p53 protein regulates the effects of amifostine on apoptosis, cell cycle progression, and cytoprotection

To determine the role of p53 protein on the cellular effects of amifostine, we used molecularly engineered HCT116 colon cancer cells in which the p53 gene was inactivated by targeted homologous recombination or p53 protein was degraded by high-level expression of papillomavirus E6 protein. Amifostine induced a G1 arrest and protected against paclitaxel toxicity in p53-proficient but not in p53-deficient cells. In the absence of p53 protein, amifostine enhanced the cytotoxicity of paclitaxel. In addition, treatment of HCT116 cells with amifostine alone resulted in apoptotic cell death. Compared with p53-deficient cells, p53-proficient cells exhibited low-level resistance to amifostine-induced apoptosis. Amifostine induced the expression of p53 protein in p53-proficient cells and the expression of p21 protein in both p53-proficient and -deficient cells. These findings indicate that amifostine-induced G1 arrest and cytoprotection are mediated via a pathway that is dependent on p53 protein and that amifostine-induced expression of p21 protein is not sufficient to sustain a G1 arrest or to mediate cytoprotection. In addition, these findings identify p53 protein as a mechanism of resistance to amifostine-induced apoptosis.British

Modulation of docetaxel-induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest by all- trans retinoic acid in prostate cancer cells

We report that all- trans retinoic acid (ATRA) enhanced the toxicity of docetaxel against DU145 and LNCaP prostate cancer cells, and that the nature of the interaction between ATRA and docetaxel was highly synergistic. Docetaxel-induced apoptotic cell death was associated with phosphorylation and hence inactivation of Bcl-2. ATRA enhanced docetaxel-induced apoptosis and combined treatment with ATRA and docetaxel resulted in down-regulation of Bcl-2. Docetaxel caused phosphorylation and hence inactivation of cdc2 kinase result ing in G2/M arrest. ATRA inhibited docetaxel-induced phosphorylation of cdc2 resulting in activation of cdc2 kinase and partial reversal of the G2/M arrest. ATRA also inhibited docetaxel-induced activation of MAPK indicating that the effects of docetaxel and ATRA on cdc2 phosphorylation are dependent on MAPK. We conclude that ATRA synergistically enhances docetaxel toxicity by down-regulating Bcl-2 expression and partially reverses the docetaxel-induced G2/M arrest by inhibiting docetaxel-induced cdc2 phosphorylation in a pathway that is dependent on MAPK.

Epidermal growth factor enhances cisplatin-induced apoptosis by a caspase 3 independent pathway

PURPOSE

Activation of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor has previously been shown to increase the sensitivity of cancer cells to DNA-damaging agents, including cisplatin, UV-B, and gamma-radiation. We now investigated the mechanisms by which EGF enhances the sensitivity of human ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin.

RESULTS

The effect of EGF on cisplatin sensitivity could not be entirely explained by alterations in the cellular detoxification of cisplatin by glutathione or DNA repair of transcribed genes, as assessed by a plasmid reactivation assay. Furthermore, EGF did not affect the levels of several proteins that regulate apoptotic pathways, including bcl2, bclXL, bax and p53. Cisplatin treatment resulted in activation of caspase 3 and subsequent cleavage of specific substrates containing the DEVD (Asp-Glu-Val-Asp) amino acid sequence, including PARP (poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase). The EGF-mediated increase in cisplatin-induced apoptosis, however, did not result in increased caspase 3 activity. Moreover, apoptosis induced by cisplatin alone was completely inhibited by the caspase 3 inhibitor DEVD-CHO, whereas cell death induced by combined treatment with cisplatin and EGF was not prevented by inhibition of caspase 3.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that, although cisplatin alone induces apoptosis by a caspase 3 dependent pathway, EGF enhances cisplatin-induced cell death by activating an apoptotic pathway that is independent of caspase 3.

P53 modulates the effect of loss of DNA mismatch repair on the sensitivity of human colon cancer cells to the cytotoxic and mutagenic effects of cisplatin

This study examined how the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system and p53 interact to maintain genomic integrity in the presence of the mutagenic stress induced by cisplatin (DDP). Sensitivity to the cytotoxic and mutagenic effect of DDP was assessed using a panel of sublines of the MMR-deficient HCT116 colon carcinoma cells in which MMR function had been restored by transfer of a copy of MLH1 on chromosome 3 or in which p53 function had been disabled by expression of HPV-16 E6. Loss of p53 function by expression of E6 in MMR-proficient HCT116+ ch3 cells conferred only 1.1-2.0-fold resistance to a panel of commonly used chemotherapeutic agents, whereas disruption of p53 in MMR-deficient HCT116 cells resulted in substantial levels of resistance to some agents (paclitaxel, 1.9-fold; gemcitabine, 2.7-fold; 6-thioguanine, 3.3-fold; and etoposide, 4.4-fold) but sensitization to other agents (topotecan, 2.5-fold; and DDP, 3.3-fold). Loss of MMR or p53 alone had only a minor effect on sensitivity to the mutagenic effect of DDP as measured by the appearance of variants resistant to 6-thioguanine, etoposide, topotecan, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel in the population 10 days later (1.0-2.4-fold), whereas loss of both p53 and MMR had a more profound effect (1.7-6.5-fold). Loss of both p53 and MMR increased the basal frequency insertion/deletion mutations detected by a shuttle vector-based assay to a greater extent than loss of either alone. In association with DDP-induced injury, loss of p53 or MMR alone resulted in 1.2- and 1.7-fold more mutations, whereas loss of both resulted in a 5.1-fold increase in mutant frequency. Examination of the impact of loss of p53 and/or MMR on the DDP-induced cell cycle checkpoint activation, p53 induction, ability of the cell to tolerate adducts in its DNA, and the rate of disappearance of platinum from genomic DNA indicated the effects of the loss of p53 and/or MMR on all of these parameters, suggesting a multifactorial etiology for the changes in sensitivity to the cytotoxic and mutagenic effects of DDP. These results indicate that p53 and MMR can cooperate to control sensitivity to the cytotoxic effect of DDP and to limit its mutagenic potential in the colon cancer cells.

