Anatomical Gynecological Anomalies in Girls Born with Anorectal Malformations: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 128 Patients

STUDY OBJECTIVE

In girls born with an anorectal malformation (ARM), anatomical gynecological anomalies (GA) may be present and might need treatment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to provide an overview of GA in girls born with ARM in our cohort. Additionally, diagnostic timing and methods for GA were assessed.

METHODS

A retrospective mono-center study was performed from January 2000 to December 2022. All patients assigned female at birth were eligible for inclusion. GA were classified according to ESHRE/ESGE classification. Outcomes were the number of girls with GA with subsequent screening methods, factors associated with GA, and GA requiring treatment. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the association between baseline characteristics and the presence of GA.

RESULTS

In total, 128 girls were included, of whom 30 (24.1%) had additional GA, with vaginal anomalies being present most often (n = 17). Fifty-six patients (43.8%) underwent full screening, and this number improved over time (37.7% before 2018 vs 72.7% after 2018; P = .003). Thirteen of 30 patients (43.3%) required surgical treatment for their GA, without the occurrence of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Additional GA were present in almost a quarter of the girls born with an ARM, with vaginal anomalies most often identified. Despite GA being most often found in patients with cloacal malformations, these anomalies were also identified in patients with other ARM types. Surgical treatment was required in almost half of the girls with GA. Therefore, this study emphasizes the importance of screening for GA in patients with an ARM, regardless of the ARM type.

Systematic review on management of high-output enterostomy in children: An urgent call for evidence

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND

High-output stoma is one of the most common major morbidities in young children with an enterostomy that could lead to intestinal failure. Management of high-output enterostomy in children is mostly based on personal experience. This systematic review aims to clarify the evidence-based therapeutic approach of high-output enterostomy in children.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using Pubmed, Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane Library to identify studies published until March 20, 2023, following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. The study population comprised children (i.e., age <18 years) with high-output enterostomy (i.e., jejuno-, ileo-, and/or colostomy), regardless of underlying aetiology. Interventions comprised any (non)pharmacological and/or surgical treatment. Interventions were compared with each other, placebos, and/or no interventions. Primary outcome was reduction of enterostomy output. Secondary outcomes were morbidity, mortality, quality of life, associated healthcare costs, and adverse events.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 4278 original articles of which 366 were screened on full text, revealing that none of the articles met the inclusion criteria.

CONCLUSION

This first systematic review on management of high-output enterostomy in children revealed that any evidence on the primary and secondary outcomes is lacking. There is an urgent need for evidence on conservative treatment strategies including fluid restrictions, dietary advices, oral rehydration solution, chyme re-infusion, and pharmacological and surgical treatments of high-output enterostomy in children, aiming to reduce the risk for short- and long-term complications. Till more evidence is available, a systematic and multidisciplinary step-up approach is needed. Therefore, a therapeutic work-up is proposed that could guide the care.

Different Analgesia Techniques for Postoperative Pain in Children Undergoing Abdominal Surgery for Intractable Constipation: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Single Tertiary Children's Hospital

Functional constipation in the pediatric population is a prevalent issue that is usually well managed. However, in rare cases, conservative treatment fails, and surgical intervention is necessary. This retrospective cohort study aimed to describe and compare different perioperative analgesic techniques in children undergoing major abdominal surgery for intractable constipation. Conducted between 2011 and 2021, this study enrolled patients under 18 years old who underwent initial major abdominal surgery for intractable constipation (i.e., creation of ostomy or subtotal colectomy). Patients were categorized according to the perioperative analgesic technique (i.e., systemic, neuraxial, or truncal block). Of 65 patients, 46 (70.8%) were female, and the median age was 13.5 [8.8-16.1] years during initial major abdominal surgery. Systemic analgesia was used in 43 (66.2%), neuraxial in 17 (26.2%), and truncal blocks in 5 (7.7%) of the surgeries. Patients with neuraxial analgesia reported less postoperative pain (median [interquartile range] numeric rating scale (NRS) 2.0 [0-4.0]), compared to systemic analgesia (5.0 [2.0-7.0], p < 0.001) and to truncal blocks (5.0 [3.0-6.5], p < 0.001). In this preliminary investigation, neuraxial analgesia appears to be the most effective approach to reducing acute postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing major abdominal surgery for intractable functional constipation. However, well-designed studies are warranted.

Enhanced Th17 responses in the appendix of children with complex compared to simple appendicitis are associated with microbial dysbiosis

Introduction

Appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal surgery in children. The clinical course of appendicitis ranges from simple to complex appendicitis. The mechanisms underlying the heterogeneity of appendicitis in children remain largely unclear. Dysregulated T cell responses play an important role in several inflammatory diseases of the intestine, but the extend of T cell dysregulation in appendicitis in children is less well known.

Methods

To characterize appendiceal T cells in simple and complex appendicitis we performed in-depth immunophenotyping of appendiceal-derived T cells by flow cytometry and correlated this to appendiceal-derived microbiota analyses of the same patient.

Results

Appendix samples of twenty children with appendicitis (n = 8 simple, n = 12 complex) were collected. T cells in complex appendicitis displayed an increased differentiated phenotype compared to simple appendicitis, including a loss of both CD27 and CD28 by CD4+ T cells and to a lesser extent by CD8+ T cells. Frequencies of phenotypic tissue-resident memory CD69+CD4+ T cells and CD69+CD8+ T cells were decreased in children with complex compared to simple appendicitis, indicating disruption of local tissue-resident immune responses. In line with the increased differentiated phenotype, cytokine production of in particular IL-17A by CD4+ T cells was increased in children with complex compared to simple appendicitis. Furthermore, frequencies of IL-17A+ CD4+ T cells correlated with a dysregulation of the appendiceal microbiota in children with complex appendicitis.

Conclusion

In conclusion, disruption of local T cell responses, and enhanced pro-inflammatory Th17 responses correlating to changes in the appendiceal microbiota were observed in children with complex compared to simple appendicitis. Further studies are needed to decipher the role of a dysregulated network of microbiota and Th17 cells in the development of complex appendicitis in children.

Missed Proximal Tracheoesophageal Fistula (TEF) in a Neonate with Type D Esophageal Atresia

We present the case of a patient with the rare type D esophageal atresia (EA), diagnosed after correction of an EA initially diagnosed as type C. Routine postoperative contrast esophagogram showed a missed proximal tracheoesophageal fistula. This case report illustrates the potential difficulties to diagnose type D EA.

Erratum: Missed Proximal Tracheoesophageal Fistula (TEF) in a Neonate with Type D Esophageal Atresia

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/a-2227-6389.].

Development of an international core outcome set for treatment trials in paediatric inguinal hernia: protocol for a three-phase study including a systematic review and Delphi survey

INTRODUCTION

In children, open inguinal hernia repair has been the gold standard for treatment, but with recent technical advancements in laparoscopy, laparoscopic hernia repair is gaining popularity. Despite available results from comparative studies, there is still no consensus regarding the superiority of open versus laparoscopic treatment strategy. An important reason for lack of consensus is the large heterogeneity in the trials' reported outcomes and outcome definitions, which limits comparisons between studies and precludes conclusions regarding the superiority of treatment strategies. The development and implementation of a core outcome set (COS) is a solution for this heterogeneity in the selection, measurement and reporting of trial outcome measures across studies. Currently, there is no COS for the treatment of paediatric inguinal hernia.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The aim of this project is to reach international consensus on a minimal set of outcomes that should be measured and reported in all future clinical trials investigating inguinal hernia repair in children. The development process comprises three phases. First, we identify outcome domains associated with paediatric inguinal hernia repair from a patient perspective and through a systematic review of the literature using EMBASE, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library databases. Second, we conduct a three-step Delphi study to identify and prioritise 'core' outcomes for the eventual minimal set. In the third phase, an expert meeting is held to establish the final COS and develop implementation strategies with participants from all stakeholder groups: healthcare professionals, parents and patients' representatives. The final COS will be reported in accordance with the COS-Standards for Reporting statement.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The medical research ethics committee of the Amsterdam UMC confirmed that the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) does not apply to this study and that full approval by the committee is not required. Electronic informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Results will be presented in peer-reviewed academic journals and at relevant conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021281422.

