The current best drug treatment for hypertensive heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

More than 90 % of patients developing heart failure (HF) have hypertension. The most frequent concomitant conditions are type-2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, atrial fibrillation, and coronary disease. HF outcome research focuses on decreasing mortality and preventing hospitalization for worsening HF syndrome. All drugs that decrease these HF endpoints lower blood pressure. Current drug treatments for HF are (i) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, (ii) selected beta-blockers, (iii) steroidal and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and (iv) sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. For various reasons, these drug treatments were first studied in HF patients with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Subsequently, they have been investigated in HF patients with a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, HFpEF) of mostly hypertensive etiology, and with modest benefits largely assessed on top of background treatment with the drugs already proven effective in HFrEF. Additionally, diuretics are given on symptomatic indications. Patients with HFpEF may have diastolic dysfunction but also systolic dysfunction visualized by lack of longitudinal shortening. Considering the totality of evidence and the overall need for antihypertensive treatment and/or treatment of hypertensive complications in almost all HF patients, the principal drug treatment of HF appears to be the same regardless of LVEF. Rather than LVEF-guided treatment of HF, treatment of HF should be directed by symptoms (related to the level of fluid retention), signs (tachycardia), severity (NYHA functional class), and concomitant diseases and conditions. All HF patients should be given all the drug classes mentioned above if well tolerated.

Non-invasive myocardial work in aortic stenosis: validation and improvement in left ventricular pressure estimation

AIMS

The non-invasive myocardial work index (MWI) has been validated in patients without aortic stenosis (AS). A thorough assessment of methodological limitations is warranted before this index can be applied to patients with AS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We simultaneously measured left ventricular pressure (LVP) by using a micromanometer-tipped catheter and obtained echocardiograms in 20 patients with severe AS. We estimated LVP curves and calculated pressure-strain loops using three different models: (i) the model validated in patients without AS; (ii) the same model, but with pressure at the aortic valve opening (AVO) adjusted to diastolic cuff pressure; and (iii) a new model based on the invasive measurements from patients with AS. Valvular events were determined by echocardiography. Peak LVP was estimated as the sum of the mean aortic transvalvular gradient and systolic cuff pressure. In same-beat comparisons between invasive and estimated LVP curves, Model 1 significantly overestimated early systolic pressure by 61 ± 5 mmHg at AVO compared with Models 2 and 3. However, the average correlation coefficients between estimated and invasive LVP traces were excellent for all models, and the overestimation had limited influence on MWI, with excellent correlation (r = 0.98, P < 0.001) and good agreement between the MWI calculated with estimated (all models) and invasive LVP.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the validity of the non-invasive MWI in patients with AS. The accuracy of estimated LVP curves improved when matching AVO to the diastolic pressure in the original model, mirroring that of the AS-specific model. This may sequentially enhance the accuracy of regional MWI assessment.

What Is the Current Best Drug Treatment for Hypertensive Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction? Review of the Totality of Evidence

BACKGROUND

More than 90% of patients developing heart failure (HF) have an epidemiological background of hypertension. The most frequent concomitant conditions are type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, atrial fibrillation, and coronary disease, all disorders/diseases closely related to hypertension.

METHODS

HF outcome research focuses on decreasing mortality and preventing hospitalization for worsening HF syndrome. All drugs that decrease these HF endpoints lower blood pressure. Current drug treatments for HF are (i) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, (ii) selected beta-blockers, (iii) steroidal and nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and (iv) sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors.

RESULTS

For various reasons, these drug treatments were first studied in HF patients with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, subsequently, they have been investigated and, as we see it, documented as beneficial in HF patients with a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, HFpEF) and mostly hypertensive etiology, with effect estimates assessed partly on top of background treatment with the drugs already proven effective in HFrEF. Additionally, diuretics are given on symptomatic indications.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the totality of evidence and the overall need for antihypertensive treatment and/or treatment of hypertensive complications in almost all HF patients, the principal drug treatment of HF appears to be the same regardless of LVEF. Rather than LVEF-guided treatment of HF, treatment of HF should be directed by symptoms (related to the level of fluid retention), signs (tachycardia), severity (NYHA functional class), and concomitant diseases and conditions. All HF patients should be given all the drug classes mentioned above if well tolerated.

Imaging in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: part 2-imaging after device implantation. A clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) improve quality of life and prolong survival, but there are additional considerations for cardiovascular imaging after implantation-both for standard indications and for diagnosing and guiding management of device-related complications. This clinical consensus statement (part 2) from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association, provides comprehensive, up-to-date, and evidence-based guidance to cardiologists, cardiac imagers, and pacing specialists regarding the use of imaging in patients after implantation of conventional pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. The document summarizes the existing evidence regarding the role and optimal use of various cardiac imaging modalities in patients with suspected CIED-related complications and also discusses CRT optimization, the safety of magnetic resonance imaging in CIED carriers, and describes the role of chest radiography in assessing CIED type, position, and complications. The role of imaging before and during CIED implantation is discussed in a companion document (part 1).