Effect of c-Abl tyrosine kinase on the cellular response to paclitaxel-induced microtubule damage

DNA damage has been shown to activate c-Abl tyrosine kinase. We now report that, in addition to DNA damage, microtubule damage induced by paclitaxel results in activation of c-Abl kinase. In 3T3 cells, the presence of c-Abl kinase increased paclitaxel-induced cell death. In Abl-proficient cells, paclitaxel produced a marked and prolonged G2/M arrest which peaked at 24 h and a rapid and marked induction of p21(WAF1)which also peaked at 24 h. In Abl-deficient cells, the G2/M arrest induced by paclitaxel was less prominent and shorter in duration and the effect of paclitaxel on p21(WAF1)expression was reduced and delayed. Paclitaxel had no effect on p53 expression and MAPK phosphorylation. These findings indicate that, in 3T3 cells, c-Abl kinase facilitates cell death and regulates G2/M arrest in response to paclitaxel-induced microtubule damage in a pathway that is dependent on p21(WAF1)and independent of MAPK activity.

Increase in tumor GADD153 mRNA level following treatment correlates with response to paclitaxel

PURPOSE

We investigated the relationship between the basal and treatment-induced change in the tumor expression of the drug resistance gene MDR1 and the cellular injury response gene GADD153, and clinical response to paclitaxel treatment.

METHODS

MDR1 and GADD153 mRNA levels were measured by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in tumor samples obtained by fine needle aspiration biopsy from 14 patients before and 24 h after paclitaxel infusion.

RESULTS

There was no difference between responders and non-responders with respect to either the basal MDR1 mRNA level or the change in MDR1 mRNA level at 24 h after treatment (P = 0.464). Likewise, there was no difference in basal GADD153 mRNA level between responders and non-responders. However, there was a significantly greater increase in GADD153 mRNA at 24 h in responders compared with non-responders (P = 0.005). An increase in GADD153 mRNA level of 1.5-fold or higher predicted response with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in GADD153 mRNA level reflects chemotherapy-induced damage sufficient to be manifest as a clinically detectable reduction in tumor volume. Measurement of the change in GADD153 mRNA level successfully identified patients destined to respond as early as 24 h post-treatment.

A phase II/pharmacokinetic trial of high-dose progesterone in combination with paclitaxel

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of high-dose progesterone, an inhibitor of P glycoprotein, on the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of paclitaxel.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 29 patients with various tumors were treated with single-agent paclitaxel (125 mg/m2 administered over 3 h once every 3 weeks) until progression of disease, at which point high-dose progesterone (3 g administered i.v. over 24 h) was added to the paclitaxel treatment program in 20 patients (13 women, 7 men). Pharmacokinetic studies of paclitaxel administered alone and with progesterone were performed in eight patients.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic parameters of paclitaxel were highly variable. High-dose progesterone increased the peak plasma levels (3.00 +/- 0.94 vs. 4.15 +/- 1.63 microM; P = 0.029; mean +/- SD) and the area under the curve (AUC; 14.3 +/- 4.75 vs. 17.3 +/- 5.59 microM x h; P = 0.006) of paclitaxel. The absolute neutrophil and platelet nadir counts did not differ significantly between the paclitaxel and the combined treatment cycles. Three of the 20 patients documented to have progressive disease on paclitaxel alone had partial responses when high-dose progesterone was added to the paclitaxel regimen.

CONCLUSION

Progesterone had a statistically significant impact on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel. The addition of high-dose progesterone to paclitaxel is feasible, but the small number of patients prevents conclusions being drawn about the clinical efficacy of combined progesterone and paclitaxel.

Loss of DNA mismatch repair facilitates reactivation of a reporter plasmid damaged by cisplatin

In addition to recognizing and repairing mismatched bases in DNA, the mismatch repair (MMR) system also detects cisplatin DNA adducts and loss of MMR results in resistance to cisplatin. A comparison was made of the ability of MMR-proficient and -deficient cells to remove cisplatin adducts from their genome and to reactivate a transiently transfected plasmid that had previously been inactivated by cisplatin to express the firefly luciferase enzyme. MMR deficiency due to loss of hMLH1 function did not change the extent of platinum (Pt) accumulation or kinetics of removal from total cellular DNA. However, MMR-deficient cells, lacking either hMLH1 or hMSH2, generated twofold more luciferase activity from a cisplatin-damaged reporter plasmid than their MMR-proficient counterparts. Thus, detection of the cisplatin adducts by the MMR system reduced the efficiency of reactivation of the damaged luciferase gene compared to cells lacking this detector. The twofold reduction in reactivation efficiency was of the same order of magnitude as the difference in cisplatin sensitivity between the MMR-proficient and -deficient cells. We conclude that although MMR-proficient and -deficient cells remove Pt from their genome at equal rates, the loss of a functional MMR system facilitates the reactivation of a cisplatin-damaged reporter gene.

Induction of JNK and c-Abl signalling by cisplatin and oxaliplatin in mismatch repair-proficient and -deficient cells

Loss of DNA mismatch repair has been observed in a variety of human cancers. Recent studies have shown that loss of DNA mismatch repair results in resistance to cisplatin but not oxaliplatin, suggesting that the mismatch repair proteins serve as a detector for cisplatin but not oxaliplatin adducts. To identify the signal transduction pathways with which the detector communicates, we investigated the effect of loss of DNA mismatch repair on activation of known damage-responsive pathways, and recently reported that cisplatin differentially activates c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) and c-Abl in repair-proficient vs.-deficient cells. In the current study, we directly compared differential activation of these pathways by cisplatin vs. oxaliplatin. The results confirm that cisplatin activates JNK kinase 5.7 +/- 1.5 (s.d.)-fold more efficiently in DNA mismatch repair-proficient than repair-deficient cells, and that the c-Abl response to cisplatin is completely absent in DNA mismatch repair-deficient cells. In contrast, there was no detectable activation of the JNK or c-Abl kinases in DNA mismatch repair-proficient or -deficient cells exposed to oxaliplatin. The present study demonstrates that, despite the similarity of the adducts produced by cisplatin and oxaliplatin, they appear to be recognized by different detectors. The DNA mismatch repair system plays an important part in the recognition of cisplatin adducts, and activation of both the JNK and c-Abl kinases in response to cisplatin damage is dependent on the detector function of the DNA mismatch repair proteins. In contrast, this detector does not respond to oxaliplatin adducts.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intraperitoneal topotecan

OBJECTIVE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics of topotecan when administered by the intraperitoneal route.

