1
|
Campedel L, Compérat E, Cancel-Tassin G, Varinot J, Pfister C, Delcourt C, Gobet F, Roumiguié M, Patard PM, Daniel G, Bigot P, Carrouget J, Eymerit C, Larré S, Léon P, Durlach A, Ruffion A, de Mazancourt ES, Decaussin-Petrucci M, Bessède T, Lebacle C, Ferlicot S, Robert G, Vuong NS, Philip M, Crouzet S, Matillon X, Mège-Lechevallier F, Lang H, Mouracade P, Lindner V, Gougis P, Cussenot O, Rouprêt M, Seisen T. Prognostic value of programmed death ligand-1 and programmed death-1 expression in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. BJU Int 2023; 132:581-590. [PMID: 37488983 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the prognostic value of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and programmed death-1 (PD-1) expression in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective multicentre study was conducted in 283 patients with UTUC treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) between 2000 and 2015 at 10 French hospitals. Immunohistochemistry analyses were performed using 2 mm-core tissue microarrays with NAT105® and 28.8® antibodies at a 5% cut-off for positivity on tumour cells and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes to evaluate PD-L1 and PD-1 expression, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to determine the independent predictors of recurrence-free (RFS), cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Overall, 63 (22.3%) and 220 (77.7%) patients with UTUC had PD-L1-positive and -negative disease, respectively, while 91 (32.2%) and 192 (67.8%) had PD-1-positive and -negative disease, respectively. Patients who expressed PD-L1 or PD-1 were more likely to have pathological tumour stage ≥pT2 (68.3% vs 49.5%, P = 0.009; and 69.2% vs 46.4%, P < 0.001, respectively) and high-grade (90.5% vs 70.0%, P = 0.001; and 91.2% vs 66.7%, P < 0.001, respectively) disease with lymphovascular invasion (52.4% vs 17.3%, P < 0.001; and 39.6% vs 18.2%, P < 0.001, respectively) as compared to those who did not. In multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusting for each other, PD-L1 and PD-1 expression were significantly associated with decreased RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-3.08, P = 0.023; and HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.01-2.54, P = 0.049; respectively), CSS (HR 2.73, 95% CI 1.48-5.04, P = 0.001; and HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.12-3.45, P = 0.019; respectively) and OS (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.23-3.53, P = 0.006; and HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.05-2.78, P = 0.031; respectively). In addition, multivariable Cox regression analyses evaluating the four-tier combination of PD-L1 and PD-1 expression showed that only PD-L1/PD-1-positive patients (n = 38 [13.4%]) had significantly decreased RFS (HR 3.07, 95% CI 1.70-5.52; P < 0.001), CSS (HR 5.23, 95% CI 2.62-10.43; P < 0.001) and OS (HR 3.82, 95% CI 2.13-6.85; P < 0.001) as compared to those with PD-L1/PD-1-negative disease (n = 167 [59.0%]). CONCLUSIONS We observed that PD-L1 and PD-1 expression were both associated with adverse pathological features that translated into an independent and cumulative adverse prognostic value in UTUC patients treated with RNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Campedel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
- GRC n°5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Eva Compérat
- GRC n°5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Departement of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Géraldine Cancel-Tassin
- GRC n°5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- CeRePP, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Justine Varinot
- Departement of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Pierre Bigot
- Department of Urology, Angers Hospital, Angers, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Anne Durlach
- Department of Pathology, Reims Hospital, Reims, France
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Bessède
- Department of Urology, Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Cédric Lebacle
- Department of Urology, Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Sophie Ferlicot
- Department of Pathology, Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | | | - Nam-Son Vuong
- Department of Urology, Bordeaux Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Magali Philip
- Department of Pathology, Bordeaux Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | | | - Hervé Lang
