1
|
Vinson AJ, Cardinal H, Parsons C, Tennankore KK, Mainra R, Maru K, Treleaven D, Gill J. Disparities in Deceased Donor Kidney Offer Acceptance: A Survey of Canadian Transplant Nephrologists, General Surgeons and Urologists. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2023; 10:20543581231156855. [PMID: 36861114 PMCID: PMC9969426 DOI: 10.1177/20543581231156855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Significant variability in organ acceptance thresholds have been demonstrated across the United States, but data regarding the rate and rationale for kidney donor organ decline in Canada are lacking. Objective To examine decision making regarding deceased kidney donor acceptance and non-acceptance in a population of Canadian transplant professionals. Design A survey study of theoretical deceased donor kidney cases of increasing complexity. Setting Canadian transplant nephrologists, urologists, and surgeons making donor call decisions responding to an electronic survey between July 22 and October 4, 2022. Participants Invitations to participate were distributed to 179 Canadian transplant nephrologists, surgeons, and urologists through e-mail. Participants were identified by contacting each transplant program and requesting a list of physicians who take donor call. Measurements Survey respondents were asked whether they would accept or decline a given donor, assuming there was a suitable recipient. They were also asked to cite reasons for donor non-acceptance. Methods Donor scenario-specific acceptance rates (total acceptance divided by total number of respondents for a given scenario and overall) and reasons for decline were determined and presented as a percentage of the total cases declined. Results In all, 72 respondents from 7 provinces completed at least one question of the survey, with considerable variability between acceptance rates for centers; the most conservative center declined 60.9% of donor cases, whereas the most aggressive center declined only 28.1%, P-value < .001. There was an increased risk of non-acceptance with advancing age, donation after cardiac death, acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, and comorbidities. Limitations As with any survey, there is the potential for participation bias. In addition, this study examines donor characteristics in isolation, however, asks respondent to assume there is a suitable candidate available. In reality, whenever donor quality is considered, it should be considered in the context of the intended recipient. Conclusion In a survey of increasingly medically complex deceased kidney donor cases, there was significant variability in donor decline among Canadian transplant specialists. Given relatively high rates of donor decline and apparent heterogeneity in acceptance decisions, Canadian transplant specialists may benefit from additional education regarding the benefits achieved from even medically complex kidney donors for appropriate candidates relative to remaining on dialysis on the transplant waitlist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. J. Vinson
- Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax,
Canada,Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada,A. J. Vinson, Division of Nephrology,
Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Room 5081, 5th Floor Dickson
Building, Victoria General Hospital, 5820 University Ave, Halifax, NS B3H 1V8,
Canada.
| | - H. Cardinal
- Centre de recherche du Centre
hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - C. Parsons
- Organ and Tissue Donation and
Transplantation, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - K. K. Tennankore
- Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax,
Canada,Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - R. Mainra
- Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Regina, Canada
| | - K. Maru
- Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON,
Canada
| | - D. Treleaven
- Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - J. Gill
- Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hall VG, Solera JT, Al-Alahmadi G, Marinelli T, Cardinal H, Poirier C, Huard G, Prasad GR, De Serres SA, Isaac D, Mainra R, Lamarche C, Sapir-Pichhadze R, Gilmour S, Humar A, Kumar D. Gravité de la COVID-19 chez les receveurs d’une transplantation d’organe plein au Canada, 2020–2021 : étude de cohorte prospective multicentrique. CMAJ 2022; 194:E1578-E1586. [DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.220620-f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
|
3
|
Hall VG, Solera JT, Al-Alahmadi G, Marinelli T, Cardinal H, Poirier C, Huard G, Prasad GVR, De Serres SA, Isaac D, Mainra R, Lamarche C, Sapir-Pichhadze R, Gilmour S, Humar A, Kumar D. Severity of COVID-19 among solid organ transplant recipients in Canada, 2020–2021: a prospective, multicentre cohort study. CMAJ 2022; 194:E1155-E1163. [PMID: 36302101 PMCID: PMC9435532 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.220620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Severe COVID-19 appears to disproportionately affect people who are immunocompromised, although Canadian data in this context are limited. We sought to determine factors associated with severe COVID-19 outcomes among recipients of organ transplants across Canada. Methods: We performed a multicentre, prospective cohort study of all recipients of solid organ transplants from 9 transplant programs in Canada who received a diagnosis of COVID-19 from March 2020 to November 2021. Data were analyzed to determine risk factors for oxygen requirement and other metrics of disease severity. We compared outcomes by organ transplant type and examined changes in outcomes over time. We performed a multivariable analysis to determine variables associated with need for supplemental oxygen. Results: A total of 509 patients with solid organ transplants had confirmed COVID-19 during the study period. Risk factors associated with needing (n = 190), compared with not needing (n = 319), supplemental oxygen included age (median 62.6 yr, interquartile range [IQR] 52.5–69.5 yr v. median 55.5 yr, IQR 47.5–66.5; p < 0.001) and number of comorbidities (median 3, IQR 2–3 v. median 2, IQR 1–3; p < 0.001), as well as parameters associated with immunosuppression. Recipients of lung transplants (n = 48) were more likely to have severe disease with a high mortality rate (n = 15, 31.3%) compared with recipients of other organ transplants, including kidney (n = 48, 14.8%), heart (n = 1, 4.4%), liver (n = 9, 11.4%) and kidney–pancreas (n = 3, 12.0%) transplants (p = 0.02). Protective factors against needing supplemental oxygen included having had a liver transplant and receiving azathioprine. Having had 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine did not have an appreciable influence on oxygen requirement. Multivariable analysis showed that older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–1.07) and number of comorbidities (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.30–2.04), among other factors, were associated with the need for supplemental oxygen. Over time, disease severity did not decline significantly. Interpretation: Despite therapeutic advances and vaccination of recipients of solid organ transplants, evidence of increased severity of COVID-19, in particular among those with lung transplants, supports ongoing public health measures to protect these at-risk people, and early use of COVID-19 therapies for recipients of solid organ transplants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria G Hall
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Javier T Solera
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Ghadeer Al-Alahmadi
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Tina Marinelli
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Heloise Cardinal
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Charles Poirier
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Geneviève Huard
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - G V Ramesh Prasad
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Sacha A De Serres
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Debra Isaac
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Rahul Mainra
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Caroline Lamarche
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Susan Gilmour
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Atul Humar
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Deepali Kumar