Trends in Simple and Complex Appendicitis in Children and the Potential Correlation to Common Viral Pathogens-A Retrospective Cohort Study between 2010 and 2019 in The Netherlands

The aim of this study was to evaluate the annual, seasonal and monthly trends in children with simple and complex appendicitis and their correlation to common viral pathogens in the Netherlands. A consecutive multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed between 2010 and 2019 including children (<18 years) surgically treated for appendicitis. The primary outcome was the distribution of children with simple and complex appendicitis per year, season and month. Relevant seasonal variation was defined as ≥5%. The secondary outcome was a positive correlation of the number of patients with simple and complex appendicitis to common viral pathogens (data anonymously provided by the Dutch Working Group on Clinical Virology from the Dutch Society for Clinical Microbiology (NVMM)). In total, 896 patients were included: N = 524 (58%) patients with simple and N = 372 (42%) with complex appendicitis. Of the children aged 0-5 years, 81% had complex appendicitis, versus 38% in 6-18 years (p < 0.001). An overall decline was demonstrated for both simple and complex appendicitis between 2010 and 2019. No seasonal variation was found for simple appendicitis. For complex appendicitis, the highest number of patients was found in spring, and lowest in summer (N = 372, spring 28.2 ± 5.1% versus summer 21.0 ± 5.8%, p = 0.011), but the variance was regarded as not relevant (<5% from baseline). A positive correlation was found between complex appendicitis with Adenovirus 40.41 (R = 0.356, 95%CI 0.045-0.604, p = 0.026) and simple appendicitis with Adenovirus NON 40.41 (R = 0.332, 95%CI 0.019-0.586, p = 0.039), but these correlations did not remain significant after a Bonferroni correction (p < 0.003). In conclusion, we found no relevant seasonal variation for simple or complex appendicitis, nor positive correlation with common viral pathogens.

Transitional Care for Patients with Congenital Colorectal Diseases: An EUPSA Network Office, ERNICA, and eUROGEN Joint Venture

BACKGROUND

Transition of care (TOC; from childhood into adulthood) of patients with anorectal malformations (ARM) and Hirschsprung disease (HD) ensures continuation of care for these patients. The aim of this international study was to assess the current status of TOC and adult care (AC) programs for patients with ARM and HD.

METHODS

A survey was developed by members of EUPSA, ERN eUROGEN, and ERNICA, including patient representatives (ePAGs), comprising of four domains: general information, general questions about transition to adulthood, and disease-specific questions regarding TOC and AC programs. Recruitment of centres was done by the ERNs and EUPSA, using mailing lists and social media accounts. Only descriptive statistics were reported.

RESULTS

In total, 82 centres from 21 different countries entered the survey. Approximately half of them were ERN network members. Seventy-two centres (87.8%) had a self-reported area of expertise for both ARM and HD. Specific TOC programs were installed in 44% of the centres and AC programs in 31% of these centres. When comparing centres, wide variation was observed in the content of the programs.

CONCLUSION

Despite the awareness of the importance of TOC and AC programs, these programs were installed in less than 50% of the participating centres. Various transition and AC programs were applied, with considerable heterogeneity in implementation, content and responsible caregivers involved. Sharing best practice examples and taking into account local and National Health Care Programs might lead to a better continuation of care in the future.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Potential benefits of routine cystoscopy and vaginoscopy prior to reconstructive surgery in patients with an anorectal malformation

PURPOSE

First, to assess the number of patients with anorectal malformations (ARM) in whom additional urological and/or gynecological anomalies were identified through routine screening with cysto- or vaginoscopy prior to reconstructive surgery. Second, to assess potential procedure-related complications.

METHODS

Retrospective mono-center cohort study, including all ARM patients born between January 2019 and December 2022. Routine screening consisted of cystoscopy for male patients, with the addition of vaginoscopy for female patients. Chi-square was used to compare the screening percentages over time.

RESULTS

In total, 38 patients were included, of whom 27 (71.1%) underwent cystoscopy ± vaginoscopy, without the occurrence of complications. Nine of 13 females (69.2%) underwent cysto- and vaginoscopy and 18 of 25 males (72.0%) underwent a cystoscopy. The percentage of patients that underwent these procedures improved over the 2 time periods (50.0% in 2019-2020 vs 90.0% in 2021-2022, p = 0.011). In 15 of 27 patients (55.6%) that underwent cystoscopy ± vaginoscopy, additional anomalies were found that were not identified through physical examination or US-kidney.

CONCLUSIONS

In 56% of the patients that underwent cysto- ± vaginoscopy, additional anomalies were identified that were not with imaging studies or physical examination. This study emphasizes the potential benefit of routine cysto- and vaginoscopy in the diagnostic work-up of children with ARM.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Outcomes after Surgical Treatment for Rectal Atresia in Children: Is There a Preferred Approach? A Systematic Review

Rectal atresia (RA) affects only 1 to 2% of all children with anorectal malformations. No consensus on optimal treatment strategy is yet achieved. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to summarize all surgical interventions for RA and outcomes described in the current literature. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library on January 24, 2022. All studies describing treatment for RA in children (< 18 years) were included. Operation technique and postoperative complications were listed. Only descriptive analysis was anticipated. Quality of the studies was assessed using Johanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for case reports and series. The search yielded 6,716 studies of which, after duplicate removal, 4,028 were excluded based on title and abstract screening. After full-text assessment, 22 of 90 studies were included, yielding 70 patients. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) and pull-through were most performed (43/70 and 18/70 patients, respectively). Four patients experienced postoperative complications: anal stenosis (n = 1), anastomotic stenosis (n = 2), and death due to a pulmonary complication (n = 1). In the low-quality literature available, most patients with RA are treated with PSARP or pull-through technique. A low complication rate of both has been described but follow-up was often not mentioned. Larger well-designed studies should be performed to determine optimal treatment strategy for children with RA. This study reflects level of evidence V.

Appendicitis and its associated mortality and morbidity in infants up to 3 months of age: A systematic review

Background and Aims

Although appendicitis is rare in young infants, the reported mortality is high. Primary aim of this systematic review was to provide updated insights in the mortality and morbidity (postoperative complications, Clavien-Dindo grades I-IV) of appendicitis in infants ≤3 months of age. Secondary aims comprised the evaluation of patient characteristics, diagnostic work-up, treatment strategies, comorbidity, and factors associated with poor outcome.

Methods

This systematic review was reported according to the PRISMA statement with a search performed in Pubmed, Embase and Web of Science (up to September 5th 2022). Original articles (published in English ≥1980) reporting on infants ≤3 months of age with appendicitis were included. Both patients with abdominal appendicitis and herniated appendicitis (such as Amyand's hernia) were considered. Data were provided descriptively.

