1
|
du Cros P, Greig J, Alffenaar JWC, Cross GB, Cousins C, Berry C, Khan U, Phillips PPJ, Velásquez GE, Furin J, Spigelman M, Denholm JT, Thi SS, Tiberi S, Huang GKL, Marks GB, Turkova A, Guglielmetti L, Chew KL, Nguyen HT, Ong CWM, Brigden G, Singh KP, Motta I, Lange C, Seddon JA, Nyang'wa BT, Maug AKJ, Gler MT, Dooley KE, Quelapio M, Tsogt B, Menzies D, Cox V, Upton CM, Skrahina A, McKenna L, Horsburgh CR, Dheda K, Marais BJ. Standards for clinical trials for treating TB. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2023; 27:885-898. [PMID: 38042969 PMCID: PMC10719894 DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.23.0341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The value, speed of completion and robustness of the evidence generated by TB treatment trials could be improved by implementing standards for best practice.METHODS: A global panel of experts participated in a Delphi process, using a 7-point Likert scale to score and revise draft standards until consensus was reached.RESULTS: Eleven standards were defined: Standard 1, high quality data on TB regimens are essential to inform clinical and programmatic management; Standard 2, the research questions addressed by TB trials should be relevant to affected communities, who should be included in all trial stages; Standard 3, trials should make every effort to be as inclusive as possible; Standard 4, the most efficient trial designs should be considered to improve the evidence base as quickly and cost effectively as possible, without compromising quality; Standard 5, trial governance should be in line with accepted good clinical practice; Standard 6, trials should investigate and report strategies that promote optimal engagement in care; Standard 7, where possible, TB trials should include pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic components; Standard 8, outcomes should include frequency of disease recurrence and post-treatment sequelae; Standard 9, TB trials should aim to harmonise key outcomes and data structures across studies; Standard 10, TB trials should include biobanking; Standard 11, treatment trials should invest in capacity strengthening of local trial and TB programme staff.CONCLUSION: These standards should improve the efficiency and effectiveness of evidence generation, as well as the translation of research into policy and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P du Cros
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Monash Infectious Diseases, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - J Greig
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Manson Unit, London, UK
| | - J-W C Alffenaar
- Sydney Infectious Diseases Institute (Sydney ID), and, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW
| | - G B Cross
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - C Cousins
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - C Berry
- Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Manson Unit, London, UK
| | - U Khan
- Interactive Research and Development Global, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - P P J Phillips
- UCSF Center for Tuberculosis, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, and
| | - G E Velásquez
- UCSF Center for Tuberculosis, Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases, and Global Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - J Furin
- Harvard Medical School, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - M Spigelman
- Global Alliance for TB Drug Development, New York, NY, USA
| | - J T Denholm
- Victorian Tuberculosis Program, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, VIC, Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - S S Thi
- Eswatini National TB Control Program, Mbabane, Kingdom of Eswatini
| | - S Tiberi
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK
| | - G K L Huang
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Northern Health Infectious Diseases, Northern Health, Melbourne, VIC
| | - G B Marks
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - A Turkova
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK
| | - L Guglielmetti
- Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Paris, Sorbonne Université, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Unité 1135, Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, Paris, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Centre National de Référence des Mycobactéries et de la Résistance des Mycobactéries, Paris, France
| | - K L Chew
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - H T Nguyen
- Research Department, Friends for International TB Relief, Ha Noi, Vietnam
| | - C W M Ong
- Infectious Diseases Translational Research Programme, Department of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore City, Institute of Healthcare Innovation & Technology, National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - G Brigden
- The Global Fund, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - K P Singh
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, Victorian Infectious Disease Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - C Lange
- Division of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Research Center Borstel, Borstel, German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), TTU-TB, Borstel, Respiratory Medicine & International Health, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J A Seddon
- Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK, Desmond Tutu TB Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa
| | - B-T Nyang'wa
- Public Health Department, Operational Center Amsterdam (OCA), MSF, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A K J Maug
- Damien Foundation Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - M T Gler
- De La Salle Medical and Health Sciences Institute, Dasmariñas, the Philippines
| | - K E Dooley
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - M Quelapio
- Tropical Disease Foundation, Makati City, Manila, the Philippines, KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - B Tsogt
