stratified by geographical area and academic year. The students' attitude toward LKRD was assessed using a psychosocial validated questionnaire (PCID-DVR Rios), was self-administered, and was completed anonymously. Veterinary schools were randomly selected. The questionnaire was applied to each academic year at compulsory sessions. Statistical analysis was preformed using t test, χ2 test, and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS The completion rate was 95% (n = 2683); 93% (n = 2504) were in favor of LKRD and 36% (n = 945) supported unrelated living kidney donation. The following variables were associated with having a more favorable attitude: (1) sex (P < .001), (2) being a student of southern universities (P = .03), (3) attitude toward deceased donation (P < .001), (4) having a father (P < .001) or a mother (P < .001) in favor of organ donation, and (5) having discussed the subject with friends (P = .03) or family (P = .02). However, only 60% would accept a kidney from a relative. CONCLUSION Spanish veterinary students have a favorable attitude toward LKRD. However, only 60% would accept a kidney from a relative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Martínez-Alarcón
- International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain; Servicio de Cirugía, Unidad de Trasplantes, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - A Ríos
- International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain; Servicio de Cirugía, Unidad de Trasplantes, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
| | - G Ramis
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain; Servicio de Cirugía, Unidad de Trasplantes, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain; Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - J Gómez-Laguna
- Departament of Anatomy and Comparative Pathology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - X Moll
- Departamento de Medicina y Cirugía Animal, Facultad Veterinaria, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - V Falceto
- Universidad Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | - J J Quereda
- Grupo Fisiopatología de la Reproducción, Departamento Producción y Sanidad Animal, Salud Pública Veterinaria y Ciencia y Tecnología de los Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - J M Herrero-Medrano
- Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - L Mendonça
- Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiania, Brazil
| | - J L Martin-Barrasa
- Experimental Animal Facility, Research Unit, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria, Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain; Animal Infectious Diseases and Ictiopatology, University Institute of Animal Health (IUSA), University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Arucas, Spain
| | - O M Fernández
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain; Animalario libre de Patógenos Arrixaca-IMIB, Murcia, Spain
| | - A M Hernández
- Endocrinology and Nutrition Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - A Muñoz
- Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - P Ramírez
- International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain; Servicio de Cirugía, Unidad de Trasplantes, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - P Parrilla
- International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain; Servicio de Cirugía, Unidad de Trasplantes, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Martínez-Alarcón L, Ríos A, Ramis G, Gómez-Laguna J, Moll X, Falceto V, San Román-Acaso F, San Román-Llorens F, José Quereda J, Herrero-Medrano JM, Mendonça L, Martin-Barrasa JL, Fernández OM, López-Navas AI, Hernández AM, Muñoz A, Ramírez P, Parrilla P. Multicenter Stratified Study From Spain About Acceptance of Living Liver Donation Among Veterinarian Students. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:2272-2275. [PMID: 30316339 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.02.175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Veterinarians often hold decision-making positions in the public health care system, and therefore can influence public opinion about organ donation. The objective is to analyze the attitude of Spanish veterinarian students toward living liver donation (LLD) and to establish which factors have an influence on this attitude. METHODS A sociological, interdisciplinary, multicenter, and observational study was carried out in the veterinarian students enrolled in Spain (n = 9000) (university academic year 2010-2011). A sample of 2854 students was stratified by geographic area and academic year. A validated questionnaire (PCID-DVH RIOS) was self-administered and completed anonymously. The questionnaire was applied to each academic year at compulsory sessions at randomly selected veterinary schools. Statistical analysis included t test, χ2 test, and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Completion rate was 94% (n = 2683); 89% (n = 2345) were in favor of related LLD, and 40% (n = 1053) supported unrelated LLD. The following variables were associated with a more favorable attitude: (1) age (P < .001), (2) sex (P < .001), (3) academic year (P < .001), (4) believing in the possibility of needing a transplant oneself in the future (P < .001), (5) attitude toward deceased donation (P < .001), (6) attitude toward living kidney donation (P < .001), (7) acceptance of a donated liver segment from a family member if one were needed (P < .001), (8) having discussed the subject with one's family (P = .009) and friends (P < .001), (9) a partner's opinion about the subject (P = .002), and (10) fear of the possible mutilation of the body after donation (P < .001). CONCLUSION Spanish veterinary students have a favorable attitude toward LLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Martínez-Alarcón
- Servicio de Cirugía, Unidad de Trasplantes, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain; International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain
| | - A Ríos
- Servicio de Cirugía, Unidad de Trasplantes, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain; International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain.