METHODS

A dose-escalating Phase I trial was conducted in which fifteen % of the total dose was given as an intraperitoneal bolus in two litres of D5W and the remainder was given as a continuous intraperitoneal infusion over 24 hours. Treatments were given every 21 days. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed at the recommended phase II dose.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients received a total of 43 cycles at 21-day intervals. The maximum tolerated dose was 4 mg/m2 and acute dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. Other toxicities included leukopenia, anemia, emesis, fever, and abdominal pain. Although no objective responses were achieved, five of ten patients with ascites had a decrease in fluid accumulation with administration of intraperitoneal topotecan. The recommended phase II dose is 3 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetic analysis performed at a dose of 3 mg/m2 demonstrated that elimination from the peritoneal cavity followed second-order kinetics with k1 = 1.6 hr(-1), k2 = 0.3 hr(-1) and first and second-phase half-lives of 0.49 and 2.7 hours, respectively. Plasma pharmacokinetic behavior was best described by first-order kinetics with k = 0.5 hr(-1) and a half-life of 3.9 hours. The pharmacologic advantage, expressed as the peritoneal to plasma AUC ratio was 31.2.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraperitoneal administration of topotecan at 3 mg/m2 results in a substantial increase in drug exposure for the peritoneal cavity without compromising systemic exposure; this may be beneficial for the treatment of patients with ovarian cancer or intraperitoneal carcinomatosis.

Observations on control of N2 and N3 neck disease in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck by intra-arterial chemoradiation

Patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer with N2 and N3 neck disease have a poor prognosis and are at risk to fail regionally despite combined surgery and radiation. Twenty-two patients with N2 and N3 neck disease (and T3-4 primaries) were treated with intra-arterial, high-dose cisplatin (CDDP), 150 mg/m2 per week for 4 weeks, and concurrent radiation. All patients were followed for at least 2 years or until death from any cause. Twenty patients had a complete response at the primary site. Two of the 20 with a complete response later had a neck recurrence and died. Five patients with palpable nodes after treatment underwent fine-needle aspiration (FNA), one of which was positive and two suggestive of cancer. Six neck dissections were performed in this group, only two of which had positive nodes. This chemoradiation protocol may offer reasonable control of N2 and N3 neck disease in advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer. Neck dissection appeared to be necessary in only those patients with nodes 8 weeks after treatment in whom FNA was positive or suggestive of cancer. Because of the relatively small size of this series, additional accrual and monitoring of such patients is planned.

all-trans retinoic acid enhances cisplatin-induced apoptosis in human ovarian adenocarcinoma and in squamous head and neck cancer cells

Cisplatin exerts its cytotoxicity by inducing apoptosis. Similarly, all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) causes apoptosis in certain cells. We studied the interaction of cisplatin and ATRA in human ovarian adenocarcinoma cells 2008, in human head and neck squamous carcinoma cells UMSCC10b, and in their respective cisplatin-resistant sub-lines. ATRA enhanced the cytotoxicity of cisplatin. The interaction of the drugs was synergistic in combination index-isobologram analyses (combination index >0.5 at 50% cell survival) in all of the cell lines tested. ATRA inhibited the cellular accumulation of the cisplatin analogue [3H] cis-dichloroethylenediamineplatinum(II) by 22-33% in three of four cell lines tested but did not alter the cellular content of reduced glutathione. The expression of Bcl-2 relative to Bax decreased more after combined treatment with cisplatin and ATRA than after either drug alone. The apoptotic mechanism of cell death was confirmed by demonstrating cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase and by morphological analysis. The combined treatment with ATRA and cisplatin induced apoptosis in significantly more cells than either drug alone. We conclude that ATRA enhances the cytotoxicity of cisplatin by facilitating apoptosis in ovarian and head and neck carcinoma cells.

Differential induction of c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase and c-Abl kinase in DNA mismatch repair-proficient and -deficient cells exposed to cisplatin

The c-Abl nonreceptor tyrosine kinase and the c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK/stress-activated protein kinase) are activated during the injury response to the DNA-damaging agent cisplatin. Loss of DNA mismatch repair activity results in resistance to cisplatin in human cancer cells, suggesting that the mismatch repair proteins function as a detector for cisplatin DNA adducts. To identify signaling pathways activated by this detector, we investigated the effect of the loss of DNA mismatch repair function on the ability of cisplatin to activate the JNK and c-Abl kinases. The results demonstrate that cisplatin activates JNK kinase 3.8 +/- 0.2-fold more efficiently in DNA mismatch repair-proficient than repair-deficient cells, and that activation of c-Abl is completely absent in the DNA mismatch repair-deficient cells. Furthermore, the results show that cisplatin-induced activation of JNK occurs through a stress-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase 1-independent mechanism. We conclude that activation of JNK and c-Abl by cisplatin is in part dependent upon the integrity of DNA mismatch repair function, suggesting that these kinases are part of the signal transduction pathway activated when mismatch repair proteins recognize cisplatin adducts in DNA.

Synergy between tamoxifen and cisplatin in human melanoma cells is dependent on the presence of antiestrogen-binding sites

We have demonstrated previously that cisplatin (DDP) and tamoxifen (TAM) act synergistically to kill human melanoma T-289 cells, and that the observed synergy is lost in the 3-fold TAM-resistant subline, 289/TAM6. We have identified the intracellular antiestrogen-binding sites (AEBSs), defined by their ability to bind antiestrogens while having no affinity for estrogen, as a possible mediator of this synergy. We report here that [3H]TAM binds to AEBSs, as defined by the ability of N,N-diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl)phenoxy]ethanamine-HCl, an AEBS-specific ligand, to compete with [3H]TAM binding. Furthermore, we have characterized the number of binding sites and their affinity for [3H]TAM by Scatchard analysis in whole-cell lysates, microsomal fractions, and nuclear fractions of both cell lines by competing [3H]TAM binding with increasing concentrations of unlabeled TAM. These data demonstrate that the loss of a high-affinity AEBS from the nuclear fraction of the 289/TAM6 cell line correlates with the loss of synergy between DDP and TAM in these cells. This implicates AEBSs as a critical component of the mechanism that mediates the synergistic interaction of DDP and TAM in human melanoma cells.