Results

In total, 131 articles were included encompassing 242 cases after identification of 4294 records. Overall, 184 (76%) of the 242 patients had abdominal and 58 (24%) had herniated appendicitis. Two-hundred (83%) of the patients were newborns (≤28 days) and 42 (17%) were infants between 29 days and ≤3 months of age. Either immediate, or after initial conservative treatment, 236 (98%) patients underwent surgical treatment. Some 168 (69%) patients had perforated appendicitis. Mortality was reported in 20 (8%) patients and morbidity in an additional 18 (8%). All fatal cases had abdominal appendicitis and fatal outcome was relatively more often reported in newborns, term patients, patients with relevant comorbidity, nonperforated appendicitis and those presented from home.

Conclusion

Mortality was reported in 20 (8%) infants ≤3 months of age and additional morbidity in 18 (8%). All patients with fatal outcome had abdominal appendicitis. Several patient characteristics were relatively more often reported in infants with poor outcome and adequate monitoring, early recognition and prompt treatment may favour the outcome.

The Importance of Screening for Additional Anomalies in Patients with Anorectal Malformations: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

In children with anorectal malformations (ARM), additional anomalies can occur within the VACTERL-association. Routine screening is of great importance for early identification and potential treatment. However, uniformity in screening protocols is lacking and only small cohorts have been described in literature. The aim of this study was to assess and describe a unique large cohort of ARM patients who underwent VACTERL screening in the neonatal period.

METHODS

A retrospective mono-center cohort study was performed. Included were all neonates born between January 2000 and December 2020 who were diagnosed with ARM and screened for additional anomalies. Full screening consisted of x-ray and ultrasound of the spine, cardiac and renal ultrasound, and physical examination for limb deformities, esophageal atresia, and ARM. Criteria for VACTERL-classification were predefined according to the EUROCAT-definitions.

RESULTS

In total, 216 patients were included, of whom 167 (77.3%) underwent full VACTERL-screening (66% in 2000-2006 vs. 82% in 2007-2013 vs. 86% in 2014-2020). Median age at follow-up was 7.0 years (IQR 3.0-12.8). In 103/167 patients (61.7%), additional anomalies were identified. Some 35/216 patients (16.2%) fulfilled the criteria of a form of VACTERL-association. In 37/216 patients (17.1%), a genetic cause or syndrome was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of ARM patients underwent full screening to detect additional anomalies (77%), which improved over time to 86%. Yet, approximately a quarter of patients was not screened, with the potential of missing important additional anomalies that might have severe consequences in the future. Forms of VACTERL-association or genetic causes were found in 16% and 17% respectively. This study emphasizes the importance of routine screening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Rectal atresia and rectal stenosis: the ARM-Net Consortium experience

PURPOSE

To assess the number, characteristics, and functional short-, and midterm outcomes of patients with rectal atresia (RA) and stenosis (RS) in the ARM-Net registry.

METHODS

Patients with RA/RS were retrieved from the ARM-Net registry. Patient characteristics, associated anomalies, surgical approach, and functional bowel outcomes at 1 and 5-year follow-up were assessed.

RESULTS

The ARM-Net registry included 2619 patients, of whom 36 (1.3%) had RA/RS. Median age at follow-up was 7.0 years (IQR 2.3-9.0). Twenty-three patients (63.9%, RA n = 13, RS n = 10) had additional anomalies. PSARP was the most performed reconstructive surgery for both RA (n = 9) and RS (n = 6) patients. At 1-year follow-up, 11/24 patients with known data (45.8%, RA n = 5, RS n = 6) were constipated, of whom 9 required stool softeners and/or laxatives. At 5-year follow-up, 8/9 patients with known data (88.9%, RA n = 4, RS n = 4) were constipated, all requiring laxatives and/or enema.

CONCLUSION

RA and RS are rare types of ARM, representing 1.3% of patients in the ARM-Net registry. Additional anomalies were present in majority of patients. Different surgical approaches were performed as reconstructive treatment, with constipation occurring in 46% and 89% of the patients at 1 and 5-year follow-up. However, accurate evaluation of long-term functional outcomes remains challenging.

Children with an Anorectal Malformation Going to Primary School: The Parent's Perspective

BACKGROUND

Continence problems occur often in children with anorectal malformations (ARM). The aim of this study was to evaluate parental experiences with toilet facilities at Dutch primary schools and their experience with how schools deal with ARM children.

METHODS

This survey was developed in collaboration with the national patient advocacy group (PAG). Recruitment for participation was conducted by the PAG (email listing and social media) and one expertise center for ARM. Participants were parents of school-attending ARM children aged 3 to 12 years.

RESULTS

Sixty-one participants (31.9%) responded to the survey. The median age of the children was 7.0 years (IQR 5.0-9.0). Schools were often located in a village (63.9%) and encompassed 100-500 children (77.0%). In total, 14 parents (23.0%) experienced difficulties in finding a primary school. Experiences with the school were described as solely positive (37.7%), solely negative (9.8%), positive and negative (34.4%), and neither positive nor negative (16.4%). Regarding school toilet facilities, 65.6% of the toilets were reported clean and 78.7% were easily accessible.

CONCLUSIONS

About 25% of parents reported difficulties in enrolling their children into primary school, and 45% reported negative experiences. This highlights the need for improved guidance and the optimization of education in schools when dealing with ARM children.

Additional Anomalies in Children with Gastroschisis and Omphalocele: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Congenital abdominal wall defects might be associated with other anomalies, such as atresia in gastroschisis and cardiac anomalies in omphalocele patients. However, in the current literature, an overview of these additional anomalies and potential patient-specific risk factors is missing. Therefore, we aimed to assess the prevalence of associated anomalies and their patient-specific risk factors in patients with gastroschisis and omphalocele.

METHODS

A mono-center retrospective cohort study between 1997 and 2023 was performed. Outcomes were the presence of any additional anomalies. Risk factors were analyzed via logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 122 patients were included, of whom 82 (67.2%) had gastroschisis, and 40 (32.8%) had omphalocele. Additional anomalies were identified in 26 gastroschisis patients (31.7%) and in 27 omphalocele patients (67.5%). In patients with gastroschisis, intestinal anomalies were most identified (n = 13, 15.9%), whereas, in patients with omphalocele, cardiac anomalies were most identified (n = 15, 37.5%). Logistic regression showed that cardiac anomalies were associated with complex gastroschisis (OR: 8.5; CI-95%: 1.4-49.5).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with gastroschisis and omphalocele, intestinal and cardiac anomalies were most identified, respectively. Cardiac anomalies were found to be a risk factor for patients with complex gastroschisis. Therefore, regardless of the type of gastroschisis and/or omphalocele, postnatal cardiac screening remains important.

Cardiac anomalies in children with congenital duodenal obstruction: a systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiac anomalies occur frequently in patients with congenital duodenal obstruction (DO). However, the exact occurrence and the type of associated anomalies remain unknown. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to aggregate the available literatures on cardiac anomalies in patients with DO.

METHODS

In July 2022, a search was performed in PubMed and Embase.com. Studies describing cardiac anomalies in patients with congenital DO were considered eligible. Primary outcome was the pooled percentage of cardiac anomalies in patients with DO. Secondary outcomes were the pooled percentages of the types of cardiac anomalies, type of DO, and trisomy 21. A meta-analysis was performed to pool the reported data.

RESULTS

In total, 99 publications met our eligibility data, representing 6725 patients. The pooled percentage of cardiac anomalies was 29% (95% CI 0.26-0.32). The most common cardiac anomalies were persistent foramen ovale 35% (95% CI 0.20-0.54), ventricular septal defect 33% (95% CI 0.24-0.43), and atrial septal defect 33% (95% CI 0.26-0.41). The most prevalent type of obstruction was type 3 (complete atresias), with a pooled percentage of 54% (95% CI 0.48-0.60). The pooled percentage of Trisomy 21 in patients with DO was 28% (95% CI 0.26-0.31).