- Mongolian Anti-TB Coalition, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
| | - D Menzies
- Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Montreal Chest Institute & McGill International TB Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - V Cox
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, School of Public Health and Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town
| | - C M Upton
- TASK Applied Science, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - A Skrahina
- The Republican Scientific and Practical Center for Pulmonology and TB, Minsk, Belarus
| | - L McKenna
- Treatment Action Group, New York, NY
| | - C R Horsburgh
- Departments of Global Health, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Medicine, Schools of Public Health and Medicine, Boston University, Boston MA, USA
| | - K Dheda
- Centre for Lung Infection and Immunity, Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine and UCT Lung Institute & South African MRC/UCT Centre for the Study of Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Department of Immunology and Infection, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - B J Marais
- Sydney Infectious Diseases Institute (Sydney ID), and, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, WHO Collaborating Centre in Tuberculosis, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chang V, Phillips PPJ, Imperial MZ, Nahid P, Savic RM. A comparison of clinical development pathways to advance tuberculosis regimen development. BMC Infect Dis 2022; 22:920. [PMID: 36494644 PMCID: PMC9733404 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07846-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current tuberculosis (TB) regimen development pathways are slow and in urgent need of innovation. We investigated novel phase IIc and seamless phase II/III trials utilizing multi-arm multi-stage and Bayesian response adaptive randomization trial designs to select promising combination regimens in a platform adaptive trial. METHODS Clinical trial simulation tools were built using predictive and validated parametric survival models of time to culture conversion (intermediate endpoint) and time to TB-related unfavorable outcome (final endpoint). This integrative clinical trial simulation tool was used to explore and optimize design parameters for aforementioned trial designs. RESULTS Both multi-arm multi-stage and Bayesian response adaptive randomization designs were able to reliably graduate desirable regimens in ≥ 95% of trial simulations and reliably stop suboptimal regimens in ≥ 90% of trial simulations. Overall, adaptive phase IIc designs reduced patient enrollment by 17% and 25% with multi-arm multi-stage and Bayesian response adaptive randomization designs respectively compared to the conventional sequential approach, while seamless designs reduced study duration by 2.6 and 3.5 years respectively (typically ≥ 8.5 years for standard sequential approach). CONCLUSIONS In this study, we demonstrate that adaptive trial designs are suitable for TB regimen development, and we provide plausible design parameters for a platform adaptive trial. Ultimately trial design and specification of design parameters will depend on clinical trial objectives. To support decision-making for clinical trial designs in contemporary TB regimen development, we provide a flexible clinical trial simulation tool that can be used to explore and optimize design features and parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V. Chang
- grid.266102.10000 0001 2297 6811Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA ,grid.266102.10000 0001 2297 6811UCSF Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - P. P. J. Phillips
- grid.266102.10000 0001 2297 6811UCSF Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - M. Z. Imperial
- grid.266102.10000 0001 2297 6811Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA ,grid.266102.10000 0001 2297 6811UCSF Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - P. Nahid
- grid.266102.10000 0001 2297 6811UCSF Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - R. M. Savic
- grid.266102.10000 0001 2297 6811Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA ,grid.266102.10000 0001 2297 6811UCSF Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schwalb A, Cachay R, Wright A, Phillips PPJ, Kaur P, Diacon AH, Ugarte-Gil C, Mitnick CD, Sterling TR, Gotuzzo E, Horsburgh CR. Factors associated with screening failure and study withdrawal in multidrug-resistant TB. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2022; 26:820-825. [PMID: 35996282 DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.21.0729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
SETTING: Multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) clinical trial in Lima, Peru and Cape Town, South Africa.OBJECTIVE: To identify baseline factors associated with screening failure and study withdrawal in an MDR-TB clinical trial.DESIGN: We screened patients for a randomized, blinded, Phase II trial which assessed culture conversion over the first 6 months of treatment with varying doses of levofloxacin plus an optimized background regimen (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01918397). We identified factors for screening failure and study withdrawal using Poisson regression to calculate prevalence ratios and Cox proportional hazard regression to calculate hazard ratios. We adjusted for factors with P < 0.2.RESULTS: Of the 255 patients screened, 144 (56.5%) failed screening. The most common reason for screening failure was an unsuitable resistance profile on sputum-based molecular susceptibility testing (n = 105, 72.9%). No significant baseline predictors of screening failure were identified in the multivariable model. Of the 111 who were enrolled, 33 (30%) failed to complete treatment, mostly for non-adherence and consent withdrawal. No baseline factors predicted study withdrawal in the multivariable model.CONCLUSION: No baseline factors were independently associated with either screening failure or study withdrawal in this secondary analysis of a MDR-TB clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Schwalb
- Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - R Cachay
- Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - A Wright
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt Tuberculosis Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - P P J Phillips
- University of California San Francisco Center for Tuberculosis, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - P Kaur
- Boston University, Departments of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Global Health and Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A H Diacon
- TASK Applied Science and Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - C Ugarte-Gil
- Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - C D Mitnick
- School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - T R Sterling
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt Tuberculosis Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - E Gotuzzo
- Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - C R Horsburgh
- Boston University, Departments of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Global Health and Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guglielmetti L, Ardizzoni E, Atger M, Baudin E, Berikova E, Bonnet M, Chang E, Cloez S, Coit JM, Cox V, de Jong BC, Delifer C, Do JM, Tozzi DDS, Ducher V, Ferlazzo G, Gouillou M, Khan A, Khan U, Lachenal N, LaHood AN, Lecca L, Mazmanian M, McIlleron H, Moschioni M, O’Brien K, Okunbor O, Oyewusi L, Panda S, Patil SB, Phillips PPJ, Pichon L, Rupasinghe P, Rich ML, Saluhuddin N, Seung KJ, Tamirat M, Trippa L, Cellamare M, Velásquez GE, Wasserman S, Zimetbaum PJ, Varaine F, Mitnick CD. Evaluating newly approved drugs for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (endTB): study protocol for an adaptive, multi-country randomized controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22:651. [PMID: 34563240 PMCID: PMC8465691 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05491-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of multidrug- and rifampin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) is expensive, labour-intensive, and associated with substantial adverse events and poor outcomes. While most MDR/RR-TB patients do not receive treatment, many who do are treated for 18 months or more. A shorter all-oral regimen is currently recommended for only a sub-set of MDR/RR-TB. Its use is only conditionally recommended because of very low-quality evidence underpinning the recommendation. Novel combinations of newer and repurposed drugs bring hope in the fight against MDR/RR-TB, but their use has not been optimized in all-oral, shorter regimens. This has greatly limited their impact on the burden of disease. There is, therefore, dire need for high-quality evidence on the performance of new, shortened, injectable-sparing regimens for MDR-TB which can be adapted to individual patients and different settings. METHODS endTB is a phase III, pragmatic, multi-country, adaptive, randomized, controlled, parallel, open-label clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of shorter treatment regimens containing new drugs for patients with fluoroquinolone-susceptible, rifampin-resistant tuberculosis. Study participants are randomized to either the control arm, based on the current standard of care for MDR/RR-TB, or to one of five 39-week multi-drug regimens containing newly approved and repurposed drugs. Study participation in all arms lasts at least 73 and up to 104 weeks post-randomization. Randomization is response-adapted using interim Bayesian analysis of efficacy endpoints. The primary objective is to assess whether the efficacy of experimental regimens at 73 weeks is non-inferior to that of the control. A sample size of 750 patients across 6 arms affords at least 80% power to detect the non-inferiority of at least 1 (and up to 3) experimental regimens, with a one-sided alpha of 0.025 and a non-inferiority margin of 12%, against the control in both modified intention-to-treat and per protocol populations. DISCUSSION The lack of a safe and effective regimen that can be used in all patients is a major obstacle to delivering appropriate treatment to all patients with active MDR/RR-TB. Identifying multiple shorter, safe, and effective regimens has the potential to greatly reduce the burden of this deadly disease worldwide. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02754765. Registered on 28 April 2016; the record was last updated for study protocol version 3.3, on 27 August 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Guglielmetti
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, U1135, Centre d’Immunologie Et Des Maladies Infectieuses, Paris, France
- Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Centre National De Référence Des Mycobactéries Et De La Résistance Des Mycobactéries Aux Antituberculeux, Paris, France
| | - E. Ardizzoni
- Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - M. Atger
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Paris, France
| | | | - E. Berikova
- Partners In Health, Astana, Kazakhstan
- National Scientific Center of Phthisiopulmonology, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - M. Bonnet
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Paris, France
- Institut de Recherche pour le Développement/INSERM U1175/UMI233/ Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - E. Chang
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Toronto, Ontario Canada
| | - S. Cloez
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Paris, France
| | - J. M. Coit
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - V. Cox
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, School of Public Health and Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | | | - J. M. Do
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | | | - V. Ducher
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Paris, France
| | - G. Ferlazzo
- Southern Africa Medical Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - A. Khan