In vitro and in vivo resistance to cisplatin in cells that have lost DNA mismatch repair

In vitro studies have shown that loss of DNA mismatch repair due to lack of either hMSH2 or hMLH1 activity results in low-level resistance to cisplatin but not to oxaliplatin, an analogue that produces a different type of DNA adduct. No information is currently available on whether this low-level resistance is sufficient to result in enrichment of mismatch repair-deficient cells during drug exposure in vitro or to account for clinical failure of treatment in vivo. Mixed populations of cells containing a minority of DNA mismatch repair-deficient cells constitutively expressing green fluorescence protein were exposed repeatedly in vitro to cisplatin and oxaliplatin. Treatment with cisplatin resulted in a gradual enrichment for DNA mismatch repair-deficient cells, whereas treatment with oxaliplatin did not. MSH2-/- and MSH2+/+ embryonic stem cells were established as xenografts in athymic nude mice. Animals were treated 48 h after tumor implantation with a single LD10 dose of either cisplatin or oxaliplatin. MSH2-/- tumors were significantly less responsive to cisplatin than MSH2+/+ tumors, whereas there was no difference in sensitivity to oxaliplatin. These results demonstrate that the degree of cisplatin resistance conferred by loss of DNA mismatch repair is sufficient to produce both enrichment of mismatch repair-deficient cells during treatment in vitro and a large difference in clinical responsiveness in vivo. The results identify loss of DNA mismatch repair as a mechanism of resistance to cisplatin but not oxaliplatin.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of high dose tamoxifen and weekly cisplatin in patients with metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND

The authors have previously demonstrated that tamoxifen (TAM) is synergistic with cisplatin (DDP) in patients with metastatic melanoma. In vitro studies have demonstrated that TAM/DDP synergy is dependent on a TAM effect that is currently under investigation. In an attempt to improve the complete response rate of this regimen, the authors initiated a Phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of TAM that could be safely administered with weekly DDP.

METHODS

TAM was started on Day 1 at a dose of 80 mg/day and was increased by 40 mg to the MTD in groups of 3 patients. DDP (80 mg/m2) was begun on Day 2 and repeated weekly for a total of 3 weeks. During Week 4, the patients were not treated with DDP but instead evaluated for response. If disease stabilization or regression was documented, the patients received a second 3-week cycle of DDP and were then reevaluated for response. Patients with progressive disease were removed from the study.

RESULTS

In 25 consecutive patients, the overall response rate was 20%. No responses were observed in patients treated with TAM at a dose of <240 mg/day. Among 13 patients treated at or above this dose, there were 2 complete responses, 3 partial responses, 2 mixed responses, and 6 patients with progressive disease. The overall response rate for patients treated with 240 mg of TAM or higher was 38.5%. Dose-limiting toxicity, which occurred at a TAM dose of 280 mg/day, was primarily hematologic and gastrointestinal in nature. There was one toxic death (due to septic neutropenia) at this dose. There were no episodes of thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

A TAM dose of 240 mg/day is the recommended Phase II dose. Based on the 38.5% overall response rate at this dose, the authors have initiated a Phase II study.

Expression of the DNA mismatch repair proteins hMLH1 and hPMS2 in normal human tissues

hMLH1 and hPMS2 are part of the DNA mismatch repair complex. Mutations in these genes have been linked to hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer; they also occur in a variety of sporadic cancers. Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry demonstrated that hMLH1 and hPMS2 are widely expressed nuclear proteins with a distribution pattern very similar to that previously described for hMSH2. These observations showing similar localization of hMLH1 and hPMS2 with hMSH2 are consistent with the biochemical function of these proteins in DNA mismatch repair.

The role of DNA mismatch repair in platinum drug resistance

Loss of DNA mismatch repair occurs in many types of tumors. The effect of the loss of DNA mismatch repair activity on sensitivity to cisplatin and a panel of analogues was tested using two pairs of cell lines proficient or deficient in this function. HCT116+ch2, a human colon cancer cell line deficient in hMLH1, was 2.1-fold resistant to cisplatin and 1.3-fold resistant to carboplatin when compared to a subline complemented with chromosome 3 expressing a wild-type copy of hMLH1. Likewise, the human endometrial cancer cell line HEC59, which is deficient in hMSH2, was 1.8-fold resistant to cisplatin and 1.5-fold resistant to carboplatin when compared to a subline complemented with chromosome 2 with a wild-type hMSH2. In contrast to cisplatin and carboplatin, which form the same types of adducts in DNA, there was no difference in sensitivity between the DNA mismatch repair-proficient and -deficient cell lines for oxaliplatin, tetraplatin, transplatin, JM335, or JM216. The formation of protein-DNA complexes that contained hMSH2 and hMLH1 was documented by mobility shift assay when nuclear extracts were incubated with DNA platinated with cisplatin but not with oxaliplatin. These results demonstrate a correlation between failure of the DNA mismatch repair proteins to recognize the platinum adduct and low-level resistance, suggesting a role for the DNA mismatch repair system in generating signals that contribute to the generation of apoptotic activity. They also identify the use of drugs whose adducts are not recognized as a strategy for circumventing resistance due to loss of DNA mismatch repair.

Determinants of tamoxifen sensitivity control the nature of the synergistic interaction between tamoxifen and cisplatin

The cytotoxic effect of tamoxifen (TAM) was investigated in the T-289 melanoma cell line, as well as the 289 DDP3 cisplatin (DDP)-resistant and the 289 TAM6 TAM-resistant variant melanoma cell lines to determine the effect of drug resistance on synergy. T-289 melanoma cells were made DDP or TAM resistant through chronic exposure to increasing concentrations of the respective drugs. Whereas DDP resistance could be overcome by increasing the concentration of TAM, the development of TAM resistance completely abolished synergy. TAM resistance was not related to the development of estrogen receptors, decreased TAM uptake, or the increased expression of the mdr-1 gene. TAM did not inhibit the action of Topoisomerase 1; however, TAM did induce apoptosis in the 289 melanoma cells. In contrast, TAM did not induce apoptosis in the TAM-resistant variant 289 TAM6 cells. To our knowledge, these are the first data associating TAM resistance with the inhibition of apoptosis.