CONCLUSION

This review shows cardiac anomalies are found in one-third of the patients with DO regardless of the presence of trisomy 21. Therefore, we recommend that patients with DO should receive preoperative cardiac screening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Spinal cord anomalies in children with anorectal malformations: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

First, to assess the number of spinal cord anomalies (SCA), specifically tethered spinal cord (TSC) in patients with anorectal malformations (ARM), identified with spinal cord imaging (i.e. spinal cord US and/or MRI). Second, to report outcomes after TSC treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective mono-center study was performed. All ARM patients born between January 2000 and December 2021 were included. Screening for SCA consisted of spinal cord US and/or MRI. Radiology reports were scored on presence of SCA. Data were presented with descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

In total, 254 patients were eligible for inclusion, of whom 234 (92.1%) underwent spinal cord imaging. In total, 52 (22.2%) patients had a SCA, diagnosed with US (n = 20, 38.5%), MRI (n = 10, 19.2%), or both US and MRI (n = 22, 42.3%), of whom 12 (23.5%) with simple, 27 (52.7%) intermediate, and 12 (23.5%) complex ARM types. TSC was identified in 19 patients (8.1%), of whom 4 (21.1%) underwent uncomplicated neurosurgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

SCA were present in 22% of ARM patients both in simple, as well as more complex ARM types. TSC was present in 19 patients with SCA, of whom 4 underwent uncomplicated neurosurgical intervention. Therefore, screening for SCA seems to be important for all ARM patients, regardless of ARM type.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Routine contrast enema prior to stoma reversal seems only required following treatment for necrotizing enterocolitis: An evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the contrast enema

INTRODUCTION

Contrast enemas are often made prior to stoma reversal in order to detect distal intestinal strictures distal of the stoma. If untreated these strictures can cause obstruction which might necessitate redo-surgery. However, the value of contrast enemas is unclear. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the contrast enema's diagnostic accuracy in detecting strictures in children with a stoma.

METHODS

Young children (≤3 years) treated with a stoma between 1998 and 2018 were retrospectively included. The STARD criteria were followed. Patients treated for anorectal malformations and those that died before stoma reversal were excluded. Surgical identification of strictures during reversal or redo-surgery within three months was used as gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and area under the curve (AUC) reflected diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

In 224 included children, strictures were found during reversal in 10% of which 95% in patients treated for necrotizing enterocolitis. Contrast enema was performed in 68% of all patients and detected 92% of the strictures. In the overall cohort, the sensitivity was 100%, specificity 98%, PPV 88% and NPV 100% whilst the AUC was 0.98. In patients treated for NEC, the sensitivity was 100%, specificity 97%, PPV 88% and NPV 100% whilst the AUC was 0.98.

CONCLUSION

Strictures prior to stoma reversal seem to be mainly identified in patients treated for NEC and not in other diseases necessitating a stoma. Moreover, the contrast enema shows excellent diagnostic accuracy in detecting these strictures. For this reason we advise to only perform contrast enemas in patients treated for NEC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Outcome after vaginal delivery of women with a previous medical history of surgically corrected anorectal malformations: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Discussion remains on how to advise women with a past medical history of surgically corrected anorectal malformations (ARMs) regarding vaginal delivery. The aim of this review is to evaluate and review the reported obstetrical complications and outcomes after vaginal delivery for these women.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search was performed from inception up to 25 July 2022 in PubMed, Embase.com and Clarivate Analytics/Web of Science Core Collection, with backward citation tracking.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA/APPRAISAL

All articles reported on the outcomes of interest in women with a past medical history of surgically corrected anorectal malformation and had a vaginal delivery were included with the exception of editorial comments or invitational commentaries. Screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment was done by two authors independently with a third and fourth reviewer in case of disagreement. Tool for Quality assessment depended on the type of article. As low quality evidence was expected no meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Only five of the 2377 articles screened were eligible for inclusion with a total of 13 attempted vaginal deliveries in eight women. In three patients complications were reported: failed vaginal delivery requiring urgent cesarean section in two patients, and vaginal tearing in one patient.

CONCLUSION

High quality evidence regarding outcomes and complications after vaginal delivery in women with a history of surgically corrected anorectal malformation is lacking. Therefore, based upon this systematic review no formal recommendation can be formulated regarding its safety. Future studies are essential to address this problem.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRD42020201390. Date: 28-07-2020s.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y feeding jejunostomy as a long-term solution for severe feeding problems in children

Enteral feeding is a common problem in children with gastric emptying disorders. Traditional feeding methods in these patients often show a high rate of complications and maintenance issues. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y feeding jejunostomy (LRFJ) has been described in a few patients as a minimal invasive option for enteral access in these children. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of the LRFJ procedure in our tertiary referral center. We conducted a retrospective case-series including all patients, aged 0-18 years old, that underwent a LFRJ procedure between August 2011 and December 2020 for the indication of oral feeding intolerance due to delayed gastric emptying. Outcomes evaluated were complications (short and long term) and parenteral satisfaction. In total, 12 children were identified that underwent LRFJ for the indication of oral feeding intolerance due to delayed gastric emptying. A total of 16 complications were noted in 8/12 patients (67%). Severity classified by Clavien-Dindo were grade I (n = 13), grade II (n = 1), and grade IIIB (n = 2). In 11/12 patients, parents were satisfied with the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Although minor complications after LRFJ are common in our patients, this technique is a safe solution in patients with gastric emptying disorders leading to a definitive method of enteral feeding and high parenteral satisfaction.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Traditional tube feeding in children (duodenal, PEG-J-tubes) with severe delayed gastric emptying can be challenging with a high rate of complications and maintenance issues. • Open loop jejunostomy and Roux-en-Y jejunostomy are alternative, permanent methods of feeding but either invasive or are accompanied by severe complications. Little is known in the literature about laparoscopic Roux-en-Y feeding jejunostomy.

WHAT IS NEW

• Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y feeding jejunostomy is a permanent, safe and minimal invasive alternative option for enteral feeding in children with severe delayed gastric emptying..

[Deviating from guideline-recommended diagnostic work-up in general practice: examples involving high-sensitivity troponin and CRP testing]

While clinical guidelines are essential for decision-making based on the latest evidence, they are not all-encompassing for any given patient or context. As such, deviating from guideline recommendations is common practice and can be attributed to contextual, ethical, clinical, or scientific factors. In the setting of diagnostic testing deviating from recommended diagnostic work-up may result in both over- and under-testing. In this Clinical Lesson we discuss two scenarios in primary care, one involving high-sensitivity troponin testing in a patient with episodes of chest discomfort, and the other involving CRP testing in a pediatric patient with acute-onset abdominal pain.