- Interactive Research and Development, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - U. Khan
- Interactive Research and Development, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - A. N. LaHood
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - L. Lecca
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- Socios En Salud-Sucursal Peru, Lima, Peru
| | - M. Mazmanian
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Paris, France
- Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Unité de Recherche Clinique, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - H. McIlleron
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- Wellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | | | - O. Okunbor
- Social & Scientific Systems-DLH, Silver Spring, MD USA
| | | | - S. Panda
- Epidemiology and Communicable Diseases Division, Indian Council of Medical Research, Pune, India
- Indian Council of Medical Research – National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, India
| | - S. B. Patil
- Indian Council of Medical Research – National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, India
| | - P. P. J. Phillips
- University of San Francisco Center for Tuberculosis, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - L. Pichon
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Paris, France
| | | | - M. L. Rich
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- Partners In Health, Boston, MA USA
- Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - N. Saluhuddin
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Indus Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - K. J. Seung
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- Partners In Health, Boston, MA USA
- Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | | | - L. Trippa
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA
| | | | - G. E. Velásquez
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - S. Wasserman
- Wellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- Division of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine, Department of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - P. J. Zimetbaum
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA USA
| | | | - C. D. Mitnick
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- Partners In Health, Boston, MA USA
- Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hills NK, Lyimo J, Nahid P, Savic RM, Lienhardt C, Phillips PPJ. A systematic review of endpoint definitions in late phase pulmonary tuberculosis therapeutic trials. Trials 2021; 22:515. [PMID: 34344435 PMCID: PMC8329622 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05388-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Safe, more efficacious treatments are needed to address the considerable morbidity and mortality associated with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). However, the current practice in TB therapeutics trials is to use composite binary outcomes, which in the absence of standardization may inflate false positive and negative errors in evaluating regimens. The lack of standardization of outcomes is a barrier to the identification of highly efficacious regimens and the introduction of innovative methodologies METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of trials designed to advance new pulmonary TB drugs or regimens for regulatory approval and inform practice guidelines. Trials were primarily identified from the WHO International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP). Only trials that collected post-treatment follow-up data and enrolled at least 100 patients were included. Protocols and Statistical Analysis Plans (SAP) for eligible trials from 1995 to the present were obtained from trial investigators. Details of outcome data, both explicit and implied, were abstracted and organized into three broad categories: favorable, unfavorable, and not assessable. Within these categories, individual trial definitions were recorded and collated, and areas of broad consensus and disagreement were identified and described. RESULTS From 2205 trials in any way related to TB, 51 were selected for protocol and SAP review, from which 31 were both eligible and had accessible documentation. Within the three designated categories, we found broad consensus in the definitions of favorable and unfavorable outcomes, although specific details were not always provided, and when explicitly addressed, were heterogeneous. Favorable outcomes were handled the most consistently but were widely variable with respect to specification. In some cases, the same events were defined differently by different protocols, particularly in distinguishing unfavorable from not assessable events. Death was often interpreted as conditional on cause. Patients who did not complete the study because of withdrawal or loss to follow-up presented a particular challenge to consistent interpretation and analytic treatment of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In a review of 31 clinical trials, we found that outcome definitions were heterogeneous, highlighting the need to establish clearer specification and a move towards universal standardization of outcomes across pulmonary TB trials. The ICH E9 (R1) addendum provides guidelines for undertaking and achieving this goal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42020197993 . Registration 11 August 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N K Hills
- UCSF Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - J Lyimo
- MDR-TB Coordinator-National TB and Leprosy Program, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania
| | - P Nahid
- UCSF Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - R M Savic
- UCSF Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - C Lienhardt
- Unité Mixte Internationale TransVIHMI (UMI 233 IRD - U1175 INSERM - Université de Montpellier), Montpellier, France
| | - P P J Phillips
