1
|
Swinton M, Dubec M, McHugh D, Biglin E, Sanchez DF, Oliveira P, Price G, McWilliam A, van Herk M, Hoskin P, Buckley DL, Hudson A, Bristow RG, Choudhury A. Validation of Hypoxia Detection Sequences on the MR Linac. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e723-e724. [PMID: 37786109 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.2234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MRL) systems permit acquisition of novel imaging at the time of radiotherapy. A validated MR hypoxia imaging biomarker could select patients for adaptive radiotherapy with hypoxia modification or dose escalation. The aims of this study were (1) to develop a protocol for quantitative hypoxia sensitive MRI (2) to validate these in prostate cancer (PCa) against pimonidazole-stained prostatectomy sections. MATERIALS/METHODS Blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), oxygen-enhanced (OE) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI were used. Sequences were developed on a diagnostic 1.5 T MR (MRD) and MRL with healthy volunteers and PCa patients. The Hyprogen trial includes men with localized PCa scheduled for prostatectomy. Imaging is acquired twice prior to surgery and oral pimonidazole is taken 8-16 hours before surgery. Whole prostate (WP) and dominant prostatic lesion (DIL) were outlined on T2-weighted (T2W) images and a 'normal prostate' (NP) volume created by subtracting DIL from WP. Contours were applied to parametric maps from the quantitative MRI, with median and IQR extracted. Patient-specific 3D-printed prostate molds were created from WP volumes and used to guide prostate whole organ dissection. RESULTS Three of 20 patients recruited to date. MRI data were acquired successfully. A personalized prostate mold was produced for each patient and facilitated dissection of the prostatectomy specimen in a matching plane to MRI to validate hypoxia detection of the MR protocol. Correlation with pimonidazole staining is underway. Imaging parameter median values for NP and DIL acquired on MRD and MRL for the first patient are shown (Table 1). The expected differences between NP and DIL for T1 and D are seen and median values for T2* are consistent with reported values in the literature. CONCLUSION The MR hypoxia protocol can be acquired safely and is well-tolerated on the MRL. Once validated against pimonidazole staining adaptive radiotherapy protocols will be developed to use this information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Swinton
- Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - M Dubec
- University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - D McHugh
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - E Biglin
- University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - D F Sanchez
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - P Oliveira
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - G Price
- The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - A McWilliam
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - M van Herk
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - P Hoskin
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - D L Buckley
- Biomedical Imaging, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - A Hudson
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - R G Bristow
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - A Choudhury
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gillessen S, Bossi A, Davis ID, de Bono J, Fizazi K, James ND, Mottet N, Shore N, Small E, Smith M, Sweeney CJ, Tombal B, Antonarakis ES, Aparicio AM, Armstrong AJ, Attard G, Beer TM, Beltran H, Bjartell A, Blanchard P, Briganti A, Bristow RG, Bulbul M, Caffo O, Castellano D, Castro E, Cheng HH, Chi KN, Chowdhury S, Clarke CS, Clarke N, Daugaard G, De Santis M, Duran I, Eeles R, Efstathiou E, Efstathiou J, Ekeke ON, Evans CP, Fanti S, Feng FY, Fonteyne V, Fossati N, Frydenberg M, George D, Gleave M, Gravis G, Halabi S, Heinrich D, Herrmann K, Higano C, Hofman MS, Horvath LG, Hussain M, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kanesvaran R, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Khauli RB, Klotz L, Kramer G, Leibowitz R, Logothetis C, Mahal B, Maluf F, Mateo J, Matheson D, Mehra N, Merseburger A, Morgans AK, Morris MJ, Mrabti H, Mukherji D, Murphy DG, Murthy V, Nguyen PL, Oh WK, Ost P, O'Sullivan JM, Padhani AR, Pezaro CJ, Poon DMC, Pritchard CC, Rabah DM, Rathkopf D, Reiter RE, Rubin MA, Ryan CJ, Saad F, Sade JP, Sartor O, Scher HI, Sharifi N, Skoneczna I, Soule H, Spratt DE, Srinivas S, Sternberg CN, Steuber T, Suzuki H, Sydes MR, Taplin ME, Tilki D, Türkeri L, Turco F, Uemura H, Uemura H, Ürün Y, Vale CL, van Oort I, Vapiwala N, Walz J, Yamoah K, Ye D, Yu EY, Zapatero A, Zilli T, Omlin A. Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer-metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2022. Eur J Cancer 2023; 185:178-215. [PMID: 37003085 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovations in imaging and molecular characterisation together with novel treatment options have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. However, we still lack high-level evidence in many areas relevant to making management decisions in daily clinical practise. The 2022 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022) addressed some questions in these areas to supplement guidelines that mostly are based on level 1 evidence. OBJECTIVE To present the voting results of the APCCC 2022. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The experts voted on controversial questions where high-level evidence is mostly lacking: locally advanced prostate cancer; biochemical recurrence after local treatment; metastatic hormone-sensitive, non-metastatic, and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; oligometastatic prostate cancer; and managing side effects of hormonal therapy. A panel of 105 international prostate cancer experts voted on the consensus questions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The panel voted on 198 pre-defined questions, which were developed by 117 voting and non-voting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process. A total of 116 questions on metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer are discussed in this manuscript. In 2022, the voting was done by a web-based survey because of COVID-19 restrictions. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The voting reflects the expert opinion of these panellists and did not incorporate a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions received varying degrees of support from panellists, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results are reported in the supplementary material. We report here on topics in metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and oligometastatic and oligoprogressive prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS These voting results in four specific areas from a panel of experts in advanced prostate cancer can help clinicians and patients navigate controversial areas of management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting and can help research funders and policy makers identify information gaps and consider what areas to explore further. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions always have to be individualised based on patient characteristics, including the extent and location of disease, prior treatment(s), co-morbidities, patient preferences, and treatment recommendations and should also incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2022 once again identified important gaps where there is non-consensus and that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials. PATIENT SUMMARY The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) provides a forum to discuss and debate current diagnostic and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. The conference aims to share the knowledge of international experts in prostate cancer with healthcare providers worldwide. At each APCCC, an expert panel votes on pre-defined questions that target the most clinically relevant areas of advanced prostate cancer treatment for which there are gaps in knowledge. The results of the voting provide a practical guide to help clinicians discuss therapeutic options with patients and their relatives as part of shared and multidisciplinary decision-making. This report focuses on the advanced setting, covering metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and both non-metastatic and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. TWITTER SUMMARY Report of the results of APCCC 2022 for the following topics: mHSPC, nmCRPC, mCRPC, and oligometastatic prostate cancer. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE At APCCC 2022, clinically important questions in the management of advanced prostate cancer management were identified and discussed, and experts voted on pre-defined consensus questions. The report of the results for metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer is summarised here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Genitourinary Oncology, Prostate Brachytherapy Unit, Gustave Roussy, Paris, France
| | - Ian D Davis
- Monash University and Eastern Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Johann de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Karim Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - Neal Shore
- Medical Director, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA; CMO, Urology/Surgical Oncology, GenesisCare, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Eric Small
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher J Sweeney
- South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | | | - Ana M Aparicio
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Armstrong
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Tomasz M Beer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Radiothérapie, Université Paris-Saclay, Oncostat, Inserm U-1018, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Rob G Bristow
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Christie NHS Trust and CRUK Manchester Institute and Cancer Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Muhammad Bulbul
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, 38122 Trento, Italy
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Castro
- Institute of Biomedical Research in Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Heather H Cheng
- University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kim N Chi
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Simon Chowdhury
- Guys and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline S Clarke
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK
| | - Noel Clarke
- The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester, UK
| | - Gedske Daugaard
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Ross Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Jason Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Onyeanunam Ngozi Ekeke
- Department of Surgery, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Alakahia, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
| | | | - Stefano Fanti
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Felix Y Feng
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Valerie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Civico USI - Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Prostate Cancer Research Program, Department of Anatomy & Developmental Biology, Faculty Nursing, Medicine & Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dan George
- Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Martin Gleave
- Urological Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel Heinrich
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Celestia Higano
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lisa G Horvath
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Maha Hussain
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Rob Jones
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | | | - Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tampere Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland; Research, Development and Innovation Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Raja B Khauli
- Division of Urology and the Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute (NKBCI), American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gero Kramer
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Raja Leibowitz
- Oncology Institute, Shamir Medical Center, Be'er Ya'akov, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Christopher Logothetis
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; University of Athens Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Brandon Mahal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Fernando Maluf
- Beneficiência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil; Departamento de Oncologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Joaquin Mateo
- Department of Medical Oncology and Prostate Cancer Translational Research Group. Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Matheson
- Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, Walsall Campus, Walsall, UK
| | - Niven Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Axel Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Alicia K Morgans
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael J Morris
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hind Mrabti
- National Institute of Oncology, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Deborah Mukherji
- Clemenceau Medical Center Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William K Oh
- Chief, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Carmel J Pezaro
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Darren M C Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong; The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Danny M Rabah
- Cancer Research Chair and Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Urology, KFSHRC Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dana Rathkopf
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Mark A Rubin
- Bern Center for Precision Medicine and Department for Biomedical Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Charles J Ryan
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre Hospitalier de Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | | | - Howard I Scher
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nima Sharifi
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, GU Malignancies Research Center, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Iwona Skoneczna
- Rafal Masztak Grochowski Hospital, Maria Sklodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Howard Soule
- Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sandy Srinivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Cora N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Meyer Cancer Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Steuber
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Matthew R Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Levent Türkeri
- Department of Urology, M.A. Aydınlar Acıbadem University, Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fabio Turco
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Hiroji Uemura
- Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hirotsugu Uemura
- Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yüksel Ürün
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; Ankara University Cancer Research Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Claire L Vale
- University College London, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | - Inge van Oort
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Centre, Marseille, France
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, G4-830, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Aurelius Omlin
- Onkozentrum Zurich, University of Zurich and Tumorzentrum Hirslanden Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oing C, Bristow RG. Systemic treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer-upfront triplet versus doublet combination therapy. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101194. [PMID: 36947986 PMCID: PMC10040503 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- C Oing
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Sir Bobby Robson Cancer Trials Research Centre, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - R G Bristow