Fundoplication in children with esophageal atresia: preoperative workup and outcome

Up to 45% of esophageal atresia (EA) patients undergo fundoplication during childhood. Their esophageal dysmotility may predispose to worse fundoplication outcomes compared with patients without EA. We therefore compared fundoplication outcomes and symptoms pre- and post-fundoplication in EA patients with matched patients without EA. A retrospective review of patients with- and without EA who underwent a fundoplication was performed between 2006 and 2017. Therapeutic success was defined as complete sustained resolution of symptoms that were the reason to perform fundoplication. Fundoplication indications of 39 EA patients (49% male; median age 1.1 [0.1-17.0] yrs) and 39 non-EA patients (46% male; median age 1.3 [0.3-17.0] yrs) included respiratory symptoms, brief resolved unexplained events, typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease, recurrent strictures and respiratory problems. Post-fundoplication, therapeutic success was achieved in 5 (13%) EA patients versus 29 (74%) non-EA patients (P<0.001). Despite therapeutic success, all 5 (13%) EA patients developed postoperative sustained symptoms/complications versus 12 (31%) non-EA patients. Eleven (28%) EA patients versus 3 (8%) non-EA patients did not achieve any therapeutic success (P=0.036). Remaining patients achieved partial therapeutic success. EA patients suffered significantly more often from postoperative sustained dysphagia (41% vs. 13%; P=0.039), gagging (33% vs. 23%; P<0.001) and bloating (40% vs. 17%; P=0.022). Fundoplication outcomes in EA patients are poor and EA patients are more susceptible to post-fundoplication sustained symptoms and complications compared with patients without EA. The decision to perform fundoplication in EA patients with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease needs to be made with caution after thorough multidisciplinary evaluation.

Identification of the optimal treatment strategy for complex appendicitis in the paediatric population: a protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study (CAPP study)

INTRODUCTION

In daily practice large heterogeneity in the treatment of children with complex appendicitis exists. Complex appendicitis can be divided into two subtypes; complex appendicitis with and without appendiceal mass and/or abscess. As complex appendicitis is associated with high morbidity and costs, identification of the optimal treatment strategy is essential. In this article, we present the study protocol for the CAPP (Complex Appendicitis in the Pediatric Population) study.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This nation-wide, multi-centre, comparative, non-randomised prospective cohort study includes all children <18 years old with a preoperative suspicion of complex appendicitis, which is based on imaging confirmed acute appendicitis and predefined criteria regarding the severity of appendicitis. Eligible patients are recruited in more than 30 hospitals. Open appendectomy will be compared with laparoscopic appendectomy for children without appendiceal mass and/or abscess and initial non-operative treatment (ie, intravenous antibiotics with or without percutaneous drainage) to direct appendectomy for children with appendiceal mass and/or abscess. Based on historical data supplied by the participating hospitals and an inclusion period of 2 years and 9 months, a sample size of 1308 patients is aimed. Primary outcome is the proportion of patients experiencing any complication at 3 months follow-up. Reported complications will be assessed by an independent adjudication committee. Secondary outcomes include, but are not limited to, quality of life, and (in)direct costs. To adjust for baseline differences and selection bias, outcomes will be compared after propensity score analysis (inverse probability weighting and stratification).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Medical Ethics Review Committee of the Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, declared that the Medical Research involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) did not apply to this study. Therefore, no official approval was required by national law. Study results will be presented in peer-reviewed scientific journals and at (inter)national conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT04755179; NL9371.

Predictive scoring systems to differentiate between simple and complex appendicitis in children (PRE-APP study)

BACKGROUND

Several clinical prediction rules have been developed for preoperative differentiation between simple and complex appendicitis in children, as potential treatment strategies differ. This study aimed to externally validate applicable clinical prediction rules that could be used to differentiate between simple and complex appendicitis in children.

METHODS

Potential clinical prediction rules were identified by a scoping review of the literature. Clinical prediction rules applicable in our daily practice were subsequently externally validated in a multicenter historical cohort consisting of 1 tertiary center and 1 large teaching hospital. All children (<18 years old) with histopathologically confirmed acute appendicitis between 2013 and 2020 were included. Test results of clinical prediction rules were compared to the gold standard of either simple or complex appendicitis consisting of predefined perioperative and histopathological criteria. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were determined for the selected clinical prediction rules. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve >0.7 were considered acceptable and potentially useful.

RESULTS

In total, 31 clinical prediction rules were identified, of which 12 could be evaluated in our cohort consisting of 550 children. The main reason to exclude clinical prediction rules was the use of variables that were not routinely measured in our cohort. In our cohort, 208/550 (38%) were diagnosed with complex appendicitis according to the gold standard. Clinical prediction rules with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve >0.7 were: Gorter (0.81), Bogaard (0.79), Bröker (0.79), Graham (0.77), Hansson (0.76), BADCF (0.76), and Eddama (0.75).

CONCLUSION

In this study, clinical prediction rules consisting of a combination of clinical and objective variables had the highest discriminative ability. External validation showed that 7 clinical prediction rules were potentially useful. Integration of these clinical prediction rules in daily practice is proposed to guide decision making regarding treatment strategies.

The potential of rectal swabs to differentiate simple and complex appendicitis in children with a microbiota-based test

Currently, accurate biomarkers differentiating simple (phlegmonous) from complex (gangrenous and/or perforated) appendicitis in children are lacking. However, both types may potentially require different treatment strategies, and the search for diagnostic modalities remains warranted. Previously, we demonstrated a distinct microbiota (both an increased bacterial diversity and abundance) in the appendix of children with complex compared to simple appendicitis. From the same cohort of patients we have collected 35 rectal swabs under general anesthesia prior to appendectomy and microbiota analysis was performed by IS-pro, a 16S-23S rDNA-based clinical microbiota profiling technique. Using the obtained IS-profiles, we performed cluster analyses (UPGMA), comparison of diversity (Shannon Diversity Index) and intensity (abundance in relative fluorescence units) on phylum level, and comparison on species level of bacteria between simple and complex appendicitis. Regarding these analyses, we observed no clear differences between simple and complex appendicitis. However, increased similarity of the microbial composition of the appendix and rectal swab was found within children with complex compared to simple appendicitis. Furthermore, PLS-DA regression analysis provided clear visual differentiation between simple and complex appendicitis, but the diagnostic power was low (highest AUC 0.65).   Conclusion: Microbiota analysis of rectal swabs may be viable to differentiate between simple and complex appendicitis prior to surgery as a supervised classification model allowed for discrimination of both types. However, the current diagnostic power was low and further validation studies are needed to assess the value of this method. What is Known: • Simple and complex appendicitis in children may require different treatment strategies, but accurate preoperative biomarkers are lacking. • Clear differentiation can be made between both types in children based upon the microbial composition in the appendix. What is New: • Increased similarity was found between the microbial composition of the appendix and rectal swab within children with complex compared to simple appendicitis. • Using a supervised classification model rectal swabs may be viable to discriminate between simple and complex appendicitis, but the diagnostic power was low.

The Management of Post-appendectomy Abscess in Children; A Historical Cohort Study and Update of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have shown that specific cases of post-appendectomy abscess (PAA) in children could be treated conservatively. However, due to the lack of high-quality evidence, choice of treatment still depends on preferences of the treating surgeon, leading to heterogeneity in clinical practice. Therefore, we aimed to provide an update of recent literature on the management of PAA in children and subsequently evaluate the outcomes of a large multicenter cohort of children treated for PAA.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in Pubmed and Embase, selecting all randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and case series published from 2014 and onward and reporting on children (<18 years) treated for a PAA. Subsequently, a historical cohort study was performed, including all children (<18 years) treated for a radiologically confirmed PAA between 2014 and 2021 in a tertiary referral center and two large peripheral centers. Medical charts were reviewed to compare non-invasive (i.e., antibiotics) and invasive (i.e., drainage procedures) treatment strategies. Primary outcome was the success rate of treatment, defined as no need for further interventions related to PAA or its complications.