Loss of DNA mismatch repair in acquired resistance to cisplatin

Selection of cells for resistance to cisplatin, a well-recognized mutagen, could result in mutations in genes involved in DNA mismatch repair and thereby to resistance to DNA-alkylating agents. Parental cells of the human ovarian adenocarcinoma cell line 2008 expressed hMLH1 when analyzed with immunoblot. One subline selected for resistance to cisplatin (2008/A) expressed no hMLH1, whereas another (2008/C13*5.25) expressed parental levels. Microsatellite instability was readily demonstrated in 2008/A cells but not in 2008 and in 2008/C13*5.25 cells. In addition, the 2008/A cells were 2-fold resistant to methyl-nitro-nitrosoguanidine and had a 65-fold elevated mutation rate at the HPRT locus as compared to 2008 cells, both of which are consistent with the loss of DNA mismatch repair in these cells. To determine whether the loss of DNA mismatch repair itself contributes to cisplatin resistance, studies were carried out in isogenic pairs of cell lines proficient or defective in this function. HCT116, a human colon cancer cell line deficient in hMLH1 function, was 2-fold resistant to cisplatin when compared to a subline complemented with chromosome 3 and expressing hMLH1. Similarly, the human endometrial cancer cell line HEC59, which expresses no hMSH2, was 2-fold resistant to cisplatin when compared to a subline complemented with chromosome 2 that expresses hMSH2. Therefore, the selection of cells for resistance to cisplatin can result in the loss of DNA mismatch repair, and loss of DNA mismatch repair in turn contributes to resistance to cisplatin.

Cisplatin and taxol activate different signal pathways regulating cellular injury-induced expression of GADD153

Signal transduction pathways activated by injury play a central role in coordinating the cellular responses that determine whether a cell survives or dies. GADD153 expression increases markedly in response to some types of cellular injury and the product of this gene causes cell cycle arrest. Using induction of GADD153 as a model, we have investigated the activation of the cellular injury response after treatment with taxol and cisplatin (cDDP). Activation of the GADD153 promoter coupled to the luciferase gene and transfected into human ovarian carcinoma 2008 cells correlated well with the increase in endogenous GADD153 mRNA after treatment with taxol but not after treatment with cDDP. Following treatment with cDDP, the increase in endogenous GADD153 mRNA was 10-fold greater than the increase in GADD153 promoter activity. Likewise, at equitoxic levels of exposure (IC80), cDDP produced a 5-fold greater increase in endogenous GADD153 mRNA than taxol. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor tyrophostin B46 had no significant effect on the ability of taxol to activate the GADD153 promoter, but inhibited activation of the GADD153 promoter by cDDP in a concentration-dependent manner. Tyrphostin B46 synergistically enhanced the cytotoxicity of cisplatin; however, the same exposure had no significant effect on the cytotoxicity of taxol. We conclude that (1) taxol and cDDP activate GADD153 promoter activity through different mechanisms; (2) the signal transduction pathway mediating induction by cDDP involves a tyrosine kinase inhibitable by tyrphostin B46; and (3) that inhibition of this signal transduction pathway by tyrphostin synergistically enhances cDDP toxicity.

Enhancement of drug sensitivity of human malignancies by epidermal growth factor

We have previously shown that epidermal growth factor (EGF) enhances the in vitro and in vivo sensitivity of human ovarian carcinoma 2008 cells to cisplatin. EGF was found to enhance selectively the in vivo toxicity of cisplatin to 2008 cell xenografts without altering the toxicity of cisplatin to non-malignant target tissues such as the kidney or bone marrow. We now show that recombinant human EGF (rhEGF) enhances the cisplatin sensitivity of cell lines representative of many other types of malignancies in addition to ovarian carcinoma, including cancers of the head and neck, cervix, colon, pancreas and prostate, as well as non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung. In addition, rhEGF was found to sensitise cells to other platinum-containing drugs and several other classes of chemotherapeutic agents. rhEGF sensitised 2008 cells not only to cisplatin, but also to carboplatin and tetraplatin, as well as taxol, melphalan and 5-fluorouracil. We conclude that modulation of drug sensitivity by rhEGF is observed in cell lines representative of many human malignancies and for multiple classes of chemotherapeutic agents, indicating that it alters one or more components of the cellular damage response that are both common between cell lines and classes of drugs and fundamental to survival.

Tamoxifen delays the development of resistance to cisplatin in human melanoma and ovarian cancer cell lines

The development of resistance to cisplatin (DDP) occurs rapidly both in vitro and in vivo, and constitutes a major obstacle to effective therapy. We have previously demonstrated that there is a highly synergistic interaction between tamoxifen (TAM) and DDP against cell lines representative of three different human cancers: melanoma, ovarian carcinoma and small-cell lung cancer. The purpose of these studies was to determine if TAM interferes with the development of resistance to DDP. T-289 melanoma cells and 2008 ovarian cancer cells were cultured with increasing concentrations of DDP +/- TAM in an attempt to induce resistance to DDP. At various time points the cells were removed from culture and the degree of resistance to DDP was quantitated. Concurrent exposure to TAM and DDP decreased both the rate and the absolute magnitude of resistance to DDP in both melanoma and ovarian cancer cell lines. In the T-289 cell line the rate was decreased by a factor of 3.4 +/- 1.4 (P < 0.05), while in the 2008 cell line the rate was decreased by a factor of 2.4 (P < 0.01). TAM decreases the rate as well as the absolute magnitude of in vitro resistance to DDP in both melanoma and ovarian cancer cell lines. These data suggest that the concurrent administration of TAM and DDP may result in a delay in the development of resistance to DDP which may have important clinical implications in the design of DDP-containing regimens.

Signaling and drug sensitivity

Even though alterations in receptor and nonreceptor kinases are involved in the development of human cancer, many cancer cell lines still retain their responsiveness to growth factors. We have investigated the hypothesis that cellular signaling events regulate the sensitivity of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents. In 2008 human ovarian carcinoma cells, activation of a number of different transduction pathways resulted in a 2 to 4-fold increase in the sensitivity to cisplatin. These signaling events include pathways activated by the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) receptor, bombesin receptor, protein kinase A (PKA), and protein kinase C (PKC). Enhanced sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents is presumed to be mediated by phosphorylation of critical target protein(s). beta-tubulin has been identified as one such target for the protein kinase signaling cascade. For other signal transduction pathways the key substrates that regulate drug sensitivity have not yet been identified. Recent work has shown that DNA damaging agents activate signaling cascades one of which involves the Src, Ras, and Raf proteins as intermediates and results in induction of a number of genes, including c-fos, c-jun, and the growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible (gadd) genes. This signaling cascade has been shown to involve activation of protein kinase C and to have a protective function. With the growing understanding of how signaling events relate to damage response and drug sensitivity, new and potentially useful strategies for modulating drug sensitivity are evolving.