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gillessen S, Bossi A, Davis ID, de Bono J, Fizazi K, James ND, Mottet N, Shore N, Small E, Smith M, Sweeney C, Tombal B, Antonarakis ES, Aparicio AM, Armstrong AJ, Attard G, Beer TM, Beltran H, Bjartell A, Blanchard P, Briganti A, Bristow RG, Bulbul M, Caffo O, Castellano D, Castro E, Cheng HH, Chi KN, Chowdhury S, Clarke CS, Clarke N, Daugaard G, De Santis M, Duran I, Eeles R, Efstathiou E, Efstathiou J, Ngozi Ekeke O, Evans CP, Fanti S, Feng FY, Fonteyne V, Fossati N, Frydenberg M, George D, Gleave M, Gravis G, Halabi S, Heinrich D, Herrmann K, Higano C, Hofman MS, Horvath LG, Hussain M, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kanesvaran R, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Khauli RB, Klotz L, Kramer G, Leibowitz R, Logothetis CJ, Mahal BA, Maluf F, Mateo J, Matheson D, Mehra N, Merseburger A, Morgans AK, Morris MJ, Mrabti H, Mukherji D, Murphy DG, Murthy V, Nguyen PL, Oh WK, Ost P, O'Sullivan JM, Padhani AR, Pezaro C, Poon DMC, Pritchard CC, Rabah DM, Rathkopf D, Reiter RE, Rubin MA, Ryan CJ, Saad F, Pablo Sade J, Sartor OA, Scher HI, Sharifi N, Skoneczna I, Soule H, Spratt DE, Srinivas S, Sternberg CN, Steuber T, Suzuki H, Sydes MR, Taplin ME, Tilki D, Türkeri L, Turco F, Uemura H, Uemura H, Ürün Y, Vale CL, van Oort I, Vapiwala N, Walz J, Yamoah K, Ye D, Yu EY, Zapatero A, Zilli T, Omlin A. Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer. Part I: Intermediate-/High-risk and Locally Advanced Disease, Biochemical Relapse, and Side Effects of Hormonal Treatment: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2022. Eur Urol 2023; 83:267-293. [PMID: 36494221 PMCID: PMC7614721 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovations in imaging and molecular characterisation and the evolution of new therapies have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. Nonetheless, we continue to lack high-level evidence on a variety of clinical topics that greatly impact daily practice. To supplement evidence-based guidelines, the 2022 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022) surveyed experts about key dilemmas in clinical management. OBJECTIVE To present consensus voting results for select questions from APCCC 2022. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Before the conference, a panel of 117 international prostate cancer experts used a modified Delphi process to develop 198 multiple-choice consensus questions on (1) intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer, (2) biochemical recurrence after local treatment, (3) side effects from hormonal therapies, (4) metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, (5) nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, (6) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and (7) oligometastatic and oligoprogressive prostate cancer. Before the conference, these questions were administered via a web-based survey to the 105 physician panel members ("panellists") who directly engage in prostate cancer treatment decision-making. Herein, we present results for the 82 questions on topics 1-3. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The voting results reveal varying degrees of consensus, as is discussed in this article and shown in the detailed results in the Supplementary material. The findings reflect the opinions of an international panel of experts and did not incorporate a formal literature review and meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS These voting results by a panel of international experts in advanced prostate cancer can help physicians and patients navigate controversial areas of clinical management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting. The findings can also help funders and policymakers prioritise areas for future research. Diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised based on patient and cancer characteristics (disease extent and location, treatment history, comorbidities, and patient preferences) and should incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence, therapeutic guidelines, and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is always strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2022 once again identified important gaps (areas of nonconsensus) that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials. PATIENT SUMMARY The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) provides a forum to discuss and debate current diagnostic and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. The conference aims to share the knowledge of international experts in prostate cancer with health care providers and patients worldwide. At each APCCC, a panel of physician experts vote in response to multiple-choice questions about their clinical opinions and approaches to managing advanced prostate cancer. This report presents voting results for the subset of questions pertaining to intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer, biochemical relapse after definitive treatment, advanced (next-generation) imaging, and management of side effects caused by hormonal therapies. The results provide a practical guide to help clinicians and patients discuss treatment options as part of shared multidisciplinary decision-making. The findings may be especially useful when there is little or no high-level evidence to guide treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Genitourinary Oncology, Prostate Brachytherapy Unit, Gustave Roussy, Paris, France
| | - Ian D Davis
- Monash University and Eastern Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Johann de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Karim Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA; Urology/Surgical Oncology, GenesisCare, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Eric Small
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mathew Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher Sweeney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Ana M Aparicio
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Armstrong
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Tomasz M Beer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Département de Radiothérapie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Rob G Bristow
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Christie NHS Trust and CRUK Manchester Institute and Cancer Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Muhammad Bulbul
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Castro
- Institute of Biomedical Research in Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Heather H Cheng
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kim N Chi
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Caroline S Clarke
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK
| | - Noel Clarke
- The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester, UK
| | - Gedske Daugaard
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Ros Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Jason Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Onyeanunam Ngozi Ekeke
- Department of Surgery, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Alakahia, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
| | | | - Stefano Fanti
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Felix Y Feng
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Valerie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Civico USI - Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Prostate Cancer Research Program, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Anatomy & Developmental Biology, Faculty of Nursing, Medicine & Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Daniel George
- Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Martin Gleave
- Urological Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel Heinrich
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Celestia Higano
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lisa G Horvath
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Maha Hussain
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Robert Jones
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tampere Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland; Research, Development and Innovation Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Raja B Khauli
- Department of Urology and the Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute (NKBCI), American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gero Kramer
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Raya Leibowitz
- Oncology Institute, Shamir Medical Center, Be'er Ya'akov, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Christopher J Logothetis
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; University of Athens Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Brandon A Mahal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Fernando Maluf
- Beneficiência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil; Departamento de Oncologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Joaquin Mateo
- Department of Medical Oncology and Prostate Cancer Translational Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Matheson
- Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, Walsall Campus, Walsall, UK
| | - Niven Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Axel Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Alicia K Morgans
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael J Morris
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hind Mrabti
- National Institute of Oncology, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Deborah Mukherji
- Clemenceau Medical Center, Dubai, United Arab Emirates; Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William K Oh
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Carmel Pezaro
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Darren M C Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong; The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Danny M Rabah
- Cancer Research Chair and Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Urology, KFSHRC, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dana Rathkopf
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Mark A Rubin
- Bern Center for Precision Medicine and Department for Biomedical Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Charles J Ryan
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre Hospitalier de Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | - Howard I Scher
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nima Sharifi
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, GU Malignancies Research Center, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Iwona Skoneczna
- Rafal Masztak Grochowski Hospital, Maria Sklodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Howard Soule
- Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sandy Srinivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Cora N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Meyer Cancer Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Steuber
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Matthew R Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Levent Türkeri
- Department of Urology, M.A. Aydınlar Acıbadem University, Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fabio Turco
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Hiroji Uemura
- Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hirotsugu Uemura
- Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yüksel Ürün
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; Ankara University Cancer Research Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Claire L Vale
- University College London, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | - Inge van Oort
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Centre, Marseille, France
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Aurelius Omlin
- Onkozentrum Zurich, University of Zurich and Tumorzentrum Hirslanden Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Turco F, Armstrong A, Attard G, Beer TM, Beltran H, Bjartell A, Bossi A, Briganti A, Bristow RG, Bulbul M, Caffo O, Chi KN, Clarke C, Clarke N, Davis ID, de Bono J, Duran I, Eeles R, Efstathiou E, Efstathiou J, Evans CP, Fanti S, Feng FY, Fizazi K, Frydenberg M, George D, Gleave M, Halabi S, Heinrich D, Higano C, Hofman MS, Hussain M, James N, Jones R, Kanesvaran R, Khauli RB, Klotz L, Leibowitz R, Logothetis C, Maluf F, Millman R, Morgans AK, Morris MJ, Mottet N, Mrabti H, Murphy DG, Murthy V, Oh WK, Ekeke Onyeanunam N, Ost P, O'Sullivan JM, Padhani AR, Parker C, Poon DMC, Pritchard CC, Rabah DM, Rathkopf D, Reiter RE, Rubin M, Ryan CJ, Saad F, Pablo Sade J, Sartor O, Scher HI, Shore N, Skoneczna I, Small E, Smith M, Soule H, Spratt D, Sternberg CN, Suzuki H, Sweeney C, Sydes M, Taplin ME, Tilki D, Tombal B, Türkeri L, Uemura H, Uemura H, van Oort I, Yamoah K, Ye D, Zapatero A, Gillessen S, Omlin A. What Experts Think About Prostate Cancer Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Report from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021. Eur Urol 2022; 82:6-11. [PMID: 35393158 PMCID: PMC8849852 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Patients with advanced prostate cancer (APC) may be at greater risk for severe illness, hospitalisation, or death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to male gender, older age, potential immunosuppressive treatments, or comorbidities. Thus, the optimal management of APC patients during the COVID-19 pandemic is complex. In October 2021, during the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2021, the 73 voting members of the panel members discussed and voted on 13 questions on this topic that could help clinicians make treatment choices during the pandemic. There was a consensus for full COVID-19 vaccination and booster injection in APC patients. Furthermore, the voting results indicate that the expert's treatment recommendations are influenced by the vaccination status: the COVID-19 pandemic altered management of APC patients for 70% of the panellists before the vaccination was available but only for 25% of panellists for fully vaccinated patients. Most experts (71%) were less likely to use docetaxel and abiraterone in unvaccinated patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. For fully vaccinated patients with high-risk localised prostate cancer, there was a consensus (77%) to follow the usual treatment schedule, whereas in unvaccinated patients, 55% of the panel members voted for deferring radiation therapy. Finally, there was a strong consensus for the use of telemedicine for monitoring APC patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: In the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021, the panellists reached a consensus regarding the recommendation of the COVID-19 vaccine in prostate cancer patients and use of telemedicine for monitoring these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Turco
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
| | - Andrew Armstrong
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Tomasz M Beer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Genito Urinary Oncology, Prostate Brachytherapy Unit, Goustave Roussy, Paris, France
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Rob G Bristow
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Christie NHS Trust and CRUK Manchester Institute and Cancer Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Muhammad Bulbul
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Kim N Chi
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Caroline Clarke
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, Royal Free Campus, University College London, Rowland Hill St, London, UK
| | - Noel Clarke
- The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester, UK
| | - Ian D Davis
- Monash University and Eastern Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Johann de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research/Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Department of Medical Oncology. Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Ros Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Jason Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Stefano Fanti
- Policlinico S. Orsola, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Felix Y Feng
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Karim Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Prostate Cancer Research Program, Department of Anatomy & Developmental Biology, Faculty of Nursing, Medicine & Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dan George
- Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Martin Gleave
- Urological Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel Heinrich
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Celestia Higano
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Maha Hussain
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Rob Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Raja B Khauli
- Department of Urology and the Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute (NKBCI), American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raya Leibowitz
- Oncology institute, Shamir Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Christopher Logothetis
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece; David H. Koch Centre, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Fernando Maluf
- Beneficiência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Departamento de Oncologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Alicia K Morgans
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Hind Mrabti
- National Institute of Oncology, University hospital, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - William K Oh
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ngozi Ekeke Onyeanunam
- Department of Surgery, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Alakahia, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland; Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Darren M C Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Danny M Rabah
- The Cancer Research Chair, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dana Rathkopf
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Mark Rubin
- Bern Center for Precision Medicine, Bern, Switzerland; Department for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Charles J Ryan
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre Hospitalier de Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | | | - Howard I Scher
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Iwona Skoneczna
- Rafal Masztak Grochowski Hospital in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland; Maria Sklodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Eric Small
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Howard Soule
- Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Spratt
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Cora N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Meyer Cancer Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Christopher Sweeney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Levent Türkeri
- Department of Urology, M.A. Aydınlar Acıbadem University, Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hiroji Uemura
- Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hirotsugu Uemura
- Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Inge van Oort
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Universita della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland; Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Division of Cancer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Aurelius Omlin
- University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Turco F, Armstrong A, Attard G, Beer TM, Beltran H, Bjartell A, Bossi A, Briganti A, Bristow RG, Bulbul M, Caffo O, Chi KN, Clarke C, Clarke N, Davis ID, de Bono J, Duran I, Eeles R, Efstathiou E, Efstathiou J, Evans CP, Fanti S, Feng FY, Fizazi K, Frydenberg M, George D, Gleave M, Halabi S, Heinrich D, Higano C, Hofman MS, Hussain M, James N, Jones R, Kanesvaran R, Khauli RB, Klotz L, Leibowitz R, Logothetis C, Maluf F, Millman R, Morgans AK, Morris MJ, Mottet N, Mrabti H, Murphy DG, Murthy V, Oh WK, Ekeke ON, Ost P, O'Sullivan JM, Padhani AR, Parker C, Poon DMC, Pritchard CC, Rabah DM, Rathkopf D, Reiter RE, Rubin M, Ryan CJ, Saad F, Sade JP, Sartor O, Scher HI, Shore N, Skoneczna I, Small E, Smith M, Soule H, Spratt D, Sternberg CN, Suzuki H, Sweeney C, Sydes M, Taplin ME, Tilki D, Tombal B, Türkeri L, Uemura H, Uemura H, van Oort I, Yamoah K, Ye D, Zapatero A, Gillessen S, Omlin A. Corrigendum to "What Experts Think About Prostate Cancer Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Report from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021" [Eur Urol 82(1):6-11]. Eur Urol 2022; 82:e18-e19. [PMID: 35440417 PMCID: PMC9012951 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Turco
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
| | - Andrew Armstrong
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Tomasz M Beer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Genito Urinary Oncology, Prostate Brachytherapy Unit, Goustave Roussy, Paris, France
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Rob G Bristow
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Christie NHS Trust and CRUK Manchester Institute and Cancer Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Muhammad Bulbul
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Kim N Chi
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Caroline Clarke
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, Royal Free Campus, University College London, Rowland Hill St, London, UK
| | - Noel Clarke
- The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester, UK
| | - Ian D Davis