- Department of Urology, Strasbourg Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | | | | | - Paul Gougis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- GRC n°5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- CeRePP, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC n°5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC n°5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baboudjian M, Lebacle C, Gondran-Tellier B, Hutin M, Olivier J, Ruggiero M, Panayotopoulos P, Dominique I, Millet C, Bergerat S, Freton L, Betari R, Matillon X, Chebbi A, Caes T, Patard PM, Szabla N, Sabourin L, Dariane C, Rizk J, Madec FX, Nouhaud FX, Rod X, Fiard G, Pradere B, Peyronnet B. Who Is at Risk of Death after Renal Trauma? An Analysis of Thirty-Day Mortality after 1,799 Cases of Renal Trauma. Urol Int 2023; 107:165-170. [PMID: 35390797 DOI: 10.1159/000521554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of the study was to report the 30-day mortality (30DM) after renal trauma and identify the risk factors associated with death. METHODS The TRAUMAFUF project was a retrospective multi-institutional study including all patients with renal trauma admitted to 17 French hospitals between 2005 and 2015. The included population focused on patients of all age groups who underwent renal trauma during the study period. The primary outcome was death within 30 days following trauma. The multivariate logistic regression model with a stepwise backward elimination was used to identify predictive factors of 30DM. RESULTS Data on 1,799 renal trauma were recorded over the 10-year period. There were 59 deaths within 30 days of renal trauma, conferring a 30DM rate of 3.27%. Renal trauma was directly involved in 5 deaths (8.5% of all deaths, 0.3% of all renal trauma). Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that age >40 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20-3.99; p = 0.01), hemodynamic instability (OR 4.67; 95% CI: 2.49-9; p < 0.001), anemia (OR 3.89; 95% CI: 1.94-8.37; p < 0.001), bilateral renal trauma (OR 6.77; 95% CI: 2.83-15.61; p < 0.001), arterial contrast extravasation (OR 2.09; 95% CI: 1.09-3.96; p = 0.02), and concomitant visceral and bone injuries (OR 6.57; 95% CI: 2.41-23.14; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of 30DM. CONCLUSION Our large multi-institutional study supports that the 30DM of 3.27% after renal trauma is due to the high degree of associated injuries and was rarely a consequence of renal trauma alone. Age >40 years, hemodynamic instability, anemia, bilateral renal trauma, arterial contrast extravasation, and concomitant visceral and bone lesions were predictors of death. These results can help clinicians to identify high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Baboudjian
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Conception Academic Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Cedric Lebacle
- Department of Urology, University of Paris Sud, CHU Bicetre, Paris, France
| | - Bastien Gondran-Tellier
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Conception Academic Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Marine Hutin
- Department of Urology, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Marina Ruggiero
- Department of Urology, University of Paris Sud, CHU Bicetre, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Clémentine Millet
- Department of Urology, University of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | - Lucas Freton
- Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Reem Betari
- Department of Urology, University of Amiens, Amiens, France
| | | | - Ala Chebbi
- Department of Urology, University of Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Thomas Caes
- Department of Urology, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | | | | | - Laura Sabourin
- Department of Urology, University of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Charles Dariane
- Department of Urology, University of Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Jerome Rizk
- Department of Urology, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | | | | | - Xavier Rod
- Department of Urology, University of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Gaelle Fiard