Imaging in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: part 1-imaging before and during device implantation. A clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC

More than 500 000 cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are implanted in the European Society of Cardiology countries each year. The role of cardiovascular imaging in patients being considered for CIED is distinctly different from imaging in CIED recipients. In the former group, imaging can help identify specific or potentially reversible causes of heart block, the underlying tissue characteristics associated with malignant arrhythmias, and the mechanical consequences of conduction delays and can also aid challenging lead placements. On the other hand, cardiovascular imaging is required in CIED recipients for standard indications and to assess the response to device implantation, to diagnose immediate and delayed complications after implantation, and to guide device optimization. The present clinical consensus statement (Part 1) from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association, provides comprehensive, up-to-date, and evidence-based guidance to cardiologists, cardiac imagers, and pacing specialists regarding the use of imaging in patients undergoing implantation of conventional pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and resynchronization therapy devices. The document summarizes the existing evidence regarding the use of imaging in patient selection and during the implantation procedure and also underlines gaps in evidence in the field. The role of imaging after CIED implantation is discussed in the second document (Part 2).

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Identifies Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with an Assessment of Septal Scar and Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony

Background: The response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) depends on septal viability and correction of abnormal septal motion. This study investigates if cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as a single modality can identify CRT responders with combined imaging of pathological septal motion (septal flash) and septal scar. Methods: In a prospective, multicenter, observational study of 136 CRT recipients, septal scar was assessed using late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (n = 127) and septal flash visually from cine CMR sequences. The primary endpoint was CRT response, defined as ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume with echocardiography after 6 months. The secondary endpoint was heart transplantation or death of any cause assessed after 39 ± 13 months. Results: Septal scar and septal flash were independent predictors of CRT response in multivariable analysis (both p < 0.001), while QRS duration and morphology were not. The combined approach of septal scar and septal flash predicted CRT response with an area under the curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-0.94) and was a strong predictor of long-term survival without heart transplantation (hazard ratio 0.27, 95% CI: 0.10-0.79). The accuracy of the approach was similar in the subgroup with intermediate (130-150 ms) QRS duration. The combined approach was superior to septal scar and septal flash alone (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The combined assessment of septal scar and septal flash using CMR as a single-image modality identifies CRT responders with high accuracy and predicts long-term survival.

Phenotyping heart failure by echocardiography: imaging of ventricular function and haemodynamics at rest and exercise

Traditionally, congestive heart failure (HF) was phenotyped by echocardiography or other imaging techniques according to left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF). The more recent echocardiographic modality speckle tracking strain is complementary to LVEF, as it is more sensitive to diagnose mild systolic dysfunction. Furthermore, when LV systolic dysfunction is associated with a small, hypertrophic ventricle, EF is often normal or supernormal, whereas LV global longitudinal strain can reveal reduced contractility. In addition, segmental strain patterns may be used to identify specific cardiomyopathies, which in some cases can be treated with patient-specific medicine. In HF with preserved EF (HFpEF), a diagnostic hallmark is elevated LV filling pressure, which can be diagnosed with good accuracy by applying a set of echocardiographic parameters. Patients with HFpEF often have normal filling pressure at rest, and a non-invasive or invasive diastolic stress test may be used to identify abnormal elevation of filling pressure during exercise. The novel parameter LV work index, which incorporates afterload, is a promising tool for quantification of LV contractile function and efficiency. Another novel modality is shear wave imaging for diagnosing stiff ventricles, but clinical utility remains to be determined. In conclusion, echocardiographic imaging of cardiac function should include LV strain as a supplementary method to LVEF. Echocardiographic parameters can identify elevated LV filling pressure with good accuracy and may be applied in the diagnostic workup of patients suspected of HFpEF.