| | - G Ramis
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain; International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain; Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - J Gómez-Laguna
- Department of Anatomy and Comparative Pathology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - X Moll
- Departamento de Medicina y Cirugía Animal, Facultad Veterinaria, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - V Falceto
- Universidad Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | - J José Quereda
- Grupo Fisiopatología de la Reproducción, Departamento Producción y Sanidad Animal, Salud Pública Veterinaria y Ciencia y Tecnología de los Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - J M Herrero-Medrano
- Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - L Mendonça
- Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiania, Brazil
| | - J L Martin-Barrasa
- Experimental Animal Facility, Research Unit, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria, Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Arucas, Spain; Animal Infectious Diseases and Ictiopatology, University Institute of Animal Health (IUSA), University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Arucas, Spain
| | - O M Fernández
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain; Animalario libre de Patógenos Arrixaca-IMIB, Murcia, Spain
| | - A I López-Navas
- International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain; Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - A M Hernández
- Endocrinology and Nutrition Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - A Muñoz
- Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - P Ramírez
- Servicio de Cirugía, Unidad de Trasplantes, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain; International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain
| | - P Parrilla
- Servicio de Cirugía, Unidad de Trasplantes, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ríos A, Martínez-Alarcón L, Ramírez P, Sánchez J, Jarvis N, Rodríguez MM, Cascales P, Fernández OM, Parrilla P. Irish Residents in Southeastern Spain: In Search of Favorable Groups to Encourage Living Kidney Donation in Spain. Transplant Proc 2007; 39:2068-71. [PMID: 17889098 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There has been an increase in the population resident in southeast Spain originating from the British Isles, among them Irish citizens. Living kidney donation rates are currently low in Spain. In an attempt to increase these rates, a search is underway to find groups who are favorable toward this type of donation especially from those countries with high levels of living kidney donation. The objective of this study was to analyze the attitudes toward living kidney donation among the population group originating from Ireland (including Northern Ireland) and who live in southeast Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS A random sample (n = 325) of the population in southeast Spain (Autonomous Community of Murcia) who were born in Ireland completed a validated questionnaire to measure attitudes. The questionnaire was self-administered and was completed anonymously between November 2005 and March 2006. Spanish citizens from an urban and a rural area were used as control groups (n = 500). RESULTS The questionnaire completion rate was 81% (n = 262) including 87% (n = 229) of respondents in favor of living related donation and 13% (n = 94) against it. The attitude was similar to that of the urban Spanish control group (87% vs 89%; P = .5832) and more favorable than that of the rural area (87% vs 29%; P < 0.001). With respect to living donation for monetary incentives, 7% (n = 16) reported that they would donate an organ while alive for money, although this would depend on the quantity of money offered; 4% (n = 10) would need to think about it; while the vast majority (81%; n = 212) would never donate an organ in life for money. The following variables influenced attitudes toward living kidney donation: respondent sex (P = .023); previous experience with the donation and transplantation process (P = .004); participation in prosocial activities (P = .016); religion (P = .003); partner's attitude toward the matter (P = .020); concern about "mutilation" after donation (P < .001); and belief that living kidney donation is a risk for the patient (P = .003). CONCLUSION Irish citizens living in southeast Spain showed a favorable attitude toward related living kidney donation. Therefore, they are a priority group to whom the option of living kidney donation should be offered when a kidney transplant is needed by an Irish person.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ríos