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hall VG, Al-Alahmadi G, Solera JT, Marinelli T, Cardinal H, Prasad GVR, De Serres SA, Isaac D, Mainra R, Lamarche C, Sapir-Pichhadze R, Gilmour S, Matelski J, Humar A, Kumar D. Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Unvaccinated Compared With Vaccinated Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Propensity Matched Cohort Study. Transplantation 2022; 106:1622-1628. [PMID: 35502801 PMCID: PMC9311277 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at high risk for complications from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Vaccination may mitigate this risk; however, immunogenicity appears to be significantly impaired, with reports of increased risk of breakthrough infection. It is unknown if vaccine breakthrough infections are milder or as severe as infections in unvaccinated patients. METHODS We performed a multicenter matched cohort study between March 2020 and September 2021 to assess influence of COVID-19 vaccination on outcomes of COVID-19 infection. Treatment characteristics and disease severity outcomes were compared on the basis of vaccine status; breakthrough infections versus unvaccinated infections. Variable ratio propensity score matching based on age, sex, transplant type, and number of comorbidities, was used to develop the analytic cohort. Logistic regression was used to assess the influence of vaccination status on the selected outcomes. RESULTS From a cohort of 511 SOT patients with COVID-19, we matched 77 partially or fully vaccinated patients with 220 unvaccinated patients. Treatment characteristics including use of dexamethasone, remdesivir, and antibiotics did not differ. Vaccinated participants were more likely to receive tocilizumab, 15 of 77 (19.5%) versus 5 of 220 (2.3%), P < 0.001. Disease severity outcomes including oxygen requirement, mechanical ventilation, and mortality were similar among medically attended vaccine breakthroughs compared with unvaccinated patients. CONCLUSIONS SOT recipients who develop medically attended COVID-19 following 1- or 2-dose vaccination seem to have similar disease severity to unvaccinated patients who develop infection. This is consistent with the requirement that SOT recipients need 3 or more vaccine doses and emphasizes the importance of alternate strategies for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria G. Hall
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ghadeer Al-Alahmadi
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Javier T. Solera
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tina Marinelli
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Heloise Cardinal
- Department of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - G. V. Ramesh Prasad
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sacha A. De Serres
- Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Debra Isaac
- Division of Transplant Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Rahul Mainra
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, University Health Center of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Caroline Lamarche
- Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Susan Gilmour
- Stollery Children’s Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - John Matelski
- Biostatistics Research Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Atul Humar
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Deepali Kumar
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rosaasen C, Rosaasen N, Mainra R, Trachtenberg A, Ho J, Parsons C, Delaney S, Mansell H. Waitlisted and Transplant Patient Perspectives on Expanding Access to Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplant: A Qualitative Study. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2022; 9:20543581221100291. [PMID: 35615070 PMCID: PMC9125065 DOI: 10.1177/20543581221100291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: A concerning number of kidneys (eg, expanded donor criteria, extended criteria, or marginal kidneys) are discarded yearly while patients experience significant morbidity and mortality on the transplant waitlist. Novel solutions are needed to solve the shortage of kidneys available for transplant. Patient perceptions regarding the use of these less than ideal kidneys remain unexplored. Objective: To explore the perspectives of patients who have previously received a less than ideal kidney in the past and patients awaiting transplant who could potentially benefit from one. Design: Qualitative description study. Setting: 2 provinces in Canada participated (Saskatchewan and Manitoba). Patients: Patients with end-stage kidney disease who were awaiting kidney transplant and were either (a) aged 65 years and older, or (b) 55 years and older with other medical conditions (eg, diabetes). Methods: Criterion sampling was used to identify participants. Semi-structured, one-on-one interviews were conducted virtually, which explored perceived quality of life, perceptions of less than ideal kidneys, risk tolerance for accepting one, and educational needs to make such a choice. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Results: 15 interviews were conducted with usable data (n = 10 pretransplant; n = 5 posttransplant). Participants were a mean of 65.5 ± 8.8 years old. Four interrelated themes became prominent including (1) patient awareness and understanding of their situation or context, (2) a desire for information, (3) a desire for freedom from dialysis, and (4) trust. Subthemes of transparency, clarity, standardization, and autonomy were deemed important for participant education. The majority of pretransplant participants (n = 8/10) indicated that between 3 and 5 years off of dialysis would make the risk of accepting a less than ideal kidney feel worthwhile. Limitation: The study setting was limited to 2 Canadian provinces, which limits the generalizability. Furthermore, the participants were homogenous in demographics such as ethnicity. Conclusion: These findings indicate that patients are comfortable to accept a less than ideal kidney for transplant in situations where their autonomy is respected, they are provided clear, standardized, and transparent information, and when they trust their physician. These results will be used to inform the development of a new national registry for expanding access to deceased-donor kidney transplant. Trial Registration: Not registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Canute Rosaasen
- Johnson Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Nicola Rosaasen
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Rahul Mainra
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Aaron Trachtenberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Julie Ho
- Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Immunology, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | | | | | - Holly Mansell
- College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Knoll G, Campbell P, Chasse M, Fergusson D, Ramsay T, Karnabi P, Perl J, House A, Kim J, Johnston O, Mainra R, Houde I, Baran D, Treleaven D, Senecal L, Tibbles LA, Hébert MJ, White C, Karpinski M, Gill J. Immunosuppressant Medication Use in Patients with Kidney Allograft Failure: A Prospective Multi-Center Canadian Cohort Study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 33:1182-1192. [PMID: 35321940 PMCID: PMC9161795 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2021121642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Patients with kidney transplant failure have a high risk of hospitalization and death due to infection. The optimal use of immunosuppressants after transplant failure remains uncertain and clinical practice varies widely. Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients within 21 days of starting dialysis after transplant failure in 16 Canadian centers. Immunosuppressant medication use, death, hospitalized infection, rejection of the failed allograft, and panel reactive anti-HLA antibodies (PRA) were determined at 1, 3, 6 , and 12 months and bi-annually until death, repeat transplantation, or loss to follow-up. Results: The 269 study patients were followed for a median of 558 days. There were 33 deaths, 143 patients hospitalized for infection, and 21 rejections. Most patients (65%) continued immunosuppressants, 20% continued prednisone only, while 15% discontinued all immunosuppressants. In multivariable models, patients who continued immunosuppressants had a lower risk of death (HR =0.40, 95% CI, 0.17-0.93) and were not at increased risk of hospitalized infection (HR 1.81; 95% CI 0.82 to 4.0) compared to patients who discontinued all immunosuppressants or continued prednisone only. The mean class I and class II PRA increased from 11% to 27% and 25% to 47%, respectively, but did not differ by immunosuppressant use. Continuation of immunosuppressants was not protective of rejection of the failed allograft (HR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.22-2.94). Conclusions: Prolonged use of immunosuppressants greater than one year after transplant failure was not associated with a higher risk of death or hospitalized infection but was insufficient to prevent higher anti-HLA antibodies or rejection of the failed allograft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg Knoll
- G Knoll, Department of Medicine (Nephrology), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Patrica Campbell
- P Campbell, Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Michael Chasse
- M Chasse, Department of Medicine (Critical Care), University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Dean Fergusson
- D Fergusson, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Tim Ramsay
- T Ramsay, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Priscilla Karnabi