Mechanical Dyssynchrony Combined with Septal Scarring Reliably Identifies Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Background and aim: The presence of mechanical dyssynchrony on echocardiography is associated with reverse remodelling and decreased mortality after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Contrarily, myocardial scar reduces the effect of CRT. This study investigated how well a combined assessment of different markers of mechanical dyssynchrony and scarring identifies CRT responders. Methods: In a prospective multicentre study of 170 CRT recipients, septal flash (SF), apical rocking (ApRock), systolic stretch index (SSI), and lateral-to-septal (LW-S) work differences were assessed using echocardiography. Myocardial scarring was quantified using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) or excluded based on a coronary angiogram and clinical history. The primary endpoint was a CRT response, defined as a ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume 12 months after implantation. The secondary endpoint was time-to-death. Results: The combined assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony and septal scarring showed AUCs ranging between 0.81 (95%CI: 0.74-0.88) and 0.86 (95%CI: 0.79-0.91) for predicting a CRT response, without significant differences between the markers, but significantly higher than mechanical dyssynchrony alone. QRS morphology, QRS duration, and LV ejection fraction were not superior in their prediction. Predictive power was similar in the subgroups of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The combined assessments significantly predicted all-cause mortality at 44 ± 13 months after CRT with a hazard ratio ranging from 0.28 (95%CI: 0.12-0.67) to 0.20 (95%CI: 0.08-0.49). Conclusions: The combined assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony and septal scarring identified CRT responders with high predictive power. Both visual and quantitative markers were highly feasible and demonstrated similar results. This work demonstrates the value of imaging LV mechanics and scarring in CRT candidates, which can already be achieved in a clinical routine.

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Diastolic Function in Special Populations

Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction results from a combination of impaired relaxation, reduced restoring forces, and increased chamber stiffness. Noninvasive assessment of diastology uses a multiparametric approach involving surrogate markers of increased filling pressures, which include mitral inflow, septal and lateral annular velocities, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, and left atrial volume index. However, these parameters must be used cautiously. This is because the traditional algorithms for evaluating diastolic function and estimation of LV filling pressures (LVFPs), as recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging 2016 guidelines, do not apply to unique patients with underlying cardiomyopathies, significant valvular disease, conduction abnormalities, arrhythmias, LV assist devices, and heart transplants, which alter the relation between the conventional indexes of diastolic function and LVFP. The purpose of this review is to provide solutions for evaluating LVFP through illustrative examples of these special populations, incorporating supplemental Doppler indexes, such as isovolumic relaxation time, mitral deceleration time, and pulmonary venous flow analysis, as needed to formulate a more comprehensive approach.

Scar imaging in the dyssynchronous left ventricle: Accuracy of myocardial metabolism by positron emission tomography and function by echocardiographic strain

PURPOSE

Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is reduced in patients with high left ventricular (LV) scar burden, in particular when scar is located in the LV lateral wall or septum. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can identity scar, but is not feasible in all patients. This study investigates if myocardial metabolism by ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and contractile function by echocardiographic strain are alternatives to LGE-CMR.

METHODS

In a prospective multicenter study, 132 CRT candidates (91% with left bundle branch block) were studied by speckle tracking strain echocardiography, and 53 of these by FDG-PET. Regional myocardial FDG metabolism and peak systolic strain were compared to LGE-CMR as reference method.

RESULTS

Reduced FDG metabolism (<70% relative) precisely identified transmural scars (≥50% of myocardial volume) in the LV lateral wall, with area under the curve (AUC) 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-1.00). Reduced contractile function by strain identified transmural scars in the LV lateral wall with only moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.77, CI 0.71-0.84). However, absolute peak systolic strain >10% could rule out transmural scar with high sensitivity (80%) and high negative predictive value (96%). Neither FDG-PET nor strain identified septal scars (for both, AUC < 0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

In CRT candidates, FDG-PET is an excellent alternative to LGE-CMR to identify scar in the LV lateral wall. Furthermore, preserved strain in the LV lateral wall has good accuracy to rule out transmural scar. None of the modalities can identify septal scar.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The present study is part of the clinical study "Contractile Reserve in Dyssynchrony: A Novel Principle to Identify Candidates for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRID-CRT)", which was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT02525185).

Resynchronization of the left atrium may play an important role in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Introduction

Left atrial (LA) dyssynchrony is a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). It is unknown, however, if LA resynchronization contributes to response to CRT. We hypothesize that there is a relationship between correction of LA dyssynchrony and response to CRT.

Purpose

To investigate the association between LA resynchronization and response to CRT.

Methods

In a prospective study of 171 heart failure patients with LBBB, myocardial strain was measured by speckle-tracking echocardiography, before and 6 months after CRT. As indicated by the white arrows in Figure 1, LA dyssynchrony was measured as the time delay between onset systolic stretch of the interatrial septum and the LA lateral wall. Response to CRT was defined as at least 15% reduction in left ventricular (LV) end systolic volume at 6 months follow up.

Results

119 (70%) patients responded to CRT. The panels in Figure 1 shows LA strain traces in a representative LBBB patient that did respond (upper panels), and a patient that did not respond (lower panels). The white arrows in the left panels indicate that both the responder and the non-responder had marked LA dyssynchrony before CRT (198 and 171 ms, respectively). However, after 6 months with CRT, there was recovery of LA synchrony only in the responder (time delay −40 ms), and still marked LA dyssynchrony of 191 ms in the non-responder (right panels).