RESULTS

The search yielded 1,991 articles, of which three were included. Treatment success ranged between 69-88% and 56-100% for non-invasive and invasive strategies, respectively. Our multicenter cohort study included 70 children with a PAA, of which 29 (41%) were treated non-invasively and 41 (59%) invasively. In the non-invasive group, treatment was effective in 21 patients (72%) compared to 25 patients (61%) in the invasive group. Non-invasive treatment was effective in 100% of unifocal small (<3 cm) and 80% of unifocal medium size PAA (3-6 cm), but not effective for multiple abscesses.

CONCLUSION

Non-invasive treatment of especially unifocal small and medium size (<6 cm) PAA in children seems to be safe and effective. Based on these results, a standardized treatment protocol was developed. Prospective validation of this step-up approach-based treatment protocol is recommended.

Non-operative treatment of children with simple appendicitis: long-term follow-up (5 years) in a prospective cohort study

Long-term results after non-operative treatment for children with simple appendicitis seem promising, possibly avoiding appendicectomy in 70 per cent of children after a median follow-up of 5 years. The need for delayed appendicectomy more than 2 years after the initial treatment is rare (0–5 per cent) and no complications occurred past 1 year, including children who underwent delayed appendicectomy.

Diagnostic accuracy of abdominal ultrasound to detect pathology that needs surgical exploration in children with umbilical discharge

BACKGROUND

Umbilical discharge is common in children and mostly attributed to infection or granuloma. However, an underlying congenital abnormality warranting surgery might also be present. Ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice to diagnose the presence of a congenital abnormality. The aim of this study is to investigate diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasound to detect pathology requiring surgical excision.

METHODS

All patients ≤18 years with umbilical discharge from January 2008 to September 2019 were retrospectively included. Diagnostic accuracy, i.e., sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-), were calculated.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients were included and 56 were operated. The ultrasound was false positive in 10 patients and false negative in 13 patients. The sensitivity of ultrasound was 71.1% (95% CI 55.7-83.6), specificity 72.2% (54.8-85.8), PPV 76.2% (64.7-84.8), NPV 66.7% (54.8-76.8), LR+ 2.6 (1.5-4.5) and LR- 0.40 (0.2-0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for detecting underlying congenital abnormalities warranting surgery for umbilical discharge in the pediatric population is low, even with experienced pediatric radiologists. Therefore, the role of the ultrasound in the diagnostic workup and value in clinical decision making is limited.

TYPE OF STUDY

Study of diagnostic test.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Treatment strategies for anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome in children: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) is a frequently overlooked cause of chronic abdominal pain in children. Currently, both nonsurgical and surgical treatment options are available to treat this disease. The objective was to give insight into the success rate of different treatment strategies for children with ACNES, and provide treatment recommendations for physicians based on the published evidence.

METHOD

A literature search of PubMed, Embase.com and the Wiley/Cochrane Library was conducted for studies published up to 25 February 2020. Randomized controlled trials, prospective or retrospective cohort studies, meta-analyses and literature reviews describing the outcome of different treatment strategies for children (<18 years old) with ACNES with a follow-up duration of at least four weeks were included.

RESULTS

Six studies, involving 224 patients, were included with an overall quality reported to be between fair and poor. Treatment success of local injections with an anesthetic agent into the trigger point ranged from 38% to 87% with a follow-up ranging from 4 weeks to 39 months. In addition, treatment success of anterior neurectomy ranged from 86% to 100%, with a follow-up duration ranging from 4 weeks to 36 months.

CONCLUSION

A step-up treatment strategy should be applied when treating pediatric patients with ACNES. This strategy starts with an injection with a local anesthetic agent, reserving surgery (anterior neurectomy) as a viable option in case of persistent pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

International Core Outcome Set for Acute Simple Appendicitis in Children: Results of A Systematic Review, Delphi Study, and Focus Groups with Young People

OBJECTIVE:

To develop an international Core Outcome Set (COS), a minimal collection of outcomes that should be measured and reported in all future clinical trials evaluating treatments of acute simple appendicitis in children.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

A previous systematic review identified 115 outcomes in 60 trials and systematic reviews evaluating treatments for children with appendicitis, suggesting the need for a COS.

METHODS

The development process consisted of four phases: (1) an updated systematic review identifying all previously reported outcomes, (2) a two-stage international Delphi study in which parents with their children and surgeons rated these outcomes for inclusion in the COS, (3) focus groups with young people to identify missing outcomes, and (4) international expert meetings to ratify the final COS.

RESULTS

The systematic review identified 129 outcomes which were mapped to 43 unique outcome terms for the Delphi survey. The first-round included 137 parents (eight countries) and 245 surgeons (10 countries), the second-round response rates were 61% and 85% respectively, with ten outcomes emerging with consensus. After two young peoples' focus groups, two additional outcomes were added to the final COS (12): mortality, bowel obstruction, intra-abdominal abscess, recurrent appendicitis, complicated appendicitis, return to baseline health, readmission, reoperation, unplanned appendectomy, adverse events related to treatment, major and minor complications.

CONCLUSION

An evidence-informed COS based on international consensus, including patients and parents has been developed. This COS is recommended for all future studies evaluating treatment of simple appendicitis in children, to reduce heterogeneity between studies and facilitate data synthesis and evidence-based decision-making.

Histopathologic examination of resected nerves from children with anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome: Clues for pathogenesis?

BACKGROUND

Anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) has been described as a possible cause for chronic pain in the pediatric population. However, the exact pathophysiology of ACNES is unknown. It may be caused by compression or traction of cutaneous nerve branches of intercostal nerves, or it may be the result of an infection. Therefore, we present histopathological evidence to determine the pathophysiology of ACNES.

METHODS

A total of seven pediatric patients underwent a neurectomy for ACNES. All specimens were sent for histopathological evaluation, including immunohistochemical staining, to evaluate if there were any signs of infection, inflammation or compression.

RESULTS

Seven out of seven (100%) histopathological specimens showed non-specific nerve degeneration. Immunohistochemical evaluation showed there were several CD68-positive macrophages present in the specimens. Four out of seven (57%) specimens showed the presence of a few CD3-positive T-cells, however, this was not suggestive for inflammation or infection.

CONCLUSION

Our study supports the hypothesis that ACNES is caused by compression of the nerves rather than inflammation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

[Revised guideline for acute appendicitis. Amendments to diagnostics and treatment]

Recently, the revised guideline 'Guideline for diagnostics and treatment of acute appendicitis' was published by the Dutch Surgical Society. A patient with limited clinical symptoms and low suspicion of appendicitis can be assessed again at a later time, during which ultrasound diagnostics can be repeated. Following an inconclusive ultrasound scan in children who possibly have appendicitis, it is no longer recommended to perform diagnostic laparoscopy; rather, MRI diagnostics are indicated. In young adults with possible appendicitis, in whom a diagnosis cannot be established using ultrasound, the advice is to use MRI diagnostics instead of CT imaging; this particularly applies to women of child-bearing age. For patients with appendicitis an appendectomy remains the recommended treatment, although one can consider treating adults with suspected simple appendicitis with antibiotics alone. It is important that this decision is made in consultation with the patient. Laparoscopic appendectomy reduces the number of wound infections and admission length, and is therefore usually preferred over open method appendectomy. If a patient with appendicitis is 24-28 weeks pregnant,consultation with a specialist centre is indicated regarding the obstetric management and possibly referral.

[Acute appendicitis: treatment in accordance with new guideline]

In this clinical lesson we present two patient cases. A 66-year-old female patient with a clinical, biochemical and radiological suspicion of complex appendicitis. The patient undergoes an appendectomy and post-operative recovery is beset with complications. The other case involves a 24-year-old male patient with suspected simple appendicitis. He is successfully treated with antibiotics and without surgery. By using these patients as examples, we discuss the revised clinical guideline for diagnosing and treating acute appendicitis. Besides that, we also discuss the differentiation between simple and complex appendicitis and how this can influence the treatment plan.