- Monash University and Eastern Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Johann de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research/Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Department of Medical Oncology. Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Ros Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Jason Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Stefano Fanti
- Policlinico S. Orsola, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Felix Y Feng
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Karim Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Prostate Cancer Research Program, Department of Anatomy & Developmental Biology, Faculty of Nursing, Medicine & Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dan George
- Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Martin Gleave
- Urological Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel Heinrich
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Celestia Higano
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Maha Hussain
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Rob Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Raja B Khauli
- Department of Urology and the Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute (NKBCI), American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raya Leibowitz
- Oncology institute, Shamir Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Christopher Logothetis
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece; David H. Koch Centre, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Fernando Maluf
- Beneficiência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil; Departamento de Oncologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Alicia K Morgans
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Hind Mrabti
- National Institute of Oncology, University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - William K Oh
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Onyeanunam Ngozi Ekeke
- Department of Surgery, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Alakahia, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland; Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Darren M C Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Danny M Rabah
- The Cancer Research Chair, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dana Rathkopf
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Mark Rubin
- Bern Center for Precision Medicine, Bern, Switzerland; Department for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Charles J Ryan
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre Hospitalier de Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | | | - Howard I Scher
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Iwona Skoneczna
- Rafal Masztak Grochowski Hospital in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland; Maria Sklodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Eric Small
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Howard Soule
- Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Spratt
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Cora N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Meyer Cancer Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Christopher Sweeney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Levent Türkeri
- Department of Urology, M.A. Aydınlar Acıbadem University, Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hiroji Uemura
- Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hirotsugu Uemura
- Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Inge van Oort
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Universita della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland; Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Division of Cancer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Aurelius Omlin
- University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Plante A, Dallaire F, Grosset AA, Nguyen T, Birlea M, Wong J, Daoust F, Roy N, Kougioumoutzakis A, Azzi F, Aubertin K, Kadoury S, Latour M, Albadine R, Prendeville S, Boutros P, Fraser M, Bristow RG, van der Kwast T, Orain M, Brisson H, Benzerdjeb N, Hovington H, Bergeron A, Fradet Y, Têtu B, Saad F, Trudel D, Leblond F. Dimensional reduction based on peak fitting of Raman micro spectroscopy data improves detection of prostate cancer in tissue specimens. J Biomed Opt 2021; 26:JBO-210212R. [PMID: 34743445 PMCID: PMC8571651 DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.26.11.116501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men. An accurate diagnosis of its severity at detection plays a major role in improving their survival. Recently, machine learning models using biomarkers identified from Raman micro-spectroscopy discriminated intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) from cancer tissue with a ≥85 % detection accuracy and differentiated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) from IDC-P with a ≥97.8 % accuracy. AIM To improve the classification performance of machine learning models identifying different types of prostate cancer tissue using a new dimensional reduction technique. APPROACH A radial basis function (RBF) kernel support vector machine (SVM) model was trained on Raman spectra of prostate tissue from a 272-patient cohort (Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, CHUM) and tested on two independent cohorts of 76 patients [University Health Network (UHN)] and 135 patients (Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, CHUQc-UL). Two types of engineered features were used. Individual intensity features, i.e., Raman signal intensity measured at particular wavelengths and novel Raman spectra fitted peak features consisting of peak heights and widths. RESULTS Combining engineered features improved classification performance for the three aforementioned classification tasks. The improvements for IDC-P/cancer classification for the UHN and CHUQc-UL testing sets in accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) are (numbers in parenthesis are associated with the CHUQc-UL testing set): +4 % (+8 % ), +7 % (+9 % ), +2 % (6%), +9 (+9) with respect to the current best models. Discrimination between HGPIN and IDC-P was also improved in both testing cohorts: +2.2 % (+1.7 % ), +4.5 % (+3.6 % ), +0 % (+0 % ), +2.3 (+0). While no global improvements were obtained for the normal versus cancer classification task [+0 % (-2 % ), +0 % (-3 % ), +2 % (-2 % ), +4 (+3)], the AUC was improved in both testing sets. CONCLUSIONS Combining individual intensity features and novel Raman fitted peak features, improved the classification performance on two independent and multicenter testing sets in comparison to using only individual intensity features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Plante
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Polytechnique Montréal, Department of Engineering Physics, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Frédérick Dallaire
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Polytechnique Montréal, Department of Engineering Physics, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Andrée-Anne Grosset
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Université de Montréal, Department of Pathology and Cellular Biology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Tien Nguyen
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Polytechnique Montréal, Department of Engineering Physics, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mirela Birlea
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jahg Wong
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - François Daoust
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Polytechnique Montréal, Department of Engineering Physics, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Noémi Roy
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - André Kougioumoutzakis
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Feryel Azzi
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kelly Aubertin
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Samuel Kadoury
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Polytechnique Montréal, Department of Computer Engineering and Software Engineering, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mathieu Latour
- Université de Montréal, Department of Pathology and Cellular Biology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Department of Pathology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Roula Albadine
- Université de Montréal, Department of Pathology and Cellular Biology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Department of Pathology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Susan Prendeville
- University Health Network, Laboratory Medicine Program, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul Boutros
- Informatics & Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Human Genetics, Los Angeles, California, United States
- University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Urology, Los Angeles, California, United States
- University of California, Los Angeles, Institute for Precision Health, Los Angeles, California, United States
- University of California, Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Fraser
- Informatics & Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rob G. Bristow
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Michèle Orain
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Oncology Division, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Université Laval, Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hervé Brisson
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Oncology Division, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Université Laval, Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nazim Benzerdjeb
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Oncology Division, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Université Laval, Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hélène Hovington
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Oncology Division, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Université Laval, Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alain Bergeron
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Oncology Division, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Université Laval, Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Université Laval, Department of Surgery, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Yves Fradet
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Oncology Division, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Université Laval, Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Université Laval, Department of Surgery, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bernard Têtu
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Oncology Division, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Université Laval, Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Dominique Trudel
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Polytechnique Montréal, Department of Engineering Physics, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Frédéric Leblond
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Polytechnique Montréal, Department of Engineering Physics, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Université de Montréal, Department of Pathology and Cellular Biology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Grosset AA, Dallaire F, Nguyen T, Birlea M, Wong J, Daoust F, Roy N, Kougioumoutzakis A, Azzi F, Aubertin K, Kadoury S, Latour M, Albadine R, Prendeville S, Boutros P, Fraser M, Bristow RG, van der Kwast T, Orain M, Brisson H, Benzerdjeb N, Hovington H, Bergeron A, Fradet Y, Têtu B, Saad F, Leblond F, Trudel D. Identification of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate on tissue specimens using Raman micro-spectroscopy: A diagnostic accuracy case-control study with multicohort validation. PLoS Med 2020; 17:e1003281. [PMID: 32797086 PMCID: PMC7428053 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PC) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in North American men. Pathologists are in critical need of accurate biomarkers to characterize PC, particularly to confirm the presence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P), an aggressive histopathological variant for which therapeutic options are now available. Our aim was to identify IDC-P with Raman micro-spectroscopy (RμS) and machine learning technology following a protocol suitable for routine clinical histopathology laboratories. METHODS AND FINDINGS We used RμS to differentiate IDC-P from PC, as well as PC and IDC-P from benign tissue on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded first-line radical prostatectomy specimens (embedded in tissue microarrays [TMAs]) from 483 patients treated in 3 Canadian institutions between 1993 and 2013. The main measures were the presence or absence of IDC-P and of PC, regardless of the clinical outcomes. The median age at radical prostatectomy was 62 years. Most of the specimens from the first cohort (Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal) were of Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 (51%) while most of the specimens from the 2 other cohorts (University Health Network and Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec-Université Laval) were of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 (51% and 52%, respectively). Most of the 483 patients were pT2 stage (44%-69%), and pT3a (22%-49%) was more frequent than pT3b (9%-12%). To investigate the prostate tissue of each patient, 2 consecutive sections of each TMA block were cut. The first section was transferred onto a glass slide to perform immunohistochemistry with H&E counterstaining for cell identification. The second section was placed on an aluminum slide, dewaxed, and then used to acquire an average of 7 Raman spectra per specimen (between 4 and 24 Raman spectra, 4 acquisitions/TMA core). Raman spectra of each cell type were then analyzed to retrieve tissue-specific molecular information and to generate classification models using machine learning technology. Models were trained and cross-validated using data from 1 institution. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 87% ± 5%, 86% ± 6%, and 89% ± 8%, respectively, to differentiate PC from benign tissue, and 95% ± 2%, 96% ± 4%, and 94% ± 2%, respectively, to differentiate IDC-P from PC. The trained models were then tested on Raman spectra from 2 independent institutions, reaching accuracies, sensitivities, and specificities of 84% and 86%, 84% and 87%, and 81% and 82%, respectively, to diagnose PC, and of 85% and 91%, 85% and 88%, and 86% and 93%, respectively, for the identification of IDC-P. IDC-P could further be differentiated from high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), a pre-malignant intraductal proliferation that can be mistaken as IDC-P, with accuracies, sensitivities, and specificities > 95% in both training and testing cohorts. As we used stringent criteria to diagnose IDC-P, the main limitation of our study is the exclusion of borderline, difficult-to-classify lesions from our datasets. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we developed classification models for the analysis of RμS data to differentiate IDC-P, PC, and benign tissue, including HGPIN. RμS could be a next-generation histopathological technique used to reinforce the identification of high-risk PC patients and lead to more precise diagnosis of IDC-P.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrée-Anne Grosset
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Cellular Biology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Frédérick Dallaire
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Computer Engineering and Software Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Tien Nguyen
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Engineering Physics, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mirela Birlea
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jahg Wong
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - François Daoust
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Engineering Physics, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Noémi Roy
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - André Kougioumoutzakis
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Feryel Azzi
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kelly Aubertin
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Samuel Kadoury
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Computer Engineering and Software Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mathieu Latour
- Department of Pathology and Cellular Biology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Pathology, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Roula Albadine
- Department of Pathology and Cellular Biology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Pathology, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Susan Prendeville
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul Boutros
- Informatics & Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Institute for Precision Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Michael Fraser
- Informatics & Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rob G. Bristow
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Michèle Orain
- Oncology Division, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec–Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hervé Brisson
- Oncology Division, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec–Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nazim Benzerdjeb
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Oncology Division, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec–Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hélène Hovington
- Oncology Division, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec–Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alain Bergeron
- Oncology Division, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec–Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Yves Fradet
- Oncology Division, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec–Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bernard Têtu
- Oncology Division, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec–Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Frédéric Leblond
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Engineering Physics, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Dominique Trudel
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Cellular Biology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Pathology, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rebello RJ, Bristow RG. Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer: Disease Heterogeneity Linked to Measurable Biological Features. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:298-302. [PMID: 32147317 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 10/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- R J Rebello
- Translational Oncogenomics Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester, UK.
