De novo metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Why does locoregional control "always" matter?

De novo metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) constitutes 10% of recurrent/metastatic (RM) cases. Radiotherapy (RT) has a crucial role in the treatment of locally advanced HNSCC, however its application on RM diseases is still limited. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improves the survival of RM HNSCC, however median overall survival is still limited. Integration of locoregional RT with ICIs in de novo metastatic HNSCC represents a promising treatment option. This perspective aims to explore the role of the combination of locoregional and systemic treatment in improving outcomes for synchronous de novo metastatic HNSCC patients and highlights the principal crucial point in decision making.

Long Term Clinical Outcomes of a Cohort of Lung-Only Oligometastatic HNSCC Patients Treated with SBRT

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Oligometastatic disease in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a rare setting. Local ablative therapies are the most adopted strategies although no evidence-based recommendations are currently published. The aim of our analysis was to update and report on long-term clinical outcomes of a cohort of HNSCC patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung-only oligometastatic disease.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Eligible patients had 1 to 5 lung metastases. The oligometastatic pattern was classified as "de novo" (suitable for SBRT only) or "oligoprogressive" (after first line of systemic therapy). We evaluated time to progression (TTP) as the time from the last day of SBRT to disease progression or death from any cause. Predictive factors of better clinical outcome and survival analysis were performed by Cox regression and Kaplan Meier methods, respectively.

RESULTS

A cohort of 46 patients and 47 metastases were retrospectively evaluated. The median age was 67 years (range 37-86) and 87% of patients had a ECOG PS 0-1. HPV negative status (77%) and "de novo" oligometastatic pattern (78%) were reported by the majority of patients. After a median follow up of 28 months (range 2-88), median TTP and overall survival (OS) were 18 months (95% CI 4.8 - 31.2) and 62 months (95% CI 10,8 - 113.2), respectively. The median volume of planning target volume (PTV) was 20.4 cc (range 7.1-55.3). At univariate analysis, patients aged > 70 years reported a better TTP (p 0.013). No statistically significant correlation was observed in respect with gender (p 0.23), ECOG PS (p 0.34), oligometastatic pattern (p 0.13) and p16/HPV status (p 0.22). Out of 26 histologically proven metastases, we collected only 2 patients reporting concordance between p16/HPV positive status of primary tumor and lung metastases. Overall, 6 patients reported grade (G) 1-2 acute toxicity and no acute G3 adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggested that SBRT may improve clinical outcome prolonging time to progression and to systemic treatments in a properly selected cohort of HNSCC patients with lung-only oligometastatic disease. Distant metastases from HPV-related primary HNSCC should be tested for p16/HPV status given the clinical implications of HPV positivity for diagnosis and treatment.

Preoperative Radiotherapy of Soft Tissue Sarcoma with Simultaneous Integrated Boost: A Phase II Study

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy to 50 Gy in 25 fractions is delivered in operable Soft Tissue Sarcoma (STS) patients to downstage the tumor and improve resectability, although at the expense of increased risk of wound dehiscence. Nonetheless, clear margin resection (R0) may not be achieved in tumors located in proximity of critical structures such as the neurovascular bundle (NVB), resulting in impaired local control. The aim of this study is to increase R0 rate through addition of an IMRT boost to the potential sites of suboptimal resection in STS patients receiving neoadjuvant RT. We report hereby the dosimetric results and safety results from the first 5 patients enrolled in this trial.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We designed a prospective monocentric interventional single-arm Phase II study enrolling locally advanced STS eligible for surgery. RT is administered in 25 daily fractions to include the MRI-based Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) and peritumoral tissue at risk of microscopic spread (CTV1) to a dose of 50 Gy (2Gy/fraction), with SIB (Simultaneous Integrated Boost) intensification to the tumor/dissection plane interface (CTV2) to a dose of 60 Gy (2.4 Gy/fraction). CTV2 delineation is approved by both a Radiation Oncologist and Surgeon. A margin of 0.5 cm is applied to both CTV to obtain PTV1 and PTV2. Concurrent anthracyclines-based chemotherapy (ChT) is allowed up to 3 cycles. Primary endpoint is R0 resection rate. Secondary endpoints include pathologic complete response rate, objective response rate, overall survival, local and distant progression-free survival, acute and chronic toxicity rate. To assess an increase in R0 rate from 81% to 97% assuming β = 80% e α = 0.05, 33 patients will be included. Dose constraints are summarized in Table1. At least 95% of the PTV1 and PTV2 should be covered by 95% the prescription dose up to a maximum allowed dose of 107%.