- UCSF Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Phillips PPJ, Van Deun A, Ahmed S, Goodall RL, Meredith SK, Conradie F, Chiang CY, Rusen ID, Nunn AJ. Investigation of the efficacy of the short regimen for rifampicin-resistant TB from the STREAM trial. BMC Med 2020; 18:314. [PMID: 33143704 PMCID: PMC7640464 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01770-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The STREAM trial demonstrated that a 9-11-month "short" regimen had non-inferior efficacy and comparable safety to a 20+ month "long" regimen for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis. Imbalance in the components of the composite primary outcome merited further investigation. METHODS Firstly, the STREAM primary outcomes were mapped to alternatives in current use, including WHO programmatic outcome definitions and other recently proposed modifications for programmatic or research purposes. Secondly, the outcomes were re-classified according to the likelihood that it was a Failure or Relapse (FoR) event on a 5-point Likert scale: Definite, Probable, Possible, Unlikely, and Highly Unlikely. Sensitivity analyses were employed to explore the impact of informative censoring. The protocol-defined modified intention-to-treat (MITT) analysis population was used for all analyses. RESULTS Cure on the short regimen ranged from 75.1 to 84.2% across five alternative outcomes. However, between-regimens results did not exceed 1.3% in favor of the long regimen (95% CI upper bound 10.1%), similar to the primary efficacy results from the trial. Considering only Definite or Probable FoR events, there was weak evidence of a higher risk of FoR in the short regimen, HR 2.19 (95%CI 0.90, 5.35), p = 0.076; considering only Definite FoR events, the evidence was stronger, HR 3.53 (95%CI 1.05, 11.87), p = 0.030. Cumulative number of grade 3-4 AEs was the strongest predictor of censoring. Considering a larger effect of informative censoring attenuated treatment differences, although 95% CI were very wide. CONCLUSION Five alternative outcome definitions gave similar overall results. The risk of failure or relapse (FoR) may be higher in the short regimen than in the long regimen, highlighting the importance of how loss to follow-up and other censoring is accounted for in analyses. The outcome of time to FoR should be considered as a primary outcome for future drug-sensitive and drug-resistant TB treatment trials, provided sensitivity analyses exploring the impact of departures from independent censoring are also included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P P J Phillips
- UCSF Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
| | | | - S Ahmed
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | | | | | - F Conradie
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - C-Y Chiang
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wanfang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (the Union), Paris, France
| | - I D Rusen
- Research Division, Vital Strategies, New York, USA
| | - A J Nunn
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bogdanova EN, Mariandyshev AO, Balantcev GA, Eliseev PI, Nikishova EI, Gaida AI, Enarson D, Detjen A, Dacombe R, Phillips PPJ, Squire SB, Gospodarevskaya E. Cost minimization analysis of line probe assay for detection of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Arkhangelsk region of Russian Federation. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0211203. [PMID: 30695043 PMCID: PMC6350971 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2017] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The development of new diagnostic tools allows for faster detection of both tuberculosis (TB) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB and should lead to reduced transmission by earlier initiation of anti TB therapy. The research conducted in the Arkhangelsk region of the Russian Federation in 2012–14 included economic evaluation of Line Probe Assay (LPA) implementation in MDR-TB diagnostics compared to existing culture-based diagnostics of Löwenstein Jensen (LJ) and BacTAlert. Clinical superiority of LPA was demonstrated and results were reported elsewhere. Study aim The PROVE-IT Russia study aimed to report the outcomes of the cost minimization analysis. Methods Costs of LPA-based diagnostic algorithm (smear positive (SSm+) and for smear negative (SSm-) culture confirmed TB patients by Bactec MGIT or LJ were compared with conventional culture-based algorithm (LJ–for SSm- and SSm+ patients and BacTAlert–for SSm+ patients). Cost minimization analysis was conducted from the healthcare system, patient and societal perspectives and included the direct and indirect costs to the healthcare system (microscopy and drug susceptibility test (DST), hospitalization, medications obtained from electronic medical records) and non-hospital direct costs (patient’s travel cost, additional expenses associated with hospitalization, supplementary medicine and food) collected at the baseline and two subsequent interviews using the WHO-approved questionnaire. Results Over the period of treatment the LPA-based diagnostic corresponded to lesser direct and indirect costs comparing to the alternative algorithms. For SSm+ LPA-based diagnostics resulted in the costs 4.5 times less (808.21 US$) than LJ (3593.81 US$) and 2.5 times less than BacTAlert liquid culture (2009.61 US$). For SSm- LPA in combination with Bactec MGIT (1480.75 US$) vs LJ (1785.83 US$) showed the highest cost minimization compared to LJ (2566.09 US$). One-way sensitivity analyses of the key parameters and threshold analyses were conducted and demonstrated that the results were robust to variations in the cost of hospitalization, medications and length of stay. Conclusion From the perspective of Russian Federation healthcare system, TB diagnostic algorithms incorporating LPA method proved to be both more clinically effective and less expensive due to reduction in the number of hospital days to the correct MDR-TB diagnosis and treatment initiation. LPA diagnostics comparing conventional culture diagnostic algorithm MDR-TB was a cost minimizing strategy for both patients and healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. N. Bogdanova