| | - R G Bristow
- Translational Oncogenomics Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gillessen S, Attard G, Beer TM, Beltran H, Bjartell A, Bossi A, Briganti A, Bristow RG, Chi KN, Clarke N, Davis ID, de Bono J, Drake CG, Duran I, Eeles R, Efstathiou E, Evans CP, Fanti S, Feng FY, Fizazi K, Frydenberg M, Gleave M, Halabi S, Heidenreich A, Heinrich D, Higano CTS, Hofman MS, Hussain M, James N, Kanesvaran R, Kantoff P, Khauli RB, Leibowitz R, Logothetis C, Maluf F, Millman R, Morgans AK, Morris MJ, Mottet N, Mrabti H, Murphy DG, Murthy V, Oh WK, Ost P, O'Sullivan JM, Padhani AR, Parker C, Poon DMC, Pritchard CC, Reiter RE, Roach M, Rubin M, Ryan CJ, Saad F, Sade JP, Sartor O, Scher HI, Shore N, Small E, Smith M, Soule H, Sternberg CN, Steuber T, Suzuki H, Sweeney C, Sydes MR, Taplin ME, Tombal B, Türkeri L, van Oort I, Zapatero A, Omlin A. Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019. Eur Urol 2020; 77:508-547. [PMID: 32001144 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 257] [Impact Index Per Article: 64.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovations in treatments, imaging, and molecular characterisation in advanced prostate cancer have improved outcomes, but there are still many aspects of management that lack high-level evidence to inform clinical practice. The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2019 addressed some of these topics to supplement guidelines that are based on level 1 evidence. OBJECTIVE To present the results from the APCCC 2019. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Similar to prior conferences, experts identified 10 important areas of controversy regarding the management of advanced prostate cancer: locally advanced disease, biochemical recurrence after local therapy, treating the primary tumour in the metastatic setting, metastatic hormone-sensitive/naïve prostate cancer, nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, bone health and bone metastases, molecular characterisation of tissue and blood, inter- and intrapatient heterogeneity, and adverse effects of hormonal therapy and their management. A panel of 72 international prostate cancer experts developed the programme and the consensus questions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The panel voted publicly but anonymously on 123 predefined questions, which were developed by both voting and nonvoting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Panellists voted based on their opinions rather than a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions had varying degrees of support by the panel, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results reported in the Supplementary material. CONCLUSIONS These voting results from a panel of prostate cancer experts can help clinicians and patients navigate controversial areas of advanced prostate management for which high-level evidence is sparse. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised based on patient-specific factors, such as disease extent and location, prior lines of therapy, comorbidities, and treatment preferences, together with current and emerging clinical evidence and logistic and economic constraints. Clinical trial enrolment for men with advanced prostate cancer should be strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2019 once again identified important questions that merit assessment in specifically designed trials. PATIENT SUMMARY The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference provides a forum to discuss and debate current diagnostic and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. The conference, which has been held three times since 2015, aims to share the knowledge of world experts in prostate cancer management with health care providers worldwide. At the end of the conference, an expert panel discusses and votes on predefined consensus questions that target the most clinically relevant areas of advanced prostate cancer treatment. The results of the voting provide a practical guide to help clinicians discuss therapeutic options with patients as part of shared and multidisciplinary decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Universita della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland; Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Division of Cancer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | | | - Tomasz M Beer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Genito Urinary Oncology, Prostate Brachytherapy Unit, Goustave Roussy, Paris, France
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Rob G Bristow
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Christie NHS Trust, Manchester, UK; CRUK Manchester Institute and Cancer Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Kim N Chi
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Noel Clarke
- The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester, UK
| | - Ian D Davis
- Monash University and Eastern Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Johann de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research/Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK
| | - Charles G Drake
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Ros Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Felix Y Feng
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Karim Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Prostate Cancer Research Program, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department Anatomy & Developmental Biology, Faculty of Nursing, Medicine & Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Martin Gleave
- Urological Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Reconstructive Urology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniel Heinrich
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Celestia Tia S Higano
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Maha Hussain
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | - Philip Kantoff
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Raja B Khauli
- Department of Urology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon; Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute (NKBCI), American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Raya Leibowitz
- Oncology institute, Shamir Medical Center and Faculty of medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Chris Logothetis
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Clinical Therapeutics, David H. Koch Centre, University of Athens Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Fernando Maluf
- Beneficiência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Departamento de Oncologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Alicia K Morgans
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | - Hind Mrabti
- National Institute of Oncology, University hospital, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - William K Oh
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK; Radiotherapy Department, Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Chris Parker
- Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Darren M C Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Mack Roach
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mark Rubin
- Bern Center for Precision Medicine, Bern, Switzerland; Department for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Charles J Ryan
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre Hospitalier de Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | | | - Howard I Scher
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Eric Small
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Howard Soule
- Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Cora N Sternberg
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Steuber
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Christopher Sweeney
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew R Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Levent Türkeri
- Department of Urology, M.A. Aydınlar Acıbadem University, Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Inge van Oort
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital La Princesa, Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Aurelius Omlin
- University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tan Q, Joshua AM, Wang M, Bristow RG, Wouters BG, Allen CJ, Tannock IF. Up-regulation of autophagy is a mechanism of resistance to chemotherapy and can be inhibited by pantoprazole to increase drug sensitivity. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2017; 79:959-969. [PMID: 28378028 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-017-3298-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Accepted: 03/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Autophagy is a survival mechanism that allows recycling of cellular breakdown products, particularly in stressed cells. Here we evaluate the hypotheses that up-regulation of autophagy is a common mechanism of resistance to chemotherapy, and that drug resistance can be reversed by inhibiting autophagy with a proton pump inhibitor. METHODS We exposed human PC3, LNCaP and MCF7 cells to seven clinically-used chemotherapy drugs ± pantoprazole, examined the up-regulation of autophagy and the effect on cellular proliferation by Western Blots, MTS assay and colony-forming assay. The distribution of drug effects and of autophagy was quantified in LNCaP tumor sections in relation to blood vessels and hypoxia by immunohistochemistry using γH2AX, cleaved caspase-3 and p62. RESULTS All anticancer drugs led to up-regulation of autophagy in cultured tumor cells. Pantoprazole inhibited the induction of autophagy in a time- and dose-dependent manner, and sensitized cancer cells to the seven anti-cancer drugs. Treatment of LNCaP xenografts with paclitaxel induced both DNA damage and autophagy; autophagy was inhibited and markers of toxicity were increased by pantoprazole. CONCLUSIONS Induction of autophagy is a general mechanism associated with resistance to anticancer drugs and that its inhibition is a promising therapeutic strategy to enhance the effects of chemotherapy and improve clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Tan
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 9 floor room 417, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G2M9, Canada.
| | - A M Joshua
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - M Wang
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - R G Bristow
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - B G Wouters
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - C J Allen
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ian F Tannock
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 9 floor room 417, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G2M9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fraser ME, van der Kwast T, McPherson J, Collins CC, Fradet Y, Tetu B, Bergeron A, Bristow RG, Boutros PC. Abstract 118: A comprehensive profile of the genomic architecture of curable prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
There is an urgent need to develop novel biomarkers of treatment response for precision medicine in prostate cancer, particularly in the setting of localized, non-indolent disease, which represents the vast majority of cases at initial clinical presentation. The Canadian Prostate Cancer Genome Network (CPC-GENE) - a member of the International Cancer Genome Consortium - aims to identify multi-modal prognostic and predictive signatures of therapeutic outcome based on intrinsic tumour genomics, transcriptomics, and epigenomics, which are being incorporated into novel clinical trials of treatment escalation/de-escalation for image-guided radiotherapy and/or radical prostatectomy. Herein we report the results of the largest prostate cancer whole-genome sequencing study to date, consisting of 194 patients and whole-exome sequencing of 479 patients with localized, potentially curable disease; a sample size that allows for saturating discovery of genes mutated at ≥1% frequency. We show that tumours treated by curative local therapy have a paucity of clinically-actionable mutations relative to high-risk localized or metastatic disease, but instead harbor a significant number of recurrent non-coding aberrations and genomic rearrangements, including a novel inversion - and an associated reduction in gene expression - of the PTEN tumour suppressor gene on chromosome 10. The median tumour contains three distinct driver mutations, with >86% of tumours possessing at least one known driver. Importantly, multiple driver aberrations are associated with patient outcome, including copy number aberrations and methylation events, but notably excluding well-described recurrent events such as TMPRSS2:ERG fusions and SPOP point mutations. Localized hypermutation events (e.g. kataegis) were detected in >20% of tumours, and were strongly enriched for aggressive disease. Taken together, these data provide a comprehensive analysis of the genomic landscape of localized, non-indolent prostate cancer. Moreover, our results strongly suggest that specific molecular aberrations may serve as useful biomarkers for improved pre-treatment stratification of patients with localized, low/intermediate risk disease into escalation/de-escalation protocols, and support the development of clinical trials to assess this hypothesis, based on patient-specific molecular profiles.