RESULTS

Five patients were included. Tumor was located in the limbs and in the trunk in respectively 4 and 1 patient. Mean age was 47 years (range: 19-67). Concurrent chemotherapy was performed in 2 patients. Mean GTV size was 228.6 cm3 (range: 59.8-314.5). Mean PTV coverage by the 95% of the dose prescription was 98% (95-100) and 97% (95-100) in PTV1 and PTV2, respectively. Mean PTV1 and PTV2 Dmax were 61.6 Gy (range: 59-63) and 64.1 Gy (range:63-66), in both cases below the 107% threshold. Mean Bone Dmax was 55 Gy (56.6-61.8 Gy). Dmax to the skin corridor exceeded 20 Gy in 1 patient (range 12.5-58.1). While the NVB was overlapping the PTV2 in all cases, Dmax was below 66 Gy. At the time of this report, no Grade ≥3 acute skin toxicity was observed. Two patients underwent surgery with a radiological partial response (RECIST) and pathological complete response. No major wound complication was reported.

CONCLUSION

Planning goals of the first 5 enrolled patients are achieved in most cases. Preliminary results show a benign safety profile and promising tumor response rate.

Temporal evolution of quality of life in patients endoscopically treated for sinonasal malignant tumors

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study is to assess which factors may affect the quality of life (QoL) and its fluctuation over time in adult patients who received endonasal endoscopic oncologic sinus surgery (EOSS) for sinonasal malignancies (SNM) in our center.

METHODOLOGY

We analyzed EOSS cases for primary SNM from January 2015 to June 2020. For each patient, we have recorded the age at treatment, gender, smoking habits, use of psychotropic drugs for mood disorders, stage, histotype, type of surgical resection, need for skull-base reconstruction, development of postoperative major complications, and the use of adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). We evaluated the patient's performance status pre-treatment using the ECOG scale. Quality of life was measured using three questionnaires (SNOT-22; ASK-9; EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3).

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were enrolled in our study, of whom thirty-two (58.18%) received adjuvant IMRT. Overall, a significant improvement in all QoL outcomes was observed at eighteen months, while, female sex, higher ECOG scores, advanced stage of disease, and adjuvant IMRT were associated with worse QoL. After 18 months the delta in QoL between women and men worsened (in SNOT-22 and EORTC QLQ-GLOBAL) while if only the most fragile patients according to ECOG are considered, this difference was reduced for both tools.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis revealed that IMRT is the element that has the greatest impact on patient's quality of life, in association with the female sex, ECOG >2, and advanced stage of the disease.

Transfusional Approach in Multi-Ethnic Sickle Cell Patients: Real-World Practice Data From a Multicenter Survey in Italy

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a worldwide distributed hereditary red cell disorder characterized by recurrent acute vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs and anemia). Gold standard treatments are hydroxycarbamide (HC) and/or different red blood cell (RBC) transfusion regimens to limit disease progression. Here, we report a retrospective study on 1,579 SCD patients (median age 23 years; 802 males/777 females), referring to 34 comprehensive Italian centers for hemoglobinopathies. Although we observed a similar proportion of Caucasian (47.9%) and African (48.7%) patients, Italian SCD patients clustered into two distinct overall groups: children of African descent and adults of Caucasian descent. We found a subset of SCD patients requiring more intensive therapy with a combination of HC plus chronic transfusion regimen, due to partial failure of HC treatment alone in preventing or reducing sickle cell-related acute manifestations. Notably, we observed a higher use of acute transfusion approaches for SCD patients of African descent when compared to Caucasian subjects. This might be related to (i) age of starting HC treatment; (ii) patients' low social status; (iii) patients' limited access to family practitioners; or (iv) discrimination. In our cohort, alloimmunization was documented in 135 patients (8.5%) and was more common in Caucasians (10.3%) than in Africans (6.6%). Alloimmunization was similar in male and female and more frequent in adults than in children. Our study reinforces the importance of donor-recipient exact matching for ABO, Rhesus, and Kell antigen systems for RBC compatibility as a winning strategy to avoid or limit alloimmunization events that negatively impact the clinical management of SCD-related severe complications.