- P Karnabi, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Perl
- J Perl, Division of Nephrology, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew House
- A House, Department of Medicine (Nephrology), Western University, London, Canada
| | - Joe Kim
- J Kim, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - Olwyn Johnston
- O Johnston, Division of Nephrology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Rahul Mainra
- R Mainra, Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Isabel Houde
- I Houde , Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Laval University Faculty of Medicine, Quebec, Canada
| | - Dana Baran
- D Baran, Division of Nephrology and the Multi Organ Transplant Program, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Darin Treleaven
- D Treleaven, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Lynne Senecal
- L Senecal, Department of Nephrology, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Lee Ann Tibbles
- L Tibbles, ALTRA Transplant Program, Southern Alberta, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Marie-Josée Hébert
- M Hébert, Centre de recherche, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Christine White
- C White, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Martin Karpinski
- M Karpinski, Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - John Gill
- J Gill, Division of Nephrology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Weiss MJ, Hornby L, Foroutan F, Belga S, Bernier S, Bhat M, Buchan CA, Gagnon M, Hardman G, Ibrahim M, Luo C, Luong ML, Mainra R, Manara AR, Sapir-Pichhadze R, Shalhoub S, Shaver T, Singh JM, Srinathan S, Thomas I, Wilson LC, Wilson TM, Wright A, Mah A. Clinical Practice Guideline for Solid Organ Donation and Transplantation During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Transplant Direct 2021; 7:e755. [PMID: 34514110 PMCID: PMC8425831 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted health systems worldwide, including solid organ donation and transplantation programs. Guidance on how best to screen patients who are potential organ donors to minimize the risks of COVID-19 as well as how best to manage immunosuppression and reduce the risk of COVID-19 and manage infection in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr) is needed. METHODS Iterative literature searches were conducted, the last being January 2021, by a team of 3 information specialists. Stakeholders representing key groups undertook the systematic reviews and generation of recommendations using a rapid response approach that respected the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations frameworks. RESULTS The systematic reviews addressed multiple questions of interest. In this guidance document, we make 4 strong recommendations, 7 weak recommendations, 3 good practice statements, and 3 statements of "no recommendation." CONCLUSIONS SOTr and patients on the waitlist are populations of interest in the COVID-19 pandemic. Currently, there is a paucity of high-quality evidence to guide decisions around deceased donation assessments and the management of SOTr and waitlist patients. Inclusion of these populations in clinical trials of therapeutic interventions, including vaccine candidates, is essential to guide best practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Weiss
- Transplant Québec, Montréal, QC, Canada
- CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval, QC, Canada
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program (CDTRP), Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Laura Hornby
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program (CDTRP), Ottawa, ON, Canada
- System Development - Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Farid Foroutan
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sara Belga
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Mamatha Bhat
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Multiorgan Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - C Arianne Buchan
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Gagnon
- Division of Nephrology and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Gillian Hardman
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Ibrahim
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Kings College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cindy Luo
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Me-Linh Luong
- Department of Microbiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Rahul Mainra
- Division of Nephrology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
- St. Paul's Hospital, Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Alex R Manara
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze
- Division of Nephrology and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sarah Shalhoub
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Tina Shaver
- Southern Alberta Organ and Tissue Donation Program, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jeffrey M Singh
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, ON, Canada
- Trillium Gift of Life Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sujitha Srinathan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ian Thomas
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Lindsay C Wilson
- System Development - Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - T Murray Wilson
- Transplant Research Foundation of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Patient Partner, Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program
- The Alberta ORGANization Group, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Alissa Wright
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Allison Mah
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Habbous S, Barnieh L, Litchfield K, McKenzie S, Reich M, Lam NN, Mucsi I, Bugeja A, Yohanna S, Mainra R, Chong K, Fantus D, Prasad GVR, Dipchand C, Gill J, Getchell L, Garg AX. A RAND-Modified Delphi on Key Indicators to Measure the Efficiency of Living Kidney Donor Candidate Evaluations. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 15:1464-1473. [PMID: 32972951 PMCID: PMC7536753 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.03780320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Many patients, providers, and potential living donors perceive the living kidney donor evaluation process to be lengthy and difficult to navigate. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS We sought consensus on key terms and process and outcome indicators that can be used to measure how efficiently a transplant center evaluates persons interested in becoming a living kidney donor. Using a RAND-modified Delphi method, 77 participants (kidney transplant recipients or recipient candidates, living kidney donors or donor candidates, health care providers, and health care administrators) completed an online survey to define the terms and indicators. The definitions were then further refined during an in-person meeting with ten stakeholders. RESULTS We identified 16 process indicators (e.g., average time to evaluate a donor candidate), eight outcome indicators (e.g., annual number of preemptive living kidney donor transplants), and two measures that can be considered both process and outcome indicators (e.g., average number of times a candidate visited the transplant center for the evaluation). Transplant centers wishing to implement this set of indicators will require 22 unique data elements, all of which are either readily available or easily collected prospectively. CONCLUSIONS We identified a set of indicators through a consensus-based approach that may be used to monitor and improve the performance of a transplant center in how efficiently it evaluates persons interested in becoming a living kidney donor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Habbous
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada .,Quality, Measurement, and Evaluation, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lianne Barnieh
- Department of Nephrology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kenneth Litchfield
- Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease, Canada
| | - Susan McKenzie
- Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease, Canada
| | - Marian Reich
- Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease, Canada
| | - Ngan N Lam
- Division of Nephrology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Istvan Mucsi
- Kidney Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ann Bugeja
- Division of Nephrology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Seychelle Yohanna
- Division of Nephrology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rahul Mainra
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Saskatoon Health Region, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Kate Chong
- Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease, Canada
| | - Daniel Fantus
- Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - G V Ramesh Prasad
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christine Dipchand