- Coordinación Regional de Transplantes de la Comunidad Autónoma de Murcia, Consejería de Sanidad, Murcia, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nannini LJ, Zaietta GA, Guerrera AJ, Varela JA, Fernández OM, Flores DM. Breath-holding test in subjects with near-fatal asthma. A new index for dyspnea perception. Respir Med 2006; 101:246-53. [PMID: 16824744 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2006] [Revised: 05/07/2006] [Accepted: 05/16/2006] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE Identification of asthmatic subjects with low perception of dyspnea (POD) that are at higher risk of hospitalization, near-fatal and fatal asthma could improve their management. OBJECTIVE Create a simple procedure that facilitate the recognition of low POD. METHODS We enrolled near fatal asthma (NFA) subjects and a wide spectrum of non-NFA subjects. Each subject was asked to stop breathing at end-expiration. Dyspnea was assesssed by a modified Borg scale. To design the new index, we combined the Borg score at the end of the voluntary breath-holding maneuver with the airway limitation. The equation was as follows: FEV(1)/FVC%/(breath-holding time in seconds/final Borg score minus basal Borg score). RESULTS Eleven NFA subjects (4 females) aged 21-73yr and 55 non-NFA (14 severe, 18 moderate and 23 mild asthmatic subjects) completed the study. The threshold value of the index that could predict POD is <12. The mean (+/-sd) of the new index perception was significantly lower in NFA group (n=11; 5.21+/-3.59; vs. n=55; 13.67+/-11.08; P=0.006). This threshold value had 100% sensitivity and it best discriminated between mild and NFA groups. The negative likelihood ratio (when the index > or = 12) was zero. A result > or = 12 represented an almost null probability of poor POD. CONCLUSION The breath-holding test is simple and rapid. Its negative likelihood ratio was zero. Accordingly, a test result of 12 or greater might exclude the probability of poor perception of dyspnea in subjects with stable asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L J Nannini
- Servicio de Neumonología, Hospital de G Baigorria, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Argentina.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Conesa C, Ríos A, Ramírez P, Sánchez J, Sánchez E, Rodríguez MM, Martínez L, Fernández OM, Ramos F, Montoya MJ, Parrilla P. Attitudes of Primary Care Professionals in Spain Toward Xenotransplantation. Transplant Proc 2006; 38:853-7. [PMID: 16647491 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.02.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The deficit in transplantable organs is making it necessary to find alternative sources. One possibility is xenotransplantation. However, the use of animal organs may be rejected by society and among health professionals. Primary Care is fundamental for promoting matters of health; in Spain it has access to nearly 100% of the population. Our objective was to analyze the acceptance of this therapy, although it is experimental, among Primary Care professionals, given that they are the ones most involved in spreading information about this therapy if it was confirmed to be useful. MATERIALS AND METHODS A random sample was stratified by sex, job category, and geographical location among Primary Care personnel, including 428 professionals in 32 health centers among population of 2851 professionals. Attitudes toward xenotransplantation were evaluated using a questionnaire on psychosocial attitudes validated in our geographical area. Contact was made in each center with the Doctor Coordinator for doctors, the Nursing Coordinator for nurses, and an Administrative Officer for ancillary personnel. The chi-square test and Student t test were applied to evaluate categorical and continuous data, respectively. RESULTS Attitudes toward xenotransplantation were similar to those obtained in human organs: favorable in 79% (n = 325), whereas 19% (n = 78) had doubts and 2% (n = 10) were against. The attitude was more favorable in men (89% vs 72%; P < .000), those who had cared for transplant patients (84% vs 71%; P = .009), those with previous experience in organ donation and transplantation (84% vs 75%; P = .033), those with an attitude in favor of cadaveric organ donation (83% vs 66%; P < .0001), and those in favor of living donation of the kidney (P < .000) or the liver (P < .000), as well as those who believed that they may need a transplant at some time in the future (84% vs 74%; P = .045). There was a clear difference in attitude according to job category (P = .018): approval rates were 89% for doctors, 76% for nurses, and 70% for ancillary personnel. CONCLUSIONS Attitudes toward future application of xenotransplantation were quite positive among doctors. However, the attitudes of nursing and ancillary personnel were similar to those of the general population. The main factors related to such an attitude depended mainly on the previous relationship and attitude of the respondent toward human organ donation and transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Conesa
- Coordinación Regional de Trasplantes de la Comunidad Autónoma de Murcia, Consejería de Sanidad, Murcia, España