- Northern Arctic Federal University, Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation
- * E-mail:
| | | | - G. A. Balantcev
- Northern Arctic Federal University, Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation
| | - P. I. Eliseev
- Northern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation
| | - E. I. Nikishova
- Arkhangelsk Clinical Antituberculosis Dispensary, Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation
| | - A. I. Gaida
- Arkhangelsk Clinical Antituberculosis Dispensary, Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation
| | - D. Enarson
- The International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France
| | - A. Detjen
- The International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France
| | - R. Dacombe
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | | | - S. B. Squire
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - E. Gospodarevskaya
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Murthy SE, Chatterjee F, Crook A, Dawson R, Mendel C, Murphy ME, Murray SR, Nunn AJ, Phillips PPJ, Singh KP, McHugh TD, Gillespie SH. Pretreatment chest x-ray severity and its relation to bacterial burden in smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis. BMC Med 2018; 16:73. [PMID: 29779492 PMCID: PMC5961483 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1053-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Accepted: 04/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chest radiographs are used for diagnosis and severity assessment in tuberculosis (TB). The extent of disease as determined by smear grade and cavitation as a binary measure can predict 2-month smear results, but little has been done to determine whether radiological severity reflects the bacterial burden at diagnosis. METHODS Pre-treatment chest x-rays from 1837 participants with smear-positive pulmonary TB enrolled into the REMoxTB trial (Gillespie et al., N Engl J Med 371:1577-87, 2014) were retrospectively reviewed. Two clinicians blinded to clinical details using the Ralph scoring system performed separate readings. An independent reader reviewed discrepant results for quality assessment and cavity presence. Cavitation presence was plotted against time to positivity (TTP) of sputum liquid cultures (MGIT 960). The Wilcoxon rank sum test was performed to calculate the difference in average TTP for these groups. The average lung field affected was compared to log 10 TTP by linear regression. Baseline markers of disease severity and patient characteristics were added in univariable regression analysis against radiological severity and a multivariable regression model was created to explore their relationship. RESULTS For 1354 participants, the median TTP was 117 h (4.88 days), being 26 h longer (95% CI 16-30, p < 0.001) in patients without cavitation compared to those with cavitation. The median percentage of lung-field affected was 18.1% (IQR 11.3-28.8%). For every 10-fold increase in TTP, the area of lung field affected decreased by 11.4%. Multivariable models showed that serum albumin decreased significantly as the percentage of lung field area increased in both those with and without cavitation. In addition, BMI and logged TTP had a small but significant effect in those with cavitation and the number of severe TB symptoms in the non-cavitation group also had a small effect, whilst other factors found to be significant on univariable analysis lost this effect in the model. CONCLUSIONS The radiological severity of disease on chest x-ray prior to treatment in smear positive pulmonary TB patients is weakly associated with the bacterial burden. When compared against other variables at diagnosis, this effect is lost in those without cavitation. Radiological severity does reflect the overall disease severity in smear positive pulmonary TB, but we suggest that clinicians should be cautious in over-interpreting the significance of radiological disease extent at diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S E Murthy
- UCL Centre for Clinical Microbiology, Department of Infection, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
| | - F Chatterjee
- Department of Radiology, Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London, E1 1BB, UK
| | - A Crook
- Medical Research Council UK Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Aviation House, 125 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6NH, UK
| | - R Dawson
- University of Cape Town Lung Institute, George Street, Mowbray, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - C Mendel
- Global Alliance for Tuberculosis Drug Development, New York, NY, 10005, USA
| | - M E Murphy
- UCL Centre for Clinical Microbiology, Department of Infection, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - S R Murray
- Global Alliance for Tuberculosis Drug Development, New York, NY, 10005, USA
| | - A J Nunn
- Medical Research Council UK Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Aviation House, 125 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6NH, UK
| | - P P J Phillips
- Medical Research Council UK Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Aviation House, 125 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6NH, UK
| | - Kasha P Singh
- UCL Centre for Clinical Microbiology, Department of Infection, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - T D McHugh
- UCL Centre for Clinical Microbiology, Department of Infection, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - S H Gillespie