Figure 2 confirms similar results for the whole study population: CRT response was associated with marked reduction of LA dyssynchrony (p=0.0001). In the CRT non-responders there was, however, only a modest, non-significant reduction of LA dyssynchrony.

Conclusions

Positive CRT response was associated with resynchronization of the left atrium. These findings suggest LA resynchronization as a potential additional target for CRT.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Institute for Surgical Research, Oslo University HospitalThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital

A deep learning approach for automatic echocardiographic right ventricular strain measurements using a limited dataset

Background

Speckle tracking echocardiography provides quantification of myocardial deformation and is useful in the assessment of myocardial function. Right ventricular (RV) strain has been suggested as a sensitive tool for diagnosing cardiomyopathies and assessing long term patient outcomes for patients with pulmonary hypertension, severe tricuspid regurgitation and COVID-19 infection. Recent advances in deep learning (DL) have made promising advances in automating the labour-intensive delineation of regions of interest (ROIs). However, compared to echocardiograms with left ventricular (LV) strain, RV strain data is scarce, making DL models difficult to train.

Purpose

To investigate whether annotated LV strain data could be beneficial in training a DL model for automatic RV strain when using a limited RV dataset.

Methods

The dataset consisted of anonymized still frames from 141 echocardiograms of the RV in the RV-focused 4 chamber view with corresponding cardiologist-defined ROI. Exams included healthy subjects and patients with heart failure, valvular disease, and conduction abnormalities. ROIs and still images were extracted at the mid-systole, and then quality assessed by an experienced cardiologist as high, medium, or low. The dataset was randomly split into 68%/17%/15% sets for training, validation, and testing. A convolutional neural network for image segmentation (U-Net) with a residual neural network (ResNet50) encoder was used, with a combination of binary cross entropy and Dice loss functions. Augmentation, predefined ImageNet weights and pre-training were also employed. For pre-training, 715 still images in the apical 4 chamber view with LV defined ROIs were used, both in their original and horizontally flipped view. Predicted ROIs were reintroduced into commercially available echocardiogram analysis software to automatically calculate longitudinal strain (LS) values.

Results

The model pre-trained with the flipped LV images achieved the highest performance with a mean absolute difference of 1.26 percentage points (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62–1.89 percentage points) between manually measured and DL-assisted LS. Median absolute LS difference was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.28–1.57) percentage points. A Bland-Altman plot revealed two outliers and no obvious trends. In comparison, the mean and median absolute LS differences for the model without pre-training were 1.87 (95% CI: 0.73–3.00) and 1.09 (95% CI: 0.56–1.63) percentage points, respectively.

Conclusions

The current study demonstrates that DL-assisted, automated RV strain measurement is feasible even with a small dataset, and that performance can be increased by using images annotated for LV strain. While the majority of the predicted RV strain results were within the typical range of intra- and interobserver variability, a few outliers were observed. These outliers could possibly be avoided with the use of larger datasets.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Research council of Norway

Combined assessment of septal scar and septal flash by cardiac magnetic resonance identifies responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority. Research grants of the University of Leuven.

Background

Left ventricular (LV) scar, particularly in the lateral wall and septum, reduces response rate to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), whereas a dyssynchronous LV contraction pattern (septal flash) suggests good response. Lateral wall scar abolishes septal flash. Therefore, a combined approach of septal scar and septal flash may characterize the myocardial substrate responsive to CRT. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may assess both scar and contraction pattern.

Purpose

The present study aimed to determine if combined assessment of septal scar and septal flash by CMR as single image modality identifies responders to CRT.

Methods

We investigated all CRT recipients with available CMR from a prospective, multicenter study (n = 136), with both ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure. Septal scar was assessed by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) from a stack of short axis slices (n = 128) and septal flash determined visually on ordinary cine sequences (n = 136). CRT response was defined as ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume by echocardiography at 6 months follow-up. We also assessed heart transplantation or death of any cause 39 ± 13 months after device implantation.

Results

In multivariate analysis including percentage septal scar (LGE), septal flash, QRS-duration and QRS-morphology, septal LGE and septal flash were the only independent predictors of CRT response (both p &lt; 0.001). A combined approach of septal LGE and septal flash predicted CRT response with area under the curve 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-0.94) and long-term survival without heart transplantation with hazard ratio 0.18 (95% CI: 0.05-0.61).

A practical approach to selection of CRT candidates by septal LGE and septal flash is illustrated in the present figure. As shown, absence of septal LGE indicated excellent response rate (93%) to CRT independent of other parameters. When septal LGE was present, however, overall response rate was substantially lower (58%), but presence or absence of septal flash separated responders from non-responders with high accuracy. This sequential approach correctly classified 86% of patients. Importantly, the approach was equally accurate in patients with intermediate QRS duration (130-150ms), where 93% of patients were correctly classified.