Synergistic interaction between cisplatin and taxol in human ovarian carcinoma cells in vitro

Taxol, a unique tubulin active agent, was found to demonstrate a marked schedule-dependent synergistic interaction with cisplatin (DDP) in the killing of human ovarian carcinoma 2008 cells in vitro as determined by median effect analysis. The interaction was highly synergistic when 19 h taxol exposure was followed by 1 h concurrent exposure to taxol and DDP. The combination indices (CIs) on this schedule were 0.11 +/- 0.1, 0.25 +/- 0.15 and 0.39 +/- 0.14 at 20%, 50% and 80% cell kill respectively. However, the interaction was antagonistic when 1 h exposure to DDP was followed by 20 h exposure to taxol, or when cells were exposed to DDP and taxol for 1 h concurrently. When taxol preceded DDP, synergy was also observed with the 11-fold DDP-resistant 2008/C13*5.25 subline, which yielded CI values of 0.21 +/- 0.02, 0.30 +/- 0.11 and 0.31 +/- 0.17 at 20%, 50% and 80% cell kill respectively. At an IC50 concentration, taxol had no effect on [3H]cis-dichloro(ethylenediamine) platinum uptake, on the permeability of the plasma membrane or on glutathione or metallothionein levels in 2008 or 2008/C13*5.25 cells. Mitotic arrest in these cells was observed only at taxol concentrations well above those required for synergy with DDP, suggesting that the mechanism underlying the synergistic interaction was not a taxol-induced alteration in cell cycle kinetics. Of additional interest was the fact that the 2008/C13*5.25 cells were hypersensitive to taxol, and that this was partially explained by an alteration in the biochemical pharmacology of taxol. Although cellular taxol accumulation reached steady state within 2 h in both cell lines, taxol efflux was slower and the taxol was more extensively bound in 2008/C13*5.25 cells than in 2008 cells. In addition, the 2008/C13*5.25 cells had only 55% of the parental levels of beta-tubulin content. However, in another pair of DDP-sensitive and -resistant ovarian cell lines no taxol hypersensitivity and no change in beta-tubulin content was observed, indicating that the DDP-resistant and taxol-hypersensitive phenotypes do not segregate together. We conclude that taxol interacts synergistically with DDP in a manner that is highly schedule dependent, and that the hypersensitivity of 2008/C13*5.25 cells no taxol is unrelated to the mechanism of synergy. These in vitro observations suggest that drug schedule will be an important determinant of the activity and toxicity of the DDP and taxol drug combination in clinical studies.

Tamoxifen modulation of cisplatin cytotoxicity in human malignancies

Recent clinical trials have indicated that addition of tamoxifen (TAM) to a combination of cisplatin (DDP), carmustine and dacarbazine markedly increases the overall objective response rate of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. Previous studies have determined that there is remarkable synergy between TAM and DDP in a human melanoma cell line T-289. Using the technique of median effect analysis, in clonogenic assay, we observed a highly synergistic interaction between TAM and DDP. To determine whether or not this synergistic interaction was unique to human melanomas, or is generally observed in other types of malignancy, we examined the nature of this interaction using a human ovarian carcinoma and small cell lung cancer cell line. Synergy was observed in both cell lines. In the case of all 3 types of malignancy, synergy was observed at concentrations of both TAM and DDP that can be achieved in patients. Our results demonstrate that cytotoxic synergy between the DDP and TAM is observed in cell lines established from multiple types of human malignancies. It is important to note that the synergy between TAM and DDP is not dependent on the presence of estrogen or progesterone receptors. Since TAM is well tolerated by patients, it is particularly attractive as a potential agent with which to sensitize human tumors to DDP.

Phase I/pharmacokinetic study of high-dose progesterone and doxorubicin

PURPOSE

We developed a new formulation of progesterone that permits administration of up to 10 g of progesterone as a continuous intravenous infusion over 24 hours and conducted a phase I clinical trial to determine whether progesterone could modulate the in vivo cytotoxicity of the P-glycoprotein substrate doxorubicin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients with advanced malignancies were treated with increasing doses of progesterone and a fixed dose of 60 mg/m2 of doxorubicin given as an intravenous bolus 2 hours after starting a 24-hour intravenous infusion of progesterone.

RESULTS

Progesterone enhanced doxorubicin-induced myelotoxicity in a dose-dependent fashion without altering the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin. The steady-state plasma concentration of progesterone at a dose level of 4 g was 4.1 +/- 0.9 mumol/L, which was higher than the minimal concentration required to reverse multidrug resistance (MDR) in vitro.

CONCLUSION

Progesterone enhanced the hematologic toxicity of doxorubicin without altering its pharmacokinetics, suggesting that progesterone could modulate P-glycoprotein at the level of pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells. Adequate tissue concentrations of progesterone could be achieved in vivo to modulate doxorubicin toxicity in the bone marrow and thus potentially in tumor tissue as well. Selectivity may potentially be gained by using hematopoietic growth factors to offset the enhanced hematologic toxicity of doxorubicin while leaving the enhancement of toxicity to tumor cells unchanged.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intraperitoneal ormaplatin

Ormaplatin is a cisplatin analog which has demonstrated activity against cisplatin-resistant tumors in preclinical studies. We delivered 28 cycles to 14 patients in a phase I trial of intraperitoneal ormaplatin given every 28 days. The maximum tolerated dose was 88.4 mg/m2 and acute dose-limiting toxicity was abdominal pain. Other toxicities include nausea, emisis, fever, and severe neuropathy seen in 1 patient at a cumulative dose of 399 mg/m2. No objective responses were observed. Hematologic toxicity was mild. The dose recommended for future trials of intraperitoneal ormaplatin is 66.5 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetic analysis performed at a dose of 66.5 mg/m2 demonstrated that the initial phase of elimination from the peritoneal cavity follows first-order kinetics with k = 0.69 hr-1 and half-life of 1.4 hr. Plasma pharmacokinetic behavior is best described by biexponential model with k1 = 0.369 hr-1, k2 = 0.107 hr-1, and first half-life of 2.9 hr and second half-life of 8.4 hr. Pharmacologic advantage, calculated by ratio of peritoneal to plasma AUC, is 17.1. If site-specific activity is demonstrated, then the intraperitoneal route of administration of ormaplatin at 66.5 mg/m2 may be beneficial.