- Medical and Biological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, KY16 9TF, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ramalho DMP, Miranda PFC, Andrade MK, Brígido T, Dalcolmo MP, Mesquita E, Dias CF, Gambirasio AN, Ueleres Braga J, Detjen A, Phillips PPJ, Langley I, Fujiwara PI, Squire SB, Oliveira MM, Kritski AL. Outcomes from patients with presumed drug resistant tuberculosis in five reference centers in Brazil. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17:571. [PMID: 28810911 PMCID: PMC5558720 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2669-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2016] [Accepted: 08/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The implementation of rapid drug susceptibility testing (DST) is a current global priority for TB control. However, data are scarce on patient-relevant outcomes for presumptive diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis (pDR-TB) evaluated under field conditions in high burden countries. Methods Observational study of pDR-TB patients referred by primary and secondary health units. TB reference centers addressing DR-TB in five cities in Brazil. Patients age 18 years and older were eligible if pDR-TB, culture positive results for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and, if no prior DST results from another laboratory were used by a physician to start anti-TB treatment. The outcome measures were median time from triage to initiating appropriate anti-TB treatment, empirical treatment and, the treatment outcomes. Results Between February,16th, 2011 and February, 15th, 2012, among 175 pDR TB cases, 110 (63.0%) confirmed TB cases with DST results were enrolled. Among study participants, 72 (65.5%) were male and 62 (56.4%) aged 26 to 45 years. At triage, empirical treatment was given to 106 (96.0%) subjects. Among those, 85 were treated with first line drugs and 21 with second line. Median time for DST results was 69.5 [interquartile - IQR: 35.7–111.0] days and, for initiating appropriate anti-TB treatment, the median time was 1.0 (IQR: 0–41.2) days. Among 95 patients that were followed-up during the first 6 month period, 24 (25.3%; IC: 17.5%–34.9%) changed or initiated the treatment after DST results: 16/29 MDRTB, 5/21 DR-TB and 3/45 DS-TB cases. Comparing the treatment outcome to DS-TB cases, MDRTB had higher proportions changing or initiating treatment after DST results (p = 0.01) and favorable outcomes (p = 0.07). Conclusions This study shows a high rate of empirical treatment and long delay for DST results. Strategies to speed up the detection and early treatment of drug resistant TB should be prioritized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M P Ramalho
- Tuberculosis Academic Program, Medical School and Hospital Complex HUCFF-IDT, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - P F C Miranda
- Tuberculosis Academic Program, Medical School and Hospital Complex HUCFF-IDT, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - M K Andrade
- Tuberculosis Academic Program, Medical School and Hospital Complex HUCFF-IDT, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Helio Fraga Reference Center - ENSP -Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - T Brígido
- Messejana Hospital -State Secretary of Health, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
| | - M P Dalcolmo
- Helio Fraga Reference Center - ENSP -Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - E Mesquita
- Ary Parreiras Institute - State Secretary of Health, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - C F Dias
- Sanatório Partenon Hospital - State Secretary of Health, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - A N Gambirasio
- Clemente Ferreira Institute - State Secretary of Health, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - J Ueleres Braga
- Helio Fraga Reference Center - ENSP -Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - A Detjen
- International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France
| | | | - I Langley
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - P I Fujiwara
- International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France
| | - S B Squire
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - M M Oliveira
- Tuberculosis Academic Program, Medical School and Hospital Complex HUCFF-IDT, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - A L Kritski
- Tuberculosis Academic Program, Medical School and Hospital Complex HUCFF-IDT, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Affiliation(s)
- P. P. J. Phillips
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Drug development for tuberculosis (TB) faces numerous practical obstacles, including the need for combination treatment with at least three drugs, reliance on possibly unrepresentative animal models which may not reproduce key features of human disease and the lack of a well-validated surrogate endpoint for stable cure. Pivotal Phase III trials are large, lengthy and expensive, and the funding and capacity to conduct them are limited worldwide. More rational methods for the selection of priority regimens for Phase III are urgently needed to avoid costly late-stage failures. We examine the suitability of adaptive clinical trial designs for drug development in TB, focusing on designs for Phase IIB and III trials, where we believe the biggest gains in efficiency can be made. Key areas that may be addressed by such designs are improvements in the selection of doses and combinations of drugs in early clinical development and in maximising the power of confirmatory trials in multidrug-resistant TB, where patient numbers and complexity pose practical limitations. We encourage trialists and regulators in this area to consider the advantages that may be offered by these designs and their potential to more effectively and rapidly identify better treatment regimens for TB patients worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G R Davies
- Institutes of Infection and Global Health and Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - P P J Phillips
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK
| | - T Jaki
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Phillips PPJ, Lipman MC. Safe and effective treatment for patients with isoniazid drug resistance. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2015; 19:494-5. [PMID: 25860010 DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.14.0861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- P P J Phillips
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College, London, UK.