Conclusions

Combined assessment of septal LGE and septal flash by CMR as single image modality identifies CRT responders with high accuracy and predicts long-term survival. Abstract Figure.

Is left ventricular function reduced after ultra-endurance exercise?

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Norwegian Health Association

Introduction

Ultra-endurance exercise can be harmful according to previous studies, indicated by reduction in functional parameters and increase in cardiac biomarkers. Changes in load and heart rate with exercise influence left ventricle systolic function, making assessment of standard echocardiographic examination difficult.

Purpose

We investigated the effect of ultra-endurance exercise on myocardial function acutely and at restitution.

Methods

We investigated 10 participants aged 46 ±7 years, before (baseline), within 142 ± 78 minutes after finish (post run) and 5-10 days after (restitution) an ultra-endurance race (3.8 km swimming, 180 km bicycling and 42 km running with a total elevation of 5200 m). Echocardiography was performed at the three time points, including cardiac morphology and -function. Ejection fraction (EF) and stroke volume (SV) were measured by Simpson biplane. Cardiac output was calculated from SV and heart rate (HR). Cardiac power was calculated as the product of CO, mean arterial blood pressure and the conversion factor to Watt (W) 0.00222. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was calculated using speckle-tracking echocardiography, and myocardial work was calculated by non-invasive pressure-strain analysis.

Results

Acutely after exercise, myocardial function by GLS (p = 0.002), myocardial work (p &lt; 0.001), mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE, p = 0.003) and EF (p = 0.004) were substantially reduced compared to baseline, whereas cardiac power and cardiac output (CO) were maintained (see table and figure). Heart rate was moderately increased (p &lt; 0.001). End-diastolic volume (EDV) as an index of preload was numerically, but not significantly reduced. End systolic volume (ESV) was numerically increased (p = NS) even though systolic blood pressure (sBP) was reduced (p = 0.01) post race. After restitution all parameters returned to baseline levels.

Conclusions

The temporary reduced strain and EF may be a physiologic response due to the higher heart rate. However, despite reduced systolic pressure the heart did not contract to a lower end systolic volume. This suggests loss of contractile function compensated by increase in heart rate. The findings should be explored in further studies. Abstract Figure  Abstract Table

Left atrial mechanical dyssynchrony: an independent predictor of left ventricular reverse remodelling after cardiac resynchronization therapy

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Institute for Chirurgical Research - Oslo University Hospital

Introduction

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) leads to left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony. Since the left atrium (LA) and the left ventricle (LV) are anatomically connected, dyssynchronous LV contractions may be transmitted to the LA causing LA dyssynchrony and disturbed LA function.

Purpose

To investigate if LA dyssynchrony induced by LBBB predicts LV reverse remodelling after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Methods

In a prospective study, myocardial strain was measured by speckle-tracking echocardiography in 171 heart failure patients with LBBB, before and 6 months after CRT. LA dyssynchrony was measured as the time delay between onset systolic stretch of the interatrial septum and the LA lateral wall (white arrows in Figure), and LV dyssynchrony as the time from onset septal shortening to onset lateral wall shortening. Septal flash was assessed visually. Response to CRT was defined as at least 15 % reduction in LV end systolic volume at 6 months follow up.

Results

The figure shows a representative LBBB patient with LA and LV dyssynchrony which was abolished by CRT. For the whole study population, LA dyssynchrony was 104 ± 77 ms (mean ± SD) before CRT, and decreased to 43 ± 70 ms (p &lt; 0.0001) after CRT. There was a significant correlation between LA and LV dyssynchrony (r = 0.68, p &lt; 0.0001).

LA dyssynchrony correlated with LV reverse remodelling after CRT (p = 0.009), and multivariable analysis revealed that LA dyssynchrony was an independent predictor of CRT response (β=-0.046, p = 0.04) when combined with septal flash, QRS duration and QRS morphology (Table).

Conclusions

Patients with LBBB had marked LA dyssynchrony which was attributed to direct LV-LA mechanical interaction. Furthermore, LA dyssynchrony was an independent predictor of LV reverse remodelling after CRT. These findings suggest that assessment of LA dyssynchrony should be part of the echocardiographic evaluation in patients with dyssynchronous heart failure. Abstract Figure.

Multimodality imaging in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging

Nearly half of all patients with heart failure (HF) have a normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and the condition is termed heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). It is assumed that in these patients HF is due primarily to LV diastolic dysfunction. The prognosis in HFpEF is almost as severe as in HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). In contrast to HFrEF where drugs and devices are proven to reduce mortality, in HFpEF there has been limited therapy available with documented effects on prognosis. This may reflect that HFpEF encompasses a wide range of different pathological processes, which multimodality imaging is well placed to differentiate. Progress in developing therapies for HFpEF has been hampered by a lack of uniform diagnostic criteria. The present expert consensus document from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) provides recommendations regarding how to determine elevated LV filling pressure in the setting of suspected HFpEF and how to use multimodality imaging to determine specific aetiologies in patients with HFpEF.

