Nutritional status, cachexia, and anorexia in women with peritoneal metastasis and intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a longitudinal analysis

OBJECTIVE

To describe the nutritional status of women with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from recurrent ovarian, fallopian, or peritoneal cancer and to assess longitudinal variations of the cachexia-anorexia syndrome (CAS) during palliative pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC).

METHODS

Nutritional assessment included body mass index (BMI), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and blood chemistry. CAS presence/absence was recorded before and during repeated cycles (1-11) of PIPAC.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients with peritoneal cancer (n=5) or PM from recurrent ovarian (n=77) or fallopian tube (n=2) cancer were included. At baseline, resting metabolism (RM) (1,432±172 kcal/day), visceral fat level (7.5±3.2), skeletal muscle mass (27.2%±4.6%), upper arm circumference (27.9±4.6 cm), lower leg circumference (35.1±3.9 cm), serum parameters (albumin [3.5±0.7 g/dL], total protein [6.3±0.9 g/dL], and transferrin [202±60 mg/dL]) were below normal limits. C-reactive protein (CRP) (4.3±6.8 mg/dL), caliper body fat (35.7%±6.3%), and total body fat mass (35.6%±8.5%) were above normal limits. Nineteen/84 (23%) patients had CAS at baseline. Deterioration or stabilization/improvement of CAS was observed in 9/55 (16.4%) and 46/55 (83.6%) patients with follow-up data, respectively. Baseline body fat mass, visceral fat level, skeletal muscle mass, caliper body fat, BMI, ascites, Karnofsky index, RM, and CRP, as well as tumor response were not predictive of CAS deterioration.

CONCLUSION

Nutritional decline and onset or deterioration of CAS are difficult to predict. Careful measuring and monitoring of nutritional parameters and CAS in all patients seems to be necessary in order to identify those patients in need of enteral/parenteral nutrition support.

A phase I study of irinotecan administered on a weekly schedule in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetics, and anti-tumor effect of irinotecan in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory malignancies.

PROCEDURE

Twenty-three patients between 1 and 21 years of age, with a solid tumor refractory to standard therapy or for which there was no standard therapy were enrolled. Irinotecan was administered over 90 min weekly 4x, every 6 weeks. The initial dose level was 125 mg/m(2)/day, with subsequent escalations to 160 and 200 mg/m(2)/day. A MTD was defined in heavily-pretreated and less-heavily-pretreated (< or =2 prior chemotherapy regimens, no prior bone marrow transplantation, and no central axis radiation) patients. Pharmacokinetic studies were also performed.

RESULTS

Neutropenia and diarrhea were the DLTs in heavily pretreated patients; the MTD was 125 mg/m(2)/day. Neutropenia was the DLT in less-heavily pretreated; the MTD was 160 mg/m(2)/day. Five patients had stable disease for two to four cycles including one patient each with rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, neuroblastoma, and two patients with ependymoma. Irinotecan clearance was greater that that previously reported for children receiving high dose irinotecan.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended phase II dose of irinotecan administered weekly 4x, every 6 weeks in children with solid tumors is 125 mg/m(2)/dose for heavily pretreated patients and 160 mg/m(2)/dose for less heavily pretreated patients.

Phase I trial of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine in children with neoplastic meningitis

PURPOSE

We performed a phase I trial of intrathecal (IT) liposomal cytarabine (DepoCyt; Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Piscataway, NJ and SkyePharma Inc, San Diego, CA) to determine the maximum-tolerated dose, the dose-limiting toxicities, and the plasma and CSF pharmacokinetics of IT lipsomal cytarabine in children >/= 3 years of age with advanced meningeal malignancies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighteen assessable patients received IT liposomal cytarabine through either an indwelling ventricular access device or via lumbar puncture. Liposomal cytarabine was given once every 2 weeks during induction, once every 4 weeks during consolidation, and once every 8 weeks during the maintenance phase of treatment. The initial dose was 25 mg, with subsequent escalations to 35 and 50 mg. CSF pharmacokinetic samples were obtained in a subset of patients.

RESULTS

Arachnoiditis, characterized by fever, headache, nausea, vomiting, and back pain was noted in the first two patients at the 25 mg dose level. Therefore, subsequent patients were treated with dexamethasone, beginning the day of liposomal cytarabine administration and continuing for 5 days. Headache (grade 3) was dose limiting in two of eight patients enrolled at the 50 mg dose level. Eight of the 14 patients assessable for response demonstrated evidence of benefit manifest as prolonged disease stabilization or response.

CONCLUSION

The maximum-tolerated dose and recommended phase II dose of liposomal cytarabine in patients between the ages of 3 and 21 years is 35 mg, administered with dexamethasone (0.15 mg/kg/dose, twice a day for 5 days). A phase II trial of IT liposomal cytarabine in children with CNS leukemia in second or higher relapse is in development.