Tamoxifen modulation of cisplatin resistance in patients with metastatic melanoma. A biologically important observation

BACKGROUND

Treatment with the four-drug combination of dacarbazine (DTIC), carmustine (BCNU), cisplatin (DDP), and tamoxifen (TAM) has resulted in an overall response rate of more than 50% in patients with metastatic melanoma. Deletion of TAM from the regimen resulted in a decrease in the response rate to 10%, suggesting an important role for TAM. The authors have subsequently demonstrated that TAM is highly synergistic with DDP in a human melanoma cell line, T-289, which supports the clinical observation that TAM is important in this regimen. The authors conducted a clinical trial to determine whether the addition of TAM can overcome established DDP resistance in patients with malignant melanoma.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic melanoma were initially treated with DDP 100 mg/m2 alone until they demonstrated DDP resistance. On the next cycle of treatment, patients received TAM 40 mg by mouth four times a day on the day before DDP treatment followed by 20 mg by mouth daily for the rest of the 3-week cycle plus the same dose of DDP.

RESULTS

Among 24 patients treated with DDP alone there were one complete and two partial responses. Twenty patients, in whom single-agent DDP failed, were treated with the combination of TAM and DDP. Of these 20 patients, 19 were evaluable for response. Among these 19 patients, there were three partial responses (16%) and three mixed responses (16%), for an overall response rate of 32% (0% was expected) (P < 0.001). If the three mixed responses are eliminated, the statistical significance is of borderline significance (P = 0.058).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of TAM to DDP can overcome established DDP resistance in a subset of patients with metastatic melanoma.

In vitro modulation of cisplatin accumulation in human ovarian carcinoma cells by pharmacologic alteration of microtubules

We have previously shown that forskolin and 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX) increased accumulation of cisplatin (DDP) in DDP-sensitive 2008 human ovarian carcinoma cells in proportion to their ability to increase cAMP. Since the major function of cAMP is to activate protein kinase A, it was conjectured that the stimulation of DDP accumulation was mediated by a protein kinase A substrate. We now show that exposure of 2008 cells to forskolin resulted in phosphorylation of a prominent 52-kD membrane protein. Microsequencing of the band demonstrated it to be human beta-tubulin. Similarly, pretreatment of 2008 cells with the microtubule stabilizing drug taxol increased platinum accumulation in a dose-dependent manner. In 11-fold DDP-resistant 2008/C13*5.25 cells, decreased DDP accumulation was associated with enhanced spontaneous formation of microtubule bundles and decreased expression of beta-tubulin and the tubulin-associated p53 antioncogene relative to 2008 cells. 2008/C13*5.25 cells had altered sensitivity to tubulin-binding drugs, being hypersensitive to taxol and cross-resistant to colchicine. We conclude that pharmacologic alterations of tubulin enhance accumulation of DDP, and that the DDP-resistant phenotype in 2008/C13*5.25 cells is associated with tubulin abnormalities.

Tamoxifen modulation of cisplatin sensitivity in human malignant melanoma cells

Tamoxifen (TAM) markedly increases the response rate of malignant melanoma to treatment with cisplatin (DDP), carmustine, and dacarbazine, and we have previously reported that there is a highly synergistic interaction between TAM and DDP with respect to the cytotoxic effect against the human melanoma cell line T-289 (E. F. Mc Clay et al., Cancer Res., 52: 6790-6796, 1992). The mechanism underlying synergy was investigated by examining the effect of selection for either DDP or TAM resistance on the magnitude of the synergy quantitated by median effect analysis. The combination index at 50% cell kill was 0.26 +/- 0.02 (SD) for parental T-289 cells (indicating marked synergy), 0.54 +/- 0.14 for cells selected for low-level DDP resistance (indicating moderate synergy), and 1.39 +/- 0.20 for cells selected for low-level TAM resistance (indicating antagonism). Thus, factors that regulate DDP sensitivity have a moderate effect on reducing the DDP/TAM synergy, but determinants of TAM sensitivity have a major effect. The known biochemical effects of TAM include antagonism of estrogen at the estrogen receptor (ER) and inhibition of calmodulin and protein kinase C activity. T-289 cells contained undetectable amounts of ER by the dextran-coated charcoal assay and expressed only trace amounts of ER mRNA, and another more avid ER antagonist, droloxifene, failed to interact synergistically with DDP. N-(6-Aminohexyl)-5-chloro-1-naphthalenesulfonamide (W-7), a potent calmodulin antagonist, failed to demonstrate synergy with DDP, and activation of protein kinase C, instead of interacting antagonistically with DDP, yielded synergy. TAM did not alter the cell cycle phase perturbation produced by exposure to DDP alone. We conclude that the synergy between TAM and DDP is not mediated by the effects of TAM on the ER, calmodulin, protein kinase C, or cell cycle regulation. However, the factors that determine cellular sensitivity to TAM also determine whether TAM interacts synergistically with DDP.

Regulation of initial vinblastine influx by P-glycoprotein

P-glycoprotein (PGP) is an energy-dependent efflux pump that serves to protect cells against the cytotoxicity of many natural product drugs including vinblastine (VBL). In this study we investigated the role of PGP in regulating initial VBL influx. The apparent influx of VBL, measured over the first 20 s, was 2-fold lower in KB-GRC1 cells expressing a transfected mdr1 gene at high level than in non-expressing parental KB-3-1 cells. Inhibition of PGP efflux function with dipyridamole increased the influx rate constant by 4.0-fold in the KB-GRC1 cells but only 2.1-fold in the KB-3-1 cells. Verapamil, another inhibitor of PGP-mediated efflux, increased the initial influx rate constant by 2.7-fold in the KB-GRC1 cells but only 1.4-fold in the KB-3-1 cells. Inhibition of PGP function by depletion of ATP increased influx by 6.8-fold and 2.2-fold in the two cell types, respectively. Mutation of PGP at both ATP binding sites abolished its ability to limit initial influx. Thus, VBL is serving as an efficient substrate for the efflux pump even within the first few seconds of drug exposure, consistent with the hypothesis that PGP may directly efflux drug from the cell membrane.