| | - M C Lipman
- Department of HIV Medicine, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Phillips PPJ, Nunn AJ, Paton NI. Is a 4-month regimen adequate to cure patients with non-cavitary tuberculosis and negative cultures at 2 months? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2013; 17:807-9. [PMID: 23676166 DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.12.0725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
A recent trial evaluating a 4-month regimen of standard drugs in adults with non-cavitary tuberculosis (TB) and negative cultures at 2 months failed to demonstrate equivalence compared to the same regimen given for 6 months. To contribute further evidence, data from two trials conducted by the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) comparing 4 and 6 month regimens were re-analysed. The results from the BMRC trials in patients with non-cavitary TB and negative cultures at 2 months were consistent with those from the recent trial. However, given that there was no acquired drug resistance, the estimated 6.6% relapse rate (95%CI 4.3-10.1) across all three trials might be considered acceptable for a 4-month regimen in patients with non-cavitary pulmonary TB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P P J Phillips
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Phillips PPJ, Bratton DJ, Nunn AJ, Hoelscher M. Reply to Dodd and Proschan. J Infect Dis 2013; 207:544-5. [DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jis705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
15
|
Perrin FMR, Woodward N, Phillips PPJ, McHugh TD, Nunn AJ, Lipman MCI, Gillespie SH. Radiological cavitation, sputum mycobacterial load and treatment response in pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2010; 14:1596-1602. [PMID: 21144246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023] Open
Abstract
SETTING Royal Free Hospital, London. OBJECTIVE To investigate the relationship between sputum mycobacterial load, assessed by time to positivity (TTP) in liquid culture, radiological cavitation and change in sputum bacterial load in response to anti-tuberculosis treatment. DESIGN The study was conducted on 95 patients treated for sputum culture-positive pulmonary tuberculosis (TB), with pre-treatment TTP and baseline chest X-ray (CXR). Of these, 31 had chest computed tomography scans assessed for number and volume of cavities. The microbiological treatment response was measured in 56 patients with serial TTP, and related to baseline radiological cavitation. RESULTS Cavitation was present in 48% of patients, and was associated with a shorter TTP at baseline (P < 0.001). Patients with more cavities and greater total cavitary volume had a shorter TTP (P < 0.001 for both). No difference was demonstrated in the rate of change in TTP on treatment (P = 0.36) between patients with and without cavities. CONCLUSION This study confirms that cavitation is associated with higher baseline sputum mycobacterial load. The rate of decline in bacterial load in response to treatment is similar in patients with and without radiologically demonstrable cavities, suggesting that response to, and hence duration of, effective treatment may be predicted by the initial number of organisms present in the sputum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F M R Perrin
- Department of Infection, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nunn AJ, Phillips PPJ, Mitchison DA. Timing of relapse in short-course chemotherapy trials for tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2010; 14:241-242. [PMID: 20074418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
We have reviewed the results from 15 tuberculosis treatment trials initiated by the British Medical Research Council between 1970 and 1983 in Africa and East Asia. Of 574 relapses, 447 (78%) occurred within 6 months of stopping treatment and 525 (91%) within 12 months. We suggest that investigators should consider terminating follow-up after the last enrolled patient completes 6 months following treatment, while continuing to follow patients enrolled earlier until that time. Compared to following all patients to 24 months, the total trial duration could be reduced by 18 months, with no increase in patient numbers in a non-inferiority design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Nunn
- Clinical Trials Unit, Medical Research Council, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|