Myocardial work still reflect function while strain simply measure deformation when afterload increases

Introduction

Global longitudinal strain is recommended by the European Society of Cardiology to detect subclinical left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, but is markedly load-dependent. Myocardial work was recently introduced as a clinical tool to study LV function by pressure-strain analysis. Since myocardial work incorporates afterload, it is assumed to be less afterload-dependent than strain, but the relationship with afterload is incompletely understood.

Hypothesis

Myocardial work is a better tool than strain, to measure myocardial function during elevated afterload.

Methods

In eleven anesthetized dogs, LV volume and longitudinal strain were measured by sonomicrometry, and pressure by micromanometry. Myocardial work was calculated by pressure-strain analysis. Additionally, stroke work was calculated as the area of the pressure-volume loop. Afterload was instantly increased by aortic constriction using a pneumatic cuff around the ascending aorta. Measurements were performed at baseline, during moderate- and marked afterload elevations.

Results

Table 1 summarizes the results. LV pressure (LVP) successively increased with moderate and marked afterload elevation, while longitudinal strain was successively reduced. Myocardial work and stroke work, on the other hand, increased with moderate afterload elevation, but was then reduced at marked afterload increase (Figure 1 and Table 1). Stroke volume and ejection fraction corresponded to strain and were reduced with afterload elevation.

Conclusions

Longitudinal strain and myocardial work have qualitatively different responses to increased afterload. While moderate changes in afterload cause reductions in strain that can be falsely interpreted as reductions in contractility, myocardial work increases as it incorporates the increased workload at moderately elevated afterload.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): The Norwegian Health Association

Left bundle branch block causes left atrial dyssynchrony: a result of atrio-ventricular mechanical interaction

Introduction

Left bundle brach block (LBBB) leads to left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony with septal flash and delayed lateral wall contractions. Since atrium and ventricle are anatomically connected, dyssynchronous LV contractions may be transmitted to the left atrium, thereby disturbing left (LA) function.

Purpose

To test the hypothesis that patients with LBBB have LA dyssynchrony induced by tethering to the dyssynchronous left ventricle.

Methods

Myocardial strain was measured by speckle-tracking echocardiography in 20 non-ischaemic heart failure patients with LBBB, before and 6 months after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and in 20 healthy controls. For the LA, dyssynchrony was measured as time delay between onset of the interatrial septum and the lateral wall, and for the LV, between onset septal flash and onset lateral wall contraction. White arrows in Figure indicate onset LA stretch.

Results

As shown in the Figure, patients with LBBB and HF had marked LA reservoir phase dyssynchrony. Before CRT time delay from onset LA septal stretch to onset lateral wall stretch was 125±71 ms (mean±SD), and decreased to 23±70 (p&lt;0.0001) with CRT. In controls there was a small delay of 34±56 ms. The LA dyssynchrony correlated with LV dyssynchrony (r=0.50, p=0.033), supporting the hypothesis that LA dyssynchrony in LBBB represents mechanical interaction due to tethering between the respective walls.

Conclusions

Patients with LBBB had marked LA reservoir phase dyssynchrony, which was abolished with CRT. The LA dyssynchrony was attributed to direct LV-LA mechanical interaction. The observed LA resynchronization by CRT represent an additional benefit of CRT in patients with heart failure.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Left atrial and ventricular dyssynchrony

Imaging of the left atrium: pathophysiology insights and clinical utility

Left atrial imaging and detailed knowledge of its pathophysiology, especially in the context of heart failure, have become an increasingly important clinical and research focus. This development has been accelerated by the growth of non-invasive imaging modalities, advanced image processing techniques, such as strain imaging, and the parallel emergence of catheter-based left atrial interventions like pulmonary vein ablation, left atrial appendage occlusion, and others. In this review, we focus on novel imaging methods for the left atrium, their pathophysiological background, and their clinical relevance for various cardiac conditions and diseases.