- Department of Urology, University of Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baloche P, Szabla N, Freton L, Hutin M, Ruggiero M, Dominique I, Millet C, Bergerat S, Panayotopoulos P, Betari R, Matillon X, Chebbi A, Caes T, Patard PM, Brichart N, Sabourin L, Dariane C, Baboudjian M, Gondran-Tellier B, Lebacle C, Madec FX, Nouhaud FX, Rod X, Fiard G, Pradere B, Peyronnet B. Impact of Hospital Volume on the Outcomes of Renal Trauma Management. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 37:99-105. [PMID: 35243394 PMCID: PMC8883196 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Some health care systems have set up referral trauma centers to centralize expertise to improve trauma management. There is scant and controversial evidence regarding the impact of provider’s volume on the outcomes of trauma management. Objective To evaluate the impact of hospital volume on the outcomes of renal trauma management in a European health care system. Design, setting, and participants A retrospective multicenter study, including all patients admitted for renal trauma in 17 French hospitals between 2005 and 2015, was conducted. Intervention Nephrectomy, angioembolization, or nonoperative management. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Four quartiles according to the caseload per year: low volume (eight or fewer per year), moderate volume (nine to 13 per year), high volume (14–25/yr), and very high volume (≥26/yr). The primary endpoint was failure of nonoperative management defined as any interventional radiology or surgical procedure needed within the first 30 d after admission. Results and limitations Of 1771 patients with renal trauma, 1704 were included. Nonoperative management was more prevalent in the very-high- and low-volume centers (p = 0.02). In a univariate analysis, very high hospital volume was associated with a lower risk of nonoperative management failure than low (odds ratio [OR] = 0.54; p = 0.05) and moderate (OR = 0.48; p = 0.02) hospital volume. There were fewer nephrectomies in the high- and very-high-volume groups (p = 0.003). In a multivariate analysis, very high volume remained associated with a lower risk of nonoperative management failure than low (OR = 0.48; p = 0.04) and moderate (OR = 0.42; p = 0.01) volume. Study limitations include all the shortcomings inherent to its retrospective multicenter design. Conclusions In this multicenter study, management of renal trauma varied according to hospital volume. There were lower rates of nephrectomy and failure of nonoperative management in very-high-volume centers. These results raise the question of centralizing the management of renal trauma, which is currently not the case in our health care system. Patient summary In this study, management of renal trauma varied according to hospital volume. Very-high-volume centers had lower rates of nephrectomy and failure of nonoperative management.
Collapse
|
4
|
Prudhomme T, Roumiguié M, Péricart S, Doumerc N, Lesourd M, Patard PM, Gamé X, Soulié M, Thoulouzan M. Assessment of oncological and functional outcomes of retropubic radical prostatectomy: An academic center experience. Prog Urol 2021; 31:1123-1132. [PMID: 34565670 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report perioperative, pathological, oncological and functional outcomes of a contemporary series of retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), performed by one experienced surgeon. METHODS We analyzed data from a prospectively gathered database of consecutive patients who were treated by an RRP as first-line treatment for localized prostate cancer, from January 2014 to December 2019, in a single French academic center. RESULTS Overall, 364 patients were included. Median age and PSA were 65.7 years and 8.0ng/mL. According to D'Amico risk classification, 13.7% patients had a low-risk prostate cancer, 41.5% a favorable intermediate-risk, 23.4% an unfavorable intermediate-risk and 21.4% a high-risk prostate cancer. The rates of pT2 and pT3 were 48.6% (n=177) and 51.4% (n=187), respectively. The rates of non-nerve sparing surgery (NSS), unilateral NSS and bilateral NSS were 19.5% (n=71), 32.7% (n=119) and 47.8% (n=174). Total positive surgical margin (PSM) rate was 12.6% (n=46). Total pT2 PSM and pT3 PSM rates were 0.6% (n=1) and 24.1% (n=45) and achieved a statistical difference (P<0.001). At a median follow-up of 1.9-year, biochemical recurrence (BCR) occurred in 47 (12,9%) patients. Extracapsular extension was associated with a poor BCR-free survival as compared to organ confined disease (P<0.0001). At 2.7 years of follow-up, urinary continence rate was 88% (322/364). After exclusion of non-NSS RRP and non-interpretable questionnaires (score 1-4), median IIEF-5 score was 16 (8-20). CONCLUSION Retropubic radical prostatectomy ensures optimal pathological and functional results, in a current predominantly population of intermediate-risk prostate cancer and high-risk prostate cancer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Prudhomme
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Rangueil, Toulouse, France.
