The effect of following best practice reporting recommendations on legal and community evaluations of forensic examiners reports

Commentators have recommended that forensic scientists' reports contain various disclosures to facilitate comprehension. However, little research has explored whether following best practice recommendations for disclosure impacts on receivers' impressions of the evidence. We examined whether forensic science reports that are more compliant with these best practice recommendations reduced overvaluing of the evidence and sensitized legal and community decision-makers to evidence quality. Across three experiments, 240 legal practitioners/trainees and 566 community decision-makers were presented with a fingerprint or footwear report that was either compliant or non-compliant with best practice recommendations. Participants were then asked to make evaluations and decisions based on the report. We found mixed effects of report compliance. Report compliance affected community participant's evaluations of the persuasiveness of the evidence but had limited impact on the judgments of legal practitioners/trainees. When presented with compliant reports, we found that community participants regarded unknown reliability evidence as less reliable and less persuasive than high reliability evidence, suggesting disclosures helped reduce overvaluing of the evidence and create sensitivity to differences in evidence quality. These results suggest compliance with reporting recommendations does affect community impressions, while only minimally influencing legal impressions of forensic science evidence. The costs and/or benefits of this outcome require further examination.

Developmental changes in the effect of inversion: using a picture book to investigate face recognition

A novel child-oriented procedure was used to examine the face-recognition abilities of children as young as 2 years. A recognition task was embedded in a picture book containing a story about two boys and a witch. The story and the task were designed to be entertaining for children of a wide age range. In eight trials, the children were asked to pick out one of the boys from amongst eight distractors as quickly as possible. Response-time data to both upright and inverted conditions were analysed. The results revealed that children aged 6 years onwards showed the classic inversion effect. By contrast, the youngest children, aged 2 to 4 years, were faster at recognising the target face in the inverted condition than in the upright condition. Several possible explanations for this 'inverted inversion effect' are discussed.

Differences between fingers and hands in tapping ability: dissociation between speed and regularity

The mean inter-tap interval (ITI) and the coefficient of variation of the ITI (ITIVAR) were measured in all five fingers of the preferred and non-preferred hand in two experiments. Subjects were right- or left-handed, males or females in experiments I and right-handed female typists, pianists, or controls in experiment II. Lack of consistent difference between right- and left-handers, and between those with and without special manual skills, suggested that hand differences in tapping are not a consequence of differential practise between hands. ITI showed differences both between fingers and between hands, whereas ITIVAR only showed differences between fingers. Separate mechanisms are inferred, and it is suggested that differences between fingers are a function of differential peripheral motor control, whereas differences between hands are a consequence of cerebral dominance of control mechanisms, and a model is presented.