Left atrial strain is a predictor of left ventricular systolic and diastolic reverse remodelling in CRT candidates

AIMS

The left atrium (LA) has a pivotal role in cardiac performance and LA deformation is a well-known prognostic predictor in several clinical conditions including heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on both LA morphology and function and to assess the impact of LA reservoir strain (LARS) on left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic remodelling after CRT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-one CRT-candidates were prospectively included in the study in four tertiary centres and underwent echocardiography before CRT-implantation and at 6-month follow-up (FU). CRT-response was defined by a 15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume. LV systolic and diastolic remodelling were defined as the percent reduction in LV end-systolic and end-diastolic volume at FU. Indexed LA volume (LAVI) and LV-global longitudinal (GLS) strain were the main parameters correlated with LARS, with LV-GLS being the strongest determinant of LARS (r = -0.59, P < 0.0001). CRT induced a significant improvement in LAVI and LARS in responders (both P < 0.0001). LARS was an independent predictor of both LV systolic and diastolic remodelling at follow-up (r = -0.14, P = 0.049 and r = -0.17, P = 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

CRT induces a significant improvement in LAVI and LARS in responders. In CRT candidates, the evaluation of LARS before CRT delivery is an independent predictor of LV systolic and diastolic remodelling at FU.

How to measure left ventricular myocardial work by pressure-strain loops

Myocardial work is calculated from non-invasive left ventricular pressure and strain by speckle tracking echocardiography. Myocardial work provides diagnostic information beyond what is achieved from left ventricular ejection fraction and strain since it incorporates afterload, and provides a measure of myocardial efficiency. The method can be used to calculate global as well as segmental work. The work method was recently shown to be of clinical value in selection of patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Several other clinical applications are currently tested.

Regional myocardial work by cardiac magnetic resonance and non-invasive left ventricular pressure: a feasibility study in left bundle branch block

AIMS

Regional myocardial work may be assessed by pressure-strain analysis using a non-invasive estimate of left ventricular pressure (LVP). Strain by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) is not always accessible due to poor image quality. This study investigated the estimation of regional myocardial work from strain by feature tracking (FT) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and non-invasive LVP.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-seven heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction, left bundle branch block (LBBB), and no myocardial scar were compared to nine controls without LBBB. Circumferential strain was measured by FT-CMR in a mid-ventricular short-axis cine view, and longitudinal strain by STE. Segmental work was calculated by pressure-strain analysis. Twenty-five patients underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography. Segmental values were reported as percentages of the segment with maximum myocardial FDG uptake. In LBBB patients, net CMR-derived work was 51 ± 537 (mean ± standard deviation) in septum vs. 1978 ± 1084 mmHg·% in the left ventricular (LV) lateral wall (P < 0.001). In controls, however, there was homogeneous work distribution with similar values in septum and the LV lateral wall (non-significant). Reproducibility was good. Segmental CMR-derived work correlated with segmental STE-derived work and with segmental FDG uptake (average r = 0.71 and 0.80, respectively).

CONCLUSION

FT-CMR in combination with non-invasive LVP demonstrated markedly reduced work in septum compared to the LV lateral wall in patients with LBBB. Work distribution correlated with STE-derived work and energy demand as reflected in FDG uptake. These results suggest that FT-CMR in combination with non-invasive LVP is a relevant clinical tool to measure regional myocardial work.

Lateral Wall Dysfunction Signals Onset of Progressive Heart Failure in Left Bundle Branch Block

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate if contractile asymmetry between septum and left ventricular (LV) lateral wall drives heart failure development in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and whether the presence of lateral wall dysfunction affects potential for recovery of LV function with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

BACKGROUND

LBBB may induce or aggravate heart failure. Understanding the underlying mechanisms is important to optimize timing of CRT.

METHODS

In 76 nonischemic patients with LBBB and 11 controls, we measured strain using speckle-tracking echocardiography and regional work using pressure-strain analysis. Patients with LBBB were stratified according to LV ejection fraction (EF) ≥50% (EF_preserved), 36% to 49% (EF_mid), and ≤35% (EF_low). Sixty-four patients underwent CRT and were re-examined after 6 months.

RESULTS

Septal work was successively reduced from controls, through EF_preserved, EF_mid, and EF_low (all p < 0.005), and showed a strong correlation to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; r = 0.84; p < 0.005). In contrast, LV lateral wall work was numerically increased in EF_preserved and EF_mid versus controls, and did not significantly correlate with LVEF in these groups. In EF_low, however, LV lateral wall work was substantially reduced (p < 0.005). There was a moderate overall correlation between LV lateral wall work and LVEF (r = 0.58; p < 0.005). In CRT recipients, LVEF was normalized (≥50%) in 54% of patients with preserved LV lateral wall work, but only in 13% of patients with reduced LV lateral wall work (p < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

In early stages, LBBB-induced heart failure is associated with impaired septal function but preserved lateral wall function. The advent of LV lateral wall dysfunction may be an optimal time-point for CRT.

Prognostic value of diastolic function assessment in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Objective

The best modality to assess diastolic function in CRT-candidates is an object of debate and the relationship between diastolic function, CRT-response and survival are not

clearly understood.