| | - M Roumiguié
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - S Péricart
- Department of Pathology, institut universitaire du cancer, Toulouse, France
| | - N Doumerc
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - M Lesourd
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - P M Patard
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - X Gamé
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - M Soulié
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - M Thoulouzan
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Geiger S, Kocher N, Illinsky D, Xylinas E, Chang P, Dewey L, Wagner AA, Petros F, Matin SF, Tobert C, Tracy C, Patard PM, Roumiguie M, Monteiro LL, Kassouf W, Raman JD. Comparison of the Comprehensive Complication Index and Clavien-Dindo systems in predicting perioperative outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:1780-1785. [PMID: 32944540 PMCID: PMC7475662 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2020.01.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Complications can occur following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in 20–40% of patients. The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) is an alternative grading system to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) grading system that aggregates all complications experienced by a patient on a continuous (as opposed to categorical) scale. We investigate whether the cumulative nature of CCI renders it superior to CD in predicting perioperative course after RNU. Methods The records of 596 patents who underwent RNU at 7 academic medical centers from 2005 to 2015 were reviewed. Complications occurring within 30 days of RNU were annotated using both the CD and CCI classification systems. Logistic regression was used to determine associations between CD and CCI with perioperative covariates as well as measures of convalescence [hospital length of stay (LOS) and readmission]. Results A total of 377 men and 219 women with a median age of 71, BMI of 27, and Charlson comorbidity score of 4 were included. Over half underwent a minimally invasive RNU. Median LOS following RNU was 6.0 days (range, 1–37 days) and readmission within 30-days occurred in 45 (8%) patients. Overall, 136 patients (23%) experienced a post-operative complication with 91 having a single complication and 45 with multiple (range, 2–6); 44 (7%) patients had Clavien III or greater complications, and the median CCI for those patients experiencing a complication was 20.9 (range, 8.7–100). Both the upper quartile of CCI (≥75th %) and major CD complications were associated with higher baseline Charlson score, ECOG ≥2, and CKD stage ≥ III (all P<0.05). However, only the upper quartile of CCI was associated with LOS (8.9 vs. 5.4 days, P<0.01) and hospital readmission (OR 3.2, 95% CI: 1.9–5.6, P=0.02) after RNU. Conclusions The CD and CCI classification systems both are associated with similar baseline and perioperative characteristics for RNU patients. However, the cumulative nature of the CCI allows for superior prediction of postoperative course after RNU including LOS and readmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Geiger
- Division of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Neil Kocher
- Division of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Dan Illinsky
- Division of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | | - Peter Chang
- Division of Urology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lauren Dewey
- Division of Urology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew A Wagner
- Division of Urology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Firas Petros
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Conrad Tobert
- Department of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Chad Tracy
- Department of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Pierre-Marie Patard
- Urology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Mathieu Roumiguie
- Urology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Urology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Jay D Raman
- Division of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chebbi A, Peyronnet B, Giwerc A, Freton L, Hutin M, Olivier J, Langouet Q, Ruggiero M, Dominique I, Millet C, Bergerat S, Panayatopoulos P, Betari R, Matillon X, Caes T, Patard PM, Szabla N, Brichart N, Boehm A, Sabourin L, Guleryuz K, Dariane C, Lebacle C, Rizk J, Gryn A, Madec FX, Rod X, Fiard G, Pradere B, Pfister C, Nouhaud FX. Observation vs. early drainage for grade IV blunt renal trauma: a multicenter study. World J Urol 2020; 39:963-969. [PMID: 32447442 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03255-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to compare observation and early drainage by ureteral stenting in patients with blunt renal trauma and urinary extravasation. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective national multicenter study was performed including all patients admitted for renal trauma at 17 hospitals between 2005 and 2015. Patients presenting with a urinary extravasation on initial imaging were considered for inclusion. Patients were divided in two groups according to the initial approach: observation vs. early drainage by ureteral stent (within 48 h after admission). The primary endpoint was the persistence of urinary extravasation on follow-up imaging. RESULTS Out of 1799 patients with renal trauma, 238 were included in the analysis (57 in the early drainage and 181 in the observation group). In the early drainage group, 29 patients had persistent urinary extravasation vs. 77 in the observation group (50.9% vs. 42.5%; p value = 0.27). The rates of secondary upper urinary tract drainage did not differ significantly between the early drainage group (26.4%) and the observation group (16%) (p = 0.14). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of secondary nephrectomy (0% vs. 2.8%; p = 0.34), and death from trauma (0% vs. 1.8%; p = 0.99). In multivariate analysis, early drainage remained not statistically associated with persistence of urinary extravasation on follow-up imaging (OR = 1.35; p = 0.36) CONCLUSION: In this multicenter cohort, observation was not different from early drainage in terms of persistent urinary extravasation after grade IV blunt renal trauma. Further randomized controlled prospective trials are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ala Chebbi
- Urology, University of Rouen, Rouen, France.