Ruling out Appendicitis in Children: Can We Use Clinical Prediction Rules?

PURPOSE

To identify available clinical prediction rules (CPRs) and investigate their ability to rule out appendicitis in children presenting with abdominal pain at the emergency department, and accordingly select CPRs that could be useful in a future prospective cohort study.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted to identify available CPRs. These were subsequently tested in a historical cohort from a general teaching hospital, comprising all children (< 18 years) that visited the emergency department between 2012 and 2015 with abdominal pain. Data were extracted from the electronic patient files and scores of the identified CPRs were calculated for each patient. The negative likelihood ratios were only calculated for those CPRs that could be calculated for at least 50% of patients.

RESULTS

Twelve CPRs were tested in a cohort of 291 patients, of whom 87 (29.9%) suffered from acute appendicitis. The Ohmann score, Alvarado score, modified Alvarado score, Pediatric Appendicitis score, Low-Risk Appendicitis Rule Refinement, Christian score, and Low Risk Appendicitis Rule had a negative likelihood ratio < 0.1. The Modified Alvarado Scoring System and Lintula score had a negative likelihood ratio > 0.1. Three CPRs were excluded because the score could not be calculated for at least 50% of patients.

CONCLUSION

This study identified seven CPRs that could be used in a prospective cohort study to compare their ability to rule out appendicitis in children and investigate if clinical monitoring and re-evaluation instead of performing additional investigations (i.e., ultrasound) is a safe treatment strategy in case there is low suspicion of appendicitis.

Establishing a core outcome set for treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis in children: study protocol for an international Delphi survey

INTRODUCTION

Appendicitis is a global disease affecting roughly 1 in every 12 people in the world, with the highest incidence between ages 10 and 19 years. To date, a wide variety of health outcomes have been reported in randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses evaluating treatments for appendicitis. This is especially the case in studies comparing non-operative treatment with operative treatment. A set of standard outcomes, to be reported in all future trials, is needed to allow for adequate comparison and interpretation of clinical trial results and to make data pooling possible. This protocol describes the development of such a global core outcome set (COS) to allow unified reporting of treatment interventions in children with acute uncomplicated appendicitis.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We use current international standard methodology for the development and reporting of this COS. Its development consists of three phases: (1) an update of the most recent systematic review on outcomes reported in uncomplicated paediatric appendicitis research to identify additional outcomes, (2) a three-step global Delphi study to identify a set of core outcomes for which there is consensus between parents and (paediatric) surgeons and (3) an expert meeting to finalise the COS and its definitions. Children and young people will be involved through their parents during phase 2 and will be engaged directly using a customised face-to-face approach.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The medical research ethics committee of the Academic Medical Center Amsterdam has approved the study. Each participating country/research group will ascertain ethics board approval. Electronic informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Results will be presented in peer-reviewed academic journals and at (international) conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

COMET registration: 1119.

Outcome of initially nonoperative treatment for acute simple appendicitis in children

PURPOSE

To compare the outcome of initially nonoperative treatment with immediate appendectomy for simple appendicitis in children.

METHODS

Between September 2012 and June 2014 children aged 7-17 years with a radiologically confirmed simple appendicitis were invited to participate in a multicentre prospective cohort study in which they were treated with an initially nonoperative treatment strategy; nonparticipants underwent immediate appendectomy. In October 2015, their rates of complications and subsequent appendectomies, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were assessed.

RESULTS

In this period, 25 children were treated with an initially nonoperative treatment strategy and 19 with immediate appendectomy; median (range) follow-up was 25 (16-36) and 26 (17-34) months, respectively. The percentage [95%CI] of patients experiencing complications in the initially nonoperative group and the immediate appendectomy group was 12 [4-30]% and 11 [3-31]%, respectively. In total 6/25 children (24%) underwent an appendectomy; none of the 6 patients operated subsequently experienced any postappendectomy complications. Overall, HRQOL in the nonoperative treatment group was similar to that of healthy peers.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcome of initially nonoperative treatment for acute simple appendicitis in children is similar to the outcome in those who undergo immediate appendectomy. Initially nonoperative management seems to be able to avoid appendectomy in 3 out of 4 children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 (prospective comparative study). This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Initial non-operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis in children: a protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (APAC trial)

INTRODUCTION

Based on epidemiological, immunological and pathology data, the idea that appendicitis is not necessarily a progressive disease is gaining ground. Two types are distinguished: simple and complicated appendicitis. Non-operative treatment (NOT) of children with simple appendicitis has been investigated in several small studies. So far, it is deemed safe. However, its effectiveness and effect on quality of life (QoL) have yet to be established in an adequately powered randomised trial. In this article, we provide the study protocol for the APAC (Antibiotics versus Primary Appendectomy in Children) trial.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial randomises children aged 7-17 years with imaging-confirmed simple appendicitis between appendectomy and NOT. Patients are recruited in 15 hospitals. The intended sample size, based on the primary outcome, rate of complications and a non-inferiority margin of 5%, is 334 patients.NOT consists of intravenous antibiotics for 48-72 hours, daily blood tests and ultrasound follow-up. If the patient meets the predefined discharge criteria, antibiotic treatment is continued orally at home. Primary outcome is the rate of complications at 1-year follow-up. An independent adjudication committee will assess all complications and their relation to the allocated treatment. Secondary outcomes include, but are not limited to, delayed appendectomies, QoL, pain and (in)direct costs.The primary outcome will be analysed both according to the intention-to-treat principle and the per-protocol principle, and is presented with a one-sided 97.5% CI. We will use multiple logistic and linear regression for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively, to adjust for stratification factors.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee of the Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam. Data monitoring is performed by an independent institute and a Data Safety Monitoring Board has been assigned. Results will be presented in peer-reviewed academic journals and at (international) conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02848820; NTR5977; Pre-results.

Unexpected findings after surgery for suspected appendicitis rarely change treatment in pediatric patients; Results from a cohort study

BACKGROUND

To determine if non-operative treatment is safe in children with acute appendicitis, we evaluated the incidence of unexpected findings after an appendectomy in children, and the influence they have on subsequent treatment.

METHODS

A historical cohort study (January 2004-December 2014) was performed including children, aged 0-17 years, who underwent an appendectomy for the suspicion of acute appendicitis. Patients were divided based upon histopathological examination. Unexpected findings were reviewed, as well as the subsequent treatment plan.

RESULTS

In total 484 patients were included in this study. In the overall group, unexpected findings were noted in 10 (2.1%) patients of which two patients intra-operatively with a non-inflamed appendix (Ileitis terminalis N=1 and ovarian torsion N=1) and in 8 patients on histopathological examination. The latter group consisted of 4 patients with concomitant simple appendicitis (parasitic infection N=3 and Walthard cell rest N=1), two with concomitant complex appendicitis (carcinoid N=1 and parasitic infection N=1) and two patients with a non-inflamed appendix (endometriosis N=1 and parasitic infection N=1). Treatment was changed in 4 patients (<1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study corroborate the safety of non-operative strategy for acute simple appendicitis, as the occurrence of unexpected findings was low, with extremely few necessary changes of the treatment plan because of serious findings.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prognosis study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2 (retrospective cohort study).

Systematic review of nonoperative versus operative treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis

BACKGROUND

To compare the risk of complications between initial nonoperative treatment and appendectomy of uncomplicated (simple) appendicitis in children.