Purpose of the study: to assess diastolic patterns in patients undergoing CRT according to the 2016 recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and to evaluate the prognostic value of diastolic dysfunction (DD) in CRT candidates.

Methods

193 patients (age: 67 ± 11 years, QRS width: 167 ± 21 ms) were included in this multicentre prospective study. Patients were stratified according to DD grades (grade I

to III). CRT-response was defined as a reduction of left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume &gt;15% at 6-month follow-up (FU). The primary endpoint was defined as a

composite of heart transplantation, LV assisted device implantation or all-cause death during FU.

Results

During FU, 132 (68%) patients were CRT-responders. CRT delivery was associated with diastolic function degradation in non-responders. Grade I DD was able to predict

CRT-response with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 70%, 65%, and 63%, respectively. After a median period of 35 months, the primary endpoint occurred in 29

(15%) patients. Grade I DD was associated with a better outcome [HR 0.26 95% CI: (0.10-0.66)], independently from ischemic cardiomyopathy, LV dyssynchrony and CRT-response (Table 1). Non-responders with grade II or grade III DD had the worse prognosis (HR 4.36, 95%CI: 2.10-9.06) Figure 1.

Conclusions

Grade I DD is associated with LV remodelling after CRT and is an independent predictor of prognosis in CRT candidates.

Abstract Figure.

Evaluation of left ventricular filling pressure by echocardiography: incremental diagnostic information from left atrial strain

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority

Background

Elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressure is an important diagnostic feature of heart failure.

Objectives

To investigate determinants of left atrial (LA) reservoir and pump strain and if these parameters may serve as markers of LV filling pressure.

Methods

In a multicenter study of 322 patients with cardiovascular disease of different etiologies, LA strain by speckle tracking echocardiography was compared to conventional echocardiographic markers using invasive pressure as reference.

Results

Left ventricular filling pressure correlated well with LA reservoir and pump strain (r-values

‑0.52 and ‑0.57, respectively) (Figure). However, LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) was the strongest determinant of LA reservoir strain (r = 0.64), and correlated well with LA pump strain (r = 0.51).  For both LA strains, association with filling pressure was strongest in patients with reduced LV ejection fraction. In patients with normal GLS (≥18%), atrial strains provided no information regarding filling pressure (Figure). Reservoir strain &lt;18% and pump strain &lt;8% predicted elevated LV filling pressure better (p &lt; 0.05) than the conventional indices LA volume, ratio of mitral early filling velocity/annular velocity and tricuspid regurgitation velocity. Accuracy to classify filling pressure as normal or elevated was 75% for both LA strains . When any one of the conventional indices were missing, and were replaced by LA strains, the combination of indices had accuracy 82% to correctly classify filling pressure.

Conclusions

Left atrial reservoir and pump strain may serve as clinical markers of LV filling pressure, but will be useful predominantly in patients with reduced systolic function.  Due to limited diagnostic accuracy, LA strain should be used in combination with other indices.

Abstract Figure

Importance of systematic right ventricular assessment in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates: a machine-learning approach

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Despite having all a systolic heart failure and broad QRS, patients proposed for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are highly heterogeneous and it remains extremely complicated to predict the impact of the device on left ventricular (LV) function and outcomes.

Objectives

We sought to evaluate the relative impact of clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic data on the left ventricular (LV) remodeling and prognosis of CRT-candidates by the application of machine learning (ML) approaches.

Methods

193 patients with systolic heart failure undergoing CRT according to current recommendations were prospectively included in this multicentre study. We used a combination of the Boruta algorithm and random forest methods to identify features predicting both CRT volumetric response and prognosis (Figure 1). The model performance was tested by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). We also applied the K-medoid method to identify clusters of phenotypically-similar patients.

Results

From 28 clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic-derived variables, 16 features were predictive of CRT-response; 11 features were predictive of prognosis.

Among the predictors of CRT-response, 7 variables (44%) pertained to right ventricular (RV) size or function. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion was the main feature associated with prognosis. The selected features were associated with a very good prediction of both CRT response (AUC 0.81, 95% CI: 0.74-0.87) and outcomes (AUC 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75-0.93) (Figure 1, Supervised Machine Learning Panel). An unsupervised ML approach allowed the identifications of two phenogroups of patients who differed significantly in clinical and parameters, biventricular size and RV function. The two phenogroups had significant different prognosis (HR 4.70, 95% CI: 2.1-10.0, p &lt; 0.0001; log –rank p &lt; 0.0001; Figure 1, Unsupervised Machine Learning Panel).

Conclusions

Machine learning can reliably identify clinical and echocardiographic features associated with CRT-response and prognosis. The evaluation of both RV-size and function parameters has pivotal importance for the risk stratification of CRT-candidates and should be systematically assessed in patients undergoing CRT.

Abstract Figure 1