Impact of COVID-19 on patient-doctor interaction in a complex radiation therapy facility

PURPOSE

In the last months, Italy faced a COVID-19 emergency and implemented preventive measures in order to protect patients and healthcare providers from a disease outbreak. The pandemic control strategies impacted patient experience directly. Questionnaires evaluating patients reported measures (PREMs) may assess critical issues and represent a helpful tool to measure the patient perception of healthcare service. Our aim was to prospectively assess patient satisfaction about doctor-patient interaction in a high-volume radiation therapy and oncology center during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Cancer patients receiving either systemic and/or radiation treatment underwent a survey. Two validated questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, FACIT-TS-G version 1) and 14 specific questions evaluating patients' perception of COVID-19 measures were administered.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-five patients admitted to our department from 1-30 April 2020 completed the questionnaires. The majority (66.4%) of patients were women and the most common disease was breast cancer (40%). The average Global Health Status (GHS) of EORTC QLQ-C30 was 61.67. Emotional functioning, social, and cognitive domains obtained scores of 75.48, 80.13, and 84.67, respectively. FACIT-TS-G results revealed 120 patients rated the treatments effective and 108 patients thought the side effects were the same as expected or better. Most (89.6%) rated their treatment good, very good, or excellent. Concerning COVID-19-related questions, patients reported overall very good level of information.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the introduction of strict COVID-19 control measures, there was a high level of cancer outpatient satisfaction. The satisfaction levels may influence compliance, continuity of treatments, and patient-doctor communication, impacting the quality of clinical care in the next phases of the pandemic.

Palliative radiotherapy in older adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review

Locally advanced Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCCHN) represents a common oncologic pathology in older adults (OA). While radiotherapy represents a cornerstone in this context, it is unclear what is the optimal radiation regimen for SCCHN in the palliative setting, especially for OA. This article addresses issues related to palliative radiotherapy (PRT) in this setting with a focus on treatment modalities and toxicity. We also explore the use of quality of life and geriatric assessment in this setting. Medline, Scopus and Embase databases were queried for articles in this setting. We included studies published from January 1, 2000 through June 1, 2020, that were independently evaluated by two authors. Analyzed endpoints were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and PRT toxicities. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata v.14. A total of 33 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled median OS is 7.7 months, 2-years OS was worse for higher radiation dose (p = 0.02). The pooled median PFS was 5.4 months, PFS was influenced by EQD2 (p = 0.01), with patients receiving an EQD2 < 40 Gy that presented a poorer outcome. Regarding acute toxicities, most common pooled G3 toxicities were mucositis (7%) and dysphagia (15%). Among late toxicity, most common G3 toxicity was dysphagia in 7% of patients. Radiotherapy should be the most effective palliative treatment in symptomatic SCCHN OA. A tailored approach, guided by geriatric tools, would be indicated to choose the right therapy.

Will a tumor pandemic come after the COVID-19 pandemic? Head and Neck cancer perspective

The COVID-19 pandemic demands a reassessment of head and neck oncology treatment paradigms by posing several challenges for oncology services, with unprecedented pressure on the regional health care system. Since February 2020 this has severely disrupted health-care services, leading to accumulating clinic caseload and substantial delays for operations. The head and neck cancer services have been faced with the difficult task of managing the balance between infection risk to health-care providers and the risk of disease progression from prolonged waiting times. Herein, we share our experience in Firenze (Italy) and propose our action plan on the management of head and neck cancer services via multi-institution collaboration.

Head and neck reconstruction with pedicled flaps in the free flap era

Nowadays, the transposition of microvascular free flaps is the most popular method for management of head and neck defects. However, not all patients are suitable candidates for free flap reconstruction. In addition, not every defect requires a free flap transfer to achieve good functional results. The aim of this study was to assess whether pedicled flap reconstruction of head and neck defects is inferior to microvascular free flap reconstruction in terms of complications, functionality and prognosis. The records of consecutive patients who underwent free flap or pedicled flap reconstruction after head and neck cancer ablation from 2006 to 2015, from a single surgeon, in the AOUC Hospital, Florence Italy were analysed. A total of 93 patients, the majority with oral cancer (n = 59), were included, of which 64 were pedicled flap reconstructions (69%). The results showed no significant differences in terms of functional outcome, flap necrosis and complications in each type of reconstruction. Multivariate regression analysis of flap necrosis and functional impairments showed no associated factors. Multivariate regression analysis of complicated flap healing showed that only comorbidities remained an explaining factor (p = 0.019). Survival analysis and proportional hazard regression analysis regarding cancer relapse or distant metastasis, showed no significant differences in prognosis of patients concerning both types of reconstruction. In this retrospective, non-randomised study cohort, pedicled flaps were not significantly inferior to free flaps for reconstruction of head and neck defects, considering functionality, complications and prognosis.