- Division of Nephrology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Jagbir Gill
- Division of Nephrology, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Leah Getchell
- Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease, Canada
| | - Amit X Garg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Nephrology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lam NN, Dipchand C, Fortin MC, Foster BJ, Ghanekar A, Houde I, Kiberd B, Klarenbach S, Knoll GA, Landsberg D, Luke PP, Mainra R, Singh SK, Storsley L, Gill J. Canadian Society of Transplantation and Canadian Society of Nephrology Commentary on the 2017 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2020; 7:2054358120918457. [PMID: 32577294 PMCID: PMC7288834 DOI: 10.1177/2054358120918457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose of review: To review an international guideline on the evaluation and care of living
kidney donors and provide a commentary on the applicability of the
recommendations to the Canadian donor population. Sources of information: We reviewed the 2017 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)
Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney
Donors and compared this guideline to the Canadian 2014 Kidney Paired
Donation (KPD) Protocol for Participating Donors. Methods: A working group was formed consisting of members from the Canadian Society of
Transplantation and the Canadian Society of Nephrology. Members were
selected to have representation from across Canada and in various
subspecialties related to living kidney donation, including nephrology,
surgery, transplantation, pediatrics, and ethics. Key findings: Many of the KDIGO Guideline recommendations align with the KPD Protocol
recommendations. Canadian researchers have contributed to much of the
evidence on donor evaluation and outcomes used to support the KDIGO
Guideline recommendations. Limitations: Certain outcomes and risk assessment tools have yet to be validated in the
Canadian donor population. Implications: Living kidney donors should be counseled on the risks of postdonation
outcomes given recent evidence, understanding the limitations of the
literature with respect to its generalizability to the Canadian donor
population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ngan N Lam
- Division of Nephrology, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | | | - Bethany J Foster
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Anand Ghanekar
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Isabelle Houde
- Division of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Québec, Québec City, Canada
| | - Bryce Kiberd
- Division of Nephrology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | | - Greg A Knoll
- Division of Nephrology, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - David Landsberg
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Patrick P Luke
- Division of Urology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Rahul Mainra
- Division of Nephrology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Sunita K Singh
- Division of Nephrology, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Leroy Storsley
- Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Jagbir Gill
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ruderman I, Holt SG, Kirkland GS, Maslen S, Hawley CM, Oliver V, Krishnasamy R, Gray NA, Talaulikar GS, Nelson CL, Rajaram Y, Gock H, Au E, Elder GJ, Mainra R, Toussaint ND. Outcomes of cinacalcet withdrawal in Australian dialysis patients. Intern Med J 2019; 49:48-54. [PMID: 29992701 DOI: 10.1111/imj.14036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in chronic kidney disease is associated with cardiovascular and bone pathology. Measures to achieve parathyroid hormone (PTH) target values and control biochemical abnormalities associated with SHPT require complex therapies, and severe SHPT often requires parathyroidectomy or the calcimimetic cinacalcet. In Australia, cinacalcet was publicly funded for dialysis patients from 2009 to 2015 when funding was withdrawn following publication of the EVOLVE study, which resulted in most patients on cinacalcet ceasing therapy. We examined the clinical and biochemical outcomes associated with this change at Australian renal centres. AIM To assess changes to biochemical and clinical outcomes in dialysis patients following cessation of cinacalcet. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of dialysis patients who ceased cinacalcet after August 2015 in 11 Australian units. Clinical outcomes and changes in biochemical parameters were assessed over a 24- and 12-month period, respectively, from cessation of cinacalcet. RESULTS A total of 228 patients was included (17.7% of all dialysis patients from the units). Patients were aged 63 ± 15 years with 182 patients on haemodialysis and 46 on peritoneal dialysis. Over 24 months following cessation of cinacalcet, we observed 26 parathyroidectomies, 3 episodes of calciphylaxis, 8 fractures and 50 deaths. Eight patients recommenced cinacalcet, meeting criteria under a special access scheme. Biochemical changes from baseline to 12 months after cessation included increased levels of serum PTH from 54 (interquartile range 27-90) pmol/L to 85 (interquartile range 41-139) pmol/L (P < 0.0001), serum calcium from 2.3 ± 0.2 mmol/L to 2.5 ± 0.1 mmol/L (P < 0.0001) and alkaline phosphatase from 123 (92-176) IU/L to 143 (102-197) IU/L (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Significant increases in serum PTH, calcium and alkaline phosphatase occurred over a 12-month period following withdrawal of cinacalcet. Longer-term follow up will determine if these biochemical and therapeutic changes are associated with altered rates of parathyroidectomies and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Ruderman
- Department of Nephrology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine (RMH), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephen G Holt
- Department of Nephrology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine (RMH), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Geoffrey S Kirkland
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Sophie Maslen
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Carmel M Hawley
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Veronica Oliver
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rathika Krishnasamy
- Department of Nephrology, Sunshine Coast Hospital University Hospital, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nicholas A Gray
- Department of Nephrology, Sunshine Coast Hospital University Hospital, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Girish S Talaulikar
- Department of Nephrology, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Craig L Nelson
- Department of Nephrology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Western Health Chronic Disease Alliance, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yogeshwar Rajaram
- Department of Nephrology, St Vincent's Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hilton Gock
- Department of Nephrology, St Vincent's Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eric Au
- Department of Nephrology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Grahame J Elder
- Department of Nephrology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Osteoporosis and Bone Biology Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rahul Mainra
- Department of Nephrology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Nigel D Toussaint
- Department of Nephrology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine (RMH), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mainra R, Wong G, Pilmore H, Lim WH. Association of prevalent vascular disease with allograft failure and mortality in live-donor kidney transplant recipients - a retrospective cohort study. Transpl Int 2019; 32:1161-1172. [PMID: 31241216 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2018] [Revised: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Limited data exist regarding the impact of prevalent vascular disease after live-donor kidney transplantation. We aimed to determine the associations between the number of prevalent vascular diseases, allograft, and patient outcomes following live-donor transplantation. This cohort study used data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry. Rates between recipients of live-donor kidney transplants ± prevalent vascular disease prior to transplantation were calculated. The associations between vascular disease, allograft failure, and all-cause mortality were assessed using Cox regression modeling. Kaplan-Meier proportions were used to calculate all-cause mortality and death with a function graft stratified by vascular disease burden. Of 4742 live-donor recipients, 428 (9%) and 84 (2%) had prevalent vascular disease at 1 and ≥2 sites, respectively. Compared to recipients without vascular disease, the respective adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for patients with vascular disease at 1 and ≥2 sites were 1.78 (1.41-2.25) and 3.02 (2.03-4.50) for all-cause mortality; and 1.54 (1.26-1.88) and 2.28 (1.54-3.38) for allograft failure. All-cause mortality in recipients with vascular disease at 0, 1 and ≥2 sites was 0.028 (0.025, 0.031), 0.090 (0.073, 0.106) and 0.247 (0.196, 0.282) over the first 5-year post-transplant. There was an incremental association between the number of prevalent vascular disease sites and risk of allograft failure and all-cause mortality in live-donor kidney transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Mainra
- Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.,Division of Nephrology, Saskatchewan Transplant Program, St. Paul's Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Germaine Wong
- Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Helen Pilmore
- Department of Renal Medicine, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Medicine, Auckland University, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Wai H Lim
- Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mansell H, Rosaasen N, West-Thielke P, Wichart J, Daley C, Mainra R, Shoker A, Liu J, Blackburn D. Randomised controlled trial of a video intervention and behaviour contract to improve medication adherence after renal transplantation: the VECTOR study protocol. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e025495. [PMID: 30872550 PMCID: PMC6429879 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Non-adherence after kidney transplantation contributes to increased rejections, hospitalisations and healthcare expenditures. Although effective adherence interventions are sorely needed, increasing education and support to transplant recipients demands greater use of care providers' time and resources in a healthcare system that is stretched. The objective of this clinical trial is to determine the effectiveness of an electronically delivered video series and adherence behaviour contract on improving medication adherence to immunosuppressant medications. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A multicentre, parallel arm, randomised controlled trial will be conducted with four sites across North America (Saskatoon, Calgary, Halifax, Chicago). Adult patients will be randomised (1:1) to either the intervention (ie, home-based video education +behaviour contract plus usual care) or usual care alone. De novo transplant recipients will be enrolled prior to their hospital discharge and will be provided with electronic access to the video intervention (immediately) and adherence contract (1 month post-transplant). Follow-up electronic surveys will be provided at 3 and 12 months postenrolment. The primary outcome will be adherence at 12 months post-transplant, as measured by self-report Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive medications and immunosuppressant levels. Secondary outcomes include the difference in knowledge score between the intervention and control in groups (measured by the Kidney Transplant Understanding Tool); differences in self-efficacy (Generalised Self-efficacy Scale), Beliefs of Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ), quality of life (Short Form-12), patient satisfaction and cost utilisation. The study aims to recruit at least 200 participants across participating sites. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Saskatchewan Behavioural Ethics Committee (Beh 18-63), and all patients provide informed consent prior to participating. This educational intervention aims to improve information retention and self-efficacy, leading to improved medication adherence after kidney transplantation, at low cost, with little impact to existing healthcare personnel. If proven beneficial, delivery can be easily implemented into standard of care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03540121; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Mansell
- College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Nicola Rosaasen
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Patricia West-Thielke
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jenny Wichart
- Southern Alberta Transplant Program, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Christopher Daley
- Multi-organ Transplant Program of Atlantic Canada, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Rahul Mainra
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Ahmed Shoker
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Juxin Liu
- College of Arts and Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - David Blackburn
- College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rosaasen N, Mainra R, Kukha-Bryson A, Nhin V, Trivedi P, Shoker A, Wilson J, Padmanabh R, Mansell H. Development of a patient-centered video series to improve education before kidney transplantation. Patient Educ Couns 2018; 101:1624-1629. [PMID: 29729857 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2017] [Revised: 04/15/2018] [Accepted: 04/21/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inadequate patient knowledge about transplantation can result in low patient satisfaction and contribute to poor clinical outcomes. The purpose of this patient-oriented research project was to develop an educational intervention for patients awaiting kidney transplantation. METHODS An educational intervention was developed by patients and health care providers, experts in medication adherence, video education, motivational psychology, and cultural education. Project objectives were defined and content was guided by a series of studies conducted with stakeholders. A review process was undertaken with additional patients, external health care providers and ninth grade high school students and edits were applied accordingly. RESULTS A set of six educational videos, ranging in length from 3 to 24 min, was created to describe the transplant process. The videos are patient friendly in design, and incorporate animations to explain complex information to accommodate low health literacy, and patient testimonials align the content with principles of adult learning theory. Feedback from external patient reviews [n = 8], external care providers [n = 13] and students [n = 26], indicate that the mini-series is informative and useful. CONCLUSION Patient involvement significantly influenced the development of a video series about kidney transplantation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Patient engagement is integral for developing high quality and relevant educational interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rahul Mainra
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Ahmed Shoker
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Jay Wilson
- College of Education, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | | | - Holly Mansell
- College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rosaasen N, Taylor J, Blackburn D, Mainra R, Shoker A, Mansell H. Development and Validation of the Kidney Transplant Understanding Tool (K-TUT). Transplant Direct 2017; 3:e132. [PMID: 28361116 PMCID: PMC5367749 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000000647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2016] [Accepted: 12/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several educational interventions have been designed to improve patient knowledge before and after kidney transplantation. However, evaluation of such interventions has been difficult because validated instruments to measure knowledge-based outcomes in this population have not been developed. OBJECTIVE To create a tool to measure patient knowledge of kidney transplantation and to evaluate its validity. METHODS The Kidney Transplant Understanding Tool (K-TUT) was created using a stepwise iterative process. Experts in the field and transplant recipients were consulted to establish content validity. The K-TUT consists of 9 true/false and 13 multiple-choice questions, and scores are based on the number correct answers [YES/NO format] of 69 items. The questionnaire was piloted in a study that also measured health literacy (via the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy) in transplant candidates, whereas the main survey was mailed to transplant recipients. Test-retest was performed, and completed surveys were analyzed for internal consistency, construct validity, floor and ceiling effects, and reproducibility. RESULTS Surveys were offered to 106 pretransplant patients and 235 in the posttransplant period, and response rates were 38.7% (41/106) and 63.4% (149/235), respectively. The mean corrected scores were 53.1 ± 8.5 (77%) and 56.2 ± 6.3 (81%), respectively. Test-retest was performed over 20% of both cohorts and percent agreement ranged between 70% and 100% in the pretransplant group and 66% and 100% in the posttransplant group. Cronbach α ranged from 0.794 to 0.875 in all cohorts indicating favorable internal consistency. Increased health literacy in the pretransplant group was significantly associated with increased knowledge (r = 0.52; P < 0.001), suggestive of construct validity, and the absence of floor and ceiling effects was positive. The majority of transplant recipients (98/148, 67%) believed the questionnaire adequately assessed transplant knowledge, about a quarter (36/148, 24.3%) were "unsure," and 85% (126/148) agreed that no questions should be removed. CONCLUSIONS Although more study is warranted to further assess psychometric properties, the K-TUT appears to be a promising tool to measure transplant knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Rosaasen