Citation Format: Michael E. Fraser, Theodorus van der Kwast, John McPherson, Colin C. Collins, Yves Fradet, Bernard Tetu, Alain Bergeron, Rob G. Bristow, Paul C. Boutros. A comprehensive profile of the genomic architecture of curable prostate cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 118.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - John McPherson
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Colin C. Collins
- 1Univ. of Toronto Ontario Cancer Inst., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yves Fradet
- 3Universite Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | - Rob G. Bristow
- 1Univ. of Toronto Ontario Cancer Inst., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul C. Boutros
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rajan A, Berns A, Ringborg U, Celis J, Ponder B, Caldas C, Livingston D, Bristow RG, Hecht TT, Tursz T, van Luenen H, Bono P, Helander T, Seamon K, Smyth JF, Louvard D, Eggermont A, van Harten WH. Excellent translational research in oncology: A journey towards novel and more effective anti-cancer therapies. Mol Oncol 2016; 10:645-51. [PMID: 26797050 PMCID: PMC5423159 DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2015.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2015] [Revised: 12/06/2015] [Accepted: 12/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Comprehensive Cancer Centres (CCCs) serve as critical drivers for improving cancer survival. In Europe, we have developed an Excellence Designation System (EDS) consisting of criteria to assess "excellence" of CCCs in translational research (bench to bedside and back), with the expectation that many European CCCs will aspire to this status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Rajan
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands
| | - A Berns
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands
| | | | - J Celis
- Danish Cancer Society, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | - T T Hecht
- Translational Research Program, National Cancer Institute, USA
| | - T Tursz
- Institut Gustave Roussy, France
| | - H van Luenen
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands
| | - P Bono
- Helsinki University Central Hospital Cancer Center, Finland
| | - T Helander
- Helsinki University Central Hospital Cancer Center, Finland
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Boström PJ, Thoms J, Sykes J, Ahmed O, Evans A, van Rhijn BWG, Mirtti T, Stakhovskyi O, Laato M, Margel D, Pintilie M, Kuk C, Milosevic M, Zlotta AR, Bristow RG. Hypoxia Marker GLUT-1 (Glucose Transporter 1) is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Survival in Bladder Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Cystectomy. Bladder Cancer 2016; 2:101-109. [PMID: 27376131 PMCID: PMC4927886 DOI: 10.3233/blc-150033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumour hypoxia, which is frequent in many cancer types, is associated with treatment resistance and poor prognosis. The role of hypoxia in surgically treated bladder cancer (BC) is not well described. We studied the role of hypoxia in two independent series of urothelial bladder cancers treated with radical cystectomy. METHODS 279 patients from the University Hospital Network (UHN), Toronto, Canada, and Turku University, Finland were studied. Hypoxia biomarkers (HIF1-α, CAIX, GLUT-1) and proliferation marker Ki-67 were analyzed with immunohistochemistry using defined tissue microarrays. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to investigate prognostic role of the factors. RESULTS In univariate analyses, strong GLUT-1 positivity and a high Ki-67 index were associated with poor survival. In multivariate model containing clinical prognostic variables, GLUT-1 was an independent prognostic factor associated with worse disease-specific survival (HR 2.9, 95% CI 0.7-12.6, Wald p = 0.15 in the Toronto cohort and HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.3-7.5, Wald p = 0.0085 in the Turku cohort). CONCLUSION GLUT-1 is frequently upregulated and is an independent prognostic factor in surgically treated bladder cancer. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potential role of hypoxia-based and targeted therapies in hypoxic bladder tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P J Boström
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Hospital (University Health Network), Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - J Thoms
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Hospital (University Health Network) , Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - J Sykes
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Hospital (University Health Network) , Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - O Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Hospital (University Health Network) , Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - A Evans
- Department of Pathology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Hospital (University Health Network) , Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - B W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Hospital (University Health Network) , Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - T Mirtti
- Department of Pathology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Institute for Molecular Medicine (FIMM), Helsinki, Finland
| | - O Stakhovskyi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Hospital (University Health Network) , Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M Laato
- Department of Urology, Turku University Hospital , Turku, Finland
| | - D Margel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Hospital (University Health Network) , Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M Pintilie
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Hospital (University Health Network) , Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - C Kuk
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Hospital (University Health Network) , Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M Milosevic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Hospital (University Health Network) , Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - A R Zlotta
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Hospital (University Health Network) , Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - R G Bristow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Hospital (University Health Network) , Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Berlin A, Dal Pra A, Bristow RG. Pre-radiotherapy identification of individual genomic profile to avoid, by resort to customized radiosensitizers, the risk of radioresistance development in patients with localized prostate cancer: author reply. Br J Radiol 2015; 88:20140701. [DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
16
|
Bristow RG, Berlin A, Dal Pra A. An arranged marriage for precision medicine: hypoxia and genomic assays in localized prostate cancer radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 2014; 87:20130753. [PMID: 24588670 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (CaP) is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in males in the Western world with one in six males diagnosed in their lifetime. Current clinical prognostication groupings use pathologic Gleason score, pre-treatment prostatic-specific antigen and Union for International Cancer Control-TNM staging to place patients with localized CaP into low-, intermediate- and high-risk categories. These categories represent an increasing risk of biochemical failure and CaP-specific mortality rates, they also reflect the need for increasing treatment intensity and justification for increased side effects. In this article, we point out that 30-50% of patients will still fail image-guided radiotherapy or surgery despite the judicious use of clinical risk categories owing to interpatient heterogeneity in treatment response. To improve treatment individualization, better predictors of prognosis and radiotherapy treatment response are needed to triage patients to bespoke and intensified CaP treatment protocols. These should include the use of pre-treatment genomic tests based on DNA or RNA indices and/or assays that reflect cancer metabolism, such as hypoxia assays, to define patient-specific CaP progression and aggression. More importantly, it is argued that these novel prognostic assays could be even more useful if combined together to drive forward precision cancer medicine for localized CaP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R G Bristow
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center (University Health Network), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fraser ME, de Borja R, Trudel D, Harding NJ, Hennings-Yeomans PH, Meng A, Lalonde ER, Brown A, Fox NS, Chong T, Zia A, Sam M, Wang J, Chan-Seng-Yue MA, Johns J, Timms L, Buchner N, Wong A, Yousif F, Denroche R, Zafarana G, Starmans MHW, Chen H, Govind S, Nguyen F, Pintilie M, Fleshner N, Volik S, Muthuswamy L, Collins CC, Hudson TJ, Stein LD, Beck T, McPherson JD, van der Kwast T, Boutros PC, Bristow RG. Abstract 2003: A molecular portrait of potentially curable prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-2003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Intermediate risk prostate cancer (CaP) with Gleason score (GS) of 7 show up to 100x variability in genetic instability. As CaP is multifocal and likely multiclonal, there is a need to characterize heterogeneity for patient stratification, which would increase the ability to act on genomic information by adding adjuvant therapies to offset systemic occult metastases that currently limit cure in ∼30% of patients. Individual genetic portraits could be used to improve cure on combined clinical-molecular staging criteria.
We undertook a pilot study to assess the genetic heterogeneity of potentially curable GS=7 CaP. We selected 10 men with GS=7 CaP; 5 treated with external beam radiotherapy (frozen pre-treatment biopsies) and 5 treated with radical prostatectomy (RadP, frozen tumour). Additionally, DNA from 18 distinct formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) foci from the 5 RadP were analysed. Each of these 28 foci were subjected to whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and OncoScan SNP arrays to yield comprehensive genetic profiles. mRNA expression was evaluated on frozen RadP by microarray. Germline DNA from whole-blood was also analysed.
Following independent pathology reviews and manual macro-dissection of tumour areas of ≥70% cellularity, WGS (≥50x tumour, ≥30x germline) was performed on as little as 50 ng genomic DNA, and OncoScan arrays were performed using as little as 30ng DNA using either amplified or innate genomic DNA. Regions of CaP in FFPE RadP were recorded using a tissue map to identify independent malignant foci, and ERG immunostaining was performed to assist in the identification. In cases where ERG-positive and -negative foci were adjacent, ERG staining was repeated on an un-stained slide to confirm separate foci based on 3D multi-section analyses. ERG fusion status was also assessed in frozen samples by aCGH or IHC.
Validation of SNVs via SNP array and deep-resequencing showed ∼99% accuracy. Tumour cellularity was estimated using Qpure and was >60% for all samples. Phylogenetic techniques were used to demonstrate clear multi-clonality in two tumours. Across all tumours, ∼50% of SNVs were specific to an individual tumour-region. Phylogenies were confirmed with both SNVs and CNAs, but CNAs generally exhibited greater concordance amongst different regions of the same tumour. Some previously observed recurrent mutations were previously identified as recurrent in CaP (e.g. SPOP), and the overall mutation rate for intermediate-risk CaP was only somewhat below that reported for castrate-resistant disease (11,230 somatic SNVs per tumour).
Our studies support the concept that a complete characterization of inter- and intra-CaP heterogeneity is possible in fresh and archival tissues; the latter is important for correlations to clinical outcome. These approaches can then be streamlined for high-throughput analyses within personalized medicine laboratories leading to “point of care” molecular tests and individualization of therapy.