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ríos A, Conesa C, Ramírez P, Galindo PJ, Martínez L, Fernández OM, Montoya MJ, Rodríguez MM, Lucas D, Parrilla P. Ancillary Hospital Personnel Faced With Organ Donation and Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2006; 38:858-62. [PMID: 16647492 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To reduce the number of family organ donation refusals, it is necessary not only to act on the general public but also on the health care system. In this respect, there are data suggesting that the percentage of hospital personnel against donation is high, especially among ancillary personnel. The objective herein was to analyze the attitudes of ancillary hospital professionals toward donation of their own organs and determine factors that conditioned such attitudes. MATERIALS AND METHODS A random sample in a third-level hospital with a solid organ transplant program was stratified by ancillary services: administrative, porters, maintenance, cleaning, and cooking. Attitudes toward donation of one's own organs after death were evaluated using a questionnaire on psychosocial aspects validated in our area. It included various psychosocial variables that could affect such attitudes. The Student t test and chi-square test were used to evaluate the data. RESULTS We analyzed 277 respondents of mean age 43 +/- 8 years and 96% women. The level of acceptance of organ donation was 64% (n = 178), whereas 46% were either against or undecided (n = 98). The variables which determined the attitudes were understanding of brain death (P = .004); attitude toward cadaveric manipulation, especially toward autopsy (P = .013) and cremation (P = .004); concern about mutilation after donation (P = .014); religion (P = .032); partner's attitude toward donation (P < .0001); and possibility of needing an organ in the future (P = .031). CONCLUSIONS Ancillary hospital personnel had similar attitudes toward donation as those of the general public as observed in other studies. The attitudes were determined by many psychosocial factors. A campaign to raise awareness among professionals has become a priority, given that working in a hospital, their unfavorable attitude could have a strong negative impact on the general public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ríos
- Departamento de Cirugía, Unidad de Trasplantes, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, España.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ramírez P, Montoya MJ, Ríos A, García Palenciano C, Majado M, Chávez R, Muñoz A, Fernández OM, Sánchez A, Segura B, Sansano T, Acosta F, Robles R, Sánchez F, Fuente T, Cascales P, González F, Ruiz D, Martínez L, Pons JA, Rodríguez JI, Yélamos J, Cowan P, d'Apice A, Parrilla P. Prevention of hyperacute rejection in a model of orthotopic liver xenotransplantation from pig to baboon using polytransgenic pig livers (CD55, CD59, and H-transferase). Transplant Proc 2006; 37:4103-6. [PMID: 16386637 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.09.186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The search for alternative sources for transplant organs leads us to the search for animals as an inexhaustible source of organs. The objective of this study was to analyze whether livers from polytransgenic pigs expressing the human complement regulatory proteins CD55 (hDAF), CD59, and alfa alpha1,2-fucosyltransferase (H-transferase), protected against hyperacute rejection after orthotopic liver xenotransplantation to a baboon and also to study pig liver function in a nonhuman primate. MATERIALS AND METHODS Nine liver transplants from pig to baboon were divided into two groups: a control group (n = 4) of genetically unmodified pigs and an experimental group (n = 5) of pigs transgenic for CD55, CD59, and H-transferase as donors. All the donating piglets obtained through hysterectomy were maintained in specific pathogen-free conditions. The selection of transgenic pig donors followed demonstration of transgene expression using monoclonal antibodies (antiCD55, antiCD59) and immunohistological studies on liver biopsies. RESULTS All animals in the control group developed hyperacute rejection with survival rates less than 16 hours without function of transplanted livers. In the experimental group none of the animals suffered hyperacute rejection. Survival in this group was between 13 and 24 hours. The livers were functional, producing bile and maintaining above 35% prothrombin activity. Only in one case was there primary dysfunction of the xenograft. CONCLUSION Polytransgenic livers for complement regulatory proteins prevent hyperacute rejection when xenotransplanted into a baboon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Ramírez
- Liver Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Virgen Arrixaca University Hospital, Murcia, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fernández OM, Ríos A, Sánchez A, Palenciano CG, Martínez L, Conesa C, Montoya M, Pons JA, Ramírez P, Parrilla P. Pathology findings in a model of auxiliary liver transplantation with portal vein arterialization in pigs. Transplant Proc 2006; 37:3939-42. [PMID: 16386591 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.10.