- Service d'urologie, Hopital Charles Nicolle, 37 boulevard Gambetta, 76000, Rouen, France.
| | | | | | | | - Marine Hutin
- Urology, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | - Marina Ruggiero
- Urology, University of Paris Sud, CHU Bicetre, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Reem Betari
- Urology, University of Amiens, Amiens, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Laura Sabourin
- Urology, University of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | | | - Cédric Lebacle
- Urology, University of Paris Sud, CHU Bicetre, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Xavier Rod
- Urology, University of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Gaelle Fiard
- Urology, University of Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Prudhomme T, Marquette T, Péré M, Patard PM, Michiels C, Sallusto F, Rigaud J, Glémain P, Kamar N, Blancho G, Soulié M, Rischmann P, Karam G, Gamé X, Robert G, Branchereau J. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Endoscopic Surgical Procedures in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Comparison Between Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate, GreenLight Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate, and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate. J Endourol 2019; 34:184-191. [PMID: 31588793 DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The main objective of this multicentric retrospective pilot study was to evaluate the 1-year follow-up safety (i.e., minor [Clavien-Dindo I-II] and major [Clavien-Dindo ≥III] complications) of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), GreenLight photoselective vaporization of the prostate (GL PVP), and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) performed after kidney transplantation (KT). The secondary objectives were to evaluate the efficacy and to assess the impact of these procedures on graft function. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively included all KT recipients who underwent a HoLEP or GL PVP or TURP for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in three French university centers. Results: From January 2013 to April 2018, 60 BPH endoscopic surgical procedures in KT recipients were performed: 17 HoLEP (HoLEP group), 9 GL PVP (GL PVP group), and 34 TURP (TURP group). Age, body mass index, preoperative serum creatinine, preoperative International Prostatic Symptom Score, preoperative Qmax, preoperative prostate-specific antigen, medical history of acute urinary retention (AUR), urinary tract infection (UTI), and indwelling urethral catheter were similar in all study groups. Mean preoperative prostate volume was higher in HoLEP group. The rate of overall postoperative complications was statistically higher in the HoLEP group (11/17 [64.7%] vs 1/9 [11.1%] vs 12/34 [35.3%] in HoLEP group, GL PVP group, and TURP group, respectively, p = 0.02), with higher rate of long-term UTI and AUR. Qmax improved in all groups after operation. Delta postoperative month 12-preoperative serum creatinine was similar in the all groups. Conclusions: Although our study is underpowered, the rate of postoperative complications is higher with HoLEP procedure, in comparison with GL PVP, for the treatment of BPH after KT. One-year efficacy is similar in HoLEP, GL PVP, and TURP groups. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Prudhomme
- Department of Urology, Kidney Transplantation and Andrology, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Thibault Marquette
- Department of Urology, Kidney Transplantation and Andrology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Morgane Péré
- Biostatistics Unit, Research Board, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Pierre-Marie Patard
- Department of Urology, Kidney Transplantation and Andrology, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Clément Michiels
- Department of Urology, Kidney Transplantation and Andrology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Federico Sallusto
- Department of Urology, Kidney Transplantation and Andrology, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Jérôme Rigaud
- Institut de Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Pascal Glémain
- Institut de Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Gilles Blancho
- Institut de Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Michel Soulié
- Department of Urology, Kidney Transplantation and Andrology, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Pascal Rischmann