Citation Format: Michael E. Fraser, Richard de Borja, Dominique Trudel, Nicholas J. Harding, Pablo H. Hennings-Yeomans, Alice Meng, Emilie R. Lalonde, Andrew Brown, Natalie S. Fox, Taryne Chong, Amin Zia, Michelle Sam, Jianxin Wang, Michelle A. Chan-Seng-Yue, Jeremy Johns, Lee Timms, Nicholas Buchner, Ada Wong, Fouad Yousif, Rob Denroche, Gaetano Zafarana, Maud HW Starmans, Hanbert Chen, Shaylan Govind, Francis Nguyen, Melania Pintilie, Neil Fleshner, Stanislav Volik, Lakshmi Muthuswamy, Colin C. Collins, Thomas J. Hudson, Lincoln D. Stein, Timothy Beck, John D. McPherson, Theodorus van der Kwast, Paul C. Boutros, Rob G. Bristow. A molecular portrait of potentially curable prostate cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2003. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-2003
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Richard de Borja
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Alice Meng
- 4STTARR Innovation Program, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Andrew Brown
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Natalie S. Fox
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Taryne Chong
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amin Zia
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle Sam
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jianxin Wang
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Jeremy Johns
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lee Timms
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicholas Buchner
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ada Wong
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fouad Yousif
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rob Denroche
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Maud HW Starmans
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hanbert Chen
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shaylan Govind
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Francis Nguyen
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melania Pintilie
- 1Univ. of Toronto Ontario Cancer Inst., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Neil Fleshner
- 3University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stanislav Volik
- 5Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Thomas J. Hudson
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lincoln D. Stein
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Timothy Beck
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Paul C. Boutros
- 2Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rob G. Bristow
- 1Univ. of Toronto Ontario Cancer Inst., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Thoms JW, Dal Pra A, Anborgh PH, Christensen E, Fleshner N, Menard C, Chadwick K, Milosevic M, Catton C, Pintilie M, Chambers AF, Bristow RG. Plasma osteopontin as a biomarker of prostate cancer aggression: relationship to risk category and treatment response. Br J Cancer 2012; 107:840-6. [PMID: 22871886 PMCID: PMC3425969 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High plasma osteopontin (OPN) has been linked to tumour hypoxia, metastasis, and poor prognosis. This study aims to assess whether plasma osteopontin was a biomarker of increasing progression within prostate cancer (PCa) prognostic groups and whether it reflected treatment response to local and systemic therapies. METHODS Baseline OPN was determined in men with localised (n=199), locally recurrent (n=9) and castrate-resistant, metastatic PCa (CRPC-MET; n=37). Receiver-operating curves (ROC) were generated to describe the accuracy of OPN for distinguishing between localised risk groups or localised vs metastatic disease. We also measured OPN pre- and posttreatment, following radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), androgen deprivation (AD) or taxane-based chemotherapy. RESULTS The CRPC-MET patients had increased baseline values (mean 219; 56-513 ng ml(-1); P<0.0001) compared with the localised, non-metastatic group (mean 72; 12-438 ng ml(-1)). The area under the ROC to differentiate localised vs metastatic disease was improved when OPN was added to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (0.943-0.969). Osteopontin neither distinguished high-risk PCa from other localised PCa nor correlated with serum PSA at baseline. Osteopontin levels reduced in low-risk patients after radical prostatectomy (P=0.005) and in CRPC-MET patients after chemotherapy (P=0.027), but not after EBRT or AD. CONCLUSION Plasma OPN is as good as PSA at predicting treatment response in CRPC-MET patients after chemotherapy. Our data do not support the use of plasma OPN as a biomarker of increasing tumour burden within localised PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J W Thoms
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Surgery and Biostatistics, University of Toronto and Ontario Cancer Institute/Princess Margaret Hospital (University Health Network), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Van der Kwast T, Al Daoud N, Collette L, Sykes J, Thoms J, Milosevic M, Bristow RG, Van Tienhoven G, Warde P, Mirimanoff RO, Bolla M. Biopsy diagnosis of intraductal carcinoma is prognostic in intermediate and high risk prostate cancer patients treated by radiotherapy. Eur J Cancer 2012; 48:1318-25. [PMID: 22405699 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2011] [Revised: 02/07/2012] [Accepted: 02/09/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM We investigated the prognostic significance of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) in biopsies and transurethral resections prior to external beam radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation. METHODS Cohort 1 consisted of 118 intermediate risk prostate cancer patients treated by radiotherapy, with biochemical relapse as primary end-point (median follow-up 6.5 years). Cohort 2 consisted of 132 high risk patients, enrolled in a phase III randomised trial (EORTC 22863) comparing radiotherapy alone to radiotherapy with long-term androgen deprivation (LTAD) with clinical progression free survival as primary end-point (median follow-up 9.1 years). Presence of IDC-P was identified after central review. Multivariable regression modelling and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed with IDC-P as dichotomous variable. RESULTS IDC-P was a strong prognosticator for early (<36 months) biochemical relapse (HR 7.3; p = 0.007) in cohort 1 and for clinical disease-free survival in both arms of cohort 2 (radiotherapy arm: HR 3.5; p < 0.0001; radiotherapy plus LTAD arm: HR 2.8, p = 0.018). IDC-P retained significance after stratification for reviewed Gleason score in the radiotherapy arm (HR 2.3; p = 0.03). IDC-P was a strong prognosticator for metastatic failure rate (radiotherapy arm: HR 5.3; p < 0.0001; radiotherapy plus LTAD arm: HR 3.6; p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS IDC-P in diagnostic samples of patients with intermediate or high risk prostate cancer is an independent prognosticator of early biochemical relapse and metastatic failure rate after radiotherapy. We suggest that the presence of IDC-P in prostate biopsies should routinely be reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Van der Kwast
- Dept of Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tabassum A, Bristow RG, Venkateswaran V. Ingestion of selenium and other antioxidants during prostate cancer radiotherapy: A good thing? Cancer Treat Rev 2010; 36:230-4. [PMID: 20079573 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2009] [Revised: 12/07/2009] [Accepted: 12/09/2009] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A Tabassum
- Molecular and Cellular Biology, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N 3M5.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a heritable disorder of the connective tissue which has been linked to mutations in the FBN (fibrillin-1) gene. Murine knockouts of the FBN gene show increased interstitial fibrosis and TGF-beta (tumor growth factor-beta) gene activation. Abnormal TGF-beta expression has previously been linked to radiation-induced fibrosis, suggesting a possible link between MFS and increased late effects following radiotherapy. Herein we report two cases in which MFS patients treated with radical radiotherapy without undue acute or late radiotherapy toxicity suggesting that radiotherapy should not be withheld from MFS patients. MFS patients may provide a unique clinico-translational setting to test associations between FBN mutations, TGF-beta activation and the risk of tissue fibrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Finlay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital (University Health Network) and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bromfield GP, Meng A, Warde P, Bristow RG. Cell death in irradiated prostate epithelial cells: role of apoptotic and clonogenic cell kill. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2003; 6:73-85. [PMID: 12664070 DOI: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2002] [Revised: 07/25/2002] [Accepted: 08/07/2002] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Dose-escalated conformal radiotherapy is increasingly being used to radically treat prostate cancer with encouraging results and minimal long-term toxicity, yet little is known regarding the response of normal or malignant prostate cells to ionizing radiation (IR). To clarify the basis for cell killing during prostate cancer radiotherapy, we determined the IR-induced expression of several apoptotic- (bax, bcl-2, survivin and PARP) and G1-cell cycle checkpoint- (p53 and p21(WAF1/Cip1)) related proteins, in both normal (PrEC-epithelial and PrSC-stromal) and malignant (LNCaP, DU-145 and PC-3; all epithelial) prostate cells. For these experiments, we chose doses ranging from 2 to 10 Gy, to be representative of the 1.8-2 Gy daily clinical fractions given during curative radiotherapy and the 8-10 Gy single doses given in palliative radiotherapy. We observed that IR-induced bax and p21(WAF1/Cip1) protein expression were attenuated selectively in normal stromal and epithelial cell cultures, yet maintained their p53-dependency in malignant cell lines. For each cell culture, we also determined total apoptotic and overall radiation cell kill using a short-term nuclear morphologic assay and a long-term clonogenic survival assay, respectively. Clonogenic survival, as measured by the surviving fraction at 2 Gy (SF2), ranged from 0.05 (PrEC) to 0.55 (DU-145), suggesting that malignant prostate cells are more radioresistant than normal prostate cells, for this series. IR-induced apoptotic cell kill was minimal (less than 6% cell after a dose of 10 Gy at times of 24-96 h) and was not dose-dependent. Furthermore, apoptotic kill was not correlated with either molecular apoptotic response or clonogenic cell kill. Using a flow cytometric proliferation assay with the PrSC (stromal) and DU-145 (epithelial) representative cultures, we observed that a senescent-like phenotype (SLP) emerges within a sub-population of cells post-irradiation that is non-clonogenic. Terminal growth arrest was dose-responsive at 96 h following irradiation and associated with long-term expression of both p21(WAF1/Cip1) and p16(INK4a) genes. Future strategies for prostate radiotherapy prediction or novel treatments should additionally focus on terminal growth arrest as an important endpoint in prostate cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G P Bromfield
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Vella C, Zheng NN, Vella G, Atkins C, Bristow RG, Fickenscher H, Daniels RS. Enhanced replication of M-tropic HIV-1 strains in Herpesvirus saimiri immortalised T-cells which express CCR5. J Virol Methods 1999; 79:51-63. [PMID: 10328535 DOI: 10.1016/s0166-0934(99)00006-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
A better characterisation of mononuclear cell-tropic (M-tropic) HIV-1 is central to disease control as these viruses predominate in disease transmission. M-tropic viruses do not replicate in conventional T-cell lines, and virus titres obtained in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) are low. Human T-lymphocytes which have been immortalised by Herpesvirus saimiri strain C488 (HVS T-cells) are highly permissive to the replication of T-cell tropic strains of HIV. This study aimed to determine if HVS T-cells support replication of M-tropic HIV isolates that have not been adapted to conventional T-cell lines. A panel of PBMC low passage/primary field isolates and their molecular clones was used. Results show that infection in HVS T-cells was longer lived than in PBMC. In terms of peak virus titre and duration of productive infection, the two HVS T-cell lines studied were superior to PBMC, and one supported enhanced replication of all M-tropic isolates. This is important for generating M-tropic virus pools of sufficient titre for further biological studies such as virus neutralisation, co receptor usage and testing of antivirals. Phenotypic analysis showed that HVS T-cells are CD4+-activated memory cells expressing both CXCR-4 and CCR5 co receptors. Thus, HVS immortalisation appears to select for the T-cell subset targeted by HIV-1 in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Vella