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the histological findings and temporal evolution that occur in auxiliary liver grafts as a consequence of arterialization of the portal vein (PVA). MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated 10 auxiliary heterotopic liver transplants with arterialization of the PVA. The histological study was performed using an optical microscope to process liver samples with staining using hematoxylin and eosin. A biopsy of native liver tissue was used as a control. RESULTS Two animals were excluded from the study, one due to ischemic necrosis of the graft and one that died 4 hours after transplant. All of the remaining eight animals underwent a histological study at 1 day, 7 days, and 14 days. The most significant histological findings were: (1) dilation of portal areas and sinusoids, which were detected at 24 hours and persisted; (2) thickening of the interlobular septum, which was observed after day 7 and progressively increased to day 14; (3) bile duct hyperplasia detected at the seventh day. CONCLUSIONS The consistent, early findings in a pig liver with PVA included vascular dilation of the portal area and the sinusoids, with bile duct hyperplasia extending progressively and the thickening of interlobular connective tissue septa with a generalized perilobular connective tissue reaction, which did not seem to alter the internal structure of the lobule, which showed histologically normal hepatocytes. The fibrous reaction may be the first stage in chronic hepatopathy. Further long-term studies are required in this model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O M Fernández
- Unit of Experimental Surgery, Department of Surgery, Arrixaca University Hospital, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ríos A, Conesa C, Ramírez P, Galindo PJ, Fernández OM, Rodríguez MM, Parrilla P. Attitude Survey of Hospital Workers in the Surgical Services Toward Living Kidney Donation. Transplant Proc 2005; 37:3621-5. [PMID: 16386486 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.09.173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A living donor kidney is currently the most accepted kind of solid organ donation, given the low level of morbidity and mortality and the good results in the recipient. In Spain, its use is still scarce; even many health service workers are not in favor. Our objective was to analyze the attitudes toward living kidney donation in a surgical department. MATERIALS AND METHODS A random sample was stratified according to surgical services and job category in a tertiary hospital with an solid organ transplant program. Attitudes toward living kidney donation were evaluated using a questionnaire on donation and transplantation, which evaluated various psychosocial variables. Student's t test and the Chi square test were used. RESULTS Two hundred sixty-three respondents of mean age 40 +/- 10 years were analysed for attitudes toward living kidney donation. The level of acceptance was 87% (n = 229) versus 13% undecided or against the procedure (n = 34). No differences were observed according to job category. The variables that showed a relationship with the attitude were the partner's attitude toward donation (P = .049); the possible need for an organ oneself (P = .0001); and belief that medical errors occur (P = .001). The attitude toward cadaveric organ donation was not reflective of that toward living kidney donation (P = .241). CONCLUSIONS A favorable attitude toward living kidney donation was high among hospital staff of the surgical department. Those for whom it was not favorable were influenced by personal factors such as partner's attitude and the possibility of needing a kidney in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ríos
- Coordinación Regional de Trasplantes de la Comunidad Autónoma de Murcia, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Martínez-Alarcón L, Ríos A, Conesa C, Alcaraz J, González MJ, Montoya M, Fernández OM, Pons JA, Ramírez P, Parrilla P. Attitude Toward Living Related Donation of Patients on the Waiting List for a Deceased Donor Solid Organ Transplant. Transplant Proc 2005; 37:3614-7. [PMID: 16386484 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.08.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spain is the country with the highest rate of donation from deceased individuals. However, given the deficit in organs, living donation is being encouraged. Our objective was to analyze attitudes toward living donation among patients on the waiting list for a transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients on the waiting list for a kidney or liver transplant (n = 96; 46 kidney and 50 liver) in the last year had their attitudes toward living donation evaluated through a psychosocial survey performed in a direct interview with an independent health professional from the transplant unit and analyzed by Student t test and the chi-square test. RESULTS Ninety-one percent were in favor of donating their organs when they die, 6% had doubts, and the remaining 3% were against it. Twenty percent would accept living donation from a family member (32% in liver vs 7% in kidney; P < .05), despite 89% of them accepting that there would be a risk to the family member. Twenty percent reported that a family member had suggested donating, but the patient was opposed. Finally, only 6% considered living donation to be their first choice, 42% did not consider this option. Up to 96% would donate an organ to a family member if they were requested to do so. CONCLUSION Patients on the waiting list are not favorable to living related donation for themselves, although members of their family have proposed it to them. However, the liver patient is more prepared to accept it, possibly because that patient has no other alternative as do kidney patients have dialysis. Even so, they are favorable toward donating a living organ if a family member were to request one. In general, living donation is not being proposed to these patients as a real option, partly because of their doctors.