- Department of Urology, Kidney Transplantation and Andrology, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Georges Karam
- Institut de Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Xavier Gamé
- Department of Urology, Kidney Transplantation and Andrology, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Grégoire Robert
- Department of Urology, Kidney Transplantation and Andrology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Julien Branchereau
- Institut de Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Panayotopoulos P, Pradere B, Olivier J, Hutin M, Ruggiero M, Dominique I, Freton L, Millet C, Bergerat S, Betari R, Chebbi A, Caes T, Patard PM, Szabla N, Brichart N, Boehm A, Sabourin L, Guleryuz K, Prudhomme T, Dariane C, Lebacle C, Rizk J, Gryn A, Madec FX, Nouhaud FX, Rod X, Fiard G, Peyronnet B. PD02-10 WHICH IS THE PLACE FOR IMMEDIATE RADIO-EMBOLIZATION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF HEMODYNAMICALLY INSTABLE PATIENTS WITH KIDNEY TRAUMA ? RESULTS OF THE MULTICENTRIC NATIONAL FRENCH STUDY TRAUMAFUF. J Urol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
9
|
PRADERE B, Roumiguié M, Thoulouzan M, Gas J, Patard PM, Gamé X, Doumerc N, Rischmann P, Soulié M, Beauval JB. PD29-09 APPLICABILITY OF BRIGANTI NOMOGRAM: AN ABSOLUTE REQUIREMENT BEFORE LYMPH NODE DISSECTION IN INTERMEDIATE-RISK PROSTATE CANCER? ASSESSMENT OF THE EXTERNAL APPLICABILITY. J Urol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.1384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
10
|
Beauval JB, Cabarrou B, Gandaglia G, Patard PM, Ouzzane A, de la Taille A, Soulié M, Briganti A, Ploussard G, Rozet F, Roumiguié M. External validation of a nomogram for identification of pathologically favorable disease in intermediate risk prostate cancer patients. Prostate 2017; 77:928-933. [PMID: 28370267 DOI: 10.1002/pros.23348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2017] [Accepted: 03/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish an external validation of the new nomogram from Gandaglia et al which provides estimates of the probability of pathological favorable disease in pre-operatively defined intermediate-risk PCa. PATIENTS AND METHODS Overall, 2928 intermediate-risk PCa patients according to the D'Amico classification undergoing RP and bilateral lymph node dissection in seven academic centres between 2000 and 2011. Pathologically favorable PCa was defined as low-grade organ-confined disease. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was obtained to quantify the overall accuracy (Area Under the Curve, AUC) of the model to predict specimen-confined (SC) disease. Calibration curve was then constructed to illustrate the relationship between the risk-estimates obtained by the model and the observed proportion of SC disease. Kaplan-Meier method was used for PSA recurrence-free survival (PSA-RFS) assessment. RESULTS Median age was 68 years. 10.6% patients finally presented pathologically favorable disease characteristics at RP. A higher PSAD (OR = 0.01; 95%CI = 0.00-0.04; P < 0.0001) and percentage of positive cores (OR = 0.97; 95%CI = 0.96-0.98; P < 0.0001) were associated with a reduced probability of favorable disease at RP in multivariate analysis. ROC curve analysis showed strongest accuracy of the model (AUC = 0.82; 95%CI = 0.79-0.84). Favorable PCa had a significantly better PSA recurrence-free survival rates as compared to unfavorable PCa after RP (94.2% vs 74.4% at 4 years, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS This external validation of the Gandaglia nomogram shows relevant accuracy with one out of ten patients in this intermediate risk PCa group with pathologically proven organ-confined disease. This validated risk calculator can help physician to distinguish favorable intermediate risk PCa that can be treated by conservative approach or safer nerve-sparing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Baptiste Beauval
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Bastien Cabarrou
- Department of Statistics, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Pierre-Marie Patard
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Adil Ouzzane
- Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | | | - Michel Soulié
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Vita-Salute University San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Mathieu Roumiguié
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|