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Saskatoon Health Region, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Jeff Taylor
- College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - David Blackburn
- College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Rahul Mainra
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Saskatoon Health Region, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Ahmed Shoker
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Saskatoon Health Region, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Holly Mansell
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Saskatoon Health Region, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
- College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Context: Poor knowledge about immunosuppressive (IS) medications remains a major problem for patients in the posttransplant setting. Therefore, more effective educational strategies in the pretransplant setting are being considered as a possible method to improve knowledge and readiness for the challenges of posttransplant care. However, the most effective/relevant content of a pretransplant educational program is yet to be determined. Objective: To identify pretransplant education topics from the posttransplant patient perspective. Design: A focus group meeting was conducted among 7 high-functioning, stable adult kidney transplant recipients recruited from the Saskatchewan Transplant Program. Demographic information including age, gender, occupation, background/ethnicity, and time since transplant were recorded. A moderator, assistant moderator, and research assistant facilitated the 90-minute focus group meeting using a predetermined semistructured interview guide. The session was audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Nvivo software was used to code the data and identify emerging themes exploring views of participants relating to the educational information required for pretransplant patients. Results: Patients were satisfied with the education they had received. Ideas were classified into the following major themes—patient satisfaction, transplant waitlist, surgery, medications, posttransplant complications, lifestyle and monitoring, knowledge acquisition, illusion of control, and life changes posttransplant. Knowledge gaps were identified in all areas of the transplantation process and were not exclusive to IS medications. Conclusion: Misconceptions regarding transplantation were identified by a group of high-functioning, stable adult recipients who were satisfied with their clinical care. Future educational strategies should aim to address the entire transplantation process and not be limited to medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Rosaasen
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Rahul Mainra
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Ahmed Shoker
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Jay Wilson
- College of Education, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - David Blackburn
- College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Holly Mansell
- College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jones J, Rosaasen N, Taylor J, Mainra R, Shoker A, Blackburn D, Wilson J, Mansell H. Health Literacy, Knowledge, and Patient Satisfaction Before Kidney Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2016; 48:2608-2614. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2016] [Accepted: 07/26/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
17
|
Benguzzi M, Mansell H, Hassan A, Elmoselhi H, Mainra R, Shoker A. Contribution of impaired renal function to cardiovascular risk prediction models in renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 2014; 28:1383-92. [PMID: 25251543 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/17/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Framingham risk score (FRS) and cardiovascular risk calculator for renal transplant recipients (CRCRTR-MACE) quantify cardiovascular risk in renal transplant recipients (RTR). In contrast to the FRS, the CRCRTR-MACE includes serum creatinine as a variable in the risk prediction equation. OBJECTIVE To determine the influence of impaired renal function on performances of the two equations. METHODS A chart review of 270 RTR transplanted from 1979 to 2012. High risk was defined at scores ≥20%. Standard statistical analyses included multivariate analysis (MVA), stepwise analysis, and odds ratio to estimate contributions of risk factors. RESULTS Mean transplant duration was 9.51 ± 6.65 yr. Mean eGFR was 59.19 ± 28.26 mL/min/1.73 m(2) . FRS and CRCRTR-MACE scores of least 20% were present in 9.3% and 24.8%, respectively, while 7.2% and 11.2% of RTR with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) were high risk, respectively. Mean age, blood pressure, TC:HDL ratio, smoking, and diabetes were evenly distributed in patients with varying eGFR. FRS scores remained similar at wide eGFR range (≤30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) -≥90 mL/min/1.73 m(2) ), while CRCRTR-MACE scores significantly increased as eGFR decreased. CONCLUSIONS CRCRTR-MACE identified more patients at high cardiovascular risk, even in those with more favorable renal function, suggesting a fundamental difference between the two calculators beyond renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mowad Benguzzi
- University of Saskatchewan, College of Medicine, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Elmoselhi H, Hossain MA, Khamis S, Mainra R, Hassan A, Shoker A. The Practical Implications of Using Estimated GFR as the Presumed Reference Variable to Estimate Transplant Chronic Kidney Disease. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014. [DOI: 10.4081/nr.2011.e2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
We determined the proportions of matched kidney transplant isotope GFRs (iGFRs) to the estimated functions (eGFRs) calculated from Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry (IDMS), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), and Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equations. One thousand four hundred and three iGFR/eGFR pairs on 390 kidney transplant patients were compared considering the iGFR or eGFR as the reference or test variable. Conformity of iGFR to CG estimates demonstrated the least bias of 1.3±18.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 (compared to 1.5±19.4 and - 2.2±19.2 for IDMS and CKDI-EPI, P<0.05) and CKD-EPI estimates the highest precision of 4.1±41.8 (compared to 11.3±43.9 for IDMS and 5.7±37.3 for CG; P<0.05). IDMS eGFR cut off less than 60 and less than 30 mL/min/1.73m2 were correctly matched by iGFR in 79.4% and 49.1% of the times, while CKD-EPI was matched by iGFR in 83.5% and 52.5%. CG was matched in 78.3% and 53.6%. IGFR cut off levels of less than 60, and less than 30 mL/min/1.73m2 were predicted by IDMS in 83.8% and 64.0% of the times. CKD-EPI was correct in 77.8% and 59.0% and CG in 82.5% and 41.6%, respectively. Transplant eGFR results obtained by CKD-EPI or CG are likely to be more precise and less biased than IDMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamdi Elmoselhi
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, St. Paul's Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, SK, Canada
| | - Mohammad Akhtar Hossain
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, St. Paul's Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, SK, Canada
| | - Said Khamis
- Faculty of Medicine, Menoufiya University, Shebin El Kom, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - Rahul Mainra
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, St. Paul's Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, SK, Canada
| | - Abubaker Hassan
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, St. Paul's Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, SK, Canada
| | - Ahmed Shoker