Collapse
|
16
|
Martínez-Alarcón L, Ríos A, Conesa C, Alcaraz J, González MJ, Montoya M, Fernández OM, Majado M, Ramírez P, Parrilla P. Attitude Toward Xenotransplantation in Kidney and Liver Patients on the Transplant Waiting List. Transplant Proc 2005; 37:4107-10. [PMID: 16386638 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.09.187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The deficit in transplant organs is encouraging research into stem cells and xenotransplantation. However, many studies have shown that using animals for human transplantation could be rejected by society. The objective here was to analyze the attitude of patients on the waiting list toward a possible transplant of an organ of animal origin. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients on the waiting list for kidney and liver transplants including last year (n = 96) underwent a direct interview by an independent health professional from the transplant unit. Using a psychosocial survey, an evaluation was made of attitudes toward donation of organs of animal origin and its various options. Student t test and the chi-square test were used for analysis. RESULTS If results from xenotransplantation could be superimposed onto those of human transplantation, 71% would accept such an organ. In the case of the kidney, 83% would accept, 4% would not, and 13% have doubts; as opposed to 60%, 12%, and 28%, respectively, of liver cases (P < .05). Supposing that the results were worse than in human organs, only 26% would accept an animal organ. Thus, for kidney, 33% would accept it, 48% would not, and 20% would have doubts; and for liver, it would be 20%, 50%, and 30%, respectively. In a life-threatening situation 98% would accept an animal organ as a bridge of hope in the wait for a human organ. In addition, if the organ functioned correctly, 98% would keep the animal organ, thus avoiding an intervention to substitute a human organ. CONCLUSION If xenotransplantation became a clinical reality, acceptance of an animal organ by patients on the waiting list would be low, especially if the results could not be superimposed onto human ones. Only its use as a bridge until the arrival of a human organ would increase its acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Martínez-Alarcón
- Coordinación Regional de Trasplantes, Consejería de Sanidad, Murcia, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Conesa C, Ríos A, Ramírez P, Sánchez J, Sánchez E, Fernández OM, Rodríguez MM, Ramos F, Parrilla P. Rural Primary Care Centers as a Source of Information About Organ Donation. Transplant Proc 2005; 37:3609-13. [PMID: 16386483 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.08.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Primary care is an important way of promoting health in the community, and this includes organ donation. In rural areas, this way of promoting health acquires special importance. Our objective was to analyze attitudes toward organ donation among primary care workers in rural health centers to assess their importance in circulating information about donation. MATERIALS AND METHODS A random sample, stratified according to job category among the primary care staff (n = 160), of workers in rural areas in our autonomous community (population < 10,000 inhabitants), evaluated attitudes toward donation using a questionnaire validated in our geographic area. To distribute the questionnaire it was necessary to contact the following in each health center: the coordinating physician, the nursing coordinator, and an administrative worker. RESULTS Of those questioned, 78% (n = 124) were in favor of donation, as opposed to 22% (n = 36) who are against it or undecided. As for the job category, physicians and nurses showed a more favorable attitude than nonhealth workers (90% and 80% vs 61%; P = .000). The psychosocial variables that were related to such an attitude were knowledge of the concept of brain death (P = .013) and lack of fear of manipulation of the deceased person (P = .002). Regarding information about organ donation and transplantation, 54% (n = 86) reported having been provided favorable information, with up to a quarter of the physicians considering other programs to be of greater interest for primary care than organ donation and transplantation. CONCLUSION Attitudes toward organ donation were favorable among a high percentage of primary care workers in rural centers; more than 50% have circulated favorable information on the subject. However, there is a high percentage with a negative or undecided attitude, especially among nonhealth workers, which should be reversed with promotional activities at the level of the health center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Conesa
- Coordinación Regional de Trasplantes de la Comunidad Autónoma de Murcia, Consejería de Sanidad, Ronda de Levante, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|