Modulation of cisplatin sensitivity and growth rate of an ovarian carcinoma cell line by bombesin and tumor necrosis factor-alpha

A twofold change in the cisplatin (DDP) sensitivity of 2008 human ovarian carcinoma cells is sufficient to reduce tumor response in vivo. The DDP sensitivity of these cells can be enhanced by activation of the epidermal growth factor and protein kinase C signal transduction pathways. We report here that two endogenous growth factors, bombesin and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha), enhanced DDP sensitivity by factors of 1.7 +/- 0.1 (SD)-fold and 1.8 +/- 0.1 (SD)-fold, respectively. Both agents also produced sensitization in an 11-fold DDP-resistant 2008 subline. Neither bombesin nor TNF alpha changed the accumulation of DDP, glutathione content, or glutathione-S-transferase activity in 2008 cells. However, a 2-h exposure to both bombesin and TNF alpha was sufficient to increase 2008 cloning efficiency by up to 2.6 +/- 0.1 (SD)-fold and 2.2 +/- 0.1 (SD)-fold, and it increased average colony size by 1.35 +/- 0.1 (SD)-fold and 1.55 +/- 0.1 (SD)-fold, respectively. Bombesin increased intracellular free calcium, and this was blocked by the bombesin receptor-specific antagonist SC196, demonstrating that 2008 cells have functional bombesin receptors. These results indicate that bombesin and TNF alpha can enhance sensitivity to DDP in both DDP sensitive and resistant variants of a human ovarian carcinoma and that both agents serve as growth factors for this tumor.

Enhancement of the loss of multiple drug resistance by hydroxyurea

Gene amplification is one mechanism whereby tumor cells can become resistant to antineoplastic agents. Unstably amplified genes occur either on submicroscopic circular pieces of extrachromosomal DNA called episomes or on small acentric chromosomes called double minutes. Double minutes are frequently associated with cells containing amplified drug-resistance genes. Human epidermoid carcinoma KBV1 cells contain unstably amplified mdr1 genes and overexpress P glycoprotein, resulting in decreased intracellular drug accumulation. In this cell line, a nonlethal concentration of hydroxyurea accelerated the rate of loss of vinblastine resistance once vinblastine had been removed from the culture medium. After removal of vinblastine, KBV1 cells exposed to hydroxyurea for the time required to complete 12 cell doublings accumulated more vinblastine than control cells grown in the absence of hydroxyurea. In contrast, hydroxyurea had no effect on vinblastine sensitivity and accumulation in parental drug-sensitive KB-3-1 cells. Hydroxyurea also had no effect on sensitivity to cisplatin in cisplatin-resistant human ovarian carcinoma 2008/C13* cells, indicating that hydroxyurea's effect on drug sensitivity was specific for a drug-resistance phenotype associated with unstably amplified drug-resistance genes. These results indicate that, after removing selective pressure, hydroxyurea accelerates loss of resistance to vinblastine and increases accumulation of vinblastine in KBV1 cells, presumably by accelerating loss of amplified mdr1 genes and thus P glycoprotein.

Epidermal growth factor regulates the in vitro sensitivity of human ovarian carcinoma cells to cisplatin

Cisplatin (DDP) is the most effective drug for the treatment of human ovarian cancer, but the mechanisms that determine sensitivity to the cytotoxic action of DDP are not well understood. Treatment of two human ovarian carcinoma cell lines with epidermal growth factor (EGF) simultaneously increased sensitivity to DDP and caused a persistent change in morphology in the absence of any mitogenic effect. Sensitization to DDP was shown to be dependent on both EGF concentration and EGF receptor number in C127 mouse fibroblasts expressing the human EGF receptor after transfection with a pBPV plasmid construct containing the human EGF receptor gene under control of the transferrin receptor 3'-inducible regulator. Sensitization of human ovarian carcinoma cells to DDP was not blocked by inhibition of protein synthesis. EGF did not enhance sensitivity to DDP or alter morphology in DDP-resistant human ovarian carcinoma cells despite the presence of functional EGF receptors on these cells. These results showed that elements of the signal transduction pathway activated by EGF determined cellular sensitivity to DDP, and that a DDP-resistant phenotype is associated with a defect in this signal transduction pathway.

Cardiobacterium hominis endocarditis in a patient with a hypersensitivity reaction to penicillin. Successful treatment with partial resection of the posterior mitral valve leaflet and antibiotic therapy with cefazolin

A 43-year-old patient with preexisting mitral valve prolapse and Cardiobacterium hominis endocarditis with partial destruction of the posterior mitral valve leaflet is described. Successful treatment was achieved with partial resection of the posterior mitral valve leaflet and antibiotic therapy. Because of a hypersensitivity reaction, initial therapy with penicillin G and gentamicin was stopped and substituted with cefazolin. No relapse of endocarditis was observed after 12 months of follow-up. Using micro broth dilution technique the isolated strain was shown to be most susceptible to penicillin G, cephalothin, and ciprofloxacin, with minimal inhibitory concentrations of 0.00025, 0.004, and 0.002 mg/l, respectively; and with minimal bactericidal concentrations (99.9% killing) of 0.25, 0.12, and 0.008 mg/l, respectively. We conclude that cephalosporins of the first generation or ciprofloxacin may be good alternatives to penicillin G in the treatment of C. hominis infection in patients known to be hypersensitive to penicillin.

Heat induced radial segmentation of leukocyte nuclei in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica and other inflammatory diseases

Heat induced radial segmentation of leukocyte nuclei is an in vitro phenomenon accompanying inflammatory diseases. We studied 62 patients with suspected polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) to determine, whether heat induced radial segmentation can help in discriminating PMR from other conditions. At the initial presentation patients with PMR had more radial segmentation formation than patients with other inflammatory conditions. Prednisone induced a rapid and marked decrease in radial segmentation formation in patients with PMR. This latter finding was much less marked in patients with other inflammatory conditions. We conclude that heat induced radial segmentation at the initial presentation and during prednisone treatment can help in discriminating PMR from other inflammatory conditions.

Fulminant group A streptococcal infections. Report of two cases

We describe two female patients presenting with spontaneous peritonitis and fulminant Streptococcus pyogenes (Strep. pyogenes) septicemia and shock. Both patients recovered completely upon immediate antibiotic therapy, initially with broad range combination therapy effective against Strep. pyogenes, which was switched to penicillin G when culture results became available. This isolated strain in case 1 was M-type 28, which is the M-type most often isolated from vaginal swabs (as commensal) and from blood from patients with puerperal sepsis. Patient 1 had signs and symptoms of a toxic shock-like syndrome, including rapid onset of fever and shock, skin rash, desquamation of palms and soles, and multisystem involvement with vomiting, diarrhea, myalgia, renal failure, and severe disorientation without focal neurological deficits.