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, St. Paul's Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, SK, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mainra R, Xu Q, Chibbar R, Hassan A, Shoker A. Severe antibody-mediated rejection following IVIG infusion in a kidney transplant recipient with BK-virus nephropathy. Transpl Immunol 2013; 28:145-7. [PMID: 23685054 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2013.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2013] [Revised: 05/07/2013] [Accepted: 05/08/2013] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Intravenous immune-globulin (IVIG) use in renal transplantation has increased, with common uses including desensitization, treatment of antibody mediated rejection and adjunctive therapy for BK virus nephropathy. Although considered generally safe, potential side effects can occur in up to 23% of patients including acute kidney injury. We present a case of an unexpected cause of acute kidney injury in a renal transplant recipient following IVIG infusion. A 48-year-old nonsensitized female with end stage renal disease secondary to polycystic kidney disease received a deceased donor kidney transplant. The initial post-transplant period was unremarkable however at three years post-transplant the patient develops BK virus nephropathy. Despite a reduction in immunosuppression, graft function worsened and IVIG infusion was commenced. Immediately following the IVIG infusion, the patient develops anuric acute kidney injury necessitating hemodialysis. Renal transplant biopsy performed before and after the IVIG infusion revealed the de novo development of acute antibody mediated rejection and donor specific antibodies in the serum. Anti-HLA and donor-specific antibodies were also confirmed in a diluted sample of the IVIG preparation. We argue that the anti-HLA antibodies present in the IVIG caused an acute antibody mediated rejection in this previously nonsensitized female.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Mainra
- Division of Nephrology, Saskatchewan Transplant Program, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Xu Q, Mainra R, Chibbar R, Li J, Shoker A. 181-P. Hum Immunol 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2012.07.307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
21
|
Knoll GA, Blydt-Hansen TD, Campbell P, Cantarovich M, Cole E, Fairhead T, Gill JS, Gourishankar S, Hebert D, Hodsman A, House AA, Humar A, Karpinski M, Kim SJ, Mainra R, Prasad GVR. Canadian Society of Transplantation and Canadian Society of Nephrology commentary on the 2009 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Kidney Dis 2010; 56:219-46. [PMID: 20659623 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2010] [Accepted: 05/14/2010] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Greg A Knoll
- Division of Nephrology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Moist L, Sontrop JM, Gallo K, Mainra R, Cutler M, Freeman D, House AA. Effect of N-acetylcysteine on serum creatinine and kidney function: results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2010; 56:643-50. [PMID: 20541301 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2009] [Accepted: 03/24/2010] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence for a protective effect of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on acute and chronic kidney disease is equivocal, and controversy persists about whether NAC affects creatinine level independently of actual kidney function. Study objectives are to investigate whether NAC affects serum creatinine level independently of alterations in other measures of kidney function. STUDY DESIGN Double-blind randomized controlled trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS Patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease (n = 60), Canada, 2007-2008. INTERVENTION Participants were randomly allocated to receive 4 doses of oral NAC (each 1,200 mg) or placebo, administered at 12-hour intervals. OUTCOME The primary outcome was change in serum creatinine level between baseline and 4 hours after the last treatment dose. In addition, changes in other parameters of kidney function were measured between baseline and 4, 24, or 48 hours after the last treatment dose. MEASUREMENTS Serum creatinine, cystatin C, 24-hour urine protein and creatinine excretion, and creatinine clearance. RESULTS 60 patients, mean age of 70 years, 75% men, 50% had diabetes, with mean creatinine clearance of 43.7 ± 18.8 (SD) mL/min were enrolled. Between baseline and 4 hours posttreatment, serum creatinine level decreased by 0.044 ± 0.15 mg/dL in the NAC group and 0.040 ± 0.18 mg/dL in the placebo group (95% CI for difference, -0.09 to 0.08; P = 0.9). No significant differences between groups were observed for change in serum creatinine, cystatin C, urine protein, urine creatinine, or creatinine clearance values at any time. LIMITATIONS Blinding patients to orally administered liquid NAC is difficult and it is possible that patients receiving NAC were not sufficiently blinded. Effects of NAC beyond 48 hours of treatment were not evaluated. CONCLUSIONS In this randomized controlled trial, NAC had no short-term effect on creatinine level and did not decrease urine protein excretion within 48 hours of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Moist
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mainra R, Elder GJ. Individualized therapy to prevent bone mineral density loss after kidney and kidney-pancreas transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 5:117-24. [PMID: 19965527 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.03770609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Most patients who undergo kidney or kidney-pancreas transplantation have renal osteodystrophy, and immediately after transplantation bone mineral density (BMD) commonly falls. Together, these abnormalities predispose to an increased fracture incidence. Bisphosphonate or calcitriol therapy can preserve BMD after transplantation, but although bisphosphonates may be more effective, they pose potential risks for adynamic bone. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS A total of 153 kidney (61%) and kidney-pancreas (39%) transplant recipients were allocated to bisphosphonate (62%) or calcitriol (38%) therapy using an algorithm that incorporated BMD, prevalent vertebral fracture, biomarkers of bone turnover, and risk factor assessment. Patients received cholecalciferol and calcium as appropriate and were followed for 12 mo. RESULTS Patients who were treated with bisphosphonates had lower BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck and longer time on dialysis. Age and gender were similar between the groups. At 12 mo, bisphosphonate-treated patients had significant BMD increases at the lumber spine and femoral neck and a negative trend at the wrist. Patients who were allocated to calcitriol, who were assessed to have lower baseline fracture risk, had no significant change in BMD at any site. At 1 yr, mean levels of bone turnover marker and intact parathyroid hormone normalized in both groups. Incident fracture rates did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS With targeted treatment, BMD levels were stable or improved and bone turnover markers normalized. This algorithm provides a guide to targeting therapy after transplantation that avoids BMD loss and may reduce suppression of bone turnover.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Mainra
- Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Urquhart BL, Freeman DJ, Cutler MJ, Mainra R, Spence JD, House AA. Mesna for treatment of hyperhomocysteinemia in hemodialysis patients: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3:1041-7. [PMID: 18337551 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.04771107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Increased plasma total homocysteine is a graded, independent risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. More than 90% of patients with end-stage renal disease have hyperhomocysteinemia despite vitamin supplementation. It was shown in previous studies that a single intravenous dose of mesna 5 mg/kg caused a drop in plasma total homocysteine that was significantly lower than predialysis levels 2 d after dosing. It was hypothesized 5 mg/kg intravenous mesna administered thrice weekly, before dialysis, for 8 wk would cause a significant decrease in plasma total homocysteine compared with placebo. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS Patients with end-stage renal disease were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous mesna 5 mg/kg or placebo thrice weekly before dialysis. Predialysis plasma total homocysteine concentrations at weeks 4 and 8 were compared between groups by paired t test. RESULTS Mean total homocysteine at 8 wk in the placebo group was 24.9 micromol/L compared with 24.3 micromol/L in the mesna group (n = 22 [11 pairs]; mean difference 0.63). Interim analysis at 4 wk also showed no significant difference between mesna and placebo (n = 32 [16 pairs]; placebo 26.3 micromol/L, mesna 24.5 micromol/L; mean difference 1.88). Multivariable adjustments for baseline characteristics did not alter the analysis. Plasma mesna seemed to reach steady-state concentrations by 4 wk. CONCLUSIONS It is concluded that 5 mg/kg mesna does not lower plasma total homocysteine in hemodialysis patients and that larger dosages may be required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley L Urquhart