- The National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Warde P, O'Sullivan B, Bristow RG, Panzarella T, Keane TJ, Gullane PJ, Witterick IP, Payne D, Liu FF, McLean M, Waldron J, Cummings BJ. T1/T2 glottic cancer managed by external beam radiotherapy: the influence of pretreatment hemoglobin on local control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 41:347-53. [PMID: 9607350 DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00062-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pretreatment hemoglobin (Hb) level has been reported to be an important prognostic factor for local control and survival in various malignancies. However, in many settings, the adverse effect of a low Hb may be related to more advanced disease. The purpose of this analysis was to assess the influence of pretreatment Hb on local control in a large series of patients with a localized cancer (T1/T2 glottic cancer, AJCC 1992) treated in a standard fashion. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between January 1981 and December 1989, 735 patients (median age 63; 657 males, 78 females) with T1/T2 glottic cancer were treated with radiation therapy (RT). The standard RT prescription was 50 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks (97% of patients). Factors studied for prognostic importance for local failure included pretreatment Hb, age, sex, T category, anterior commissure involvement, subglottic extension, and tumor bulk (presence of visible tumor vs. subclinical disease). RESULTS With a median follow-up of 6.8 years (range 0.2-14.3), 131 patients have locally relapsed for an actuarial 5-year relapse-free rate of 81.7%. The 5-year actuarial survival was 75.8%. The mean pretreatment hemoglobin level was 14.8 g/dl and was similar in all prognostic categories. On multivariate analysis, using the Cox proportional hazards model, pretreatment Hb predicted for local failure after RT. The hazard ratio (HR) for relapse was calculated for various Hb levels. For example, the HR for a Hb of 12 g/dl vs. a Hb of 15 g/dl was 1.8 (95% confidence interval 1.2-2.5). Previously established factors, including gender, T category, subglottic extension, as well as tumor bulk, were also prognostically important for local control. CONCLUSIONS This analysis, in a large number of similarly treated patients, indicates that pretreatment Hb is an independent prognostic factor for local control in patients with T1/T2 carcinoma of the glottis treated with RT. The underlying biology of this observation needs to be explored, and using this information, it may be possible to develop strategies to improve treatment outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Warde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital/University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bristow RG, Hu Q, Jang A, Chung S, Peacock J, Benchimol S, Hill R. Radioresistant MTp53-expressing rat embryo cell transformants exhibit increased DNA-dsb rejoining during exposure to ionizing radiation. Oncogene 1998; 16:1789-802. [PMID: 9583677 DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Recent data suggest that aberrant function of the wild type p53 protein (WTp53) may alter cellular survival following DNA damage through cellular pathways involving apoptosis and cell-cycle checkpoints, but little is known concerning it's possible role in DNA repair. In the present study, the ionizing radiation sensitivity was determined for a series of rat embryo fibroblast (REF) cell lines transfected with an activated form of the H-ras oncogene alone, or in combination with a variety of missense-mutant p53 (MTp53) alleles. Transformed REF clones which expressed exogenous MTp53 and p21ras proteins (CLASS II clones) were generally radioresistant in culture as determined by higher values for the surviving fraction after 2 Gy (SF2 value) and the radiation dose required to reduce survival to a fraction of 0.1 (D10 value), compared either to transformed REF clones expressing p21ras protein alone (CLASS I clones), or to non-transfected REF control cell lines expressing baseline endogenous levels of p21ras and WTp53 protein. The increased radioresistance observed in the CLASS II clones (following both HDR- and LDR-irradiation), was significantly correlated with increased expression of MTp53 protein, and a decreased radiation-induced G1 arrest response. The variability observed in clonogenic radiosensitivity among REF clones was not explained by differential radiation-induced apoptosis. Using the Comet assay performed after continuous low dose-rate (LDR)-irradiation, MTp53-expressing REF clones were also found to be more proficient at the rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks (DNA-dsb), compared to WTp53-expressing REF clones. These results suggest that an enhanced DNA and cellular repair capacity may, in part, explain the increased radiation survival observed in some MTp53-expressing transformed fibroblasts and tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R G Bristow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, The Ontario Cancer Institute/The Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Reitmair AH, Risley R, Bristow RG, Wilson T, Ganesh A, Jang A, Peacock J, Benchimol S, Hill RP, Mak TW, Fishel R, Meuth M. Mutator phenotype in Msh2-deficient murine embryonic fibroblasts. Cancer Res 1997; 57:3765-71. [PMID: 9288785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Embryonic fibroblast cell lines were established from mice deficient, heterozygous, or proficient for Msh2, one of the three known DNA mismatch repair genes involved in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). Cell lines were established by transfection of primary mouse embryo fibroblasts with E7 and Ras oncogenes or mutant p53. Spontaneously immortalized cells derived from the primary cultures were also studied. To determine whether these cells developed a mutator phenotype similar to that found in colon cancer cells deficient in mismatch repair, we measured mutation rates, microsatellite instability, and sensitivities to a range of DNA-damaging agents. The mutator phenotype detected in the E7 and Ras or mutant p53-immortalized Msh2-/- mouse cells was similar to that found in human mismatch repair-deficient colorectal carcinoma cell lines. Mutation rates to ouabain resistance were increased 8-12-fold relative to lines from Msh2+/+ mice, and microsatellite instability was detectable in 12-18% of subclones derived from the Msh2-/- line but was undetectable in subclones developed from the Msh2+/+ line. Furthermore, E7 and Ras or spontaneously immortalized Msh2-/- cells were significantly more resistant to the cytotoxic effects of 6-thioguanine relative to Msh2+/+ cells. In contrast, these lines showed various responses to UV light and cis-platinum, suggesting that mismatch repair deficiency was not the sole determinant for sensitivity to these DNA-damaging agents. Particular attention was paid to the properties of cells heterozygous for the Msh2 mutant gene, which would mimic the situation of an HNPCC carrier. However, our studies failed to reveal any properties of these cells that might provide a growth advantage or predispose them for the acquisition of further mutations. This observation is consistent with the model that inactivation of the wild-type Msh2 allele is a critical step for tumorigenesis in HNPCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A H Reitmair
- Ontario Cancer Institute/Amgen Institute, Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bristow RG, Laperriere NJ, Tator C, Milosevic M, Wong CS. Post-operative radiotherapy for recurrent dermoid cysts of the spine: a report of 3 cases. J Neurooncol 1997; 33:251-6. [PMID: 9195496 DOI: 10.1023/a:1005739606895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
We report three cases of recurrent, intraspinal dermoid cysts managed with post-operative radical radiotherapy. In all cases, the period between last surgery and cystic re-accumulation has been lengthened by the use of involved-field radiotherapy. This combined-modality approach could be beneficial in decreasing the probability of recurrence associated with incompletely-resected tumours, or in patients whose co-morbidities put them at increased operative risk for serial neurosurgical procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R G Bristow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Experimental studies have implicated the normal or "wild type' p53 protein (i.e. WTp53) in the cellular response to ionizing radiation and other DNA damaging agents. Whether altered WTp53 protein function can lead to changes in cellular radiosensitivity and/or clinical radiocurability remains an area of ongoing study. In this review, we describe the potential implications of altered WTp53 protein function in normal and tumour cells as it relates to clinical radiotherapy, and describe novel treatment strategies designed to re-institute WTp53 protein function as a means of sensitizing cells to ionizing radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS A number of experimental and clinical studies are critically reviewed with respect to the role of the p53 protein as a determinant of cellular oncogenesis, genomic stability, apoptosis, DNA repair and radioresponse in normal and transformed mammalian cells. RESULTS In normal fibroblasts, exposure to ionizing radiation leads to a G1 cell cycle delay (i.e. a "G1 checkpoint') as a result of WTp53 mediated inhibition of G1-cyclin-kinase and retinoblastoma (pRb) protein function. The G1 checkpoint response is absent in tumour cells which express a mutant form of the p53 protein (i.e. MTp53), leading to acquired radioresistance in vitro. Depending on the cell type studied, this increase in cellular radiation survival can be mediated through decreased radiation-induced apoptosis, or altered kinetics of the radiation-induced G1 checkpoint. Recent biochemical studies support an indirect role for the p53 protein in both nucleotide excision and recombinational DNA repair pathways. However, based on clinicopathologic data, it remains unclear as to whether WTp53 protein function can predict for human tumour radiocurability and normal tissue radioresponse. CONCLUSIONS Alterations in cell cycle control secondary to aberrant WTp53 protein function may be clinically significant if they lead to the acquisition of mutant cellular phenotypes, including the radioresistant phenotype. Pre-clinical studies suggest that these phenotypes may be reversed using adenovirus-mediated gene therapy or pharmacologic strategies designed to re-institute WTp53 protein function. Our analysis of the published data strongly argues for the use of functional assays for the determination of WTp53 protein function in studies which attempt to correlate normal and tumour tissue radioresponse with p53 genotype, or p53 protein expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R G Bristow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
|
30
|
Bristow RG, Brail L, Jang A, Peacock J, Chung S, Benchimol S, Hill RP. P53-mediated radioresistance does not correlate with metastatic potential in tumorigenic rat embryo cell lines following oncogene transfection. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996; 34:341-55. [PMID: 8567335 DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)02023-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Changes in wild-type p53 protein function occur in the majority of human tumors, and may alter genomic stability and the cellular response to ionizing radiation. Whether oncoproteins can render tumor cells both radioresistant and metastatic, may have implications for clinical strategies designed to improve local tumor control. In the studies reported here, we tested the hypothesis that acquired radioresistance correlates with metastatic potential within a large panel of transformed rat embryo cell (REF) lines following transfection with activated H-ras, mutant p53, and HPV16-E7 alleles. METHODS AND MATERIALS Rat embryo cells (REF cells) were transfected using the calcium-phosphate technique with an activated H-ras gene alone, or in combination with human papillomavirus HPV16-E7 and/or human or murine mutant p53 sequences. Other rat embryo cell clones expressing transfected HPV-E7 and activated ras sequences subsequently acquired endogenous p53 gene mutations during culture in vitro. The relative expression of p21ras and p53 protein for each REF transformant was determined by Western blot analysis following transfection. REF clones were phenotypically characterized at early passage (i.e., passages 5-7) and late passage (i.e., passages 10-20) for their: (a) relative tumor growth rate, and (b) their ability to undergo spontaneous metastasis following intramuscular injection into the hind legs of SCID mice. In vivo phenotypic end points were then compared to previously measured parameters of in vitro radiosensitivity for each cell line. Additionally, the expression of the cellular protease, plasminogen activator, was determined for a number of metastatic and nonmetastatic cell lines. RESULTS We found no evidence that selected oncogene-transfected REF transformants that were radioresistant in culture had a greater spontaneous metastatic potential than nonradioresistant REF transformants. Neither the level of expression of the p21ras protein nor that of the p53 protein was correlated with the spontaneous metastatic phenotype when tested at early passage. The metastatic phenotype appeared to be independent of p53 genotype. The majority of metastatic REF clones tested (7 out of 9 clones) expressed plasminogen activator following oncogene transfection, in contrast to nonmetastatic REF transformed cell lines. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that (a) intrinsic radioresistance does not correlate with spontaneous metastatic potential in oncogene-expressing REF transformant cell lines, and (b), novel clinical strategies designed to overcome oncogene-mediated radioresistance could potentially impact on overall survival, as gains in local tumor control may not be offset by a greater risk of distant metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R G Bristow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ontario Cancer Institute/Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Peacock JW, Chung S, Bristow RG, Hill RP, Benchimol S. The p53-mediated G1 checkpoint is retained in tumorigenic rat embryo fibroblast clones transformed by the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 gene and EJ-ras. Mol Cell Biol 1995; 15:1446-54. [PMID: 7862138 PMCID: PMC230369 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.15.3.1446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Rat embryo fibroblast clones transformed with the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 gene and the H-ras oncogene (ER clones) fall into two groups on the basis of endogenous p53 genotype, wild type or mutant. We have compared these clones with the aim of indentifying physiological differences that could be attributed to p53 protein function. We show that all ER clones, regardless of p53 gene status, are tumorigenic and metastatic in severe combined immunodeficiency mice. We demonstrate that only the wild-type p53 protein expressed in ER clones is functional on the basis of its site-specific double-stranded DNA-binding activity and its ability to confer a G1 delay on cells following treatment with ionizing radiation. These data indicate that disruption of the p53 growth-regulatory pathway is not a prerequisite for the malignant conversion of rat embryo fibroblasts expressing the E7 gene and mutant ras. Differences in phenotype that were correlated with loss of p53 protein function included the following: serum-independent growth of ER clones in culture, decreased tumor doubling time in vivo, and increased radioresistance. In addition, we demonstrate the p53-dependent G1 checkpoint alone does not determine radiosensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J W Peacock
- Ontario Cancer Institute/Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bristow RG, Douglas AR, Skehel JJ, Daniels RS. Analysis of murine antibody responses to baculovirus-expressed human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoproteins. J Gen Virol 1994; 75 ( Pt 8):2089-95. [PMID: 7519249 DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-75-8-2089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
An analysis of the humoral immunogenicity of a candidate AIDS vaccine (VaxSyn) in a murine model system is presented. Sera taken from a panel of mice immunized with the immunogen were analysed for their ability to bind a panel of gp120-representing peptides and limited reactivity to known sites of immunological interest was observed. Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) were characterized as binding to a more restricted variety of regions on gp120 including C1, V2, V4 and the C terminus. A tetrazolium-based cytocidicity assay was used and shown to be an effective and objective method for the screening of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-neutralizing activity in large numbers of samples. None of the MAbs characterized in this study neutralize HIV-1 reference strains. The significance of these findings in view of previous publications is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R G Bristow
- Virology Division, National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London, U.K
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bristow RG, Jang A, Peacock J, Chung S, Benchimol S, Hill RP. Mutant p53 increases radioresistance in rat embryo fibroblasts simultaneously transfected with HPV16-E7 and/or activated H-ras. Oncogene 1994; 9:1527-36. [PMID: 8183546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Recently, it has been suggested that abrogation of the wild type p53 protein function may alter the cellular response to DNA damaging agents, including ionizing radiation. This study was designed to compre the relative radiosensitivity and tumorigenicity of rat embryo fibroblast (REF) cell lines transfected with a mutant form of the p53 gene (plasmid MTp53pro193), alone, or in combination, with the H-ras (plasmid pEJ6.6) and HPV16-E7 (plasmid pJ4 omega 16.E7) oncogenes. Transfection of the mutant p53pro193 gene alone resulted in selected clones having increased radioresistance in culture which correlated with increased mutant p53 expression in these clones. However, the co-transfection of mutant p53 and H-ras genes or triple transfection of mutant p53, H-ras and E7 genes resulted in clones with high mutant p53 expression, significantly increased radioresistance and uniform tumorigenicity. There was no correlation between intrinsic radioresistance and spontaneous metastasis in the tumorigenic REF transfectant clones. Stepwise acquisition of radioresistance and an aggressive tumor cell phenotype is observed when the mutant p53 gene and HPV E7 co-operate with the ras oncogene in transfection assays, and can be correlated to increases in mutant p53 expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R G Bristow
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Research (Division of Experimental Therapeutics, Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Transfected oncogenes have been reported to increase the radioresistance of rodent cells. Whether transfected nononcogenic DNA sequences and subsequent clonal selection can result in radioresistant cell populations is unknown. The present set of experiments describe the in vitro radiosensitivity and tumorigenicity of selected clones of primary rat embryo cells and human glioblastoma cells, after transfection with a neomycin-resistance marker (pSV2neo or pCMVneo) and clonal selection. Radiobiological data comparing the surviving fraction at 2 Gy (SF2) and the mean inactivation dose show the induction of radioresistance in two rat embryo cell clones and one glioblastoma clone, as compared to untransfected cells. Wild-type and transfectant clones were injected into three strains of immune-deficient mice (scid, NIH, and nu/nu) to assay for tumorigenicity and metastatic potential. Only the glioblastoma parent line and its transfectant clones were tumorigenic. None of the cells produced spontaneous or experimentally induced metastases. Flow cytometric analyses indicated that the induction of radioresistance could not be attributed to changes in cell kinetics at the time of irradiation. Our results show that transfection of a neomycin-resistance marker and clonal selection can impart radioresistance on both normal and tumor cells. The work also indicates that altered radiation sensitivity does not necessarily correlate with changes in cell-cycle kinetics at the time of irradiation, tumorigenicity, or altered metastatic potential. Our findings have critical implications for transfection studies investigating determinants of cellular radiosensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F S Pardo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bristow RG, Hill RP. Comparison between in vitro radiosensitivity and in vivo radioresponse in murine tumor cell lines. II: In vivo radioresponse following fractionated treatment and in vitro/in vivo correlations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990; 18:331-45. [PMID: 2303364 DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(90)90098-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Survival in the low-dose region of in vitro radiation survival curves for human tumor cell lines may be correlated with the expected clinical radiocurability of tumors of similar histopathological type. The present investigation examined this hypothesis using a series of transplantable murine solid tumors. The in vivo radioresponse of the tumors following fractionated dose (10 fractions of 2 Gy given at 4 hr intervals) and single dose (20 Gy) radiation treatment was measured by growth delay and tumor cell survival assays. The measurements of tumor cell survival were initiated either immediately or 8 hr after the end of radiation treatment. There was no evidence for repair of potentially lethal damage in vivo in any of the tumors. The measurements of in vivo response were compared to parameters of in vitro radiation survival curves for the same tumor cell lines, which were measured concurrently. The tumor cell survival following 10 fractions of 2 Gy correlated best with the measured in vitro survival at 2 Gy, although good correlations were also observed with two parameters calculated from the in vitro data; the value of alpha from fitting the linear-quadratic (LQ) model and the mean inactivation dose (MID). Correlations were also observed between specific growth delay measured in vivo following 10 fractions of 2 Gy and these in vitro parameters. Despite the correlations observed, the measured survival values following 10 fractions of 2 Gy in vivo did not agree quantitatively with the theoretical values predicted from the in vitro survival data assuming equal effect for each fraction. This discrepancy indicates that other factors also contribute to the overall response of a tumor to fractionated irradiation. Nevertheless, these findings support the idea that intrinsic radiosensitivity plays a significant role in determining the overall response of a tumor to fractionated irradiation and provides strong support for the concept of testing the in vitro radiation sensitivity of biopsy specimens as a predictive assay of clinical radiocurability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R G Bristow
- Physics Division, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bristow RG, Hardy PA, Hill RP. Comparison between in vitro radiosensitivity and in vivo radioresponse of murine tumor cell lines. I: Parameters of in vitro radiosensitivity and endogenous cellular glutathione levels. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990; 18:133-45. [PMID: 2298617 DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(90)90277-q] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Recent studies have suggested that differences in the initial low-dose region of the radiation survival curves for human tumor cells might explain the differences in clinical response of tumors to fractionated radiation treatment. In this study, which is described in two companion papers, we investigated this hypothesis directly using animal model systems. In the present paper we determined in vitro radiation survival curves for eight murine tumor cell lines of varying histopathological type and: (a) measured survival at the 2 Gy and 8 Gy dose levels, (b) fitted parameters to the linear quadratic and two component multi-target equation models of cellular survival and (c) calculated mean inactivation doses. We found that the choice of the data fitting procedure affected the absolute value, relative ranking, and power to discriminate between the cell lines of these calculated parameters. A detailed statistical study indicated that the measured surviving fraction at 2 Gy (SF2) was the best discriminant of intrinsic radiosensitivity between the eight tumor cell lines. When these same cell lines were assayed for intracellular glutathione (GSH) levels, no correlation was found between levels of GSH and the SF2 value. Determining the SF2 value may be the method of choice to describe the low-dose region of the radiation survival curve, as it precludes the necessity of choosing a model to fit the survival data, it has excellent discriminatory powers, and it represents the survival in the radiotherapeutically relevant region of the in vitro radiation survival curve. Furthermore, as demonstrated in the companion paper, it correlates with cell survival in the tumors following 10 fractions of 2 Gy given in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R G Bristow
- Physics Division, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
The anatomic position and proven radiosensitivity of the thyroid gland make it an organ of concern in dental radiography. A calibrated thermoluminescent dosimetry system was used to investigate the absorbed dose (microGy) to the thyroid gland resultant from a minimum irradiated volume, intraoral full-mouth radiography technique with the use of rectangular collimation with a lead-backed image receptor, and conventional panoramic radiography performed with front and rear lead aprons. Use of the minimum irradiated volume technique resulted in a significantly decreased absorbed dose over the entire thyroid region ranging from 100% to 350% (p less than 0.05). Because this intraoral technique results in radiographs with greater image quality and also exposes the thyroid gland to less radiation than the panoramic, this technique may be an alternative to the panoramic procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R G Bristow
- Ontario Cancer Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|