METHODS

Systematic literature search. Eligible for inclusion were both and randomized controlled trials and cohort studies including children in which the outcome of nonoperative treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis was reported with a minimum follow-up period of one year. Two authors extracted data independently and assessed quality. Primary outcome parameter was the percentage of children experiencing complications. Secondary outcomes were early failures, recurrent appendicitis and appendectomies, for all indications and on request.

RESULTS

Five of the 2051 articles screened were eligible for inclusion, including 147 children (nonoperative treatment) and 173 children (appendectomy) with one year follow-up. Percentage of children experiencing complications ranged from 0 to 13% versus 0-17% for nonoperative and appendectomy, respectively. Nonoperative treatment avoided an appendectomy in 62-81% of the children after one year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The evidence base for initial nonoperative treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children is by far insufficient. It suggests that the percentage of patients experiencing complications in the initial nonoperative treatment group is comparable to the appendectomy group, and it may avoid an appendectomy in the large majority of children after one year follow-up.

TYPE OF STUDY

Systematic review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1.

Composition of the cellular infiltrate in patients with simple and complex appendicitis

BACKGROUND

It is now well established that there are two types of appendicitis: simple (nonperforating) and complex (perforating). This study evaluates differences in the composition of the immune cellular infiltrate in children with simple and complex appendicitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 47 consecutive children undergoing appendectomy for acute appendicitis between January 2011 and December 2012 were included. Intraoperative criteria were used to identify patients with either simple or complex appendicitis and were confirmed histopathologically. Immune histochemical techniques were used to identify immune cell markers in the appendiceal specimens. Digital imaging analysis was performed using Image J.

RESULTS

In the specimens of patients with complex appendicitis, significantly more myeloperoxidase positive cells (neutrophils) (8.7% versus 1.2%, P < 0.001) were detected compared to patients with a simple appendicitis. In contrast, fewer CD8+ T cells (0.4% versus 1.3%, P = 0.016), CD20 + cells (2.9% versus 9.0%, P = 0.027), and CD21 + cells (0.2% versus 0.6%, P = 0.028) were present in tissue from patients with complex compared to simple appendicitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in proinflammatory innate cells and decrease of adaptive cells in patients with complex appendicitis suggest potential aggravating processes in complex appendicitis. Further research into the underlying mechanisms may identify novel biomarkers to be able to differentiate simple and complex appendicitis.

Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015

Unequivocal international guidelines regarding the diagnosis and management of patients with acute appendicitis are lacking. The aim of the consensus meeting 2015 of the EAES was to generate a European guideline based on best available evidence and expert opinions of a panel of EAES members. After a systematic review of the literature by an international group of surgical research fellows, an expert panel with extensive clinical experience in the management of appendicitis discussed statements and recommendations. Statements and recommendations with more than 70 % agreement by the experts were selected for a web survey and the consensus meeting of the EAES in Bucharest in June 2015. EAES members and attendees at the EAES meeting in Bucharest could vote on these statements and recommendations. In the case of more than 70 % agreement, the statement or recommendation was defined as supported by the scientific community. Results from both the web survey and the consensus meeting in Bucharest are presented as percentages. In total, 46 statements and recommendations were selected for the web survey and consensus meeting. More than 232 members and attendees voted on them. In 41 of 46 statements and recommendations, more than 70 % agreement was reached. All 46 statements and recommendations are presented in this paper. They comprise topics regarding the diagnostic work-up, treatment indications, procedural aspects and post-operative care. The consensus meeting produced 46 statements and recommendations on the diagnostic work-up and management of appendicitis. The majority of the EAES members supported these statements. These consensus proceedings provide additional guidance to surgeons and surgical residents providing care to patients with appendicitis.

Intervention not always necessary in post-appendectomy abscesses in children; clinical experience in a tertiary surgical centre and an overview of the literature

This study aims to provide an overview of both our own experience and the available literature on the treatment of post-appendectomy abscess (PAA) in children. We performed a historical cohort study encompassing all children aged 0-17 years old treated for a radiologically confirmed PAA between 2007 and 2013. Their medical charts were reviewed and descriptive analyses were performed. A literature search on the treatment of PAA in children was performed. In our cohort, 25 out of 372 (7 %) children developed a PAA. Thirteen were treated with a noninvasive strategy and 12 with an invasive strategy (percutaneous or surgical drainage). The immediate success rate was 9/13 (69 %) and 8/12 (67 %) for the noninvasive and invasive strategy, respectively. In both groups, four children (31 and 33 % resp.) required delayed interventions after their initial treatment. In the literature review, six studies were included which reported a median (range) frequency of persistent or recurrent abscess of 9 % (0-30 %), 50 % (0-100 %) and 24 % (0-33 %) for the antibiotic (noninvasive), percutaneous drainage (invasive) and surgical drainage strategies, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although confounding by indication cannot be excluded, we recommend noninvasive treatment as a safe strategy for PAA in children with stable condition.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Post-appendectomy abscess is a well-known and feared complication, occurring in up to 24 % of the children treated surgically for appendicitis. • Several strategies are available to treat this condition, all with advantages and disadvantages. What is new: • Noninvasive strategy is a safe strategy for children with a PAA in a stable condition. • An overview of the literature (the first to our knowledge) supports the above-mentioned statement.

Impact of trimodality treatment on patient quality of life and arm function for superior sulcus tumors

BACKGROUND

Trimodality treatment leads to improved survival for superior sulcus tumor (SST) patients. Not much is known about the impact of this treatment on arm function and patient quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze arm function and quality of life in SST patients undergoing trimodality treatment.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of consecutive SST patients treated with trimodality treatment that was conducted between April 1, 2010 and October 31, 2012. We obtained informed consent for 20 of 22 eligible patients. The 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaires were used to asses patient quality of life and subjective arm function at 0 (preoperative day), 3, and 12 months after trimodality treatment.

RESULTS

DASH scores were significantly lower at 3 and 12 months (𝑃 = .024 and 𝑃 = .011) compared with preoperative scores. Significantly lower scores were reported for the SF-36 domains of physical functioning at 12 months (𝑃 = .020) and of physical role functioning at 3 months (𝑃 = .041), and significantly more pain was reported at 3 and 12 months (𝑃 = .006 and 𝑃 = .019, respectively). Patients who underwent T1 nerve root resection had lower scores for the SF-36 domain health change at 3 months (𝑃 = .037) compared with those in whom the T1 root was spared. For all other domains no differences were found.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size; patient pre-chemoradiation function and quality of life unknown.

CONCLUSION

Subjective arm function and patient quality of life is reduced following trimodality treatment. Resection of the T1 nerve root has no significant long-term effect on the subjective arm function and quality of life.

[Mesenteric venous thrombosis during pregnancy; a rare cause of acute ischaemia of the small intestine]

BACKGROUND

Acute ischaemia of the small intestine is caused by mesenteric venous thrombosis in 5-15% of patients. The non-specific symptoms frequently lead to a diagnostic delay.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 30-year-old pregnant woman presented at the accident and emergency department with progressive abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting. During admission the patient developed signs of peritonitis. Diagnostic laparoscopy revealed a picture of mesenteric venous thrombosis, and we resected 170 cm ischemic small intestine. No underlying cause was identified, apart from the pregnancy. The patient was treated with low-molecular-weight heparin and later gave birth to a healthy child.

CONCLUSION

If a patient presents with (unexplained) progressive abdominal symptoms and disproportional abdominal pain without peritonitis, the possibility of intestinal ischaemia should be considered during differential diagnosis.