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is commonly administered to high-risk individuals to attenuate the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy in spite of the debate regarding its efficacy. In several studies serum creatinine decreased after exposure to NAC and contrast dye. The mechanism by which NAC attenuates the decline in renal function is not known. Studies in subjects with normal renal function suggest NAC may have an effect on tubular secretion. AIM The aim of this study was to determine the effect of NAC on renal function, measured by serum creatinine and Cystatin C, in patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease. METHOD Serum creatinine and Cystatin C were measured prior to, 4, 24 and 48 h after the administration of 600 mg oral NAC in 30 patients. The protocol was repeated with the addition of 1200 mg oral cimetidine administered 3 h before NAC. RESULTS Serum creatinine was not significantly different from baseline (186 +/- 65 micromol/L) to 4 h (185 +/- 62 micromol/L), 24 h (187 +/- 64 micromol/L) or 48 h (184 +/- 61 micromol/L) post NAC, nor were Cystatin C levels. Co-administration of cimetidine resulted in a significant rise in serum creatinine with no change in Cystatin C levels. CONCLUSION This study failed to detect a change in serum creatinine or Cystatin C after a single dose of NAC in participants with stage 3 chronic kidney disease. Further randomized trials of multiple doses and longer follow up are needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Mainra
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, and London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mainra R, Mulay A, Bell R, Karpinski J, Hoar S, Knoll G, Robertson S, Wang D. Sirolimus use and de novo minimal change nephropathy following renal transplantation. Transplantation 2006; 80:1816. [PMID: 16378080 DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000181385.68835.a0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
27
|
Abstract
Several studies have reported improved outcomes with daily hemodialysis (DHD), but the strength of this evidence has not been evaluated. The published evidence on DHD was synthesized and its quality rated to inform need and sample size calculations for a randomized trial. Citations were identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE using validated search strategies. Dialysis journals that were not indexed and bibliographies of relevant articles were hand-searched. Two authors reviewed all citations. Articles that reported original data on five or more adults who were receiving DHD (1.5 to 3 h, 5 to 7 d/wk) for > or = 3 mo were included. Twenty-five articles reporting 14 unique populations with 268 patients (five to 72 per study) met inclusion criteria. Of the 14 cohorts, 13 were studied with an observational design, 10 were studied prospectively, and four had parallel control groups. Mean age ranged form 41 to 64 yr, mean time on dialysis was 2 to 11 yr, 0 to 28% of patients had diabetes, > 90% had arteriovenous fistulae, and > 50% were dialyzed at home. Most data were described at < or = 12 mo of follow-up. Outcomes included quality of life, cardiovascular disease, erythropoiesis, nutritional status, hospitalizations, and vascular access failures. Reporting was too heterogeneous to allow pooling of data. Ten of 11 studies suggested improvements in blood pressure; findings for other outcomes varied. Discontinuation of DHD occurred in 0 to 57% in-center and 0 to 15% home patients. Studies of DHD are limited by small sample size, nonideal control groups, selection and dropout biases, and paucity of data on potential risks. Randomized trials with adequate statistical power are required to establish the efficacy and the safety of DHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita S Suri
- Division of Nephrology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cujec B, Mainra R, Johnson DH. Prevention of recurrent cerebral ischemic events in patients with patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic strokes or transient ischemic attacks. Can J Cardiol 1999; 15:57-64. [PMID: 10024860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is found in up to 50% of patients less than 55 years of age who have had a stroke. Therapeutic options include no therapy, antiplatelet therapy, warfarin and surgical closure of the PFO. OBJECTIVES To determine the relative and attributable risks of PFO for recurrent cerebral ischemic events in young patients with stroke or transient ischemic attacks. The predictors of recurrent cerebral ischemic events and the effects of different therapies on recurrence rates were sought. DESIGN Follow-up of a retrospective cohort of patients with cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attacks identified from an echocardiography database. SETTING University-based regional neurology referral centre. PATIENTS Consecutive group of 90 patients less than 60 years of age who underwent transesophageal echocardiography following a cryptogenic transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke (cerebrovascular accident [CVA]) between 1991 and 1997. INTERVENTIONS Structured telephone interviews and chart reviews. RESULTS Fifty-two patients had a PFO, and 38 patients did not have a PFO. During a mean follow-up of 46 months, 19 recurrent cerebral ischemic events (12 TIA and seven CVA) occurred in 14 patients with PFO, and eight recurrent events (three TIA and five CVA) occurred in six patients without PFO. The recurrence rates were 12% and 5%/patient/year in the PFO and control groups, respectively, for a crude recurrence rate ratio of 2.39 (95% CI 1.01 to 6.32, P < 0.03). The attributable risk of PFO in recurrent neurological events was 7%/patient/year. In a Cox regression model, predictors of recurrent neurological events were presence of PFO (hazard ratio 5.27, 95% CI 1.58 to 17.6, P < 0.007), history of migraine (hazard ratio 4.54, 95% CI 1.11 to 18.52, P < 0.035), hypertension requiring therapy (hazard ratio 3.5, 95% CI 1.33 to 9.01, P < 0.01), and antiplatelet or no therapy instead of warfarin therapy (hazard ratio 2.88, 95% CI 1.11 to 8.7, P < 0.04). Fourteen patients underwent surgical closure of PFO; there were no neurological recurrences during a mean follow-up of 43 months (crude incidence rate difference 12%/patient/year, 95% CI 6.6 to 17.9, P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Patients with PFO had a significantly higher rate of recurrent cerebral ischemic events than those without PFO. Surgical PFO closure prevented any recurrences during a mean follow-up of 43 months. Warfarin was better than antiplatelet therapy or no therapy in preventing recurrences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Cujec
- Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cujec B, Mainra R, Johnson D, Voll C. Surgical closure of patent foramen ovale is the preferred treatment to prevent recurrent cerebral ischemic events in young patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998. [DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)80823-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
30
|
Costain WJ, Mainra R, Desautels M, Sulakhe PV. Expressed α 1-adrenoceptors in adult rat brown adipocytes are primarily of α 1Asubtype. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1996. [DOI: 10.1139/y96-006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
31
|
Costain WJ, Mainra R, Desautels M, Sulakhe PV. Expressed alpha 1-adrenoceptors in adult rat brown adipocytes are primarily of alpha 1A subtype. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1996; 74:234-40. [PMID: 8773401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The main objective of this study was to characterize the alpha 1-adrenoceptors expressed in adult rat brown adipocytes. For this purpose, membrane fractions were prepared from brown adipose tissue as well as from isolated brown adipocytes. The following are major findings: (i) BAT membranes were considerably enriched in alpha 1-adrenoceptors (specific [3H]prazosin binding, Bmax, 79.49 +/- 16.77 fmol/mg protein; KD, 0.24 +/- 0.04 nM); (ii) among the cells that comprise brown adipose tissue, brown adipocytes were enriched in alpha 1-adrenoceptors; (iii) > 95% of total alpha 1-adrenoceptors were resistant to inactivation by 20 microM chloroethylclonidine, which readily and essentially completely inactivated alpha 1B-adrenoceptors in rat liver membranes; (iv) brown adipose tissue membrane alpha 1-adrenoceptors showed high affinity towards 5-methyl urapidil (KD 7.23 +/- 2.49 nM) and WB 4101 (KD 0.66 +/- 0.30 nM) and low affinity towards BMY 7378 (KD 0.34 +/- 0.03 microM); essentially similar affinities for these drugs were seen for membranes prepared from brown adipocytes; and (v) EBDA/LIGAND analysis of 5-methyl urapidil, WB 4101, and BMY 7378 competition curves revealed the presence of a single binding site for these drugs. Recent work has documented that 5-methyl urapidil and WB 4101 interact with high affinity with alpha 1A-adrenoceptors, while BMY 7378 interacts with high affinity with alpha 1D-adrenoceptors. Taken together, these findings are consistent with the view that alpha 1-adrenoceptors expressed in adult rat BAT are mainly of the alpha 1A subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W J Costain
- Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Costain W, Mainra R, Desautels M, Sulakhe P. E×pressed α 1-adrenoceptors in adult rat brown adipocytes are primarily of α 1A subtype. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1996. [DOI: 10.1139/cjpp-74-3-234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|